One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: one-eyed on May 14, 2012, 03:51:45 AM

Title: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: one-eyed on May 14, 2012, 03:51:45 AM
According to Mark Fine on his SEN show last night, he reckons our midfield is better than Hawthorn's. The reason he gave was that we have our  upper echelon gun mids - Cotch, Lids & Dusty - whereas the Hawks have a sameness across their midfield.

Thoughts?
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: TigerTimeII on May 14, 2012, 06:28:42 AM
Mark Fine is right. Add Grigg to our goal kicking mids and Conca is shafting to hit the scoreboard too
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: Tiger Tragic on May 14, 2012, 08:16:12 AM
I think we probably have more class in the midfield.  Hawks are probably more consistent in there than we have been so far, but hopefully we turn this around.
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: tony_montana on May 14, 2012, 09:00:26 AM
We are on the way, if we keep improving our defensive side then he's we will be on a consistent basis better than most midfields. But we've only just started running hard both ways the past several weeks so let's not get too carried away like Finey, hawks supporters were going off via SMS  ;D
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: peggles on May 14, 2012, 09:17:03 AM
we have more class in the midfield but hawks at this stage have us in turns of depth, but we're improving in that department.  a couple more mids from the upcoming draft and we'd be right.
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: wayne on May 14, 2012, 09:35:06 AM
The Hawks are a bit samey, Sewell, Mitchell and Lewis are all similar types, Hodge is injured/not match fit and I don't know many of their other mids. Shiel, Savage, Smith is it??
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: gerkin greg on May 14, 2012, 11:13:52 AM
Will let you know in 2 weeks
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: Eat_em_Alive on May 14, 2012, 11:36:59 AM
Will let you know in 2 weeks

The rat has spoken
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: WA Tiger on May 14, 2012, 11:44:15 AM
Yes he is right, been saying it for bloody ages, in fact I think we have the best in the comp but.....our back line needs depth, one/two more big bodied players and the forward line needs to click, I mean really click.

We also need to bring in two young players (Arnot & Elton), get rid of Jackson and Edwards and move forward... Then we will get there!
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: Hard Roar Tiger on May 14, 2012, 06:46:17 PM
A mate bumped into Mattie Priddis at the airport afyer our match vs Eagles and Priddis said our mids really surprised them. Rated us ahead of the Hawks as a matter of fact
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: cub on May 15, 2012, 09:42:38 AM
We are right on the doorstep as a team, a couple more drops of sinister sauce may do the trick.
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on May 15, 2012, 10:17:46 AM
We are right on the doorstep as a team, a couple more drops of sinister sauce may do the trick.

Don't worry about adding a touch of tenderness. :lol
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: Stripes on May 15, 2012, 10:47:04 AM
The strength of our midfield now is it has elite players who are difficult to stop, (Cotch, Lids and Martin) supported by very good depth players (Foley, Grigg, Tuck) with young talent coming through as backup (Conca, Ellis). Throw in some good honest role players (Edwards, Jackson) and some small forwards/backs who can run through the middle/wing (Nahas, King, Houli and Newman).

Our midfield is becoming increasingly difficult to stop
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: WA Tiger on May 15, 2012, 12:26:56 PM
The strength of our midfield now is it has elite players who are difficult to stop, (Cotch, Lids and Martin) supported by very good depth players (Foley, Grigg, Tuck) with young talent coming through as backup (Conca, Ellis). Throw in some good honest role players (Edwards, Jackson) and some small forwards/backs who can run through the middle/wing (Nahas, King, Houli and Newman).

Our midfield is becoming increasingly difficult to stop

Totally agree Stripes right up to the point where you mentioned Edwards and Jackson, Jackson maybe but FFS Edwards...NOT the way forward mate!
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: Chuck17 on May 15, 2012, 12:45:30 PM
Don't you rate Edwards WAT
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: Dubstep Dookie on May 15, 2012, 12:48:03 PM
He does, he's just unsure of his role within the 22
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: WA Tiger on May 15, 2012, 12:48:57 PM
Don't you rate Edwards WAT

Stop it Chucky......just stop it..... :lol
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: WA Tiger on May 15, 2012, 12:51:25 PM
He does, he's just unsure of his role within the 22

No, I know his role, so does he. He is there to make sure every other player is accountable by continually turning the ball over.....great for training drills during games... ::)
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: Sabretooth on May 15, 2012, 12:51:43 PM
He rrrrrrrrrrrhates him.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: WA Tiger on May 15, 2012, 01:03:15 PM
He rrrrrrrrrrrhates him.  :laugh:
:thumbsup
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: gerkin greg on May 15, 2012, 02:42:53 PM
Played well against the Swans. Just finished watching the replay twice.
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: WA Tiger on May 15, 2012, 02:52:46 PM
Played well against the Swans. Just finished watching the replay twice.

On fire.. ::) :whistle
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: Dubstep Dookie on May 15, 2012, 02:54:31 PM
Played well against the Swans. Just finished watching the replay twice.

His endeavor, reading of the play and 1%ers were elite
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: The Big Richo on May 15, 2012, 02:55:55 PM
Some of his handballs were so quick and creative they are actually invisible unless viewed on the replay under slow motion.
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: WA Tiger on May 15, 2012, 03:00:30 PM
Electrifying..... :whistle
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: gerkin greg on May 15, 2012, 03:04:27 PM
Have you watched the game yet mate? Cause seriously it was like watching a guy play football, he was that good.
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: TigerTimeII on May 15, 2012, 03:08:50 PM
Edwards was damn good but his knockers will never admit to it .
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: WA Tiger on May 15, 2012, 03:20:25 PM
Amazing player....one of the best, has been on fire for years...FFS, play 22 games with over 20 possessions, no turnovers etc....then tell me how good he is.....WON'T HAPPEN.

Jackson is better, Edwards is poo!
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: gerkin greg on May 15, 2012, 03:31:52 PM
'aint a player in the game that averages over 20 touches a game and doesn't turn it over

think you are getting emotional and being a bit unrealistic there WAT
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: WA Tiger on May 15, 2012, 03:37:28 PM
'aint a player in the game that averages over 20 touches a game and doesn't turn it over

think you are getting emotional and being a bit unrealistic there WAT

He does something stupid every game Gerks, doesn't have the size, gets caught a lot trying to baulk, dodge and weave and will not be part of a GF side with the RFC.

He is poo, get rid of him and there are no more whipping boys for me, he is the last one, completely useless....... ;D
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: gerkin greg on May 15, 2012, 03:43:30 PM
contracted for another year  ;D
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: Coach on May 15, 2012, 03:46:25 PM
Some of his handballs were so quick and creative they are actually invisible unless viewed on the replay under slow motion.

My Donut pointed this out to me as I watched the replay for the 9th time.
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: WA Tiger on May 15, 2012, 03:58:07 PM
contracted for another year  ;D

Trade for a last round pick then...Or pay him out, just stuff him off.
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: gerkin greg on May 15, 2012, 04:01:35 PM
I thought he was going well enough to earn a 3 year extension. You agree?
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: Tigeritis™©® on May 15, 2012, 06:29:39 PM
Get rid of (trade) nanas and bring in a mid/forward that doesn't get blown over by the wind. Enter Chris Knights. 
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: Loui Tufga on May 15, 2012, 06:54:59 PM
Get rid of (trade) nanas and bring in a mid/forward that doesn't get blown over by the wind. Enter Chris Knights.

Chris Knights averages 10 games a year and cant even get a game at Adelaide ATM! He is a broken down hack and unless we get him in rookie draft we should avoid at all costs.

I agree with Nanas though, he will be 36 this year and I cant see him offering any more to the Renegades, its time to move on. Maybe he should take up freestyle skiing again  :thumbsup
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: WA Tiger on May 15, 2012, 07:01:14 PM
Get rid of (trade) nanas and bring in a mid/forward that doesn't get blown over by the wind. Enter Chris Knights.

Chris Knights averages 10 games a year and cant even get a game at Adelaide ATM! He is a broken down hack and unless we get him in rookie draft we should avoid at all costs.

I agree with Nanas though, he will be 36 this year and I cant see him offering any more to the Renegades, its time to move on. Maybe he should take up freestyle skiing again  :thumbsup

36????? WHOA..... :lol
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: Penelope on May 15, 2012, 07:12:40 PM
think TFT mixed up his endowment with his age
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: Loui Tufga on May 15, 2012, 07:28:38 PM
think TFT mixed up his endowment with his age

No, that will be his age as of the may 16 this year ;)
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: bojangles17 on May 15, 2012, 08:29:24 PM
Imho, YES, our top end has more class....foley cotch lids and martin with depth extending further than most think...grigg, tuck, jackson tuck, houli, edwards and now ellis....i consider morris and newy coming off hb as part of a broader midfield...so whoa weve really raised the bar
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: WA Tiger on May 15, 2012, 08:37:43 PM
Imho, YES, our top end has more class....foley cotch lids and martin with depth extending further than most think...grigg, tuck, jackson tuck, houli, edwards and now ellis....i consider morris and newy coming off hb as part of a broader midfield...so whoa weve really raised the bar

Agree except with my old mate, but our forward line MUST click and kick the goals they missed last week. Also, our midfielders need to score as well.
Title: Richmond midfield 'now elite' - Brad Sewell
Post by: one-eyed on May 22, 2012, 04:57:15 PM
Richmond midfield 'now elite'
By Mark Macgugan
hawthornfc.com.au
Mon 21 May, 2012


HAWTHORN is readying itself for a major challenge on Saturday against Richmond, with Brad Sewell describing the Tigers' midfield as one of the competition's best.

After an unspectacular start to the season in terms of clearances, the Hawks' onballers have dominated Melbourne (40-22) and Fremantle (48-24) at stoppages in the past fortnight.

But Sewell is expecting a bigger test against the Tigers, who only narrowly fell to third-placed Essendon on Saturday night.

"In weeks gone past we've had a couple of guys bob up and play well, and a few guys who were below par," Sewell said on Monday.

"But I thought on the weekend, for the most part our entire midfield was pretty good … but we've still got a long way to go.

"Richmond has got a sensational midfield division…[it's] one of the best.

"They've got a really good mix in there of inside and outside players, and their midfielders are kicking goals as well."

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/136425/default.aspx
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: the claw on May 22, 2012, 05:22:34 PM
would agree with all the plaudits being thrown at our mids. imo for 8 weeks now about 14 players have played out of their skins. but hello people the other 8 have been well the way they always are.

genuine mids - cotchin,deledio,martin needs a tank, foley, grigg, tuck conca and ellis learning the caper have all been really good in the main. but its no where enough. 
 it drops away dramatically with jackson sheesh, nahas, edwards houli king and yes newman all expected to rotate thru there.

 we cant possibly ask too much more of the first group atm but sheesh the second group is the reason why we cant get over the line. good sides punish mediocrity. the real problem arises with what younger ones are in the reserves basically there are just two arnot and helbig and while i like the way both go about it there is no guarantee either will make it.

we have no where near enough mids. and we do lack for a couple more of real quality.

what we should be saying is our top 5 or so is up there with other clubs top 5 if not better. and it is, but it falls away people and it falls away  dramatically.

 can i ask who do we ask to step up if say just foley and cotchin get hurt. i know most will say well what if other clubs lose a few of their better mids thing is they drop away like us.

its the same problem with our tall defenders look at the situation we have with just grimes being out. depth and quality is what we must improve and a fair bit. look what happens if big ivan goes down sheesh that would bugger us we cant replace him.
depth depth depth depth and just a little more quality in most areas.
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: dwaino on May 22, 2012, 06:12:28 PM
The Dawks midfield are all similar blokes. Sheesh. Their age, size, and sheesh their experience may get them an edge though sheesh.
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: jordie2tivendale on May 22, 2012, 06:25:00 PM
lmao seems like santa cant escape banter  :lol
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: the claw on May 22, 2012, 07:30:57 PM
lmao seems like santa cant escape banter  :lol
banter i dont mind. stupidity well thats another thing. sheesh.  :lol
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: Stripes on May 22, 2012, 09:03:27 PM
Yes we do need depth but first we need more quality. We are still lacking a CHF, CHB and crumber. These positions have plodders in them at present.

Yes we do need depth but midfield depth is probably the least crucial. If Cotchin, Lids or Foley were to go down we would feel it but if Maric, Rance or Jack (even out of form) were get injured we would be $%@#! We have mpre depth in the midfield than anywhere else on the ground which is why we are harder to shut down now. Tag Cotch and Lids and you have to worry about Foley, Grigg and even Tuck. Sure we could do with some more talent to rotate through there but what we really need is some of our talls to step up first.
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: Hellenic Tiger on May 22, 2012, 09:06:09 PM
Wet weather on Saturday may help us. May bring the Hawks skills down a peg.
Although they did flog us in the wet last year. :help
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: Eat_em_Alive on May 22, 2012, 09:11:25 PM
Yes tucker I remember that game like it was yesterday, it pelted down for most of the day and by night it was hammering. It poured through the entire game and all the way home.
We got smashed that night, comepletey smashed.
It will be intresting to see the rematch if we have improved against this team
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: Stripes on May 22, 2012, 09:25:31 PM
We don't play well in the wet as our game is very much now built on short precise passes. Hawthorn has a similar style but last year their bigger bodied mids found the contested conditions more to their liking than ours. Additionally the wet weather suits Buddies and Rioli's game. Buddy loves it when the ball hits the ground and it turns into a foot race into space against his typically less athletic opponent. Rance is no match for Buddy if he is getting plenty of supply from his mids.

I hope it clears  :pray
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: Judge Roughneck on May 23, 2012, 03:29:29 AM
Rance has the potential to.smash LFranklin. As he did johno brown a year or two ago.

That said hell miss his mate grimes.
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: Sabretooth on May 23, 2012, 09:53:21 AM
Rance has the potential to.smash LFranklin. As he did johno brown a year or two ago.

That said hell miss his mate grimes.

Franklin is too big for Rance, he is the best option but will need assistance in the one on one marking duels.
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: one-eyed on May 25, 2012, 02:15:55 AM
OneHD's The Game Plan show last night put up a graphic showing our overall stats for 2012 are virtually identical to what Hawthorn had last year. For example we are No.1 in total possessions and efficiency this year as was Hawthorn in 2011.

Add to that the overall average age and average game experience of our list is also a year less than the Hawks.

Hawthorn    25 y.o     101 avg. games
Richmond    24 y.o.      77 avg. games
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: Tigermonk on May 25, 2012, 12:16:10 PM
OneHD's The Game Plan show last night put up a graphic showing our overall stats for 2012 are virtually identical to what Hawthorn had last year. For example we are No.1 in total possessions and efficiency this year as was Hawthorn in 2011.

Add to that the overall average age and average game experience of our list is also a year less than the Hawks.

Hawthorn    25 y.o     101 avg. games
Richmond    24 y.o.      77 avg. games

Stats mean nothing.
Hawthorn's midfielders are far more quality & damaging than Richmond. They also have more quality players who can switch & play the midfield role. Anyone thinking we are a better midfield brigade knows squat about football or watching it.
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: Loui Tufga on May 25, 2012, 12:20:00 PM

Stats mean nothing.


And you have summed up how little you know about the modern game in one small sentance :lol :lol :lol
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: Coach on May 25, 2012, 12:23:18 PM
Don't be selective when quoting, TFT. Pull your head in
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: Chuck17 on May 25, 2012, 10:00:01 PM
Dunno.

But any one of our players is better than that bum Butcher
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: Willy on May 25, 2012, 10:03:47 PM

Hawthorn's midfielders are far more quality & damaging than Richmond.

Mitchell, Hodge (constantly injured), Sewell, Lewis, Burgoyne are far more quality and damaging than Cotchin, Deledio, Martin, Foley, Grigg, Tuck?

nope.
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: Loui Tufga on May 25, 2012, 10:28:54 PM
Please Don't be selective when quoting, TFT. Your a top Bloke and I love ya buddy :-*

 :thumbsup :thumbsup is that selective enough for you :-* love you to bro......
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: Willy on May 26, 2012, 12:30:58 AM
 :lol

TFT is in a rich vein of form.  :bow
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: Gargoyle on May 26, 2012, 02:10:27 AM
The only way the dawks midfield will be better than ours is if our players play blindfolded.
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: one-eyed on May 26, 2012, 02:15:22 AM
Hawthorn coach Alastair Clarkson and Richmond counterpart Damien Hardwick are great mates and share similar game plans.

Champion Data statistics show the teams are the bottom two in contested possessions, and the top two for uncontested possessions. A further breakdown shows they are ranked in the top three for short kicks, behind only Essendon, and uncontested marks.

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/hawks-keen-to-resign-sewell-20120525-1zadb.html#ixzz1vtmOrbrJ


RICHMOND might be 13th on the ladder but it is No 1 for uncontested possessions and Hawthorn coach Alastair Clarkson has warned his side of the dangers of allowing the Tigers to get their running game going.

Sixth-placed Hawthorn has an edge in experience ahead of today's round nine clash at the MCG, but Clarkson said ruckman Ivan Maric had made a big difference since crossing from Adelaide to Richmond.

"They've got potent forwards. They've brought (Ty) Vickery back into their side this week, who can do some real damage in the front end of the ground as well," Clarkson said yesterday.

"If we allow them to get some free ball on the outside they can be quite damaging.

"If Richmond win that midfield battle it will make it very difficult for us. We're very mindful that they've got a very powerful midfield, in particular, and a ruckman who's in stellar form.

"We've got a lot of respect for Dimma (Richmond coach Damien Hardwick) and his coaching staff and the way they've gone about it. They've really built well over the last three years.

"We also like to think our experience and knowledge of Richmond will help us get over the line tomorrow."

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/sport/afl/clarkson-wary-of-tiger-attack/story-fnca0u4y-1226367417212
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: Tigermonk on May 26, 2012, 08:15:52 AM
You are ignoring this user, 4 in a row  ;D l bet they are all dribble & drool
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: Coach on May 26, 2012, 09:57:56 AM
You are ignoring this user, 4 in a row  ;D l bet they are all dribble & drool

They do, especially tiger-from-tas. He's a moron
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: sabartooth on May 26, 2012, 04:34:46 PM
Are we better?  Yes! 8)
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: Willy on May 26, 2012, 06:02:33 PM

Hawthorn's midfielders are far more quality & damaging than Richmond.


Another great call from one of our favorite experts!

 :lol       
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: Gigantor on May 26, 2012, 06:07:40 PM
was gob smacked with cotches game today...played an absolute blinder ,especially early on when the game was in the balance...His second and third efforts are something special..Died away somwhat in the latter stages but the game was won by then..In my eyes is clearly the best midfielder going around at the moment...
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: WA Tiger on May 26, 2012, 06:10:39 PM
Have always said it and will keep saying it, we have one of if not the best centre lines in the comp. Finally and I called this for years, Deledeo is in the centre, with him Cotch, Martin (finding form in the last 2 weeks), Tuck the unsung hero and Foley we have so much talent! Get the back line sorted and we have a team!

FOLEY KNOCKERS stuff OFF!!!!
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: the claw on May 26, 2012, 06:37:05 PM
midfield was awesome.ivan, tuck, cotchin,deledio, martin, grigg, ellis, conca and foley have carried us all yr.still not enough if you ask me. we do want another 4 or more  to come thru we have had no real injuries to date and the tier below this lot is nothing to write home about.
if we are going to build it lets go the whole hog.
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: bojangles17 on May 26, 2012, 06:39:57 PM
to answer the OP...lol...how many players did we have > 30 possies, almost 50 more contested possies, CASE CLOSED :lol
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: Gigantor on May 26, 2012, 06:40:04 PM
claw give conca and ellis a chance to develop and you just might not need to recruit anymore midfielders for the time being.
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: WA Tiger on May 26, 2012, 06:44:50 PM
midfield was awesome.ivan, tuck, cotchin,deledio, martin, grigg, ellis, conca and foley have carried us all yr.still not enough if you ask me. we do want another 4 or more  to come thru we have had no real injuries to date and the tier below this lot is nothing to write home about.
if we are going to build it lets go the whole hog.

4...... :gobdrop....and forget the back line depth????
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: Chuck17 on May 26, 2012, 06:49:30 PM

Hawthorn's midfielders are far more quality & damaging than Richmond.


Another great call from one of our favorite experts!

 :lol     

LMAO I wish I could fit a bigger signature
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: Hellenic Tiger on May 26, 2012, 07:47:13 PM
Hawks were minus Hodge, but having said that
on todays showing they were not in the same league as us. :thumbsup
A competitive ruckman also helps. :gotigers
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: Hard Roar Tiger on May 26, 2012, 08:32:00 PM
A mate bumped into Mattie Priddis at the airport afyer our match vs Eagles and Priddis said our mids really surprised them. Rated us ahead of the Hawks as a matter of fact

Good judge priddis  :gotigers
Title: Re: Is Richmond's midfield better than Hawthorn's midfield?
Post by: Judge Roughneck on May 26, 2012, 10:49:39 PM
Rance has the potential to.smash LFranklin. As he did johno brown a year or two ago.

That said hell miss his mate grimes.

Franklin is too big for Rance, he is the best option but will need assistance in the one on one marking duels.

Rance got too much ticker for the sook.