One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: Coach on July 17, 2013, 02:42:24 PM

Title: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Coach on July 17, 2013, 02:42:24 PM
Yes.
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Phil Mrakov on July 17, 2013, 02:43:18 PM
Agree. Is miles past Conca at this stage.
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: (•))(©™ on July 17, 2013, 02:47:22 PM
No rope heads!
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: gerkin greg on July 17, 2013, 02:52:04 PM
kirk ugle
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: WilliamPowell on July 17, 2013, 03:00:17 PM
No
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Coach on July 17, 2013, 03:03:02 PM
Heppell can play and no doubt he would stick fat instead of gawking about. He wouldn't talk to West Coast ;D
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Tigers of Old on July 17, 2013, 03:07:14 PM
We should have drafted Carey, Ablett Snr & Lockett too.
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Coach on July 17, 2013, 03:09:29 PM
We should have drafted Carey, Ablett Snr & Lockett too.

Rubbish contribution to the thread. It was clearly a bad choice overlooking Hep
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Eat_em_Alive on July 17, 2013, 03:28:33 PM
Trolling thread or want input?
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: tiga on July 17, 2013, 03:34:44 PM
But look at who we haven't overlooked....Lids, Cotch, Dusty, Ellis, Flossy, Foley as a Rookie and then if you go deep enough, look at how many clubs overlooked Rory Sloane. He went at pick 44 FFS!
Lucky Melbourne didn't overlook Scully and Trengove. That was one bullet we dodged.
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Francois Jackson on July 17, 2013, 03:35:47 PM
Never liked Conca as a choice and still dont.

Of course fair chance i might be wrong but thought it was left field and there was plenty of value around that pick.

Heppell was the one everyone touted as being a jet yet we took a punt.

Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Coach on July 17, 2013, 03:36:53 PM
It is not a trolling thread and no ones input is overly important because I'm the Coach. We should have drafted Heppell, almost end of story. Conca is a very decent player. However the only thing saving this draft choice would be us bending over West Coast at the trade table. Then we can praise Blair Hartley for a while.

We're sweet
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Penelope on July 17, 2013, 03:38:13 PM
heppel is just a potentially better version of houli, but how much better, considering one was a 1st rnd pick and one a pre season pick?
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Coach on July 17, 2013, 03:41:33 PM
heppel is just a potentially better version of houli, but how much better, considering one was a 1st rnd pick and one a pre season pick?

Worst thing you've ever said. And you have made many pro Helmut posts which makes this even more of a sin. Potentially better? Heppell's game on the weekend was better than any game Houli has ever played...and that's just a normal sunday for Hep. Maybe it's the drugs, I dunno. But he's very good + a lot harder at the onion these days
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Penelope on July 17, 2013, 03:46:45 PM
didnt see his game on the weekend but ill take some some convincing, just as some will forever see houli as a total squib  ;D

last time i saw him play, heppel was still a buffalo girl.
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Coach on July 17, 2013, 03:49:02 PM
But Houli is a toal squib? Needs a heart transplant instead of starving himself for no reason. Still plays the odd game though so good on him.
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: tony_montana on July 17, 2013, 04:29:21 PM
Heppell had his first great game on the weekend - prior to that is very vanilla. No hurt factor, not a line breaker with his run or his loopy kicking. Has strengths like - hes a one grab player, has very quick hands and reads the play well but he is over rated. A lot like Gibbs in the first 3-4 years when everyone would drool whenever he hit a target sideways 30 metres away or took a mark or gave off a handball, regulation sort of stuff the commentators batt off too when a 'name' does it.

If Conca tidies up his kicking he'll be elite, but tbh its a bit concerning, his ball drop is not great. Who else did we pass by drafting Conca?
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Dice on July 17, 2013, 04:35:03 PM
But Houli is a toal squib? Needs a heart transplant instead of starving himself for no reason. Still plays the odd game though so good on him.

 :thumbsup

I'd take Conca over Heppel-titus still though Coach.
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Tigers of Old on July 17, 2013, 05:53:55 PM
Rubbish contribution to the thread. It was clearly a bad choice overlooking Hep

Rubbish. Don't think anything's clear at this still relatively early point.
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: yellowandback on July 17, 2013, 06:03:06 PM
While I think this has been quite well argued - albeit crudely at times without good reason - I'm still fairly happy with the Conca selection as I see him having some more upside if he gets his body right and gets a few full pre seasons under his belt.
Heppell is naturally ahead but fitness base might be helping him
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: RedanTiger on July 17, 2013, 06:21:16 PM
Who else did we pass by drafting Conca?

IIRC Reece said himself that he was expecting to go at around pick 16 so.......
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: the claw on July 17, 2013, 06:38:15 PM
heppel is just a potentially better version of houli, but how much better, considering one was a 1st rnd pick and one a pre season pick?
you have to be kidding right.you have watched heppell play right. he has two things in spades  houli definately hasnt got and neither has conca imo.  thats an ability to buy time in traffic and awareness.he runs all day makes very good decisions and is a fantastic size for a mid at 189cm just wait till he gets to 89kg and gains the core strength that comes with it. bloody hell  ones a genuine mid and ones a battler in the role.
i still think heppell plays a lot like a young scott pendulbury and that was always on the cards. he was always a top 5 pick at worst based on performance skill set size and potential ipside.

also lets not try to  make this thread a bag conca thing its not. he looks like he will become a decent player in time.

all that has happened is a poster has rightly pointed out we should have taken heppell because hes a better player with a far greater upside still.
i save my angst for francis jackson in this.  as has been stated conca at 6 was a stretch and most people involved in the draft said so. imo jackson has been guilty reaching for players in several drafts.
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Penelope on July 17, 2013, 06:49:18 PM
buying time and awareness are pretty much the same thing. (and conca does that in traffic too, and doesnt squib)

and i agree he has houli covered on that. Besides that they are a similar type in the role they play.

my point is, is he that much better than houli when you take into account what they cost? A first rounder compared to a pre season pick?

Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Rampstar on July 17, 2013, 06:59:15 PM
Conca, Ellis and Vlastuin were not only selected because they could play footy they were selected because they bring to the table a cultural shift in terms of what type of player we want at Richmond. Whilst Heppel may be a better player, I dont think he would help change the culture of Richmond which has been nothing short of disgraceful since the early 1980s.
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: the claw on July 17, 2013, 07:34:13 PM
buying time and awareness are pretty much the same thing. (and conca does that in traffic too, and doesnt squib)

and i agree he has houli covered on that. Besides that they are a similar type in the role they play.

my point is, is he that much better than houli when you take into account what they cost? A first rounder compared to a pre season pick?
yes hes infinately better than houli i dont even think houli a mid.

nope they are not the same granted maybe similar. awareness is knowing whats around you and exactly where your team mate is.  buying time is the ability to  get thru traffic and avoid contact which directly impacts on your ability to use well and make a good decision.
houli has struggled as a mid because of it and ive seen little of it in conca in fact his awareness to date is poor and he panics rather than slow up and buy time.

one who has both awareness and an ability to buy time is shane  edwards but his skillset is ordinary along with other things.

nathan foley is so good inside because of his awarenes he shoots out handballs instinctively and they hit every time thats awareness.

for me the best in the business and hes getting on a bit now is shaun burgoyne, he doesnt go thru the midfield as much as he used to but   he combines fantastic skills with both awareness and the ability to buy time. these types are priceless imo. even better if they are big bodied and win their own ball if they have to.
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: TigerTimeII on July 17, 2013, 07:36:43 PM
BS thread Conca is and will be better than heppell

just like hodge is better than judd

heppell judd princesses

Hodge Conca warriors..
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Tigers of Old on July 17, 2013, 07:38:12 PM
buying time and awareness are pretty much the same thing. (and conca does that in traffic too, and doesnt squib)

Conca is fantastic in traffic. That's his best strength. He and Titch are highly underrated at the clearances.
Reece started the year like a gun and had an 8 week layoff.
Meantime Heppell's been pumping himself full of lord knows what.
Comparisons at this point are early IMO. A lot thought Cotch was going to be a mistake early too before he exploded once he got past his injuries.
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: TigerTimeII on July 17, 2013, 07:40:41 PM
heppell is a soft princess  cant win a hard ball and take the hits Conca takes
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: TigerTimeII on July 17, 2013, 07:42:12 PM
heppell is an overrated turd... this thread is pathetic
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: the claw on July 17, 2013, 07:44:22 PM
buying time and awareness are pretty much the same thing. (and conca does that in traffic too, and doesnt squib)

Conca is fantastic in traffic. That's his best strength. He and Titch are highly underrated at the clearances.
Reece started the year like a gun and had an 8 week layoff.
Meantime Heppell's been pumping himself full of lord knows what.
Comparisons at this point are early IMO. A lot thought Cotch was going to be a mistake early too before he exploded once he got past his injuries.
we arent watching the same player then.  dont know how many times ive seen conca just panic with ball in hand  or get run down when he shouldnt.  reckon i will be paying more attention to him now. maybe im missing something.
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: tony_montana on July 17, 2013, 08:43:25 PM
buying time and awareness are pretty much the same thing. (and conca does that in traffic too, and doesnt squib)

Conca is fantastic in traffic. That's his best strength. He and Titch are highly underrated at the clearances.
Reece started the year like a gun and had an 8 week layoff.
Meantime Heppell's been pumping himself full of lord knows what.
Comparisons at this point are early IMO. A lot thought Cotch was going to be a mistake early too before he exploded once he got past his injuries.
we arent watching the same player then.  dont know how many times ive seen conca just panic with ball in hand  or get run down when he shouldnt.  reckon i will be paying more attention to him now. maybe im missing something.

You are claw, Concas biggest strength is his ability to hit packs at full pace clean pickup and weave out, has been doing thsat from the start. Is a better inside mid already and has been playing without a preseason, heard dermie saying earlier this year he gets the feeling Conca is going at abt 50-60% of what he's capable of doing and I agree with that.
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Willy on July 17, 2013, 09:44:27 PM
Claw, I get the feeling that if you watched as many Essendon games as you do Richmond games, you would find a way to bag ShortSteppel too.
You have an uncanny knack for finding fault with our players. If they were as poo as you make them out to be then we'd be sitting bottom of the ladder.
FWIW, I rate Heppel, but Concs was going along very nicely before his injury too. Let's hold off on the shoulda/coulda/wouldas for a year or two.
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Yeahright on July 17, 2013, 10:17:18 PM
Actually reckon Conca works better under pressure and hits targets. When he has time he must be over thinking it.
P.S since when has Heppell had a good game as a midfielder. Only good ones I've seen are a loose backman
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: LondonTiger on July 17, 2013, 10:50:54 PM
Conca, Ellis and Vlastuin were not only selected because they could play footy they were selected because they bring to the table a cultural shift in terms of what type of player we want at Richmond. Whilst Heppel may be a better player, I dont think he would help change the culture of Richmond which has been nothing short of disgraceful since the early 1980s.

Spot on and agree wholeheartedly.  Character and talent of a footy team wins premierships, not talent alone.    Conca needs a full year of no injurys.  He was having a great year before the injury.  Heppell is good, but he tends to wilt under pressure. 
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Crazy_Ivan on July 17, 2013, 11:24:32 PM
maybe im missing something.
Maybe????
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Judge Roughneck on July 17, 2013, 11:56:44 PM
Pre draft I wanted heppell. However upon close inspection he is a batty hot. Concaa is an Italian stallion and will be the superior player.
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Tigers of Old on July 17, 2013, 11:58:08 PM
we arent watching the same player then.  dont know how many times ive seen conca just panic with ball in hand  or get run down when he shouldnt.  reckon i will be paying more attention to him now. maybe im missing something.

Weagles interest in him not enough evidence for you? ;)
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Judge Roughneck on July 17, 2013, 11:59:02 PM
I call bollocks to concs regularly getting run down or panicky
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Dice on July 18, 2013, 08:45:13 AM
all that has happened is a poster has rightly pointed out we should have taken heppell because hes a better player with a far greater upside still.

You say rightly , I say wrongly
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: WA Tiger on July 18, 2013, 09:45:49 AM
We should of..........we should of.......we should of done a lot.
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Judge Roughneck on July 18, 2013, 09:52:49 AM
In his first season every game con a.. got a head injury.

Why heppell was running around loose.


This is not coincidence. Concs is genuinely inside and tough
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: tiga on July 18, 2013, 01:31:30 PM
In my opinion Lighter fluid is a far superior drink to Meth's.

Coulda, woulda, shoulda, Didn't...Lets move on  :sleep
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Coach on July 18, 2013, 02:27:41 PM
Heppell's 36 disposal, 2.2 game was a disgrace.
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: tiga on July 18, 2013, 02:31:49 PM
(http://ebusiness.m-karam.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/dog-bone.jpg)
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Coach on July 18, 2013, 02:32:48 PM
:fishing
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Penelope on July 18, 2013, 05:24:09 PM


 awareness is knowing whats around you and exactly where your team mate is.  buying time is the ability to  get thru traffic and avoid contact which directly impacts on your ability to use well and make a good decision.
houli has struggled as a mid because of it and ive seen little of it in conca in fact his awareness to date is poor and he panics rather than slow up and buy time.
at the risk of being pedantic, you cant get through traffic without contact without being aware of what is around you, can you? perhaps they are not the same thing exactly, but they go hand in hand. you cant buy time without awareness, and awareness buys you time.

On Conca, he did go through a panic stage with the ball. I think he started to get a bit more attention and and started to find himself with less time than he thought and was caught a few times. He's not the first player nor will he be the last to then overreact and start rushing whenever he gets the ball in close. He has adjusted/learned the happy medium is not so prone to that unnecessarily rushed kick now. It was one of the first things i noticed about him was how smooth he could be in traffic and buy himself time.
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: eliminator on July 18, 2013, 05:47:38 PM
Conca is a genuine inside midfielder. He has the ability to think whilst under pressure. He has good vision eg setting up the goal for Maric against St.Kilda earlier this year. He also does a few good things off the ball as well. He will get better with experience. Heppell is a good player but he is not an inside mid.
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: dwaino on July 18, 2013, 06:06:33 PM
Four pages and not one 'Tullamarine Barbie'. I am disappoint.
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Gigantor on July 18, 2013, 06:08:30 PM
My only gripe at this stage with Reece is his disposal..maybe like jackson he can improve this area ;D
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: gerkin greg on July 18, 2013, 11:50:46 PM
Four pages and not one 'Tullamarine Barbie'. I am disappoint.

You don't waste the gold on troll threads mate
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: dwaino on July 19, 2013, 12:10:38 AM
Four pages and not one 'Tullamarine Barbie'. I am disappoint.

You don't waste the gold on troll threads mate

Fair 'nuff.  :shh
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: mightytiges on July 19, 2013, 12:24:23 AM
Not knocking Heppell as he's had a very good year but starring against the Doggies at the minute isn't that big a thing to hang your hat on. Conca had 21 possies, 6 marks and kicked 2 goals against the Dogs and we didn't struggle to beat them like Essendon did.
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Owl on July 19, 2013, 06:11:30 AM
PPL
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Damo on July 19, 2013, 01:48:13 PM
If Conca stays, then he was a great pick.
If he doesnt, he wasn't.

The "go home factor" should ALWAYS play some sort of part in a decision. Obviously if a stand-out is from interstate, then that is the way to go, but in a coin flip, its always safer going the Victorian option.

Heppell = Victorian
Conca = Western Australian.

Now as soon as its contract time we are hearing about the WA teams trying to lure him home.

Its a risk you take when you draft an interstate kid.

In saying all this, i think he will sign, and therefore this thread will be bollocks.

Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: tiga on July 19, 2013, 04:09:43 PM
(http://i39.tinypic.com/2enrf4n.gif)
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Coach on July 19, 2013, 05:42:05 PM
If Conca stays, then he was a great pick.
If he doesnt, he wasn't.

The "go home factor" should ALWAYS play some sort of part in a decision. Obviously if a stand-out is from interstate, then that is the way to go, but in a coin flip, its always safer going the Victorian option.

Heppell = Victorian
Conca = Western Australian.

Now as soon as its contract time we are hearing about the WA teams trying to lure him home.

Its a risk you take when you draft an interstate kid.

In saying all this, i think he will sign, and therefore this thread will be bollocks.




Could sign for 5 years and drafting him would still be a poor choice. Again, he is a very decent player but....




;D
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: TigerTimeII on July 19, 2013, 05:48:46 PM
(http://i39.tinypic.com/2enrf4n.gif)

lmao
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Judge Roughneck on August 11, 2013, 03:55:08 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUBnxqEVKlk

(http://www3.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/Dyson+Heppell+Off+Court+2013+Australian+Open+BOyJYD9Uxpzl.jpg)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUBnxqEVKlk
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: tigs2011 on August 11, 2013, 04:05:46 PM
Game on the line led Cripps to the ball. Cripps sprinted past him and Heppell gave up. Game broke open. Lost them the game.  :bow
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: bojangles17 on August 11, 2013, 04:09:13 PM
certainly did give up, symptomatic of ESS :lol
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Judge Roughneck on August 11, 2013, 04:12:50 PM
not enough drugs in the system   :nope
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Judge Roughneck on August 11, 2013, 04:22:28 PM
first afl footballer with ovaries
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Damo on August 11, 2013, 05:00:02 PM
I know we take pleasure in potting Heppell.

But ESS have 20 you can pot before him.

The guy/girl can play
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: blaisee on August 11, 2013, 06:10:10 PM
Hepell is just so slow, really slow
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Francois Jackson on August 11, 2013, 06:49:51 PM
Hepell is just so slow, really slow

Pendles ain't that quick either.

Swan ditto.

This sissy can play don't worry about that.
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Yeahright on August 11, 2013, 07:38:06 PM
Thought Swan was pretty quick? Especially in acceleration
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: dwaino on August 11, 2013, 08:16:50 PM
Swan got faster after he tattooed some racing stripes on.
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Gigantor on August 11, 2013, 08:23:25 PM
what does that make Dusty with all his tatts?
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: dwaino on August 11, 2013, 08:30:31 PM
Does he have racing stripes? Need red ones. Even faster.
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Coach on March 28, 2014, 01:53:33 PM
Yes.
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Diocletian on March 28, 2014, 04:36:44 PM
Yes.

Indeed.
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: tony_montana on March 28, 2014, 04:39:37 PM
Darling pwns all, should have drafted him.
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Diocletian on March 28, 2014, 04:53:17 PM
Darling pwns all, should have drafted him.

West Coast owned everyone with that scam.
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: tony_montana on March 28, 2014, 05:10:33 PM
Worked it like a pro they did
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: TigerMonk on March 28, 2014, 05:18:03 PM
No cause he will be banned soon by ASADA  ;D
Conca is still being developed with only 50+ games under his belt & interrupted preseason
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Coach on April 26, 2014, 08:41:26 PM
Yes.



About time to fire this one back up. Good work in here. It's gonna get real around here.
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: big tone on April 26, 2014, 08:43:07 PM
Yes.



About time to fire this one back up. Good work in here. It's gonna get real around here.
Stirring bastard!  :cheers
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Coach on April 26, 2014, 08:44:29 PM
;D
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on April 26, 2014, 09:10:15 PM
;D
And you should have been the Tigers coach but you're not!

I know your stirring the pot Coach, but this is what people are intimating.

I say, get on with your lives.  We didn't pick Heppell and we can't do anything about it.  Support Reece and help him be the best player he can for the Tiges.  That is what we CAN do!

With a little luck and hard work he may even become a better player than Heppell, but that won't happen if he gets the "Richard Tambling" service from the tiger faithful.

Go out and support the Tiger youngsters I say!
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Coach on April 26, 2014, 09:13:29 PM
Why do you keep saying I should be the Tigers coach? Couldn't be worse than Hardwick but I don't want the role. Sorry to disappoint.
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on April 26, 2014, 09:15:59 PM
Why do you keep saying I should be the Tigers coach? Couldn't be worse than Hardwick but I don't want the role. Sorry to disappoint.
it's called an analogy…...
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Coach on April 26, 2014, 09:18:48 PM
Why do you keep saying I should be the Tigers coach? Couldn't be worse than Hardwick but I don't want the role. Sorry to disappoint.
it's called an analogy…...

Why are you obsessed with this 'analogy'? This isn't the first time. Calm down. Should have drafted Hep. Would have been pretty rapt with him in our team.
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on April 26, 2014, 09:20:18 PM
Why do you keep saying I should be the Tigers coach? Couldn't be worse than Hardwick but I don't want the role. Sorry to disappoint.
it's called an analogy…...

Why are you obsessed with this 'analogy'? This isn't the first time. Calm down. Should have drafted Hep. Would have been pretty rapt with him in our team.
Why do you call yourself Coach?
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Coach on April 26, 2014, 09:24:16 PM
Why do you keep saying I should be the Tigers coach? Couldn't be worse than Hardwick but I don't want the role. Sorry to disappoint.
it's called an analogy…...

Why are you obsessed with this 'analogy'? This isn't the first time. Calm down. Should have drafted Hep. Would have been pretty rapt with him in our team.
Why do you call yourself Coach?

It's what most people have called me since I was 16 years old and yes, I have coached before. Not sure what that has to do with Conca being a battler though.
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on April 26, 2014, 09:27:15 PM
Why do you keep saying I should be the Tigers coach? Couldn't be worse than Hardwick but I don't want the role. Sorry to disappoint.
it's called an analogy…...

Why are you obsessed with this 'analogy'? This isn't the first time. Calm down. Should have drafted Hep. Would have been pretty rapt with him in our team.
Why do you call yourself Coach?

It's what most people have called me since I was 16 years old and yes, I have coached before. Not sure what that has to do with Conca being a battler though.
So do you understand what an analogy is then?
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Coach on April 26, 2014, 09:29:06 PM
Yeah, I do. Just not sure why you're so obsessed with mentioning me all the time with your "and Coach should have done that but he didn't!"
"Coach should coached Richmond but he hasn't" etc etc

Why are you obsessed with me?
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on April 26, 2014, 09:34:02 PM
Yeah, I do. Just not sure why you're so obsessed with mentioning me all the time with your "and Coach should have done that but he didn't!"
"Coach should coached Richmond but he hasn't" etc etc

Why are you obsessed with me?
Don't worry I'm not.  If you are THAT sensitive to those hypotheticals, I won't use them anymore….sheeeeshhhhh!
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Chuck17 on April 27, 2014, 10:43:12 AM
We should have drafted Pavlich
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on April 27, 2014, 10:50:54 AM
We should have drafted Pavlich
:lol
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: camboon on April 27, 2014, 10:54:22 AM
We should have drafted Ted Whitten
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on April 27, 2014, 10:55:42 AM
We should have drafted Ted Whitten
Why? We have half a dozen out on the park making exactly the same moves he is currently!
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Chuck17 on April 27, 2014, 07:16:28 PM
We should have drafted Ted Whitten
Why? We have half a dozen out on the park making exactly the same moves he is currently!

Yesssss  :clapping eight posts are enough
Title: Re: We should have drafted Heppell
Post by: Coach on April 27, 2014, 07:17:42 PM
We should have drafted Ted Whitten
Why? We have half a dozen out on the park making exactly the same moves he is currently!

Yesssss  :clapping eight posts are enough

WHat about Jayden? Upgrade on CHaplin

:lol