One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: cub on October 09, 2017, 06:46:36 PM

Title: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: cub on October 09, 2017, 06:46:36 PM
Give your 5-1 but vote your biggest sook

Me

Geelong supporters
Adelaide
Geelong
All other supporters
Adelaide supporters


They are all biatches stuff them all

Premiers baby
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Dougeytherichmondfan on October 09, 2017, 06:52:30 PM
1. Geel supporters
2. Chris Scott
3. Brad Scott
4. Geelong
5. The rest.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on October 09, 2017, 07:02:26 PM
North supporters

Geelong Supporters

Adelaide supporters

Chris Scott

Bents - still bitching on Big Footy about Grigg.... apparently we would've won the  Grand Final by
12 goals if Markov had played instead... :shh


p.s. there's already a thread about this:

http://oneeyed-richmond.com/forum/index.php?topic=27069.0

[chucky]please merge[/chucky]

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Dougeytherichmondfan on October 09, 2017, 07:16:18 PM
I have a query of nomenclature.

Is sooking the same as being salty?
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mat073 on October 09, 2017, 07:41:11 PM
We have been everyone's "Paul Pfeiffer " for years - now people are losing their #$@! because we made the school basketball team .
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Slipper on October 09, 2017, 08:04:47 PM
We are Geelong, the biggest sooks of all
We are Geelong, we always go the bawl

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: 🏅Dooks on October 09, 2017, 08:21:21 PM
Norf
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: cub on October 10, 2017, 10:30:13 AM
Forgot about Norf, thats how insignificant they are stuff them
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: tony_montana on October 10, 2017, 01:57:06 PM
Had forgotten that geelong were such squealers. One loss in 10 years and look at them go
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Yeahright on October 10, 2017, 04:51:02 PM
Need Tex on this list

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2017-10-10/lever-has-chosen-money-over-success-tex

And someone needs to ask him what success? The same success that Jenkins claimed to Dangerfield? :lol
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Owl on October 10, 2017, 05:17:50 PM
Geebung supporters
Norf Supporters
Geebung
Adelaide Supporters
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on October 10, 2017, 06:32:02 PM
Need Tex on this list

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2017-10-10/lever-has-chosen-money-over-success-tex

And someone needs to ask him what success?
The same success that Jenkins claimed to Dangerfield? :lol
Jimmy Bartel did today. Said Tex can't talk about success as he hasn't achieved any. Whack!  ;D

Actually, it's all starting to backfire on Walker. People in Adelaide now openly questioning whether he's fit to remain captain given his "juvenile" outburst towards Lever.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mat073 on October 10, 2017, 10:02:23 PM
Someone tell Tex that minor premiers don't count .
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on October 10, 2017, 10:47:41 PM
Need Tex on this list

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2017-10-10/lever-has-chosen-money-over-success-tex

And someone needs to ask him what success?
The same success that Jenkins claimed to Dangerfield? :lol
Jimmy Bartel did today. Said Tex can't talk about success as he hasn't achieved any. Whack!  ;D

Actually, it's all starting to backfire on Walker. People in Adelaide now openly questioning whether he's fit to remain captain given his "juvenile" outburst towards Lever.


Honestly, his performance was crap. Bad day at the office, it happens.

His post-game speech was garbage. I can forgive that because he was upset and I wanted hit ugly face to FO the stage.

But even commenting at all on Lever is seriously poor. This is a time when you go the cliches and pretend you don't mine, kind of like how coaches pretend they haven't seen footage of their own players punching blokes on the field and can't comment on whether or not is warrants suspension.


Seriously all jokes aside I don't think Tex should be captain of that club. Guy is a genuine thug, finger-pointer and sore loser.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Slipper on October 10, 2017, 11:57:50 PM
Seriously all jokes aside I don't think Tex should be captain of that club. Guy is a genuine thug, finger-pointer and sore loser.

Quite true. He'd be more suited to Collingwood.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Yeahright on October 11, 2017, 02:50:00 PM
Need Tex on this list

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2017-10-10/lever-has-chosen-money-over-success-tex

And someone needs to ask him what success?
The same success that Jenkins claimed to Dangerfield? :lol
Jimmy Bartel did today. Said Tex can't talk about success as he hasn't achieved any. Whack!  ;D

Actually, it's all starting to backfire on Walker. People in Adelaide now openly questioning whether he's fit to remain captain given his "juvenile" outburst towards Lever.


Honestly, his performance was crap. Bad day at the office, it happens.

His post-game speech was garbage. I can forgive that because he was upset and I wanted hit ugly face to FO the stage.

But even commenting at all on Lever is seriously poor. This is a time when you go the cliches and pretend you don't mine, kind of like how coaches pretend they haven't seen footage of their own players punching blokes on the field and can't comment on whether or not is warrants suspension.


Seriously all jokes aside I don't think Tex should be captain of that club. Guy is a genuine thug, finger-pointer and sore loser.

Agree with this. In isolation they aren't terrible acts (excluding the Lever one - I think that's poor no matter the circumstances) but the bloke is just spiraling
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on October 13, 2017, 10:44:28 PM
From the Adelaide Advertiser:

THOUGHT OF THE WEEK

"THEY have 10 peanuts on peanuts."


FIVEaa AFL commentator STEPHEN ROWE explaining list management at Richmond where he notes Brownlow Medallists Dustin Martin and Trent Cotchin and All-Australian captain Alex Rance would take up the bulk of the Tigers’ salary cap.

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl/expert-opinion/michelangelo-rucci/adelaides-fall-in-the-afl-grand-final-has-stripped-the-crows-of-the-image-of-being-the-games-darlings/news-story/2709bfafaa985b1390ec6df42f7548d0
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on October 21, 2017, 10:55:39 PM
The Grand Final umpiring conspiracy theories continue on Crows forums. One of them even knocked this video up called "Free kick Richmond":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bet9xIXVhdk

 :nopity


Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: georgies31 on October 22, 2017, 01:03:52 AM
Gez love to meet them again in gf.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Eat_em_Alive on October 22, 2017, 08:05:56 AM
The Grand Final umpiring conspiracy theories continue on Crows forums. One of them even knocked this video up called "Free kick Richmond":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bet9xIXVhdk

 :nopity

LMAO that is gold, the music makes it all the more dramatic.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Go Richo 12 on October 22, 2017, 08:16:50 AM
I reckon the away strip helped the jumper tugs be spotted. We did get the better of those.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Dougeytherichmondfan on October 22, 2017, 09:31:31 AM
 :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol

95% of those are the correct decisions. Ohh the salt.

Subscript. We were an outlier as far as free kick differentials for this season. In the negative. Try again Adelaide.

 :lol :lol :lol :lol
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on October 22, 2017, 10:21:53 AM
The Grand Final umpiring conspiracy theories continue on Crows forums. One of them even knocked this video up called "Free kick Richmond":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bet9xIXVhdk

 :nopity

Build a bridge
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on October 26, 2017, 03:47:22 AM
Crows fans don't like you recalling the fact that in 1997 they controversially got to play Geelong in a home semi-final despite the Cats finishing above them on the ladder. It was thanks to a quirk in the rules with Geelong (2nd) losing to reigning premiers North (7th) and Adelaide (4th) beating the 5th side in the first week of the finals that year. Then add Geelong's Leigh Colbert being denied a clear mark and shot on goal. Nah, no whinging about home-town umpiring  :whistle.

Then in the following year (1998), the Crows finished 5th and were flogged by Melbourne (4th) in the first week of the finals. Now days if you finish 5th and lose your out (as we learnt twice the hard way  :P ), but Adelaide got a second chance, again thanks to the rules of the day, and went on to win the back-to-back flags.

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on October 26, 2017, 03:59:31 AM
These must be Tex Walker's new personalised number plates. Fitting. #gotiges 😹😹😹👎👎👎

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DM9_vldVAAAPCcp.jpg)
https://twitter.com/Tommy10cents/status/923096906112176128

 :lol
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on October 26, 2017, 07:27:52 AM
Funny but they are WA number plates.... :rollin
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Owl on October 26, 2017, 07:59:06 AM
ahh no wonder we haven't seen him, he moved west to hide
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Slipper on October 26, 2017, 09:29:03 AM
Seems appropriate to me that a guy who likes to be called Tex would move out West, and of all things drive an x-trail!
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tigeritis™©® on October 28, 2017, 09:31:49 AM
Brett "igomissinginfinals" Deledio
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: torch on October 28, 2017, 09:41:17 AM
Brett "igomissinginfinals" Deledio

100% correct
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Francois Jackson on October 28, 2017, 09:59:19 AM
not sure if this is consistent with anyone else on here, but i am finding the loud mouth carlton supporters a little less loud these days?

I was tagged in a carlton group discussing the upcoming round 1 fixture between our 2 clubs, to which i replied with a photo of grigg holding the cup.

needless to say it didnt go down well. So here is the thing if you are going to dish it you fools and tag me in your pathetic clubs sites then expect to cop it



Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: cub on October 28, 2017, 10:04:48 AM
While we are up give it to those tankers, let em know stuff them
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Dougeytherichmondfan on October 28, 2017, 10:07:18 AM
not sure if this is consistent with anyone else on here, but i am finding the loud mouth carlton supporters a little less loud these days?

I was tagged in a carlton group discussing the upcoming round 1 fixture between our 2 clubs, to which i replied with a photo of grigg holding the cup.

needless to say it didnt go down well. So here is the thing if you are going to dish it you fools and tag me in your pathetic clubs sites then expect to cop it
Yeah my Carlton mates are a particular brand of smug. Not sure why, theyve been utter garbage for 20 years now. Only one of them reached out to me after our win. Have more than once been reminded of the '13 elim loss, as if that trumps the flag??

One in particular patronisingly predicted we'd miss the 8 and the Blues would finish above us.

Cant wait till we pump them by 8+ in 5 months timw while the entire country warches.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: georgies31 on October 28, 2017, 11:08:50 AM
Can't stand the chests and tankers blues. Most spoons in last decade and how many free rides and first round picks they have had.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: tony_montana on October 28, 2017, 12:16:57 PM
not sure if this is consistent with anyone else on here, but i am finding the loud mouth carlton supporters a little less loud these days?

I was tagged in a carlton group discussing the upcoming round 1 fixture between our 2 clubs, to which i replied with a photo of grigg holding the cup.

needless to say it didnt go down well. So here is the thing if you are going to dish it you fools and tag me in your pathetic clubs sites then expect to cop it
Yeah my Carlton mates are a particular brand of smug. Not sure why, theyve been utter garbage for 20 years now. Only one of them reached out to me after our win. Have more than once been reminded of the '13 elim loss, as if that trumps the flag??

One in particular patronisingly predicted we'd miss the 8 and the Blues would finish above us.

Cant wait till we pump them by 8+ in 5 months timw while the entire country warches.

It’s that misplaced cockiness that supporter bases of rebuilding clubs have early on in the tenure. Dees suffer from it and now the blues, we used to but got bitten enough times to understand it takes so much more than just top end draft picks to win a premiership. Dees fans are starting to realise it now, this season missing out on finals and then having to watch what was in their eyes a vastly inferior list go on and win the flag has humbled a lot of them. Blues will soon realise it’s easy to rise rapidly to a certain point, after that it takes a lot more than just talent to win the big one.

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: 🏅Dooks on October 28, 2017, 12:42:57 PM
lolnorf lolblues..... havent played in a grand final for almost 20 years

Guy at work whos a Carlton supporter cant handle Richmond won the flag.

First he tried the Richmond bandwagon argument, which i statistically disproved and actually turned round in him citing last years membership numbers.

then he tried the Cartons won more flags arguement, which i said 5 of them came before 1915 so its hardly something to hang your hat on.

then in a last attempt he tried the Richmond supporters are feral and carlton are sophisticated line, which i replied 'at least if one left their kids with a Richmond supporter theyd know he wouldnt sell them to make a quick buck.

and in closing, i reminded him that 23 years since their last premiership is now the equal longest period without a flag in thr clubs history, that they are irrrleevant to modern football.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on October 28, 2017, 01:01:34 PM
lolnorf lolblues..... havent played in a grand final for almost 20 years

Guy at work whos a Carlton supporter cant handle Richmond won the flag.

First he tried the Richmond bandwagon argument, which i statistically disproved and actually turned round in him citing last years membership numbers.

then he tried the Cartons won more flags arguement, which i said 5 of them came before 1915 so its hardly something to hang your hat on.

then in a last attempt he tried the Richmond supporters are feral and carlton are sophisticated line, which i replied 'at least if one left their kids with a Richmond supporter theyd know he wouldnt sell them to make a quick buck.

and in closing, i reminded him that 23 years since their last premiership is now the equal longest period without a flag in thr clubs history, that they are irrrleevant to modern football.
:clapping
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Francois Jackson on October 28, 2017, 09:48:28 PM
lolnorf lolblues..... havent played in a grand final for almost 20 years

Guy at work whos a Carlton supporter cant handle Richmond won the flag.

First he tried the Richmond bandwagon argument, which i statistically disproved and actually turned round in him citing last years membership numbers.

then he tried the Cartons won more flags arguement, which i said 5 of them came before 1915 so its hardly something to hang your hat on.

then in a last attempt he tried the Richmond supporters are feral and carlton are sophisticated line, which i replied 'at least if one left their kids with a Richmond supporter theyd know he wouldnt sell them to make a quick buck.

and in closing, i reminded him that 23 years since their last premiership is now the equal longest period without a flag in thr clubs history, that they are irrrleevant to modern football.

mate they are the biggest jokes in the whole league as we sit here right now.

what makes them more insipid is the supporters.

I rarely meet a down to earth one who is in touch with reality.

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: 🏅Dooks on October 28, 2017, 10:18:50 PM
lolnorf lolblues..... havent played in a grand final for almost 20 years

Guy at work whos a Carlton supporter cant handle Richmond won the flag.

First he tried the Richmond bandwagon argument, which i statistically disproved and actually turned round in him citing last years membership numbers.

then he tried the Cartons won more flags arguement, which i said 5 of them came before 1915 so its hardly something to hang your hat on.

then in a last attempt he tried the Richmond supporters are feral and carlton are sophisticated line, which i replied 'at least if one left their kids with a Richmond supporter theyd know he wouldnt sell them to make a quick buck.

and in closing, i reminded him that 23 years since their last premiership is now the equal longest period without a flag in thr clubs history, that they are irrrleevant to modern football.

mate they are the biggest jokes in the whole league as we sit here right now.

what makes them more insipid is the supporters.

I rarely meet a down to earth one who is in touch with reality.

They usually fall squarely into one of a few categories

- poo talkers (ones who use gift of the gab to get through life as they have Zero other life and personal skills)
- surface wealth-ers (all bling no assets) who wear 50% of their wealth
- real estate agents/used car salesmen/vacuum cleaner salesmen/carnies
- wogs who were told as kids that they were 'special' by their mums and honestly believe it today (I can say this as a wog)
- that type of friend/associate that 99% of the time they talk with you, you realise they are trying to subtly convince you to do something.....that will benefit them
-Anyone who's 2nd or third generation European immigrant and whose parents were bAnished in shame from their village, rather than leaving voluntarily.
-pick 3 of the above


 
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on November 02, 2017, 07:21:51 PM
When an opposition club's official twitter feed is salty then that takes the cake  :lol.

From Geelong's official twitter:


"Interestingly the only career highs for Josh [Caddy] in 2017 were marks I50 and clangers. But the all important premiership is a pretty good high!"

https://twitter.com/GeelongCats/status/919788612765474818
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: dwaino on November 02, 2017, 08:34:54 PM
When an opposition club's official twitter feed is salty then that takes the cake  :lol.

From Geelong's official twitter:


"Interestingly the only career highs for Josh [Caddy] in 2017 were marks I50 and clangers. But the all important premiership is a pretty good high!"

https://twitter.com/GeelongCats/status/919788612765474818

The replies are great.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Dougeytherichmondfan on November 02, 2017, 08:49:21 PM
Haha, what a meltdown!
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Chuck17 on November 02, 2017, 09:19:59 PM
That's too funny
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on November 03, 2017, 09:20:10 AM
What an hilarious start to the day.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on November 05, 2017, 03:04:42 AM
Reminder graphics to send to all your non-Tiger mates  ;D ...

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DNwOuo9UEAEVtZr.jpg)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DNv8nbvUEAAjB8z.jpg)
https://twitter.com/CherylCritchley/status/926632017441169408
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on November 05, 2017, 03:09:21 AM
Adelaide folk are still bitter and now want "Best of 3 Grand Finals" :facepalm

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Erin Phillips has a creative idea to resolve questions about Victorian teams getting an advantage on Grand Final day. But it hasn’t gone down well with fans.

Phillips was a guest host on Triple M Adelaide’s Dead Set Legends on Saturday morning when callers were debating the fact the past five Grand Finals had been won by Victorian teams against an interstate opponent.

Since Sydney downed Hawthorn by 10 points in 2012, Fremantle, the Swans, West Coast, the Swans again and Adelaide have fallen short on Grand Final day.

All those matches were played at the MCG even though the past three seasons the “visiting” team finished higher on the ladder than its Grand Final opponent after the home-and-away season.

AFL boss Gillon McLachlan said this week he had no issue with the decider being played at the ’G every year, adding the league has a contact with the MCG for the next 20 years. But Phillips threw up a compromise of sorts more familiar to fans of her other sport, basketball — a best-of-three Grand Final that could be shared between the home states of both competing teams.

“Obviously, the Crows finished top, they get the first home game,” she said.

“Second one goes to the MCG and then game three gets decided back at Adelaide Oval. Why not?”

The idea had some supporters but they were vastly outnumbered on social media.

One Facebook user Gazza Barber called it “absolute rubbish trash talk”, Steve Fisk said the suggestion was “the stupidest idea I’ve ever heard” and Jay Holor described it as a “rubbish idea that benefits no one”.

Objections included the cost of tickets for fans who wanted to go to three Grand Finals, the toll on players of travel and extra games, allegations of sour grapes from Adelaide and the fact Brisbane, Port Adelaide, Sydney, West Coast and the Crows — in 1997 and 1998 — had all won Grand Finals at the MCG.

The best analysis of this year’s Grand Final may have come from Crows fan Jack Mackay: “Maybe if Erin led us instead of Tex we coulda won.”

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/more-news/erin-phillips-suggests-a-bestofthree-afl-grand-final-and-it-doesnt-go-down-well/news-story/7463029078d6dd4e91c53f60f4813348
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Slipper on November 05, 2017, 07:39:17 PM
The best analysis of this year’s Grand Final may have come from Crows fan Jack Mackay: “Maybe if Erin led us instead of Tex we coulda won.”


Couldn't agree more :)
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: cub on November 05, 2017, 08:20:19 PM
^ is this serious ...stuff off
The more I'm getting around every single one of them whinny little biatches, oh it was boring etc etc etc
I knew we would be hated, stuff I love it, let's go back to back boys and stuff this football world up
🏆🍻
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on November 07, 2017, 05:22:08 AM
This has to be the best excuse for Adelaide losing. Read the review :lol :rollin.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Adelaide Crows 2017 Media Cap

53394401
1 / 5
Open Ratings Snapshot
Write a review
Price $29.99

(http://media.supercheapauto.com.au/sports/images/zooms/53394401-zoom.jpg)


We lost the Grand Final because of this cap!


31 October 2017

Lamby
from: Brunswick, Melbourne
Age: 45 to 54
Gender: Male

Where did you purchase the product? In Store
Length of ownership: 3 months
Frequency of use: Yearly
Level of expertise: Competitive
Sporting Preference: Individual Sports
Did you read product reviews online before purchasing this product? No

Comfort
1 / 5
Quality
1 / 5
Performance
1 / 5
Ease of use
1 / 5
Durability
1 / 5
Features
1 / 5

I bought this cap to wear at the 2017 AFL Grand Final as my Crows Membership cap is yellow and the Tigers would be wearing yellow.
The Crows lost the Grand Final while I was wearing this cap. So I am blaming this cap. I will not wear it again. I think with a better performing cap the Crows would have won the Grand Final.

Dislikes: Performs Poorly

helpful: 6
unhelpful: 0

http://www.rebelsport.com.au/Product/Adelaide-Crows-2017-Media-Cap/53394401?utm_campaign=bv_pie&utm_medium=email&utm_source=bazaarvoice&utm_content=review_approved
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on November 07, 2017, 01:38:01 PM
How many caps are needed to cover 48 points
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on November 22, 2017, 04:40:19 PM
Footy SA AFL Grand Final 2017 (1st of October)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4id8qwyST8
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on November 27, 2017, 03:45:51 AM
Ando‏ @Tigers_of_Old:

"We're the Premiers & don't ever forget it. #flogs #gotiges"

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DPgg5o8VAAA1rHd.jpg)
https://twitter.com/Tigers_of_Old/status/934533362672267264
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: 🏅Dooks on November 27, 2017, 01:00:36 PM
Ando‏ @Tigers_of_Old:

"We're the Premiers & don't ever forget it. #flogs #gotiges"

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DPgg5o8VAAA1rHd.jpg)
https://twitter.com/Tigers_of_Old/status/934533362672267264

Look at that meeting of minds!  ::)
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: georgies31 on November 29, 2017, 03:11:52 AM
You know what is starting to irk me you got players like Treloar and dons captain come out and say why can't we do a richmond like we fluked it or something.Don't see a defence like ours at pies or midfield or forward line and the same as the dons maybe there forward line is on par with us.Not to mention the match winners we have to compared to both and more even side.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Hard Roar Tiger on November 29, 2017, 06:46:28 AM
You know what is starting to irk me you got players like Treloar and dons captain come out and say why can't we do a richmond like we fluked it or something.Don't see a defence like ours at pies or midfield or forward line and the same as the dons maybe there forward line is on par with us.Not to mention the match winners we have to compared to both and more even side.

I wouldn't worry about it, hope the clubs continue to think that way, it benefits us. You don't fluke winning 3 finals by an average of 8 goals
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: wayne on November 29, 2017, 08:44:34 AM
I saw a little clip from SEN, Maher asked Frawley and some other guy what they would say to the Tiger players first day back at training.

I think Hardwick needs to say 'everyone thinks we fluked it, they're calling us the worst premiership side ever'

I think that would be good motivation.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: cub on November 29, 2017, 09:25:42 PM
What a load of nonsense
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: cub on November 29, 2017, 09:27:07 PM
And Geelong are still being the biggest biatches
2 games at the G next year handbaggers, better bring tissues and lube
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on December 03, 2017, 03:23:40 AM
Crows fans still bitter :lol.

Quote from: mistylake
So I had to spend nearly 2 hours closing down 6 Commonwealth bank and credit card accounts on Saturday morning after I saw that new Comm bank commercial with the bearded “Ish” singing that Bloody Tigerland song. Got the mortgage broker looking for a new P & I loan on Monday to.
What a hassle, hoping to find a bank with an unintelligible Phillipino computer voice next time.

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/the-grand-final-disaster-of-2017.1178716/page-79#post-53556982
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on January 24, 2018, 02:52:01 PM
We have a new leader on the sooky little babies ladder ...... Ricky Nixon!


(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DUQ_-tWVMAA0G5N.jpg)
https://twitter.com/rickynixontoot/status/954564308272218113

"good news is Richmond has had it charity day and wont be seen again now for another 30 years bit like Rance"

https://twitter.com/rickynixontoot/status/955227608899190784

"Question for RICHMOND supporters with Primary School qualifications how can you be the AFL Best defender if you never play or defend on anyone ?"

https://twitter.com/rickynixontoot/status/955299421209554944

"Didn’t get within 200m of them [Walker, Jenkins, Ottens]"

https://twitter.com/rickynixontoot/status/955312186263420928

"For the 9 billionth time I said he’s a gun utility he’s no defender bc he doesn’t play on anyone plus he’s played 43 games of 100+ that were good - let’s see him Play on Daniher Roughhead Hawkins Brown etc"

https://twitter.com/rickynixontoot/status/955327642693124097

"True Hurley is a way better defender.....Rance doesn't play on any AGraders bc he can't and never will he's a utility at best not a defender second cousins sister"

https://twitter.com/rickynixontoot?lang=en


 :stupid :facepalm
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on January 24, 2018, 02:59:42 PM
We have a new leader on the sooky little babies ladder ...... Ricky Nixon!


(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DUQ_-tWVMAA0G5N.jpg)
https://twitter.com/rickynixontoot/status/954564308272218113

"good news is Richmond has had it charity day and wont be seen again now for another 30 years bit like Rance"

https://twitter.com/rickynixontoot/status/955227608899190784

"Question for RICHMOND supporters with Primary School qualifications how can you be the AFL Best defender if you never play or defend on anyone ?"

https://twitter.com/rickynixontoot/status/955299421209554944

"Didn’t get within 200m of them [Walker, Jenkins, Ottens]"

https://twitter.com/rickynixontoot/status/955312186263420928

"For the 9 billionth time I said he’s a gun utility he’s no defender bc he doesn’t play on anyone plus he’s played 43 games of 100+ that were good - let’s see him Play on Daniher Roughhead Hawkins Brown etc"

https://twitter.com/rickynixontoot/status/955327642693124097

"True Hurley is a way better defender.....Rance doesn't play on any AGraders bc he can't and never will he's a utility at best not a defender second cousins sister"

https://twitter.com/rickynixontoot?lang=en


 :stupid :facepalm

....and if you venture even further down that rabbit hole....

https://twitter.com/bigred_82/status/954580772614098945

(https://imgfast.net/users/3115/50/25/04/smiles/336561073.gif)(https://imgfast.net/users/3115/50/25/04/smiles/933650.gif)
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on January 24, 2018, 03:11:41 PM
...oh and Ricky's obviously just venting - no doubt the #metoo campaign would be making him increasingly anxious..... :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Slipper on January 24, 2018, 10:03:37 PM
So if Rance doesn't play on the comps best forwards, who in our team does?
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on January 25, 2018, 04:11:42 AM
So if Rance doesn't play on the comps best forwards, who in our team does?
According to Ricky, Adelaide's much vaunted key forwards were nullified by thin air  ::).

Rance and Astbury swapped between Walker and Jenkins while Broad ran with Lynch. Clearly, Ricky also missed Rance's crucial 1-on-1 spoil on a leading Walker in the 2nd qtr that rebounded for Jack's goal and proved a turning point.

But hey Ricky, Hurley watching the ball continually go over his head in the Bombers EF flogging by the Swans makes him better than Rance dominating all 3 finals on the way to a premiership  :stupid  :nopity :rollin.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Owl on January 25, 2018, 08:24:32 AM
That's all right Ricky isn't a human's arse  hole but he parades around as though he belongs with the species
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on January 25, 2018, 09:25:34 AM
Captain of All Australian team...says a lot more than a doped up, washed out paedo!
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: H Tiger on January 25, 2018, 10:38:35 AM
Hilarious, as if this guy hasn't covered himself in glory previously. These insane ramblings take the cake.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Go Richo 12 on January 25, 2018, 12:10:54 PM
Rance doesn’t need to defend an opponent when he is so effective at defending the footy.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: cub on January 25, 2018, 12:17:15 PM
Ricky Nixon lmfao ....who follows or listens to this idiot? Quite sad really!
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Slipper on January 25, 2018, 10:03:37 PM
Ricky Nixon lmfao ....who follows or listens to this idiot? Quite sad really!

He is actually pretty good at getting a bite. Let's face it, he doesn't believe his dribble anymore than we do, but he knows that upsetting Tigers fans gets him a lot of attention. And by rating Hurley as a footballer in any sense of the word he upsets everyone else including 80% of Essendon fans. Then he gains all the idiot fringe support from North supporters who desperately buy into his crap about anything Tigers to get solace on the fact that they couldn't get Dusty by offering the biggest contract in AFL history.

In all honesty, I actually think he supports the Tigers. He is like the 10 year old boy at school who teases a girl because he actually has a crush on her.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on January 29, 2018, 03:15:10 PM
Scott West: "If Richmond are winning right-straight away, we're going"

VIDEO: https://twitter.com/AAjswj/status/957785011670761472
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on January 31, 2018, 01:56:46 PM
One of the biggest anti-Richmond sooky little babies - Kane Cornes - is joining SEN on Friday mornings.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/sen-appoints-controversial-interstate-commentator-for-friday-morning-slot/news-story/848024782bd5a544577940d5893b8d99
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on February 02, 2018, 04:45:28 AM
Pies fans join the ranks of the delusional  :wallywink.

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/do-we-have-a-better-list-than-richmond.1185464/

Quote
Had an argument with a mate over New Years, my position was that if the Tigers can win from 13th so can we ... My logic was if both lists were combined more Pies would make it than Tigers. Turns out I’m wrong, my team has 12 Tigers and 10 Pies, but we have better depth, leaving out Degoey, Varcoe, Crisp, WHE..they only miss Prestia.

My team:

Grimes Rance Howe
Adams Reid Houli
Caddy Cotchin Wells
Martin Moore Edwards
Rioli Riewoldt Elliot
Grundy Treloar Pendlebury

Sidebottom Ellis Lambert Grigg

Emerg: Prestia Crisp Maynard Varcoe
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on February 02, 2018, 10:26:07 AM
Pies fans join the ranks of the delusional  :wallywink.

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/do-we-have-a-better-list-than-richmond.1185464/

Quote
Had an argument with a mate over New Years, my position was that if the Tigers can win from 13th so can we ... My logic was if both lists were combined more Pies would make it than Tigers. Turns out I’m wrong, my team has 12 Tigers and 10 Pies, but we have better depth, leaving out Degoey, Varcoe, Crisp, WHE..they only miss Prestia.

My team:

Grimes Rance Howe
Adams Reid Houli
Caddy Cotchin Wells
Martin Moore Edwards
Rioli Riewoldt Elliot
Grundy Treloar Pendlebury

Sidebottom Ellis Lambert Grigg

Emerg: Prestia Crisp Maynard Varcoe

Astbury over Reid any day of the week.

and Howe would be a weak link in a side built on defence.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Dougeytherichmondfan on February 02, 2018, 11:21:54 AM
^^

One of my faves:

Quote
They have the two best players in the league in Martin and Rance, tapers off pretty quickly after that. Cotchin is faux-hard, And he may make our midfield but I’d much rather have Treloar and Adams on ball.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mat073 on February 02, 2018, 01:19:59 PM
We have just won the flag and seen September action 4 of the past 5 seasons .

They have missed finals the past 4 seasons. 

What are they smoking over there .
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Hard Roar Tiger on February 03, 2018, 08:19:07 AM
Pies fans join the ranks of the delusional  :wallywink.

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/do-we-have-a-better-list-than-richmond.1185464/

Quote
Had an argument with a mate over New Years, my position was that if the Tigers can win from 13th so can we ... My logic was if both lists were combined more Pies would make it than Tigers. Turns out I’m wrong, my team has 12 Tigers and 10 Pies, but we have better depth, leaving out Degoey, Varcoe, Crisp, WHE..they only miss Prestia.

My team:

Grimes Rance Howe
Adams Reid Houli
Caddy Cotchin Wells
Martin Moore Edwards
Rioli Riewoldt Elliot
Grundy Treloar Pendlebury

Sidebottom Ellis Lambert Grigg

Emerg: Prestia Crisp Maynard Varcoe

They problem with once great businesses is they don't realise what they've become and they hold onto the wrong leadership for far too long which perpetuates the issue.
Carlton still haven't recovered from this disease.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on February 10, 2018, 03:03:48 AM
Looks like a sooky Cats fan has edited last year's AFL finals wikipedia page  :nopity  :lol.

"The second qualifying final saw second placed Geelong "host" third placed Richmond at the MCG, Richmond's home ground."

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=824737388&oldid=816192247
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on February 10, 2018, 10:36:05 AM
Gave it a tweak to soften it! :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Hard Roar Tiger on February 10, 2018, 02:47:32 PM
Gave it a tweak to soften it! :shh

Thought you were talking about your nipples until I read the wiki page, nice touch y&bb
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on February 17, 2018, 09:15:50 PM
Crows and Cats fans are still so bitter they take joy in us losing a meaningless AFLX game :lol.

Quote from: Adelaide supporter
a "zooper" from 60 to win the game against richmond in the dying seconds. Doesn't get better then that.(unless it happened in real football that is)

Quote from: Geelong fan
Oh how’s that looking for you guys?

Lol the Bears
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/aflx-day-3-allianz-stadium-sat-feb-17th-4pm-adt.1186716/page-3#post-54294054
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mat073 on February 18, 2018, 06:44:37 PM
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/those-at-the-grand-final-have-you-watched-a-replay-yet-needless-to-say-no-richmond-fans-please.1183611/
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on February 18, 2018, 07:05:54 PM
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/those-at-the-grand-final-have-you-watched-a-replay-yet-needless-to-say-no-richmond-fans-please.1183611/
LOL that that thread is still going. Still bitter as ever I see :lol. I wouldn't bag another club's premiership record over decades when they have just won the flag and you haven't won one for two decades  :wallywink.

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Slipper on February 18, 2018, 10:35:42 PM
I liked GreyCrow's reply however.

"I did keep the Chemist Warehouse stuff""
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Slipper on February 18, 2018, 10:48:41 PM
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/those-at-the-grand-final-have-you-watched-a-replay-yet-needless-to-say-no-richmond-fans-please.1183611/

This is worth a look. There are actually some pretty reasonable posts from some of the Crows fans on there. Thoughtful, considered and  magnanimous

Not as hard to find amongst the morons as I might have presumed.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: dwaino on February 19, 2018, 12:49:57 AM
Just went back through recent history to see all the times Geelong has hosted a home final at the MCG. To keep it fair I excluded GFs

2011 QF2 defeated Hawthorn
2014 SF2 lost to North
2016 QF2 defeated Hawthorn
2017 QF2 lost to Richmond

It seems oppo supporters are only recalling one of these. Didn’t hear the handbaggers complain when they were beating Hawks there as home games.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mat073 on February 21, 2018, 12:06:56 AM
https://www.spreaker.com/user/aflcrowcast/grand-final-preview-cast-spectacular

Talk about drinking your own bath water .

Heres their r grand final review which is hilarious.

https://www.spreaker.com/user/aflcrowcast/2017-wrap-grand-final-edition
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on March 07, 2018, 02:49:45 PM
From the Roos forum ...

Quote from: Groin guru
I don't rate Richmond. I only see a North loss on the cards if we take our foot off the pedal and focus on round 1. Ricmond will struggle to make the 8 this year.
 

Quote from: MaddAdam
Yeah, fair farks to the Tigs in that they won a flag, but what won it for them was not some ground breaking small forward line.

Wot wun it was having a brilliant run with injuries, having their top two midfield talents in Cotchins and Martins (both top 3 draft picks) have simultaneous career-best seasons and hitting peak form at exactly the right time ie in September.

Quote from: ozzyoslo
and the AFL closing their eyes when it came to the prelim head non contact rule allowing clubs popular sons to line up on the big stage.

Quote from: LuvtheKangas
And three home finals sort of helped, too.

Imagine if one of our 2015 or 2016 Preliminary Finals was played at the MCG or Etihad.

Quote from: ferball
If only our 2016 PF had been at Etihad or the G.:'(

You have to wonder what would have happened if the Cats had the home final they deserved after finishing above the Tuggers. Richmond out in the Semi after failing to win a final again? Most likely I reckon.

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/pre-season-next-up-jlt-2-v-richmond-wed-7th-march.1182010/page-85

 :nopity
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Chuck17 on March 07, 2018, 02:52:21 PM
 :lol
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: dwaino on March 07, 2018, 03:24:23 PM
The last one is funny because their semi against Geelong was a Geelong home game at the G. Just saying.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on March 07, 2018, 03:44:35 PM
Geez, they've got good memories at Arden St. They didn't even make a PF in 2016  :lol. Only scrapped in by % into 8th (3 wins behind 7th) and were bundled out in a 10 goal EF flogging in Adelaide.

It was in 2015 that they made a PF after again finishing 8th. We choked after half-time in the EF and even as bad as we were they still needed the umps to get them over the line in the last qtr when Edwards clear holding the ball on Cunnington right in front of goal wasn't paid and they ran it up the other end for the match-sealing goal  ::). They then only got through to a PF thanks to facing an injury-riddled Swans in the SF. In the PF, Norf choked on a 21 pt lead to lose by 25 to the 2nd placed Eagles in Perth.

In 2014, they finished 6th and the hypocrites forget they beat the higher 3rd-placed Geelong at the MCG in a SF by a kick :wallywink before copping a 71 pt hiding by Sydney.

It says a lot that North have only finished top 4 after the H/A season once (2007) since Wayne Carey left their club. They've never won more then 14 games in a H/A season since their last flag in 1999. Even we've finished more times top 4 and won more than 14 games in a H/A season than they have since 2000 lol, yet their supporters (both of them) act like they've been a successful club over the past 20 years  :wallywink.



Edit: Beat me to it, dwaino  :thumbsup.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Chuck17 on March 07, 2018, 04:03:19 PM
MT please dont bring up our EF v Norf, it brings up visions of Nahas smashing through Chaplins sturdy fend off
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Assange Tiger 😎 on March 07, 2018, 04:14:12 PM
The trick to dealing with North is acting as though they don't exist.

Because they barely do

 :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on April 25, 2018, 04:07:22 AM
The win last night sure has made opposition fans bitter again.

On SEN after midnight, they were coming up with every excuse to not rate us. "Oh Richmond has had no injuries to their best players", "Oh Richmond has had an easy draw for a reigning premier and only played one top 8 side in the first 5 rounds", "Oh Richmond hasn't beaten anyone decent yet", etc ...

 :nopity
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: wayne on April 25, 2018, 04:29:34 AM
They were all hoping last year was some kind of fluke  :lol

Guys like Conca, Astbury and Grimes have been cruelled by injury, and are finally having some luck.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Jackstar is back!!! on April 25, 2018, 05:22:36 AM
The win last night sure has made opposition fans bitter again.

On SEN after midnight, they were coming up with every excuse to not rate us. "Oh Richmond has had no injuries to their best players", "Oh Richmond has had an easy draw for a reigning premier and only played one top 8 side in the first 5 rounds", "Oh Richmond hasn't beaten anyone decent yet", etc ...

 :nopity

Big issue
We are that good , there isn’t a decent side
We are awesome
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Hard Roar Tiger on April 25, 2018, 09:19:27 AM
Can anyone remember that Demon troll who appeared on OER after we lost to them a few years ago? Crapped on about our culture and how deluded we were. Would love to bump that thread
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Slipper on April 25, 2018, 09:36:33 AM
To be a sooky baby, you at least have to have something relevant to say that will rile the opposition supporters.

I can't think of a club that has less impact on me like that than Melbourne and their supporters.

For me, they are like a jellyfish. They just float around lacking backbone, occasionally annoying with the odd sting here and there, but really, doing nothing and going nowhere except where external forces take them.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Eat_em_Alive on April 25, 2018, 09:43:46 AM
The win last night sure has made opposition fans bitter again.

On SEN after midnight, they were coming up with every excuse to not rate us. "Oh Richmond has had no injuries to their best players", "Oh Richmond has had an easy draw for a reigning premier and only played one top 8 side in the first 5 rounds", "Oh Richmond hasn't beaten anyone decent yet", etc ...

 :nopity

A quick look  at The AFL facebook page last night will show how truly jealous opposition fans are. It's entertaining but also slightly concerning.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: wayne on April 25, 2018, 10:37:07 AM
Can anyone remember that Demon troll who appeared on OER after we lost to them a few years ago? Crapped on about our culture and how deluded we were. Would love to bump that thread

Wasn't it Biffinator from BF?

He made accounts on all the Tiger forums, and he was also the one who did the call saying he microwaved his membership.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on April 25, 2018, 10:45:38 AM
To be a sooky baby, you at least have to have something relevant to say that will rile the opposition supporters.

I can't think of a club that has less impact on me like that than Melbourne and their supporters.

For me, they are like a jellyfish. They just float around lacking backbone, occasionally annoying with the odd sting here and there, but really, doing nothing and going nowhere except where external forces take them.
:lol :clapping :clapping :clapping
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: dwaino on April 25, 2018, 11:00:12 AM
I love it. Has anyone seen so much salt over any team winning a flag? Nobody can handle it.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: dwaino on April 25, 2018, 11:12:38 AM
I don’t get the “so many games at the MCG thing”. So many of our home games are against fellow MCG tenants negating any home ground advantage. We don’t get the 10 free hits at home that interstate sides get.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on April 25, 2018, 01:21:12 PM
We certainly don't get 18 games there a year, every year there like Collingwood used to.... :shh

MT please dont bring up our EF v Norf, it brings up visions of Nahas smashing through Chaplins sturdy fend off

Shank did his best to remind us last night.... :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Lebowski on April 25, 2018, 10:15:36 PM
Its a close race between the crows and cats supporters. Norf have mellowed bc theyve won a few games, but will be back to feral once the come crashing down again
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 10, 2018, 02:12:46 PM
Not a sook as such but it continues the theme of some in the media still not rating us and especially our playing list despite us being reigning premiers and currently sitting on top of the ladder.

The AFL website has only 3 Tigers named in their State of Origin squads (Victoria vs Dreamteam). Cotch & Dusty for Victoria and Rance at FB for the Dreamteam side. Even Jack couldn't get a gig with Jesse Hogan named ahead of him  :huh.

Our 2018 Victoria team

B: Tom Stewart, Robbie Tarrant, Michael Hibberd
HB: James Sicily, Michael Hurley, Kade Simpson
C: Jackson Macrae, Trent Cotchin, Andrew Gaff
HF: Steele Sidebottom, Jeremy Cameron, Shaun Higgins
F: Charlie Curnow, Patrick Dangerfield, Robbie Gray
Foll: Max Gawn, Dustin Martin, Clayton Oliver
I/C: Adam Treloar, Joel Selwood, Ollie Wines, Marcus Bontempelli

Our 2018 Dream Team

B: Rory Laird, Alex Rance, Elliot Yeo
HB: Shannon Hurn, Alex Pearce, Jeremy Howe
C: Bryce Gibbs, Tom Mitchell, Isaac Smith
HF: Charlie Cameron, Lance Franklin, Luke Breust
F: Jack Darling, Ben Brown, Mark LeCras
Foll: Brodie Grundy, Nat Fyfe, Stephen Coniglio
I/C: Lachie Neale, Patrick Cripps, Jesse Hogan, Jared Polec

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2018-05-10/state-of-origin-special-vics-v-dream-team
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Assange Tiger 😎 on May 10, 2018, 02:47:33 PM
Who is Tom Stewart & why is he getting a gig over Grimes/Astbury.

Kade Simpson :lol
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on May 10, 2018, 02:55:43 PM
Who is Tom Stewart & why is he getting a gig over Grimes/Astbury.
The Geelong defender who Dusty famously burnt off in the Qualifying Final last year.

(http://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/162c851ad1bf655b8fc155ae0abc0ed7?width=1024)
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Assange Tiger 😎 on May 10, 2018, 03:43:34 PM
 ;D
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Dougeytherichmondfan on May 10, 2018, 04:06:20 PM
Polec ahead of Shedders.

Lolfest!

Also, if you wanna have Hogan ahead of Riewoldt then how the hell does LeCras get game? Perhaps in his heyday......
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 14, 2018, 08:16:12 PM
Clarkson was privately seething about the way Richmond defended his forwards in the 13-point loss to the Tigers in round three, mainly because he thought Tiger defenders were blocking the run of his forwards with their forearms without actually holding on to them.

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/clarkson-meets-with-afl-boss-as-campaign-continues-20180514-p4zf89.html
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on June 02, 2018, 11:26:17 PM
Can always count on Bomberblitz to go into meltdown and sook it up when being flogged :wallywink  :lol. Makes the win all the more sweeter :yep.

Quote from: idiocracy67
richmond treating us the way we used to treat them 10 stuffing years ago

Quote from: skidmark82
Goes to show what confidence can do for a team. Richmond are full of potatoes playing out of their skins

Quote from: anastasios1979
Yep sadly they’re miles ahead, yet I think their list is full of spuds. Boggles the mind.

Quote from: dougkpga
Makes me throw up that Hardwick is coaching them. They deserved Knights.

Quote from: Mr_Sunbury_1
Hope ****** West Coast win the flag. These ***** are ******* smug ******. Gave me and a few a send off after the game & bagged every player. They can get ******. Hope they have another 37 years of poo-ness. And Melbourne can get ****** too. Get the ***** eagles up this year FFS

Quote from: Lifetime ban
Any chance a Richmond player will be called for incorrect disposal anytime this ■■■■■■■ decade. FFS

Quote from: Lifetime ban
Absolutely, but you know it will never happen to the golden boy. This is the worst display of umpiring this year. Clearly under instruction from the AFL, or have extra money in their pay packets this week. Truly disgraceful.

Quote from: topdon
The game sucks. Virtually unwatchable tripe these days.

Quote from: Hesonlygotaleftfoot
Richmond is the new free kick hawthorn

Quote from: mrjez
Far and away the pootest umpiring we’ve had to put up with all season hasn’t helped.

Quote from: anastasios1979
Junktime jack right on queue.

Quote from: Zimmer
Can’t remember what I was going to post. Who cares. Seriously anyone at the game can see the rubbish umpiring - and anyone at the game can also see we panic when the pressure is on. Not a team yet.

Quote from: GuzzLG
Winning ticket raffle number - 1984

Following this club is like having a boot stomping on your face forever.

Quote from: Lifetime ban
Absolutely no ■■■■■■■ heart in this side. The slightest amount of pressure and they just drop their bundles. Time for a massive cleanout

Quote from: pbomber
Huge crowd at the station already, understandably the team left two qtrs ago

Quote from: is_don_is_good
Oh yeah, we’d be sh8tting this in if it wasn’t for the umpires. I’m going to open up a fing thread about how there’s been a 15 year conspiracy against us, and that’s the reason for our sustained period of ■■■■■.

https://discourse.bomberblitz.com/t/matchday-thread-essendon-vs-richmond/13174/861
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Lebowski on June 02, 2018, 11:48:19 PM
 :lol
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: lamington on June 02, 2018, 11:53:30 PM
 :lol :lol
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 03, 2018, 04:05:10 AM
"Tonights highlight bombers fans cracking the poos at security to open the gates up so they could get out at 3q time"

https://twitter.com/JD_RFC_TIGER/status/1002883103310770177

 :snidegrin
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: cub on June 03, 2018, 09:44:12 AM
"Tonights highlight bombers fans cracking the poos at security to open the gates up so they could get out at 3q time"

https://twitter.com/JD_RFC_TIGER/status/1002883103310770177

 :snidegrin
Like I posted in the match thread, never seen such a mass exodus lmfao peptides
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: strongandbold on June 03, 2018, 12:07:07 PM
Where I was I saw a family of Essendon supporters, with a kid who is a Richmond supporter and forced the poor kid home at three quarter time.

stuffing selfish pricks, the poor kid is having a ball watching their team dominate and you ruin it for her because you're peeed off.

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: ¾ T!geɹ on June 03, 2018, 12:29:03 PM
Where I was I saw a family of Essendon supporters, with a kid who is a Richmond supporter and forced the poor kid home at three quarter time.

stuffing selfish pricks, the poor kid is having a ball watching their team dominate and you ruin it for her because you're peeed off.
Poor kid, how stuffing unfair is that.
I remember when I was a kid, my older brother took me to see Richmond v Fitzroy, idiot made me leave 5 mins before the final siren.
Bastard. Needless to say I still don't talk to him to this day.
And oh yeah, sucked in to him because I win, because my team still exists on its own na na nana na
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mat073 on June 03, 2018, 02:19:35 PM
Feel like someone has to mention Kane Cornes . Whos ahead of themselves now .
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 22, 2018, 05:15:07 PM
Daniel Widera @danwidera
And why is this game not at the MCG ??

Ricky Nixon @rickynixontoot
To confuse the football public that Richmond are not the charity draw that most know they are

https://twitter.com/rickynixontoot/status/1010005874285281281

 :nopity

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on June 22, 2018, 05:47:15 PM
Daniel Widera @danwidera
And why is this game not at the MCG ??

Ricky Nixon @rickynixontoot
To confuse the football public that Richmond are not the charity draw that most know they are

https://twitter.com/rickynixontoot/status/1010005874285281281

 :nopity



Who cares what some washed-up, borderline loser has to say.... :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Dougeytherichmondfan on June 22, 2018, 06:37:10 PM
It’s more, enjoying his Richmond meltdowns.

Lel.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tigeritis™©® on June 22, 2018, 07:38:47 PM
I propose we ban all posts or anyone who posts anything from that Nixon wanker.

That includes you OneEyed! :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on June 22, 2018, 11:31:55 PM
I propose we ban all posts or anyone who posts anything from that Nixon wanker.

That includes you OneEyed! :shh
Why stop showing what a salty fool and loser Ricky is? If we go back-to-back watch these tweets get bumped up by Tiger supporters in his stupid face ;).
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tigeritis™©® on June 24, 2018, 01:38:34 PM
I propose we ban all posts or anyone who posts anything from that Nixon wanker.

That includes you OneEyed! :shh
Why stop showing what a salty fool and loser Ricky is? If we go back-to-back watch these tweets get bumped up by Tiger supporters in his stupid face ;).
because he’s an irrelevant drug taking narcissistic moron that loves the reaction to his own posts and gets his jolly’s from getting a reaction. If everyone ignores him he might just go away.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: 1965 on June 24, 2018, 03:04:31 PM
I propose we ban all posts or anyone who posts anything from that Nixon wanker.

That includes you OneEyed! :shh
Why stop showing what a salty fool and loser Ricky is? If we go back-to-back watch these tweets get bumped up by Tiger supporters in his stupid face ;) .
because he’s an irrelevant drug taking narcissistic moron that loves the reaction to his own posts and gets his jolly’s from getting a reaction. If everyone ignores him he might just go away.


Who are you talking about?


 ;D
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Hard Roar Tiger on June 24, 2018, 07:07:03 PM
I propose we ban all posts or anyone who posts anything from that Nixon wanker.

That includes you OneEyed! :shh
Why stop showing what a salty fool and loser Ricky is? If we go back-to-back watch these tweets get bumped up by Tiger supporters in his stupid face ;).
because he’s an irrelevant drug taking narcissistic moron that loves the reaction to his own posts and gets his jolly’s from getting a reaction. If everyone ignores him he might just go away.

So true
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on July 07, 2018, 05:07:51 AM
The Crows forum is in meltdown lol.

Most of the vitriol is directed at their own players, coaches and club but some of them couldn't help having a bitter shot at us   :wallywink.

Quote from: Maddogmetro
Let's be honest, no non-Victorian team is beating Richmond in the GF this year. They are good enough to be in the match, but then get a 5 goal advantage from the umpires.

Dusty alone is allowed to fend off using someone's face, try to fend off and get caught without htb called, encroach the protected area without consequence, and all he needs to do is look to the umps with pleading eyes to get the softest 50 of all time.

Add to that the constant throws allowed, the umps pulling back an advantage if a player stuffs up their kick after taking advantage, forwards being constantly nudged under the ball and getting their arms chopped.

And then the cherry on top is the bemusing frees that get picked out of nowhere in rucking contests, which all happen to be in Richmond's favour.

There is no hope unless you are Collingwood or Hawthorn.

Quote from: footy4ever
Richmond supporters. They are campaigners. **** of you campaigners. I hope you get smashed in the grand final, (as long as it's not Port you play) In fact I hope you go out in straight sets before the GF

Quote
(https://cdndata.bigfooty.com/2018/07/522863_98daf12ddbb9ff0b8e46ba69ebc79ea5.jpeg)
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/gbu-v-protected-tigers.1198443/page-5#post-56632341
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Owl on July 07, 2018, 10:49:21 AM
LOL are they for real???  They have to be the most deluded pack of sad idiots ever.  The umpiring stuff ups favored them several goals and the scoreline was flattering.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Dougeytherichmondfan on July 07, 2018, 01:00:37 PM
Nah fair play to em, I thought they’d definitely improved from last time we played them here.

Last time we won by 48, this time they cut it back to 47  :clapping
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Lebowski on July 07, 2018, 04:33:42 PM
wow just wow at some of those comments
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on July 27, 2018, 10:41:00 PM
Being top of the ladder with 100k members has hit a nerve with Pie fans.

This one is actually on the Collingwood website and is calling us "evil"  :lol.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This week I look forward to seeing the mighty Mags end Richmond’s unbeaten streak.

What was that? They’re not undefeated, you say?!

Well I’ll be damned.

The way they’ve been carrying on over the past couple of weeks has had me fooled into thinking they’ve breezed through 2018. In my eyes, any positive Richmond-related news is like nails down a chalkboard. Not human nails either – rusty nails.

We really need to bring the noise this Saturday, Magpie Army. For once, we’ll be up against it, with the yellow and black bandwagoners sure to be full of zest over their fancy new numbers.

This 100,000 members is actually nothing to snigger at. I’ve even heard almost 60,000 of them are real-life people who brought one for themselves and not their pets. Remarkable!

What’s even more impressive is the collective nap the AFL world has been on over the past 12 months allowing Richmond to look like a god-damn powerhouse.

Reigning premiers. Can you believe that? A side that used to avoid finals like it was the weird kid in class who ate his own ear-wax (that’s right Adam Vaughan, I remember you) is now a legitimate threat of looking like the AFL’s version of the Harlem Globe Trotters.

Don’t let the snag-gags and cute goal celebrations fool you. The Richmond Tigers are pure evil and will stop at nothing to destroy all that is enjoyable and fun in the world.

Don’t believe me? Well buckle in and let me tell you about my day yesterday.

The day started like any other as I took my pet rabbit Lou (named after Lou Richards) for a walk. After a few km’s, we grew parched. This is when the day differed to the rest of them.

We both decided to revitalise ourselves with a coffee. That’s when it happened.

Jack Riewoldt was in the café.

I told him how odd it was to see him in person as I usually only see footballers on TV and in newspapers. He refused to break eye contact with me while stirring the sugar into his coffee and pretending to yawn the whole time.

Incredibly rude isn’t it? Well the goal-kicking mini-man who operates the forward fifty with him didn’t seem to think so. Jack Higgins also sat there, flicking the froff of his latte at me and Lou. I asked him to stop and all he did was say the word ‘snag’ over and over.

I can still hear it ringing in my ears now.

I told the two of them that they were going to be absolutely embarrassed by Shaz and Bruzzy Maynard this week, and if they fail against Collingwood’s superior backs, Dusty won’t let them come to Vegas in the off-season.

They looked worried at this notion. However let’s be honest, no fake ID in the world is going to get Higgins in Caesar’s Palace anyway.

Don’t get me wrong. I rate the Tiges. Their midfield is actually pretty good. I honestly think Martin and Trent Cotchin would be walk-up starters to our VFL side. This on the other hand is a sold-out MCG and I eagerly anticipate watching Taylor Adams, Scott Pendlebury and Steele Sidebottom make mincemeat of them.

Sidenote: Remember when they were in an unlosable position against us and Cotchin told Adam Treloar that he “spoke too soon” and then they lost? Ha!

Memories from round three, 2016. Good times.

Remember when Travis Cloke kicked seven on Alex Rance? Me too. So does Brody ‘2020 Coleman’ Mihocek. Our new key forward saviour is here to change the guard. He’s looking so dangerous lately it will force Rance to do something he doesn’t often do and man up. You’re right where we want you, Tiges!!!

Every tale in history has a good guy (or girl) and a bad guy (or girl) and if you are familiar with any of them you will know that good always triumphs over bad.

David and Goliath.
Hulk Hogan and Andre the Giant.
Regina George and the other characters in Mean Girls.
Collingwood and Richmond.

Has this week’s write-up lacked a bit of trademark arrogance considering we are playing the reigning premiers? Eh. Maybe.

But I feel no distress for this match. At our best, we will smash them. At our most average, we’ll still probably win.

Pies by 47 and the umpires should save time now by giving Brodie Grundy three votes in his hundredth now.

http://www.collingwoodfc.com.au/news/2018-07-27/oneeyed-preview-topple-the-evil-tiges
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: cub on July 27, 2018, 11:36:19 PM
Did I just read that, not even funny  :facepalm
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Eat_em_Alive on July 28, 2018, 05:16:11 AM
Incoherent rambling  :shh
What's terrifying is that these people actually walk the streets  :o
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on July 28, 2018, 05:33:48 AM
So does WAT..... :shh


...presuming he's not currently incarcerated of course... :shh :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Hard Roar Tiger on July 28, 2018, 06:52:31 AM
It’s just how I like it. Order is restored, the games oldest rivalry is back
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: 🏅Dooks on July 28, 2018, 06:56:44 AM
So does WAT..... :shh


...presuming he's not currently incarcerated of course... :shh :shh

was he the crab bloke from WA or the bikie bloke from WA who was going to save the world?

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Chuck17 on July 28, 2018, 06:35:42 PM
So does WAT..... :shh


...presuming he's not currently incarcerated of course... :shh :shh

was he the crab bloke from WA or the bikie bloke from WA who was going to save the world?

Don’t think he was a real bikie, think he just liked talking tough but when it came down to it he was just a squealer
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Eat_em_Alive on July 28, 2018, 07:39:47 PM
Social media and forums alike flooded with excuses about injuries and throws. Nothing better than pies supporters carrying on about how they're better team but not today.

Yeah nah  :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: 1965 on July 28, 2018, 08:20:36 PM
Pity we didn't lose by less than 5 points.

I can hear the screams now re Higgins GOTY.

 :lol
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on August 02, 2018, 01:40:40 PM
Malcolm Blight is tipping North to beat us in the Grand Final this year  :lol.

https://www.sen.com.au/news/2018/08/02/sens-mega-finals-predictions/

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mat073 on August 02, 2018, 02:41:37 PM
Scotty Watters has GWS winning the minor premiership.  Does he not realize there's only four games left .
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tigeritis™©® on August 02, 2018, 03:19:17 PM
Malcolm Blight is tipping North to beat us in the Grand Final this year  :lol.

https://www.sen.com.au/news/2018/08/02/sens-mega-finals-predictions/
I personally think he actually hates us. Probably because of the crap he copped in’81 when he ran into an open goal without any pressure whatsoever and ran past the goal square and kicked a point believing he was running into the goals. At the time it was the funniest this thing I’ve ever witnessed live on a footy field and we gave him heaps too. IIRC he was sacked by north not long after that.  :rollin
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on August 02, 2018, 03:29:47 PM
Also tipped Adelaide last year to win by 60 lol
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on August 02, 2018, 03:46:15 PM
Pity we didn't lose by less than 5 points.

I can hear the screams now re Higgins GOTY.

 :lol

*they or win  :shh

They present the GOTY award at the Brownlow too...looking forward to the speech....



Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on August 05, 2018, 05:23:05 PM
The toothless tears are still flowing:

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DjyVvFXUYAAYh3L.jpg)

https://twitter.com/7AFL/status/1025859766264901632

 :gotigers
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Dougeytherichmondfan on August 05, 2018, 07:25:35 PM
More Petulant than the Scott brothers put together.

Btw, B Scott stated in his presser that if the Lions won they would have “stolen” the game....
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on September 05, 2018, 05:26:53 PM
Always can count on Tex to sook it up when it's about us  :wallywink.


"I'm going to tip Hawthorn. Hawthorn can beat them."

Tex Walker makes a bold prediction about Richmond on @TripleMAdelaide:

https://www.triplem.com.au/shows/roo-ditts/content/tex-walker-explains-how-teams-can-beat-richmond
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: cub on September 05, 2018, 07:15:12 PM
Always can count on Tex to sook it up when it's about us  :wallywink.


"I'm going to tip Hawthorn. Hawthorn can beat them."

Tex Walker makes a bold prediction about Richmond on @TripleMAdelaide:

https://www.triplem.com.au/shows/roo-ditts/content/tex-walker-explains-how-teams-can-beat-richmond
Will he stand on that statement .....wanker
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: cub on September 07, 2018, 09:17:46 AM
 :rollin keep it up Tex you flog
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mat073 on September 07, 2018, 10:53:10 AM
Kane having big sook over us getting Tom on SEN .
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tiger Khosh on September 07, 2018, 10:29:31 PM
Can someone tell me where the pic of chris Scott is with a clown face on his head so I can quote it with the laughing emoji.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on January 19, 2019, 02:06:36 PM
Quote from: legendstatus
Biggest footy club lol, I always marvel at headline comments when everyone’s clearly knows the Pies are the biggest, if having the most members all of a sudden makes you the biggest club then we seriously have some amateur media personalities

Quote from: Bazza Man
Dont worry about journo crap - they are just obsessed with Richmond. When we win a flag we will get a lot more members signing up and will go past 100k members too. Adelaide count you if you sign up to a newsletter and we have been flogging heavily discounted memberships to get our numbers up too. Having the most members doesn’t make you the best or biggest club. Having said that it does pee me off that they have got so many members.

Quote from: gopies1981
Just wait till Richmond stop winning. Their membership will drop by 50%. And everyone knows that Collingwood are the biggest club in the AFL. We have drawn over 9.2 million people more then Richmond during the home and away season since 1921. Collingwood are 7 million more then the next club Carlton and Essendon are 3rd with 400,000 less then Carlton. In terms of social media Collingwood are the biggest club in the afl followed by Essendon who are 40,000 behind then hawthorn who are 80,000 behind and 4th Richmond who are 110,000 behind.

Quote from: TimothyJ23
100k for Richmond was a flash in the pan - they'll probably cap out at around 90-95k this year and slide over subsequent years as their dominance fades. Provided we can keep up the positive on-field form, there's no reason we can't push up to the 90k mark and beyond.

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/2019-membership-chat.1206290/page-19#post-59208630
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: cub on January 20, 2019, 09:25:23 AM
LMAO ... I love this stuff
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: lamington on January 20, 2019, 01:43:42 PM
I don't disagree that Collingwood are the only other club that would rival Richmond in members/supporters/casual fans. That being said Richmond had always been a sleeping giant and it was woken up in 2017. Bring on 2019, can not wait to cruise into the grand final with dare I say it 120K members.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 17, 2019, 05:59:01 PM
(https://screenshotscdn.firefoxusercontent.com/images/c150d9e4-7dcc-49d9-8751-037fe86dae2c.png)

(https://screenshotscdn.firefoxusercontent.com/images/8e4ec977-770e-4cf0-8743-41b4392073d6.png)

(https://screenshotscdn.firefoxusercontent.com/images/3815f65a-f79f-4c6e-97ab-64654f93052a.png)

(https://screenshotscdn.firefoxusercontent.com/images/da67cb6c-3e4e-480d-88c7-5e8de0b041a5.png)

(https://screenshotscdn.firefoxusercontent.com/images/a4a26dee-b0c0-4883-97c7-872556c868cc.png)
https://twitter.com/rickynixontoot
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Hard Roar Tiger on February 17, 2019, 06:12:10 PM
Should be ignored, he’s an idiot trying to be relevant
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on February 17, 2019, 06:18:06 PM
Obsessed much! Spends all day Sunday in the February off-season tweeting to bag and bait us.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Hard Roar Tiger on February 17, 2019, 07:13:38 PM
Obsessed much! Spends all day Sunday in the February off-season tweeting to bag and bait us.

He’s as juvenile as the 15 year olds on big footy who attempt to troll on bay 13
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Slipper on February 17, 2019, 11:44:46 PM
Should be ignored, he’s an idiot trying to be relevant

The sad thing about him is that he has a lot more experience than most people across the entire enterprise at AFL level. Player, player manager, small business owner and he is a qualified teacher, so he is no slouch. I have been to a football function where he was a key speaker, and he spoke well with obvious knowledge of what he was talking about.

But as you say, instead of making relevant comments on the stuff I think he clearly knows, he carries on with amateurish garbage designed to inflame people which he can't substantiate.

That kind of footy coverage went out years ago (Kane Cornes excepted, but then he mainly appeals to the idiot South Australian fringe).

After his 'scandal' with the St Kilda schoolgirl he reached a fork in the road. He chose the path he is on, but I think he chose poorly. Instead of doing his time and looking for an opportunity to make a worthwhile contribution to the game at a later date, like replacing Mark McLure in any commentary on the game, he chooses to carry on with this garbage.

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on February 18, 2019, 04:03:25 PM
Hope we can win anither flag or two before he dies ..... :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Beans on February 18, 2019, 04:34:02 PM
Obsessed much! Spends all day Sunday in the February off-season tweeting to bag and bait us.
Hopefully his Sunday opinions are not enhanced by anything.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tiger Khosh on February 18, 2019, 06:02:43 PM
Lol he can make his predictions about how we’ll go this year because who knows what will happen. But saying we’ll be passed in membership within 3 months is laughable. They would all need to break or go close to breaking their all time record to surpass where we are right now.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on February 18, 2019, 09:56:24 PM
What does he mean about costing 3 great kids a spot? Is he talking about Lloyd, Miles and CEllis.

Those three would be getting even less time regardless of Lynch.

Needs to sober up
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Assange Tiger 😎 on February 19, 2019, 10:46:35 AM
That's what I thought. None of them are kids either, 2 of them are pushing 30 :lol
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on February 20, 2019, 08:58:39 PM
Charity flag haha.

Geelong, GWS and Adelaide were no pushovers IMO. Not our fault the MCG is our home ground!
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 12, 2019, 02:53:48 AM
From a Hawthorn supporter:

(https://screenshotscdn.firefoxusercontent.com/images/998fd5dd-8c21-4fc1-8a65-851aacc7f7b6.png)
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/rance-collects-people-late-but-he-is-just-clumsy-and-never-gets-suspended.1213481/
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tiger Khosh on March 12, 2019, 07:44:39 AM
The irony of this coming from a hawthorn supporter....
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: wayne on March 12, 2019, 09:36:21 AM
The irony of this coming from a hawthorn supporter....

The unsociable hawks...  ::)

Hodge got away with everything because he was a good bloke.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on July 02, 2019, 10:56:31 PM
Geelong still sooking about the QF two years ago  :scared.

-------------------------------------------------------

Patrick Dangerfield believes it isn't fair if the Cats aren't granted a home final at GMHBA Stadium should it earn a home final.

The Cats are headed for a top-two finish this season, which would allow it to host a home final – the only catch is it will be at the MCG, not its official home ground down the highway.

Dangerfield believes Geelong should be given a "home" final in the true sense of the word – given its home ground is GMBHA Stadium and not the MCG – regardless of its opposition.

The argument is if the Cats finish top-two and have to play a team like Collingwood or Richmond, thousands of supporters would be locked out of the game, given the stadium's capacity is only 36,000 compared to over 100,000 at the MCG.

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/more-news/afl-daily-rolling-footy-news-from-across-australia-for-tuesday-july-2-2019/live-coverage/1121b08c35ac9a19f8bf25e4e5864cc4
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: lamington on July 02, 2019, 11:00:56 PM
So if we finish 5th or 6th we can get a home final at PRO right? I thought being head of the aflpa would make him more conscious of the fans of the game. GMHBA is no place for a final
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on July 02, 2019, 11:50:01 PM
Can't  work out why there is any angst about the MCG as the grand final venue. Since 2000 only 6 premierships have been won by MCG tenants. One in three.

And Geelong didn't have much trouble there before Scott took over
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on July 02, 2019, 11:52:10 PM
Geelong have been playing finals only at the MCG, Docklands and Waverley for as long as I can remember. What's got into them of late?
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on July 03, 2019, 12:02:01 AM
They started losing to us... :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Eat_em_Alive on July 03, 2019, 03:05:30 AM
They started losing to us... :shh
:shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Hard Roar Tiger on July 03, 2019, 06:26:19 AM
Can't  work out why there is any angst about the MCG as the grand final venue. Since 2000 only 6 premierships have been won by MCG tenants. One in three.

And Geelong didn't have much trouble there before Scott took over


Talk of the G being an unfair venue for the GF given interstate sides and Cats see it as an away ground.
Here are some stats:-
Over the past 26 years (since Adelaide, Lions and Weagles entered)
Interstate sides (and Cats) have been 45% of teams in AFL
In that time, they have been involved in a GF 50% of the time and have won the GF 55% of the time when they have competed against a Melbourne side.

There have been plenty of upsets over that period:
Crows ‘97 and ‘98, Lions ‘01, Cats ‘11, Swans ‘12 and Eagles last year (only 3 teams have won the flag from 1st at the home and away season in the last 18 years) so we wouldn’t want the facts to get in the way of a good sook would we?
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Francois Jackson on July 03, 2019, 06:53:14 AM
They started losing to us... :shh

100%

Can anyone remember them whinging when they were playing the hawks during that era?? I don't

All these tears started in the lead up to our Qual final against them  and it's gone from there
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: WilliamPowell on July 03, 2019, 07:03:34 AM
So if we finish 5th or 6th we can get a home final at PRO right? I thought being head of the aflpa would make him more conscious of the fans of the game. GMHBA is no place for a final

Let's be honest here, the only time they had a final at GMHBA they lost to Freo

Are they sure they want to do this  :rollin

Don't think the venue makes one iota of difference to them, they lose more finals than they win  ;D
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: lamington on July 03, 2019, 11:20:27 AM
How can I forget! Pavlich tore them a new one!!!! Good times!!!! :lol
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: lamington on July 03, 2019, 02:39:37 PM
https://www.instagram.com/p/BzZd_oEl4Py/?igshid=1lqwmjytx5fm3

I’ll just leave this here
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Thrasher97 on July 03, 2019, 03:04:37 PM
That sooky baby Chris Scott going on about how grand final at the g for the next 40 years is a travesty.
   :wallywink

  (https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/attachments/chris-is-a-baby-done-1-jpg.702511/)
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on July 08, 2019, 10:53:50 AM
The Tigers are now settling their side after getting seven players back from injury after the bye. With Jack Riewoldt’s return around the corner, they could very easily find themselves back in the top four, and wouldn’t that scare Geelong if Richmond finishes fourth.

https://www.sen.com.au/news/2019/07/07/round-16-talking-points-could-the-pies-slide-how-many-are-still-in-the-top/

:yep
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: lamington on July 08, 2019, 12:17:23 PM
I always maintain football is for the fans. I wouldn’t actually be against the GF to be held at Adelaide oval if the GF was a showdown. Similarly for a western derby. But outside of that it has to be at the MCG
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Damo on July 08, 2019, 12:54:17 PM
I always maintain football is for the fans. I wouldn’t actually be against the GF to be held at Adelaide oval if the GF was a showdown. Similarly for a western derby. But outside of that it has to be at the MCG

The logistics of that is impossible

Sadly it’s now a corporate event and a large percentage of tickets are pre sold
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tigeritis™©® on July 08, 2019, 01:11:03 PM
I always maintain football is for the fans. I wouldn’t actually be against the GF to be held at Adelaide oval if the GF was a showdown. Similarly for a western derby. But outside of that it has to be at the MCG

The logistics of that is impossible

Sadly it’s now a corporate event and a large percentage of tickets are pre sold
Who’s game is it? Who’s league was it that expanded into a national league?

If the interstate clubs wanted it they should’ve had the better league.

It’s our game born and bred in our city. It should NEVER leave the MCG EVER! 

If the interstate teams don’t like it then they can start their own national competition and see how i that goes for them.  :rollin
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Hard Roar Tiger on July 08, 2019, 01:18:33 PM
It’s pretty simple.
Interstate teams get a massive advantage through the getting 10 proper home advantage game through the H&M season.
Melbourne based teams would be lucky to get 3 or 4 equivalent home game advantages. So that imbalance gets them into the finals, then they have to deliver in the finals to win the thing
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Dougeytherichmondfan on July 08, 2019, 01:25:33 PM
I agree with Damo.

The corporate factor is not to be underestimated.

AFL would lose SOOO much $$ if they weren't able to hold it at the 'G.

I don't think they'd give too much of a poo about the average fans not being able to get in, but if they don't have as many corporate boxes and MCC seating to fill they'll never let it leave.

And frankly, there's only MAYBE 2 other stadiums in the country that could hold the GF anyway. So unless every major city's stadium can potentially host it, none should, outside the 'G.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on July 08, 2019, 05:29:24 PM
I know England 's barely more than half the size Victoria with a population  more than twice that of Australia but do supporters of clubs from outside London ever whinge that the FA Cup Final is always at Wembley? Even the Rugby League Cup Final is always there and nearly every team in the comp. is either from Yorkshire or Lancashire way up in the north.......... :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tiger Khosh on July 08, 2019, 05:31:47 PM
I know England 's barely more than half the size Victoria witn a population  more than twice of Australia but do supporters of club's from outside London ever whinge that the FA Cup Final is always at Wembley...even the Rugby League Cup Final is always there and nearly every team in the comp. is either from Yorkshire or Lancashire way up in the north... :shh

No1 plays home games at Wembley so there’s no home ground advantage to complain about.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on July 08, 2019, 05:38:54 PM
Actually Spurs did for the last few years until last season... :shh

Anyway it's about travel & geography as much as home ground advantage - Geelong still complain yet are only across the bay and play at the 'G all the time including home fixtures v Hawthorn & Collingwood...   :shh :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tiger Khosh on July 08, 2019, 05:59:05 PM
Actually Spurs did for the last few years until last season... :shh

Anyway it's about travel & geography as much as home ground advantage - Geelong still complain yet are only across the bay and play at the 'G all the time including home fixtures v Hawthorn & Collingwood...   :shh :shh

Yup only because they were waiting for their new one to get built which was supposed to be done at the start of the season but dragged out big time.

I’d say home ground advantage is significantly the biggest gripe of fans and tbh apart from the grand final I think they have a good claim to hosting finals in Geelong should they qualify to. It’s not up to them to make the afl the most money possible which let’s face it is the only reason they make them have it at the MCG. They’ve proven time and time again that they don’t give a damn about the fans. In any case if you’re good enough you’ll win no matter where you play, didn’t hear them complaining in their golden era, fact is after Scott’s first year in charge they’ve been nowhere near it.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: big tone on July 08, 2019, 07:35:30 PM
Geelong poo me to tears. Their supporters are the stuffing pits.
They are the only Melbourne club to have a genuine home ground advantage. All the rest share the MCG or Marvell meaning there isn’t any advantage most of the time. But they do it so their members and supporters can come and watch most/all games. That is what it’s about surely!!

Interstate teams do have a home ground advantage but they have to travel every other week evening their home ground advantage out IMO.

Geelong wants their cake and eat it too.

How would they think it would work for a home final at their pooheap of a ground against us?
Would it be 50 50 allocation for members of both clubs?
How would their members feel if they shelled out their hard earned all year to watch games only to miss out on a seat in a final?
If it were me I would tell them to shove it.

I always thought Brad Scott was the biggest flog out of the two but I’m changing my mind now.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Slipper on July 08, 2019, 09:03:28 PM


  (https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/attachments/chris-is-a-baby-done-1-jpg.702511/)

WTF

Chris Scott with the money shot?

Got him right between the eyes.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Damo on July 09, 2019, 09:09:59 PM
Lol

Money shot
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Owl on July 11, 2019, 10:50:43 AM
what in boocarky is going on in here???
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on July 18, 2019, 02:19:28 PM
Chris Scott still sooking about playing games at the 'G  :sleep

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Geelong coach Chris Scott has hit back at Gillon McLachlan's "furphies" that the Cats should play home finals at the MCG because it's a venue where they host home and away matches.

https://www.afl.com.au/news/2019-07-18/whats-right-is-inconvenient-scott-whacks-gill-over-cats-mcg-finals-talk
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on July 18, 2019, 03:44:46 PM
Now he's having a sook about us and our fixture  :lol.

--------------------------------------------------------

The 2011 premiership coach then proceeded to question the fairness of Richmond’s remaining six home fixtures at the MCG.

“I’ll tell what I did give a bit of thought to, is the fact that Richmond have won an inordinate number of games in a row at the MCG, and we’re facing that sort of scenario again,” Scott said.

“There is every possibility that Richmond could play their last seven games at their home venue at the MCG, not qualify for a home final, but play their first final at their home venue for the eighth time in a row.

“I think there is some paranoia around the competition about home ground advantage because everyone acknowledges how important it is.

“If you told someone in the US for example that a team could play at the Grand Final venue for the last seven times in a row and then not qualify for a home final but still play the MCG, I think they would laugh at us.”

Geelong are pushing to host a home qualifying final at GMHBA Stadium if it draws an interstate club.

https://www.sen.com.au/news/2019/07/18/scott-responds-to-buckley-jibe-takes-swipe-at-richmonds-fixture/
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Chuck17 on July 18, 2019, 03:52:52 PM

“If you told someone in the US for example that a team could play at the Grand Final venue for the last seven times in a row and then not qualify for a home final but still play the MCG, I think they would laugh at us.”


I am pretty sure they would laugh at Chris
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Thrasher97 on July 18, 2019, 04:27:35 PM
The fear is real...  :shh

Now he's having a sook about us and our fixture  :lol.

--------------------------------------------------------

The 2011 premiership coach then proceeded to question the fairness of Richmond’s remaining six home fixtures at the MCG.

“I’ll tell what I did give a bit of thought to, is the fact that Richmond have won an inordinate number of games in a row at the MCG, and we’re facing that sort of scenario again,” Scott said.

“There is every possibility that Richmond could play their last seven games at their home venue at the MCG, not qualify for a home final, but play their first final at their home venue for the eighth time in a row.

“I think there is some paranoia around the competition about home ground advantage because everyone acknowledges how important it is.

“If you told someone in the US for example that a team could play at the Grand Final venue for the last seven times in a row and then not qualify for a home final but still play the MCG, I think they would laugh at us.”

Geelong are pushing to host a home qualifying final at GMHBA Stadium if it draws an interstate club.

https://www.sen.com.au/news/2019/07/18/scott-responds-to-buckley-jibe-takes-swipe-at-richmonds-fixture/
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on July 18, 2019, 04:56:18 PM
They're going to lose to us again in the finals at the MCG and they know it
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: WilliamPowell on July 18, 2019, 05:25:14 PM

“If you told someone in the US for example that a team could play at the Grand Final venue for the last seven times in a row and then not qualify for a home final but still play the MCG, I think they would laugh at us.”


I am pretty sure they would laugh at Chris

 :clapping :clapping
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: WilliamPowell on July 18, 2019, 05:30:45 PM

Geelong are pushing to host a home qualifying final at GMHBA Stadium if it draws an interstate club.

https://www.sen.com.au/news/2019/07/18/scott-responds-to-buckley-jibe-takes-swipe-at-richmonds-fixture/

Have absolutely no issue with Geelong hosting a final down at the hell hole against an interstate club

But suggest they should host a final against a Victorian Club is laughable. Forget who their opponent might be. Fact is more than half of their very own members would not be able to attend

Not quite sure how Crying Chris would go about explaining that to his ferals.

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Francois Jackson on July 18, 2019, 05:53:19 PM
You can't tell me there isn t a link to crying Chris and that idiot Hocking

When we were losing it wasn't an issue hey Chris


Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tiger Khosh on July 18, 2019, 05:58:01 PM
What’s wrong Scotty? No confident you can dish out another 12 goal thumping with all our players back?
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Owl on July 18, 2019, 06:20:05 PM
Cant wait for him to get sack the whiney sook
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: WilliamPowell on July 18, 2019, 06:21:32 PM
You can't tell me there isn t a link to crying Chris and that idiot Hocking

When we were losing it wasn't an issue hey Chris

SHocking used to be head of footy down at the Cattery before joining the AFL - so yeah they have link  ;D
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Dougeytherichmondfan on July 18, 2019, 06:43:02 PM
Whateley was the one who interviewed him and barely pushed him on that at all.

We play co tenants (away) in two of those games and Carlton as the third away game (and when was the last time we played Carl away at somewhere other than the G, 97?)

We also have traveled 5 times this year like everybody else.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: torch on July 18, 2019, 07:14:34 PM
Geelong are the biggest sooks.

Sooklong Football Club!
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: big tone on July 18, 2019, 10:59:02 PM
I would love our club to fire back at them.

Why is the stuffhead even talking about our club?

IMO, even if the are scheduled to play an interstate team in the finals, particularly if it’s WC, why should their supporters not be able to attend that final if it’s in Geelong?
They would get 20k travelling supporters as a minimum. Why shouldn’t they all get the chance to watch a their team in a final?

Actually I would like the AFL to fire back too at Scott’s comments.
This idiot needs to be put back in his box.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Dougeytherichmondfan on July 18, 2019, 11:10:53 PM
It’s 1967 all over again.

They still haven’t let that go and they still clearly haven’t let the ‘17 Q final loss go. They were smashed by a hungrier, superior team that night but it’s easier to cry foul and throw up nonsense like home ground advantages and crowds being loud and mean!!!

They don’t call them the handbaggers for nothing.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: torch on July 19, 2019, 12:07:37 AM
Just beat the Sooks at the MCG.

If we play them it will get personal.

Chris Scott deflected after the Buckley comment!
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: cub on July 19, 2019, 05:54:20 AM
Sooklong hanbaggers streaking away
Those tears will taste sooo good
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on July 19, 2019, 01:40:46 PM
Maybe they're council could collect some extra tax and build a 70,000+ capacity stadium...goodness knows they have the space for it out there...
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Owl on July 19, 2019, 07:01:11 PM
Sometimes, if you stand on the beach, you can hear their wailing carry across the bay with the wind
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Chuck17 on July 19, 2019, 07:41:40 PM
 :lol
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: WilliamPowell on July 19, 2019, 09:37:43 PM
 :lol
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on August 01, 2019, 04:50:55 AM
MCG final will always mean a free kick for Melbourne teams

Michelangelo Rucci,
The Advertiser
1 Aug 2019


West Coast’s win in last year’s AFL grand final spared the league executive from any awkward questions about locking the premiership play-off to the MCG until 2057. But it might be just a short-lived reprieve.

The Eagles’ dramatic win against the MCG-based Collingwood took away — for the moment — the concern for how the national competition’s most-important game of the year is played to the advantage of a large group of Melbourne-based clubs.

Richmond this weekend will play at the MCG for the fourth consecutive week, albeit as the “away” team to the venue’s original tenant, Melbourne. The Tigers then finish the home-and-away fixture with another three games at the so-called “home of football” — to complete a pre-finals run of seven in a row at the MCG.

It is an inevitable fall-out of a national competition overloaded with half of its 18 teams based in Melbourne and the ground-rationalisation era leaving just two AFL venues (MCG and Docklands) in Melbourne. Where else would the Demons and Tigers play but at the G?

The ironical twist in the MCG debate will be if Richmond ranks fourth at the end of the home-and-away series — and is tied to a qualifying final against top-ranked Geelong, a Victorian rival that calls the MCG home every so often.

Geelong, as the minor premier, would be returning to the MCG for the first time in six weeks and the sixth time this season (while Richmond would be playing its 14th game of the year at the G).

No wonder Geelong is more and more adamant that any home final it earns should be played at its home at Kardinia Park where the capacity of 36,000 is far less than the 100,000 seats at the MCG.

But this is an AFL built on the dollar — and even Geelong has fallen into this commercial trap of chasing cash. The Cats’ 160th anniversary game on July 21 was not at Kardinia Park but at the MCG. It was not against its first opponent of Melbourne but its modern rival in Hawthorn … clearly for commercial reasons.

AFL rules refer to “home state” rather than “home field” in determining where a final is played. Geelong v Richmond has a stronger commercial fit at the MCG than at Kardinia Park. The compelling argument from AFL House will be about choosing the venue that offers more seats to the 70,000 fans who want to attend the final.

Of the past 10 Geelong-Richmond games, only two have been played at Kardinia Park — in 2017 and 2012 with crowds of 32,266 and 21,952 respectively. The eight at the MCG have been split 5-3 in Geelong’s favour and drawn no less than 34,377 fans (in 2014).

The MCG debate will not go away while there is the perception it significantly favours a powerful group of Melbourne-based teams. Thankfully, the AFL no long demands at least one of the two preliminary finals be played at the MCG — a contractual theme that clearly worked against non-Victorian teams.

The AFL top-eight for September’s finals does appear almost a lock with no credible rival to unseat an under-performing Adelaide from eighth spot.

The AFL’s best-case scenario is for the final rankings to be — 1. Geelong, 2. West Coast, 3. Richmond, 4. Brisbane, 5. Collingwood, 6. GWS, 7. Essendon and 8. Adelaide. Then the first weekend of the finals would deliver Geelong v Brisbane at Kardinia Park; West Coast v Richmond at Perth Stadium; Collingwood v Adelaide at the MCG and GWS v Essendon in Sydney.

And, as with West Coast’s grand final win last year, the MCG debate would come off the boil … for a short moment again.

https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl/expert-opinion/michelangelo-rucci/mcg-will-always-mean-a-free-kick-for-melbourne-teams-in-finals/news-story/2a69b3711793fea9ce477cf233d84134
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on August 02, 2019, 12:09:44 AM
All those interstaters whinging about our finals being played at the 'G always conveniently leave out that interstate sides get a massive advantage during the H/A season of 10 home games against opposition sides from outside of their state. It gives them an easier opportunity to finish higher on the ladder. Likewise, Geelong have the advantage of their own exclusive home ground for 7? home games.

We, on the other hand, get just three such home games this year (our recent win over Port plus the Eagles and Lions games coming up). Our 'home' game against the Swans was at Docklands. Clashes with other MCG tenants are neutral derbies so there's no advantage.

No one sooked when we sucked for three decades even at the 'G. The salty tears have only kicked in since September 2017 ::).
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: 1965 on August 02, 2019, 05:07:25 AM
All those interstaters whinging about our finals being played at the 'G always conveniently leave out that interstate sides get a massive advantage during the H/A season of 10 home games against opposition sides from outside of their state. It gives them an easier opportunity to finish higher on the ladder. Likewise, Geelong have the advantage of their own exclusive home ground for 7? home games.

We, on the other hand, get just three such home games this year (our recent win over Port plus the Eagles and Lions games coming up). Our 'home' game against the Swans was at Docklands. Clashes with other MCG tenants are neutral derbies so there's no advantage.

No one sooked when we sucked for three decades even at the 'G. The salty tears have only kicked in since September 2017 ::) .


 :thumbsup
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Francois Jackson on August 02, 2019, 07:55:54 AM
All those interstaters whinging about our finals being played at the 'G always conveniently leave out that interstate sides get a massive advantage during the H/A season of 10 home games against opposition sides from outside of their state. It gives them an easier opportunity to finish higher on the ladder. Likewise, Geelong have the advantage of their own exclusive home ground for 7? home games.

We, on the other hand, get just three such home games this year (our recent win over Port plus the Eagles and Lions games coming up). Our 'home' game against the Swans was at Docklands. Clashes with other MCG tenants are neutral derbies so there's no advantage.

No one sooked when we sucked for three decades even at the 'G. The salty tears have only kicked in since September 2017 ::) .


 :thumbsup

 :thumbsup :thumbsup
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: lamington on August 02, 2019, 08:32:19 AM
All those interstaters whinging about our finals being played at the 'G always conveniently leave out that interstate sides get a massive advantage during the H/A season of 10 home games against opposition sides from outside of their state. It gives them an easier opportunity to finish higher on the ladder. Likewise, Geelong have the advantage of their own exclusive home ground for 7? home games.

We, on the other hand, get just three such home games this year (our recent win over Port plus the Eagles and Lions games coming up). Our 'home' game against the Swans was at Docklands. Clashes with other MCG tenants are neutral derbies so there's no advantage.

No one sooked when we sucked for three decades even at the 'G. The salty tears have only kicked in since September 2017 ::) .


 :thumbsup

 :thumbsup :thumbsup

 :thumbsup :thumbsup :thumbsup
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: cub on August 02, 2019, 10:18:52 AM
All those interstaters whinging about our finals being played at the 'G always conveniently leave out that interstate sides get a massive advantage during the H/A season of 10 home games against opposition sides from outside of their state. It gives them an easier opportunity to finish higher on the ladder. Likewise, Geelong have the advantage of their own exclusive home ground for 7? home games.

We, on the other hand, get just three such home games this year (our recent win over Port plus the Eagles and Lions games coming up). Our 'home' game against the Swans was at Docklands. Clashes with other MCG tenants are neutral derbies so there's no advantage.

No one sooked when we sucked for three decades even at the 'G. The salty tears have only kicked in since September 2017 ::) .


 :thumbsup

 :thumbsup :thumbsup

 :thumbsup :thumbsup :thumbsup
Exactly
 :thumbsup :thumbsup :thumbsup :thumbsup
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on August 14, 2019, 12:37:49 PM
Expect another bout of sooking from Chris Scott  :rollin.

Cat-astrophe! Geelong’s home final set for MCG.

Jon Ralph
Herald-Sun
14 Aug 2019


THE AFL is determined to schedule a Thursday night week one final but has officially ruled out a GMHBA Stadium final in September.

The league is desperate to maximise its attendances across the season, hopeful it could break last year’s home-and-away record attendance in the next fortnight.

That same policy is certain to result in the Cats playing an MCG final if they qualify — potentially against Richmond — rather than at GMHBA Stadium.

AFL fixturing boss Travis Auld told the Herald Sun that while teams had the right to play in their own state, “we want to give as many fans a chance to watch their team play”.

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/teams/geelong/geelong-set-to-play-home-qualifying-final-at-mcg-as-afl-rules-out-gmhba-stadium-as-finals-venue/news-story/50c1e1b0066e41d8b54c77486f79247a
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Owl on August 14, 2019, 05:51:17 PM
Geelongs North Korean Supporters group not happy about it either
(https://timenewsfeed.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/korea1.jpg?w=600&h=400&crop=1)
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on August 14, 2019, 06:51:59 PM
Geelong's executive team declined the opportunity to publicly state their disappointment at the decision, but coach Chris Scott reacted to the AFL's call later on Wednesday.

"They were definitive about maximising attendances for finals which is absolutely (the AFL's) right," he said.

"If they've made their call we've got no choice but to acquiesce.

"I don't think it augurs well for the Gold Coast or GWS or some of the smaller Melbourne clubs into the future.

"But it's their prerogative to decide what they prioritise.

"Whether I agree with it or whether football people in general agree with it, it's probably beside the point."

https://www.afl.com.au/news/2019-08-14/weve-got-no-choice-but-to-acquiesce-cats-denied-home-final
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tiger Khosh on August 14, 2019, 07:55:05 PM
Are there smaller Melbourne clubs than Geelong???

If there are iv never heard them complain about playing games at the G.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Owl on August 14, 2019, 08:12:58 PM
Geelong's executive team declined the opportunity to publicly state their disappointment at the decision, but coach Chris Scott reacted to the AFL's call later on Wednesday.

"They were definitive about maximising attendances for finals which is absolutely (the AFL's) right," he said.

"If they've made their call we've got no choice but to acquiesce.

"I don't think it augurs well for the Gold Coast or GWS or some of the smaller Melbourne clubs into the future.

"But it's their prerogative to decide what they prioritise.

"Whether I agree with it or whether football people in general agree with it, it's probably beside the point."

https://www.afl.com.au/news/2019-08-14/weve-got-no-choice-but-to-acquiesce-cats-denied-home-final
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48H34ukFe8g
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on August 19, 2019, 10:17:09 PM
Kane Cornes on Footy Classified sooking about us  :nopity.

Especially, carried on about our run home at the 'G as being "the biggest free kick" and trying to use it as the excuse for us beating West Coast who have had to travel a fair bit in recent weeks.

When Caro said she sensed a fair bit of anti-Richmond in his comments tonight, Cornes replied he had to counter her pro-Richmond bias  ::).
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on August 24, 2019, 10:53:10 PM
'The system is wrong': Scott slams AFL over MCG grand final

Daniel Cherny,
Nell O'Shea
24 Aug 2019


Geelong coach Chris Scott has again attacked the AFL over the league's finals fixturing arrangement, declaring "the system is wrong".

The Cats booked a top-two spot with a 68-point win over Carlton at GMHBA Stadium on Saturday, however Geelong's home qualifying final will be played at the MCG despite the club's push to bring finals football to Geelong.

Asked about the issue, Scott broadened his complaint, pointing to the fact that the grand final is played at the MCG.

"I'm going to take it away from the Geelong thing, because anyone who's not a Geelong supporter just considers it whingeing," Scott said.

"The one thing I will say is that most normal people know the system is wrong. There can be no doubting that it's wrong. But it is what it is. West Coast and Brisbane, GWS for that matter, maybe the Crows and Port, have to come and win a grand final, probably at their opposition's home ground as well. The system's bizarre. So you need to be that little bit better. Which West Coast were last year.

"Are we confident we're that? We're hopeful. We've had a good preparation. We've given ourselves every chance. Now whether we can go and beat teams that play 15 games at the MCG every year, including probably 10 or 12 in a row, is yet to be seen. But we're up for the challenge."

The 'G will continue to host the grand final until 2057 under a deal signed last year.

The Cats will finish first if Richmond beat Brisbane on Sunday, and will fall to second if the Lions beat the Tigers.

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/the-system-is-wrong-scott-slams-afl-over-mcg-grand-final-20190824-p52kfe.html
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Hard Roar Tiger on August 24, 2019, 11:06:49 PM
A lot will have to go right for you to win a flag, ya flog
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: cub on August 25, 2019, 06:22:08 AM
But he’s talking about Richmond not the G
We are so in their heads
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: big tone on August 25, 2019, 10:58:06 AM
Even my Geelong mate thinks he should shut the “truck” up.

What a complete wanker.

I’m really hoping they go out in straight sets as they are fast becoming my most disliked club.
Still a fair way off Essendon though.....
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on August 25, 2019, 11:03:33 AM
Chris Scott and Geelong are out of control. There continual whinging is a blight on the game and he is bringing the game into disrepute with his whining bitching and complaining. The AFL needs to haul the l Ioser into line.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on August 25, 2019, 11:51:22 AM
You would have thought they always played finals at KP.....

Hey Chris, in the history of the VFL/AFL you have only played at KP once against Freo (2013) because the MCG was not available. Even in 2012 you played your home final against Freo at the MCG. So why didn't Geelong complain about playing at the MCG in the 60's and 70's?

The wording is you get a home state final, not a home ground final.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: WilliamPowell on August 25, 2019, 12:02:53 PM
You would have thought they always played finals at KP.....

Hey Chris, in the history of the VFL/AFL you have only played at KP once against Freo (2013) because the MCG was not available. Even in 2012 you played your home final against Freo at the MCG. So why didn't Geelong complain about playing at the MCG in the 60's and 70's?

The wording is you get a home state final, not a home ground final.

Said this before. Only time they had a final at KP they lost  :rollin

Also just had a "discussion" with Cats member who said they they've fighting for decades to get home finals at KP.

This is simply not true. Only banging on about it since the ground upgraded....but let's not allow facts to get in the way of a good whinge
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on August 25, 2019, 12:27:09 PM
Six of their first seven flags were won after finishing on the top of the ladder and playing all their finals at the 'G. Their 6th and 8th flags were all played at the 'G when they finished second. I must have missed where Reg Hickey, Bobby Davis and Bomber Thompson all complained about home finals being played at the 'G!  ::)

In Chris Scott's first year as coach they finished above Hawthorn and yet had to play their home QF at the 'G. They also went on to win their 9th and last flag. I don't remember him sooking back then like this despite Hawthorn having the M.C.G. as their home ground  ::).

https://afltables.com/afl/teams/geelong/allgames_vn.html#5

This whinging has only started since September 2017 :nopity.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on September 25, 2019, 10:32:34 PM
Now we've got SA pollies still sooking about the GF being at the 'G even though neither of their state's clubs even made the finals :wallywink.

AFL grand final should be shared, MP says

Daniel Wills
State Political Editor, The Advertiser
September 25, 2019

 
A LIBERAL MP who played AFL football for Collingwood has joined the call for the MCG to be stripped of automatic grand final hosting rights to make the competition truly national.

Former Holdfast Bay mayor Stephen Patterson, who was elected to State Parliament last year in the bayside seat of Morphett, says Adelaide Oval has proven itself an exceptional venue for SANFL and AFLW grand finals and deserves the chance to host Aussie Rules’ grand final.

In a speech to Parliament on Tuesday, the former Norwood man paid tribute to Glenelg’s drought-breaking SANFL premiership win at the weekend.

It also comes ahead of this weekend’s AFL showdown between the Richmond Tigers and Western Sydney Giants.

“Congratulations to SANFL chief executive Jake Parkinson and his team for putting on a fantastic grand final, coming in the same season as the AFLW grand final which saw a full house at Adelaide Oval,” Mr Patterson said.

“It is therefore disappointing to South Australians that the AFL has locked in the AFL grand final at the MCG until 2057 instead of being visionary and rotating the grand final across the nation.

“The 1990s saw the dismantling of the entitlement of the MCG to host a final each week and this last vestige of the VFL should go the same way.”

The AFL last year confirmed the MCG would be the permanent home of the grand final for the next four decades under a “$500 million mega-deal” involving the Victorian Government.

SA football legend Graham Cornes wrote in The Advertiser at the time that: “The AFL, which has taken so much from the American sports models, has succumbed to local political pressures and incentives (some would say bribery) to keep its marquee event at the MCG”.

“It seems almost every decision of the AFL is designed to benefit those incompetent, Victorian football clubs which long ago, without interstate money, AFL or Victorian government handouts, would have been bankrupted,” he wrote.

“The MCG? Victorian propaganda claims it is the best stadium in the world. It’s not.

“It is a concrete cauldron that has little of the aesthetic or cultural appeal of the Adelaide Oval or, despite its man-eating LED signs, the new stadium in Perth.”

https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/sa-liberal-mp-stephen-patterson-calls-for-mcg-to-lose-automatic-grand-final-rights-be-shared-with-adelaide/news-story/6931b5d8db6f23db50707a32d146cfde
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on September 29, 2019, 08:19:48 AM
A fair bit of sooking on opposition club forums and on SEN late last night.

The best one was the Geelong caller who went on and on about them having to play the "harder" finals fixture compared to Richmond :huh3.

He whinged that because we got to play Brisbane who hadn't played finals in a decade (conveniently left out that it was at the 'Gabba) that we had it easier than the Cats did. He wanted the finals fixture rigged so Geelong got the 'easier' final.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mat073 on September 29, 2019, 10:59:10 AM
I was reading the geelong page on big footy.

" what history won't show was we were in front of these guys by 21 points at half time - without our full forward "

So so salty.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: WilliamPowell on September 29, 2019, 12:52:09 PM
I was reading the geelong page on big footy.

" what history won't show was we were in front of these guys by 21 points at half time - without our full forward "

So so salty.

There right, all that in their favour and they still lost  :rollin
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: cub on September 29, 2019, 02:39:58 PM
Haven't read anything yet, but This flag has put the ! on it. We are now the biggest and the best and they all hate us again.
My god I love it, Iv'e dreamt of this day for so long
Do these fools get that their whining just makes it all the more sweet  :rollin
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on September 29, 2019, 02:47:40 PM
The BF munchkins are already hard at work:

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/2019-premiership-salt-mine.1229521/

 :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: TigerLand on September 29, 2019, 03:13:04 PM
I'm so happy
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on September 29, 2019, 03:59:18 PM
The BF munchkins are already hard at work:

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/2019-premiership-salt-mine.1229521/

 :shh


Its been great reading today
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tiger Khosh on September 29, 2019, 05:03:44 PM
Being victorian I’ve always thought other vic supporters were the biggest cry babies.

Since we’ve become successful I’ve really come to appreciate how bitter and entitled the non vic supporters are and leading the pack would have to be the eagles fans. MCG granny this, 15 games at the MCG that, vic bias AFL this, poor umpiring that.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on September 29, 2019, 05:17:01 PM
2020 Grand Final
Richmond vs West Coast Eagles
Richmond wins by 37 points
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on September 30, 2019, 10:54:58 AM
I think we did OK with the umps, but I don't think it made any difference at all.

They stole a mark off Jack in the 1st Q which was criminal.

Lynch had blokes hanging off him all day.


Ultimately the FK count is lopsided because GWS were sloppy, undisciplined and threw in the towel.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: torch on September 30, 2019, 11:35:24 AM
Geelong
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: cub on September 30, 2019, 11:57:34 AM
I think we are creating a collective breakdown of all supporters now, 1 more should see plenty of them locked away in the lunatic asylum to live out their days in the fetal positon.
This is pure Gold  :cheers
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Owl on September 30, 2019, 01:51:50 PM
oh man just grab a margarita glass and head on over, Someone went to town on BF with mortein coz I have not seen so many dying blowflies HAHA
(https://img.jamieoliver.com/jamieoliver/recipe-database/oldImages/xtra_med/1198_1_1436865046.jpg?tr=w-400)
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: 1965 on September 30, 2019, 02:03:13 PM



Either I am too young to understand that or I am too old to.


Either way WTF?

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Owl on September 30, 2019, 02:08:15 PM
when kids throw tantrums they throw themselves on the floor and spin around thrashing and screaming, it's called the "dying blowfly", probably don't see as many blowies around these days I spose.  The margarita glass gets dipped in salt and makes it extra NIIIIICE  and they got plenty of it over on the Big Footy forum coz all the West Coke, Geelong and Adelaide fans are sooking it up hard.  And just a few bitter Collingwood supporters for added flavor.  Thanks for making me oldsplain my joke too ya millenial bastard.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: 1965 on September 30, 2019, 02:29:40 PM
 :cheers
BTW I turn 64 in a week.
 :snidegrin
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on September 30, 2019, 02:30:11 PM
Happy Birthday to you TT.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Owl on September 30, 2019, 05:39:04 PM
:cheers
BTW I turn 64 in a week.
 :snidegrin
LOL happy birthday then, you are older than me, still can't believe you haven't heard of kids doing a dying blowfly though
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on October 02, 2019, 11:46:46 AM
Kochie fumes over grand final injustice

News.com.au
2 Oct 2019


David Koch has hit out at the AFL over claims Richmond received unfair help at the MCG during the club’s 89-point grand final thumping of the Giants.

Port Adelaide chairman Koch, who attended the AFL grand final with rival Crows chairman Rob Chapman, said he heard the MCG scoreboard and sound system play the tiger roar, which has been used to celebrate Richmond goals during home matches at the home of football this season.

Koch is the latest high-profile voice to question the AFL’s ongoing commitment to host the biggest game of the year at the MCG, following suggestions Richmond enjoyed an unfair advantage.

The MCG resembled a Richmond home game as the vast majority of 100,014 spectators cheered on the Tigers. Boos echoed around the stadium on Saturday when the Giants first walked out onto the field.

Koch told FIVEaa Radio on Tuesday morning he is concerned by the advantages given to Melbourne-based clubs after busting the MCG scoreboard breaking neutrality in the grand final.

“I did think whenever Richmond scored a goal, I’d hear the roar of the tiger on the scoreboard,” Koch said.

“I’m not sure you’re supposed to do that when it’s a final. It’s not a Richmond home game.

He said he has spoken to AFL commission chairman Richard Goyder about his concerns.

Koch also reminded AFL chief executive Gillon McLachlan of his responsibility to promote the national game — rather than advance the cause of the game’s heartland in Melbourne suburbia.

“Gil, as I keep reminding him, comes from South Australian roots and he’s just got to keep that in mind,” Koch said.

“It’s little things like that.

“Rob (Chapman) and I and the other non-Victorian presidents just have to keep beating the drum that there is no ‘V’ in ‘AFL’ — it’s an ‘A’ now. We’ve got to be vigilant because the Victorians can get really cocky about this stuff, that’s it’s the home of football. It is not the home of football, it is a national sport that is right the way around the country.”

High profile Swans supporter and media personality Adam Spencer also spotted the moment at the MCG where Richmond’s roar was played through stadium loudspeakers.

Spencer labelled the audio support to Richmond: “Totally inappropriate”.

The AFL has already committed to play the grand final at the MCG through to the end of the 2057 season after signing a $500 million package deal with the Victorian Government.

However, there have been ongoing calls from interstate clubs for the decision to be re-evaluated.

Former Crows coach Don Pyke even told the AFL Coaches Association in 2018 to campaign for a best-of-three grand final series in the wake of his club’s grand final loss to Richmond in 2017.

https://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/port-adelaide-chairman-david-koch-hits-out-at-richmond-grand-final-advantage/news-story/5969a84cdd6fe91e6af0db81179c3507
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on October 02, 2019, 11:52:16 AM
Yes Kochie, we only won by 15 goals due to the tiger roar over the speakers :stupid  :rollin.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on October 02, 2019, 12:38:29 PM
There was both a tiger roar and a crow swooping noise after the goals in '17 and I'm pretty sure I heard the opening few bars of the GWS theme song after their three goals at the game though that might've been a trumpet player in the crowd....can't make out anything on the replay...they definitely did play it after their goals in the '17 PF.... :shh

\
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on October 02, 2019, 12:48:44 PM
Always thought the biggest insult when we were shyte was when oppo. flogs would say things like "I have a soft spot for the tiges" ... :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mat073 on October 02, 2019, 12:52:44 PM
I haven't heard much from Home and Away Chris  - where's his back handed compliment ??
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mat073 on October 02, 2019, 12:56:29 PM
I got called a d**k by a facebook friend who supports the Dockers.

I posted a meme that had Marlion Picket 1 game 1 premiership.
Fremantle dockers 555 games 0 premierships.

I thought it was hilarious 😂

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tiger Khosh on October 02, 2019, 01:22:40 PM
I got called a d**k by a facebook friend who supports the Dockers.

I posted a meme that had Marlion Picket 1 game 1 premiership.
Fremantle dockers 555 games 0 premierships.

I thought it was hilarious 😂

There’s a better one which compares Pickett to StKilda  :lol
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on October 02, 2019, 02:19:19 PM
Fume away Koch, fume away.

:) :) :)
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on October 02, 2019, 02:25:56 PM
There weren't enough GWS goals to actually work out if they played their "brass band" noise....... :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on October 02, 2019, 02:37:52 PM
Someone said on BF there was a mike in the GWS cheer squad and they played the noise through the PA..thinking back to the game that's what it sounded like....just didn't work that well... :shh

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tigeritis™©® on October 02, 2019, 07:00:59 PM
If Kochi doesn’t like the AFL competition he can round up his other interstate flogs and that Geelong muppet and start their own bloody competition.

It wasn’t the SANFL or the WAFL that expanded it was the VFL competition that expanded.

It’s because it’s our game it was born and bred here in Victoria and every other state and interstate punce can get stuffed.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: big tone on October 02, 2019, 08:03:56 PM
It’s at the G until 2057, GTFOI

Didn’t West Coast win the premiership last year?.. so it can be done, you just have to play well.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on October 02, 2019, 09:19:32 PM
The Grand Final always being held at the 'G while Richmond was garbage for 30 years:
(https://imagemacros.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/guesswhat.jpg)




Richmond suddenly wins two flags in the past three years:

(https://i.imgflip.com/2ac11r.jpg)


Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Dougeytherichmondfan on October 03, 2019, 12:35:38 PM
I would highly recommend getting over to Bomberblitz for a larf.

A LOT of rubbishing Cotchin and hoping for his demise for his "thuggish" hit on Shiel from the '17 prelim (despite Shiel being a GWS player for another season after the fact....)

https://discourse.bomberblitz.com/t/2019-grand-final-richmond-vs-gws-pathetic-little-whimper/16907/64

 :rollin
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Slipper on October 04, 2019, 07:28:32 AM
Kochie, you need to make the top 8 before you should be thinking anything to do with the grandfinal
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Owl on October 04, 2019, 06:36:35 PM
LOL they want a best of three now... what is it a war of attrition, team with least injuries by the end wins?  stuff me dead what a bunch of desperado's
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on October 05, 2019, 07:10:47 PM
Kochie, you need to make the top 8 before you should be thinking anything to do with the grandfinal
Kochie should change their theme song to 'We're never gonna stop stop stop until we're tenth tenth tenth'  :wallywink

Over the past 7 seasons, Benny Gale has helped to not only turn us around but also into a superpower. Meanwhile under Koch, Port are still stuck in the same mediocrity they were when Kochie took over in 2013.

Port has turned into Tigers of old

Michelangelo Rucci,
The Advertiser
5 Oct 2019


Port Adelaide is the old Richmond, the AFL club trapped in the “death zone” as president David Koch puts it.

Since the 2007 grand final disaster, the Power has in 12 seasons ranked 10th five times (2009, 2010, 2016, 2018 and 2019) and ninth once (2015) while the AFL has expanded to 18 teams.

And these underwhelming results come from a fully funded football program since 2013 when Koch was the AFL’s hand-picked man to stop the Port Adelaide Football Club from needing to be rebranded, relocated and refitted away from SANFL control to satisfy the AFL’s agenda.

“We have to figure out how we get out of that ‘death zone’ between seventh down to probably 13th (on the AFL ladder),” Koch said 12 months ago.

“We’re mediocre ... we’ve got to have a ruthlessness ...”

A year later, Port Adelaide is ... 10th, again. The old Richmond ninth.

...

Imagine if Koch, in his true salesman style, started Port Adelaide’s 150th anniversary next year declaring that by 2027 (the 30th year of the Power in the AFL) his club would be free of its debt ($9 million-$12 million, depending on who is counting), had 70,000 members and had won three national titles.

Many would laugh - just as they did with Richmond in 2010.

The “death zone” has a vice-like grip on Port Adelaide. Someone at Alberton - as Gale was at Punt Road - needs to be as adventurous as the club was in 1990 when it had the ambition to be in the big time.

https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl/expert-opinion/michelangelo-rucci/rucci-on-saturday-port-adelaide-has-turned-into-the-old-ninth-richmond-tigers/news-story/81de8de0325cc7138b2fa22a04e8ffe7
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on October 07, 2019, 08:41:40 PM
shelldon hanson @ShelldoHanson
every club trying every thing to come up with a way to stop the Tiger Rampage over the next 5 years from happening at least

Ricky Nixon @rickynixontoot

It will be stopped in Nov this year when AFL is forced to give them an appropriate fixture

https://twitter.com/rickynixontoot/status/1181103841833406464
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on October 07, 2019, 09:23:07 PM
Also said we wouldn't win another flag for 30 years after 2017....was only off by 28 years..... :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on October 07, 2019, 09:33:48 PM
Gotta love the Dawks wanker in the replies saying we'd shyte the bed if we had the draws they copped during their three flags....yeah it wasn't like the umpires were sucking them off every week instead of bending them over like they have us  #freekickhawthorn :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Dougeytherichmondfan on October 07, 2019, 09:55:26 PM
I love it.

The more Nixon doubts us/talks poo about us, the more confident I am about where we are at  ;D
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: georgies31 on October 09, 2019, 08:18:34 AM
Nixon is Mr Irrelevant in footy now.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on October 09, 2019, 03:14:29 PM
At the start of the season, he said we'd finish in the bottom 10 this year :stupid. Just another Richmond hater baiter. 
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: TigerLand on October 11, 2019, 12:48:53 AM
Richard Nixon is the biggest of in AFL history.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Eat_em_Alive on October 11, 2019, 07:09:12 AM
Did Chris Scott ever come out and congratulate us on our premiership win?
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Francois Jackson on October 11, 2019, 07:56:48 AM
Who cares I hope he doesn't the flog

Let's hope he is out of a job soon so we don't have to hear his teary voice anymore

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Dougeytherichmondfan on October 11, 2019, 09:32:00 AM
Did Chris Scott ever come out and congratulate us on our premiership win?
No, but he potted our 2017 flag.

Who cares I hope he doesn't the flog

Let's hope he is out of a job soon so we don't have to hear his teary voice anymore
I hope he stays. His meltdown after we knocked em out in the prelim was one of the highlights of the year. He's great entertainment, and ensure's Geelong remain pretenders.

https://www.geelongcats.com.au/video/2019-09-21/chris-scott-postmatch
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: wayne on October 11, 2019, 09:43:59 AM
How are we going to stop Stevens if they add him to their already star studded lineup.

The thing that gets lost in our flag win, is that if Tomahawk plays, they probably beat us (the 21 point H/T margin would have been at least a couple of goals more), then they would have won the flag.  :lol

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on October 11, 2019, 01:23:50 PM
Geelong is stuffed.

Ablett + Taylor finished, Selwood, Hawkins and Danger not far behind. Stevens probably beyond his prime and a little washed up.

This is a team that is desperately trying to win a flag before the inevitable rebuild, but IMO they just don't quite have the talent. I'm enjoying watching them scramble to get over the line though as it's only going to hurt them for the next decade :)
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: big tone on October 11, 2019, 08:58:50 PM
Geelong is stuffed.

Ablett + Taylor finished, Selwood, Hawkins and Danger not far behind. Stevens probably beyond his prime and a little washed up.

This is a team that is desperately trying to win a flag before the inevitable rebuild, but IMO they just don't quite have the talent. I'm enjoying watching them scramble to get over the line though as it's only going to hurt them for the next decade :)
I agree Andy.
I think they might drop down next year to 7 or 8th.
Giving Taylor another year is sad IMO.
HE IS FINISHED.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: WilliamPowell on October 12, 2019, 07:21:50 AM
Geelong is stuffed.

Ablett + Taylor finished, Selwood, Hawkins and Danger not far behind. Stevens probably beyond his prime and a little washed up.

This is a team that is desperately trying to win a flag before the inevitable rebuild, but IMO they just don't quite have the talent. I'm enjoying watching them scramble to get over the line though as it's only going to hurt them for the next decade :)
I agree Andy.
I think they might drop down next year to 7 or 8th.
Giving Taylor another year is sad IMO.
HE IS FINISHED.

What is is the saddest bit re Taylor is he thinks he can go again. He showed this season (not just against us) that the game has passed him.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on October 12, 2019, 10:11:28 AM
Players are on a good earn
 Its hard to quit and do something else which psys alot less.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: torch on October 12, 2019, 10:24:58 AM
Geelong ...

Essendon ...

Eddie McGuine ...

Adam Treloar ...
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: lamington on October 12, 2019, 01:44:17 PM
I’ve always liked Harry Taylor in his prime. He’s a victim of idiotic coaching moves like “play him forward” where he looks as awkward as me at my old year 12 formal.

He’s truly past his prime and it’s sad in a funny way seeing him get belted in the contests. Kinda like how Travis cloke stayed in the league too long
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on October 12, 2019, 06:17:32 PM
Imagine if they had to play the last 7 games away from Melbourne ? Wouldn't even made the 8. #AFLEQUALITY

https://twitter.com/Snaggersson/status/1182661747162992642

Richmond have played 13 games at the G this year and only 5 interstate. THE HOME GROUND ADVANTAGE SHOWS AND YET THE UMPIRES ARE STILL BACKING THEM #DOUBLEADVANTAGE #AFLGF

https://twitter.com/lmsja11/status/1177821455934873600

Yes! Why is this not talked about? @Richmond_FC have 11 games IN A ROW at the MCG - their home ground. Is this not a national competition? Are teams not expected to travel? Imagine if the @WestCoastEagles had 11 games IN A ROW at Optus. #FFS #WTF #rigged #Vicbias

https://twitter.com/nick_rose96/status/1177823609500229632


Too bad we didn't play 11 games in a row at the MCG and we won games in Perth, Adelaide, Gold Coast & Brisbane in a final  :wallywink.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on October 12, 2019, 06:20:18 PM
Gil VFL Coward McLachlan should help RICHmond out by letting poor RICHmond get the Captain and best player off the team that’s coming last and trying to build from scratch and make sure they don’t give up something for him too. It’s what RICHmond are ENTITLED to.

https://twitter.com/BodsMr/status/1182870591302356992
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Owl on October 12, 2019, 06:56:26 PM
The cries for help are real
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on October 12, 2019, 10:43:16 PM
Its pathetic.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on October 16, 2019, 12:37:08 AM
Nixon is Mr Irrelevant in footy now.

Looks like it's become all too much for Ricky:

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victoria/ricky-nixon-taken-to-hospital-after-threats-on-social-media/news-story/2979691c21e3ac2ae53f0168ff19967a

 :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on October 16, 2019, 09:34:43 AM
Probably the trade period, looking at all these commissions he won't be pocketing etc
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Hard Roar Tiger on October 16, 2019, 10:46:31 PM
Could tell you some stories about Ricky but I couldn’t be bothered
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on October 16, 2019, 10:48:15 PM
Think a few here could... :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Owl on October 17, 2019, 12:29:57 PM
I could tell you some real corkers, but I would be just making em up
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on October 17, 2019, 12:46:48 PM
Three weeks after the Grand Final and trade period just completed yet Kane Cornes is still sooking about us and our "disgraceful" fixture this year :nopity. Today he even added we should have been made to play West Coast and Brisbane at Marvel :facepalm. Yeah Kane, good luck fitting the 70k crowd that turned up to the Brisbane game at Docklands :stupid  :rollin.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mat073 on October 17, 2019, 01:57:04 PM
Kane is just a massive troll.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Dougeytherichmondfan on October 17, 2019, 02:12:57 PM
Three weeks after the Grand Final and trade period just completed yet Kane Cornes is still sooking about us and our "disgraceful" fixture this year :nopity. Today he even added we should have been made to play West Coast and Brisbane at Marvel :facepalm. Yeah Kane, good luck fitting the 70k crowd that turned up to the Brisbane game at Docklands :stupid  :rollin.
Hypocrisy at its finest. On the one hand, Cornes and every other SA demand that the GF should be a home game, played on a home ground for the higher finishing team and not the 'G every year.

They also whinge that interstate teams should get more games on the G, instead of having to play games in Tassie/Darwin/Ballarat/Marvel.

BUT lets write a rule specifically that says if the best team in the comp is an MCG tennant, they shouldn't be able to play home games on their home ground, but on neutral venues.

He is laughably bad. I know his schtick is to be "controversial" - but everyone and especially industry commentators just laugh (mostly behind his back but sometimes to his face) at how pathetic, reactionary and small town his takes are.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on October 18, 2019, 03:46:13 AM
Quote from: Vesty
Vesty's bottom 5 premiers since 2000.

1: Tie (Richmond 2019 & Hawthorn 2015)

Too hard to split the obvious winners of this accolade. Richmond 2019 were a horrendous football team who were absolutely kissed on the **** in every way possible from the mid point of the season onwards. Once again they had nobody on the injury or suspension list come September and faced off against opponents who the afl and injury gods ensured were crippled. Even then it took bias umpiring and rule changes made to suit their game plan (6/6/6) and not leaving the G for the last 3 months of the season in order for them to get over the line.

2: Richmond 2017

One of the least talented premiership winning sides of all time. The side literally had Dustin Martin, Alex Rance and a bunch of absolute scrubbers who could chase and tackle. The AFL ensured the "fairy tale" ground breaker with strict instructions for the umpires to look after the Tigers at all opportunities throughout the final series and the AFL themselves ensured that the Tigers would never leave their cheat ground despite them finishing lower on the ladder than two of their opponents.

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/vestys-bottom-5-premiers-since-2000.1230275/page-3#post-63399528

Quote from: Vesty
If Geelong were given home finals would they have won the 14, 16, 17 & 19 flags comfortably.

I am convinced that 100% they would have won at least 3 of the above 4 flags. Let’s look at it more forensically however:

2014:
Geelong v North Melbourne. Would have been an absolute walk in the park for the cats as north were the 7th- 8th best side in it that year and we had smashed them convincingly throughout the year. Instead we are forced to play in their home city and they get over the line in a close one. Believe we would have gone on to belt Sydney and then had another crack against the hawks in the GF. Prognosis: 50% likelihood.

2016:
Qualifying final. Won by a kick against he hawks. Should have been a much easier game down at Kardinia. Prelim final: here is where we were really robbed. Had won 7 of 8 home games throughout the season and would have started unbackable favourites in this match. Absolutely no doubt in my mind we win this game and go on to demolish the dogs.

2017:
Had comprehensively smashed out direct opponent at Simmonds stadium a couple of weeks before finals and had a number of elite players returning to the side. Instead we play the side that finished 3rd in their cheat ground in front of their fans who bought our tickets in the ballot and with their home town umpiring decisions. Absolutely 100% certain if the game was at gmhba we win. Would go on to demolish our bunnies the giants and crows. 100% certainty

2019
Finished top and had to play 4th on their cheat ground then had to back it up with away game against the eagles and an away game against the 3rd placed side also in their cheat ground. Lost both our qualifying and prelim by a bees dick with some dodgy decisions and biased crowds. With an even run at it we would have been absolute morals to make the GF and belt up on the bye that was GWS in the grand final.

Overall I think it is safe to say at least 3 more flags would be in the coffers (probably 4) if the afl sorted out inequality of making us play away from home in finals

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/if-geelong-were-given-home-finals-would-they-have-won-the-14-16-17-19-flags-comfortably.1230813/

I'm surprised he didn't bring up 1967, 69 and 80 as well  :lol.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: cub on October 18, 2019, 07:28:16 AM
Quote from: Vesty
Vesty's bottom 5 premiers since 2000.

1: Tie (Richmond 2019 & Hawthorn 2015)

Too hard to split the obvious winners of this accolade. Richmond 2019 were a horrendous football team who were absolutely kissed on the **** in every way possible from the mid point of the season onwards. Once again they had nobody on the injury or suspension list come September and faced off against opponents who the afl and injury gods ensured were crippled. Even then it took bias umpiring and rule changes made to suit their game plan (6/6/6) and not leaving the G for the last 3 months of the season in order for them to get over the line.

2: Richmond 2017

One of the least talented premiership winning sides of all time. The side literally had Dustin Martin, Alex Rance and a bunch of absolute scrubbers who could chase and tackle. The AFL ensured the "fairy tale" ground breaker with strict instructions for the umpires to look after the Tigers at all opportunities throughout the final series and the AFL themselves ensured that the Tigers would never leave their cheat ground despite them finishing lower on the ladder than two of their opponents.

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/vestys-bottom-5-premiers-since-2000.1230275/page-3#post-63399528

Quote from: Vesty
If Geelong were given home finals would they have won the 14, 16, 17 & 19 flags comfortably.

I am convinced that 100% they would have won at least 3 of the above 4 flags. Let’s look at it more forensically however:

2014:
Geelong v North Melbourne. Would have been an absolute walk in the park for the cats as north were the 7th- 8th best side in it that year and we had smashed them convincingly throughout the year. Instead we are forced to play in their home city and they get over the line in a close one. Believe we would have gone on to belt Sydney and then had another crack against the hawks in the GF. Prognosis: 50% likelihood.

2016:
Qualifying final. Won by a kick against he hawks. Should have been a much easier game down at Kardinia. Prelim final: here is where we were really robbed. Had won 7 of 8 home games throughout the season and would have started unbackable favourites in this match. Absolutely no doubt in my mind we win this game and go on to demolish the dogs.

2017:
Had comprehensively smashed out direct opponent at Simmonds stadium a couple of weeks before finals and had a number of elite players returning to the side. Instead we play the side that finished 3rd in their cheat ground in front of their fans who bought our tickets in the ballot and with their home town umpiring decisions. Absolutely 100% certain if the game was at gmhba we win. Would go on to demolish our bunnies the giants and crows. 100% certainty

2019
Finished top and had to play 4th on their cheat ground then had to back it up with away game against the eagles and an away game against the 3rd placed side also in their cheat ground. Lost both our qualifying and prelim by a bees dick with some dodgy decisions and biased crowds. With an even run at it we would have been absolute morals to make the GF and belt up on the bye that was GWS in the grand final.

Overall I think it is safe to say at least 3 more flags would be in the coffers (probably 4) if the afl sorted out inequality of making us play away from home in finals

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/if-geelong-were-given-home-finals-would-they-have-won-the-14-16-17-19-flags-comfortably.1230813/

I'm surprised he didn't bring up 1967, 69 and 80 as well  :lol.

This Vesty needs professional help
I knew we could do it  :rollin - 1 more and they will all be in the fetal position if they arent already
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on October 18, 2019, 08:29:57 AM
2017 the free kick count was 17 to 15 our way. Hardly evidence of bias.

We kicked 13 goals to 5 with 7 goals to 1 in the final quarter.

Tough to make a case that Geelong should have won that one. They had their chance and wilted
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Chuck17 on October 18, 2019, 08:41:46 AM
Is Vesty Catman? You know the one who threw a tanty on camera in 2017.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Dougeytherichmondfan on October 18, 2019, 09:22:52 AM
I love the "comprehensively smashed" comment regarding out late season match up in 2017. My memory says the 14 point margin flattered them (albeit Selwood and Clangerfield didn't play).

Overall, that's 11/10 salt.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mat073 on October 18, 2019, 02:19:59 PM
We lost Caddy early in that game and still had spuds like C. Ellis in the team.
Towner came in the following week and exploded.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Darth Tiger on October 18, 2019, 05:10:33 PM
I like this Vesty, probably still drinking the liquor burner coolant from the closed Point Henry Aluminium smelter.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Darth Tiger on October 18, 2019, 05:14:24 PM
Is Vesty Catman? You know the one who threw a tanty on camera in 2017.

https://au.sports.yahoo.com/catman-throws-epic-tantrum-after-taylor-hits-poster-37014644.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAANF7orq5juwY-D-yEi8MQc6h0_-RAp1mM-KxI33IR6lxgVn-LgV12FCUtLcn35LLqNSQ3W3gSgSTQS-PNpxtJyEiOWMAsuzMPcJuZb0aSLJ04MTfaz9iFObR7llsIS7bsfcRL3d-wa1CK5ckzgWfduaRToXvC4_ixk0VZqohTnTF
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Chuck17 on October 18, 2019, 10:06:27 PM
Is Vesty Catman? You know the one who threw a tanty on camera in 2017.

https://au.sports.yahoo.com/catman-throws-epic-tantrum-after-taylor-hits-poster-37014644.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAANF7orq5juwY-D-yEi8MQc6h0_-RAp1mM-KxI33IR6lxgVn-LgV12FCUtLcn35LLqNSQ3W3gSgSTQS-PNpxtJyEiOWMAsuzMPcJuZb0aSLJ04MTfaz9iFObR7llsIS7bsfcRL3d-wa1CK5ckzgWfduaRToXvC4_ixk0VZqohTnTF

Yeh that’s him
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on October 20, 2019, 02:06:13 PM
So for in order for us to be regarded as legitimate premiership side in the eyes of oppo flogs we need to somehow:

- play only 10 matches a year the MCG and win all our away games

- win every game by at least 10 goals but also by a kick to prove we can handle pressure (esp. the GF)

- lose every free kick count by 20

- don't recruit any more good players

- have half our list out injured or suspended including all our top players, while every opponent is at full-strength

- have our entire midfield and our rebounding defenders tagged every game

- fiinish undefeated minor premiers but also outside the top 4 and play all finals away inc the GF  but still beat Collingwood at some point

 Only then can we call ourselves true premiers.... :shh

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on October 20, 2019, 03:59:25 PM
continued ...

- All Richmond supporters to be banned from attending matches. Not fair they have the largest crowds.

- All Richmond memberships to be made null and void. Not fair they have the most members by far.

- Richmond to be banned from free agency, trade period as well as the National, rookie, supplementary preseason and midseason drafts as part of equalisation.

- Richmond's H/A season must be 22 straight interstate games to make the fixture fair.

- If Richmond still finish top then all finals played at a "neutral" venue like the Moon or Metricon where there's atmosphere.

- Dusty has to swap sides at half-time or whenever the opposition is trailing (whichever comes first) to make games fairer.

- If despite all that Richmond still win the premiership then they have to hand the cup over to the runners-up as clearly they must have gained an unknown and unheard advantage yet to be made up by bitter and jealous opposition supporters.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on October 20, 2019, 04:33:25 PM
 :shh :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on October 20, 2019, 05:27:54 PM
When the history books are written they will show the winners, the scores, the goalkickers, the best players and the crowd number. It will also show Richmond won its 12th Premiership in 2019. Everything else is worthless. Dont know why our supporters get into those debates on big footy. Theres no need.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Hard Roar Tiger on October 20, 2019, 08:05:16 PM
And that we’ve won as many flags in the past 3 years that those tragic Pies have won in over 60 years
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Francois Jackson on October 20, 2019, 11:16:26 PM
When the history books are written they will show the winners, the scores, the goalkickers, the best players and the crowd number. It will also show Richmond won its 12th Premiership in 2019. Everything else is worthless. Dont know why our supporters get into those debates on big footy. Theres no need.

100%

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on October 21, 2019, 03:01:38 AM
It's not just one website. The sooking is right across the net from opposition club fan forums to multi-sport forums  :lol.

Quote from: penrith eagle
Quote from: Crazy Dazz
But the overwhelming thing that stood out today, was just how well Richmond play the MCG.
They have player 27 regular season games there over the past two seasons. That's just not acceptable if you are going to insist that all Victorian finals be played there.
27 games played at the same venue....could you imagine if we played 27 games at optus...we would be unbeatable

https://www.eaglesflyinghigh.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=17869

Yet the Eagles did play 27 games at Optus over the past two seasons :stupid.

23 of them were also genuine non-derby home games against travelling interstate clubs including three finals.

Compare that to just our 8 non-derby home games against travelling interstate clubs including one final (this year's GF in which we were the highest ranked team).


Quote from: Jack A
The 2017 flag is tainted. When I use that word it means that it doesn’t carry as much weight as flags won by non-mcg tenants (especially interstate clubs when playing an MCG tenant but also any Vic club).

Cats should have hosted the Pies and they probably would have won and had a week off. Hawkins wouldn’t be suspended and it would have been a Cats v Tigers GF at the Cats home and they probably would have won seeing Tigers only won 55% of away games this year and two of those “away games” were at the MCG.

Posted: October 20th 2019 @ 2:37am

https://www.theroar.com.au/2019/10/19/ten-under-10-ten-players-in-for-a-bounce-back-in-2020/
Now Cat fans want a GF at Kardinia Park  :lol. Nothing says biggest and most important match of the year like only a 23k crowd at a Granny  :wallywink.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Dougeytherichmondfan on October 21, 2019, 01:54:42 PM
It's not just one website. The sooking is right across the net from opposition club fan forums to multi-sport forums  :lol.

Quote from: penrith eagle
Quote from: Crazy Dazz
But the overwhelming thing that stood out today, was just how well Richmond play the MCG.
They have player 27 regular season games there over the past two seasons. That's just not acceptable if you are going to insist that all Victorian finals be played there.
27 games played at the same venue....could you imagine if we played 27 games at optus...we would be unbeatable

https://www.eaglesflyinghigh.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=17869

Yet the Eagles did play 27 games at Optus over the past two seasons :stupid.

23 of them were also genuine non-derby home games against travelling interstate clubs including three finals.

Compare that to just our 8 non-derby home games against travelling interstate clubs including one final (this year's GF in which we were the highest ranked team).

The Eagles wanting asterisks' next to flags is a quite the larf.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: lamington on October 21, 2019, 04:46:33 PM
I find it comical with the selective memory of all the anti Richmond potatoes out there. So much commentary on “they had a dream run with injuries leading into finals.” And their point? Did they forget the number of times we had to basically field our vfl team ? It makes me happy that with the rest of the comp trying to distort the facts and breaking down the quantum maths of how we were able to win 2 flags in 3 years when the answer is quite simple. This is a stuffing good team at the moment and it’s a great time to be a tiger
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Francois Jackson on October 24, 2019, 07:18:46 AM
We should stop posting other Teeny bopper comments on here that try bring down our great club

I don't mind if it's coaches (like Scott) or players but this  other stuff is putrid

Tigers are hated and so were the hawks in the golden era

It's a great time to be alive :gotigers

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Owl on October 24, 2019, 11:41:28 AM
It's not just one website. The sooking is right across the net from opposition club fan forums to multi-sport forums  :lol.

Quote from: penrith eagle
Quote from: Crazy Dazz
But the overwhelming thing that stood out today, was just how well Richmond play the MCG.
They have player 27 regular season games there over the past two seasons. That's just not acceptable if you are going to insist that all Victorian finals be played there.
27 games played at the same venue....could you imagine if we played 27 games at optus...we would be unbeatable

https://www.eaglesflyinghigh.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=17869

Yet the Eagles did play 27 games at Optus over the past two seasons :stupid.

23 of them were also genuine non-derby home games against travelling interstate clubs including three finals.

Compare that to just our 8 non-derby home games against travelling interstate clubs including one final (this year's GF in which we were the highest ranked team).

The Eagles wanting asterisks' next to flags is a quite the larf.
I have an asterix next to theirs.  Everyone plays better with a bit of Columbian marching powder in their nostrils.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on November 06, 2019, 03:29:30 AM
Scott Dooley @scottdools

AFL: We've created the most balanced and fair draw in the history of the game.

Also the AFL: Richmond will play 23 games at the MCG and kick to the Punt Rd end every quarter.

https://twitter.com/scottdools/status/1189649937849573377

Andrew Cowell @clubandrew

Not great for @WestCoastEaglesor @HawthornFC @bunyiplobesy.

@Richmond_FC ranking screams of #VicBias

https://twitter.com/clubandrew/status/1190171531764289536

Ricky Nixon @rickynixontoot

Richmond are not clearly the best they had the best run at the end aided by 7 games at the G no injuries apart from Rance......Jack Martin will star for Geelong Josh Jenkin exactly what they need and as for WCE my mail is all is not happy with the coin Kelly is getting

Best team or best Charity

Bombed out in a prelim by 10 goals the had the greatest charity fixture in world sport last year and still finished 3rd on the ladder thats who i'm kidding with facts

so getting 10 of the last 11 games at the MCG including in the first 10 rounds playing 8 bottom 10 teams ok got it #Dreamer

In 37 years again - guess what you have a real fixture in 2020 not a charity fixture

https://twitter.com/rickynixontoot
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: georgies31 on November 06, 2019, 08:21:41 AM
Say once again Ricky has become Mr Irrelevant in football.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on November 06, 2019, 08:52:15 AM
Nixon is almost incoherent. Must be back on the gear or unwell...
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: cub on November 06, 2019, 09:19:06 AM
I really dont get why anyone pays or gives Nixon any attention,wierd!

Some West coast supporters have really lost the plot, but really they are only nuffies on forums, just good lol value really.

In the end this is what we all were waiting for, the Giant is awake and the fear is real!
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Dougeytherichmondfan on November 06, 2019, 10:21:09 AM
Ricky stays relevant by spewing his vile takes and trolling Richmond supporters. As pathetic as he seems, he's just desperate to stay relevant, and it seems to be keeping him afloat.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on November 09, 2019, 03:27:54 AM
Quote from: @AFL
Kane Lambert and why the Tiges were unstoppable after the bye.

Take a deep dive into @richmondfc's season by the numbers in The Data Game.

https://twitter.com/AFL/status/1180381652842766342 

Plenty of sooky replies to this AFL tweet  :wallywink:

Quote from: @TheGasman15
Maybe not leaving the MCG might’ve helped...congrats Gil for bringing it home to Victoria and giving the Tigers the easiest GF ever...Free ride #tigershandedcup

Quote from: joe bloggs @thedeputydog80
Because of the draw you gave them.

Quote from: Spud Allen @JohnAll27916285
All games were at their MCG #homegames the other two : Stkilda at Marvel & Goldcoast at Metricon
#Fakechampions #VAFL
It's not rocket science 😂 😂 😂

Quote from: Thomas Grose 🇦🇺 @tom_grose02
Because they had 7 games at MCG after the bye
   
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on November 10, 2019, 03:41:05 AM
Some disturbed opposition supporters out there. Especially the Crows fan below  :stupid.

Quote from: AFL
Four clubs have been fined for breaching rules related to players' whereabouts.

https://www.afl.com.au/news/2019-11-07/blues-fined-10k-three-others-sanctioned-for-breach-of-drug-code

Quote from: Boris Krešić @borris_k
Same old Richmond, always cheating

Quote from: Rhino @rhino1517
Richmond again they always get fined for this. This is like the fourth time it’s happened maybe a more substantial penalty would be better

Quote from: Rob C @Crocka1976
Take the flag off the cheats! Lol let the games begin !!!!

Quote from: @WillSheppard82
Any chance ASADA could fine Richmond 90 points from the Grand Final so my Giants could win by 1? #CantHurtToAsk

Quote from: AFC Fan 4EVA @4eva_fan
Unbelievable. Richmond. Again fined. Where there is smoke there is fire and it's clear why they are so good. Too bad the AFL and the Vic bias so they'll look after Richmond and won't investigate them properly.

Quote from: AFC Fan 4EVA @4eva_fan
Clearly Richmond were on drugs and that's why they won in 2017. Maybe the AFL even sanctioned it because they love there Vic bias.

Quote from: BJPW @bjpw25
Yeah drugs and all the games at MCG

https://twitter.com/AFL/status/1192329878353281024
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: georgies31 on November 10, 2019, 08:07:22 AM
https://twitter.com/triplemfooty/status/1193009917830909954

Laughable this crap Joey just keeps embarrassing himself  :rollin
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on November 10, 2019, 12:07:26 PM
Whilst those comments are stupid it is true in my opinion that our club needs to do better on this issue.weve been fined before. Its a bad look imo.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on November 10, 2019, 02:39:09 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EI5sMaBU4AEZDU9?format=jpg&name=900x900)

https://twitter.com/triplemfooty/status/1193009917830909954

Laughable this crap Joey just keeps embarrassing himself  :rollin
And Montagna would know this from all those flags he won at St Kilda ... oh wait!  :rollin

Actually, this mentality probably shows why they never won one. Champions and champion teams don't need external motivation. For some, once you taste success you want even more and more. There's the never-ending pursuit of perfection and trying to top and better what you did before. We haven't won back-to-back or threepeats like Hawthorn and Brisbane.

Joey, there's a whole book on the current Richmond mentality, what it means to be a "Richmond man" and what has made us tick since the end of 2016. You should read it rather than making stupid clickbait. There's a love for each other that drives the Club. Each individual is important and special and makes us a better team and club. It's why every Tiger player ran out after the final siren wearing their jumper. Even players that are leaving we try to do what is best for them. It's why Ellis and Butler got to their clubs of choice with no fuss. You don't think those who ran out on Grand Final day aren't thinking of Rance, Graham, Higgins, Stack, Kmac, Ross and co. who missed out on this flag and are wanting to get back there again next year for them.

ps. The irony of Montagna's comment is if Dimma did need to find external motivation then Joey has just provided it  :wallywink.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on November 10, 2019, 03:01:56 PM
Whilst those comments are stupid it is true in my opinion that our club needs to do better on this issue.weve been fined before. Its a bad look imo.
For us it was one player. It could simply be a case of that player telling the club he was going to be in this one location on his holidays and at the last minute things got changed and he ended up somewhere else. It's sloppy but hardly a hanging offence.

As for that crazed Adelaide fan, he would know about players going missing unexpectedly. Happened to the Crows after that power stance during national anthem on Grand Final day 2017  :rollin.

As for his twitter feed: He clearly doesn't have both oars in the water :help.

Quote from: AFC Fan 4EVA @4eva_fan
That win last night was one of the greatest in the history of the AFL. We are the greatest and mentally strongest teams in the AFL. What night and what a club. Even though the Victorian bias umpires tried to cheat, we were too good.
#weflyasone
9:01 AM · Jun 2, 2019·Twitter for Android

https://twitter.com/4eva_fan/status/1134958052757495808
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on November 10, 2019, 11:04:59 PM
Every goal from Tom Lynch in 2019: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KeArpBVyM0Q

Quote from: Disney Channel Fanboy
What a traitor, leaves Gold Coast just so he can get himself attention at Richmond, can’t wait til he gets injured.

Quote from: Disney Channel Fanboy
Useless player, just stands at Full Forward and does nothing, if you think that he’d beat Sicily in a one on one, you need to see a psychologist.


Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on November 11, 2019, 01:38:19 PM
Every goal from Tom Lynch in 2019: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KeArpBVyM0Q

Quote from: Disney Channel Fanboy
What a traitor, leaves Gold Coast just so he can get himself attention at Richmond, can’t wait til he gets injured.

Quote from: Disney Channel Fanboy
Useless player, just stands at Full Forward and does nothing, if you think that he’d beat Sicily in a one on one, you need to see a psychologist.




Great clip. His contested marking is a thing of beauty and he has a great kicking action.

Also note that he got SFA goals from free kicks, unlike Wankerfield
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: wayne on November 11, 2019, 04:24:44 PM


Quote from: Disney Channel Fanboy
Useless player, just stands at Full Forward and does nothing, if you think that he’d beat Sicily in a one on one, you need to see a psychologist.

 :lol

Enjoy Patton and Lewis Hawk fans  :lol
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Dougeytherichmondfan on November 11, 2019, 04:38:28 PM
Every goal from Tom Lynch in 2019: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KeArpBVyM0Q

Quote from: Disney Channel Fanboy
What a traitor, leaves Gold Coast just so he can get himself attention at Richmond, can’t wait til he gets injured.

Quote from: Disney Channel Fanboy
Useless player, just stands at Full Forward and does nothing, if you think that he’d beat Sicily in a one on one, you need to see a psychologist.




Great clip. His contested marking is a thing of beauty and he has a great kicking action.

Also note that he got SFA goals from free kicks, unlike Wankerfield
What about that free he got in the Prelim at the top of the goalsquare to put us ahead.

 :whistle :whistle

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tiger Khosh on November 11, 2019, 05:58:30 PM
Every goal from Tom Lynch in 2019: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KeArpBVyM0Q

Quote from: Disney Channel Fanboy
What a traitor, leaves Gold Coast just so he can get himself attention at Richmond, can’t wait til he gets injured.

Quote from: Disney Channel Fanboy
Useless player, just stands at Full Forward and does nothing, if you think that he’d beat Sicily in a one on one, you need to see a psychologist.




Great clip. His contested marking is a thing of beauty and he has a great kicking action.

Also note that he got SFA goals from free kicks, unlike Wankerfield
What about that free he got in the Prelim at the top of the goalsquare to put us ahead.

 :whistle :whistle

He marked that ball anyway  :rollin
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Dougeytherichmondfan on November 11, 2019, 08:48:30 PM
Oh, TK.....

:facepalm :facepalm
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on November 18, 2019, 12:56:41 AM
From a Geelong supporter.

Quote from: Seeds
I'm coping so much poo from Richmond supporters right now. Not hawks supporters. Effing Richmond supporters. And I have no valid come backs thanks to Scott and the fact we have become a finals laughing stock due to his annual bizarro finals team selections moves and soft defensive game plan. Its causing deep mental distress. Effing Richmond supporters.

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/chris-scott-re-signs-to-2022-aka-the-chris-scott-discussion-part-iv.1202552/post-63642848
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: cub on November 18, 2019, 09:34:54 PM
Lmao a thing of beauty
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on November 19, 2019, 01:59:24 AM
Quote from: @HenryJrJr
Richmond has a great top 6 but levels off pretty quick after that. Its their radical gamestyle that has won the flags not the quality of the list. Other clubs cant handle their gameplan

Quote from: @beckben66
Gee there's some average players in this list, in fact most of the list haha

9:41 AM · Nov 16, 2019 (https://twitter.com/HenryJrJr/status/1195471871275257856)
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: wayne on November 19, 2019, 03:45:01 PM
 :lol

Cat supporters??

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on November 20, 2019, 01:28:35 AM
Ashley Moore @ashmoore69 Replying to @RalphyHeraldSun

Why is the pies salary cap an issue but Richmonds is not?
Lynch and Dusty both on a mill a year.
Rance, Cotchin and Jack all close.


https://twitter.com/ashmoore69/status/1194184893405655041
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: cub on November 21, 2019, 04:24:03 PM
Geez it runs deep
Wankley just now on SEN on a bit of a dodgy no ball decision
“Gee this isn’t run by the AFL is it”
Love the tears, keep em
Coming 🐅🏆🏆
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on November 21, 2019, 06:04:35 PM
No-one despises the pencil-necked flog more than me but I doubt that was a shot at Richmond.... :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mat073 on November 21, 2019, 10:49:20 PM
Quote from: @HenryJrJr
Richmond has a great top 6 but levels off pretty quick after that. Its their radical gamestyle that has won the flags not the quality of the list. Other clubs cant handle their gameplan

Quote from: @beckben66
Gee there's some average players in this list, in fact most of the list haha

9:41 AM · Nov 16, 2019 (https://twitter.com/HenryJrJr/status/1195471871275257856)

Not this nonsense again...

That's why the win against Port in round 4 was so special.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on November 22, 2019, 01:44:24 AM
Carlton supporter.

Quote from: Vo Rogue
Never have fans suffered an era when the afl's most dominant team of the time been as insufferable as the present. I long for the days when Hawthorn were winning premiership after premiership.

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/without-a-woman-in-charge-would-richmond-have-embraced-mindfulness-and-been-successful.1232374/#post-63688398
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on November 22, 2019, 06:38:16 PM
Quote from: Jack A
Does on a “good day” mean at the MCG?

WC thrashed the Tigers at Optus in 2018. The Tigers were losing most away games in 2017-2018, off memory it was 5-6 away losses in a row. Even in 2019 they only won 55% of away games and two of them were against fellow MCG tenants.

Quote from: Neil from Warrandyte
“Even in 2019 they only won 55% of their away games and 2 of them were against fellow MCG tenants”
Actually they ‘only’ won 67% of their away games in 2019.
West Coast on the other hand won 58% of their away games including 1 against a fellow Optus Oval tenant.
Do you just make this stuff up??

Quote from: Jack A
Maths obviously isn’t a strength amongst Tiger fans.

Fortunately B Gale knows basic arithmetic and how lucky he is to have friends in high places that look after his boys.

Tigers won 55% of away games in the H&A 2019.

Tigers won a measly 20% of games on the road (interstate) against weak opposition bar one (Giants).

Total Away Games = 11
Total Away Win/Loss = 6/5 (55%)

Interstate Games = 5
Interstate Win/Loss = 1/4 (20%)

MCG “Away/Home” Games = 3
MCG “Away/Home” Wins = 3 (100%) – no surprise there – Tigers live the MCG and the VFL/AFL and awoke fans know it.

Marvel “Away” Games = 3
Marvel “Away” Win/Loss = 1/2 (33%) – just down the road and against weak opposition.

Tigers @ Marvel beat the Saints and lost to North and Dogs – 1 x Finalist (8th).

Tigers @ MCG beat the Blues, Demons and Pies (Blues and Dees lol) – 1 x Finalist.

Tigers interstate beat the “SUNS” and LOST to Freo, Crows, Port and Giants – 1 x Finalist.

Out of 11 away games the Tigers only played 2 against Top 4 teams (WC played 4) and Tigers won 1 (MCG) and lost 1 (50%) and they only played away against 3 x Top 8 teams in total for 1 win (33%).

Tigers have a terrible away record – gifted fixture and tainted flags if ever there was – but you won’t hear that on the nightly news!

R1 – Blues – MCG – won
R3 – Giants – lost
R4 – Port – lost
R7 – Dogs – Marvel – lost
R8 – Freo – won
R11 – North – Marvel – lost
R13 – Crows – lost
R15 – Saints – Marvel – won
R16 – Suns – won
R19 – Pies – MCG – won
R20 – Dees – MCG – won

Now let’s look at the Eagles away record…

Total Away Games = 11
Total Away Win/Loss = 6/5 (55%) – same as Tigers but much tougher away opponents and venues.

Interstate Games = 10
Interstate Win/Loss = 6/4 (40%) – Tigers (20%).

West Coast @ MCG beat the Pies and Hawks and lost to Tigers by 6 points.

That’s 2 x Top 4 sides with a 50% strike rate (away) and only went down to the “premiers” by one goal on their home deck.

Out of 11 away games West Coast played 4 against Top 4 teams (Tigers 2) and won 1 (25%).

Clearly, West Coast had the tougher draw and yet they still creamed the Tigers in true away win/loss when you factor in quality of opposition and venue.

R1 – Lions (Gabba) – lost
R3 – Pies (MCG) – won
R6 – Cats (GMBHA) – lost
R8 – Saints – won
R10 – Crows – won
R12 – Sydney – lost
R15 – Hawks – won
R16 – Freo – won
R18 – Demons – won
R20 – Blues – won
R22 – Tigers – lost

Now that I’ve had time to reflect – Longmire has been a better coach than Dimma this decade.

Clarko, Simmo, Horse, Dimma in that order.

Quote from: RichieTiger
When you accuse others of not being strong in maths, you want to pretty sure you have your figures right. Richmond beat Port and Freo interstate. That makes it 60%. Add in finals and it is 4 out if 6 games or 67%. Did any other club do better?
Perhaps you should have had some sleep instead of posting garbage in the middle of the night.

Quote from: Jack A
I’d have Simmo ahead of Dimma. 2 x GF’s against the lower ranked team with the game played on their opponents home ground for one win.

Clarko is clearly in front even with his home ground advantage as he made 4 x GF’s.

Quote from: Jack A
Read my latest post (if it passed moderation) above. The numbers speak for themselves.

Tigers have been given a gifted fixture.

Interstate clubs like WC generally have it much harder. WC finished 5th last year and almost all pundits acknowledge that WC has the toughest 2020 fixture – no surprise there!

https://www.theroar.com.au/2019/11/19/the-afls-coach-of-the-decade-clarkson-vs-hardwick/

One bitter Eagles supporter :stupid :lol.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tiger Khosh on November 22, 2019, 07:31:47 PM
What did he say after it was pointed out that we beat both port and freo?

Like I said on another thread a while back iv always hated other vic teams over interstate teams due to having to listen to their crap first hand. But with social media and websites such as theroar you really come to realise how the interstate fans love to play the victim card and bring up “vic bias” when discussing literally any topic.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on November 23, 2019, 02:21:38 AM
What did he say after it was pointed out that we beat both port and freo?
He didn't reply.

Like I said on another thread a while back iv always hated other vic teams over interstate teams due to having to listen to their crap first hand. But with social media and websites such as theroar you really come to realise how the interstate fans love to play the victim card and bring up “vic bias” when discussing literally any topic.
While they ignore the advantage their team gets playing 10 real home games against travelling sides compared to say our 3 which gives them an easier chance to finish higher on the ladder ::).

"Kick a Vic" has always been a SA & WA past time since the old state games before the AFL era. It must though be a modern shock to their system that a club that they've all been use to being crap since the comp. went national is now the biggest club in the land and dominating on-field. Us being a juggernaut with our ability to fill the 'G with 95k Tiger supporters and our incredible record at the 'G must feel like playing a state side when they play us.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Hard Roar Tiger on November 23, 2019, 10:57:49 PM
This is a really good point MT. We got nearly 60k vs Eages and 70+ vs Lions so the fortress is at least as intimidating as those grounds in SA and WA
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on November 23, 2019, 11:14:55 PM
Its just jealousy. Thats all.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on November 24, 2019, 07:47:12 PM
This is a really good point MT. We got nearly 60k vs Eages and 70+ vs Lions so the fortress is at least as intimidating as those grounds in SA and WA
Yep. We average home crowds of 60k which is virtually double than what more than half of the competition gets to their home crowds. No wonder they fear us and are jealous of us.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Owl on November 27, 2019, 05:30:48 PM
haha what a desperado
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on November 27, 2019, 06:49:51 PM
The start of draft night is always good when you're reigning premiers. It's the first official AFL meeting since the GF so Gill will congratulate us. Is Chris Scott in the room?  ;D
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: cub on November 27, 2019, 08:20:48 PM
The start of draft night is always good when you're reigning premiers. It's the first official AFL meeting since the GF so Gill will congratulate us. Is Chris Scott in the room?  ;D
Probably not because it’s an away game 🤪
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: WilliamPowell on November 27, 2019, 08:23:40 PM
The start of draft night is always good when you're reigning premiers. It's the first official AFL meeting since the GF so Gill will congratulate us. Is Chris Scott in the room?  ;D
Probably not because it’s an away game 🤪

 :rollin :ROTFL
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on November 28, 2019, 12:46:24 PM
The start of draft night is always good when you're reigning premiers. It's the first official AFL meeting since the GF so Gill will congratulate us. Is Chris Scott in the room?  ;D
Probably not because it’s an away game 🤪
:lol


ps. By the way, Gill forgot to congratulate us last night  :huh.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on November 28, 2019, 02:54:42 PM
Thats a disgrace as well. The AFL hates Richmond. Always have. Its us against the rest.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: WilliamPowell on November 28, 2019, 03:26:38 PM

ps. By the way, Gill forgot to congratulate us last night  :huh.

Seeing it's going over 2 days and he will probably need to fill up time tonight so they can drag it out for 6 hours for Fox Footy, he may mention it tonight  :eyebrow
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on November 28, 2019, 04:04:48 PM
I doubt it... :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on December 03, 2019, 02:51:53 PM
Quote from: AFL
Can @Richmond_FC go back-to-back in 2020?

Quote from: @GRIMLOCKCRUSH
Nah, they blew that chance in 2018. They'll be countered next year far more teams than before. Clubs have had 3 years to shut them down, it'll happen next year you watch.

Quote from: @pies_forever
If Collingwood keep gifting them an easy ride in the granny then yes......

...

Didn’t say it was an easy ride to get there. Richmond were frothing that GWS made it. If we had won (which we didn’t because we were poor) Richmond would’ve had a challenge and not just a fun day of “how much can we win by”

...

Our weakness is clearly rain. If Richmond could choose, they would’ve chosen GWS, because they know we would have given them a challenge. Give us a dry, sunny grand final and we’re at our best. Everyone would agree it was easy for them. But deserving in the end

https://twitter.com/AFL/status/1201298854643040256
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on December 06, 2019, 03:27:09 AM
George Oriel: Collingwood has a way better list than Richmond and the dogs so the list is wrong from the get go

George Oriel: yes they do! Prove that they don’t. Why do you think Treloar chose the pies instead of Richmond? If the players know the facts and you don’t that speaks volumes about your ignorance

George Oriel:
no one cares about your team either but this is a list ranking post and I’m giving my opinion. If the truth hurts your precious feelings and if you’re too incompetent to handle basic facts, I suggest you leave this page immediately

George Oriel:
with degoey back in 2020 rance couldn’t hope to compete and will be embarrassed and humiliated like he was the last the time he played

George Oriel:  I’m not angry I’m just stating facts. You have no evidence to support your nonsensical claims and have thus made yourself look like an idiot. I’m laughing too but I also feel sorry for you. Alas ignorance is bliss I suppose, but for the sake of those around you, please get educated!

https://www.facebook.com/triplemfooty/posts/2510739468973311?comment_id=2510766042303987

:stupid
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on December 06, 2019, 03:28:54 AM
Quote from: @mattholding1989
Just watched the OC episode with The Killers in The Bait Shop and I hate the AFL and Richmond for ruining Mr Brightside so much

https://twitter.com/mattholding1989/status/1201836099670163456
:laugh:
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Owl on December 06, 2019, 06:35:39 PM
George Oriel: Collingwood has a way better list than Richmond and the dogs so the list is wrong from the get go

George Oriel: yes they do! Prove that they don’t. Why do you think Treloar chose the pies instead of Richmond? If the players know the facts and you don’t that speaks volumes about your ignorance

George Oriel:
no one cares about your team either but this is a list ranking post and I’m giving my opinion. If the truth hurts your precious feelings and if you’re too incompetent to handle basic facts, I suggest you leave this page immediately

George Oriel:
with degoey back in 2020 rance couldn’t hope to compete and will be embarrassed and humiliated like he was the last the time he played

George Oriel:  I’m not angry I’m just stating facts. You have no evidence to support your nonsensical claims and have thus made yourself look like an idiot. I’m laughing too but I also feel sorry for you. Alas ignorance is bliss I suppose, but for the sake of those around you, please get educated!

https://www.facebook.com/triplemfooty/posts/2510739468973311?comment_id=2510766042303987

:stupid

Well, there ya go, how can you counter that ersatz intellectual argument?
(https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F-jVv5_LCxQlI%2FUZf02HxwZkI%2FAAAAAAAAN_o%2FQ0K4R6r7fXg%2Fs1600%2Fcomicbookguy.jpg&f=1&nofb=1)
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on December 07, 2019, 04:16:22 AM
Quote from: Keefy
Look, here's the thing, the Tiges will not make the 8 next year. They had an arm chair ride from the umps. It was bordering on cheating.

https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl/more-news/champion-data-ranks-every-afl-clubs-list-for-2020-season-and-has-richmond-on-top/news-story/c514e480c7db10e5112b1feb6a714733
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on December 08, 2019, 04:09:41 AM
https://twitter.com/rickynixontoot/status/1202137733629526016
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on December 08, 2019, 04:14:56 AM
Western Australians are different people #vicbias
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EKlTqb-U8AAJDAQ?format=jpg&name=900x900)
https://twitter.com/moyza89/status/1200582774685483009
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on December 10, 2019, 01:30:00 PM
Quote from: ricky nixon
Quote from: @izzycollins__
Loveeeee Richmond supporters 😂🤦🏽
My favourite Fishing material on Twitter its just a boat load every day loving it

Quote from: ricky nixon
Not wrong mate and if you listen to the players they are on a mission a big mission they know that had Rich cooked in the prelim but injuries and players not avail cost them

Quote from: ricky nixon
The greatest team of all time fixture wise well done AFL

Quote from: ricky nixon
Should have been 3 but worked out being up for 23 rounds doesn't work

Quote from: ricky nixon
Seriously dreaming Geelong has you covered 30000000%

Quote from: ricky nixon
Agree flags in the bag .....i spoke with Cotch at a business lunch the other day such a ripper bloke i love him

Quote from: ricky nixon
Tigers were brilliant one thing i always recognise is the development of player you dont win a flag unless you bring in 3 or more young player to drive the ship they did brilliant coaching but Balmey the genius
https://twitter.com/rickynixontoot
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on December 10, 2019, 03:14:38 PM
He sounds like he's off his face all the time
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on December 10, 2019, 09:59:19 PM
Quote from: Barry
Scary Warning they say.

That’s what they said in 2018, one in a row only 😀

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/teams/richmond/tom-lynch-expects-his-partnership-with-jack-riewoldt-to-become-even-more-damaging-in-2020/news-story/031efe55d3e25601034ee4fb22697714


Quote from: @GcsunScast
I would not wish it on him, but it is fairly likely he does get injured again. PCL injuries are one of the toughest to return from. Lynch was overrated this year. His output got inflated as the team got better but they didn’t win the flag because of him. That’s not Richmond’s way

Quote from: @abestar777
Probably do his knee

Quote from: @tristancayzer
Probably blow his knee again
https://twitter.com/AFLcomau/status/1204264682321666048


Quote from: simon spargo
Wow... cricketers have left the MCG more times than the @RichmondTigers1 now! #vicbias

https://twitter.com/this_is_simon_s/status/1203432715762012165
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: cub on December 11, 2019, 08:07:59 AM
Healsville Races Nankervis got up in the first - Few of us Tigers were having a laugh and the salt flowed from fellow punters (Last one youse will win)
The salt is strong.....and drinking with a Pie man whose only salvation was we stopped the 3 peat we know it hurt lol,at the time maybe but at least you lost and we have another  :rollin
Prelimship  :lol
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on December 11, 2019, 12:53:34 PM
The AFL fixture is biased towards Victorian clubs

BrightOne
theRoar.com.au
10 December 2019


Every year we see the same headlines pop up.

People talk about which team has the best chance in the upcoming season and which players are rated elite and how the draw can favour one team due to the way they placed the previous year, given that each team plays each other once before the other games to make up the required 22 games per year are allocated.

But the unspoken, ignored injustice of a Victoria-centric landscape of the AFL goes unmentioned.

Maybe the fact that Melbourne had 18 games in Melbourne in 2019 could be ignored or the fact that Collingwood, Richmond, North Melbourne and the Western Bulldogs had 17 in their home city is just the way the draw works out.

Then I could be excused for mentioning that Geelong, Hawthorn, St Kilda, Essendon and Carlton all had 16 games in their home city.

But when you see that Adelaide, Brisbane, Freemantle, Gold Coast, Port Adelaide, West Coast, Greater Western Sydney and Sydney all had 12, that’s when the real injustice is seen.

Financially, the more your fans can attend games in your home city, the better. It’s not hard to see why clubs with 16 or more home-city games each season can attract supporters to every game.

Outside of the financial benefits, there is the travel logistics, the impact to player recovery, and costs to teams in terms of impaired preparation.

Think how easy it is each week for teams that can simply drive down the road to play. Then on the flip side, interstate teams need to travel, recover away from home, organise accommodation and be separated from their families and fans.

When drawing up the new season’s fixtures, the AFL does attempt to make the draw fairer by providing teams that finished in the bottom half of the ladder the previous season with fewer games against teams that finished in the top half of the ladder the previous year.

While this does serve as a way to alleviate the symptoms of a team struggling lower in the ladder, it does assume – with the absence of a crystal ball – that teams will perform similarly to the season before.

The issue of draw inequality for non-Victorian teams in regards to games in your home city is a challenging one for the AFL, but it starts by recognising firstly that the inequality is real and that the AFL is not simply a Victoria-centric game.

I understand that most Victorians simply do not care but accepting the problem may go a long way to understand why teams like Greater Western Sydney, Brisbane and the Gold Coast struggle to get a strong supporter base in their home state even when they are successful.

(https://cdn4.theroar.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Dustin-Martin-3-768x525.jpg)
Richmond took full advantage of their MCG home-ground advantage in 2019. (Photo by Mark Metcalfe/AFL Photos/via Getty Images )

https://www.theroar.com.au/2019/12/10/the-afl-fixture-is-biased-towards-victorian-clubs/
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on December 11, 2019, 01:50:39 PM
So the solution is that the Victorian teams play their games in other states???

For someone titled "Bright one" the author has not thought this through
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on December 11, 2019, 04:02:09 PM
Im quite happy for Norf and St Kilda to relocate out of Victoria.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: JP Tiger on December 11, 2019, 04:49:44 PM
OK then, but we want Fitzroy & Sth Melbourne back & we will then quite happily go back to being the VFL!  WC, Freo, Adelaide, Port, GWS & GC can all start their own competition & survive without all the AFL hand outs & TV rights then! 
Goodbye whingers ... & good luck with that! 
You wanted to join so we let you ... but we could also change our minds too!     :thumbsdown     
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Owl on December 11, 2019, 09:19:46 PM
Lets just secede and we can have a truly international sport.  Plus we get rid of Queensland, the IQ of the joint will stuffing soar.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on December 12, 2019, 03:58:45 AM
Quote from: Grant @grant_finlayson
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Is an absolute hack he [Cotchin] wouldn’t get a game at sides with good midfields like west coast, Giants and Dogs etc. He has had one good year in his career.

He will never be a Brownlow medallist Watson is the worthy winner. Like I said one good year in his career that’s why he got AA. Plenty of spuds play in premierships and there quite a few premiership captains over the years are spuds Cotchin and Maxwell come to mind.

Won’t get any more Richmond’s two premiership era is over but a very good era it was.

He might be a good leader but he is a very average footballer wouldn’t get a game at the dogs.

https://twitter.com/grant_finlayson/status/1204532424761212928

--------------------------------------------------------

(http://oneeyed-richmond.com/images/other/Eaglefansook.jpg)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9l9HMoQwuOs

:facepalm :stupid
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on December 12, 2019, 04:13:02 PM
Stupidity and Narcotics must be in big supply at the moment. These bludgers will lose their minds when Cotch lifts the 2020 premiership cup at at 5.30pm on tne last Saturday  in September next year.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on December 13, 2019, 03:13:53 AM
Quote from: WCE
Hawthorn, c/wood and Richmond are favored by there mates at HQ every year by giving them 7 or 8 home games in a row when every other team has to stuff about. There supporters dont give a toss about the other teams as long as there looked after thats all that matters. A huge example is this : West Coast won the 2018 GF, yet our first game this year was the longest trip in football to Brisbane. Tell me when ever has either of the 3 teams mentioned ever had to travel like that after winning a GF ?? NEVER. At the start of the 2018 season Hawthorn left Melbourne once in the first 8 rounds , this year Richmond got gifted 7 home games in a row at the end of the season WHY ???
Imagine the cry’s and whimpering if the Eagles or Dockers got 8 games in a row at home , the tears would be worse than Noah’s flood. but its ok for the 3 teams though isn’t it – Narcissism at the highest level, bias and totally unfair. You can’t deny it, unfortunately it’s real and factual.

From the comments section of https://www.theroar.com.au/2019/12/10/the-afl-fixture-is-biased-towards-victorian-clubs/
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on December 13, 2019, 11:26:01 AM
Again these nuffers do not think through the ramifications of their saltiness.

So lets give West Coast games in a row at Optus Stadium.

Then watch the whinging when the Perth based Eagles supporters have to go two months without being able to watch their team in Perth. Not to mention the wear and tear on their players travelling each weekend for two months
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on December 15, 2019, 04:59:13 PM
Quote from: Rd10.1998_11.1#36
Or, a golden run with injury (ha!) like Richmond had. A freak year where everything goes right for no particular reason (that's called luck).

PS. I couldn't give a rats how many members Richmond have and frankly if you do, you've been sucked in by the AFL/RFC publicity. There's a reason they don't separate their membership revenue from their merchandise sales in their annual report and that's because they don't want it to be obvious how many limited-access and Auskick memberships they sell. They also sought to increase membership by moving their training ground first to Craigieburn and the Cardinia - that's what a struggling club does, it's not something to be used as a blueprint by strong clubs. There's nothing wrong with Collingwood's membership numbers, we're still the biggest drawing club in the league on match day.

Quote from: Rd10.1998_11.1#36
That's why I don't care how many members Richmond has - we're still #1 for BUMS ON SEATS despite them having 17k more members than us. That's why I said you got sucked in by the headline and your response didn't do anything to change my perception of that.

http://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/viewtopic.php?t=86842
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on December 17, 2019, 01:22:25 AM
Quote from: Col from Freo
You're kidding, right? Richmond premiership is surely tainted because of massive home ground advantage.

Quote from: Dicky Forte
No one battered an eyelid when they were losing for 37 years, same friggen ground mate

Quote from: AFHell - A bankrupt VFL in disguise
Because 7 straight games at the mcg leading into finals is not an advantage when you finish 14th.

https://twitter.com/AF_Hell/status/1202409813461749760
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: lamington on December 17, 2019, 11:27:37 AM
These posts are hilarious and make me happy
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on December 17, 2019, 03:41:16 PM
Quote from: @AFL
The best player from 2010-2019 was ____________.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EL4hAExVUAA0Thu?format=jpg&name=360x360)

Quote from: @matthew_macrow
Now show his 6 years of mediocrity, I'm sure there's some footage

Quote from: @matthew_macrow
You want points for beating 2 of the worst grand final teams in history? Please. Try knocking off hawthorn or geelong at their peak and get back to me

Quote from: @matthew_macrow
Far as this entire decade goes dusty aint even the best RICHMOND player let alone anyone else
https://twitter.com/matthew_macrow/status/1206517543889817600
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on December 19, 2019, 02:14:57 AM
A quarter-by-quarter live at the ground view of the Prelim from a Cats fan:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDroNCycZqg
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on December 19, 2019, 01:14:01 PM
Rance's retirement didn't stop the sookies calling up on SEN  :thumbsdown:

Collingwood fan - "It's sad we'll be robbed next year from seeing De Goey destroy Rance again like last time they played on each other."

Eagles fan - "Sad to see the second-best defender in the game retire."
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on December 19, 2019, 04:19:20 PM
Quote from: IAP
I’m sure he’ll dive straight into what he wants to do after footy. He won’t be flopping about feeling sorry for himself.

https://www.theroar.com.au/2019/12/19/breaking-alex-rance-announces-immediate-retirement/
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on December 21, 2019, 04:05:37 AM
Most sensitive AFL supporters award

Kane Cornes
SEN
20 December 2019


Richmond

It was a really tough field for this award, but Richmond fans are the winners. Not only are they the most sensitive, they also have the shortest memory. Whenever something is said about the precious Tigers, such as, “they had the biggest fixture free-kick in the history of the game this year” the text machine lights up with abuse.

You can’t even look sideways at coach Damien Hardwick or any of the players for that matter, even though it was only three years ago that 85% of you Tigers fans wanted the coach and captain gone. It was a really tight race, but the Richmond faithful are very deserving of this award.

https://www.sen.com.au/news/2019/12/19/kane-cornes-sporting-awards-for-2019/
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: cub on December 21, 2019, 09:27:07 AM
The guy is a goose but a cleverish one, pretty simple to bait the biggest and most passionate supporter base to get all the hits he needs and therefore boost his career.
Would love to see the Tiger army just completly ignore him and watch his career go down the drain.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on December 23, 2019, 02:20:30 AM
The Cats have already started sooking again.

-----------------------------------

Geelong are gathering evidence to back up their argument to play more than nine home games at GMHBA Stadium in the future.

The Cats have requested to play 11 home games at GMHBA Stadium in the past two years but are happy with the current situation that sees them play nine home games in Geelong and two big-drawing home games at the MCG.

Cook questioned whether the AFL applied the best fit policy in a consistent manner.

"We thought that would be a compromise, and they refused to accept this recommendation and stuck to their 'best fit' policy. I’m not so sure if the 'best fit' policy is a national one – if the 'best fit' policy is the same in NSW when GWS play, or in Brisbane? So we’ve got a fair amount of work to go in that area," Cook said.

The Giants have played all their home finals at Spotless Stadium while Sydney plays all their home finals at the SCG, while the Cats have only played one home final at GMHBA Stadium, playing Richmond in the 2018 qualifying final and Collingwood in the 2019 qualifying final at the MCG despite finishing above them. They lost both games.

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/what-s-best-fit-cats-mount-case-for-more-home-games-20191221-p53m2y.html
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on December 23, 2019, 02:51:52 AM
A totally unhinged Norf supporter and his giant anti-Richmond conspiracy theory  ::).

Quote
Short version:

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/best-football-related-rumour-you-have-heard-from-someone-you-trust.1208031/post-63940763
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: lamington on December 23, 2019, 05:18:48 AM
That was an absolutely hilarious read
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on December 23, 2019, 08:03:29 AM
A totally unhinged Norf supporter and his giant anti-Richmond conspiracy theory  ::).

Quote
Short version:

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/best-football-related-rumour-you-have-heard-from-someone-you-trust.1208031/post-63940763

Ive read some weired poo over the years and Im against clubs taking legal action for poo written on forums but I must say if I was at Richmond this morning reading that shir I would be calling the club lawyers and launching defamation proceedings against this poster. This posters slanders goes against everyone one of our coaches, players and administrators. It is slander of the highest order and for the first time ever i actually think our club needs to
Protect itself its players coaches and administrators from this buffoon and his lying slanderous defamations. He needs to be held to account for what his written on the forums.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Owl on December 23, 2019, 06:20:44 PM
lol what a desperate wanker
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Eat_em_Alive on December 24, 2019, 06:15:09 AM
From time to time we've all had a laugh and a joke about various teams sometimes our own  :shh but what I read in that link is certainly defamation worthy. And I hope it's brought to the club's attention asap..
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Francois Jackson on December 24, 2019, 07:28:52 AM
From time to time we've all had a laugh and a joke about various teams sometimes our own  :shh but what I read in that link is certainly defamation worthy. And I hope it's brought to the club's attention asap..

maybe the same person who felt they had to dob in Y&B can report the link. Bet it doesnt happen though :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Eat_em_Alive on December 24, 2019, 08:19:35 AM
From time to time we've all had a laugh and a joke about various teams sometimes our own  :shh but what I read in that link is certainly defamation worthy. And I hope it's brought to the club's attention asap..

maybe the same person who felt they had to dob in Y&B can report the link. Bet it doesnt happen though :shh

I missed that one. Disappointing if there are rats on this board.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on December 26, 2019, 04:30:38 PM
It wasn't an OERite. Someone else ratted. Remember anyone can read the forum not just OER members/posters like us.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Eat_em_Alive on December 30, 2019, 11:58:34 PM
Ok fair enough
Should make it members read only
Would solve alot of problems  :shh maybe
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on December 31, 2019, 10:42:23 AM
Thats actually a good idea.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on January 03, 2020, 05:08:01 PM
@matthew_macrow Dec 27, 2019

How the hell did they draft a champion team? Tambling over buddy, lennon over cripps. Crazy stuff

-----------------------------------------------------------

@JakobWasTaken
Every single Richmond fan likes him [Rance], so that's a 100,000+ people.

@morgs640
30000 people and 70000 pet memberships

@JakobWasTaken
Your ignorance is really stuffing funny.

@morgs640
Hahaha I'm the ignorant one when everyone except tigers fans realises he's not that good.

@JakobWasTaken
Please explain to me how he is not that good?

@morgs640
Find a non Richmond fan, ask them their opinion. Case solved

@andreamaryb
Wayne Carey, Leigh Matthews, David king for three all think he’s brilliant. Last time I checked none of them barracked for Richmond.

https://twitter.com/AFL/status/1207911005625303040
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on January 03, 2020, 05:08:45 PM
Something for these opposition sooks to ponder about  ;D.

Years since last premiership

RICHMOND – 1 year
WEST COAST – 2 years
W.BULLDOGS – 4 years
HAWTHORN – 5 years
SYDNEY SWANS – 8 years
GWS GIANTS – 8 years in the league & without a flag
GEELONG – 9 years
GOLD COAST – 9 years in the league & without a flag
COLLINGWOOD – 10 years
PORT ADELAIDE – 16 years
BRISBANE – 17 years
ESSENDON – 20 years
NORTH MELB. – 21 years
ADELAIDE – 22 years
CARLTON – 25 years
FREMANTLE – 25 years in the league & without a flag
ST KILDA – 54 years
MELBOURNE – 56 years

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/teams/demons-and-saints-fans-hoping-to-follow-in-footsteps-of-tigers-and-bulldogs/news-story/82fb3f9e2e35282a042f26fc167450e3
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Eat_em_Alive on January 03, 2020, 10:35:20 PM
Deelightful  :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: cub on January 04, 2020, 08:27:46 AM
25 years blooz loooove it, long may it continue
And on the sooking, it has turned into one massive collective sook it's great
One more Tigers and the world may just collapse in on itself  :cheers
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on January 06, 2020, 01:34:56 AM
Quote from: Mark Alvey @alvey5
Cotchin would have found it hard if he was suspended for the 17 GF like he should have been, absolute Rort

Quote from: Rhubarb90386160
Send Cotchin to the Suns and see how good a leader he is then 😂

Quote from: Mitchell Kermath @mitchykerm
Easy for Cotchin when they gave him a Brownlow he didn’t deserve and then let him play in a grand final he should’ve been suspended for
https://twitter.com/rickynixontoot/status/1213003799696048128
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on January 09, 2020, 03:34:29 AM
From the Herald-Sun's readers comments:

(https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/attachments/e7245e38-339b-4fbc-be09-9da81ff9c0a2-jpeg.803163/)
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on January 09, 2020, 11:38:42 AM
From the Herald-Sun's readers comments:

(https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/attachments/e7245e38-339b-4fbc-be09-9da81ff9c0a2-jpeg.803163/)

No, and at the moment we have the right to be arrogant! Winning a flag entitles you to that until the following season :)
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on January 13, 2020, 05:03:12 PM
North Melbourne's Shaun Atley ... said he found it difficult to watch finals football from his couch at home, admitting to feelings of envy watching Richmond players hold up the premiership cup last September.

He said some of his teammates avoided the television set at finals time altogether.

“You definitely get jealous,” he said.

“It can be hard to watch for sure.

“Some of the boys don’t even watch it because they don’t want to get that feeling, but we understand and we know it can turn really quickly.

“But at the same time there’s a lot of work that needs to go in behind that to get to that stage.”

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/teams/north-melbourne/north-melbourne-defender-shaun-atley-says-he-is-hungry-for-a-return-to-september-action-in-2020/news-story/0932d9d61afadbe66d2fce1ce6acae8f
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on January 15, 2020, 08:50:17 AM
What a surprise

NORF

lol
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on January 17, 2020, 02:59:34 AM
Blight on SEN with Dwayne Russell said footy now is too defensive (wingmen pushed back at centre bounces to bolster the defence and tackling momentum to keep the ball in the forward line is causing more stoppages). A coach one day will go all out attack and change things.

ps. Having said that Blight likes Dimma as what Dimma says has always made sense to Blight.

https://player.whooshkaa.com/episode?id=549753
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on January 17, 2020, 10:17:45 AM
Our game is based on defense first but once we have the ball it is get the ball as quickly forward by any means.

Would think our game would stand up against anyone trying all out attack. They would be caught out on rebound.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on January 22, 2020, 04:00:43 PM
Eddie McGuire responds to claims Collingwood might not be the biggest club in the AFL.

https://www.triplem.com.au/story/eddie-mcguire-responds-to-claims-collingwood-might-not-be-the-biggest-club-in-the-afl-154281
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on January 22, 2020, 04:17:37 PM
Ed sounds as though he is ready to concede.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: RedanTiger on January 22, 2020, 04:51:23 PM
Poor old Ed.
Really sounds like a politician - setting up false arguments (straw man) that no-one has suggested just so they look silly.
Biggest club from Marvel, Biggest in Western suburbs, most revenue from pokies.

How about highest membership in the whole AFL
How about highest attendance in the AFL
How about highest ratings on AFL telecasts

Thats not a limitation based on venue, home  or non-core revenue.
Thats the best in the WHOLE competition we compete within.

Suck it up Ed.   oh and best of luck with your salary cap and upgrade subsidies.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on January 26, 2020, 04:12:03 PM
Quote from: 00VicWard001
Quote from: Down at K Park
    Arrogance is saying on live tv, maybe dangerfield should have stayed and he'd be a premiership player. One week before the grand final where they were utterly humiliated. I wonder who did that?

    If that's not arrogance then I don't know what is.
You know what, he was right. That's not arrogance. If Danger stayed, the Crows would have beaten Richmond in the 2017 GF. That year, Danger was the dominant brownlow medalist. He was a beast. Add him into that Crows team and they wouldn't have wilted.

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/is-josh-jenkins-in-our-best-22.1231369/page-13#post-64111213

 :lol

Funny that given Dusty was the 2017 Brownlow medallist and Danger didn't stop us beating Geelong in the finals of both 2017 & 2019 on our way to premierships :stupid.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on January 29, 2020, 02:34:37 PM
More Geelong bias. Dwayne Russell on SEN this arvo claimed Dangerfield was the best player in the AFL and clearly by far the first player to be picked to play for Victoria. He also said Dangerfield was ahead of Buddy and Fyfe was close to him. No mention of Dusty  :lol.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 03, 2020, 03:21:55 AM
Quote from: Finding_Nino
Played Crows and GWS in Grand Finals two interstate sides who struggle at the G. different story if they versed a big Victorian club where the MCG doesn’t become so much of a home ground advantage imo.

Quote from: bltn
Are we really living in a world whereby the Tigers are winning the Flag 3 years out of 4…f*** me ?

Time to find another passion !

Source: Bomberblitz forum (https://discourse.bomberblitz.com/t/season-2020-richmond/17528/15).
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 03, 2020, 03:35:45 AM
Replying to @7NewsMelbourne: (https://twitter.com/7NewsMelbourne/status/1223878799651000320)

Quote from: Bangers @bangr75
Good,so when Weiters give you [Lynch] another bath (bar the cheap frees you’ll get) then there’s no excuse

Quote from: Greg Roberts @TazDevil66
Honestly getting beyond a joke with channel 7 continuing to give so much airtime to bed about theirs and the AFL's lovechild Richmond. How about you remember there are actually 17 other teams.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 07, 2020, 10:32:38 PM
From #AFLWTigersBlues twitter:

Quote from: Robbo @Luckdragon07
Is it just me or is it good seeing Richmond lose?? Men or Women’s team I don’t care, I don’t have to hear @Richmond_FC supporters gloating 🤙

Quote from: @MattThomas1405
The natural order, where Carlton torpedo Richmond dreams in the 1st round, has been restored..

Quote from: @marc_leroy
Now THAT’S the tigers of old #AFLW #aflwtigersblues

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 13, 2020, 03:01:41 AM
Quote from: Rhys
Bec Goddard is 100% right. Why are the defending premiere playing away round 1? Why weren’t they given the chance to unfurl a premiership flag at home first up?

No, we HAD to have Richmond and Carlton playing first up again. #VicBias alive and well as always.

https://twitter.com/senzu_bean/status/1226040596797612032

Quote from: Pam Hosking
Sick and tired of Richmond Bering the face of AFL football. Maybe we could include other teams. There are 18 teams in this competition. Best draw most games at home ground   Give is a rest ⁉️ ⁉️ ⁉️

https://twitter.com/pamhosking2/status/1227127857895206912
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 15, 2020, 05:53:54 AM
AFL twitter: Tell us, what do you love most about footy? ❤️

Quote from: @nicopoulos_john
AFL prejudices the fixture to favour teams like Richmond

Quote from: @AlanHutchins13
That the tigers play 98% of their games at the MCG

Quote from: @grant_phelps
The Victorian centric nature of the "fixture".   Cant get enough of it.
https://twitter.com/AFL/status/1228179321170223104

----------------------------------------------------------

Quote from: @GcsunScast
Marlion Pickett is the most over-hyped player in the AFLM. He clearly has some good moves and proved that he is AFL standard, but I have strong doubts that he even plays a lot of senior footy. Injury prone as well, so he will do well to get through preseason.

https://twitter.com/GcsunScast/status/1227860406460305410

---------------------------------------------------------

Quote from: FlowersByIrene
The Tigers' model will pass and it will be a glorious day when it does. Talentless runners pushing, fumbling and knocking the ball forward for meterage and then tackling ravenously will eventually be overcome by an actually talented team who can maintain possession whilst cutting through a zone.

Needs to be a balnce of defensive tacklign and clean ball movement. That's perfect footy. Richmond is everything wrong with footy right now.

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/have-the-tigers-rendered-stats-useless.1235895/page-3#post-64343180
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: cub on February 15, 2020, 08:46:04 PM
Please win again, this is stuffing awesome  :rollin
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 16, 2020, 05:24:16 AM
Quote from: 90 nice
put your hand up if you are sick of their arrogance

Blues bet the tigers in the aflw last night great to see the arrogant tigers go down too

https://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/viewtopic.php?t=86974

Quote from: Piesnchess
Quote from: 90 nice
Nup Richmond have won this year’s premiership already   
Doubt it, they were poo lucky with injuries again last year, all their stars aside from Rance came back, right on cue, they have a lot of luck with injuries long term the tigers, but that cant last. it has to end. Plus they ran into a very lack lustre GWS way outa their depth,buggered after playing one hell of a tough PF against us, plus, we were injury riddled ourselves, the tigers would have been very wary meeting us fully fit with their nemesis Mason Cox out too. Their luck will run out this season, I would bloody well hope so, cant stand the arrogant bastards, like all of us.  ::) >:(

https://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/viewtopic.php?p=1951315#1951315
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on February 16, 2020, 01:23:48 PM
Why do these losers from the carringbush carry on. Theyre chokers. They coughed up a flag against West
Coast. Anyway we will see. Personally I see us going back to back.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 17, 2020, 02:51:45 AM
Quote from: gosaintas
It's not electric. It's a bunch of try hard unco's fumbling the ball forward until one of them manages to finally pick the thing up and have a ping. It's not far off unwatchable. Wet weather football in the dry. Perfectly coached to suit the poor skill level. Club has "peaked" at a time when the competition is also weak.

Quote from: gosaintas
Our game plan stood up in finals, we just were outplayed by two excellent teams in the gf's. There are no top teams at the moment. Beating average interstate sides on your home deck in your gf's is one hell of an advantage. Playing two hot teams like 09 Geel and 10 Coll is a different proposition. All 3 sides would flog the Richmond team of today.

Quote from: gosaintas
The Geelong side of today would get smashed by the 09 version of Geelong, just like Richmond would.

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/have-the-tigers-rendered-stats-useless.1235895/page-5#post-64352250

Quote from: roz1812
We were all over them in the prelim final up until half time until our coach lost us the game. Plus we didn't even have Mitch Duncan or Hawkins. They are certainly beatable. I think one of these keys is slowing the game down, they love a fast paced and high intensity game and live off perceived pressure. They are very counter attacking team, so forward half turnovers are fatal when playing them, got to get the ball deep inside 50 and ideally take marks . I think keeping the ball off the ground is a must against them because they play that forward at all cost style and stream forward in waves so they love the ball on the ground and if you are marking it they cant use their pressure game. I think a game style similar to the hawks in their 3 peat years would be very effective against them. Also got to convert inside 50s and shots on goal, while this is relevant against any team, its more so for Richmond as they don't need many inside 50's to hurt teams.

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/stopping-the-tigers-2020.1233643/post-64364566
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on February 17, 2020, 10:18:17 AM
Quote from: roz1812
We were all over them in the prelim final up until half time until our coach lost us the game. Plus we didn't even have Mitch Duncan or Hawkins. They are certainly beatable. I think one of these keys is slowing the game down, they love a fast paced and high intensity game and live off perceived pressure. They are very counter attacking team, so forward half turnovers are fatal when playing them, got to get the ball deep inside 50 and ideally take marks . I think keeping the ball off the ground is a must against them because they play that forward at all cost style and stream forward in waves so they love the ball on the ground and if you are marking it they cant use their pressure game. I think a game style similar to the hawks in their 3 peat years would be very effective against them. Also got to convert inside 50s and shots on goal, while this is relevant against any team, its more so for Richmond as they don't need many inside 50's to hurt teams.

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/stopping-the-tigers-2020.1233643/post-64364566

Not too far from the truth this, although I would like to add that Geelong is old and slow, so I think Richmond out-ran them in addition to their couch being an actual potato.

Richmond 100% struggles when they play clean teams that maintain possession and move the ball quickly. This is how we lost to Collingwood in the 2018 PF.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on February 17, 2020, 02:03:15 PM
So team's can beat is with Hawthorn's game plan from their premiership years...when we beat them two out three times with an inferior side.... three out of four when you count 2012 when they were runners-up... :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on February 17, 2020, 04:24:19 PM
Quote from: roz1812
We were all over them in the prelim final up until half time until our coach lost us the game. Plus we didn't even have Mitch Duncan or Hawkins. They are certainly beatable. I think one of these keys is slowing the game down, they love a fast paced and high intensity game and live off perceived pressure. They are very counter attacking team, so forward half turnovers are fatal when playing them, got to get the ball deep inside 50 and ideally take marks . I think keeping the ball off the ground is a must against them because they play that forward at all cost style and stream forward in waves so they love the ball on the ground and if you are marking it they cant use their pressure game. I think a game style similar to the hawks in their 3 peat years would be very effective against them. Also got to convert inside 50s and shots on goal, while this is relevant against any team, its more so for Richmond as they don't need many inside 50's to hurt teams.

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/stopping-the-tigers-2020.1233643/post-64364566

Not too far from the truth this, although I would like to add that Geelong is old and slow, so I think Richmond out-ran them in addition to their couch being an actual potato.

Richmond 100% struggles when they play clean teams that maintain possession and move the ball quickly. This is how we lost to Collingwood in the 2018 PF.

The thing we do well is to keep our play up for all 4 quarters. Few teams have been able to go with us and are not consistent enough to ultimately challenge us.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tiger Khosh on February 17, 2020, 06:20:01 PM
We didn’t lose to Collingwood in the prelim because they played clean and maintained possession. We lost because barring a few players the rest never came out to play.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: wayne on February 17, 2020, 06:25:55 PM
Quote
Unpopular opinion
Man for man @essendonfc have better players than @Richmond_FC .

Most of tigers players are role players and wouldn’t get into a lot of top 8 sides.

Dimma is a great coach and has done a great job in tricking people into believing duds like Prestia are elite.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 19, 2020, 03:47:39 PM
Quote from: @JusticeForJobe
Unpopular opinion

Man for man @essendonfc have better players than @Richmond_FC .

Most of tigers players are role players and wouldn’t get into a lot of top 8 sides.

Dimma is a great coach and has done a great job in tricking people into believing duds like Prestia are elite.
That Bombers fan couldn't even be original. He copied that tweet from a Man Utd fan  :wallywink

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EQ90xRcUYAAUmKQ?format=jpg&name=small)



Quote from: @alexmatthewsar
Huge call mate, but true. As a fellow Essendon supporter, I'd have our players over Richmond players anyday of the week, regardless how many Premierships they've won.
https://twitter.com/JusticeForJobe/status/1229269193977036800

:stupid
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 19, 2020, 03:58:13 PM
Quote from: @jamesvear
Someone needs to go through the ledger at Richmond. I think some auditing could reveal some salary cap breaches...

https://twitter.com/jamesvear/status/1229548498963427328

(https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/attachments/1582051744352-png.825178/)
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on February 19, 2020, 04:38:39 PM
Insanity should be a growing concern for governments in Australia.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 20, 2020, 02:01:45 PM
Dwayne Russell on SEN this arvo spent nearly the whole first hour of his show still talking/whinging about Geelong not playing home finals at Kardinia Park and that Geelong were missing Hawkins & Duncan in the Prelim.

'Geelong played Richmond down in round 21 at Kardinia Park in the Tigers premiership year and won'.


'The AFL aren't going to change it so there's no point going on about it and whinging about it ... but Geelong playing in front of 75k Tiger fans at the MCG is an away game.'

 :lol



Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on February 20, 2020, 02:48:38 PM
Think I know that "Metal Militia" mouth breather ..if it's who I think it is, he's an absolute halfwit....clueless flog of the highest order...stands to reason he'd have a twitter account... :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 20, 2020, 03:51:03 PM
Quote from: Fox Footy
Opposition clubs, beware.

Promising intra-club efforts from its youngs guns prove @Richmond_FC, scarily, should get better, writes @tommorris32

Quote from: Ben Alexander @BennyA83
Right...playing against their own teammates in “match simulation” makes them scary. Sure thing 🙄
https://twitter.com/FOXFOOTY/status/1230314786711195648
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 21, 2020, 03:48:41 AM
Quote from: Tony Gullaci @TGullaci
Lucky to win 2 flags. Played 2 very disappointing interstate teams. Lucky.

https://twitter.com/TGullaci/status/1230340086153146369
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on February 21, 2020, 08:45:24 AM
Quote from: Tony Gullaci @TGullaci
Lucky to win 2 flags. Played 2 very disappointing interstate teams. Lucky.

https://twitter.com/TGullaci/status/1230340086153146369

Sta arxidia mou Tony boy with your kolo opinions
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 21, 2020, 04:24:59 PM
Quote from: @Melcatzzzz
Quote from: alvey5
Got a lesson from Dusty? What planet are you on? Danger was in the best 2 players on the ground at half time he had given Dusty a bath on ball it’s why the Richmond hierarchy made the change at half time to get Dusty forward cause he was getting carved.
We all know that but this is a new bandwagoners RFC fan here - they have no logic.... Danger even played sore. He certainly wasn’t the reason we lost that night. Put Toma and Mitch back in the side and the result would’ve been different....

Quote from: @Melcatzzzz
Well Bacher got away with his forearm. Some rules for some and different rules for others I guess....

Quote from: @Melcatzzzz
GWS were shot with injuries, illness anyone would’ve beaten them especially if they were playing on their home ground they barely ever leave....
https://twitter.com/Melcatzzzz/status/1229704996356100097
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 21, 2020, 04:29:04 PM
Quote from: Ricky Nixon
.if you don't like fact like the rubbish fixture and games at the G including finals that should have been outside Melb then go take a long walk of a short pier
Quote from: George Hartley @gthartley
Don't forget the review panel letting Cotchin play that first GF (2017?) when he should have been rubbed out
Quote from: @frammopton
Totally agree Ricky. This is b.s. and the same again this year. It will never be an even comp as long as this crap fixturing continues. No-one should have the MCG as their home ground.

The difference is GF's aren't played at those grounds. Some teams don't even get a look at the G and even if they do it's only once or twice a season.
https://twitter.com/rickynixontoot/status/1230307114473553920
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: wayne on February 21, 2020, 06:09:12 PM
Where did we play Brisbane again?
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 22, 2020, 02:46:54 PM
Quote from: @pies_forever
Dusty must be the only player in the AFL seems he’s on the front of everything
Quote from: @shirleykone
i used to work at bonds and i had to stare at him all day

Quote from: @pies_forever
Why do Richmond fans now think that all of their players are better than every other player in the comp? Like shut ya mouth you nuffs.

Quote from: @pies_forever
Sorry, apparently captains haven’t been announced yet. But they are saying Dusty is the “front runner” for vics. Um no, he’s no leader. If theres anyone who should be, it’s Pendles
Quote from: @Jen2310
lol dusty is no captain. He wouldn't even get captain of his own club.
Quote from: @pies_forever
Yep. Wouldn’t surprise me though, he’s on the front of everything because he’s a fan favourite. If it’s not Pendles, I’ll be fuming

https://twitter.com/pies_forever
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 22, 2020, 02:53:19 PM
Quote from: EuroDez
Fyfe and Pickett are the only ones that can be influenced by opinion not purely results on the field.
The circle jerk some media have over Pickett doing a 360 turn when his team was up by sixty is unbearable
Quote from: @GeraldLynch_
hahaha 100% agree, and he didn’t even really need to do it to get through, hope he gets a big reality check round 1
https://twitter.com/djx1984/status/1230744689155817472
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 25, 2020, 12:27:01 AM
Quote from: IAP
Richmond have basically copied the Hawthorn formula of drafting a good core, letting it mature and then filling the gaps with ready-made players from other clubs. The single most important ingredient for a “dynasty” is desire; can the players sustain the mental level required to stay at the top? It wouldn’t surprise me if Richmond falter this year, especially if they get a couple of injuries. They’ve had a charmed run over the last couple of years, and a nonexistent opponent in the grand final last year. West Coast in particular will be keen to atone this year, and they’ll be hot on their heels.

Quote from: Paul D
Richmond so far following in the Hawks footsteps in the sense that they keep dispatching interstate opponents in the grand final with ease. Be nice to see them challenged by someone while they’re at the top of their game. Eagles and Pies the only two teams who could do that this year I think

Quote from: spruce moose
This is Richmond’s last year at the top.

You get 4 good years, and if you are super lucky, a 5th.

Essendon had 3 in 1999-2001, Brisbane had 4 ( and by the 4th they were clearly 2nd fiddle to port Adelaide), Geelong had 4 years with a lucky 5th in 2011 (The 2011 team was not dominant), hawthorn had 4 And took 3 flags as a reward.

Richmond should easily have been three-peaters as well.

This is their last year.
https://www.theroar.com.au/2020/02/24/on-the-verge-of-an-unlikely-dynasty/
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 25, 2020, 12:28:33 AM
5. Richmond a powerhouse?
For decades we enjoyed the shenanigans over at Punt Road. A rotating door of coaches, botched draft picks, manure dumped on their doorstep et cetera. Ah, the good old days. And now Richmond has won two flags in three years as well as powered away in terms of membership figures. As a lifelong Collingwood supporter, this also traumatises me. What we have to truly understand here is the psyche of the Richmond Football Club is about angst, self-loathing and self-detonation. This success thingy in the modern era is an anathema. Let’s disallow these two flags and nature will do the rest. Their flags should be awarded to their opponents – to Adelaide in 2017 and, since GWS is out of the competition, to GWS’s last opponent in 2019, Collingwood.
https://www.theroar.com.au/2020/02/24/a-brilliant-new-direction-for-the-afl/
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 25, 2020, 01:29:30 PM
Quote from: @Melcatzzzz
Quote from: @Mattys123
That Marley Williams suspension is about right. Choose to bump. Send a player to hospital. Get suspended #AFL #MRP
Unless you’re Cotchin....
https://twitter.com/Melcatzzzz/status/1231825562311618560
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 29, 2020, 05:23:50 PM
In response to the photo of six Tigers in their state of origin jumpers.

https://twitter.com/AFL/status/1233355938083438594

Quote from: @Melcatzzzz
Cos it’s all about them. Vomit Face vomiting

Quote from: Afil-san
Really hate them because they are just that good likewise Geelong 2007-2011 and hawks 2012-2015. Cheers for grat comp next year

Quote from: @danblencowe
Sad

Quote from: @DaicosMagic
Booooo

Quote from: @jimmykayy13
Richmond: the afl love child

Quote from: @akc1973

Face vomiting
Face vomiting
Face vomiting
Face vomiting
Face vomiting
Face vomiting
Face vomiting
Face vomiting
Face vomiting
Face vomiting
Face vomiting
Face vomiting
Face vomiting
Face vomiting
Face vomiting
Face vomiting
Face vomiting
Face vomiting
Face vomiting
Face vomiting
Face vomiting
Face vomiting
Face vomiting
Face vomiting
Face vomiting
Face vomiting
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 01, 2020, 06:29:50 AM
Quote from: thylacine60
I am puking over this punt road infiltration of the game - the latest afl television promotion, the captain & coach tonight, the medal winner, this rubbish chemist ad full of their aflw team - it just has to stop.......we have to stop it...........we will stop it...........
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/bushfire-relief-state-of-origin-match.1236675/post-64478244

Quote from: Cats_09
And of course Dusty wins it
Quote from: winty
Great speech Dusty....not

He only stood out as he was on the end of all the hard work of his teammates further up the ground.
Quote from: Cats_09
Literally stood out and away from other players

I'm curious - is there some predetermined outcome that when Dusty plays in matches that have a BOG award for that match, that he must win it?
Quote from: BlakeyNoFlakey
There's no way Dusty was the best player tonight. What a crock of poo.

Danger was fantastic out there, he did all the grunt work that led to many goals. Papley with 5 goals probably deserved BOG too. The Bont or Pendles was even better than Dusty,
Quote from: Cats_09
Seems to be easy option now days - vote for Dusty as he probably did something good...
Quote from: winty
Probably because all the single cell amoebas which make up the Richmond supporter base voted for him.
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/non-geelong-football-afl-discussion-2020.1228586/page-63
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Damo on March 01, 2020, 11:25:06 AM
Dusty shouldn’t have won it
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on March 01, 2020, 04:01:50 PM
(https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/attachments/ea4f8b7a-f5fa-43ae-96ba-ea717981f8e5-jpeg.831191/)

 :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on March 01, 2020, 04:11:15 PM
Dusty shouldn’t have won it
Most disposals, 2 goals, gave 4-5 off and had 12 score involvements.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 02, 2020, 03:35:39 PM
Quote from: @LFC__George
Richmond are dusted. Premiership hangover incoming. They won’t make the 8 and will lose to carlton rd 1 #MarshSeries

https://twitter.com/LFC__George/status/1234035191179431936

Quote from: @AliciaCafferkey
It's good to watch Richmond lose even in the pre season. #AFL #AFLMarshSeries

https://twitter.com/AliciaCafferkey/status/1234025851567525889

Quote from: @JamieRadford66
Shouldn't that read 'An understrength Collingwood was far too good for an understrength Richmond'? The AFL media's love affair with Richmond is really getting tiresome  ::)

@CollingwoodFC #AFL #MarshSeries

https://twitter.com/JamieRadford66/status/1234246096035041282

Quote from: @Melcatzzzz
Replying to @abcgrandstand @AustralianStory and  @Richmond_FC

All of Australia. C’mon the whole story’s a beef up!!

https://twitter.com/abcgrandstand/status/1234237332686917633
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 03, 2020, 05:57:03 PM
Quote from: a cut above
I can't be the only one who thinks Dustin Martin is in danger of becoming overrated.

Take away his 2017 season which is looking like one out of the box and he's a very, very good player but a rung below the likes of Sam Mitchell who never garnered anywhere near the same praise despite being instrumental in four Premierships. That Martin was BOG in neither of his Norm Smith winning GF's tells a story, if he wasn't covered in tatts with a ratbag father the media narrative around him would be far more subdued.

Great one-on-one player but his overall output frequently doesn't measure up to his superstar media status. I would draw a comparison with Rioli there, but Cyril at least was spectacular in ways no other AFL player has been. Take out Dusty's stiff-arm and his game is effective but fairly vanilla.

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/general-afl-and-other-clubs-discussion-thread-opposition-fans-not-welcome-part-5.1223668/post-64491769
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 04, 2020, 03:36:44 PM
Quote from: Houli Dooley
I remember @scotty21 refusing to accept Richmond were any good the year they won the flag. I felt his pain. The incredulity that this laughing stock could be a genuinely relevant team was palpable

Quote from: jonovdp
I’d say we look more “Essendon” so far this pre-season.

(At Richmond) Hardwick & Caracella have been strongly influenced by Sheedy’s coaching methods.

They’ve been able to modernise Sheedy’s game Style, with tough, uncompromising defensive aggression. And taking players who don’t have the skills and making them valuable role players. Also giving opportunities to indigenous players, and watching them thrive.
https://discourse.bomberblitz.com/t/essendon-looking-more-richmondy/17842/21
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: lamington on March 05, 2020, 03:56:16 PM
Quote from: a cut above
I can't be the only one who thinks Dustin Martin is in danger of becoming overrated.

Take away his 2017 season which is looking like one out of the box and he's a very, very good player but a rung below the likes of Sam Mitchell who never garnered anywhere near the same praise despite being instrumental in four Premierships. That Martin was BOG in neither of his Norm Smith winning GF's tells a story, if he wasn't covered in tatts with a ratbag father the media narrative around him would be far more subdued.

Great one-on-one player but his overall output frequently doesn't measure up to his superstar media status. I would draw a comparison with Rioli there, but Cyril at least was spectacular in ways no other AFL player has been. Take out Dusty's stiff-arm and his game is effective but fairly vanilla.

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/general-afl-and-other-clubs-discussion-thread-opposition-fans-not-welcome-part-5.1223668/post-64491769

Absolutely laughable statement. I know I don’t need to preach to the converted but there’s a reason why opposition players put so much work into him and try and do a 3-1 gang tackle and he’s versatility forward and mid is precisely the reason why he’s in a special league. His 6 goal performance against the Lions was out of this world and the final he didn’t play well in albeit he was injured was against Collingwood and we got smashed in the middle.

Unlike other powerful midfielders like Fyfe and Dangerfield what sets Martin apart is how good his kicking is. He goes for these insanely difficult kicks which don’t always work and then people have a sook and say his DE% is low but he has absolutely demolished teams with his field kicking alone
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 05, 2020, 07:40:15 PM
A whole twitter feed of saltiness :lol.


Is Dusty in the conversation?
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ESU7_q-U0AAXC2b?format=jpg&name=medium)
https://twitter.com/7AFL/status/1235459674209570816

Quote from: TheRealOogieBoogieBush @JamieRadford66
The AFL media's love affair with everything Richmond is getting more nauseating by the day
Nauseated face

Quote from: @BrandwoodJack
And I’m the pope.

Quote from: Glen Edwards @royslions
Not even the best player to play for Richmond

Quote from: @pies_forever
You can delete this you still have time

Quote from: Scott Saunders @Gollytas
She is surely taking the pee here??!!? He has had 3 good seasons....

Quote from: Chris Whelan @cjwhelan
A bloke that's been judged his team's best player by winning a B&F twice in his career is now being called the best player to have played the game

Quote from: sqwamp @6ftsquales
I understand that a lot of Richmond supporters would agree with this statement  for most of them only started watching footy after 2017

Quote from: @JoshGerrans
No. Hes not even the best player in the league now. He just plays in Victoria.

Quote from: @sportingphotos
Why not, we’re awarding him everything else
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 06, 2020, 01:16:47 PM
Quote from: @edenjunex
Quote from: @LFC__George
He isn’t even the best on his generation. Smh don’t understand the media on the Richmond hype train
It’s so jading the AFL media constantly shoving Richmond/Dusty down our throats

https://twitter.com/edenjunex/status/1235544394687627266

Quote from: @ferracane_enzo
All about tigers atm let me work it out for them 1 DAMN 2    Start again ...    love  marlion Pickett  but geez.... great story. Got a lucky break   Did a blind turn and won a flag  that’s all I’ve seen so far according to fox there is only 1 team in comp

Quote from: @Melcatzzzz
Ok, Let’s settle it.... 🤷🏽‍♀️

#LetsSettleItSeries

Who’s the best current AFL Captain....??  #Captaincy #Season2020 🏉
Pendlebury.... 9%
Cotchin.... 62%
SELWOOD.... 24%
Fyfe.... 5%
200 votes · Final results


Clearly compromised.... 🤷🏽‍♀️

Should’ve known.... 🤦🏽‍♀️

Nicely played RFC fans.... 👏🏽👏🏽

Very funny 😂
 
Cotchin. Like that’s actually funny 😂

https://twitter.com/Melcatzzzz/status/1235007111651704836
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 07, 2020, 04:56:14 AM
Quote from: HardcoreGeelongFan
Dustin Martin isn't a player he's an AFL brand. Basically Richmond = huge club = $$$$. They need to make a Richmond great besides KB so they can sell merchendise for another 40 years. Expect more medals to come they can fit in another Brownlow at least

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/dustin-martin-is-better-than-dangerfield.1138545/page-160#post-64483301
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on March 07, 2020, 09:52:19 AM
At least we didnt rort the salary cap for 8 years straight like Gee long.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 09, 2020, 04:44:24 AM
Quote from: @frammopton
Quote from: @catpss
Quote from: @rickynixontoot
Richmond winless this year so far oh that’s right they’ve played 2 top 8 teams and been smashed ok got it !!!
Have they played at the mcg yet
That's because the MCG isn't quite ready yet after cricket.

https://twitter.com/rickynixontoot/status/1236506238793527296

(https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/attachments/1583592164652-png.835411/)
https://twitter.com/superfooty/status/1236162159635132416
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 12, 2020, 02:46:25 AM
In the reply to the 'Richmond Redemption' promo on Fox Footy:

Quote from: Footy Nut
What happened to the Eagles 2018 premiership rewind? Oh wait they aren't a Victorian side!!

Quote from: Keyser
Looking forward to seeing this after the outstanding job you guys did on the 2018 premiers

Oh wait......

Quote from: @wildebeestz
or the demons 1964 premiership rewind. Why focus on last years premiers 🤦‍♂️

Quote from: Burger King
With a bit of help also from the umpires and the AFL 🤬🤬

Quote from: stephen Butler
Must be a big tub down at Punt Road with so many drinking the bathwater of these all time greats

Quote from: Mike
Would rather stick nails in my eyes

Quote from: SCOTTY FROM MARKETING
what a load of poo lol
https://twitter.com/FOXFOOTY/status/1236886935345324033
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on March 12, 2020, 10:26:47 AM
I should become a psychologist, theyll be making a mint with all these no hopers come seasons end. Tiger Premiership number 13 is on its way and will be delivered by his eminence Pope Dimma the 1st and the brillant Trent Cotchin and his men.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on March 14, 2020, 12:28:04 AM
If we go back-to-back they'll need the white men in coats  :lol.

I should become a psychologist, theyll be making a mint with all these no hopers come seasons end.
Patient: "I need help. I hate all things Richmond."

Ramps: "Not a problem. Just lie down on this couch."

(https://dornob.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/13.jpg)

 ;D
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on March 14, 2020, 08:49:36 AM
 :clapping :snidegrin
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 19, 2020, 01:29:40 PM
Quote from: Thatsashame
Couldn’t disagree more Jay. Dustin Martin is way too overrated. Everyone needs to watch his games more closely. The amount of cheap goals he gets sitting in a goal square unattended, the limited possessions he gets per game he is nowhere near the stratosphere of Dangerfield and Fyfe. They influence and turn games literally by themselves. Dangerfield 1, Fyfe 2 and then daylight. The Bont influences games far more than Martin ever does. As soon as he goes into the centre, he gets the ball every time and the game changes and the same applies to Cripps, he just doesn’t have enough good players around him yet but he does far more work and carries everyone on his shoulders. A ton more than Martin ever has.

Quote from: freoguru
Hes not. He built a reputation in 2017 and we are looking at him and pretending that he is still the same player. Fyfe and Dangerfield are top two and the rest debatable, but Dusty shouldn’t even be on the list. How many of the best players dont make All-Australian after a complete season. None. All the other players who missed out got injured in some way, shape or form and Dusty couldn’t even beat Walters for a spot at half forward.

Quote from: IAP
I agree. Martin was ordinary for most of the year last year, and is good at getting easy goals. He’s not the bloke you stick in the guts who drags his team over the line, like Fyfe, Danger, Cripps and Bont.
Dusty hype has reached fever pitch.

Quote from: IAP
I watch them every week. He does bugger all for 3 1/2 quarters and then pops up on a flank with a good kick inside 50 and everyone goes nuts. Where was he when his teammates were doing the hard stuff for the rest of the game?
If you want to see a bloke who stands up when it’s counted just watch Cripps drag his team over the line last year. That bloke is a super player, and for mine he’s on a par with Fyfe for number one.

Quote from: MarkD
I would add that the truly great players tend to make the others around them better whereas I reckon Dusty benefits more because he plays with good players.
https://www.theroar.com.au/2020/03/13/the-roars-afl-top-50-players-10-1/
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on March 19, 2020, 02:22:42 PM
Too funny

The Martin Bio on the club website has Dusty rated as elite for disposals, Marks, Kicks, Clearances. The only stat he is rated below average is tackles

Some people cannot see the truth from behind their blinkered view
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: lamington on March 19, 2020, 04:30:59 PM
People just have selective memories. His goal against Richards when he kept his feet and kicked us into the final, when he pantsed Tom Stewart in the qualifying and surged it forward which got us the goal, the fact he gets scragged and illegally blocked when other players who play the same position get free kicks.

Some people just love to hate
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on March 19, 2020, 05:27:53 PM
No doubt they'd all be livid if their clubs somehow managed to poach him... :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 31, 2020, 03:44:25 AM
In response to Cotch's tweet  (https://twitter.com/tcotchin9/status/1242653560602390530):

Quote from: Jay @drunk_logic
I’m locking down for ACTUAL Brownlow Medalists and not the token kind.

https://twitter.com/drunk_logic/status/1243905036033216512

-------------------------------------------------------

Lloyd on Footy Classified last night when talking about if there would be an asterix put on a 2020 premiership said you don't hear people say Brownlow medallist Trent Cotchin or Sam Mitchell as it was won by Jobe Watson.

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on March 31, 2020, 09:26:41 AM
In response to Cotch's tweet  (https://twitter.com/tcotchin9/status/1242653560602390530):

Quote from: Jay @drunk_logic
I’m locking down for ACTUAL Brownlow Medalists and not the token kind.

https://twitter.com/drunk_logic/status/1243905036033216512

-------------------------------------------------------

Lloyd on Footy Classified last night when talking about if there would be an asterix put on a 2020 premiership said you don't hear people say Brownlow medallist Trent Cotchin or Sam Mitchell as it was won by Jobe Watson.



Haha.

At the end of the day, Watson had a great year I will give him that - but he and the EFC cannot prove that the hexarelin purchased by Dank wasn't injected into him despite being a 'professional body' in sport that allegedly tracks player movements, weights, diets, fat percentages etc :eyeroll:

Play victim until the end of time...
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on March 31, 2020, 09:42:35 AM
Lloyd can get stuffed.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Chuck17 on March 31, 2020, 11:56:18 AM
Just about the biggest flog of all time
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on April 03, 2020, 04:23:34 AM
Quote from: Tom Minear
Dan Tehan tells Sky News that Australians need to be “Richmond-like” and follow the lead of the 2017 @Richmond_FC premiership side in tackling the spread of the coronavirus as a team
https://twitter.com/user/status/1245591322305523712
Quote from: Greg Mullins @themulldogg
By Richmond like I take it he means not leaving home?
Quote from: @AdrianCorsello
The coronavirus is like the richmond as soon as they win the supporters jump on the bandwagon and spread everywhere to detrimental effect
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on April 03, 2020, 04:25:41 AM
Quote from: @AlexRanceFinale
Days since Alex Rance left Richmond without plausible explanation or congratulations from team-mates on 200 game career: 12

Number of fickle fair-weather Richmond members who only joined after Premierships: about 70000 🤮🤮🤮

#MightyTigers #GoTiges #Rancid #Culture #TigerTime

https://twitter.com/AlexRanceFinale/status/1211900234827042817

Quote from: @StevenK75671407
Caroline Wilson is a bigoted MUPPET!! 😠😠🤮🤮 Crap clubs like Richmond would have folded years ago, just like South Melbourne and Fitzroy if they had as few supporters as NMFC!! North Melbourne FC is the greatest Aussie Rules football club in Australia!! Shinboners 4ever

https://twitter.com/ExpatTige/status/1245051754053582852

Quote from: @DwaynesWorldSEN
Dwayne wants to know - who won the 2012 Brownlow Medal?

T Cotchin and S Mitchell  45.8%
Jobe Watson                 54.2%

845 votes · Final results

https://twitter.com/DwaynesWorldSEN/status/1244817180580909056
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: WilliamPowell on April 03, 2020, 07:03:28 AM
Have to admit that one from Greg Mullins (themulldog) is actually very funny  :thumbsup
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Hard Roar Tiger on April 03, 2020, 07:50:16 AM
In response to Cotch's tweet  (https://twitter.com/tcotchin9/status/1242653560602390530):

Quote from: Jay @drunk_logic
I’m locking down for ACTUAL Brownlow Medalists and not the token kind.

https://twitter.com/drunk_logic/status/1243905036033216512

-------------------------------------------------------

Lloyd on Footy Classified last night when talking about if there would be an asterix put on a 2020 premiership said you don't hear people say Brownlow medallist Trent Cotchin or Sam Mitchell as it was won by Jobe Watson.

The asterisk should be against Jobe himself for allowing himself to be part of that program
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on April 03, 2020, 01:24:52 PM
Quote from: @AlexRanceFinale
Days since Alex Rance left Richmond without plausible explanation or congratulations from team-mates on 200 game career: 12

Number of fickle fair-weather Richmond members who only joined after Premierships: about 70000 🤮🤮🤮

#MightyTigers #GoTiges #Rancid #Culture #TigerTime

https://twitter.com/AlexRanceFinale/status/1211900234827042817

Haha about 25,000 joined after GF. 75,000+ members BEFORE premiership in 2017 :D
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on April 06, 2020, 03:52:01 PM
Quote from: WCE
Ive been crying fowl about Richmonds fixtures for ages, so thanks for the solid back up
Quote from: Larrikin
so you finally admit that Richmond has been looked after with fixture fixing since 2017? nice of you to admit what everyone else has been saying
https://www.theroar.com.au/2020/04/04/how-do-we-make-the-afl-season-fair/


Quote from: Ricky Nixon
I’ve listened to the Richmond Team Song bc I’m in fear I may never here it again @mattricho0

https://twitter.com/rickynixontoot/status/1245199566799900672
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on April 08, 2020, 02:24:45 AM
(https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/attachments/17e94f1d-1d3c-4b9b-acea-b0b34838dcf5-png.853628/)
https://www.facebook.com/groups/therealaflalliance/
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on April 09, 2020, 03:09:02 PM
Quote from: K
Let's assume there will be a 2020 "season". Richmond's one and only on-field success is having zero injuries. (They are a crap side who plays crap football, in an era of AFL mediocrity, which has devalued the AFL premiership.)

The question is how this weird "season" would affect injuries. You could say, "They'll all be injury-free but unfit when it starts, so the one Richmond advantage is wiped out." But you could also say, "There will be 'games' played every 4 days in a crazy circus with no time for recovery from injury and with fitness being key also, so Richmond have the advantage."

You decide which of those arguments you think is more convincing...
Quote from: 90 nice
I think they'll struggle from now on
https://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/viewtopic.php?t=87154
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on April 09, 2020, 03:11:46 PM
Yep we are struggling. Haven't had a win since round 1
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: WilliamPowell on April 09, 2020, 06:11:15 PM
Yep we are struggling. Haven't had a win since round 1

 :rollin
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on April 18, 2020, 04:09:29 AM
Quote from: Bennnnnno
No games at the g mate.. you guys will be lucky to miss the spoon...

https://twitter.com/Bennnnnno/status/1250427735828074496
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on April 19, 2020, 02:57:09 AM
Quote from: Troy
If the AFL season was continuing, today would have been the first time Richmond would have played outside Melbourne since July 6 2019, some 9 months ago #plumdraw

Quote from: Troy
To be fair I don't follow Richmond so forgot they had Brisbane in week one of finals... Doesn't hide the plum draw though, a draw that won them the premiership last year

Quote from: Troy
It helps when you play all those sides at the MCG though. For example, playing west coast in Perth puts them favourites and if they win that you likely finish 5th and it's much harder. 10 straight weeks at home with no travel had them primed and fresh compared to others

Quote from: Troy
I don't know how I can make this simpler for you to understand.
When you had a fair draw: you were 8th
When you got every game at your home ground: you went up to 3rd
That's the point, it couldn't get any easier

Quote from: Troy
You did not finish the season with 10 games at home in a row in 2016. False comment..

Quote from: Troy
Apologies - last 7 at MCG, which lifted the side from 6th to 3rd. Do you not think having so many games at your home ground in a row was a huge contribution to your premiership win?

Quote from: Troy
Best team at the MCG by a long way yes. It's not Richmond's fault they are based at the G but they play so well there any having so many games there is a huge advantage

Quote from: Troy
Well yes but you guys play so well there and not so well anywhere else. Like WCE played better at Subiaco than Fremantle despite it being both their homes. Obviously it helps playing so many games at a ground you play the best at
https://twitter.com/troyn1515

Quote from: Munjit Singh
Richmond play 17 games at the MCG every year!!!

https://twitter.com/iam_msu/status/1251464087407476742

Quote from: Michael Lewis
Hahahahaha, so Richmond get 17 games at the MCG plus finals every year, but god forbid any Adelaide team playing at home for an extended time.

https://twitter.com/michaellewis_OT
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on April 20, 2020, 01:56:07 AM
Quote from: Nick Fahey
Ah, take me back to the days where Richmond were no good.
Quote from: Nick Fahey
Surely even Richmond fans get sick of their theme song #AFLGF #AFL
https://twitter.com/nickfahey96


Quote from: Munjit Singh
thats the teams problem....bottom line is you should only play 11 games on a home ground otherwise the league loses its integrity

https://twitter.com/iam_msu/status/1251719638292942849
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on April 20, 2020, 09:42:35 AM
How many games do the other MCG tenants play at the G? Pies for example?
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: taztiger4 on April 20, 2020, 09:49:31 AM
How many games do the other MCG tenants play at the G? Pies for example?

generally 1 more than us
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on April 20, 2020, 02:50:54 PM
The Adelaide Crows and Port Adelaide have been “instructed” they will have to play games interstate when the AFL season resumes as Adelaide Oval is “too big an advantage”, reports FIVEaa’s Stephen Rowe.

Rowey told FIVEaa Breakfast’s David & Will on Monday:

“How’s the VFL -- I’m not going to call them the AFL in this story. Adelaide is a monte to be an AFL hub. We know an announcement of return to play date due by the end of this week.

“Crows and Port have been instructed they’ll have to play interstate as Adelaide Oval will be too big an advantage, they said. Um hello? Richmond and Collingwood at the MCG.

“Give me a spell. Come on, fair dinkum.”

PENBO: “Richmond played 10 games in a row at the MCG in the lead up to last year’s Grand Final. That’s an outrage.”

https://www.fiveaa.com.au/sport/crows-and-port-adelaide-get-raw-deal-rebooted-afl-season
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on April 21, 2020, 12:05:27 AM
Kane Cornes on Footy Classified tonight pulling out his broken record and having another sook about us and the MCG  ::).

'It's not fair that Richmond (and Collingwood) play 14 games at the MCG every year.'

'The fixture lacks integrity when Richmond plays the last 7 games at the MCG running into finals.'


Caro tried to reply that there's 10 team in Victoria and that Richmond travelled as much interstate as any other Victorian side. When Caro asked Cornes where Richmond should play Victorian sides he replied "Marvel"  :stupid.

Caro also said Adelaide & Port have a bigger home grund advantage than Richmond which Hutchy laughed at saying Richmond are virtually unbeatable at the 'G. Caro replied that's only now because they are such a strong side and no one was complaining about this when Richmond couldn't hit a pie for 30 years. Hutchy could only say that Caro despite the lockdown brought her Tiger scarf with her which the others (Lloyd & Cornes) laughed at.

Lloyd also sooked about the quality of today's footy and finding quality players which Caro countered by mentioned us and Marlion Pickett. Lloyd replied 'but you're only talking about Richmond again'.

Oh boo hoo Lloydy  :nopity. Essendon being crap for the past 20 years doesn't make today's footy worse than the 90s  :sleep.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on April 22, 2020, 07:43:06 PM
Replying to @7NewsMelbourne about Dusty's training.

Quote from: Kyle Armstrong @Guts_Army
And most useless news piece goes too.

https://twitter.com/7NewsMelbourne/status/1252884520354738176
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: WilliamPowell on April 22, 2020, 09:04:45 PM
Replying to @7NewsMelbourne about Dusty's training.

Quote from: Kyle Armstrong @Guts_Army
And most useless news piece goes too.

https://twitter.com/7NewsMelbourne/status/1252884520354738176

 I have to agree

Not just the one tonight with Dusty but all of them

These nightly footy stories of interviewing players while they are in lockdown are not news

***yes I'm peeved this evening, in light of what's happened on the Eastern Day tomoght***
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on April 23, 2020, 01:51:47 AM
Quote from: Jay Clark @ClarkyHeraldSun
Victoria will be a footy hub
(https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/1252887715546140679/cPFfwMEl?format=jpg&name=small)
Quote from: Melcatzzzz
Dear Herald Sun snapper,
There are other clubs in the League
you can take photos of....
Sincerely,
The Footy Public.
Quote from: @shaunshane3
Let’s just scrap the AFL. and just go back to state leagues.
Quote from: Matt Kelly @SpinifexboyMatt
You gotta be kidding?
https://twitter.com/ClarkyHeraldSun/status/1252890515713847298

Quote from: Matthew Trim
Quote
Victoria could house all 18 clubs in one mega hub under a radical AFL plan to restart the season @clarkyheraldsun
18 clubs, one state: AFL’s radical restart plan
heraldsun.com.au
Good to see the VFL is a alive and well. No talk of joke ground advantage being unfair I would assume though!
https://twitter.com/matthew_trim_/status/1252903503741120519
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on April 23, 2020, 02:54:11 AM
TV networks love Dusty as he sells/rates as the No.1 player in the comp.

***yes I'm peeved this evening, in light of what's happened on the Eastern Day tomoght***
Blame the scumbag in the porsche doing 200kph on the Eastern. Gets rightly pulled over and then does a runner when the 4 cops are hit and killed by the semi-trailer. A low-life of the highest order  >:(.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on April 26, 2020, 01:33:58 AM
Quote from: kingkerna
Quote from: Surrey Blue
I can’t say if often enough but they [Richmond] cheat with their off the ball stuff and having been receiving a lot of love for it. Umpires especially.
Very hawthorn, give away a rough free when you're not going to win the ball anyway. If they miss it you're a chance.
http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=25888&start=3820

Quote from: 90 nice
Longer this covid thing wears on Richmond will struggle
https://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/viewtopic.php?t=87154
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on April 27, 2020, 01:45:23 AM
Quote from: Greg Roberts
oh surprise surprise surprise. Another night another AFL story and yet another focus on Richmond. 7s blatant bias and one sided reporting on this team is an absolute joke. The are 17 other clubs and hundreds of other players.
https://twitter.com/TazDevil66/status/1253978822392725504

Quote from: Dave @Slaternator11
Richmond fans are so lippy these days, but never forget when they are down they are the most fickle supporters in the AFL. Empty seats everywhere, unless i'm mistaken and their supporters actually go to the footy in fancy dress, dressed as a seat?

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EWfBEsqVcAArLuK?format=jpg&name=medium)
Quote from: Forza Bombers @jaydeybaby87
I never minded them until 2017. F**** intolerable.
https://twitter.com/Slaternator11/status/1254183313016647682
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on April 27, 2020, 01:46:28 AM
Former Geelong president Frank Costa says AFL Grand Final should be held at GMHBA Stadium if Cats make it.

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/teams/geelong/former-geelong-president-frank-costa-says-afl-grand-final-should-be-held-at-gmhba-stadium-if-cats-make-it/news-story/d78d44076e6a4e6e32109b7a054ad581
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on April 27, 2020, 04:13:42 PM
The grand final should be played at Punt Road if the Tigers make it.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: WilliamPowell on April 27, 2020, 06:23:36 PM
The grand final should be played at Punt Road if the Tigers make it.

 :clapping
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on April 27, 2020, 11:19:47 PM
Hutchy: What do think about a hub at the M.C.G. favouring Richmond?

Chris Scott: It's what usually happens.

Balmey: You'd want it at Kardinia Park.

Chris Scott: Now you're talking Balmey.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: wayne on April 28, 2020, 12:24:30 PM
How nice would it be to see Geelong get their wish of a Kardinia Park final, and get smashed to pieces  :lol
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on April 28, 2020, 02:42:13 PM
How nice would it be to see Geelong get their wish of a Kardinia Park final, and get smashed to pieces  :lol
The last time they hosted a final there, they did  ;D.

Geelong lost to Freo at the MCG the previous year and they spent 12 months sooking about that final not being played at Kardinia Park. So the AFL gave the Cats their wish and they still lost again to Freo :lol.

It kept them quiet for a few years until we beat them in 2017. Now they sook all the time about us. I'd guess we can thank them for 6 of our last 8 flags as we've regularly beaten them in finals on the way to glory ;D.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on April 28, 2020, 07:26:24 PM
Quote from: Greg Roberts
@7tasnews and I see another night and another AFL story about Richmond. Seriously how much more can this channel push a club. Any AFL story  has match footage of a Richmond game if not a story about a Tigers player or an interview with the coach or a player. #17otherteams
https://twitter.com/TazDevil66/status/1254754856658546690

Quote from: Wayne_
Here we go again. The @AFLlooking after its Vic Boys Club again. Hub in Victoria...who would have thought!?!
Home games for Richmond at the #MCG every week no doubt.
No bias in this comp...sure!
No doubt with no crowds, the GF will be held at the higher teams home oval too????
https://twitter.com/srellesw/status/1254704042556571648

Quote from: Jason Murphy
Quote from: @AFL
It's a simple question, Dusty or Fyfe?
Natalie does things Dirty Dusty couldn't dream of ( with or without mind altering substances)

But all we ever hear is dusty dusty dusty
https://twitter.com/AREA51UAV/status/1254736182837010432

Quote from: Dave @Slaternator11
A lot of their older supporters are the worst and you just know they never went to games in the 90s and 00s when they were stuffin terrible! God have a look at 95. All of a sudden they had a tonne of supporters, after 95 they went back into the woodwork faster then they came out!
Quote from: @ShortBlokeJosh
Back in the early 2000's, my mates & I got into a fair few Richmond games for free as their "fans" left at qtr/half time, we'd get their passouts & go watch at least a half of footy.
Quote from: @SamuelPower68
Richmond supporters are the most arrogant bunch of people in the country. The most useless team in the AFL up until 2017. stuff them, poo players as well. Gotta love Dimma though
https://twitter.com/i/status/1254183313016647682
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on April 29, 2020, 01:57:42 PM
Love the hate. We are back!!!
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on April 29, 2020, 04:10:16 PM
“Can you believe this story?” Kane Cornes told SEN SA Breakfast.

“God forbid WA clubs get an unfair advantage. These are the guys that travel four hours on a plane every second week while Jack Riewoldt sleeps in his bed for 14 weeks of the season playing games at the MCG.

“This is the same Victorian club who for seven weeks in a row did not leave the MCG in the lead up to the finals.

https://www.sen.com.au/news/2020/04/29/cornes-blasts-vfl-centric-afl-for-reported-shut-down-of-wa-advantage/
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 03, 2020, 05:43:09 AM
Quote from: 90 nice
Who here reckons richmond “supporters” are arrogant and gutless
https://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/viewtopic.php?t=87154


Quote from: Mike Goodwin
In my 40+ tears of following footy I don't think I've ever seen a team with more delusional supporters than the Tigers right now. FFS you'd think they'd just won 6 flags on the trot and been a powerhouse for the last 30 years. What ARE you lot on??
https://twitter.com/Goodo73/status/1256428884481855488
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: cub on May 03, 2020, 02:38:23 PM
Beautiful stuff  :rollin
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: georgies31 on May 03, 2020, 03:34:03 PM
7 weeks in row lool we travelled to the the Gabba for our first final get your facts right.Worry about your nothing club the Power.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 04, 2020, 02:22:12 AM
... as we know, the AFL makes the rules and it’s generally got a bias towards Victorian teams and that is just the way it goes. - Tom Rockliff

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/sport/afl/afl-players-prepare-to-step-out-of-lockdown-and-return-to-their-clubs/news-story/764ad6a0f408dcc5c468e40ac3c4b9ff


Replying to @superfooty @heraldsunsport
Quote from: Steve @dAddKiLLeR
If you go by premierships it would be Hawks, cats, tigers and why is collingwood even pictured?
https://twitter.com/dAddKiLLeR/status/1256427777907019777

Cats ahead of us Tigers in number of premierships this decade? :huh3


Quote from: Zach
stuff you lot are deluded.
Quote from: Zach
2018 Collingwood rolled you with ease you and you think you’re beating 2010 Collingwood......
Quote from: Zach
Every single premier of this century would beat Adelaide 17 and GWS 19 in a cakewalk.
https://twitter.com/zf_30/status/1256586549870751745
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 04, 2020, 03:18:11 PM
Travis Boak has pointed out Richmond's fixture at the end of the 2019 season as an example of the advantage Victorian teams have.

The Tigers played 7 straight games at the MCG.

https://twitter.com/1116sen/status/1257134602075828224

:nopity
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 05, 2020, 07:51:59 PM
Matthew Pavlich tonight the latest to whinge about us having 7 straight games at the 'G and also said the Grand Final should be moved away from the MCG and around the country like the NFL.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 05, 2020, 08:10:17 PM
https://twitter.com/7AFL/status/1257596160463605761

Quote from: "Marko Kowalski
Dusty way over rated as a player!... has no left foot, no defensive side to his game, completely unaccountable to his direct opposition... doesnt take a over head mark either... Just a good ordinary player
Quote from: Graham Robinson
7 Melbourne based game is a row, 4 flags in a row. Then chase the cash.
Quote from: Liam Lynch
None, but Dusty wins all the Norm Smiths anyway.
Quote from: Chris Doughty
Dusty lace out to Richo in the goal square. Richo with the spray off the boot. No flags
Quote from: Matthew Krinis
I'm not sure how many flags but I do Richo would have kicked just as many behinds.
Quote from: Philip Boyd
None because Richo would keep hitting the post
Quote from: Perry Cunningham
All of them because today's tigers never leave the g
Quote from: Keaysey
They’d finish 9th every season.
Quote from: lindy
none richo can't play, as for dusty get over yourself
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 06, 2020, 12:40:36 PM
The Bulldogs went into the match with a 4-2 record, a game behind the AFL's new 'glamour' team Richmond.

https://www.westernbulldogs.com.au/news/688963/on-this-day-houdini-doggies-escape-again

"new 'glamour' team"  :lol
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 06, 2020, 02:00:22 PM
Port Adelaide Captain Tom Jonas On Victorian Bias In The AFL Fixture

“It’s very Victorian biased,” Jonas said of the fixture on the Rush Hour with Bernie and Jars.

“I mean we travel, what, eight times a year, we travel twice in pre-season, like is that really necessary? We’ve got a two day trip up into Brissie.

“So there’s a little bit of a lack of balance, but you just gotta learn to live with it because it doesn’t seem to change too much.”

https://www.triplem.com.au/story/port-adelaide-captain-tom-jonas-on-victorian-bias-in-the-afl-fixture-160669
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 07, 2020, 02:34:32 AM
Quote from: Tim Lane
It’s a pathetic discussion. From whatever side of the border(s) you view it, lift your sights. The Vic teams play more games in their own state, the non-Vics play more one-team home games in theirs. Show me what flags haven’t been won by the best team.
Quote from: David @LizardKillSquad
2017 Tim. Crows were better than Tigers over the year...beat Tigers by 60 at AO but Tigers were near unbeatable at their home ground which is where GF played. Not hard Tim
https://twitter.com/LizardKillSquad/status/1257960396385730560
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on May 07, 2020, 08:15:54 AM
By the end of 2017 if we had to play Adelaide 10 times we would have beaten them 10 times. They lost the grsnd findl by 48 should have been 12 goals. Irredpective of where it was played Richmond would have won and comfortably.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on May 07, 2020, 10:07:28 AM
I think Crows would have won if it was at AO. Tough titties tho. Don't see the Crows of '97-'98 sooking, nor the Lions of '01-'03. West Coast has 4 premierships in the AFL ffs.

GWS last year would have lost anywhere in the world they were so scared.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: wayne on May 07, 2020, 04:23:43 PM
We were the best side in 2018, doesn't mean much now though.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 09, 2020, 07:13:12 PM
West Coast premiership coach Adam Simpson admits the fixturing makes it "difficult” for interstate clubs to be successful.

“This day and age with the 18 teams in the comp, the way the fixturing is, it’s difficult to win from interstate.

“I’ve gotta say it’s probably more of a challenge living it now, living it from the west, I feel like it’s a bit harder mate with the travel.

“One thing we don’t do is we don’t want to whinge, we don’t want to complain about it, it is what it is and we get on with it, we like to think that’s how we project things over here, but you know, there’s a challenge to it.”

https://www.sen.com.au/news/2020/05/09/premiership-coachs-admission-over-afl-fixture/
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on May 10, 2020, 10:02:48 AM
Didnt these idiots win the flag 2 years ago
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: georgies31 on May 10, 2020, 04:45:12 PM
They get there 11 home games interstate clubs fullstop massive advantage.Eagles pencil atleast 9 wins from them.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: WilliamPowell on May 10, 2020, 06:56:54 PM
I don't want to whinge but  I gonna sook anyway

Go figure  :wallywink
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 11, 2020, 02:05:57 AM
Sam Duncan is a lecturer in sports media and marketing.
The Age
May 10 2002


The AFL is an 18-team competition. Ten of the 18 teams are in Victoria. So, exactly how would the non-Victorian teams like the season to be structured? If all other clubs bar one are based in states outside of yours, guess what? You’re going to have to travel a lot.

Then there’s the matter of the home ground advantage. All non-Victorian teams have a distinct home ground advantage that most Victorian teams are simply not afforded. Take the Eagles, for example, who play 11 home games a year in front of 60,000 passionate, vocal, parochial fans, 90 per cent of whom are fervently barracking for them. For every home game, except the local derby against Fremantle, they have the added advantage of playing on a ground they are far more familiar with than their travelling opponents.

This advantage is something Victorian teams don’t always have. Sure, a Victorian team will play home games against non-Victorian teams, but at least half of their home games throughout the year are neutralised by playing against other Victorian teams.

This unfair advantage really comes home to roost in the finals, where non-Victorian teams can march into the grand final off the back off consecutive home finals, while Victorian teams are often left to battle it out against other Victorian teams on neutral grounds.

In 2018, West Coast, having finished second on the ladder, rightly hosted lower-ranked teams Collingwood and then Melbourne in Perth on their way to the grand final. The fact they were playing travelling teams was a huge advantage. Back in Melbourne, top-placed Richmond played their "home" preliminary final against lower-ranked Collingwood at the MCG, which happens to be Collingwood’s home ground. The home ground advantage was neutralised and importantly, so too was the crowd support. Richmond lost.

The fact the grand final is always played at the MCG and that clubs such as Richmond are afforded the luxury of playing seven consecutive weeks at the MCG while others are forced to travel every second week is a rusted-on bugbear of non-Victorian teams. And to be honest, the second of these gripes is fair enough.

But it seems some of the complaints non-Victorian teams have are less about the issue of fairness and more about the realities of playing in an 18-team competition, with 10 teams based in one state.

Yes, it’s odd having strange advantages and disadvantages inherently and unavoidably built into the season. But unfair? I don’t think it would be fair to say that it is.

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/level-playing-field-was-the-right-call-by-the-afl-20200508-p54r8y.html

 :clapping
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 11, 2020, 02:11:40 AM
Quote from: garry dearman
It's all been set up for a Richmond finals berth again how many premierships will the AFL give this team. 2019 the most hollow premiership in AFL history
https://twitter.com/garrysd/status/1259032123723276288

Quote from: Jack Hudson
Mate, Geelong have won three flags in the last 20 years and have been consistently competitive throughout that whole time.
Richmond has been a meme up until 2017 when they got blessed by the AFL with a string of good luck.
https://twitter.com/jhudson_10/status/1258982071264874496
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 12, 2020, 08:04:37 PM
Which match-up would you like to see restart the 2020 Toyota AFL Premiership Season?

Quote from: Kaela Arnold
Not Richmond sick of seeing them start the season don't need to see them restart the season either

Quote from: Karen Turnley
Wow two flags in a couple of years big deal. Flogs

Quote from: Joe Cameràman
Definitely two Melbourne based clubs, because it’s important to remind everyone that while there is the appearance of a national competition it’s still really just the VFL in disguise.

Quote from: JacksonIrma
Not Richmond Carlton anymore please God move on

Quote from: Jon Kelly
I’d like to see Gill take on the entrenched bias against non Victorian teams.
https://twitter.com/AFL/status/1260056274730749953
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 13, 2020, 02:49:50 AM
AFL instagram giving it back to anti-Richmond trolls with facts :lol.

(https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/attachments/8a5869e8-bfca-4247-9e1e-7c68b786a147-png.874322/)
Source: AFL instagram via BF.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 13, 2020, 03:03:39 AM
Quote from: Greg Roberts
So typical of @7AFL and @Stevo7AFL in their news story tonight. 18 clubs in the comp and of course they have to interview someone from their beloved Richmond. #youloverichmond #biasedreporting #17otherteams
Quote from: Greg Roberts
And? Anything and everything has to involve Richmond. Other clubs input is of value but @7AFLand @Stevo7AFL
  don't seem interested. Other clubs when they've been premiers never got the AFL and media love like Richmond.
https://twitter.com/TazDevil66/status/1259785666398793733



Quote from: @CoreyMcKernan
Our guest this Friday is now a dual premiership player with the mighty @Richmond_FC. @JackRiewoldt08 has spanned 13 years and has an AFL Hall of Fame resume in the making. Hear how he has made himself into a leader on and off the field. Thanks once again to the team @NationalMake .
Quote from: @JamieLeftPeg
Ask him how feels stealing a Coleman off Browny!
https://twitter.com/JamieLeftPeg/status/1259724800215224320


Quote from: Jack Hudson
The answer is simple. There's too many Victorian teams.

We're in a 'national' competition and over half of the teams are from one state.
Quote from: Jack Hudson
Didn't say they should go.

The inclusion of Tasmania and another team would make it a 20-team league. That's more travel for these clubs, and there's a chance for a 19-week fixture.  That's a lot more equality than what we're currently getting.
Quote from: Jack Hudson
I think they could avoid a team having a seven-game run at the MCG going into finals.
https://twitter.com/jhudson_10/status/1258161466001125379


Quote from: @Grady_Hudd
Are all Tiger fans avatars? I'm convinced none of you are real.
https://twitter.com/Grady_Hudd/status/1259765441397813248



Quote from: SuperFooty (AFL) @superfooty
It's Richmond's 2019 flag heroes against West Coast's 2018 premiership winners in a last blockbuster!

Who will progress in our Greatest Team of the Decade bracket?
Quote from: Coach
2019? Flag was a joke Eagles easy
https://twitter.com/caswynj/status/1259299140434948096
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on May 13, 2020, 09:53:48 AM
Quote from: Jack Hudson
The answer is simple. There's too many Victorian teams.

We're in a 'national' competition and over half of the teams are from one state.
Quote from: Jack Hudson
Didn't say they should go.

The inclusion of Tasmania and another team would make it a 20-team league. That's more travel for these clubs, and there's a chance for a 19-week fixture.  That's a lot more equality than what we're currently getting.
Quote from: Jack Hudson
I think they could avoid a team having a seven-game run at the MCG going into finals.


This actually isn't a bad idea IMO. Just FO two useless teams like North + Saints to NT and Tas, merge GCS into them both so that their lists are half competitive. 8 Vic teams, 2 WA, 1 QLD (GC dying), 2 NSW, 1 NT, 1 Tas, 2 SA.

17 teams, just play 16 games each with a rotating bye and go straight to final 8. Half of the teams are dead in the water after mid-season anyway are just competing for better draft picks...
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on May 13, 2020, 11:25:03 AM
Love the hate

West Coast
2018 had 13 home games at Perth and 1 away game at Perth Premiers
2015 had 13 home games at Perth and 1 away game at Perth Runners up
2006 had 13 home games at Perth and 1 away game at Perth Premiers
2005 had 13 home games at Perth and 1 away game at Perth Runners up

Richmond
2019 had 12 home games at MCG and 3 away games at MCG
2017 had 10 home games at MCG and 4 away games at MCG
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on May 13, 2020, 04:30:44 PM
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/the-tan-77-where-social-distancing-is-encouraged.1239450/page-69#lg=attachment874872&slide=0

 :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 14, 2020, 02:01:23 AM
Quote from: Zane Cornelius
Essendon were the biggest club in the AFL in the 90s. Reason Collingwood and Richmond have a large member base is that their banwagoners. How many Tiger supporters were there in 2007? How many turned up to games?
https://twitter.com/CorneliusZane/status/1260481515286396928

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on May 14, 2020, 07:59:32 PM
Cool story Bummer Boy...except that in 2007, despite finishing last, we still had the 4th highest home attendance of all clubs and third highest overall attendance in the AFL....try again Dipshyte Don...#bandwagoners :shh :shh :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 16, 2020, 01:05:34 AM
Quote from: Justin Manzano @Tin_Manzano
It’s ALWAYS richmond fans defending the #vicbias
Quote from: West Coast Eagles BigFooty Podcast @WCEBFPod
There’s a saying that is used for far, far more important topics, but if I may carelessly apply it to something as trivial as football: When you’re used to privilege, equality feels like oppression.
https://twitter.com/WCEBFPod/status/1260888546019119104


Quote from: maddie
Dusty’s just unimpressed that he had to travel to Marvel Stadium to undergo a test that easily could have been held at the MCG.
Quote from: BT @bentyers
Annoyed he finally had to retrieve his car from Yarra Park
Quote from: Casey Shaw @camcc87
Poor guy, must be feeling so homesick.
Quote from: @CraigBurford77
It's the furthest Richmond players have travelled in almost a year
Quote from: Dave @Boxhead_31
He's not sure how to go to a ground that isn't the MCG
https://twitter.com/_maddie_/status/1260495159583821826


Quote from: The Bell Tower Times
The AFL would get everyone to play on a cruise ship if it was Richmond's home vessel
https://twitter.com/BellTowerTimes/status/1260797256678031362


Quote from: Jack Beardsell
If the @AFL goes ahead without crowds there’s no reason for Richmond, Collingwood and the other ‘big’ Victorian clubs not to play away games at places like Geelong, Tassie, Ballarat etc.. doubt it’ll happen though
https://twitter.com/jckbrdsll7/status/1260490529927806976


Quote from: Geoffrey Cole (Monash University Alumni)
🇦🇺When the "AFL" Re-Starts in June, 2020 I HOPE that Carlton FC, Collingwood FC & Richmond FC GET "SMASHED" EVERY WEEK BY 150 POINTS From Now On In Until The End Of The Season! Geoff.
Quote from: Geoffrey Cole (Monash University Alumni)
🇦🇺Did Francis Bourke Get "Advice" From That MONGREL DOG "Jack Dyer" On How To "Smash" Opposition VFL Footballers In Victoria, AUSTRALIA? "Jack Dyer" Was Just A "EVIL" & "SADISTIC" JERK Who "HATED" MALE Sportsmen Like The "LOWLIFES" At The Traralgon Bowls Club. Any Takers???#AFL
https://twitter.com/mrgeoffreycole1
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on May 16, 2020, 08:49:49 AM
Who puts Monash Alumni after their name lol. Do these people vote for governments? God help us all.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on May 16, 2020, 01:47:57 PM
Yep that's all you need to know about that mouthbreather.  :shh

As for all the provincial flogs - start your own stuffing comp then, more than happy to bring back the old VFL - you know that comp you all begged to join. :shh :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 17, 2020, 01:05:23 PM
Quote from: @YahooSports
What's your favorite sports conspiracy theory?
Quote from: JamieJohnstone'sLethalLeftPeg

That Richmond doped their way ro two flags knowing there was no way the AFL would dare pull down another big team so soon after Essendon got caught.
https://twitter.com/JamieLeftPeg/status/1261445235520843777


Quote from: SuperFooty (AFL)
The Grand Final ... at Marvel Stadium?
https://bit.ly/2T8DYxo
Quote from: ❌FreoStomper❌🐸🇦🇺🇺🇸❌No Rent = Eviction
Oh no! There goes Richmond's hopes.
https://twitter.com/stinkchink/status/1261621931775672320


Quote from: Daniel Best
Heard the latest rubbish from the @AFL.

In summary, WA and SA clubs to QLD, all Victorian and NSW clubs stay put. So, no home games for WA and SA sides, but home games for the rest. That's fair and equal for the #AFL. 2020 will be known as the most compromised season ever.
Quote from: MetalMilitia
Gil, has done it, made the Afl become the stuffing Vfl once again.....he can kiss my arse
Quote from: Daniel Best
Yep. I'm out. The Victorians will be happy, and that's all that counts for the @AFL.

I'm sure Richmond supporters will be peeed off at playing the remaining 16 games at the MCG.

And absolute joke. Just a cash cow now, a pathetic excuse of a competition.
Quote from: MetalMilitia
I hear ya, been watching the sports reports here in SA, reporting that they would be forced to relocate interstate etc not long after the "illegal" training hub the crows were spotted EVEN THOUGH here in SA we can gather in groups of 10, so the vics sooked about that
Quote from: Daniel Best
Well the Vic sides can't relocate, the players are far too soft for that. They need to be with their mums. They all sleep in bunk beds with the lights on.
Quote from: MetalMilitia
Cant play away from the MCG now
Quote from: John Mothershaw
Probably got Richmond already engraved on the 2020 Premiership cup.
https://twitter.com/20thCenturyDan/status/1261133605671014400
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: WilliamPowell on May 17, 2020, 01:21:06 PM
Do these morons understand/ realise that it is the SA and WA governments and their refusal to give exemptions re travel is the reason their Clubs are heading to QLD. Not the AFL.

And in the case of SA, their blessed Adelaide Crows' actions that has impacted more than anything in that State?

 :lol
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 18, 2020, 07:25:18 PM
Quote from: Greg Roberts
Groundhog Day. Another night another AFL story putting the tigers at the forefront yet again. Great to see @7AFL giving more love to and honouring ttheir major sponsor, Richmond FC.
https://twitter.com/TazDevil66/status/1261943958457876480



SEN after midday today had an Adelaide fan calling in still whinging about the 2017 GF being played at the MCG  :wallywink.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on May 19, 2020, 10:26:45 AM
Quote from: Greg Roberts
Groundhog Day. Another night another AFL story putting the tigers at the forefront yet again. Great to see @7AFL giving more love to and honouring ttheir major sponsor, Richmond FC.
https://twitter.com/TazDevil66/status/1261943958457876480



SEN after midday today had an Adelaide fan calling in still whinging about the 2017 GF being played at the MCG  :wallywink.


I remember listening to some podcasts etc from the time and they weren't worried about it then.

They were convinced they would annihilate us anywhere haha.


Excuses!
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 21, 2020, 04:12:28 AM
Quote from: @sportsfanadl
AFL Media: “The real problem is with Adelaide clubs. They’re the source of everything that’s wrong with the league. Now look away as we give Richmond 7 games in a row at the G next year.”
Quote from: @BrendMacAFCFan
I reckon Richmond will get more games at the MCG next year and it will all be about $$$
https://twitter.com/BrendMacAFCFan/status/1262606735379886080


Quote from: Tom Southern
Team with poo supporters that spit on their coach and that being the late Danny Frawley! Pigs are richmond fans! You shouldnt follow such disgust
https://twitter.com/TomSouthern15/status/1262314057157103616
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 22, 2020, 03:07:10 AM
Quote from: @superfooty
Is there still a Victorian bias in the AFL?
Quote from: Mark White
There is only one answer to this obvious question and it’s a resounding YES ......... It’s quite pathetic when Richmond gets 8 home games to finish the season and Martin mocks the AFL by saying he coped with travel to away games at Marvel Stadium.
https://twitter.com/mgw7408/status/1262862878698160128


Quote from: @BobandAndySEN
JERSEY BOYS: NO.50

The best player to wear 50 on their back in VFL/AFL history is....
Ben Brown               63.8%
Ryan Turnbull             7.8%
Sam Reid (WB, GWS)  5.4%
Marlion Pickett           22.9%
Quote from: jamie macdonald
How marlion Pickett got more votes than sam Reid is beyond me. He’s played 1 game people. Yes it was a grand final but he’s played 1 game
https://twitter.com/pigzibit/status/1260142041029173251
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 22, 2020, 03:05:42 PM
Quote from: @superfooty
Alex Rance vs Matthew Scarlett!

You can only take one to build your team around, who would you take?
Quote from: Simon Leon
Tigers fans Rance, everyone else Scarlo
Quote from: Matthew
Scarlett and it really isn’t close.
Quote from: Justin Bird
How is that even a question, Scarlett by a mile
Quote from: Alan Burrows
Scarlett by the length of the Flemington straight
Quote from: Clint Waterhouse
Not sure why everyone has a love obsession with rance
Quote from: Nugget
Scarlett actually played on a player. Rance is like a cattle dog running around the outside of everyone
Quote from: Bailey McGlone
Let’s start doing some close comparisons, yeah? Scarlett with absolute ease.
Quote from: Alex Sar
Matthew Scarlett, professional Defender and played the game properly, he's not a diver, nor a quitter.
Quote from: John
So silly. Rance needs a defender to help him, so clearly your not building a team around him
Quote from: Jack Chapman
Is there a quota the Herald Sun must meet to mention Alex Rance per week? Scarlett easily.
Quote from: Derek Mathieson
Rance is better at simulation and that’s it.
GOAT?
You having a giraffe mate
Quote from: Star Wars HUB
Scarlett competes with Silvagni mate.. Rance is a tool and average
Quote from: Shmick
Scarlett could probably defend Mason Cox in an important game.
Quote from: joffwilton
Scarlett easy. He actually defended as well as created..
https://twitter.com/superfooty/status/1263635689414983684
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 22, 2020, 07:48:47 PM
Quote from: BloodyBoyloes
It’s funny how many Richmond supporters can’t just cop it on the chin that Rance wouldn’t even rate top 5 defensive player in the modern era by many, many people.
Get over it you sook.
Rance the most over rated defender in the modern era though for sure.
Quote from: STAY AT HOME XAVIER
I wouldn’t feed Rance if he was starving. The most overrated player of the century.
https://twitter.com/superfooty/status/1263635689414983684


'Rance' has been trending top 5 in Australia all day today on twitter thanks to salty opposition fans like these.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: lamington on May 23, 2020, 12:38:13 AM
I seriously wonder what sort of game people are watching. His effort against Sydney? Him shutting down the Adelaide forward like in 17 grand final? Arguably he was actually so good at being a one on one defender (or one on 7 in that 2016 gws annihilation) that from memory they realised that structures and processes over 6 seperate 1vs1 was essential for overall team success
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on May 23, 2020, 07:38:45 AM
First defender to ever get tagged from a key defensive post. These bozos have no idea. Jealousy is running deep during this period of Tiger domination.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 25, 2020, 03:14:40 AM
The Vic-centric AFL discriminates against WA clubs

Morgs
theRoar.com.au
25 May 2020


It happens every year: the much anticipated AFL fixture release.

Footy fans all across Australia eagerly await it. But when they finally get released the excitement quickly turns to frustration outside Victoria.

“Those damn Victorians!” I hear as I walk past a pub adorned with Eagles and Dockers scarves. This is the injustice that is consistently occurring in Aussie rules: the Victorian-central landscape of the AFL.

I grew up here in Perth and have lived here my whole life. What’s not to love – great beaches, fantastic weather, plenty of space, lots happening and a stellar sporting history in several codes.

But what I do not love is the way non-Victorian AFL teams and especially West Australian footy teams are treated.

AFL in our great state is a religion. Simple as that. It’s alright that you don’t know what is happening with politics or the news, it doesn’t matter if you don’t know who our premier or even the prime minister is.

But it is not alright if you don’t know who the Eagles beat at the weekend. My dad and mum brought me and my two brothers up in a diehard Eagles household. There haven’t been many Eagles home games I haven’t attended.

Freo – as much as I despise them during the derby – are a team with serious potential, but due to being discriminated against haven’t been very successful. I wouldn’t want to go as far as to say that it is akin to being treated like a second-class citizen, but it’s not much better.

Last year the Melbourne Demons had a whopping 18 home-city games out of 23. All other Victorian teams (the nine of them) had either 16 or 17 home-city games. Whereas the eight interstate teams had just 12. Yes, you read that right – 12!

I get that it is hard to run a multi-million dollar national sports league. And yes, with 18 clubs all spread out over the sixth largest nation by area in the world, it is sure to have some challenges.

Balance is a tough goal. I understand the AFL was founded in Melbourne and started off as the VFL with only Victorian teams, but more needs to be done.

Take the MCG deal, for example. The AFL signed a contract in 2013 stating that all grand finals until 2057 are to be played at the MCG in Melbourne.

This is mind-boggling. In pretty much all other sporting codes globally – the NFL, NBA, and locally the BBL and NBL – the grand final is never played at one set location, and different teams and cities share it.

If all these organisations – some multi-billion dollar leagues – can do it, then why can’t the AFL? It is the fairest way.

Former West Coast legend and AFL hall of famer Glen Jakovich said this about the deal: “If you want a truly national competition you have to adhere to what the national competition means, if a team earns the right to hold the grand final and they have got the stadium to facilitate the grand final then they hold it. That’s what the national competition in equalisation means.”

Take the recent COVID-19 fiasco. When the AFL temporarily suspended the season back in March, they said that players could only train with one other person (non-contact) per all states’ laws at the time.

On April 26, WA became the first state in Australia to start to ease these restrictions thanks to outstanding testing, low cases, and correct isolation and social distancing. So that would mean the Eagles and Dockers could train (non-contact) in groups of ten, right?

You thought wrong. The AFL said WA clubs can’t do this until all states allowed this, citing this as an unfair competitive advantage. Yet the Eagles and Dockers have to travel 3000 kilometres every second week while Dustin Martin wakes up and drives ten minutes to the G, 18 out of 23 games.

Port Adelaide great Kane Cornes couldn’t have put it better: “God forbid WA clubs get an unfair advantage. These are the guys that travel four hours on a plane every second week while Jack Riewoldt sleeps in his bed for 14 weeks of the season playing games at the MCG.”

This is another bang-on comment from Cornes proving how Vic-centric the AFL actually is.

To no surprise, Cornes’ comments were slammed by Victorian AFL dinosaurs like Matthew Richardson and Eddie McGuire.

Eddie McGuire, the president of Collingwood, is the only president from all clubs that regularly commentates AFL games. But even worse in 2018 he was flown out to Perth to commentate the western derby. Yes, the western derby.

It just doesn’t seem fair for a direct employee – especially a senior one – of a competing AFL club to be commentating on other teams’ games. It is biased and unfair and puts the wrong ideas in people’s heads.

The bias stems from the media. Commentators like McGuire were around when the VFL became the AFL. They are still caught up in the past. They want it to be VFL-centric.

The AFL needs fresh perspective, equality and new, innovative thinking to make the AFL more national and inclusive.

But with people like McGuire in the media, on footy shows and commentating, it is going to be hard to achieve. The AFL needs to do more to make this great game of ours more national and inclusive.

https://www.theroar.com.au/2020/05/25/the-vic-centric-afl-discriminates-against-wa-clubs/
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 25, 2020, 07:36:09 PM
Quote from: Keegan Carr
AFL trying the navigate through the biggest financial crisis in its history.

Richmond fans: wHy CaNt wE PlAy aT PUnT RoAd
https://twitter.com/ExpatTige/status/1264561968217837570


Quote from: Umair
This is the only negative when the season comes back.. the constant ass kissing of Richmond smh 🤦🏻‍♂️ #AFL
https://twitter.com/umairash11/status/1264419689570029568
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on May 27, 2020, 12:26:42 PM
(https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/attachments/87962a74-40e2-49dd-b79f-2b5f567b50d9-jpeg.881987/)
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on May 27, 2020, 12:34:28 PM
(https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/attachments/100743346_3031904886867059_2659549307094433792_n-jpg.882060/)
(https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/attachments/99441132_3031904896867058_215059518000726016_n-jpg.882059/)

Ah yes remember it well...was pretty poor coaching by KB that day standing a fetus on Ablett... :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 28, 2020, 04:44:58 AM
The AFL to apologise for Perth being far away.

https://www.theroar.com.au/2020/05/28/the-afl-to-apologise-for-perth-being-far-away/

 :laugh:
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on May 28, 2020, 10:32:30 AM
The AFL to apologise for Perth being far away.

https://www.theroar.com.au/2020/05/28/the-afl-to-apologise-for-perth-being-far-away/

 :laugh:

Love it
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on May 28, 2020, 11:13:15 AM
What's their solution?

How or where does one Vic club play another?
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: wayne on May 28, 2020, 01:22:57 PM
(https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/attachments/87962a74-40e2-49dd-b79f-2b5f567b50d9-jpeg.881987/)

She has a point, statistics show that playing footy on a Thursday night is easier.  :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 28, 2020, 03:54:44 PM
Quote from: Peter the Scribe
Very reliant on Jack Riewoldt. Look how average they became when he was injured last year. Tom Lynch looked slow and cumbersome too without Jack doing the hard yards. Not getting younger Jack. Still a good side who will contend but suspect the end is nigh. Despite the shallow thoughts of some who look at average age as their mantra it means nought if the youth don’t step up. If this season gets derailed then the wheels will wobble next year if not fall off. As we found with the Hawks, average players can look better than they are when surrounded by very good but ageing senior players and an out and out champion in Dusty. Even the great Dusty is ageing now.

https://www.theroar.com.au/2020/05/28/the-decade-that-was-richmond/
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 29, 2020, 10:12:35 PM
Quote from: hub360
all those members, all those sponsors ,record profits yet players set up go fund me accounts…wheels starting to fall off…..
https://www.theroar.com.au/2020/05/29/tiger-army-stays-loyal-to-punt-road/
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 30, 2020, 10:56:28 PM
Quote from: 7AFL
Richmond fans have continued to buy club memberships during the coronavirus pandemic.

The AFL powerhouse is still in a very strong position:
https://twitter.com/7AFL/status/1266154164993720321

Quote from: GoDees.
They will claim they have 150000 members now.
https://twitter.com/teamvanders/status/1266206672831176704

Quote from: Michael E
So have a bunch of other Clubs...just ssying..
https://twitter.com/Michael_60/status/1266203828530982919

Quote from: Josh
not like 7afl to only post about richmond
https://twitter.com/joshhowe101/status/1266258585203249154
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on May 31, 2020, 05:34:26 AM
Green eyed monster tracking well at every other clubs supporter base lol.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 02, 2020, 04:51:07 AM
Quote from: Mark Stevens
Cutout fans gaining momentum ... Pies a lock Round 2, Dogs Round 3 ... will superpower Richmond join in?
Quote from: Wayen blue tick OG
Superpower Richmond. You really are a key contributor to.... http://ratemyturd.com
Quote from: Chris Rode
Don’t call them a superpower. It goes straight to their head
https://twitter.com/Stevo7AFL/status/1267034737811419143
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Willy on June 02, 2020, 09:08:32 AM
God, these sooks are embarrassing.

I don't really use social media. Do Richmond fans reply to these remarks? Or do the sooks generally go unchecked?
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on June 02, 2020, 12:03:02 PM
This is by far my most favourite thread on any site. Check it daily. Best laugh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 03, 2020, 02:07:10 PM
Quote from: Benjamin Woolford
I'd pick Harry Taylor over Cotchin every day of the week and twice on Sundays. Taylor is a quality key defender who can swing forward, Cotchin is just a seagull
Quote from: Samuel Wyatt
Cotchin hasn't won a Brownlow
https://www.facebook.com/pg/FOXFOOTY/posts/


Quote from: Catsnlakers
I think it has to do with opposition fans being genuinely miffed as to how this Richmond team ( with a few top end stars but a lot of honest players ) have been able to achieve multiple flags...With us & the Hawks it was a non issue because we had genuine superstars on every line & winning just made sense.... Whereas with this Tigers team the narrative is that they are successful because of the MCG advantage...I don’t subscribe to this theory at all, but it gets profligated often from what I read/hear.
Quote from: kaiserchief13
Exactly, you admit it's not an even playing field. That [GF at the MCG] is the reason people say Richmond have been successful, because of the rules of the league, not that their team has been that good.
Quote from: kaiserchief13
2019 was better, but 2017 definitely was not deserved. They got pumped by Adelaide away that year, along with losing @ GWS, @ PA, @ Fremantle I think
Quote from: Dirty Bird
But why should any team deserve home ground advantage?

I’ve thought it for years

Play it at defending premiers home state

So I would’ve had Richmond vs gws at Perth stadium
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/which-premiership-side-is-the-best-of-the-last-four-years.1239787/page-24
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 03, 2020, 02:18:24 PM
God, these sooks are embarrassing.

I don't really use social media. Do Richmond fans reply to these remarks? Or do the sooks generally go unchecked?
If it's an AFL forum or the AFL facebook, instagram or twitter accounts then Tiger supporters reply but some of these sooks are obscure twitter accounts or opposition forums.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Willy on June 03, 2020, 02:27:56 PM
God, these sooks are embarrassing.

I don't really use social media. Do Richmond fans reply to these remarks? Or do the sooks generally go unchecked?
If it's a AFL forum or the AFL facebook, instagram or twitter accounts then Tiger supporters reply but some of these sooks are obscure twitter accounts or opposition forums.

I see...

Cheers.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 04, 2020, 02:19:16 AM
Quote from: @FOXFOOTY
The six MCG clubs are set to cash in from a shock multi million dollar deal
Quote from: Lachlan Steele
Vic bias
Quote from: Kingm1806
Geelong should never have to play a home game against an MCG tenant, at the MCG ever again. It's called a home and away season for a reason. Good luck to these MCG tenant clubs in getting this money, but you can't have it all....
Quote from: Brian Speaking
Another example of an inequitable competition.
Quote from: Keyser
So the AFL agrees to play the GF at the MCG for 40 years and the tenant clubs already advantaged by that arrangement get a loyalty payment from the MCG. Get stuffed
Quote from: Miguel Sanchez
#stilltheVFL
Quote from: Kelly Combe
Gladly, AFL house refund licence fees with inflation to SA & WA and happy to go back to state leagues.
https://twitter.com/FOXFOOTY/status/1268076066293202946
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 08, 2020, 01:13:49 PM
Quote from: Realist
Very well summed up. The only thing I would seek verification of is a comparison of Richmond’s recent interstate record to the other big Melbourne Clubs.
Quote from: Stirling Coates
A fair question. Collingwood are probably the only reasonable comparison given Carlton and Essendon have been poor over the same period, but here goes.

They’re [RICH] 2-4 at the Adelaide Oval, 1-1 at Optus Stadium, 0-3 at Giants Stadium and 0-1 at GMHBA Stadium. Even just down the road at Marvel Stadium (7-4) they haven’t been as consistent. Only the Gabba (2-0) and Metricon Stadium (3-0) have been happy hunting grounds.

COL: 8-2 at Marvel, 2-1 at Adelaide, 2-1 at Optus, 2-1 at SCG, 0-2 at Giants, 2-0 at Gabba, 2-0 at Metricon

ESS: 17-9 at Marvel, 2-1 at Adelaide, 2-3 at Optus, 0-3 at SCG, 1-2 at Giants, 2-0 at Gabba, 3-0 at Metricon

CAR: 5-17 at Marvel, 0-3 at Adelaide, 1-1 at Optus, 1-2 at SCG, 0-1 at Giants, 0-2 at Gabba, 2-1 at Metricon

Given the Tigers have won two premierships in this span, the fact their record is comparable to sides who have four combined finals appearances across the same span is damning.
Quote from: Realist
Good point Stirling. It’s definitely something they need to turn around. Dimma has always said….any team, anywhere, anytime but they need to back up with results.
https://www.theroar.com.au/2020/06/05/four-burning-questions-for-richmond-ahead-of-the-afl-restart/



Quote from: @TheTruthNMFC
Will crowds be allowed at North Melbourne’s game against GWS at Giants Stadium on June 14?
Quote from: Geoff Mathers
AFL will knock it back due to being unfair because 300 people might influence the result. But Grand final always at Richmond's home ground is fine.
https://twitter.com/GNMathers/status/1269508910689312769

Quote from: Daniel Knowles
Ridiculous, if fans are allowed to attend in one state let them go. If you want equalisation you wouldn’t have a hub for 4 clubs and you wouldn’t give Richmond after playing 12 of their last 14 at home an away game against WC in QLD.
https://twitter.com/DanielK1733/status/1269128112157032448
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 11, 2020, 11:42:45 PM
Quote from: Piesnchess
I actually dont reckon they are all that great, one of the worst premiership teams ever, really, we can beat em, but not if we miss easy goals as we have tonight.
Quote from: WarrenerraW
Lynch can basically do as he pleases. Rules don't seem to apply to him unless of course they're in his favour.
Quote from: Haff
Lynch cheated for 2 goals.
Quote from: Piesnchess
Tigers are not that great, or flash, but umps seem to love the bastards.
Quote from: doriswilgus
It’s disgusting what the umpires let Martin get away with,
Quote from: piedys
You'll notice what a talentless rabble Richmond are; their entire skillset evolves around scragging players off the ball when they aren't in possession, while the maggots let them get away with it.
https://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/viewtopic.php?t=87282&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=75
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 20, 2020, 08:15:51 PM
Quote from: csharp
Looking at their team tonight, I didn't realize how weak it looked without Dustin Martin.

So many key players are in their 30s too, like Cotchin, Riewoldt, Edwards and Houli, with Grimes, Lynch, Pickett, Caddy, Prestia, Astbury and Martin in their late 20s.

Can they really keep up the pace this year? Or next year for that matter?

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/are-richmond-hitting-the-slope.1241312/
Quote from: Bunk Moreland
Lol it looked weak at the 2017 GF. Every player who got called up was “who?”.... “who?”

Hasn’t hurt them
Quote from: Brunswick Trap King
Richmond are done. Riewoldt, Houli and Cotch look past it and Dusty can't stay fit.

Long decade ahead.
Quote from: Xtreme
Just like corona virus the Richmond curve is flattening!
Quote from: matey
Worrying signs. All the hype around Stack, Pickett, Bolton, Rioli, Graham .... the next wave to take them into a long period of success 😂😂😂😂😂.

Cotchin moves like he is older than Burgs!
Quote from: FlowersByIrene
Richmond's team has always been a bunch of largely talentless, skillless, useless pricks who got a winning culture driven into them through extreme running, pressure and knocking the ball forward at all costs. That gameplan only worked because it had a few stars to act as the circuit breaker when things weren't going their way m- Dusty, Rance, Riewoldt etc.

Now theres no Rance, last night there was no Dusty and they are beginning to be exposed for what they are. The same bottom 8 team they've been for the last decade with a conditional hunger for the ball. They're still the same bums who can't kick a footy, can't take a mark. They're still the average Asbury's of the world. The conditional Caddy's. The can't-stand-up Castagnas. The bad-news Broad's. The worst-in-the-family Rioli.

They're done. Hope you enjoyed your time in the spot-light Tiget fans because it's over.
Quote from: CakeEater
Given they hijacked the Ross Lyon gameplan, its no surprise they are.

Lucky they got 2 premierships out of it, will make the pain more bearable.
Quote from: La Dispute
Did anyone real see either premiership team as all-time great lineup?

The Tigers did well to capitalise on a good gameplan, but they're nothing more than a reasonable team largely carried by Martin, a few other A-graders and then a whole bunch of disciplined roleplayers. They also happen to play an exorbitant number of games at the MCG, which gives them a nice little advantage through any finals series they participate in.

I suspect they are pretty much done as genuine premiership threat.
Quote from: La Dispute
Cotchin won his Brownlow in 2012 and didn't play anywhere near that level across either 2017 or 2019. He's now slowing down and virtually a bit player himself. Rance fair enough, though overrated, Riewoldt was a very good player who is currently in complete free fall.

Lynch, Grimes, Prestia, Edwards are all good players - no question (I'd add Houli in here too, though soft, as we saw last night). After that there is a big drop off in quality. I'd say between 10-12 C-D graders who make the most of their limited talent or are fairly young - that's a huge amount for a supposedly dominant team. Someone like Soldo wouldn't make the best 22 in any other team in the AFL, to show you the unusual mechanics of the Richmond lineup.

The team has looked complacent in each of the games they have played so far, but that's not a bad thing at this point of an already compromised season. They can still correct whatever it is that's bringing about this current malaise.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on June 24, 2020, 01:18:48 PM
Some valid points with a truck of poison.

Need to respond next week.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 27, 2020, 03:36:21 AM
From the Herald-Sun comments section of their Lynch article:
https://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/teams/richmond/inside-story-how-richmond-beat-collingwood-and-hawthorn-to-secure-tom-lynch/news-story/5216cc9a0d611edabd14344ce098b101

Quote
After watching Lynch last week the Tigers can have him. Oh and let’s not forget the Tigers offered considerable more money to him
Quote
Let it go. He's a solid fwd, good for 50-60 goals per year. He's not Tony Lockett.
Quote
He’s not the biggest free agent ever, what about Ablett and Franklin
Quote
Is it possible for HS to feature other clubs and players other than RICHMOND, RICHMOND and RICHMOND!!!!!
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on August 05, 2020, 04:07:25 AM
Quote from: BLOODSTAINED_DEVILS
Bugger it. If the Lions had hit even half of those early missis they would have ended up running all over these flogs.

Quote from: sweatyman
Richmond 2017-20 are the closest thing to Essendon 2000 I can remember.
Quote from: alex.f.94
Geelong 2007-2011. Tougher, better skilled, more invincble.
Richmond were, and are, a we coached team of good average players with a few superstars to drag them over the line.
Quote from: darkknightpheonix
i remember people saying after 2017 win that they were the worst premiers ever almost.
they went to a prelim the next year not losing many games
they wont it last year with alot of injuries disrupting the first half of their season.
They will probably be the team to beat this year at the business end.

Think people need to wake up and realise maybe just maybe they are you know not just a team filled with average players with a “couple” of superstars.

cos you could technically make a case that that is any side. you could say that about geelong, hawthorn, brisbane if you really wanted to, doesn’t make it any more true than it does now.
Quote from: Alex.f.94
mmm I think Geelong, Hawks and Brisbane had better cattle across each and every line than what Richmond does.

Richmonds success is an indictment on the rest of the competition, more than anything imo,


Quote from: mcdonaldtriplemfooty
Richmond just never take the pedal off, they are the anti essendon, just one gear all game
Once they build a small lead they’ll just keep at you, it’s awesome to see

Quote from: mcdonaldtriplemfooty
The Essington hangover strikes again.
We are such a blight on the game we lull ■■■■■■ teams into faux form, when really they got used to not having any pressure applied to them for a game then get shellacked when playing a real football team full of actual footballers.
Richmond will kick over 100 against us.

Quote from: scotty21
We legit might not even score Dreamtime

Can we forfeit the Dreamtime game?
Quote from: Heffsgirl
the only highlight I see is if Martin breaks his arm doing a high fend off.

I’m really ■■■■■■■ sick of Richmond
Quote from: Finding_Nemo
Townsend to grab his fend off arm and pull it out of his socket as he’s getting brought to ground
https://discourse.bomberblitz.com/t/non-essendon-games-in-the-20-days-of-footy-mega-thread/19118/1045
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on August 17, 2020, 01:23:50 PM
‘Tough if it was Dustin’: Cornes queries double standard as rookie Swan cops mega ban

https://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/tough-if-it-was-dustin-cornes-queries-double-standard-as-rookie-swan-cops-mega-ban/news-story/4e6b47a5c1db3eccc5d323334edfe427

Why mention Dusty? For the clickbait (http://oneeyed-richmond.com/forum/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif).


Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on August 17, 2020, 01:37:44 PM
‘Tough if it was Dustin’: Cornes queries double standard as rookie Swan cops mega ban

https://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/tough-if-it-was-dustin-cornes-queries-double-standard-as-rookie-swan-cops-mega-ban/news-story/4e6b47a5c1db3eccc5d323334edfe427

Why mention Dusty? For the clickbait (http://oneeyed-richmond.com/forum/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif).




They have hung that kid out to dry. Made an example of him.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on August 19, 2020, 03:31:29 PM
Robinson rips "w***ker" Lynch ...

VIDEO: https://www.foxsports.com.au/video/afl/afl/robinson-rips-wer-lynch!783362

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

'He thinks he's that good': Mitch Robinson takes aim at Lynch

By Michael Whiting
afl.com.au
19 August 2020


BRISBANE hardman Mitch Robinson has taken aim at Richmond star Tom Lynch for his on-field behaviour and decision to join the Tigers.

Lynch was fined $2000 for two separate striking incidents in Monday night's win over Gold Coast.

It came just two weeks after he copped a $500 fine for shoving Alex Witherden's head into the ground while the young Lion wasn't watching.

After a Twitter post showed Gold Coast defender Sam Collins not flinching at attempted intimidation from Lynch, Robinson responded: "why would he, there's no ground to push it into".

Quote
Why would he, there’s no ground to push it into.
— Mitch Robinson (@MitchRobinson05) August 17, 2020

Then on his Twitch gaming livestream, Robinson responded in no uncertain terms to a question suggesting Lynch was the Greatest Of All Time.

"Is he? Do you know him do you…" Robinson said.

The veteran wingman then took aim at Lynch's decision to leave the wooden spoon Suns at the end of 2018 and join the Tigers via free agency.

"He went to a good team to get success, that's what he did," Robinson said.

"He went to a premiership team and thinks he's that good."

https://www.afl.com.au/news/487808/-he-thinks-he-s-that-good-robbo-takes-aim-at-lynch
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on August 19, 2020, 04:08:55 PM
Mitch "Deliverence" Robinson :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Willy on August 19, 2020, 05:29:53 PM
Mitch "Deliverence" Robinson :shh

 :lol

"He got a real pretty mouth ain't he?"...
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Francois Jackson on August 19, 2020, 08:58:10 PM
thanks Mitch

https://7news.com.au/sport/afl/mitch-robinsons-tom-lynch-sledge-will-fire-up-richmonds-premiership-hunt-c-1250428?fbclid=IwAR14UJnDFQ8IEPP0nVyMa6RfyxsnI_zCx0G-zpig_xINrB-yssl0_fDKo6Y
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on August 20, 2020, 09:59:33 AM
I hope we meet Brisbane at the Gabba in finals and give them another outright fisting
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Francois Jackson on August 20, 2020, 05:48:33 PM
I hope we meet Brisbane at the Gabba in finals and give them another outright fisting

This. :thumbsup

i put that outburst down to one thing and thats jealousy.

Mitch has seen us win 2 flags and fagan, judging by his presser the other week couldnt stop mentioning how good they were in all games against us. he looked filthy.

hatred is there.

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on August 20, 2020, 06:35:33 PM
BRISBANE has laughed off Mitch Robinson's online criticism of Tom Lynch, saying he hadn't apologised to the playing group and there was no need to.

https://www.afl.com.au/news/487994/-it-s-just-mitch-lions-laugh-off-hard-man-s-swipe-at-star-tiger
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on August 20, 2020, 06:37:37 PM
IIRC we offered Robanjosin a one year contract after Carlton gave him the arse but he wanted two years...so we went with Taylor Hunt instead...probably still feels insulted...... :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Eat_em_Alive on August 20, 2020, 07:49:26 PM
 :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Knighter on August 20, 2020, 08:05:07 PM
BRISBANE has laughed off Mitch Robinson's online criticism of Tom Lynch, saying he hadn't apologised to the playing group and there was no need to.

https://www.afl.com.au/news/487994/-it-s-just-mitch-lions-laugh-off-hard-man-s-swipe-at-star-tiger

He can apologise when Lynch rubs his ugly mug into the dirt next time we play
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on August 20, 2020, 08:31:04 PM
The hatred right now is extreme and I love it.

Can't hit up radio, Facebook, TV or internet without some carrying on about how dirty our players are, snipers, dogs, love children, kissed on the willy by fate/injury gods/umpire's/MRO.

I love it.

More than ever I want to win the flag this year so we can smoosh it in their faces another 12 months. All stuffing summer
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Francois Jackson on August 21, 2020, 07:09:35 AM
Would be great Andy.

It’s definitely ramped up like never before. I assume it was like this in 60’s and 70’s

These idiots just gave us a bit more ammo :thumbsup

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on August 22, 2020, 02:05:44 PM
3aw replayed Daniel Harford saying Richmond are showing a brittleness this year and that we're perhaps not coping with being the hunted. 
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: georgies31 on August 22, 2020, 02:20:55 PM
Makes me laugh honestly do these people look at our line up and the outs we have and outs we have had all year or it's only pies with injuries .For us still challenging for a top 4 spot fair effort.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: big tone on August 22, 2020, 03:08:05 PM
What about the fact the boys haven’t been home for months?? And some would be missing their families.
I’d be a little crappy too living out of a suitcase for that long.

Just because these guys play a sport for a living or get paid well, doesn’t mean things don’t get hard for them.

I love our aggression, I love that Lynch isn’t putting up with poo and I loved what Dimma said.
He wasn’t saying it was soft that he cried, he was saying it was weak for giving up so early in a GF.

Stuff the lot of them.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on August 23, 2020, 01:01:28 AM
Bomber fans on SEN sooking post-game calling Grimes & Floss divers :huh3  .  ::)

The hatred is sending them nuts :rollin. 
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Knighter on August 23, 2020, 05:13:38 AM
Bombers fans abusing Grimes and Vlossy on their insta. Sick pricks deserve another 10 years of misery.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on August 23, 2020, 10:40:12 AM
Some of our supporters are as bad as the oppos the abuse levelled at Dan Rioli from our supporters last night on forums was a disgrace. So we can talk about what the oppos say but we are almost as bad.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Francois Jackson on August 23, 2020, 10:42:30 AM
What did they say about them Knighter?

Good feeling ending the bombers season
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: WilliamPowell on August 23, 2020, 11:01:35 AM
Some of our supporters are as bad as the oppos the abuse levelled at Dan Rioli from our supporters last night on forums was a disgrace. So we can talk about what the oppos say but we are almost as bad.

Clearly directed mainly at me Ramps? Yes or No?

With respect, it seems it is OK for you or anyone else to continually criticise RFC players they don't like or rate for whatever reason but if someone is critical of a player you or someone else likes then they are as bad as opposition supporters?

Dan Rioli made a very poor decision last night that against a really good opponent would most likely cost us a game. He deserves to be criticised for that. Up until that point he had played a good game but that was extremely poor option he took and thankfully didn't cost us

I understand that the term I used in one of my posts  "Shame on you" has upset you and you have voiced that anger towards me on another thread. And I'll chop that....

But since then you have indirectly continued your rage towards me and that is your prerogative as seen in this post. But I am not you can have it both ways. You can't constantly "bag or pot" players you don't rate and then get furious when anyone criticises a player you rate.

Just my take
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on August 23, 2020, 11:25:58 AM
No. Primarily at the numpties on other forums who seem to forget that footy is just a game.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: WilliamPowell on August 23, 2020, 11:30:49 AM
No. Primarily at the numpties on other forums who seem to forget that footy is just a game.

Think we are all guilty of that sometimes  :thumbsup
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Damo on August 23, 2020, 12:14:38 PM
No. Primarily at the numpties on other forums who seem to forget that footy is just a game.

Footy isn’t just a game

For starters it’s a business first .. this season wouldn’t have even been contemplated if it was just a game ... and for plenty out there it’s a way of life and something to look forward to , in an otherwise crappy existence
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Knighter on August 23, 2020, 12:18:58 PM
What did they say about them Knighter?

Good feeling ending the bombers season

Grimes has been getting death threats and direction to commit suicide.  I hope the Police track these pricks down and criminal charges are laid.  Callum Ward copped it from the same club supporters.  Unacceptable at any walk of life.  They need to be made an example of.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on August 23, 2020, 12:48:24 PM
The same supporter base that regards Louganis Lloyd as a legend.... :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: georgies31 on August 23, 2020, 01:13:56 PM
The media are on a witch hunt on us big-time with Lynch etc beyond a joke.Club should make a media ban fullstop teach them a lesson.The same thing happen last year when that peanut Barrett was pushing for us not to get a first round pick for Ellis.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on August 23, 2020, 01:20:34 PM
Worsfold had a sook in his presser last night:

The normally reticent Worsfold made it clear he thought it was a dubious decision to award Richmond defender Dylan Grimes a free kick for a push in the back when he fell forward, as McDonald-Tipungwuti took a chest mark over the back of a pack and ran into an open goal.

Bombers coach John Worsfold says umpire's decision had a "massive impact" on the outcome of the game.

He said the decision had a "massive impact".

"It obviously was something pretty drastic to overturn a kick like that. Unfortunately that is the way the umpires called it and we have to cop that, but it was a pretty critical part of the game," Worsfold said.

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/dubious-decision-halted-bombers-momentum-john-worsfold-20200822-p55oda.html


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

And the media promoted and encouraged the sooking last night.

3aw replayed Jordan "#freekickHawthorn" Lewis last night saying Grimes & Floss staged.

Then add this article from the AFL website:

Staging Tigers?

Players have been trying to con umpires forever but in a low scoring game the impact of a mistake can be huge.

No one can know for certain the impact a player feels but Vlastuin threw his head back after he copped a slap from Tom Bellchambers when the game was tight. He won a 50-metre penalty for contact that looked minimal and kicked a goal.

A push in the back was awarded to Grimes after McDonald-Tipungwuti had goaled in the second quarter when the contact looked slight. It didn't change the result but it was frustrating to watch.

Source: The Age (https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/richmond-extend-winning-streak-over-essendon-despite-mosquito-bites-20200822-p55ocd.html)


:nopity
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: big tone on August 23, 2020, 01:35:51 PM
Cue Andy Maher and Bob Murphy on SEN this week.

I can hear it now, “ it just doesn’t sit right with me”

 
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tigeritis™©® on August 23, 2020, 06:01:35 PM
Channel 7 shows the best things of the weekend highlights - a series of highlights so far this weeks games.

Showing four highlights from the Essendrug v Richmond game - all four highlights were Essendon highlights.  :rollin
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: JP Tiger on August 24, 2020, 12:55:39 PM
I think the poll on this thread needs to be updated. 

Add Essendon & their supporters to the list!      ::)    :P 
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Francois Jackson on August 24, 2020, 01:08:02 PM
i couldnt find anywhere else to put it, but does anyone else notice how great fair duck is when discussing our club?

he nails it more often than not, compared to the other fools
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on August 24, 2020, 10:35:29 PM
Cornes just said the umps cost Essendon the game :rollin.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Hard Roar Tiger on August 25, 2020, 04:24:48 PM
Cornes just said the umps cost Essendon the game :rollin.

Not having a third of our inside 50’s?
That’s why I don’t bother with him
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on August 26, 2020, 02:30:19 PM
Callers to SEN in the last half an hour:

Bombers fan: "I don't care what anyone says, everyone knows Grimes & Vlastuin staged for those frees."

Pies fan: "How did the tribunal make that decision to let both Richmond players off especially when one is a well known recidivist? Thursday night is going to be the stagers vs the duckers. Let's see how these Richmond fans react when Shuey ducks for frees like he did to win that final after the siren against Port."
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Hard Roar Tiger on August 26, 2020, 06:45:11 PM
At least the employees  ;D of the club know and follow the covid rules.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on August 28, 2020, 02:22:27 PM
From SEN txts:

"Thomson Dow only looked good because he was surrounded by a premiership team. Let's see how good he would be if he was playing for Adelaide."

"Dustin Martin is nowhere near the best player in the AFL. Dangerfield is as he has a much higher footy IQ than Martin." 
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on September 23, 2020, 03:50:18 AM
thanks Mitch

https://7news.com.au/sport/afl/mitch-robinsons-tom-lynch-sledge-will-fire-up-richmonds-premiership-hunt-c-1250428?fbclid=IwAR14UJnDFQ8IEPP0nVyMa6RfyxsnI_zCx0G-zpig_xINrB-yssl0_fDKo6Y

He's regretting it now and trying to suck up lol.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mitch Robinson: I absolutely respect Tigers and have no issue with Lynch

By Jake Niall
The Age
September 23, 2020


Brisbane's colourful veteran Mitch Robinson says he has absolute respect for Richmond and nothing negative to say about the Tigers' gun key forward Tom Lynch, whom Robinson lashed on social media last month.

Robinson, who had called Lynch "a wanker'' on his twitch live stream and criticised the Tiger forward for crossing from the Suns to a good team "to get success'', told The Age that his comments had been blown out of proportion and he was not concerned about how those words would be received by Lynch and the Tigers in next week's qualifying final.

"Not really. I haven't thought about it since I made the comments,'' Robinson said, when asked if he thought his comments would fire up Lynch. "I honestly made it on the stream when I was playing a video game. I wasn't really thinking about too much going there with the small community that I have.

"So I haven't actually thought about. I was cheering on Collingwood last night (against Port Adelaide) so it would have been pretty cool to win minor premiers, but regardless, we're playing Richmond this next week. I don't think they're going to be thinking about it too much - a bit water off a duck's back, I'm pretty sure.''

Robinson said he made his comments on Lynch - which surfaced after Lynch was the subject of criticism for on-field incidents against Gold Coast - after Brisbane played Richmond, not thinking they would become a headline.

Robinson, who also made reference to Lynch pushing Lion teammate Alex Witherden's face into the turf - the incident that sparked his ire - was rebuked by his coach Chris Fagan for his comments.

"I made the comments after the game against them, down at Gold Coast we played against them. It's just my opinion at the time. I didn't really think it was going to be headlines or anything like that - it got blown out of proportion a little bit.

"But in saying that, it's just comments I made and, you know, it's no disrespect to the Richmond footy club. I've absolutely got a lot of respect for them and what they're about. So I'm looking forward to the game next week, I'm sure they are too.

"Tom's actually a very good player, I've got nothing, really, bad to say about him on-field or off-field. It's just my opinion at the time. I'm looking forward - if he plays next week - that battle.''

But Robinson felt the Lions were better prepared to meet the Tigers, who have beaten them repeatedly - including in last year's qualifying final and in that encounter several weeks ago.

"It feels like we're better prepared. Obviously last year was a new feeling for a lot of players in that team. We've got a similar squad.

"So I think that we're going to be better prepared going into this one, especially after playing Richmond three times in 12 months.

"We've been pretty close to them a couple of times. Obviously the goalkicking let us down this year when we played against them, but scoreboard pressure with them would help us a lot to get the win.''

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/mitch-robinson-i-absolutely-respect-tigers-have-no-issue-with-lynch-20200922-p55y5r.html
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on September 23, 2020, 03:36:44 PM
Quote from: 90 nice
Thing is Richmond have not had to battle like the other teams and seam to have everything made for them too.

Arrogantly it always has to be richmond all the bloody time its like its their god given right.

Tigers make me sick prancing around
Quote from: 90 nice
I guess its because i live in richmond i hate all of this yellow and black BS around the place makes me sick. I live a handball away from punt rd oval too. I cant stand some of their arrogant players lynch dustin cotchen grimes reiwolt they are all the same. Along with their phoney supporter pricks.
Quote from: K
They are not worthy premiers. This is an AFL era of mediocrity. There are too many clubs and the talent, which was probably in limited supply anyway, has been spread too thinly. It's worse than that, really. The talent may have been simply wasted and lost, as GC and GWS screwed up the bodies or footy educations of a generation of kids. Meanwhile, NBA etc. lure kids to the dark side, which did not happen 30 years ago.

Rich's main achievement is to be virtually injury-free for four years. For the first two years, they were injury-free the entire two years. Last year, it looked like they'd finally have injuries (and they played like wooden spooners in that period), but magically they had all recovered when finals rocked around. This year we're at the pointy end of the season, and if reports that Prestia and Lynch are in full training are correct, they again are almost injury-free.

It's disturbing the other clubs haven't worked out the injury and fitness stuff. Normally secrets don't last more than about 18 months. Ideally, the bottom clubs would have poached Rich's fitness and medical staff by now.

I don't know how clubs expect to win finals against a club's full senior side when they are playing half of a VFL side because of their injury carnage.
Quote from: Pies4shaw
I don't agree with most of K's comments. I do, though, agree that we are watching an AFL era in which none of the teams has as many good players as the great sides of the past.

My point was that, objectively, Richmond are not "one of the greatest teams ever" and will not be, even if they win the flag again this year. Not even a Richmond supporter would say that.
Quote from: 90 nice
Richmond have been given everything on a platter to them.

Another easy ride in the finals for richmond nicely set up too back to back flags here we come and i reckon they will make it 3 straight next year too.
https://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/viewtopic.php?t=86974&start=30


Quote from: versichili
Well SEVEN'S AFL Finals ad is as bias to Richmond as possible, mythicizes players to the point that I thought it was a promo for 300 and claims this will be the greatest grand final ever. Are they using Trump's publicist?

https://twitter.com/versichili/status/1308385268802572288

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tigeritis™©® on September 23, 2020, 09:19:19 PM
https://imgur.com/gallery/XKlg3Un

(https://i.imgur.com/yolCHpO.mp4)
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on October 10, 2020, 10:52:49 PM
... the AFL social media account went a step further – rubbing salt in the wounds of St Kilda supporters who had plenty of other reasons to be peeved at the umpiring by celebrating this moment.

Quote
When Dusty wants the footy, you let him have the footy 🏉#AFLFinals

pic.twitter.com/NLTJNZUcIY

— AFL (@AFL) October 9, 2020

“When Dusty wants the footy, you let him have the footy,” the AFL wrote, as Martin took the ball from the hands of teammate Shai Bolton after Bolton had clearly gained possession first.

But the Dusty love-fest ignored one critical piece of information footy followers were quick to remind the AFL about – it’s against the rules to hand the ball to another player.

“The audacity to tweet this,” replied Sam Colquhoun.

“The social media guy doesn’t even know the rules,” added Robert Tinney.

“Caption should read: When Dusty throws the footy, you let it be legal,” wrote James Cockman.

“AFL’s been in Queensland long enough for rugby passing, although might need to wait til next year to work out they can’t go forward,” Daniel Brettig said.

“Every single comment pointing out it’s a throw. The AFL happy as the ball kept moving and it’s the golden child from the golden team. Sick of it,” wrote another.

https://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/afl-so-in-love-with-dustin-martin-it-forgot-the-rules/news-story/d39fb63806bc797d2176cce2648bb1f0
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: wayne on October 11, 2020, 07:03:49 AM
Slobbo put up a twitter poll calling Vlaustin a cheat
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Owl on October 11, 2020, 09:33:17 AM
Gee they really are a bitter bunch of Tiger hating bunnies!  A lot of hating on  teams doing well hiding a bit of grudging respect but these pricks are off their t@s.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Francois Jackson on October 11, 2020, 11:46:17 AM
Slobbo put up a twitter poll calling Vlaustin a cheat

then it was deleted i think?

I saw it last night on NV's twitter but then when you click on slobbos remark it says deleted

what a flog that guy is fair dinkum



Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Willy on October 11, 2020, 12:18:37 PM
He deleted it and apologized.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tigeritis™©® on October 11, 2020, 12:23:19 PM
Slobbo put up a twitter poll calling Vlaustin a cheat

then it was deleted i think?

I saw it last night on NV's twitter but then when you click on slobbos remark it says deleted

what a flog that guy is fair dinkum
I wonder if he called James Hird a cheat?  Or anyone else at his drug cheating club? 
If I had Twitter I would have asked him that very question.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: lamington on October 11, 2020, 01:15:53 PM
... the AFL social media account went a step further – rubbing salt in the wounds of St Kilda supporters who had plenty of other reasons to be peeved at the umpiring by celebrating this moment.

Quote
When Dusty wants the footy, you let him have the footy 🏉#AFLFinals

pic.twitter.com/NLTJNZUcIY

— AFL (@AFL) October 9, 2020

“When Dusty wants the footy, you let him have the footy,” the AFL wrote, as Martin took the ball from the hands of teammate Shai Bolton after Bolton had clearly gained possession first.

But the Dusty love-fest ignored one critical piece of information footy followers were quick to remind the AFL about – it’s against the rules to hand the ball to another player.

“The audacity to tweet this,” replied Sam Colquhoun.

“The social media guy doesn’t even know the rules,” added Robert Tinney.

“Caption should read: When Dusty throws the footy, you let it be legal,” wrote James Cockman.

“AFL’s been in Queensland long enough for rugby passing, although might need to wait til next year to work out they can’t go forward,” Daniel Brettig said.

“Every single comment pointing out it’s a throw. The AFL happy as the ball kept moving and it’s the golden child from the golden team. Sick of it,” wrote another.

https://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/afl-so-in-love-with-dustin-martin-it-forgot-the-rules/news-story/d39fb63806bc797d2176cce2648bb1f0

Legit question though is it a throw? The way I saw it they got hands on the ball at the same time. No different from when it’s a contested ball on the deck and there’s hands all over the place?
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on October 23, 2020, 03:45:05 AM
Quote from: @Holland1Al
Umpiring, Dusty/Cotchin/Lynch/Riewoldt to be allowed to do whatever and it be legal as it’s all part of the AFL agenda to have Richmond win 🤷‍♂️

https://twitter.com/Holland1Al/status/1318835588909256704
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on October 23, 2020, 02:24:15 PM
More media salt from the Purple Parrot:

(https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/attachments/222f433b-c2d0-40de-8e41-996499365c86-png.992435/)

 :propeller :nopity :propeller
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on October 23, 2020, 02:31:41 PM
Fair Dinkum how pathetic

"Look at me look at me" from Damian

Someone tell him it is not about him in any way shape or form. He is irrelevant
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on October 25, 2020, 06:46:37 AM
Collingwood forum

At half-time:

Quote from: Presti35
Go outside in about an hour and you'll hear the sound of a million 2019 premiers stickers being ripped of the back of the car.

And an hour later:

Quote from: What'sinaname
and replaced with 2020 ones?

Quote from: slangman
Considering we were even with Richmond at the start of 2016 is absolutely heartbreaking.
They had a plan that they stuck to whilst we played favourites and
we’re lead by a terrible CEO in Pert who was one of the catalysts for our poor decade.

This tigers premiership really stings. 🤬
Quote from: princem007
Far out 2018 hurts even more now.

I can’t handle the Tiger supporters and have nothing to give them back except the prelim.

I guess we stopped them winning 4 in a row.
Quote from: 90 nice
Done it again some richmond supporter just threw a big brick with go tigers through the glass front door at Olympic park with go tigers on it they shattered the door damaged it too just happened just then in 2017 was a Tyre 2019 a brick 2020 same but 2 bricks were thrown
https://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/viewtopic.php?t=87953&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=135



Geelong forum: (in fairness many Cat fans were quite complementary of us which is unusual).

Quote from: catters_28
I said it in the game day thread but I'll say it again here. This was never going to end well after they said on the grand final brunch that Geelong had a venue booked for a party from midnight to 7am tonight. I mean really that is just arrogance
Quote from: Warhorse
We lost to an average Richmond team. Scott has not learned a thing from any of our previous encounters.

Can we finally send Rohan to the dole queue? inept footballer who's cancerous behavior has damaged relationships within the club.

And **** Cameron. Send that campaigner to the draft. destroyed our chances and distracted the whole club.

Dangerfield. Statistically his 2nd worse game playing for the cats. In a Grand Final. Disgraceful and towelled up by plodders.

Hopeless performance and the team should be embarrassed with themselves
Quote from: spearman
RFC are a champion team, no doubt. Brimming with confidence. Able to turn it up when they need to. Congratulations.
But ****, that is ugly football. Reminds me of teenage soccer and deriding opponents of boot and run. I wonder if there is a fine for picking up the ball in a contest. Someone send a suggestion to the GFC, employ a coach from a soccer club like Newcastle to teach the boys how to slide tackle.
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/geelong-defeated-by-tigers-by-31-points.1250355/


Essendon forum:

Quote from: scotty21
There’s no skill in there gameplan. None at all. Just hack it forward
Quote from: Scintilla
I’ve never in my life seen any team anywhere near as lucky as Richmond with the tap ons, punches, kicks long down the line and general bounce of the ball go their way. I know it’s not all luck, but it’s ridiculous how often it works in their favour.
Quote from: Finding_Nino
Tigers have to be the most arsey team ever to win flags

It’s win the ball at all.costs and scrap it fwd
Quote from: jonovdp
I’ll turn it off before I watch Richmond win
Quote from: Stallion
Worst 3 time premiership era in AFL/VFL history
Quote from: Preliminary_Point2
Worst premiership side I’ve ever seen. They’ve won by default because Geelong couldn’t score in the second half.
Quote from: frosty
I stand by “worst premiership team ever”.

The fact that Trent “cheat” Cotchin is captain makes them the worst, irrespsective of anything else.
Quote from: Kj_11
They are a very good team, but I would put all the recent dynasty teams ahead of them Bris, Geel, Hawks, even our 2000 side is better although didn’t get the job done.

They. Are. Just. Relentless! And nobody to really consistently test them at the right time.
Quote from: efc1robbo
Richmond winning the flag just caps off a terrible year
Quote from: Wanderlust
Richmond win another flag, Cotchin becomes a 3 x premiership captain and Dusty will be a 3 x Norm Smith medalist.

2020 is ■■■■■■■ disgusting.
Quote from: Paul_Peos
Just a reminder, we passed up a future 3 x premiership coach for Matty Knights.

“Nah, we won’t take him now, we’ll wait till he wins flags elsewhere, then we’ll steal all his assistants! It’s genius.”
https://discourse.bomberblitz.com/t/2020-grand-final-richmond-vs-geelong/20275/1741
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on October 25, 2020, 08:49:31 PM
Lol @ the "worst 3 time premiership era in AFL/VFL history"

As if winning three premiership in a short time frame is any way a bad thing. Ugly or pretty it is still 3 premiership.

Little dear didn't think too long in his/her rush to post
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Willy on October 26, 2020, 09:41:06 AM
Sad bitter Essendrug losers.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on October 27, 2020, 04:46:52 AM
Carlton forum:

Quote from: kezza
Time to turn it off.

Not watching these arrogant a***holes win another flag.
Quote from: Arnhem blues

cant watch this any more...going to be insufferable
Quote from: GreatEx
Frustrating that Richmond always seems to run games out 100x better than anyone else. @#$%&! it, I'll tell myself they're on * gear.
Quote from: robertbb
SHAI @#$%&! BOLTON!!!Y**&^#*&*$^*@^%*&#^%*@%*@(*#

@#$%&! @#$%&! @#$%&!

Richmond's first pick in 2016 was pick 29. Compensation for Ty Vickery.

They got Bolton. PICK 29!

We got SPS at 6 and FIsher at 27.

Both are WA boys, as is Bolton.

Someone tell me: WHO IS OUR WA TALENT SCOUT???

SERIOUSLY, WHO IS OUR WA RECRUITER?

SPS and Fisher over Bolton?

I'm switching off before I blow an aneurism.
Quote from: CC1961
And so the tattooed TURD gets another NS.

Wayne Harmes doesn't deserve this.
Quote from: Sydney Blue
Has to be the best group of spuds ever assembled.
How this group has won 3 of the last 4 is beyond comprehension
Quote from: CC1961
How fitting that the covid breaching bastards claim the covid-ridden year.
Quote from: Walsh
They will furl the flag against us again  ::)

This Richmond team is good to watch - their skills are ok, nothing special.. but they really only have one superstar and a bunch of determined gritters that never give up.
Quote from: CC1961
Yeah, and WHY do we have to keep playing the pricks Round 1 EVERY bloody year!!!

:banghead: :banghead: :banghead:

System is rigged.
Quote from: Sydney Blue
Why do teams give Martin so much space. The number of times he is 2 to 3meters in the clear amazes me.
You would just have someone sit on him and bury him every time he touches it.
They don't have a lot of silk the tiges but they just keep running and keep chasing and tackling. The pressure they apply is the best I have ever seen.
There are players who have 3 premiership medals who are average at best but they are determined and just keep at it.
Geelong like GWS last year have class to burn but they didn't have the will the tiges have.
Credit to Hardwick he has brought in that style and it has paid off. Usually guts and determination only gets you so far.

Thats enough now they can make their way back to middle table
Quote from: Adrian Gallagher
You can’t argue against 3 flags in 4 years but I’m convinced they have a handful of spuds in that team. Take out Martin, they lose. Simple.
Quote from: Donstuie
Last night also further highlights to me how overrated Alex Rance was.
http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=37010&start=460
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on October 28, 2020, 02:02:32 PM
Quote from: NeilStewartWC
Hats off to the premiers of the favourable fixture @Richmond_FC. See you in Perth next year (surely?!). #AFLGF
Quote from: NeilStewartWC
Irrelevant to the fact that the reigning premiers benefited from a bigger advantage than any of the 17 other teams in the single most outcome decisive fixturing factor, namely: days rest between games. Truly inexplicable, and undeniable cause for a big fat asterisk.
Quote from: NeilStewartWC
Eagles played Richmond off a FOUR DAY BREAK. For a top four spot. On what planet is that even remotely fair? Travis Auld all but gift wrapped the premiership cup for the Tigers. How they avoided a trip to WA is a mystery for the ages.
Quote from: NeilStewartWC
It’s ridiculous that Auld and the AFL gifted Richmond a >2 day break advantage a competition high five times. They were due to travel to Perth this year but, for some inexplicable reason, didn’t. Hence the asterisk.
https://twitter.com/NeilStewartWC/

Quote from: Discount Dracula
Lynch probably took less cash so he was free to commit dog acts at a protected club
https://twitter.com/NathanhyperBole/status/1320952321791062016

Quote from: Anne Wyllie
So swans take Buddy = trade bans, Richmond keep on recruiting after 3 Premierships = No problems
https://twitter.com/lucky703/status/1320888825590132736
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on November 15, 2020, 07:36:24 PM
Quote from: Rhino
If the pies were tight on the salary cap how the f*** are Richmond not over the salary cap. Oh they are but they get looked after by Gillon

https://twitter.com/rhino1517
Quote from: Mèga
I wouldn’t say Richmond is a dynasty. Not yet at least.

https://twitter.com/Mega21_au/status/1321684458911621121
Quote from: k
Sorry not sorry but literally NO Richmond player except Houli deserves to be named as a 3x premiership player how the f***

https://twitter.com/wckaris/status/1319959233434021890

A blast from the past from Gossage back in July:

Quote from: Tim Gossage
Quote from: Daniel Cherny
Syndesmosis for Prestia and Nankervis, hamstring for Cotchin, broken finger for Lynch
6-8 weeks, 4 weeks and possibly a week for those. It’s over @Richmond_FC but boy you have been great to watch for the last three years.
https://twitter.com/TimGossage/status/1279703128133132288
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on November 24, 2020, 02:47:48 PM
Quote from: espionage queen
when are richmond supporters gonna realise that no one outside of their own fanbase likes richmond? i guarantee at least 99% of afl fans (bar richmond supporters) have them in their top 3 most disliked teams
https://twitter.com/rebeccaawce/status/1330709715827888128
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on November 24, 2020, 09:13:34 PM
Quote from: espionage queen
when are richmond supporters gonna realise that no one outside of their own fanbase likes richmond? i guarantee at least 99% of afl fans (bar richmond supporters) have them in their top 3 most disliked teams
https://twitter.com/rebeccaawce/status/1330709715827888128

We are fully back baby   :dancing :dancing
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on November 24, 2020, 09:22:10 PM
Comin' for the filth's hate crown... :clapping :gotigers :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on November 24, 2020, 10:43:24 PM
Quote from: espionage queen
when are richmond supporters gonna realise that no one outside of their own fanbase likes richmond? i guarantee at least 99% of afl fans (bar richmond supporters) have them in their top 3 most disliked teams
https://twitter.com/rebeccaawce/status/1330709715827888128

I feel like he's putting maple syrup on my pancakes
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on November 28, 2020, 03:15:31 PM
Quote from: 🔴 Stevo⚫
Quote from: simonsays
My account was shut down 3 weeks ago for calling Dylan grimes a diver l HHaha the Richmond nuffies reporter me and I havnt be able to get it back
Richmond fans are x100 worse than fekking Carlton , take out dusty for a season they would finish in the bottom half of the ladder
https://twitter.com/BoagsBomber74/status/1304194339136888834
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on November 30, 2020, 09:00:23 AM
The part "the Richmond nuffies reporter me" says it all
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on November 30, 2020, 01:45:22 PM
Quote from: #since1969ShaneEmms
@AFL Rookie System is a farce - just allowing rich clubs to supplementary pay players off the senior list - Ben Miller promoted off it this week but Sydney Stack, Marlion Pickett, Jake Aarts and Mabior Chol are still on @Richmond_FC  Rookie List...it abuses the system
https://twitter.com/_Since1969/status/1332451810808774656




Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on November 30, 2020, 08:01:17 PM
How are we able to supp their payments? It's all in the TPP isn't it?
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on December 03, 2020, 02:36:56 PM
Carlton fan:
Quote from: Blues90
Took you 40 years to in how many flags we won just in the 80s 4 great seasons in 40 years

Eagles supporters:
Quote from: CM9000
I ask because the record shows that the Gabba is basically your home away from home, so it‘s blatantly rubbish to say that the ground and travel doesn’t factor in at all. Would Richmond have won the GF against us in Perth? What about against Geelong at Simonds Stadium? Arguably your greatest win this year was against Port at Adelaide Oval, but, considering they’re the biggest chokers of all time, I found that result hardly surprising.
Quote from: HAPPY BUDDHA
Richmond can’t do squat away from the MCG and they know it. If they had met anyone other than Geelong in the GF this year then I reckon a few of their older boys would be looking at the Rance retirement option.
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/if-7-straight-games-at-the-mcg-leading-into-finals-is-an-advantage.1250868/post-68156493
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tiger Khosh on December 04, 2020, 12:45:19 AM
Carlton fan:
Quote from: Blues90
Took you 40 years to in how many flags we won just in the 80s 4 great seasons in 40 years

Eagles supporters:
Quote from: CM9000
I ask because the record shows that the Gabba is basically your home away from home, so it‘s blatantly rubbish to say that the ground and travel doesn’t factor in at all. Would Richmond have won the GF against us in Perth? What about against Geelong at Simonds Stadium? Arguably your greatest win this year was against Port at Adelaide Oval, but, considering they’re the biggest chokers of all time, I found that result hardly surprising.
Quote from: HAPPY BUDDHA
Richmond can’t do squat away from the MCG and they know it. If they had met anyone other than Geelong in the GF this year then I reckon a few of their older boys would be looking at the Rance retirement option.
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/if-7-straight-games-at-the-mcg-leading-into-finals-is-an-advantage.1250868/post-68156493

So many stupid takes here.

1. We won 3 flags in 4 years. Carlton won 3 in 7 years. So why are they shortening the time period to it took them to win 3 flags to the time between their first and last but for us they are for some reason extending it all the way back to 1980  :huh also it’s been 25 years since their last flag and they won that by cheating the salary cap. I really don’t get their angle here.

2. West Coast would need to qualify for a grand final before we can worry about playing them over there. Pretty sure the pies beat them over there even while being locked in a hotel for the week leading up. Pies then smashed by the cats who we beat in the granny.......

3. Does he mean how in last years finals run we beat Brisbane in Brisbane or how this year we beat the saints at a neutral venue in the Gold Coast then beat the top team all season at their home ground in Adelaide before beating the cats at a beautiful venue in Brisbane  :huh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on December 04, 2020, 01:58:50 PM
Another Eagles supporter:
Quote from: bzparkes
If Richmond ever got a fixture befitting a reigning premier then they wouldn't even make the top 4, instead they get gifted a draw that mid-placed teams get.

You can Richmond out of ninth but the AFL fixturing people seem to still think Premiershipmond is still a thing...
Quote from: bzparkes
Well the fact that you got the 7th hardest draw out of any team before COVID heat.

Weak as pee and puts the 'Fix' in fixturing.

Obvious to everyone other than tigger fans it seems.
Quote from: bzparkes
Play us in Perth like you were supposed to and you don't make the top 4. Simple.

Port fan:
Quote from: simba_ said
this season was more fixed than ever, every game was played out like a theatrical production. taking it seriously and trying to use statistics to prove something from last year wrong is obscene.
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/if-7-straight-games-at-the-mcg-leading-into-finals-is-an-advantage.1250868/page-12
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tiger Khosh on December 04, 2020, 05:02:14 PM
Geez eagles supporters are an entitled bunch arnt they.....
The most even fixtured season in history and they still complain. Every team played each other once. Interstate teams got to play at their home grounds whereas vic teams didn’t do so after round 5 or whenever it was and they still complain. Add to that the grand final was played in Brisbane and 2 vic teams still made it and it’s just laughable at this point.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: georgies31 on December 04, 2020, 05:23:06 PM
2 years in row eagles choked top 4 opportunities lol and got done by dons and pies at home that's there real issue.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on December 05, 2020, 12:27:03 PM
And yet another whining Eagles supporter (and this was posted yesterday - a whole year after the 2019 GF btw lol)
Quote from: Balboa
2 months at home at the end of 2019 was an embarrassment to the AFL and the GF is tainted
https://twitter.com/greedymessenger/status/1334770441223692288


Swans fan's view of Hardwick.
Quote from: Anne Wyllie
He has a case of FIGJAM now. What a precious whinger.
https://twitter.com/lucky703/status/1334797418366320640
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on December 07, 2020, 01:50:03 PM
Quote from: Cameron S
I can’t wait till this afl fixture comes out. You wait , Richmond draw be so beneficial to them. Always is.  Ha
https://twitter.com/rangey77/status/1335713791284166656

Quote from: Dark Eagle
In 2019 Tigers interstate games should have been split up more evenly, you were a killa team of the previous 2 years. & God all mighty you should have played WC twice, the 2018 premiers, once in Perth (farkin come on!). You only barely had our measure twice at the MCG in 17 & 19, & got your pants pulled down in Perth in 18 (Dusty fend offs put to shame by Yeo).

Tigers are slick but not that great. I'll take being there to see Dom Sheeds immortal technique forever iconic best & most important goal ever over your 17 & 19 snorefests. 2020..... Meh Corona Wars lol
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/if-7-straight-games-at-the-mcg-leading-into-finals-is-an-advantage.1250868/post-68192417

Quote from: Mr Miyagi
WTF, they’ve won three flags in four years and the government budget is gifting them tens of millions. FFS!!! 😤
https://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/viewtopic.php?t=88140
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on December 08, 2020, 03:04:44 PM
Quote from: Dark Eagle 9
The best team of the previous 2 years gets to play 7 games at home before finals. Dont all vic teams play around 6 away games now? Come on mang honestly why didnt you guys play us in Perth that year? WC supporters go on about it because of the significance of that game & how important it is for eagles to finish top 2. The next week against the Hawks we were spent. I mentioned 17 because we were so disadvantaged in stock at tje time. 17 Tigers lost to a bumch of teams, MCG factpr just helped that much for a team improving with a mad legion of success starved Tigger fans lol. Regardless..... Immortal Technique Sheed Best Grand Final Goal will be remembered more than your itchy scrot grand final wins v crows & giants bish
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/if-7-straight-games-at-the-mcg-leading-into-finals-is-an-advantage.1250868/post-68203836
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on December 21, 2020, 05:02:30 PM
Quote from: Neil Stewart
The behavior and conduct of @Richmond_FC players is surely an increasing concern for the @AFL.

Success on-field, but things seem to be pretty shambolic off-field.
https://twitter.com/NeilStewartWC

Quote from: Robert Rich
The club has brought the game into disrepute. Breaching quarantine, meeting with shady gambling figures. Penalise the 19 and 20 premierships. Give them to the opposition team...watch the tiggys get triggered
https://twitter.com/RobRich34

Quote from: Lachy Black
Poor culture at the Tigs.
https://twitter.com/fluffblack


Quote from: ThePop
It can't be the Tigers as theirs isn't a Dynasty, although the media will try to tell us it is....It has to Lions
https://twitter.com/superfooty/status/1340779302149783552


Quote from: Rob
I’m struggling to answer this but why does Richmond and Carlton have some god given right to have the prime time first match of the AFL season? What makes them so special over the other 16 teams? Why isn’t it rotated? This is rubbish.
https://twitter.com/Rob62263

Quote from: Jimbo
Quote from: Nic Negrepontis
The gate is split evenly so dunno if it matters too much. And I guess no one was allowed in last year.

And they’re gonna unfurl 2 flags 😶

This is one where I will risk turning up late to not be there for the 2 flags unfurling
https://twitter.com/jimmybo50/status/1340404045446443008
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on December 23, 2020, 07:48:28 PM
Quote from: Andrew Ivezic
Richmond has beaten GWS and Adelaide to win their flags (hardly superpowers)...as well as wining this year's practice match tournament.

Brisbane and Hawthorn beat defending premiers, whilst Geelong beat elite Melbourne based teams in St.Kilda and Geelong.
https://twitter.com/Andrew_Ivezic
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: wayne on December 23, 2020, 09:46:15 PM
Quote from: Andrew Ivezic
Richmond has beaten GWS and Adelaide to win their flags (hardly superpowers)...as well as wining this year's practice match tournament.

Brisbane and Hawthorn beat defending premiers, whilst Geelong beat elite Melbourne based teams in St.Kilda and Geelong.
https://twitter.com/Andrew_Ivezic

Beating the Bombers, I'll give the Lions that one, but Collingwood were absolutely rubbish sides.

Betheras, L. Davis, Lonie, McKee, Freeborn, Molloy, Steinfort, J. Cloke, Cole, Fraser, Holland, Kinnear, Lokan, Walker, Woewodin... amazing they made finals, let alone a grand final.

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Hard Roar Tiger on December 24, 2020, 08:07:07 AM
Crows beat Cats by 11 goals in the prelim and were $1.60 faves going into the 2017 GF
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: camboon on December 24, 2020, 03:10:33 PM
Oh well, we will just have to win another 3 to make all the good people happy
Merry Christmas
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on January 02, 2021, 12:59:57 PM
Quote from: Thatsashame
If it didn’t rain last year the Tigers wouldn’t have beaten Port or Geelong. In fact they struggled mostly against the Saints who had half their team out.
https://www.theroar.com.au/2021/01/02/my-predictions-for-the-2021-afl-season/

Quote from: Todd Davey
Quote from: The Tail
Port had no excuse in last yrs prelim & there's still no explanation for that 1...
No excuses... just the worst deliberate call of all time
https://twitter.com/ToddJDavey/status/1344916127210639362

Quote from: Jacqui
How many times did Richmond leave Queensland last season champ?
https://twitter.com/doddsie161/status/1344911477992394752
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: wayne on January 02, 2021, 06:25:26 PM
Barrett has put up his 30 best finals moments of the modern era...

Pickett pirouette is #29

That's it. No Dusty winning a 3rd Normie, but there is Burgoyne kicking a goal...
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Damo on January 02, 2021, 06:49:07 PM
Love Burgoyne .. silk deserves all accolades and some
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: WilliamPowell on January 02, 2021, 09:41:43 PM
Love Burgoyne .. silk deserves all accolades and some

 :clapping

Agree one of the best players of the last 15 years. Under-rated IMHO

Absolute jet
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on January 08, 2021, 02:33:08 PM
AFL   
It’s never too late to start… What are your New Year’s resolutions for your club? 🤔

‌‌Shaun Hennessy
For Adelaide crows to be premiers in 2021 and port to win the wooden spoon in 2021 and Richmond tigers to finish at 16th place on the afl ladder in 2021

Anton Howard
Richmond will get the wooden spoon 🥄

Damian Burton
To finally attend a winning game against Richmond

Natasha Ann Wilson
To get to go to all home games and for the Eagles to knock Richmond off its perch.

Tyler Vandermeer
The Cats to get revenge on the Tigers in the granny this year, premership would be nice. Go the Catters

Hayley Lim
geelong to get a home final, again might be waiting for a decade for that one

Kevin Hay
Sack the great pretender Chris Scott. His stupidity gave Richmond the GF. They would probably have won anyway, buy Chrissy boy, destroyed the contest through his stupidity.

https://www.facebook.com/AFL/posts/10157872496916417
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on January 10, 2021, 07:11:27 PM
Quote from: Darren Symes
Clear culture problem at Richmond plain to see last year and continuing and it starts at the top
Quote from: Sausages
Their last chance for a 3 peat is this year. But they won't do it. Not tuff enough.
Quote from: Warwick Taylor
It must kill all tigers supporters that @masonsixtencox is the reason they didn’t win 4 in a row! Thanks mason!
Quote from: blues19951999
Pls stop man. You can’t deny that they’re ageing lmao dusty lynch Prestia cotchin houli edwards grimes astbury lynch lambert Riewoldt will alll be 29+.. that’s literally there best 11 players
Quote from: Coolest Fox
The more they write off Richmond the better they seem to get, to be fair without Dusty they are an average top 5 team, the reflection is on the caliber of Dustin Martin who is just top shelf in the big games, no accident the Tigers lost the Prelim in 2018 with an unfit Martin
https://twitter.com/superfooty/status/1348067917485600770
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on January 11, 2021, 11:39:46 AM
Herald Sun Sport
Richmond will have 5 players aged 30 or older for season 2021.
How much longer can this golden era continue?

Ivan Gagarin
dont worry they get 20 home games a year to compensate

https://www.facebook.com/HeraldSunSport/posts/4970914486314970

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on January 11, 2021, 03:37:13 PM
Quote from: Melcatzzzz
So far Jack has stood by an adulterer and someone who’s breached a couple of times now.... 🤔
https://twitter.com/Melcatzzzz/status/1348426616905469952

Quote from: Melissa Edwards
I heard on the radio this morning the announcer say “in other news reigning premiers Richmond are back at training today” 🙄 glad I got that breaking update!!
Quote from: Brooke H
Wow! A player returning from their off season like every other player. Big if true.
Quote from: Craig
Dusty runs now, interesting.
Quote from: mathew
Wow groundbreaking news
Quote from: Footy Fan
I call bulls---. There is no way he is even in the top 10. Wouldn’t have run since the grand final
https://twitter.com/TomBrowne7/status/1348403228514295810
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on January 13, 2021, 02:25:41 AM
Dion
Pfffftt, Richmonds defence...one player walks his opponent under the ball careful not to grab or make it look like in the back, then the 3rd up tiger takes a chest mark behind. They do it well but I hope the other teams will one day catch on.

Jeanette
@Di It's because the Tigers' supporters who comment on here are so cocky and unattractive. You reap what you sow...

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/expert-opinion/mick-mcguane/afl-list-analysis-mick-mcguane-rates-every-afl-teams-defence-from-118/news-story/4ca97e84f01d29affe4e04f630cab926



Quote from: JoshKangaroo
Worst fans in the comp?

Richmond fans
Tiges fans
Yellow and black w....s
The flogs from Punt Rd
https://twitter.com/JoshLFC19/status/1348885429471232003
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on January 13, 2021, 03:13:43 PM
SEN: What are Richmond's 2021 resolutions?

Quote from: Bill Inkle
Becoming irrelevant again so others can have some joy. Stop being greedy
Quote from: Chewy Bravo
Not being sexual deviants
https://twitter.com/1116sen/status/1349129530405912578
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on January 15, 2021, 04:07:18 AM
Quote from: MP Harro Pear
F*** what are you 12? Geelong have been a much better side the past 15 years. Not even a comparison

You were s*** for 37 years . Geelong have been good every year since 2002
https://twitter.com/geelongaddy/status/1349601913130549250
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on January 17, 2021, 01:24:00 PM

dmw_asia
Probably get down voted here, but Richmond is looking shaky past 2021. Other than Martin the rest of the "stars" are 30+ and starting to struggle with form and/or injuries (Cotchin hamstrings, Houli calves, Reiwoldt form and knees)

popcockery
Yeah I'll pay that. Please get s*** soon though, I miss it

Jack-Schulz
Pretty sure brisbane figured them out in that qualifier

https://www.reddit.com/r/AFL/comments/ky6m9h/which_teams_are_flag_or_bust_right_now/

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: georgies31 on January 17, 2021, 05:08:34 PM
Loool with 3 flags in the bank bunch of clowns.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on January 17, 2021, 07:42:20 PM

dmw_asia
Probably get down voted here, but Richmond is looking shaky past 2021. Other than Martin the rest of the "stars" are 30+ and starting to struggle with form and/or injuries (Cotchin hamstrings, Houli calves, Reiwoldt form and knees)

popcockery
Yeah I'll pay that. Please get s*** soon though, I miss it

Jack-Schulz
Pretty sure brisbane figured them out in that qualifier

https://www.reddit.com/r/AFL/comments/ky6m9h/which_teams_are_flag_or_bust_right_now/



Haha

Brisbane played their grand final in the qualifier
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: lamington on January 17, 2021, 08:38:16 PM
If by figured out they mean our boys were silly and played the get in f50 fast with no lynch then yeah we got figured out
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on January 18, 2021, 02:53:16 AM
Scraping the barrel of humanity quoting reddit..... :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 01, 2021, 06:21:06 AM
Quote from: Matthew C-J
never would’ve guessed Richmond and collingwood get a Friday night game 10 minutes down the road!
https://twitter.com/AFL_House/status/1355661252027015169

Quote from: Bill Inkle
What a surprise AFL pets Richmond and Collingwood don't have to travel
https://twitter.com/AFL/status/1355689757112737796

Quote from: Neil Stewart
ANOTHER @Richmond_FCoff-field indiscretion. Wake up @afl, this is now beyond a joke.

Time to hold @brendongale25 to account and see that action is taken to correct the disgusting culture that has set in during his tenure.
https://twitter.com/NeilStewartWC/status/1355861566684467202
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: julzqld on February 01, 2021, 04:32:57 PM
Quote from: Matthew C-J
never would’ve guessed Richmond and collingwood get a Friday night game 10 minutes down the road!
https://twitter.com/AFL_House/status/1355661252027015169

Quote from: Bill Inkle
What a surprise AFL pets Richmond and Collingwood don't have to travel
https://twitter.com/AFL/status/1355689757112737796

Quote from: Neil Stewart
ANOTHER @Richmond_FCoff-field indiscretion. Wake up @afl, this is now beyond a joke.

Time to hold @brendongale25 to account and see that action is taken to correct the disgusting culture that has set in during his tenure.
https://twitter.com/NeilStewartWC/status/1355861566684467202
I hope these people aren’t allowed to breed
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 03, 2021, 04:07:39 PM
Eagles fan:

Quote from: Brunswick Trap King
To be fair, we all laughed at Richmond when they suggested that was an aim a few years back yet here we are. If a team like Richmond can do it, surely a bigger club like Carlton can.
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/carlton-football-club-debt-free-and-record-membership.1254155/post-68660322
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 05, 2021, 03:52:24 PM
On SEN today.

Cats caller: "I'd rather follow a club that won 70% of its games and didn't win a premiership [over the past decade] than a club that only won 50% of the time and pinched a premiership".

Cats fan's txt: "Geelong was the best team last year. Richmond was only the best in the second half of the Grand Final".

Another caller: "I see the problem with Geelong is they are team with too many gun players. You look at Richmond and they have role players.". 

Russell: "Geelong was beaten by some Dustin Martin magic."

Tigers fan's txt: "Dwayne, Geelong was beaten by the whole Richmond team not just Dusty".

Russell (30 mins later): "Geelong got close last year until some freakish magic from Dusty".

Russell to Cam Guthrie: "I'd expect you'd be expecting to improve on last year which would mean winning the flag."
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 06, 2021, 03:06:19 PM
Super teams like the Hawthorn of the ’80s, North Melbourne and West Coast, Brisbane in the early 2000s, Geelong and even Hawthorn from 2011-2015 were outstanding.

With no disrespect to Richmond, their successful period has been more of a testament to the system and style first, talent second. Not that there’s no talent there, but does anyone really think they’d stand up to those super teams?

https://www.theroar.com.au/2021/02/06/the-scary-stat-behind-the-demise-of-high-scoring-in-the-afl/
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: lamington on February 07, 2021, 12:55:41 AM
People acting like the Brisbane team from 3 peat was 22x AA players. They had role players too! Namely the Scott brothers.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tiger Khosh on February 08, 2021, 12:44:39 AM
People acting like the Brisbane team from 3 peat was 22x AA players. They had role players too! Namely the Scott brothers.

Still the most talented side I’ve ever seen assembled. Although as an expansion team they had draft and salary cap enhancements that helped them with that.

The hawks three peat team is the one I don’t buy into. That team was no more talented their our own and they won their 3peat while the league was expanding and all the top draft picks were going to the suns and giants. So essentially the top teams stayed top while the bottom teams took longer to rebuild with all the top talent going to the expansion teams.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 09, 2021, 02:02:36 PM
Replies to the Age article about us looking to sign Hardwick to a new contract:

Quote from: Neil Stewart
Proof that Richmond have no intent on cleaning up their culture.
Quote from: Greg
Reiwoldt will retire so there's 1 idiot gone. 3 others may retire to
Quote from: Neil Stewart
Proof that Richmond have no intent on cleaning up their culture.
https://twitter.com/NeilStewartWC/status/1358704568079552512
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: wayne on February 09, 2021, 02:53:06 PM
Has anyone read the Saints nuffies page on facebook? I think it's called Trade Rumours, News etc.

He did Richmonds rankings, gave Dusty a 9.5, Dion a 10 and Rioli a -1, then he has ranked the Saints and 50% got 10's  :snidegrin Membrey, Crouch, Butler, Marshall, Ryder, Gresham, Billings... the list goes on  :snidegrin
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: georgies31 on February 09, 2021, 09:48:32 PM
Has anyone read the Saints nuffies page on facebook? I think it's called Trade Rumours, News etc.

He did Richmonds rankings, gave Dusty a 9.5, Dion a 10 and Rioli a -1, then he has ranked the Saints and 50% got 10's  :snidegrin Membrey, Crouch, Butler, Marshall, Ryder, Gresham, Billings... the list goes on  :snidegrin

Saints a irrelevant club believe there own hype and Ratten topping up with alot of has beens and rejects.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 11, 2021, 12:57:31 PM
Quote from: RampagingReigner
Your richmond team still doesnt touch the North team of the 90’s. Your three flags were handouts from the AFL and flukes.
Geelong away at home
Short season asterisks flag 2020
And lucked out against GWS as geelong played a home final at the G against collingwood.
https://twitter.com/DragonVladko/status/1359435945934639106



Quote from: ApplecrossWC
Even now that Richmond are winning flags their fans still post embarrassing stuff like this looking for attention.

Oooh love me... pathetic.
Quote from: mcgarnacle
Richmond fans have got to make the most out of this dynasty. Another >30 yr drought could be just around the corner.
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/richmond-the-afls-biggest-merchandise-seller-again-congratulations-champs.1254436/post-68707120
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 14, 2021, 03:11:33 AM
Quote from: Balboa
I used to like barty, then i found out who she barracked for
Quote from: Jane Angel
(https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f602.png) me too
https://twitter.com/greedymessenger/status/1360556447038283780

Quote from: cllipman
7richmond
Quote from: dannysuka
Free kick Richmond
Quote from: bowser9
Is ash team Trent or team Dimma?
Quote from: dante_cicchiello
Tigers (https://emojipedia-us.s3.dualstack.us-west-1.amazonaws.com/thumbs/120/apple/271/nauseated-face_1f922.png) Barty u can do better then that
https://www.instagram.com/p/CLOqfIal4cj/
https://www.instagram.com/7afl/
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 14, 2021, 09:30:52 PM
Quote from: windyhill
Essendon did more to save Richmond than 95% of its fans. Tragic.

Quote from: Mitchell Madness
One thing I've always noticed, Richmond supporters always have had more modern jumpers than other clubs fans

Quote from: Evolved1
It was a regrettable short period of poor governance in the time of a club with a long and proud history. Richmond, of all clubs, should have been grateful to have benefited through being gifted an easy finals game against the underachieving Carlton side of that year.

Unfortunately you weren't able to capitalise on the opportunity. It's highly likely you would have lost by double that margin against the strong Essendon side of that year who would have more than likely gone on to win the premiership and thus benefited from merchandise sales in a similar manner to what Richmond is doing now.

Anyway, I'm glad to see Richmond fans living it up after decades of underachievement. Even moreso, it's nice to see an Essendon legend holding the wheel during your successful era.

Quote from: Lavender Bushranger
Doesn't this [merchandise sales] reflect on the type of person that supports Richmond?

I mean, let's be honest. Only a certain type of person wears merch.

Quote from: Lip Gallagher
Have to get in quick for Tiger success, once in a life time stuff.
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/richmond-the-afls-biggest-merchandise-seller-again-congratulations-champs.1254436/page-6

Quote from: Mockful
everything is about richmond with fox and the afl page
https://twitter.com/Mxckful/status/1360694556329529345
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on February 15, 2021, 09:18:55 AM
Evolved1 has evolved too far and has forgotten history. Sheedy.

At least Sheedy played out his career at Richmond and was not forced out like Hardwick was.

And Sheedy is in our Hall of Fame and Hardwick will be at some point. Crickets at Windy Hill
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on February 15, 2021, 09:22:53 AM
Evolved1 has evolved too far and has forgotten history. Sheedy.

At least Sheedy played out his career at Richmond and was not forced out like Hardwick was.

And Sheedy is in our Hall of Fame and Hardwick will be at some point. Crickets at Windy Hill

Yeah 'Essendon legend' is a bit of a stretch. Considerably worse than Collingwood's claim to a preliminaryship in 2018 like it counts for something.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 16, 2021, 02:14:55 PM
Quote from: Vardy Magic
Hey @Adelaide_FC, I've just seen the AFL Amazon documentary trailer featuring Rory Sloane among others, and was wondering if it's possible to organise an edited version with all of the Richmond bits cut out? Still too triggering for my liking. Thanks.
Quote from: TracksuitBandit119
Can’t watch anything to do with that gf

PTSD kicks in
Quote from: Jarrod Case
I’ve barely watched it once and I was there.
https://twitter.com/VardyMagic/status/1361119087393300482

Quote from: LS Fish
Back when the tigers couldn’t even beat a team that didn’t make the finals. As a Melbourne fan with Richmond supporting family, I miss these days.
https://twitter.com/LS__Fish/status/1360916735159795713
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Willy on February 16, 2021, 03:58:27 PM
Quote from: Vardy Magic
Hey @Adelaide_FC, I've just seen the AFL Amazon documentary trailer featuring Rory Sloane among others, and was wondering if it's possible to organise an edited version with all of the Richmond bits cut out? Still too triggering for my liking. Thanks.
Quote from: TracksuitBandit119
Can’t watch anything to do with that gf

PTSD kicks in
Quote from: Jarrod Case
I’ve barely watched it once and I was there.
https://twitter.com/VardyMagic/status/1361119087393300482

Quote from: LS Fish
Back when the tigers couldn’t even beat a team that didn’t make the finals. As a Melbourne fan with Richmond supporting family, I miss these days.
https://twitter.com/LS__Fish/status/1360916735159795713

TBF the first tweet is pretty funny  :lol
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 18, 2021, 04:16:30 PM
Demon supporter responding to Mansell training with us:


Quote from: spirit of norm smith
FFS. After three premierships in the last 4 years, I’ve grown to really hate the Tigers.  I hate every other club, just some like the Pies, Eagles, Bombers and now Tigers are really hated.  😡
 
Mansell is a skilled, fast, wing/half back runner who showed in the SANFL that he also has the 2nd efforts and intensity to be in the AFL system. It’d be great for Mark Williams or Tim Lamb to get his number and give him a call to see if he would consider a spot with the Dees. Tigers already have too many good players. They need to opt out for a while. 
https://demonland.com/forums/topic/49376-rhyan-mansell/#comments
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 18, 2021, 08:24:01 PM
Quote from: Brettforecast1
Im sure if he was a "gem" other clubs would have signed him. Get off Richmond's ****
https://twitter.com/brettforecast1/status/1362284292387168260
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 19, 2021, 05:50:14 PM
Q. Has an AFL decision/policy ever cost your club a potential flag?
Quote from: 1990crow
Trent Cotchin not getting banned for bump on Dylan Shiels head in 2017 prelim

Because the head is protected in the modern AFL. Cotchin chose to enter Shiels headspace to attack the ball.
The same action and result every other time to this incident has resulted in a suspension. Because Richmond was in the grand final for the first time in decades the AFL let it slide.
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/has-an-afl-decision-policy-ever-cost-your-club-a-potential-flag.1254697/page-7

------------------------------------------

Quote from: Obeanie1
So up to 2017 Tigers were playing and losing to Geelong in Geelong. And then the Tigers started winning these Geelong 'home game's when played at the MCG.

What a fortunate change in fixturing.

Almost as if Geelong are more familiar and confident playing in Geelong v Richmond. Massive benefit to the opposition giving up home ground advantage to play where the Tigers are very comfortable v playing somewhere they rarely win.

Tough away game that Geelong trip.

Some teams just get a leg up from AFL fixturing and avoid playing in Geelong. Lucky Tigers. Just like being gifted an early kill against Carlton when they were rebuilding.

Quote from: bh90210fan
Great to see a WC thread on the Mb for all the Richmond supporters to continue their obsession with us. You guys really are a weird bunch.
As far as advantages goes, having 10 games at Optus against traveling sides might help us limp into the 8, but that is pretty useless when you have to win multiple finals on the road from there to win a flag. If we don’t finish top 2 we’re cooked. And you need to overcome a hell of a lot of disadvantage and win on the road to finish top two when you’re not based in Victoria.
The most advantaged teams are the ones which get gifted home finals regardless of ladder position. The mcg tenants.

Quote from: obeanie1
Typical stupid reply from a Richmond nuff nuff..

Totally avoided the issue......And the obvious.

Only time will tell if Richmond are good enough to win in a Perth hub v Eagles.

To date Tigers have played once there in three seasons. A 47 point thumping.

Finally in 2021 Richmond have a challenging draw worthy of being the premier team. Multiple interstate trips and no super soft run at home leading into finals. If they win this season I will 'tip my hat'.

Quote from: Obeanie1
You forgot to mention the undisputed advantages of being an AFL pet.

Avoiding playing in Geelong again. The current toughest away venue in the comp instead played at your home ground. Massive advantage over other top four teams who pay Geelong in Geelong.

No trips to Tasmania. Let others do the extra travel.

Eagles fans accept they need to travel. It's a given challenge we know can't be avoided.

We don't accept pampered fixturing that gives the best team for the past 3-4 years a soft draw.

Not hard to understand but Tiger fans don't handle facts and basic logic. Easier to just ignore it totally hey Tigers!
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/west-coast-eagles-2021.1252212/page-23#post-68610597

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tiger Khosh on February 20, 2021, 03:29:34 AM
Ahhhhh the old Geelong home ground advantage. Played one final there against freo and lost. Can’t remember the previous one to that.

Fact of the matter is Geelong don’t play all their home games at home and don’t play any of their finals at home. It isn’t a Richmond thing, it’s league wide. Didn’t hear them complain about this when they were winning flags....

Besides 2020 grand final played on neutral venue and who won???
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on February 20, 2021, 08:31:56 AM
We played 4 finals out of Victoria last year and still won the flag.

Those Eagle fans also ignore they've choked at home the past two years against Hawthorn (r23, 2019) and Collingwood (EF, 2020).
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on February 20, 2021, 12:09:16 PM
Geelong flogs calling us AFL pets while one of their former players heads an AFL committee that's been changing the rules every year since we won our first flag in order to nullify our game plan and benefit theirs...... :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tiger Khosh on February 20, 2021, 03:19:29 PM
I actually agree they should play all their home games in Geelong but yeah that’s an issue to take up with the AFL not us.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on February 20, 2021, 09:21:07 PM
Chuckling @ the "tough away game that Geelong trip"

Would have thought, given all the whining about Richmond at MCG, that the toughest away trip would be playing us @ MCG
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: MintOnLamb on February 20, 2021, 10:53:44 PM
They will have to play the GF at the MCG if the whining biatches ever get there, so they should embrace the experience....
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 20, 2021, 11:35:15 PM
Quote from: Obeanie1
You need to come up with something more substantial than that tripe.

Remind me again what question has not been answered?

Victim narrative and entitlement to success? WTF are you on?

The narrative is about equalisation for all teams. Not just West Coast. It means that pampered teams such as Richmond over the past 4 years stop getting hand outs to the detriment of other sides.

It means Richmond goes and plays Geelong in Geelong, the most difficult away game in the league by far.

It means Richmond do not get a nice soft fixture leading into finals travelling once in two months while other contenders travel multiple times.

Not hard to comprehend if you open both eyes.

Richmond get forced to play home games away from home? What in 2020 when everyone was forced to do that? Now that is just a dumb argument in itself.

Please explain all these advantages West Coast get over Vic teams. The only one I can think of is they don't share home ground advantage with multiple clubs, thats it. The AFL simply can't change that where as they can address a number of 'benefits' they gift the Tigers in fixturing. Something they actually finally did with the 2021 draw should it remain as published but not as far as they can. (Still no trip to Geelong or Tassie)

Now trot off and do some more homework because the above you submitted is a F-.

Quote from: DanWA
7 games at optus stadium in a row leading in the finals would be nice

Much like the 2019 gift the premiers got
Quote from: DanWA
2018 really put a dent in the "dynasty"
Quote from: Coaster2012
Still can't beat us in Perth.
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/west-coast-eagles-2021.1252212/page-26
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 21, 2021, 05:12:48 PM
Quote from: RUNVS
In a century from now people will still be talking about Buddy, while Martin will have long since been forgotten about.
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/martin-going-to-the-swans.1255358/post-68824282


Quote from: Obeanie1
Away all year?

4 of the first 5 games were at the MCG then one at Marvel. Thats close to the first 3rd of the season btw.

Yet again Tigers ignoring basic history.

Nice comfortable start whilst WA and SA clubs forced to hub with no covid in either state. Massive mental boost for some teams, massive dissadvantage to others.

Some side start the season off at home and get their confidence up, others forced to carry the travel load.......again.

Thems the facts buddy.

Quote from: catscollector
Hardly hardest flag ever.
Shortened quarters made it less taxing on older players.
Only 17 games played per team for the season. lol, that's a full month less of footy!

I loved the AFL narrative though. Talk of being the most deserved flag and all but seriously, get us back to full 20 minute quarters and 22 rounds per season thanks.
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/west-coast-eagles-2021.1252212/page-28
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 22, 2021, 03:41:58 AM
Quote from: Markus
Ahhh, the joys of running around, high 5ing each other about who is the strongest club, with all these great members. Now you’ll start to eat each other & their cubs. 😂😂😂 And remember.....All the Norf supporters will get in to their games Oh the irony 🦘
https://twitter.com/WoolyTri/status/1363201651708813313
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 22, 2021, 03:34:42 PM
Quote from: RUNVS
Norm Smith's are pretty easy to get when your team makes the Grand Final a few times and you are undoubtedly the best player of that team. Sort of like Melbourne of yesteryear and Nathan Jones.

Plus none of the Richmond Grand Finals were close. Had Martin not played they still would have won. The best Norm Smith's are the ones where the player turns the tide for his team.
Quote from: Chuckie357
The media obsession with this guy is disgraceful. Wouldn’t have half the medals he has if they didn’t fawn over him like they do. If he was going he would’ve gone when he re-signed
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/martin-going-to-the-swans.1255358/page-3#post-68829926


Quote from: DanWA
I understand why Richmond fans will never agree

You would never see a scheduled 7 in a row at our home ground

The VFL would simply not allow such a thing to influence a non Victorian team
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/west-coast-eagles-2021.1252212/page-29
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on February 23, 2021, 06:52:02 AM
What the hell RUNVS.

Comparing Nathan Jones to Dusty and suggesting Dusty didn't turn the tide in the last premiership? That's 100% what he did!
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on February 23, 2021, 11:19:49 AM
People still talk about the four blokes who won three Brownlows and they played in what was only a state league there's barely any footage of most of them, hardly any  of it's in colour. and Bobby Skilton, the one they probably still talk about the most only played in one final right at the end of his career....but yeah the only bloke to win three Norm Smiths playing in a national comp and whose entire career's been televised  in high definition with multiple cameras will be forgotten... :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 24, 2021, 05:25:31 AM
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/richmond-supporters-are-unbearable-flogs-thankfully-it-will-be-all-over-soon.1255183/

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: cub on February 24, 2021, 09:20:11 AM
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/richmond-supporters-are-unbearable-flogs-thankfully-it-will-be-all-over-soon.1255183/
Love Bigsalty um oh I mean Bigfooty  :rollin
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 24, 2021, 03:11:37 PM
Quote from: Neil Stewart
Thankfully for Richmond, the AFL will gift them about 35 MCG games in the next couple of years.

Plenty of opportunities to unfurl.
https://twitter.com/NeilStewartWC/status/1364193659562848258


Quote from: Francis Leach
Headline “the team just want a happy result..”
World first, Happy Divorce! Nothing these Tigers can’t do....
Quote from: Mel Burnian
Richmond won't win the flag this year, thanks to Damien's Hardwick.
Quote from: david field
Why is this even happening? If I made a statement about my bosses divorce publicly I’d expect to be out of a job the next day.
Quote from: A simple person
Cotchin is a dirty player too
https://twitter.com/SaintFrankly/status/1363978652593975297
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 24, 2021, 06:51:40 PM
Quote from: WhyPhilWhy?
No matter what you think of our recent performances, we stopped a 4-peat.
Quote from: 90 nice
Yep we stopped 4 flags in a row for richmond we had a hand in it again just like we did to Melbourne in the 50s Brisbane in 2004 couldn’t make it 4 either could hawthorn in 2016 been beaten by Footscray in that semi final the 4 straight flags record remains to Collingwood.
I feel 2021 we will have a new premier not Collingwood but another team like Brisbane west coast Geelong or I’ll love to see stkilda win it.
Quote from: Piesnchness
BIG Texan Mason Cox terrifies the Tiger fans, that i do know, they are very wary of him, never got over the 2018 Prelim !
https://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/viewtopic.php?t=88399
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 25, 2021, 05:20:29 PM
Quote from: tracey morrison
If Richmond decide not to unfurl their flags Round One, please feel free to return the home game to Carlton. The whole reason they have this as their home game , again , is for that precise reason and goodwill due to Covid restrictions last year.
Quote from: Navyblue_Bec
Is that the real reason Richmond got the home game Round 1? WTF! Did the AFL really give them that as a goodwill consideration? Talk about favouritism.
Quote from: Tracey Reid
Money don't matter as it's a 50/50 split been that way a few years now. This season is a reason we really needed it as our home game due to 50% as Richmond is getting a higher allocation of tickets I read yesterday in a story from TheAge.
Quote from: Q D
Sick and tired of AFL giving a leg up to Richmond. Fairness within the league is a joke!
https://twitter.com/tmorrison888/status/1364335254475993088

Quote from: Ben
Would take any interstate team winning the flag in AFL over Richmond 101 times out of 100.

While im at it the storm can get in the bin as well.
https://twitter.com/ben_tiktok/status/1364402275800682497
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 27, 2021, 02:19:44 PM
Quote from: Numero Uno
You weren’t on the road, you were in a hub like every other team playing the majority of games at a neutral venue..

Hardest season ever lulllzzzzzzzz

hard for Richmond compared to the soft pampered draw they usually get.. doesn’t even compare to a normal eagles season

Quote from: Numero Uno
Yes we are fully aware we don’t get undeserved home grand finals

Quote from: Numero Uno
on the road means travelling to the other side of the country and playing the opposition at their home ground like the Eagles do 10 times plus finals every season...when did you do that at least once last season ?

and what 2 finals did we lose at home ?
is lying part of your usual tactics when loosing an argument

like i said tough compared to Richmonds normal dream run ...toughest flag ever lulllllllllllllzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/west-coast-eagles-2021.1252212/page-30
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 03, 2021, 02:59:01 AM
Quote from: WASS
“Anyone but Richmond”, that’ll be my mantra this year.

Quote from: WASS
Haha, yep even if it’s Collingwood. That’s how sick I am of Richmond and their supporters. It’s worse than when Hawthorn were good; at least they had some likeable players (Cyril, Bud etc)

Quote from: WASS
According to Richmond supporters it was the greatest, most difficult premiership, of any competition, ever in the history of the world.

Quote from: Thatsashame
Tigers won’t get another finals series with no injuries. Early tip, they don’t make the GF. Cats to win it

Quote from: Paul D
honestly eff richmond. it’s as bad as when the hawks were winning it every year without the aesthetic appeal

Quote from: Liam Salter
And Richmond aren’t pretentious? I begrudgingly respect them, but I don’t think I’d be able to handle them winning another premiership anytime soon.

Quote from: WASS
Is it Richmond supporters who are arguing that it’s the greatest flag of all time?
Quote from: Johnno
It’s not as if Richmond had a tougher task than any other team.
Quote from: WASS
West Coast clearly had the toughest task. I mean, they had to play several games in a row away from home.

Quote from: Joe Blackswan
Greatest flag of all time? Weren’t Richmond the favourite at the star of the season? If you are the favourite, is it really that remarkable? Also, Richmond didn’t have to travel, as they were based in qld, and they played at a neutral venue. The Western Bulldogs premiership was more remarkable imo.
https://www.theroar.com.au/2021/03/01/your-clubs-burning-question-for-2021/
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on March 03, 2021, 08:58:03 AM
Lol

If anyone else had won it would be the toughest premierships ever.

As I have said before - if we win it will be tainted or compromised.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: lamington on March 03, 2021, 01:44:31 PM
I literally watch the Dusty GF highlights every day. Amazing premiership
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 06, 2021, 06:48:08 PM
Quote from: Leigh Gruppetta
Tigers could win 10 flags on the trot and their fans would still find something to whinge about.
https://twitter.com/LeighGruppetta
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on March 06, 2021, 11:59:39 PM
Well that's obviously just someone who knows claw.... :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 09, 2021, 04:25:18 AM
Carlton fans (re: Zac Williams suspension):

Quote from: JanetClare
Will Trent Cotchin get a week if he does the same thing Week 1? Only then will we know if a precedent has been set
@afl
https://twitter.com/Janetclare313/status/1368847612619616257

Quote from: The Fantom
... neither was Cotchin when he knocked out Dylan Sheil in 2017 prelim.
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/2021-mro-chook-lotto-carlton-tribunal-news-reports.1257181/
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Chuck17 on March 09, 2021, 08:03:02 AM
Well that's obviously just someone who knows claw.... :shh

We shouldnt be judged by the lowest denominator
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: lamington on March 09, 2021, 09:36:27 AM
stuff those Carlton fans are delusional. Zac Williams literally jumped off the ground to collect Clark high. Cotchin and Shiel were going for a 50/50 ball. Shiel himself even put on record what Cotchin did was fair in the heat of the game
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 11, 2021, 01:24:22 PM
Quote from: DanWA
Richmond fans are still pretty upset about 2018

Not having a 3peat leaves them short of a dynasty
Quote from: DanWA
The clear deflection regarding a record 7 in a row mcg games leading into the finals for the eventual premiers

Very similar to the 2016 Bulldogs season but at the business end
Quote from: DanWA
The answer is the Victorian teams should travel more
Quote from: DanWA
All the interstate clubs in the middle of MCG games so 7 games at the same venue to set up a flag doesn't happen again
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/west-coast-eagles-2021.1252212/page-31
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 14, 2021, 04:12:54 AM
Quote from: Jack Hudson
I think I'm gonna get to just before the prelim part of Marking Their Mark and just cancel my Amazon Prime.
https://twitter.com/jhudson_10/status/1370379541764468743

Quote from: James Saretta
So #MakingTheirMark has only strengthened my dislike for Hardwick.
https://twitter.com/JamesSaretta/status/1370665246935773191

Quote from: Jay
Hey guys, just letting you all know that the ‘Making Their Mark’ series on Amazon is an absolute farce, because as we all know, there was no such thing as football in 2020.

Shall always be remembered as an absolute Clayton’s flag, with a real St.Kilda pre-season cup feel to it.
https://twitter.com/drunk_logic/status/1370628950636982272

Quote from: Fairls
Struggling to watch Damien Hardwick on #MakingTheirMark knowing what happened during/after all of this
https://twitter.com/fairls/status/1370557521614708737

Quote from: Max Blake
Honestly I’d love to watch #MakingTheirMark - but I just can’t. Too much Richmond, losing to them in the GF still has a sour taste and I don’t want to go into their incur sanctum. One day I may watch it, or they could just edit their part out?
https://twitter.com/maxblake44/status/1370490541582950402
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 14, 2021, 10:35:50 PM
Quote from: Joel Hibble
It's extraordinary. It was the same in 2019. They won the flag, yet had to keep bringing up things from the prelim.

Insecure lot.
Quote from: Max Blake
All them beltings we gave them for 3 decades - and now they have a mini glory patch against us. F*** I wished we traded for Mason Cox - their reactions would of been priceless
https://twitter.com/j_hibble/status/1370654659803717632

Quote from: ILE p
Bandwagon scum is all they are. Flogs couldn't name 3 of their players a few years back but now they're all die hard. Turds
https://twitter.com/petkovski643/status/1370871867590909952

Quote from: ILE p
Can't recall if he jumped off the ground but I think Cotchin did something similar except nearly broke the guys face and still got off before a final. If only Williams was wearing a Tigers jersey ay
https://twitter.com/petkovski643/status/1369381681677938692
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: lamington on March 15, 2021, 10:04:14 AM
I wish I had Amazon prime now
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on March 16, 2021, 09:15:14 AM
I wish I had Amazon prime now

Best $6.99 you will ever spend
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 16, 2021, 08:09:47 PM
Quote from: Neil Stewart
Poor Dimma. Let’s all lobby the AFL so Richmond can have a few more MCG games this year. Eighteen sounds fair.
https://twitter.com/NeilStewartWC/status/1371391134715367425

Quote from: SAEventsFan
I am disappointed for both of them but more so Stengle as habits are hard to break and it cost him his career. Unlucky to be drafted into Richmonds culture initially, where the habit started.

Quote from: SAEventsFan
Stengle started a Richmond the only club in the AFL willing to give Cousins a game. It is in your culture. Adelaide is a professional club, which is why other clubs wants it’s developed players.
https://twitter.com/rjhm40/status/1370339714239062018
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: lamington on March 17, 2021, 12:40:38 AM
LOL! because nothing bad ever happened at Adelaide!
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on March 17, 2021, 10:22:50 AM
Wow and they crap on about how one eyed Richmond supporters are.

That is too funny I will be laughing for the rest of the day
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on March 17, 2021, 03:11:56 PM
Stengle was fine with us :)
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on March 17, 2021, 08:05:26 PM
Fine or fined? :shh

Should get him back and move him in with Stacky...what could possibly go wrong? :shh :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 18, 2021, 12:51:36 PM
Re: Making their Mark doco.

Quote from: Jaz 🖤
Anyone else find the Richmond segments boring as bats**t? Blah blah blah we are f****** awesome. No emotional/personal connections happening.
Quote from: lauren 🌚
legit tuned out during all their scenes and skipped the grand final part completely in the last episode 💀 think the board aspect was a pretty bad choice, would have been more personal using a player
Quote from: Jaz 🖤
Yes! There is no actual personal insight to players or anything. I actually want to skip it every time I see Richmond come up on the screen. Maybe Bulldogs would have been more interesting 🤷🏽‍♀️😬
https://twitter.com/JazzyHinch/status/1371823667294867460
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 19, 2021, 03:48:57 PM
Richmond starting the season with a win sure brings out the sookies  :laugh:.

Quote from: flynno_22
Will Richmond be fined/lose premiership points for rorting the new sub rule in round 1... probably not.
Will Nick Vlaustin play next week.. most definitely.
https://twitter.com/flynno_22/status/1372703158598705154

Quote from: Todd Davey
Richmond Umpire Club in full effect #AFLTigersBlues
https://twitter.com/ToddJDavey/status/1372478934122700800

Quote from: Stephen
Appalling one sided umpiring hands Richmond another win.
Quote from: Matt Macrow
3 goals gifted vs none and ignoring their own rule when a tiger moved off the mark 55m out. How much did they win by again?
https://twitter.com/AFL/status/1372508415738580998

Quote from: Rebecca Ruthen
Oh how I've missed 7Richmond
Quote from: Samuel Power
7Richmond is back.
Quote from: Caleb Vano
7Richmond at it again
https://twitter.com/7AFL/status/1372459858369380352

Quote from: AFL opinions
I want to see another team win it, not Richmond that will be so boring to see.
Quote from: em
Anyone bar Richmond hopefully...
Quote from: Bruzzy The Bull
Literally anyone but Richmond
Quote from: ChaCha
Please just dont be Richmond
Quote from: Ashley Legal
Looks like Richmond again based upon the dream run from the umpires so far in this game!! It really is a joke !
Quote from: richmondtigers_biggest_hater_
Anyone but Richmond
https://twitter.com/AFL/status/1372441387736633345
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Loui Tufga on March 19, 2021, 05:02:17 PM
Wasn’t the tee kick count 15-25 in there favour?
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: wayne on March 19, 2021, 05:10:34 PM
Yeah, let's take off one of our most important players to bring on Ross. If we were rorting it, we would have taken Caddy off.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Owl on March 19, 2021, 05:42:49 PM
LOL the free kick count was preposterous and they still weep dessicated salt
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on March 19, 2021, 09:18:15 PM
What is the meaning behind 7Richmond?
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: WilliamPowell on March 19, 2021, 09:30:26 PM
What is the meaning behind 7Richmond?

Ch 7 commentary favouring Richmond
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: lamington on March 20, 2021, 08:13:57 PM
What is the meaning behind 7Richmond?

Channel 7 have an Instagram page called 7afl so all the salty people say “7richmond” because their social media team chooses to highlight Dusty’s insane goal and they are immensely jealous the tigers are finally a dominant force
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on March 21, 2021, 12:33:55 AM
Excellent thanks guys

Love we are back feels like the 70s again
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 21, 2021, 05:25:56 PM
In response to Jon Ralph's article about Dusty and this year's Brownlow.

Quote from: Mark Alvey
Here we go again, getting beyond ridiculous this.
Quote from: Platinumflyer33
Stop the arm bar he uses then see what happens - this is a deliberate push no different to any other push.
Quote from: Jaycee
99% of his possessions are in the forward half. Never gets down back to help out. As good as he is he often gets on his own because others are always helping others out. His defensive efforts are average. He doesn’t have the tank to be a true midfielder.
https://twitter.com/RalphyHeraldSun/status/1373065481528041476
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 24, 2021, 06:31:14 PM
Quote from: David S Shearer
Richmond this year 16home games- how easy is that versus every interstate team only 11home games🎩 competition weighted in favour of Victorian Teams🎩 no other world ranked sporting competition has such bias🎩 AFL for balance shift 2games = more TV $ & less travel less cost
https://twitter.com/DavidSShearer1/status/1373617466715168774


Quote from: My name's Janiel - Recall Basil
The evidence that VicBias is real is in Carlton v Richmond locked in to open the season forever, despite exactly zero good or memorable games, and the only memorable moment being when Cousins came back and did his hammy.
https://twitter.com/RCT_10/status/1372337616566198273


Quote from: Black Cat
No issue with the Dangerfield suspension but I still can’t figure out how Cotchin played in the 2017 Grand Final.
Quote from: Shane
Because it was the captain of a big Melbourne club who would be missing out on a Grand Final
Quote from: KingOfCamo
Richmond & the AFL. We immediately stopped the negative PR surrounding us wearing the Away Guernsey in the GF & Cotchin was cleared. Cotch was on his last strike which meant an auto week by the rules but was overruled
Quote from: tr1p1ea
Not to mention running 30m out of his way to deliberately take our Miers, a kid, who was our best player up until that point in the game in the prelim ... Right after suspending Hawkins for exactly what Houli got off for :rollin
https://twitter.com/TheBlackCat1859/status/1374290211950186497

Quote from: Rob
Funny how’s there’s little talk about how Richmond exploited the sub rule in the first game. Bombers lost by a point could have used the fresh legs.
Quote from: Stayfrosty
Haha Richmond is the AFL darling at the moment.
https://twitter.com/Cpcc15/status/1374096801100300288
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on March 24, 2021, 10:58:00 PM
Quote from: David S Shearer
Richmond this year 16home games- how easy is that versus every interstate team only 11home games🎩 competition weighted in favour of Victorian Teams🎩 no other world ranked sporting competition has such bias🎩 AFL for balance shift 2games = more TV $ & less travel less cost
https://twitter.com/DavidSShearer1/status/1373617466715168774

16? Eagle fans have trouble understanding that most of our home games are Victorian derbies if we're comparing them to what interstate clubs like West Coast have (10 home games against interstate sides & 2 derbies).

We have just 3 home games at the 'G against interstate sides compared to the Eagles' 10,
plus 1 'home' game at Docklands against an interstate opponent,
7 home derby games at the 'G against Vic clubs,
4 away derby games at the 'G against Vic clubs,
1 away game at Docklands against a Vic club,
6 away games interstate.

In any case, we've won away interstate finals whereas the Eagles have choked at home. That's why we've won 3 flags in 4 years and they haven't.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 28, 2021, 06:14:25 PM
Quote from: Dockerman3
Oh FFS! Players kick goals like that every weekend. Why is this suddenly a 'Dusty' thing?
Quote from: Dave
Mowed strips are 10m wide, covered two of them.
How far can you run without bouncing again?
Quote from: Noam
Yea, but where was the fend off to the throat?
https://twitter.com/AFL/status/1376010594873057281
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 28, 2021, 10:18:17 PM
Quote from: Neil Stewart
Can’t recall a multi-premiership team that has been as completely and entirely reliant on the feats of one player as this Richmond side #nodustynoflags
Quote from: Neil Stewart
Hawks won a flag the year after Buddy left. Watch Richmond fall into a heap when Dusty eventually retires.
https://twitter.com/NeilStewartWC/status/1376021093715042308

Quote from: rogiebear93
We lost the game, which isn't a surprise at all really considering the outs. Take away 3 of Richmond's 5 best players and give us ours back and they're not winning that one.
Quote from: Come back Cyril
It's amazing that even with rules designed to open up the game, Richmond makes it an unwatchable defensive scrap..
Quote from: HairyO
Yep. Richmond shove in every contest knowing maybe 20% will be called. Much easier than relying on a 50/50 contest.
Quote from: cryptor
Also sick of hearing about how good an aerial team Richmond is. Any team could be considered that if they were able to get away with pushing and holding as much as they were today.
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/round-2-2021-hawthorn-defeated-by-richmond.1260286/page-8
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on March 29, 2021, 09:32:51 AM
Seems like we are the only team holding......
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on March 29, 2021, 01:05:03 PM
Most flags/dynasties come on on the back of one or two superstars. Regardless of whether or not they're BOG on Grand Final day.
How many flags would they have won in the 70's without Matthews? :shh

Not the mention the flags they won in the 80's because the VFL changed the zones to stop us dominating...just like the AFL are changing the rules now to try and stop us.... :shh :shh

...and the Clarkson dynasty side was as boring as batshyte to watch. Uncontested kick-mark keepings-off snoozefest for the most part.:shh :shh :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on March 29, 2021, 01:14:50 PM
Most flags/dynasties come on on the back of one or two superstars. Regardless of whether or not they're BOG on Grand Final day.
How many flags would they have won in the 70's without Matthews? :shh

Not the mention the flags they won in the 80's because the VFL changed the zones to stop us dominating...just like the AFL are changing the rules now to try and stop us.... :shh :shh

...and the Clarkson dynasty side was as boring as batshyte to watch. Uncontested kick-mark keepings-off snoozefest for the most part.:shh :shh :shh

Yep, never thought I'd see the day that names like Riewoldt, Cotchin, Grimes, Lynch etc go unnoticed because we only have one good player named Dusty  ::)

Heck only so long ago we had the best defender of the modern era still playing, but apparently now we are a team of Dusty + sidekicks.

How ridiculous.

If he was that good you'd expect to hear about it but in their next breath they are complaining that Dusty isn't even that good anyway but he's the AFL pin-up boy.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tiger Khosh on March 29, 2021, 01:50:07 PM
Most flags/dynasties come on on the back of one or two superstars. Regardless of whether or not they're BOG on Grand Final day.
How many flags would they have won in the 70's without Matthews? :shh

Not the mention the flags they won in the 80's because the VFL changed the zones to stop us dominating...just like the AFL are changing the rules now to try and stop us.... :shh :shh

...and the Clarkson dynasty side was as boring as batshyte to watch. Uncontested kick-mark keepings-off snoozefest for the most part.:shh :shh :shh

Yep, never thought I'd see the day that names like Riewoldt, Cotchin, Grimes, Lynch etc go unnoticed because we only have one good player named Dusty  ::)

Heck only so long ago we had the best defender of the modern era still playing, but apparently now we are a team of Dusty + sidekicks.

How ridiculous.

If he was that good you'd expect to hear about it but in their next breath they are complaining that Dusty isn't even that good anyway but he's the AFL pin-up boy.

Lol we live in a parallel universe where one player can simultaneously drag a team to 3 flags in 4 years but also be overrated....
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 29, 2021, 07:50:39 PM
FREEKICK RICHMOND | 2020 AFL GRAND FINAL

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sSDdDn2NFXU

---------------------------------------------------------

Quote from: k.carr
thats the difference between hawk era and tig wannabees..there was healthy strong competition, not a reason to brag about much at all really...beats us by 29, lets celebrate the Martin 1 man band and rub it in..lol #AFLHawksTigers
https://twitter.com/kcarr_51/status/1376072142945574912
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 30, 2021, 02:09:11 PM
Quote from: Magoo
The issue is that Rutten has been teaching "team defence" Richmond style of last decade. Unfortunately, the new rules have created a new style that requires players to mark an opponent instead of blades of grass. Rutten's approach is doomed to failure.
Quote from: James Mantella
Your right. Richmond look like they are about to fall off a cliff!

Rutten is trying to teach them to win the ball. Every team that wins their own ball,  controls the game.
https://twitter.com/jomagoo68/status/1376412951058374660

Quote from: Jason
How many Essendon players would get a game at Richmond?
Quote from: DW
Most I'd say. While it's a great team, on paper the names aren't much to look at.
https://twitter.com/jasondon73/status/1376634215131803649
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: lamington on March 30, 2021, 08:23:00 PM
This is hands down the best thread.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on March 31, 2021, 08:58:02 AM
Essendon blokes getting a game for Richmond. Fmd

Half their team is injured and most of their own supporters hate their own list for being useless.

I'd take Tippa for Rioli.

Probably try to squeeze McGrath and Merrett in at the expense of guys like Pickett and Caddy.


That's about it.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Chuck17 on March 31, 2021, 09:20:40 AM
Would take Shiel as a mercy situation so he could learn how to toughen up from Cotch
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: WilliamPowell on March 31, 2021, 11:36:20 AM
Would take Shiel as a mercy situation so he could learn how to toughen up from Cotch

 :lol

 :rollin
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on March 31, 2021, 11:51:37 AM
I'd take Heppell over Conca..... :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on April 01, 2021, 04:35:56 AM
Quote from: Travis Lubke
You don’t need to stop Dusty to beat Richmond the Lions showed that in the Qualifying final last year

Quote from: Travis Lubke
You got lucky playing Geelong
https://twitter.com/superblueiris/status/1376853833012277251
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Chuck17 on April 01, 2021, 10:33:58 AM
Classic from Harris Andrews if true

https://wwos.nine.com.au/afl/chris-scott-lachie-neale-afl-punishment-suspended-fine-line-in-sand/f493f9a4-d102-4a19-b8f5-d0c8c08f4abc

According to AFL reporter Damian Barrett, after Scott had suggested that the Lions players, namely Lachie Neale, had been 'soft' in the opening quarter, teammate Harris Andrews responded with "not as soft as you pricks in the grand final".
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on April 02, 2021, 08:05:22 AM
Quote from: Back One Out
Richmond have benefitted from the expansion teams diluting the talent pool. It casts a shadow over their dynasty

GWS and Gold Coast hogged all the best young talent - the Giants were proved to be September pretenders, easy pickings for the Tigers. Put those same players in a decent club with history, fans and culture and they probably would've flogged Richmond. Alas, it was an artificial AFL construct who were handed a Grand Final team on a platter thanks to silly recruiting concessions. But their overpaid, spoiled young stars were no match for a proud, blue collar Victorian club with a 100 year history and 100,000 fans behind it.

The Suns basically squandered all their talent due to poor admin, poor coaching, poor club culture and a lack of player development. Many of their players were just taking the pee. Richmond were also fortunate to poach their 2 best players: Prestia and Lynch, both keys to Richmond flags

So who exactly did Richmond beat to win those flags? Who were the other good teams from 2017 to 2020?

There was a vacuum created by the AFL expansion. It didn't happen immediately in the first few years, but we saw its eroding effects after several seasons.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

The Tigers have also yet to match the 3 flags won by Brisbane, Geelong and Hawthorn 2013-15

There were only 17 home & away games in 2020 instead of the customary 22. The season was reduced by 22.7%
Matches were also shortened by 20%. Really, the 2020 flag should only be counted as 0.8 of a premiership to reflect this reduction.

It wasn't a true test. It was a Mickey Mouse season played under Covid restrictions for the benefit of Channel 7 and the AFL's TV rights money
You know this is true, however much you all try to talk it up... :thumbsu:

Bris 2001-03..... 3 premierships
Geel 2007-11.... 3 premierships
Haw 2013-15.... 3 premierships
Rich 2017-20*... 2.8 premierships
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/greatest-dynasty-of-the-21st-century-lions-vs-cats-vs-hawks-vs-tigers.1250715/page-152
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on April 02, 2021, 09:42:55 AM
Wow lol.

At the end of the day it just says:

2017 - Richmond
2019 - Richmond
2020 - Richmond
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on April 02, 2021, 10:01:34 AM
Theres some serious mental illness going on in some of these other supporter bases. Another 2021 premiership for the tigers will send them completely over the edge.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tiger Khosh on April 02, 2021, 11:51:23 AM
Lol that’s a bit rich coming from a hawks supporter. Their 3 flags also coming against interstate expansion teams. And if any team benefited from GWS and Gold Coast coming into the league it was the hawks. When they were up and about all of the top end draft picks were going to gws and the Gold Coast which made it harder for the teams below them to add the top end talent that they normally would.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on April 05, 2021, 05:25:35 AM
Quote from: X-man
Cry me a bloody river they’ve been kissed on the proverbial with basically no injuries to important players the last 4 years
https://twitter.com/XTweeptweep01/status/1378285132184875009

Quote from: Matt
When Richmond lose Dusty looks horrible.

When Fremantle lose Fyfe is still BOG

Dusty may be the best big game player ever.

But Fyfe is the best player in the game
Quote from: Luke H
Dusty would be rubbish in a bottom 8 side
https://twitter.com/LukePH10/status/1378210504003317766
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on April 05, 2021, 05:16:26 PM
Quote from: kyatheperson
Quote from: tiger_lady17
How many weeks if you concuss a pigeon?
if its richmond 0 other clubs 6+
https://www.instagram.com/p/CNReLLqF7ul/
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on April 05, 2021, 06:33:03 PM
Quote from: Matt
When Richmond lose Dusty looks horrible.

When Fremantle lose Fyfe is still BOG

Dusty may be the best big game player ever.

But Fyfe is the best player in the game
Quote from: Luke H
Dusty would be rubbish in a bottom 8 side
https://twitter.com/LukePH10/status/1378210504003317766


Must be why he came third in the Brownlow in 2016 when we only won 8 games and finished 13th......#coolstorybro :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on April 05, 2021, 06:57:21 PM
Most flags/dynasties come on on the back of one or two superstars. Regardless of whether or not they're BOG on Grand Final day.
How many flags would they have won in the 70's without Matthews? :shh

Not the mention the flags they won in the 80's because the VFL changed the zones to stop us dominating...just like the AFL are changing the rules now to try and stop us.... :shh :shh

...and the Clarkson dynasty side was as boring as batshyte to watch. Uncontested kick-mark keepings-off snoozefest for the most part.:shh :shh :shh

Yep, never thought I'd see the day that names like Riewoldt, Cotchin, Grimes, Lynch etc go unnoticed because we only have one good player named Dusty  ::)

Heck only so long ago we had the best defender of the modern era still playing, but apparently now we are a team of Dusty + sidekicks.

How ridiculous.

If he was that good you'd expect to hear about it but in their next breath they are complaining that Dusty isn't even that good anyway but he's the AFL pin-up boy.

Lol we live in a parallel universe where one player can simultaneously drag a team to 3 flags in 4 years but also be overrated....

(https://i.imgflip.com/54fal2.jpg)

 :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tiger Khosh on April 06, 2021, 01:01:54 AM
 :lol
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on April 06, 2021, 10:08:23 AM

Lol

Don't forget the 'crap team, good system' one haha
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on April 07, 2021, 07:35:26 PM
“Trust me, Richmond did not want to play us [Collingwood] in that Grand Final and they would’ve been giving high fives after GWS got in there.

Collingwood really break down their game and defend really well on them and they really worry about Mason Cox and Brody Mihocek and they would’ve been going ‘GWS just handed us the flag’.”

- Matt Rendell on SEN

https://www.sen.com.au/news/2021/04/07/it-cost-them-a-grand-final-spot-rendell-frustrated-with-conservative-magpies/
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on April 07, 2021, 07:43:27 PM
(https://memegenerator.net/img/instances/59687795/coulda-woulda-shoulda.jpg)

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on April 11, 2021, 08:14:18 PM
Quote from: benlee1979
Richmond fans nowhere to be seen between 1980 and 2016. Only there for the good times, will disappear again once their glory days are over

I guess that’s where Essendon fans are different we always attend and stay members even when we’re pinned to the bottom ✈️🛫🚀
https://twitter.com/benlee1979/with_replies
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on April 14, 2021, 03:40:05 PM
Quote from: kaiserchief13
They changed the rules to make games better viewing with more goals. The way Richmond played over the past 4-5 years is not meant to be how the game should be played

The game is meant to be open, free flowing with big marks. Richmonds style is hold, tackle and try and force a turnover then rush the ball forward like a rugby game

Quote from: Lavender bushranger
Richmond winning didn't concern me. Their supporters are battlers and I don't begrudge them having some joy in their lives.

It was their style of play. The suffocation of the traditional and core skills of AFL footy that made them unwatchable.

The only thing that made them even remotely watchable was Dustin Martin.

Quote from: Obeanie1
Richmond's game plan is to flood back, not really attempt to contest in the forward line or midfield, just slow play down and set up their defense. Then cause a turnover and surge forward with chaos ball movement as fast as possible.

That isn't how football traditionally was played. Traditionally it was man on man. Mids v mids and forwards v backs. No flooding, no zones and no chaos ball movement.

Man on man. Tall v tall. Small v small.
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/lindrum-tigers-were-the-new-rule-changes-brought-in-to-curtail-richmonds-dominance.1261401/


Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Willy on April 14, 2021, 03:49:16 PM
Most flags/dynasties come on on the back of one or two superstars. Regardless of whether or not they're BOG on Grand Final day.
How many flags would they have won in the 70's without Matthews? :shh

Not the mention the flags they won in the 80's because the VFL changed the zones to stop us dominating...just like the AFL are changing the rules now to try and stop us.... :shh :shh

...and the Clarkson dynasty side was as boring as batshyte to watch. Uncontested kick-mark keepings-off snoozefest for the most part.:shh :shh :shh

Yep, never thought I'd see the day that names like Riewoldt, Cotchin, Grimes, Lynch etc go unnoticed because we only have one good player named Dusty  ::)

Heck only so long ago we had the best defender of the modern era still playing, but apparently now we are a team of Dusty + sidekicks.

How ridiculous.

If he was that good you'd expect to hear about it but in their next breath they are complaining that Dusty isn't even that good anyway but he's the AFL pin-up boy.

Lol we live in a parallel universe where one player can simultaneously drag a team to 3 flags in 4 years but also be overrated....

(https://i.imgflip.com/54fal2.jpg)

 :shh


 :lol spot on.

These clowns are hilarious.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on April 16, 2021, 04:07:40 AM
Quote from: Nicholas
Next 3 rounds for @Richmond_FC are at the MCG protected much.... no not at all. God for bit if they should travel out side of Melbourne @AFL
Quote from: Nicholas
If every @AFL team was as protected as @Richmond_FC not travelling anywhere, everyone would win, I think all remaining rounds for @Richmond_FC are at home at the MCG
https://twitter.com/Sbroia91


Quote from: Luke
new richmond colours

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EzA5M7gVoAMtRLo?format=jpg&name=small)
https://twitter.com/lukedontcare_/status/1382667987157585926

Quote from: Sheldon Peters
It's amazing how much more unlikeable Lynch became since he went to Richmond. Got to love guys that can only give it out when they are playing in better teams.
https://twitter.com/ZoBlitz/status/1382659444866043906

Quote from: Jis Chrudd
Things that are more likeable than Tom Lynch include warm beer, light beer, warm light beer and razor blade sandwiches. #AFLSaintsTigers
https://twitter.com/JisChrudd/status/1382661336308457478

Quote from: Ben Jammin' (I play music)
Richmond playing American Football instead the amount they're throwing it
https://twitter.com/FasterPP3/status/1382659968524972033

Quote from: AFL Opinions
I'll say it now Richmond sorry to say play boring footy, they always had and always will. The game is boring the commentary is so horrible. And ill say it they favor dusty way too much. Agian ill use the word, boring plain boring. #AFLSaintsTigers #AFL
https://twitter.com/AFLOpinions1/status/1382660099752165381

Quote from: Lisa B
So f***** bored with Richmond. Same bored I was when Hawthorn kept winning. My soft spot for them has died completely...
https://twitter.com/LisaB_29/status/1382657811046309888
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on April 16, 2021, 06:34:42 AM
Quote from: Lisa B
So f***** bored with Richmond. Same bored I was when Hawthorn kept winning. My soft spot for them has died completely...
https://twitter.com/LisaB_29/status/1382657811046309888

This last one gives me a stiffy
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on April 17, 2021, 05:05:40 PM
Quote from: peter ryan
This is the eighth time Collingwood has played West Coast since 2018. In same time Richmond has played the Eagles just three times.
Quote from: Neil Stewart
And in that time, Richmond played WC in Perth only ONCE. Incredible, inexplicable fixturing.
Quote from: Neil Stewart
Wrong. WC have played Richmond at the MCG twice in that timeframe.

What’s interesting is that Richmond got absolutely belted on the one occasion they travelled and played the Eagles in Perth in the past 3 years.
Ed. West Coast has only played us once at the 'G since 2018.
Quote from: Neil Stewart
Actually you’re correct, my bad. Begs the question: why have the two most recent premiers played each other so few times?

Unlike Richmond with Perth games, WC want as many MCG games as possible.

Richmond have a knack of avoiding interstate travel. It’s uncanny.
Quote from: Neil Stewart
FOURTEEN games at the MCG (not including finals) scheduled for this year.

NINE out of their last TEN games including the GF at the MCG in lead up to their 2019 flag.

Dream run.
Quote from: PIZ
you do realise there are such things as co-tenants? Where else should they play?
Quote from: Neil Stewart
At the other most recent premiership winner’s home ground once a season?

Like they were fixtured to last year, but bitched out on by lobbying the AFL to move the game to QLD, resulting in a probable 8 premiership point swing that effectively secured top 4 for them.
https://twitter.com/NeilStewartWC/status/1383220547832619013
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on April 17, 2021, 05:08:50 PM
(https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/attachments/1618602951886-png.1104480/)
https://twitter.com/AFLOpinions1/status/1383085123759841284
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tigeritis™©® on April 17, 2021, 07:37:36 PM
We could’ve picked Oscar Allen but we picked CCJ instead.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on April 18, 2021, 01:14:50 AM
Allen looks good but how many big games has he had? Not to mention they gave Pies a belting with Howe off injured and Moore playing forward so they really only had Roughead and that random guy named Keane.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Willy on April 18, 2021, 03:09:45 PM
By god these Richmond haters are stupid!
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on April 21, 2021, 05:13:25 PM
Quote from: Daniel Tonks
Martin is only good when Richmond are winning. Fyfe still gets BOG when Freo get pumped.
Quote from: J.Stewart
100% true that - Martin been @afl golden child since 2017 - guess what richmond has been winning since then  :rollin
https://twitter.com/JStewar77121843/status/1384712638530154500
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: lamington on April 21, 2021, 08:35:21 PM
Quote from: Daniel Tonks
Martin is only good when Richmond are winning. Fyfe still gets BOG when Freo get pumped.
Quote from: J.Stewart
100% true that - Martin been @afl golden child since 2017 - guess what richmond has been winning since then  :rollin
https://twitter.com/JStewar77121843/status/1384712638530154500

And that’s precisely the reason why freo suck.

In 2016 when Martin and Rance dominated and were killing it stat wise, the rest of the team sucked. Rance acknowledged if he wanted success he had to do his best and help the other defenders get better also. I’m sure it’s the same thing with Martin and how he gives off just as many kickable goals as he scores.

There’s no point in one player being decent and getting all the SuperCoach points if the overall team play is rubbish (see Gary Ablett Gold Coast)
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on April 22, 2021, 04:11:39 AM
Quote from: daisycutter
it was a big mistake allowing them to use our ground as their home ground

so much for charity
https://demonland.com/forums/topic/49999-what-theyre-saying-down-at-punt-road/page/5/#comments
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on April 23, 2021, 02:44:44 PM
Quote from: Ash
Can the AFL do us all a favour and pull back on this love affair on dusty.  Ffs
Quote from: ElvisShobek
The Dusty fend gets put in the protected species box with Franklins play on but not play on kicking routine.
Quote from: Dave
Just about every example you've used is a free-kick against for contact above the shoulders
Quote from: O'B
If a non inked rookie did this...free kick everyday of the week but because his jumper sells...it’s play on.
Quote from: Rhino
All of those don’t argues should’ve been free kicks against him for too high contact
Quote from: Rob Kearsley
An atrocious amount of these are high to the throat
Quote from: Shrapnel
Most of them should have been paid high contact against him Man shrugging
Quote from: David
He’s actually not that strong, I would flatten that bloke
https://twitter.com/AFL/status/1385424635743723521
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on April 23, 2021, 06:20:04 PM
Quote from: J.Stewart
Quote from: Richmond FC
Richmond and Melbourne will honour a great of the game on Anzac Day Eve, awarding the inaugural Frank ‘Checker’ Hughes medal to the best player on the ground 🏅
(https://pbs.twimg.com/ad_img/1384716639355117574/nBqEHrOK?format=jpg&name=900x900)
What is the point!!!!!
@AFL has already gifted it to Dusty. Based on disposals and not looking correctly at stats. Plus it’s his 250 gotta make the fairytale ending again don’t we @afl
https://twitter.com/JStewar77121843/status/1384783162228678657
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on April 24, 2021, 05:45:56 AM
Quote from: WalkingCivilWar
A little cocky?!?! Geelong were a little cocky after 3 flags in 5 years. Hawthorn were a little cocky after their threepeat, as were Brisbane. No, Richmond are more than a little cocky. They’re positively nauseating. They are belligerent and conceited and sadly I think beating them tomoz won’t change a thing. They were unbearable in the late 60’s and early 70’s and it took a 38-year drought to bring them back to earth.
Quote from: SPC
Yeah I have the misfortune of some friends and work acquaintances who are tigers supporters. Some who I never knew were supporters until a few years ago. Now I get one text a year, after Anzac eve with some smug comments. Oh how I long for them to be crap again so their fans can go back to be miserable!
https://demonland.com/forums/topic/49999-what-theyre-saying-down-at-punt-road/page/6/#comments
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 02, 2021, 04:25:20 AM
Quote from: X-Man
Most average 3x premiership team ever let’s be honest
https://twitter.com/XTweeptweep01/status/1388084597364244485

Quote from: Gerkonimo
Absolutely bulls***. I can’t believe I just wasted $45 watching umpires run training drills for Richmond #freekickrichmond #afl@afl @Richmond_FC your flogs
https://twitter.com/Gerkonimo/status/1388116272223645697

Quote from: AFL Opinions
Typical umpiring favour Richmond time and time again. Tom Lynch i still think is horrible yes he kicked some goals. But look at his behinds the easiest kicks can get. So Richmond fans deal with it, it's an opinion if you can't take it then shhh. #AFL #AFLDogsTigers #Footy
https://twitter.com/AFLOpinions1/status/1388098132353769472

Quote from: The other JT
Cotchin telling porkies about his hammy to justify the medical sub?? #AFLTigersDogs
https://twitter.com/johntaylor130/status/1388106771911254022

Quote from: Elodie
Imagine being Patrick Naish and having your first senior game in a year being 4 mins of junk time cause Cotchin had a pretend injury. Been some real shining examples of using the injury sub appropriately in the last week!!  #AFLTigersDogs
https://twitter.com/smellodiee/status/1388108067963752452

Quote from: Scott Gumbleton
When Cotchin goes in for his “scan” he’ll just say scan whatever you like. What a croc of BS #AFLTigersDogs
https://twitter.com/scottgumbleton/status/1388106928220368899

Quote from: Neil Stewart
Here’s a stunning revelation that will shake the AFL world to it’s core: the Tigers are dead set decidedly run of the mill mediocre without Dustin Martin #onemanteam #AFLTigersDogs
Quote from: Neil Stewart
Usually when Lynch is this woefully out of form he cowardly snipes an opponent and gets a pardon from the MRP. Watch this space. #AFLTigersDogs
Quote from: Neil Stewart
Richmond have played five of their first seven games this year at the MCG.  #AFLTigersDogs
Quote from: Neil Stewart
Exactly. Why are the reigning premiers gifted a more favourable draw than the also-rans?

It seems to be a recurring question, year after year.
Quote from: Neil Stewart
Quote from: Jon Ralph
Ralph Carr on Shai Bolton’s future in March in @heraldsunsport. “My feeling is he won’t move from Tigerland. He’ll stay. He is a ripping kid and why would he want to go anywhere else. He’s only just turned 22 and his breakout year is probably this year.” Just might cost 💰 💴 💵
WA lad. Would look good in Eagles colours.

Might be keen to move to a club with a better culture after all the off-field transgressions from the top down at Richmond.
https://twitter.com/NeilStewartWC
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on May 02, 2021, 08:07:59 AM
Holy crap they get fired up after we have a win haha.

This Neil Stewart guy is on something bloody hell.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Damo on May 02, 2021, 01:31:43 PM
How’s the idiots saying we rorted the sub
Seems like tactical genius with 4 minutes left in a game that was over LMAO

Logical thinking just doesn’t work for these empty vessels
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Fluffy Tiger on May 02, 2021, 10:38:02 PM
Such a easy draw. Have played 4 of the top 5 teams with the 5th this week.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 05, 2021, 03:47:16 PM
Quote from: Patrick Kelleher
Bloody Richmond on a Friday night again no wonder their business is thriving there in every Thursday Friday game all year! Melb v syd how about a showdown! Or even freo v Brisbane games should be shared around #AFL #boremond
https://twitter.com/pattykelleher4/status/1389530917736091648
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on May 06, 2021, 09:13:48 AM
Quote from: Patrick Kelleher
Bloody Richmond on a Friday night again no wonder their business is thriving there in every Thursday Friday game all year! Melb v syd how about a showdown! Or even freo v Brisbane games should be shared around #AFL #boremond
https://twitter.com/pattykelleher4/status/1389530917736091648

He is down the wrong track there. We got this Friday game because the real AFL love child Geelong is playing
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 06, 2021, 08:52:59 PM
Quote from: Neil Stewart
Quote from: Todd Davey
A live look at Richmond's membership recruiting drive

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E0oZPxgUYAIrLeD?format=jpg&name=small)
Trust me, every single one of those Jack Russells starts barking when you point out that 9 of their last 10 games including the GF were at the G in 2019, or that they had a competition high five instances of >2day break advantages over their opponents in 2020.
https://twitter.com/ToddJDavey/status/1389951195842682884
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 07, 2021, 04:28:40 AM
Quote from: Leigh Ritchie"
Rd 1-6 the Dogs ave 30+ shots on goal with an accuracy of 49%

Rd 7 they had 20 shots on goal at 35%

If the dogs increased their shots to their season average of 30+ and stayed at 35% they would’ve won.
https://twitter.com/LionelRitchie18/status/1389405534952968195
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on May 07, 2021, 10:00:29 AM
Quote from: Leigh Ritchie"
Rd 1-6 the Dogs ave 30+ shots on goal with an accuracy of 49%

Rd 7 they had 20 shots on goal at 35%

If the dogs increased their shots to their season average of 30+ and stayed at 35% they would’ve won.
https://twitter.com/LionelRitchie18/status/1389405534952968195

And yet Richmond recorded something like 16 straight inside 50's to start the 3rd quarter in a flogging that makes the whipping of Geez Geez seem like gentle foreplay.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 09, 2021, 03:36:53 PM
Quote from: James Buckler
Richmond lose, Australia wins.
Quote from: Tsim Booky
It’s the muppet supporters faces I’d like to see
Like the muppet last week dressed in a Spartan warrior outfit behind the goals
Feral tigers supporters
3 flags in 37 years and they think they’re a dynasty
 :lol
Quote from: Matthew Wegener
can't see Richmond even making the 8! What a disgrace of a club
Quote from: Brandon Hearn
Awwwwww its a bit harder this year for richmond when they have to get on the road instead of when covid last year gave them back to back to back to back home games 😂😂👌🏼👌🏼
Quote from: Leigh Griffiths
Richmond will beat north Melbourne and the commentators will talk about them being the greatest team in history
Quote from: AFL Postie Squad
Is there anything better than watching Richmond lose?
Quote from: Damon Simpkin
Geelong robbed of about 20 holding the ball free kicks should of been 9-41. Typical umpires going against Geelong, it’s got to stop
Quote from: AFL Reports, News and Whispers
2020 FLAG WAS GIFTED TO RICHMOND!
Quote from: Jay Parker
Unfortunately Richmond didn’t have the fellas in Green helping them tonight and geelong just demolished them!!
Quote from: Dean Hamilton
Im just happy the Richmond players & coaching staff weren't spat on from their own "fanbase" AGAIN!!!🤣🤣🤣
https://www.facebook.com/AFL/posts/10158148789786417
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 12, 2021, 06:07:50 AM
Quote from: Neil Stewart
The culture at this club is a real problem for the AFL.

Gale and Hardwick have a lot to answer for. They are simply unable to keep their players in line.
Quote from: Neil Stewart
Kane is on the money. The Melbourne media is spineless in terms of how they report on the out of control off-field culture at Richmond.

The likes of McClure attack interstate clubs such as Adelaide for any slight transgression, but make excuse after excuse for Richmond.
Quote from: Neil Stewart
No rules or regulations for their players?

That would explain why Richmond’s culture is a MESS.
https://twitter.com/NeilStewartWC
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on May 12, 2021, 09:14:41 AM
Thinking Neil needs therapy over his Richmond obsession
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: wayne on May 12, 2021, 10:18:08 AM
Thinking Neil needs therapy over his Richmond obsession

Neil is a West Coast supporter right?  :lol
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: WilliamPowell on May 12, 2021, 01:05:12 PM
Thinking Neil needs therapy over his Richmond obsession

Neil is a West Coast supporter right?  :lol

 :lol

So Willie Rioli says hello and hold my ...beer  ;D
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 13, 2021, 08:46:41 PM
Quote from: WindyHillJets
Tiges prob want it classed a away game as they don't play outside of melb
Quote from: Peter Benei
Only if Tigers agree to Cats request to move Geelong home game v Tigers from MCG to Kardina Park
Quote from: James Hampton
I'm sure they will survive having to play somewhere other the G
Quote from: Kris D
I'm surprised Richmond even know where Marvel stadium is...
Quote from: Dylan
I mean, Adelaide had to play a “home” game at the MCG and Richmond didn’t mind that.
https://twitter.com/superfooty/status/1392738883264081921

Thinking Neil needs therapy over his Richmond obsession
He's still going  :wallywink.

Quote from: Neil Stewart
About time that McLachlan puts the petulant Hardwick in his place.
https://twitter.com/NeilStewartWC/status/1392698703622770688
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 14, 2021, 03:05:47 PM
https://indaily.com.au/sport/football/2021/05/14/afl-victorian-bias-true-or-false/

One such example would be following European soccer with the Champions League and US football with the Super Bowl by having Olympic-style bidding to host the AFL grand final outside Melbourne.

Colless noted the roadblocks former Sydney chief executive Andrew Ireland found in 2018 when he proposed the AFL grand final become a best-of-three series to afford fairness to non-Victorian clubs, such as Adelaide that lost the 2017 grand final to MCG tenant club Richmond.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 15, 2021, 03:18:22 AM
Quote from: Candice
Can someone at the @AFL tell me why Tigers/Saints gets prime time on the Friday and West Coast/Dogs gets shafted to the Sunday arvo? Someone remind me out of those 2 games that has already played which was the better one to view…? Certainly not the one in prime time. #VFL
https://twitter.com/candicespag/status/1393071786976186370

Quote from: Kane Cornes
Just give them all 22 on Friday night at the G
Quote from: Neil Stewart
If Richmond supporters such as Caroline Wilson get their way, and are successful in their lobbying for Brendan Gale to be the next AFL CEO, this may well happen.

The audacity and lack of self-awareness for Gale to even raise this as an issue. Unbelievable.
https://twitter.com/NeilStewartWC/status/1393204286067150857

Quote from: Neil Stewart
The increasingly subversive, petulant Richmond coach is a loose cannon for the AFL.

Him and his club can’t stop creating negative headlines for the league.
https://twitter.com/NeilStewartWC/status/1393059803300200450
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 15, 2021, 01:16:00 PM
Quote from: Liam
Why tf is West Coast Vs Bulldogs on a sunday arvo? That clash is the definition of a Friday night thriller. Richmond Vs StKilda is not friday night worthy, dare I say, Vic bias?
Quote from: Theo Dimou
Why the f*** have St. Kilda been given another Friday night? Or you couldn’t handle giving Richmond a Saturday or Sunday?
https://twitter.com/AFL/status/1393070623199399938
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: WilliamPowell on May 15, 2021, 01:18:55 PM
What i find funny about people sooking about who is getting the Friday night games is that currently with this pathetic floating fixture crap the TV networks are picking the games they want on Thursday and Friday nights  ::)

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 16, 2021, 06:45:14 AM
Jeremy Finlayson was caught sooking about the umps last night on twitter during the game.

(https://discourse.bomberblitz.com/uploads/default/original/3X/d/9/d98a4f029e97ac30e371c3e4328b24b14ed6b8dd.jpeg)

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on May 16, 2021, 09:49:29 AM
I figured there would be whinging about that goal.

Was clearly a goal IMO.

Umpire couldn't get any closer unless he was chewing the ball.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 16, 2021, 05:41:05 PM
Barrett and Cornes this morning on the Sunday Footy Show were sooking about Grimes not being penalised for that one-on-one contest with Toby Greene in the last minute.

Watch here: https://twitter.com/FootyonNine/status/1393720644160864257

When Lloyd replied that Greene wasn't watching the ball, Barrett tried to backtrack and say "oh some umpires would pay that a free against Grimes"  :wallywink.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 17, 2021, 03:25:52 AM
Quote from: X-man
I’ll say it before and I’ll say it again. Richmond are the luckiest side in the history of the game.
https://twitter.com/XTweeptweep01/status/1393538911578693634

Quote from: Jack
Breaking: Umps on pay role @ Richmond
Quote from: Jack
GWS vs Umps
Quote from: Jack
The Arc is a joke, no way was that a goal
Quote from: Jack
The Arc is a joke, they go to an umpires call when the umpire got fkin knocked over lmao. Pathetic
Quote from: Jack
Umps get Home in a Classic*
Quote from: Jack
Umps won you another game, what’s new
Quote from: Jack
Why exactly did the Arc go to the umpires call when they have clear footage of it being a non goal, while the umpire got tackled? Obviously rigged in favour of Richmond
Quote from: Jack
Umpires tonight handing Richmond the 4 points

(https://media.tenor.com/images/dfc2490655473d74f11c15e515ec0042/tenor.gif)
https://twitter.com/kyriegoatving

Quote from: Brad
The ARC needs a serious review. There is no way a goal line decision like that should end in an umpires call.
#AFLTigersGiants
https://twitter.com/Bradcmelb/status/1393541833305640967

Quote from: goyougoodthing
Did Richmond win the flag tonight? The carry on is a bit much yeah? An injury depleted GWS that’s been going pretty ordinary had their measure most of the night and should’ve won. Terrible winners #AFLTigersGiants
https://twitter.com/Cadders3/status/1393555138455896065

Quote from: King Toby
I’ll fight any Richmond supporter that claims they didn’t get extremely lucky tonight #AFLTigersGiants
Quote from: King Toby
We've been robbed
Quote from: King Toby
One of his ‘goals’ was from the front row of the crowd, but that’s cool.
https://twitter.com/dlesk18

Quote from: Neil Stewart
Hardwick is steadily forging a reputation as the least respected triple premiership coach of all time.

His team has been gifted SO MANY advantages, yet he still wants more. Completely detached from reality.
Quote from: Neil Stewart
AFL: In the interests of equalization, we must enforce the soft cap so the big clubs don’t gain an unfair advantage

Also AFL: Hey Richmond, here’s your fixture with eighteen MCG games
https://twitter.com/NeilStewartWC
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on May 17, 2021, 11:25:26 PM
Meth pipe's running hot in Portaderlaid tonight...

(https://i.imgur.com/4PYieMf.jpg)

 :shh




Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 18, 2021, 07:29:08 AM
Like father like son ...

Quote from: Graham Cornes
Sounds a touch precious Dimma. How much more of an advantage would you like?
https://twitter.com/Cornesy12/status/1393767947768786949

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Of course poor ol' obsessed Neil couldn't help himself either  :wallywink.

Quote from: Neil Stewart
Finally, everyone is suddenly noticing the precious, petty and pathetic comments and conduct of Gale and Hardwick.

AFL HQ needs to put its foot down IMMEDIATELY.
https://twitter.com/NeilStewartWC/status/1394282098127605762
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: lamington on May 18, 2021, 10:44:49 AM
Meth pipe's running hot in Portaderlaid tonight...

(https://i.imgur.com/4PYieMf.jpg)

 :shh

I guess he was asleep during the 2020 GF
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 19, 2021, 05:49:26 AM
Quote from: Wally Fradus
Richmond have had home ground advantages too good for too long. Spare a thought for Geelong who have been reamed in recent years, especially WRT finals.
Quote from: Anthony whellum
Life wasn't meant to be easy Dimmer.
Every AFL coach should be preaching to their side.
"Anytime, Anywhere"
Success has gone to Richmond's heads.
They were much more likeable when they were ordinary.
Quote from: Andrew
All of their barracker’s (not supporters) will jump off again when they start to lose games. The microwave sales will also go through the roof!
Quote from: John O'Donoghue
Kornes is right.Tiges are whingers and sooks.
In 2019 Tiges played their last 14 games including the Grand Final at the MCG.
Does that seem fair?
Quote from: Jimmy Mac
100%! So bloody precious. WA clubs travelling every second weekend and poor Dimma can’t handle going to the docklands. Such whingers!
https://twitter.com/FOXFOOTY/status/1394397370046058496


Quote from: The RealJarJar
#afltigersgiants Giants deserved to win that. Tigers looking absolutely crap this year
https://twitter.com/TheRealJarJar2/status/1393540133266198531

Quote from: TheRealJarJar
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E1b2fadVEAIMOs1?format=jpg&name=small)

2 simpletons and a cup. Enjoy your mediocrity
https://twitter.com/TheRealJarJar2/status/1393572818512535559

Quote from: The RealJarJar
No worries. We’ve had 3 of those ourselves (with far superior teams) & sustained success since the mid 80s. Good luck catching up
https://twitter.com/TheRealJarJar2/status/1393563669305315331
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: wayne on May 19, 2021, 09:55:52 AM
I'm guessing RealJarJar is a Borethorn supporter.

They better be ready for some pain, we've won 3 of the last 4, have better kids than the Hawks, and have 6 good picks in this draft.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tiger Khosh on May 19, 2021, 12:48:41 PM
I thought he was talking about the cats as hawks have won 5 in AFL era but then the cats wernt successful in the 80s  :huh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: wayne on May 19, 2021, 02:59:38 PM
You might be right

EDIT: yep, a Cats fan
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 20, 2021, 05:48:50 AM
Quote from: J.Stewart
A goal that should have been a point as went over the line. Dusty gives it away with his “poo that was lucky” smirk. When is the AFL going to stop protecting their favourites :facepalm.
Quote from: J.Stewart
Nah that was a behind for any other player Martin on the other hand
Quote from: J.Stewart
UR WRONG!!! Ur a 1 👁 Tiger & don’t C AFL neutral, I do Tiger. He even mouthed 2 his own “I don’t know if it was”. No change 2 ball direction from his quick kick over the line. I was there. The most protected AFL player in history with this, his high fend off, throws & holding the ball
Quote from: J.Stewart
Watch all of it buddy and it’s a point  :rollin but AFL most protected player in history can only get away with it  ;)
https://twitter.com/DSteward12345/status/1394919692649725953


Quote from: Matt Bottrell
Add to this the biased umpiring in the last 15 minutes of that game and it wasn’t something I wanted to watch. Richmond always get a good run when it matters in games.
Quote from: Lee
Only about four years too late ::)
Quote from: The Weekend Blues
Maybe if Lynch and Riewoldt didn’t stage so often they would get more free kicks
Quote from: SB
Shows the continual weakness of Jack to work hard to get a hard ball. Leaves it up to others to do the hard work! No respect!
Quote from: NewEra Bombers
Then they’re defenders blatantly dive when receiving little to no contact.......but you never report on that
Quote from: Matthew Passmore
Typical of Richmond
Quote from: Anthony
Tom Lynch again. What were we expecting from a thug.
Quote from: LeeLCats
::) AFL’s pampered child just doing their normal thing ...so what is daddy AFL going to do or say now? Nothing?
Quote from: Dave Kelland
Lynch Fined again!! .. didn’t he get fined the most times last year? Bloke needs a seat to actually learn..
Quote from: Damien Simic
Somehow Richmond fans will use the victim card here
Quote from: brodielindrea
how has fox footy just realised richmond are dirty. these man been doin it for 4 years now.
Quote from: Steve Roberts
Forward thugs, pathological Jack and antisocial Tom, fed by a 1% club thug Dusty and coached by the thug with a smile Harddick. When you lose your edge you resort to thuggery, just ask another world champion thug ear biter and rapist Iron Mike
Quote from: jake
Bunch of cheats. Cant wait for Mitch Robinson to show them what real aggression looks like on Friday night instead of throwing out cheap shots like big tough guy Lynch
https://twitter.com/FOXFOOTY/status/1394974231033692161
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: lamington on May 20, 2021, 12:35:50 PM
My favourite is that last comment from Jake. Lol at Mitch Robinson being the embodiment of real hardness
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 20, 2021, 02:04:38 PM
Quote from: REALLY
Why does this not get the media attention and response that it deserves.

This is downright ridiculous, sort of tactics you expect in a dirty streetfight, not a professional sport.

Please comment, share, post and shame the mongrels until it causes change.

GWS should take the thugs to court, and also be given the win that was stolen off them
Quote from: Saint
Dirty thugs as usual
Quote from: Chuckachan
The tigers need to play a cleaner brand of footy, otherwise they will further the stereotype that they’re a team of thugs.
Quote from: Anna
Lynch is a thug he should have got 1 match for that unnecessary bump, lucky that kid didn’t have concussion otherwise Lynch would have 4 weeks on the sidelines!
https://www.theroar.com.au/afl/video/thats-overs-tigers-under-fire-for-really-poor-off-ball-hits-on-young-giant-1128054/
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Chuck17 on May 20, 2021, 03:21:10 PM


Quote from: Chuckachan
The tigers need to play a cleaner brand of footy, otherwise they will further the stereotype that they’re a team of thugs.

My chinese brother
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on May 20, 2021, 03:31:15 PM
  :lol :shh


CGAF if everyone thinks we're thugs (and honestly CGAF if we are) - better than when they all thought we were soft -at the end of the day a club's job is to endear itself to it's own fanbase and impress them not the entire AFL fanbase... :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on May 20, 2021, 08:29:07 PM
Thuggier we are the better.

I remember Hawks beating the F out of North when the Roos thought they were hard. Lewis basically punched Goldstein in the face and Hodge just elbowed the crap out of Swallows head. Then they belted them by about 10 goals and the senior boys had a few weeks off before marching on to another flag.

Swallow looked sooky after the game and Hodge told him to harden the F up haha
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: JP Tiger on May 20, 2021, 10:18:40 PM
... and no team was a bigger bunch of thugs than our back to back premiership sides of 73 & 74!  It was an absolute privilege to watch them belt the stuffing out of all comers with no mercy or remorse!     ;D
I was about 30 yards away from the infamous Windy Hill brawl when we (to a man) decided to hand it out properly.  Now THAT was some proper Tiger Tough Stuff! 
Its a tough game (still) & always has been, to brand a side as thugs because somebody got pushed over is just childish. 
To be called thugs is something we are damn proud of, the top side is the top side because when they flex some muscle everybody backs off!     :gotigers
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 21, 2021, 03:07:55 AM
Quote from: Max Blake
Are @Richmond_FC okay with playing an interstate away game this week at the Gabba in Brisbane? Does Damian Hardwick hate going there too? #AFL
https://twitter.com/maxblake44/status/1394859685669265408

Quote from: Neil Stewart
In 2019 Richmond played 9 of their last 10 games including the premiership deciding game at the MCG.

The dream fixtures they have been given is the reason they are not as respected as other multi-premiership teams.
Quote from: Art Vandelay
Don’t forget the 2017 away qualifying final which they also played at home instead of in geelong
Quote from: kentank
Why not in Hobart or Launceston? Tigers and certain other Vic teams have it easy.
Quote from: fornuftiga
You played 2 interstate teams at your home ground. How is that not a massive advantage?
Quote from: Jon and 532 others
One West Coast premiership is worth 4 Richmond premierships
https://twitter.com/NeilStewartWC/status/1394847935884578819
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Fluffy Tiger on May 21, 2021, 03:03:57 PM
Such a dream draw we have had right?

(https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0025/9817/4778/files/Screenshot_2021-05-21_145732.png?v=1621573290)

After tonight we would of played 7 of the 8 other top 9 teams.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 23, 2021, 08:37:01 PM
Ch 7's official AFL twitter account trolling us.

Everyone who doesn't support Richmond:
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E2DUbG3UcAIy7_U?format=jpg&name=900x900)
https://twitter.com/7AFL/status/1396349519961284613
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 24, 2021, 07:10:03 PM
Quote from: Kerry Hoare
Hahahaha salty tigers what about the three hits on the beast? 🤔 or didn't your rose coloured glasses see those?
https://twitter.com/KerryHoare7/status/1396073545365483526

Quote from: Brett Maine
True. If the Eagles played at home as much as Richmond or Collingwood they would have won at least 10 premierships
Quote
https://twitter.com/picklington77/status/1396296552138698756
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 26, 2021, 08:42:15 PM
Quote from: floros_59
Win 3 flags and they think they can run the competition. 🤬🤡
https://twitter.com/floros_59/status/1397474661928112129

Re: Tom Lynch's injury:
Quote from: Stewie
Couldn’t have happened to a better bloke...
Quote from: potsoyi
Cantplayitis?
Quote from: Andrew Taylor
Won’t even notice him missing
Quote from: David
Isn’t that the bloke who jumped ship to get a premiership?
Quote from: Brian Smith
Busted a gut is stretching the truth by a long way.   He was a sulky poo who only gave them something if they were up and about.  Didn't deserve to go to Richmond. But he did.
Would see the real him at Saints or north
https://twitter.com/1116sen/status/1397430992562921472
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on May 26, 2021, 08:55:26 PM
Don't see anyone sooking about guys like Brian Lake, James Frawley, Jeremy Cameron etc all leaving to try for a flag
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 27, 2021, 06:33:28 PM
Quote from: 7afl
“Richmond are sitting ninth again. They don’t like it, but we love it” - Heath Shaw
Quote from: Jack James
Theyre the worst champions we've had in this sport for a long while. I respected the teams of Geelong and Hawthorn. I can't say I respect this team at all. They complain on AND off the field this year
https://twitter.com/7AFL/status/1396988155270631425

Quote from: 7afl
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E2JUzyhVEAAacdd?format=jpg&name=medium)
Quote from: Dee Jay North
They see the end coming like a freight train and the club and supporters really aren't handling it well at all.
Quote from: Matt Bottrell
Of course they are winging. They have been the golden child of the AFL for so long that they are amazed about anything that doesn’t go their way
Quote from: The sash
At the minute? It’s 24/7
Quote from: Nic
They are sooking, because they are back where they belong in ninthFace with tears of joy
Quote from: Rob Colace
Dimmer is now taken the lead from Clarko with Chris Scott third followed very closely  4th by Eddie and Koshie in the whinge, whinge poor me cup.
Quote from: Michael Lewis
give them a break, they had to travel all the way to marvel last week, they're still tired.
https://twitter.com/7AFL/status/1396776991295033346
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 28, 2021, 03:23:39 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E2bnPhbUcAQyN9g?format=jpg&name=medium)

Quote from: Ryan Wilson
Outside of 2017, Dusty plays about 7 good games a season. He’s laughably inconsistent but everyone chooses to ignore this for some reason
Quote from: Russ2468
How will we rate Dusty’s season if Richmond finish 9th? There’ll be no finals to beef it up…
Quote from: J.Stewart
Dusty great in finals but home and away his average at best
Quote from: Jack James
Agree. Dusty is a pinch hitter. Bontempelli makes things happen
Quote from: J.Stewart
No finals Dusty wouldn’t even be in a discussion and on @7AFL pages every day
Quote from: J.Stewart
No richmond built backs to back (they haven’t quite gotten the real dynasty yet) thanks to Trent Cotchin - no Trent no Richmond No Dusty
https://twitter.com/7AFL/status/1398059049967443968
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on May 28, 2021, 03:33:24 PM
If we make the 8 i reckon we will win the flag.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tiger Khosh on May 28, 2021, 03:50:56 PM
Someone post that meme again where people are deciding between dusty being overrated and Richmond being completely reliant on him depending on what better suits the narrative at the time....
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on May 28, 2021, 04:07:20 PM
Purely clickbait to accuse Dusty of being inconsistent over his career.

Disposals:
Year   Dusty    Bont
1st     20.2      15.9
2nd    22.1      21.1
3rd     22.4     24.4
4th     24.2     22.9
5th     25.5     24.1
6th     26.0     26.4
7th     31.1     20.8 (covid)
8th     29.8     26.6*
9th     25.4
10th   26.1
11th   20.7 (covid)
12th   23.3*

Goals:
Year   Dusty   Bont
1st      11       15
2nd     33       17
3rd      23       26
4th      23       20
5th      27       22
6th      24       15
7th       9        11 (covid)
8th      37       15*
9th      31
10th    32
11th    22 (covid)
12th     9*

Brownlow votes:
Year   Dusty   Bont
1st      6          4
2nd    12        13
3rd      5        20
4th     16       19
5th     13        9
6th     21       22
7th     25       10 (covid)
8th     36 (w)   ?
9th     19
10th   23
11th   15 (covid)
12th    ?

https://afltables.com/afl/stats/players/D/Dustin_Martin.html
https://afltables.com/afl/stats/players/M/Marcus_Bontempelli.html
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tiger Khosh on May 28, 2021, 07:26:08 PM
Hasn’t dusty finished top 5/10 in bnf every single season bar 1?

Also if bont has been so consistently great why have the doggies played in 1 finals series where they got bounce in the first match since their flag in 2016?
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on May 29, 2021, 01:25:11 AM
Hasn’t dusty finished top 5/10 in bnf every single season bar 1?

Also if bont has been so consistently great why have the doggies played in 1 finals series where they got bounce in the first match since their flag in 2016?

As every Richmond supporter knows the answer to your question is because Dusty has higher skill and committed teammates....nah his mates around him
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: MintOnLamb on May 29, 2021, 02:51:05 AM
It’s all fluff, the Bont is a special player though, gee he would be handy in Y an B
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 29, 2021, 01:03:00 PM
Quote from: proudsewerrat
Richmond have the worst fans in the AFL atm, they have the most whining, crybaby supporters existing in the world out of any sporting club period

Yeah even worse than Collingwood
https://twitter.com/acIIive/status/1398200000006418436

Quote from: Glen Edwards
I wonder if Hardwick likes playing at Giants Stadium. I am tipping he wouldn’t mind playing at Marvel this weekend. Karma!
@AFL
https://twitter.com/royslions/status/1397808405520084995

Quote from: Hodgey, the pizza lover
Jealous?

Why the stuff would we be jealous of a team that would whinge, bitch, pee and moan about how they "don't get enough games at the MCG?"  :rollin  :lol
https://twitter.com/AwesomeAntho91/status/1398111233140695040
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 30, 2021, 11:39:39 AM
Crows fan still sooking about the 2017 GF.


Quote from: CrowBloke
The one thing I cannot respect and will never respect are the grubby acts in packs, blatant holding-the-man, blocking, and obvious dump-your-opponent-after-disposal which have been coached into them and which they do as a team, game after game.
I'm not talking about "unsociable football", which Brisbane and Hawthorn also played in abundance for their three-peats. I can respect niggle and toughness.

Put most simply, if for free kicks your blokes are " ... last every year bar one, and I think we were like 15th that year as well " it's because of the way they play.

As a Richmond fan, you must know what I mean because it has definitely contributed to your success, and here's why:
Richmond 2017-21 do more deliberate illegal acts, especially holding in packs or when an Umpire is unsighted, than any other team I've seen in 50+ years of footy watching.
It's most definitely to their benefit.
If it's missed, play on, so their advantage from dirty play (classic example, 2017 GF eg Eddie held by both opponent's hands in the goalsquare, second quarter).
If it's punished, they benefit from the stoppage and have time to regroup/set up. The free kicks they give away deliberately are opposition momentum-stoppers.
It works!
If you doubt me, watch this but be warned, you will not like it:
--- 0.32, look at Lever being held down in the contest, closely, with Umpires' view obstructed.
and
--- 3.15, Betts being held in exactly the same way, different player. It's coached into them.
and ... and ... and ...

(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Bet9xIXVhdk/maxresdefault.jpg) (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bet9xIXVhdk)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bet9xIXVhdk
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/face-off-richmond-tigers-v-adelaide-crows-30-5-2021.1269667/post-70256008
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on May 30, 2021, 01:14:42 PM
That YouTube video is such a whinge. There's plenty of frees that could have been called (certainly would in this year) but most of them are crap about niggles and shoves.

It's a GF. You want the whistle thrown away a bit.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on May 30, 2021, 01:42:13 PM
Most of those incidents can be classified under "the bloke who made the video doesn't know the rules". Claiming Jacobs wasn't deliberate is laughable. Then again it isn't deliberate when their players do it at the Adelaide Oval in the last minute of a game  ::) so that might explain why dopey Crows fans sook when they rightfully get pinged outside SA.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on May 30, 2021, 04:51:03 PM
Most of those incidents can be classified under "the bloke who made the video doesn't know the rules". Claiming Jacobs wasn't deliberate is laughable. Then again it isn't deliberate when their players do it at the Adelaide Oval in the last minute of a game  ::) so that might explain why dopey Crows fans sook when they rightfully get pinged outside SA.

Yeah because Nank gave him the customary back shove heading to the line haha fmd
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 02, 2021, 03:33:07 PM
Quote from: Mark
So Port will have likely 6 obvious starting team players out for the game against Geelong

Nothing said from AFL media

Richmond, who don’t have 6 starting team players out, are apparently ravaged with injury and no form issues

You couldn’t make up the bias #afl
https://twitter.com/fantasy_things/status/1399314605722071043


Re: Jack's mark ...

Quote from: Ash
And the love affair of the AFL and Richmond continues. :facepalm
Quote from: Love & Squalor
Did Jack Riewoldt write this question?
https://twitter.com/AFL/status/1399622534929084424
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 03, 2021, 02:17:27 PM
Quote from: Neil Stewart
The Dreamtime game at Perth Stadium will be the biggest crowd Richmond has drawn this year.
https://twitter.com/NeilStewartWC/status/1400284901220392966

Quote from: Heath
Richmond supporters asking for comments to be disabled is a bit rich & precious...
They have to be the worst supporter base for online trolling going around Face with tears of joy
https://twitter.com/HeathLyons/status/1400003643433127937

Quote from: Adam Ant
Injury nightmare? Really? Rather mild compared to most other clubs ....
Quote from: TimothyJ
“Injury nightmare” almost every other team in the Comp has minimum 10 players on their injured list (and most have had 10 all year).... Tigers have 6. C’mon now 😅
Quote from: Gloveswashere
Looking like the tiges are going to miss the 3peat, they won’t be happy it leaves them they gotta get 3 in a row to be better than the hawks and the lions
https://twitter.com/AFL/status/1399886714340995072
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on June 03, 2021, 10:07:28 PM
I wonder if Neil is going to oir game?
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 04, 2021, 12:41:16 PM
Bomber fan on SEN just now:

Essendon have had more injuries than Richmond.
Umpires always favour Richmond.

 :wallywink
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Owl on June 04, 2021, 03:24:26 PM
Yeah Qanon just announced it, there is a conspiracy by the umps to get us over the line. it's all in the free kick stats.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 04, 2021, 04:26:30 PM
Tiger supporter has triggered Bomber fans on twitter thanks to Ch 7.  :snidegrin

Quote from: 7afl
This Richmond supporter puts a grain of rice in a jar for every day Essendon doesn’t win a final 🤭

Watch: https://twitter.com/i/status/1400605125383659520

Replies:
Quote from: Amy Polak
Put one in every time Dusty does a high fend off and doesn’t get a free against. I’ll wait!
Quote from: John
Probably just started following richmond in 2017
Quote from: Batch
Bombers will win another before the Tigs .
Quote from: 4th and Long Radio LLC
Dons winning the premiership within 5 years
Quote from: Waz
Richmond were the laughing stock of the AFL for over 30 years... think old mate has a very short memory 🤫🤐
Quote from: Paul
The thing that still gets me is how quickly (after years of being poo), they got so arrogant.
Quote from: Rachel Danderfield
I thought nothing could be sadder than Essendon not winning a final for 17 years.

Turns out there is.
Quote from: DanieltheGaffer
I was thinking the same thing. When Richmond were down in the dumps they were rattling tins to save there skins and the supporters are notorious for spitting on there coach when things take a turn for the worse
Quote from: Kate Bartlett
Yes, exactly. They where what, ninth for how many years?? There arrogance is quite astounding to be honest!
https://twitter.com/7AFL/status/1400605125383659520

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on June 04, 2021, 05:11:33 PM
Essendon the most disgraced club in Australian sporting history for cheating. There supporters should shut up.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Hard Roar Tiger on June 04, 2021, 06:33:30 PM
Essendon need to stop thinking that they’re relevant to the AFL
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 04, 2021, 07:02:36 PM
Replies to the best modern dynasty question:

Quote from: Mark Avenski
:lol why are Richmond in this conversation?
Quote from: Grant
Definitely not the tigers they are the worst by a huge margin.
Quote from: Grant
Truth hurts princess. You are nowhere the class of these other 3 sides. Barely any of your players would get a game with these sides during there reigns.

Quote from: Glenn Wright
How many richmond players start in that brisbane side?
Quote from: Grant
Dusty and rance maybe one or two others but that’s it.
Quote from: michael brook
Only dusty very good point
Quote from: Glenn Wright"
They would obviously squeeze a few on pine but in starting 18 would lucky to be more than 3 position for position swap
https://twitter.com/superfooty/status/1400705901590302724
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: MintOnLamb on June 04, 2021, 07:26:27 PM
Well I think the Bombers were hard done by, they were coerced into admitting a non provable crime.
What a disgrace by the AFL. In reality there were at least another 3 teams who could have been accused of the same.

James Hird has been an amazing player/ambassador for Essendon.

A disgrace how the bombers have FHO.

Good luck to them this weekend.

Unfortunately for them I believe we will prevail as, while their team has some positives, their supporters are scum at best.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on June 04, 2021, 07:54:35 PM
Essendon were not hard done by. They were found guilty by a international tribunal. GUILTY. 100% GUILTY
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tiger Khosh on June 04, 2021, 08:31:24 PM
Bombers hard done by? The players yes, the administration absolutely not.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on June 04, 2021, 09:57:10 PM
Well I think the Bombers were hard done by, they were coerced into admitting a non provable crime.
What a disgrace by the AFL. In reality there were at least another 3 teams who could have been accused of the same.

James Hird has been an amazing player/ambassador for Essendon.

A disgrace how the bombers have FHO.

Good luck to them this weekend.

Unfortunately for them I believe we will prevail as, while their team has some positives, their supporters are scum at best.

Agree to disagree on this.

Found guilty of administering banned thymosin variant.

Lack of evidence is only because they destroyed it to plead innocent by ignorance.

What would the point in a cutting edge supplements program be if you didn't even know what you gave your players/what was working vs not working?

Not to mention how ridiculous it is to suggest any AFL club wouldn't know what it's giving to it's players. Laughable.

They are 100% guilty and still to this day carry on about how nothing could be proven etc.

Looks like crap, smells like crap, feels like crap, sounds like crap...you don't have to shove it in your mouth and taste it too!
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Chuck17 on June 04, 2021, 10:03:51 PM
Whatever it takes

Says it all
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 06, 2021, 12:51:21 AM
Bomberblitz reacting to the last 10 minutes of the game :lol.

Quote from: Stallion
Just **** off Richmond, seriously go **** yourselves you ****** inbreds.
Quote from: handypoint
We play honest footy, Richmond this ridiculous surge football which works when umps don’t really pay sensible kicks.
Quote from: Michael_Long_Legend
So sick of losing to these ducking ■■■■■■ and getting done by the umps against them.

And we finds new way to lose against them every time. ■■■■ off.
Quote from: Stallion
Wanker club, inbreds
Quote from: Quark
I’m just tired of losing to these mongrels year in, year out mate. They’ve shaken us off with ease.
Quote from: Scotty21
■■■■ off Richmond
https://discourse.bomberblitz.com/t/dreamtime-game-thread-vs-richmond-year-tbc/22691/3037
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tiger Khosh on June 06, 2021, 01:01:36 AM
They do realise they are trying to imitate our game style? Should call themselves Richmond-lite.....
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 06, 2021, 06:44:15 AM
Quote from: Aaron Meadows
Umpires helped with 5 goals. Also late late goals in first 3 quarters

nb. this is a fake account that's really an Essendon supporter pretending to be a Tigers fan.
Quote from: Honest Richmond Fan

It was a RIGGED game. The AFL clearly had an agenda tonight, and they got what they wanted. Someone on the Bombers better call them out on this. Take a fine, so that next time, the game is called FAIRLY. Bombers got screwed, plain and simple. Coming from an honest tigers fan btw.
https://twitter.com/7AFL/status/1401151151681146883
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 06, 2021, 04:40:30 PM
Quote from: Mr TV Australia
Change it up Have #Dreamtime with Eagles or Dockers vs somebody?

Yes agree it won't happen, but tonight's crowd at @OptusStadium is an INSANE result!
https://twitter.com/MrTVAus/status/1401152706476089344

Quote from: Adam Seeary
Cotchin is a try hard nobody. Brownlow stealing nobody.
Quote from: Adam Seeary
I can’t wait till the Tigers are poo again #AFLDonsTigers
Quote from: Adam Seeary
Wait till Brownlow night... D.Martin... 3 votes 🗳 for doing nothing
https://twitter.com/adamseeary





Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 07, 2021, 05:09:22 AM
Quote from: Richard Hinds
Happy to play 3500km west of the MCG. But not 3.5km west of the MCG.
https://twitter.com/rdhinds/status/1401455851768934405

Quote from: Neil Stewart
The AFL completely tailor the fixture to what suits Richmond? Nooo, that would NEVER happen!
https://twitter.com/agerealfooty/status/1400737444773859337

Quote from: Janice Matthey
Yep. Dogs supporter here, f****** sick to death of Richmond.
Quote from: SmitxPenn
I dont mind Richmond making finals, but there fans became so cocky and arrogant after the 2017 final win
Quote from: stephen
Obviously the AFL and the umpires do. This is disgraceful umpiring. Cheating at it’s best.
Quote from: justmyopinion
It’s the free kicks that aren’t being paid against Richmond that help them win. They don’t get penalised, so they rush the ball forward and score. Unfair advantage!
https://twitter.com/swandane/status/1401148286782693377

Quote from: Reverend Sasquatch
Not as important as this guy!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E3HsF-aVIAgPRpB?format=jpg&name=small)
https://twitter.com/PastorRegular/status/1401160554652127235

Quote from: Francesco
Boo-feckin-hoo. They play 17 of 22 H&A games a year in and around Melbourne, but sure, let’s hero-worship them for hopping on a plane two weeks in a row. 🙄
Quote from: Chalkie1985
Oh the poor babies. My heart bleeds, the big sooks, why do g you give them a three goal start for the pain and suffering?
Quote from: AnnieJ
This comment proves that the Vics have no idea about gruelling travel schedules. Flushed faceWoman facepalming
https://twitter.com/AFLcomau/status/1401340537131528192
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 07, 2021, 02:47:43 PM
Cornes' obsession with us continues even when the story isn't about us  ::).

“Dustin Martin leaves for New Zealand. He’s walking through the airport with his mask underneath his nose, this is on the primetime news services all over the country,” Cornes told SEN SA Breakfast.

“Do you think anyone said anything? Do you think one person from the AFL was watching that footage of Dustin Martin going, ‘He didn’t have his mask on correctly, let’s send a memo out to the players that whenever they’re travelling, they have to wear their mask correctly’.


https://www.sen.com.au/news/2021/06/07/cornes-calls-out-double-standards-after-crows-hefty-fine-for-covid-breach/
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 07, 2021, 06:48:26 PM
Quote from: Finding_Nino
f*** i hate losing to them they are laughing at us for capitulating

Quote from: Touchedontheline
Richmond supporters always use this [ed. free kick differential]. It’s what they get away with is the issue, their players infringe so frequently and much of the time it goes unpunished. And they frequently get dubious free kicks in good spots, at crucial times.
https://discourse.bomberblitz.com/t/review-thread-v-richmond-dreamtime-2021/22703/1025
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 08, 2021, 04:34:11 AM
Quote from: cyrilicioushawk
Seriously Richmond? Come on you’re surely better than that. At least join a team like Carlton and help them ride. There’s no gratification joining a powerhouse for a cheap premiership
Quote from: Cameron Hamilton
What type of salary cap are they running at Richmond?

https://twitter.com/FOXFOOTY/status/1401853132309614599
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: cub on June 08, 2021, 08:05:41 AM
Well I think the Bombers were hard done by, they were coerced into admitting a non provable crime.
What a disgrace by the AFL. In reality there were at least another 3 teams who could have been accused of the same.

James Hird has been an amazing player/ambassador for Essendon.

A disgrace how the bombers have FHO.

Good luck to them this weekend.

Unfortunately for them I believe we will prevail as, while their team has some positives, their supporters are scum at best.

Agree to disagree on this.

Found guilty of administering banned thymosin variant.

Lack of evidence is only because they destroyed it to plead innocent by ignorance.

What would the point in a cutting edge supplements program be if you didn't even know what you gave your players/what was working vs not working?

Not to mention how ridiculous it is to suggest any AFL club wouldn't know what it's giving to it's players. Laughable.

They are 100% guilty and still to this day carry on about how nothing could be proven etc.

Looks like crap, smells like crap, feels like crap, sounds like crap...you don't have to shove it in your mouth and taste it too!
If I was asked to stick some unknown drug in me I would of said no!
On as side note West Coast have shot to#1 with a bullet in the biggest sooks state, delusional supporters at best!
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 08, 2021, 03:48:59 PM
Quote from: Neil Stewart
It was bizarre they were scheduled to play here post bye in the first place - another example of the AFL making the fixture as friendly as possible for them.

Obvious that the league doesn’t have confidence that Richmond can manage player behaviour with a weekend off interstate.
Quote from: Neil Stewart
The AFL completely tailor the fixture to what suits Richmond? Nooo, that would NEVER happen!
https://twitter.com/NeilStewartWC
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 08, 2021, 06:23:02 PM
Quote from: Footy Head
"Surely a player of his caliber can’t go to a team like Richmond.

@AFL I know you love Richmond but this can not happen.
Quote from: #MFFL
If he bails to Richmond they will become the Richmond Glory Hunters. They have the respect of the public bar Tom Lynch, but they'll lose it very quickly
Quote from: Keegan Carr
Tom how can Richmond possibly fit him under the cap
https://twitter.com/tommorris32/status/1401857605211852808
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on June 08, 2021, 10:19:22 PM
How can we fit him in the cap? Have they heard?

Richmond is a crap team bar Dusty. All role players, remember? Therefore we should have cap space!
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 10, 2021, 03:55:28 AM
Quote from: hamb #KC
Quote from: AFL
A seven-year high as the TV ratings for the 2021 Sir Doug Nicholls Round are in 📺
would’ve been higher if richmond lost
https://twitter.com/HambSandwich/status/1402176112675880960

Quote from: Paddy
Quote from: Bob Murphy
If you’re @AFL team, from round 12, was a BRUCE SPRINGSTEEN song, what would it be?
Richmond's would have to be "We Take Care of Our Own" given that Dimma apparently gave Martin and Bolton more coaches votes than Parish
https://twitter.com/paddybraden/status/1402044139252838402

Quote from: Nick R
Quote from: pocketrockitfitness
Quote from: West Coast Eagles
The West Coast Eagles can confirm their clash with Richmond scheduled for round 14 has been brought forward to next Sunday, June 13.
Not happy at all ! Terrible time
But it's great for the Richmond supporters locked down in Melbourne with nothing to do on a public holiday Sunday night. So, I mean, yeah, no #vicbias at all here.
https://mobile.twitter.com/NickoRocks/status/1401429994652389378
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 15, 2021, 05:15:24 AM
Quote from: Nathan
That last 10 minutes was the Richmond so many of us knew and loved for decades. Giving up a 4 goal lead in the dying minutes. Geez they were the  good old days (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f60f.png)
#AFLEaglesTigers
https://twitter.com/docklandsnate/status/1404057590984626187
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 15, 2021, 06:51:33 PM
Quote from: Suzanne Olsen
Everyone has found richmond out
Quote from: Tim McGrath
Quote from: Vlad Klaric
[Season] Over
(https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f91e.png)(https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f91e.png)(https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f91e.png)(https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f91e.png)
https://twitter.com/FootyonNine/status/1404607337420050432


Quote from: AFL
Can Richmond still win the flag?
Quote from: Matt Bottrell
Hope not, sick of the umps golden boys
Quote from: Matt Bottrell
Number of frees tells nothing. It doesn’t show the frees that weren’t payed or where on the ground the frees were paid. Richmond should give away a lot of frees because of the style they play. Richmond always get frees when it counts
https://twitter.com/AFL/status/1404357458655539205
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Fluffy Tiger on June 15, 2021, 11:03:29 PM
Reading some of these realy reminds me of one of my favourite sayings.

"Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.”
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on June 16, 2021, 04:58:02 AM
 :lol
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 16, 2021, 06:32:40 AM
Quote from: GoEaglesGoSGIO
A honest opinion here but I really believe there are 2 sides out there who literally throw the ball more then they handball. Its at the level where if a umpire pulled them up on this anomaly we would be looking at 40+ free kicks in a given contest. The two teams are

Richmond - Worst of the lot for sure. I dont think Kamdyn McIntosh has ever handballed the ball in his entire career. Every single one is a clear and obvious throw. His handballing technique is extremely similar to Valentime Homes passing technique I find. He puts his fist near the ball and then unleashes a NRL level spiralling bullet pass. I actually think it was a less of a issue last night than normal and they did alot more tap ons and clearer handballs due to the defensive pressure but in general they for the 120 handballs last night 20 were clear throws

Sydney - Second worst for sure. Callum Mills a expert in it from there side. Josh Kennedy been the birth of it overall though. He would be the worst in the AFL with that throw where he gets his hands above the contest and throws the ball down and over the contest. Its been 10+ years for them. Developed by Paul Roos and continued by Longmire

A small honorable mention to Geelong but im being harsh there. I tend to feel like they were the team who got pinged for it and have had to cut it out over the years so kudos on them for removing it from there game
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/sides-that-constantly-throw-the-ball.1272593/

Quote from: Neil Stewart
Would be a huge embarrassment for a full strength, all conquering Tigers team (who for the 2nd year running have lobbied to have this specific match re-fixtured to suit their exact preferences) if they were to lose to the severely injured ravaged Eagles.

Reputation on the line.
Quote from: Neil Stewart
What a blow for Richmond.

Had the AFL re-fixture this game for the second year in a row, and still got beaten by the injury ravaged WAFL Eagles.
Quote from: Neil Stewart
Shuey. McGovern. Kelly.

3 of the Eagles best 5 players weren’t playing.

Embarrassing loss for Richmond.
Quote from: Neil Stewart
Quote from: Jacob Landsmeer
Remarkable that West Coast and Richmond haven’t played twice in a home and away season since 2009. Two massive clubs that draw an audience every time they play and play out belters like last night. AFL should lock in two #AFLEaglesTigers matches for the foreseeable future.
To say it defies logic would be an understatement.

Can only assume it is at Richmond’s request.
Quote from: Neil Stewart
Why didn’t Gerard and Robbo ask him [Riewoldt] about the epic game he just played in, instead of discussing irrelevant trivial nonsense like this?
https://twitter.com/NeilStewartWC
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on June 16, 2021, 09:46:13 AM
Welcome back Neil. Missed your opinions
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 17, 2021, 04:52:27 PM
Quote from: kirwah
Covid [2020 flag] one didnt count anyway
Quote from: my name is David
I rally hope they fall flat on their pumped up arrogant heads. Worst of luck to ya boys. Hope it hurts
https://twitter.com/7AFL/status/1405362978354982912
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 17, 2021, 08:35:34 PM
Quote from: J.Stewart
For AFL players Daniel Rioli and Dustin Martin who have been spotted in Sydney last night/tonight, can they come back before training commences next week? @TomBrowne7 will the government and AFL give them an exemption?
https://twitter.com/7NewsMelbourne/status/1405441341333508098
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: WilliamPowell on June 18, 2021, 07:36:05 AM
Quote from: J.Stewart
For AFL players Daniel Rioli and Dustin Martin who have been spotted in Sydney last night/tonight, can they come back before training commences next week? @TomBrowne7 will the government and AFL give them an exemption?
https://twitter.com/7NewsMelbourne/status/1405441341333508098

Ridiculous tweet!

Why would they need an exemption when purchasing borders are not closed to NSW?

All they will be required to do under the rules is get a test as soon as they get back to Melb and isolate until they get their negative result.... 3 suburbs in greater Sydney are orange zones

Nice try J. Stewart, you imbecile
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 19, 2021, 11:26:21 PM
Quote from: Bruzzy the Bull
Mason Cox stopping a Richmond 4peat is the reason why I don’t think he deserves to be traded
Quote from: Alex_Ness2003
You say that like West Coast wouldn't of beaten Richmond in the grand final
Quote from: Bruzzy the Bull
Nah Tigers were never getting past WC
Quote from: Alex_Ness2003
exactly, we would've flogged them. If Richmond couldn't beat Collingwood what makes everyone think Richmond would've flogged us
https://twitter.com/bruzzyyyyy/status/1405368963232530434

Quote from: Amit verna
Wont be surprised if tigers play all their games now at MCG (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f602.png) (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f602.png)
Quote from: Zac
Yeah could happen knowing how much the AFL loves Richmond
https://twitter.com/cricket_freakkk/status/1406083682335481861
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 20, 2021, 05:55:05 AM
(https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/attachments/1624108436942-png.1159162/)

Quote from: Micky Thornhill
usually coincides with your 15 game consecutive run of home games at the MCG doesn't it 😉
Quote from: Lewi Allan
don’t be crappy cause the Tiges two seconds of fame is done and dusted pal xx embrace a great game.
Quote from: James Burgess
you be waiting another 42 years now bunch mcg spoon feed cry baby’s back to 9th you go 😂😂
Quote from: James Burgess
I am saying 3 flags In 42 years for mcg spoon feed team 👏👏👏
Quote from: Troy Jackson
fine I'll give you 1 of the 3. At least that was a completely neutral grand final unlike your others. That's why west coasts prem will always be worth more than any 1 of Richmond's latest 3.
Quote from: Shanyn Kearney
most Richmond supporters have only been supporting since 2017
https://www.facebook.com/www.aflmemesofficial.com.au/posts/2888063038119198
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 21, 2021, 01:01:41 PM
Quote from: RoOSTA-Coach
Some wannabes call this bloke "Kmart Dusty"...

Can sum1 tell me the last time Dusty kicked 4 goals, had 7 tackles, 29 touches, 3 marks, 6 clearances, 10 ins.50s in an injury riddled midfield?

Yeah, didn't think so.
Quote from: RoOSTA-Coach
Finding this hilarious how much this tweet has peeed off Tigers fans. For context, was specifically referring to Short after his smart arse comments on radio about Dusty kicking 2 late goals and not being awarded the Yioken medal ahead of Parish. But keep sniffing, this is fun!
Quote from: RoOSTA-Coach
Those offended by my tweet above are:
1) People who called Stringer "Kmart Dusty" and dont like seeing him perform well, or
2) People who honestly believed the tweet has compared Dusty's entire career to 1 Stringer game.

Lets focus on 2021 output as a start? Banter away!
https://twitter.com/Ro0STA/status/1406523875077148674
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on June 21, 2021, 04:14:15 PM
RoOSTA would be the only one to select Stringer before Martin as either a forward or midfielder.

2021 Martin v 2021 Stringer is incomparable. 12 games v 9 doesn't help the comparison.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: lamington on June 21, 2021, 09:20:36 PM
Stringer, de goey, robinson are all home brand Dusty. Petracca probably the only one who is worth entertaining the debate but being good for 2 seasons doesn’t mean he’s dethroned Dusty
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Damo on June 21, 2021, 09:45:07 PM
Robinson????

He isn’t good enough to be home brand of Stringer and DeGoey , let alone home brand Dusty
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 22, 2021, 02:18:30 PM
Just for the deluded Bomber fan above:

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E4aFDfoVgAMr_v4?format=jpg&name=large)
https://twitter.com/Jpana75/status/1406958243428007938
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on June 22, 2021, 02:56:56 PM
Hahahahahaha

Bloke turns up for about 2-3 games a year.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 23, 2021, 04:42:20 PM
Opposition supporters equating Cotch to Selwood :huh3.

Quote from: ally
Can I just say that Pendles may not be a 3 time premiership player but he’s a better person, footballer and leader than Selwood and Cotchin combined. What Selwood did last night was  :chuck :chuck and people still think he’s a great leader spare me
Quote from: ally
Cotchin did some dirty poo last year too, he’s not as bad as Selwood but Pendles would never.
Quote from: Phil Devlin
Cotchin no cleanskin either.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E4PsyDuUUAIglwu?format=jpg&name=medium)(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E4PsyQKVoAI-oO0?format=jpg&name=medium)
Quote from: Steph
There have been more then a couple of times on field where Cotchin has done things that don’t look too good. Are we forgetting the time he eye gouged a player?
Quote from: Gary Small
Pendles is just class - Selwood, Cotchin et al disappointingly resort to scrum tactics and let themselves down.
https://twitter.com/allllly____/status/1406202510159728648
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 24, 2021, 04:20:36 AM
Quote from: CamaroCharlie
Quote from: 7news Melbourne
@Richmond_FC can again lay claims as the biggest club in the land after smashing its membership record.
Give us the figures without the gimmick 3 game & pet memberships…
https://twitter.com/7NewsMelbourne/status/1407622497600606208

Quote from: BotsMaster
Could have sworn Richmond were the only team to have injuries (https://images.bigfootymedia.com/smilies/thinking.png)

(https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/attachments/fb_img_1624348760184-jpg.1161237/)
Quote from: Strange Cat
They love bleating how hard done by they are (https://twemoji.maxcdn.com/2/72x72/1f644.png)
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/non-geelong-football-afl-discussion-2021.1253928/page-235#post-70702116
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: WilliamPowell on June 24, 2021, 07:24:41 AM
CamaroCharlie really is clueless

Clearly isn't aware that...

Pet Memberships are not included never have been by any Club

3 game memberships are sold by ALL clubs and are counted in EVERY clubs official membership tally

And the numbers are per the AFLs criteria of what constitutes a membership

Hence, why they don't recognise the Eagles and Crows "digital" memberships in those clubs tallies
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 25, 2021, 05:56:25 AM
Quote from: Lord McBain
Yea it is… the cats have no reason to be jealous of Bitchmond though
https://twitter.com/LordMcBain/status/1407855486850899971
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 26, 2021, 06:36:56 AM
Quote from: 7AFL
Can Richmond win the premiership this season?
https://twitter.com/7AFL/status/1408394836772737024

Quote from: Grant
Richmond won’t make the finals little own the premiership. We will see Richmond in 30 years 😂😂
Quote from: Grant
Get the microwaves ready.
Quote from: Benjamin
The nightclub incident must have caused Tigers some loss of focus.
Quote from: aussietrump
Get the microwaves ready.


Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 26, 2021, 07:18:48 PM
Quote from: Melbourne Cricket Ground
Tonight's attendance is 14,787. #AFLTigersSaints
Quote from: Elisa
Over 100k members though right?
Quote from: Jarrod MacCulloch
Too far to travel for the tigers supporters
Quote from: Donna
Bandwagon fans have dropped off
Quote from: Glen Edwards
Cats should play them at the Cattery
Quote from: Shaun Curnow
"The MCG has got soul. It's got Richmond people there. So if you want big crowds, play our home games at the 'G."
Quote from: 'Marshall"
But but but, they have 103,000 Members...
Quote from: Clinton Mitchell
No reason why then the AFL can’t move the Geelong v Richmond game to Geelong
https://twitter.com/MCG/status/1408397547190710283
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 27, 2021, 04:28:37 AM
Quote from: Gary O'Donnell
Didn’t expect the ‘Tigers of old’ tonight
Quote from: Looch
I do love the tigers of old alot more than the tigers of 2017 19 and 20
Quote from: John Portelli
Hopefully they finished ninth for the next 20 years
Quote from: Batch
They are chasing down 9th like nobody’s business
Quote from: daniel
9th spot on the ladder beckons (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f602.png)
https://twitter.com/GaryODonnell10/status/1408403599781097473
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 28, 2021, 06:46:49 AM
Quote from: CrowFan77
At the end of every AFL season a number of medals are presented. IMHO there have been a number of undeserving medalists over the years. Here are my thoughts:

- 2017 Premiership Medals - Cotchin and Ellis - both should have been suspended for the GF - not that it would have made a difference to the result! We sacked!

- 2017 Norm Smith Medal - Dusty was good but Bachar Houli was BOG by a mile.

- 2012 Brownlow - Cotchin and Mitchell - consolation prize after Jobe was stripped of the medal. Should have been awarded to Scott Thompson.
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/undeserved-medalists.1274500/
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on June 28, 2021, 08:45:38 AM
Lol bit of a theme there

How about brownlows to Priddis, Mitchell and Fyfe (2nd)?
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on June 28, 2021, 01:12:46 PM
"CrowFan77".....'nuff said... :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 29, 2021, 06:37:17 PM
Quote from: Neil Stewart
Richmond’s lowest score at the G for almost 100 years?

The abhorrent off-field culture at this club has permeated on-field.

Was inevitable.
Quote from: Neil Stewart
Second consecutive pitiful, embarrassing loss in a row for the extremely overrated, Dusty’s coattail riding, favorable-fixture Tigers.

Looks like the AFL assisted flag run is over.
Quote from: Neil Stewart
Off-field cultural issues will eventually take a toll on on-field performance.

This fall off a cliff decline has been many months/years in the making.
Quote from: Neil Stewart
Tough break. Wouldn’t want to lose our last remaining non MCG game vs the comp’s basket case. Maybe we can get the league to refixture it.
https://twitter.com/NeilStewartWC
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: wayne on June 29, 2021, 06:39:23 PM
Still punching on while West Coasts window slams shut too. Neil is a goer  :lol
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on July 03, 2021, 06:49:23 AM
Quote from: alpha_z
Yeah must be all that travelling from the MCG to marvel stadium, thoughts and prayers to all at Richmond.
Quote from: joshua.quinn6
I’d throw in the towel when you lose to a team that lost to Norf
Quote from: obiechambers
At this rate the tigers would rather play in QLD to get a win
Quote from: bombus1
Not far off 9th…where you belong.
Quote from: zmcg_032
Richmond is done. Your "loyal" supporters have abandoned you. Can't play all your games at the MCG mate, your not that special. Can't wait to see you guys in the bottom 8 again.
Quote from: boshd
Must be the massive amount of travel you had to do. Duck off Richmond
Quote from: ttocs7626
Would’ve needed a raincoat getting to the bench last night if the crowds were there. They’d be spitting on him again like 2016.
Quote from: haha.memes.69
Send Richmond to Tasmania!!
https://www.instagram.com/7afl/
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on July 03, 2021, 06:55:40 AM
“Guess we’re gonna need another 10-year plan…” #AFLSunsTigers
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E5NXerYUYAYQf3v?format=png&name=900x900)
https://twitter.com/sportsbetcomau/status/1410567711059447812

Is nature healing? Are Richmond headed for a 9th place finish? Market here:
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E5QZSRFVgAUmte1?format=jpg&name=900x900)
https://twitter.com/sportsbetcomau/status/1410780552186142720

Richmond fans reading all the jokes about them atm after winning 3 flags in 4 years...
(https://media.tenor.com/images/eb82c6bc6b58893f7a43acb1ca232b27/tenor.gif)
https://twitter.com/sportsbetcomau/status/1410803169542787082
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Damo on July 03, 2021, 07:36:53 AM
The last one isn’t taking the pee out of us
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: wayne on July 03, 2021, 12:34:46 PM
I'd take another 3 flags in 4 years 10 year plan... as would 17 other sides??
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on July 03, 2021, 12:41:21 PM
Our plan should be to win another 3 flags from 2022 to 2030. We also need to invest in stealing the bayside suburbs from St Kilda with a proper program aimed at generating supporter numbers from Port Melbourne going all the way to Portsea. St Kilda is an easy target. Never been successful. Our colors, the Tiger symbol and the song can attract kids from their over the next 20 years.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on July 03, 2021, 06:31:35 PM
The last one isn’t taking the pee out of us
You're right Damo. Just threw it in there as I liked it as a pro-Richmond meme following all the anti-Richmond ones :thumbsup.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: wayne on July 04, 2021, 02:19:13 PM
Quote from: Neil Stewart
Richmond’s lowest score at the G for almost 100 years?

The abhorrent off-field culture at this club has permeated on-field.

Was inevitable.
Quote from: Neil Stewart
Second consecutive pitiful, embarrassing loss in a row for the extremely overrated, Dusty’s coattail riding, favorable-fixture Tigers.

Looks like the AFL assisted flag run is over.
Quote from: Neil Stewart
Off-field cultural issues will eventually take a toll on on-field performance.

This fall off a cliff decline has been many months/years in the making.
Quote from: Neil Stewart
Tough break. Wouldn’t want to lose our last remaining non MCG game vs the comp’s basket case. Maybe we can get the league to refixture it.
https://twitter.com/NeilStewartWC

I wonder how Neil is feeling at the moment  :snidegrin Go swannies
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on July 06, 2021, 06:47:30 AM
Quote from: Neil Stewart
Astonishingly petty of the Richmond coach to blacklist the radio station that Wilson (arguably the club’s chief public defender and number one PR rep) is employed by.

Of all the ways to implode.

Bear witness to the downfall of the egomaniacal Richmond Tigers.
Quote from: Neil Stewart
More likely they finish ninth and Mario is nuking his membership card again
Quote from: Neil Stewart
Not to mention WC belted Richmond when they played each other in 18
Quote from: Neil Stewart
Of course it’s a comparison.

AFL and NBA are worlds apart.

Bulls didn’t have a fraction of the advantages the Tigers have had, and Tigers haven’t even had half the success.

Both did entirely base their success on having one dominant, all time great player though.
https://twitter.com/NeilStewartWC/
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Eat_em_Alive on July 06, 2021, 10:14:24 AM
Quote from: Neil Stewart
Astonishingly petty of the Richmond coach to blacklist the radio station that Wilson (arguably the club’s chief public defender and number one PR rep) is employed by.

Of all the ways to implode.

Bear witness to the downfall of the egomaniacal Richmond Tigers.
Quote from: Neil Stewart
More likely they finish ninth and Mario is nuking his membership card again
Quote from: Neil Stewart
Not to mention WC belted Richmond when they played each other in 18
Quote from: Neil Stewart
Of course it’s a comparison.

AFL and NBA are worlds apart.

Bulls didn’t have a fraction of the advantages the Tigers have had, and Tigers haven’t even had half the success.

Both did entirely base their success on having one dominant, all time great player though.
https://twitter.com/NeilStewartWC/

What a sad and pathetic way to live an existence
I feel compassion and empathy for this man
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on July 06, 2021, 03:45:28 PM
Yes he really needs a lot of help
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on July 08, 2021, 02:17:18 AM
Quote from: VerS
Contrary to what Tiger nuffies think, I have to reiterate what the whole league thinks; He [Dusty] is NOT the GOAT.

Sure he's probably one of the best finishers in the league, but he loves sits on the outside of the contest waiting for the easy ball. Effort in the contest is what separates him from players like Fyfe, Danger, Judd, GAJ etc. Having 3 Norm Smiths doesn't mean anything when everyone knows at least 1 of them were gifted. You need to accept the fact that being covered in tatts, having an army of bandwagons along with that funny haircut is literally one of the main reasons he stands out and has been gifted most of those accolades. He is nothing more than a decent mid 95% of the time.

How can a player that only turns up one month of the year be even considered in this convo??
Quote from: CarltonBlooz
The funniest part is he goes missing for 99% of the season, ah Tugger flogs, never change.

sHut uP u caRlton suPPorter fLOG u are terrible

Also lmao at the tugger flogs defending Dusty like he's their own child it gets better day by day, comedy gold.

Thankfully he'll fade into obscurity like Richmond in the coming years, thank god when that happens.

All that will remain will be

heartburn
Quote from: Piggy2008
is this just some thing for richmond fans to talk of how good there players are, in my opinion yes and Dusty is not even close to being the GOAT, and they think he is so tough with his dont argue, which is not the case, and richmond will be bad in a few years same with dustin martin, i cant wait for that, these few years are probably his good years then he will just be another over rated, floghead richmond player
Quote from: Piggy2008
3 of his 4 goals in 2020 [Grand Final] were after the game was won
Quote from: Piggy2008
richmond supporters are the biggest flogheads in history and theres like 100000 members which makes it worse
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/can-dustin-martin-be-the-goat.1178795/page-62
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on July 08, 2021, 08:27:12 AM
Wow

Even I am not sure he's the goat

Goat for tigers maybe

But clearly 3 of his 4 goals were when it really mattered. Unbelievable comment. 1 goal got us some momentum. 2nd got us the lead. 3rd sealed the game. 4th iced the cake.

That last effort vs Geelong was clearly his best norm Smith. I actually rated houli higher in 17. 19 was just a bloodbath anyway. 2020 he lifted the team and drove a effing stake through the cats hearts.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on July 08, 2021, 10:41:03 AM
The thing with all the non Richmond AFL fans is that they have hardly watched 10% of Richmond games. Only watch when their team plays us and may have watched the Finals and Grand Finals.

They are missing out on so much joy and the beauty is they don't even know.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: lamington on July 08, 2021, 03:28:56 PM
The thing with Dusty is he has always been a playmaker when we needed him. I’m willing to accept the opinions that Houli deserved the 17 Norm Smith but through my eyes his inside work and especially him getting the ball to Houli for his first goal, that to me is what I think non Richmond fans don’t see.

As for 2020 it was absolutely not up for debate who would win the norm smith. His first goal we desperately needed because we were getting flogged and it all started from there. Not to mention all his goals he was under pressure and fending off and off balance when taking the kick. That GF performance is one of the most insane performances I have ever seen and god it was beautiful
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on July 10, 2021, 07:05:22 AM
Quote from: wayne
I know you're a RIchmond gal, but i've had about enough of the 'poor Tigers injury list' thats been doing the rounds in the media.
Have a look at how long Carltons injury list is now and all year!
What do we get?
"Sack Teague"
Fun Fact: Carlton are just 1 win behind the Tigers!
Quote from: wayne
It wasn't directed specifically at you. The media as a whole have been beating that drum for a while now, it annoys me no end.
Combine that with the practically zero injuries you had in 2017.. you are overdue for injuries.
Sympathy for Richmond is non existent.
Nothing personal
https://twitter.com/waynodiv/status/1412692446887112709

Quote from: GRIMLOCK
Richmond hosting another Friday night game, wow what's next? Geelong, Western Bulldogs? I see the AFL still haven't learnt from gifting crap teams Friday night games like they did with Carlton.  And yes I'm saying Richmond are crap.
https://twitter.com/GRIMLOCKCRUSH/status/1412657119107588105
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tigeritis™©® on July 10, 2021, 12:23:39 PM
What a bunch of boloney that Martin didn’t deserve the 2017 norm smith medal.

Dustin Martin
29 disposals (22 contested) 83%DE
1 tackle
6 clearances
2.2 goals
2 goal assists
9 score involvements
396 metres gained
3 inside 50s
1 mark (1 contested)

Bachar Houli
25 disposals (6 contested) 76%DE
5 tackles
1 clearance
1.2 goals
0 goal assists
4 Score involvements
694 metres gained
3 inside 50s
11 marks (1 contested)

Maybe if bachar kicked his goals it was probable.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: cub on July 10, 2021, 08:57:45 PM
There it is!
The Ash Barty social media turns into and anti tiger nuff fest
Really people Ash is the best !
What a great Aussie ❤️🐅
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: lamington on July 10, 2021, 10:47:29 PM
How dare they! How many aussies have taken home the French open. Also she might be bringing home
Wimbledon. Go ASH!
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Francois Jackson on July 11, 2021, 01:45:37 AM
who cares about other sites posts on twitter and big footy especially anti ash stuff.

I think this thread needs to be deleted.

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on July 12, 2021, 07:54:51 PM
Quote from: AFL
🔥 GOAL 700 🔥

Congrats Jack!

#AFLTigersPies

Quote from: Jake
Almost as many goals as he has flops
Quote from: James
as an honest richmond fan jack has 0 real goals in my book
Quote from: Edmund Bourrilhon
CHF of our worst bloke 22
Quote from: Jake Linardon
Couldn’t have said better Ed. Isn’t it nice to see 4 losses in a row now?
Quote from: alex
Mickey Mouse goals
Quote from: floros_59
I’m so proud of you, FLOG off the year!
https://twitter.com/AFL/status/1414122078127550471
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on July 15, 2021, 02:13:56 AM
Quote from: Jeremy Naydion
Hmm ..they actually took the game of AFL to new lows ….last 5 years the game has been horrid ..and Richmond is a big part of that …it’s all about system ,I personally prefer flair ..just my opinion
https://twitter.com/Naydion65/status/1414429098068254721

Quote from: floros_59
Injuries at Richmond must be the first club to be in this predicament.
Quote from: floros_59
Arrogance and egotistical self esteem is a big concern for the club.
https://twitter.com/floros_59/with_replies
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on July 15, 2021, 08:32:58 PM
Quote from: Matt Longridge
Poor Richmond. Geelong has had to have their home games against them at the mcg for years. Get over it and think your self lucky the game is even going ahead. First world problems
https://twitter.com/longbag11/status/1415618171059400715
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on July 17, 2021, 10:48:55 PM
Quote from: Drapersmullet
No Richmond win is a great win
Quote from: IceTemple
geez the wank fest from 7 about Richmond.
Quote from: Wrighty05
F■■■■ Richmond, F■■■■ lockdown 5.0
Quote from: alex.f.94
Can reiwoldt not play for a free at literally every ■■■■■■■ contest?
Quote from: Wanderlust
Seeing Cotchin happy makes me sad.
Quote from: jonovdp
Sniper and fake Brownlow medalist
Quote from: Finding_Nemo
Give back Jobes Brownlow back you sniping ******
Quote from: TDSpartan
Tv off. No way I’m watching these scumbags celebrate
https://discourse.bomberblitz.com/t/round-18-2021-non-essendon-games/23078/547
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on July 19, 2021, 07:09:13 PM
Quote from: catattack
3 flags in 4 years and no one gives a f*** about you.

People will always rate Brisbane 01-03, Geelong 07-11 and Hawks 13, 14, 15 more than you. For the rest of time, no one will care about your dynasty and I know that hurts you.
Quote from: frggr
Damn man, did you have to go straight for the jugular?

That's the thing though. Richmond - 3 flags, zero respect
Quote from: catempire
I think there’s clearly some hurt there amongst Tiger fans that despite their flags they will not be spoken of with the same admiration as the other great sides of this modern era. They’ve played a brand that was extremely effective but garbage to watch and all the while their club has been full of unlikeable characters.

Good riddance. Whoever wins it this year will be a step up on their crap. Happy for them to retreat into irrelevance. We can help them on their way there this week.
Quote from: Down at K Park
You can see clearly the realisation they have that they are no longer relevant, and will most likely go back to another 3 decades of mediocrity. Back to 9th you braindead flogs.
Quote from: Cataholic
I wonder where all the Richmond supporters hibernated until 2017?

Or even where they've been the last 4 weeks..... Crying in a corner somewhere??
Quote from: Spearman
like some shroom species, they sprout in a pasture when the right amount of cow dung splats on top of them
Quote from: Ricketz
It looks like they are trying, the poor Tiggies - unlike Clarko who packed up bags mid way through 2009. They are just being shown up for the skillless hacks they have always been, sadly.

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/geelong-v-richmond-at-gmhba-mcg-gabba-sat-jul-24-145-pm-rd-19.1277474/page-9
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on July 28, 2021, 10:11:47 PM
Quote from: Neil Stewart
It’s definitely hurt Richmond. They won 3 flags largely due to cheating the mark and creating turnovers.
https://twitter.com/NeilStewartWC/status/1420277214743044098

Quote from: Neil Stewart
This loss to Geelong is even more embarrassing for Richmond than this year’s loss to Geelong was for West Coast.

Tigers coerced the AFL into inexplicably making Geelong play THEIR home game at Richmond’s home ground, and STILL got pantsed.
https://twitter.com/NeilStewartWC/status/1419204185774456832
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on August 08, 2021, 04:33:11 PM
Quote from: carlton4ever
If your talking of the VFL biggest clubs It would be Carlton, Collingwood, Essendon
But if your talking about the new era it would be West Coast, Geelong and Hawthorn
Who do you think the biggest clubs are ?
Quote from: Turnover
Eagles, pies,…..Richmond 9th
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/biggest-clubs-in-the-afl.1280393/


Bomberblitz going the early crow yesterday  :laugh:.
Quote from: millagurnzie1
Its fantastic. Their dynasty was inflated by one individual player too. Its clear as day. Their team is basically exactly the same (even stronger with Lynch).

No dusty = Ninthmond
Quote from: scotty21
Watching the membership numbers plummet next season will be amazing. Take your ARMY and ■■■■ off
Quote from: SillyBilly
No Dusty and an aging Cotchin, highlights how bad Lambert is as a player I reckon…

After half-time:

Quote from: Wanderlust
■■■■ off Richmond
https://discourse.bomberblitz.com/t/round-21-2021-non-essendon-games/23315/482
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on August 13, 2021, 05:27:47 AM
Quote from: Fox Footy
After 3hrs 15min, Toby Greene has failed his final appeal and will miss Friday night's mini-final against Richmond through suspension.
Quote from: Daniel Jack
Saving Richmonds 2021 season in 4K right here (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f4f8.png)
Quote from: Jack
clearly the AFL wants their favourite child Richmond in the finals
https://twitter.com/FOXFOOTY/status/1425732800381001729
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on August 13, 2021, 09:09:51 AM
So the narrative is no Green no GWS

Just like No Martin no Richmond
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: wayne on August 13, 2021, 10:03:05 AM
 :lol

AFL favourites!  :lol

They keep changing the rules to try stop us, we're nobodies favourites.  :lol
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: WilliamPowell on August 13, 2021, 11:47:28 AM
:lol

AFL favourites!  :lol

They keep changing the rules to try stop us, we're nobodies favourites.  :lol

Yep

And I thought last year with our "bubble breaches" we were completely on the nose at HQ

So reckon it's fair to say we are nowhere near being "favourites"
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on August 13, 2021, 12:24:12 PM
Yes I'm sure the expansionist AFL really want a 136 year-old Victorian club with a rusted on fan base to continue winning flags... :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on August 14, 2021, 03:51:25 AM
From Bomberblitz:

Quote from: Drapersmullet"
If we miss finals this year because Richmond is finally put to bed for another 37 years …

I’m ok with that
Quote from: chris_64
Tatah Richmond go back to being Ninthmond for, say 30 years and give some other teams supporters a break from your supporters hubris.
Quote from: Saucy
I hope they fall back into football abyss. It won’t be long until the Tiger Army are spitting on their coach again. Feral ■■■■■.
Quote from: Bomber_Man1984
I, for one, welcome this new era of Tenthmond
Quote from: sweet16
(https://discourse.bomberblitz.com/uploads/default/original/3X/9/9/996cd155f72e4b6dd46adfdc3af4dad4cc0e071f.jpeg)
Quote from: Kicks
(https://discourse.bomberblitz.com/uploads/default/optimized/3X/7/c/7c9e5fb39b3b1c33fadd632d9cb37d9226b6a28b_2_999x750.jpeg)
Quote from: Speedy_Gonzales
(https://discourse.bomberblitz.com/uploads/default/original/3X/8/5/85f7a99e0400eed31bafd38dc2768e3637329f0b.jpeg)
https://discourse.bomberblitz.com/t/round-22-2021-non-essendon-games/23362/446
https://discourse.bomberblitz.com/t/round-22-2021-non-essendon-games/23362/439
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on August 15, 2021, 04:34:06 PM
Quote from: leeroylatham
You played Adelaide, gws and Geelong in a COVID lockdown year and the gf played in Brisbane…no1 except the spitting tigers fans count those as real premierships… win a real flag
Quote from: leeroylatham
30 years of picking the comps ***holes and you have 3 good years where the afl kisses your .... and you think your club is an all time club like the might cats....lol you Richmond sun are back where you belong...
Licking the comps feet in 9th
https://twitter.com/leeroylatham/status/1426359554820898820

Quote from: gazza
It’s called a premiership window they usually last 3-4 years if your lucky.
Interesting enough you only ever won a flag when hocking was boss. Hocking leaves tigers crumble
Quote from: gazza
(https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f602.png) a historic side that won’t make finals too defend their premiership
https://twitter.com/gazgeelong/status/1426353463038861313

Quote from: Georgie Parker
Things that unite the country:
1) The Olympics
2) The Ashes
3) Richmond losing

#AFLGiantsTigers #AFL

Quote from: Darren Camilleri
2 don’t count even the Suns could’ve beaten the Crows and Giants and but I give you last year that was a very good win under the circumstances
https://twitter.com/georgieparker/status/1426135267090395138
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on August 17, 2021, 01:05:11 AM
Quote from: Neil Stewart
Richmond’s culture has been out of control for several years now.

Flatteringly won the flag last year, on the back of having the league’s most favourable fixture in terms of days off between games.

Even Wilson can’t deny that they have categorically imploded.
https://twitter.com/NeilStewartWC/status/1427265299938566145

Quote from: Neil Stewart
Tigers are in West Coast empty Geelong venue mode. Difference is, it’s their home game.

Embarrassing.
Quote from: Tigers live in Kaaren Kornes head Rent Free
Giants home game
Quote from: Neil Stewart
In Richmond’s home state.
https://twitter.com/NeilStewartWC/status/1426133202796630021
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on August 22, 2021, 04:21:29 AM
Quote from: BlakeyNoFlakey
If Richmond loose again today then I'll be happy.
Quote from: JohnZ
Why couldn't Richmond have been this shet last year. ffs the cliff has come quickly for them.
Quote from: dazbroncos
too old and too poo to keep relevance for more than 4 years.

No depth, no tenacity to stick with the challenge

GO Catters
Quote from: Hinkley29
Is this the worst premiership defence of all time? I can't think of a worse one.

I always considered Hawthorn 2009 as the worst premiership defence, but this Richmond season may be even worse.
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/non-geelong-football-afl-discussion-2021-pt2.1279995/page-70
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on August 22, 2021, 07:26:47 AM
Don't think Hawks 09 or Dogs 17 defence was much better
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tiger Khosh on August 22, 2021, 04:32:26 PM
Cats fans would know a thing or two about poor premiership defences considering their all conquering dynasty managed to pull it off a grand record……0 times……. :rollin
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on August 28, 2021, 02:42:22 AM
From Ch 7's AFL twitter:

Coons has a Richmond finals jar (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f923.png)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E9zM7ZzVEAEhfJM?format=jpg&name=900x900)
https://twitter.com/7AFL/status/1431244210586275846
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on August 28, 2021, 07:53:33 AM
Flog
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: wayne on August 28, 2021, 12:45:30 PM
Flog

On record as being a massive Richmond hater
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on August 28, 2021, 12:59:38 PM
Supposedly copped a shyteload of abuse from our supporters after the Brownlow and has hated us ever since... :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on August 28, 2021, 02:03:38 PM
Supposedly copped a shyteload of abuse from our supporters after the Brownlow and has hated us ever since... :shh

Good because it was a poo brownlow anyway, hardly any better than Woewowowodininin
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on August 28, 2021, 04:39:29 PM
This quote was by a Geelong supporter prior to the 2017 QF   :lol.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E9zAeL7VEAcZNwF?format=jpg&name=900x900)
https://twitter.com/Jonesracing82/status/1431230409262592003
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on September 01, 2021, 05:33:07 AM
Quote from: The other Mr.Smith
Have you changed the rules?

Bolton's mark was out voted by Brodie Miochek in Round 8.
Quote from: jsr_820
You're JOKING, right?

WTF is Riewoldt doing in there? He's not even the highest in the air with that mark! (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f926-200d-2642-fe0f.png)

Weightman's was MUCH better.

Clearly a Richmond fan decided the finalists, eh?

Shai Bolton then for the close win, over O'Brien.

Riewoldt isn't even CLOSE...(https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f926-200d-2642-fe0f.png)
https://twitter.com/AFL/status/1432631709124595714
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on September 05, 2021, 01:51:11 PM
In response to the 'Tigers gather their army in fight against Covid' article in the HeraldSun: 

Quote from: Baggers #BringOn2022
That 100,000 boutta get a heap smaller when we beat them in Round 1
Quote from: Patty
25,000 of those members are already up to date with their vaccinations #PETmemberships
Quote from: floros_59
50% are in prison so they already had their shot.
Quote from: duff man
Considering most of their members are animals it may be a little hard
https://twitter.com/superfooty/status/1434053896096280576
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on September 08, 2021, 11:05:05 AM
Quote from: Richmond_FC
Yes, the college crowds are awesome, but some 95K+ Tigers jumping around the ‘G stacks up pretty well too 🔊

https://twitter.com/Richmond_FC/status/1435109775809806338
Quote from: Garrett Mundy
Also stirring when 13,000 of those fans bother to make the long trek 3 kilometres west to Docklands.

That gets the blood pumping.
https://twitter.com/GarrettIvo/status/1435119132362489861
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on September 12, 2021, 11:10:15 PM
The Blues' triumph over the Tigers in 2013 is @RileyBev's favourite final this century, what's yours?

https://twitter.com/AFL/status/1436957249113628676
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on September 13, 2021, 12:18:39 PM
4 years on and we're still in Adelaide fans' heads.


Quote from: aabp1978
It is funny though right...like imagine if our ascent had of been now and not 2017...when you honestly had 3 other very, very good teams (and indeed one "dynasty" team) in the prelims...any of whom could win the premiership. Our 2017 would easily win the premiership this year...in fact, none of the current sides would get within 5 to 10 goals.
Quote from: texanmike
That is just not true....Melbourne, Bulldogs, Port & Geelong all very good teams, any of those teams would of beat us on gf day the way we turned up that day.
Quote from: aabp1978
I dont agree with that. We got beaten by a dynasty team that were playing at home and who the AFL did everything in their power to assist on the day ...
Quote from: texanmike
I think you may need to sit through the GF again and see how badly we played after quarter time. We were on the end of some bad umpiring that day but it didnt cost us the game...but if on that day, had we played like we had majority of that year, we would of won the premiership, i was not that impressed with richmonds 2017 grand final performance, it was more down to how we didn't show up after half time. Their 2019 and 2020 premierships were more impressive. We were no where near the level on grand final day and any of the 4 teams this year would of beat us.
Quote from: ams4crows
Our entire 2017 team were mentally exhausted before they even stepped on the field Grandfinal Day.

Who's fault that is I don't know. They were told to soak up the week and enjoy it and they did it so well they had no energy left on grandfinal day.

I was there that day, I kept thinking it's ok we'll flick the switch soon and play like I know we can. Wasn't until half way through the last quarter that I realised we didn't have a shot to fire at all.
Quote from: jackster83
If you rewatch them doing the power stance before the game, it looks like it suddenly dawned on them that they hadn't won it yet.
Quote from: moogerfooger
The thing about the power stance is it immediately flagged to the opposition we had an issue with mental toughness. If you need a gimmick to project strength, it's a clear weakness.
Quote from: hey shorty
For me it was when Vlaustin held onto Eddie in the goalsquare.

Not blaming the umps but that was the moment the guys dropped off
Quote from: DJ75
It was a blatantly obvious free kick that should have been paid. Add that goal, Eddie up and about and we have significant momentum. Who knows what impact it has on Richmond's belief?
I still think Richmond would have won the game (the McGovern & Smith injuries, the Cotchin decision, our poor team selection and the constant cheating from the umpires ensured it).
Quote from: hey shorty
We were beaten by the inform team of the comp on a ground where they won 20 in a row.
Quote from: Scorpus
No. We were the in form team of the competition. We were the best team all year.
Quote from: Scorpus
Richmond were a good team no doubt but I'm sorry, we were the best team that year aside from the grand final. Aside from a few stinkers (which Richmond had as well) we were destroying teams and finished top of the ladder nearly 20% ahead of the other top 4 sides
Quote from: Get Shorty
They were also playing on a ground they dominated on, and one we struggled on.

Our best performances were better than theirs, but as the ladder suggests they werent that far behind us. We underestimated them.

It had nothing to do with the power stance, or Criminal Minds..... they were just better.
Quote from: GROTTO
I often wonder of the sliding doors phenomenon if Tigers played the Cats down at that sh*t hole in Geelong in Week 1.
Quote from: Dirty Bird
I actually wonder about the rule change eliminating the 3rd man up.

I think that rule change helped Richmond alot with their gameplan. You can't surge it forward if the ball gets wacked out the back past their midfielders.
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/2021-non-crows-afl-3-things-fall-apart.1277473/page-209#post-72055713


Quote from: Rachel Danderfield
And you'll always be 9thmond ❤️
https://twitter.com/danderfield/status/1436372792195227659

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on September 13, 2021, 02:04:28 PM
I think she'll find that it is Geelong who are currently stuck on 9... :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on September 13, 2021, 04:13:35 PM
Yes absolutely correct theyve only ever won 9 flags lol. What a disappointing club they are.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: wayne on September 13, 2021, 07:25:10 PM
Quote
Quote from: Rachel Danderfield
And you'll always be 9thmond ❤️
https://twitter.com/danderfield/status/1436372792195227659

That's the Cats fan that gets her knockers out all the time on twitter
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on September 17, 2021, 03:53:58 PM
Jealous Carlton supporting "journos"  :lol.

Quote from: Damian Tardio
LOL zero credibility here with Richmond v Geelong at number 4
Quote from: Julian de Stoop
Wouldn't be in the top 30 Grand Finals
https://twitter.com/damiantardio/status/1438415772695490565
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on September 17, 2021, 06:58:49 PM
Didn't De Stool just host our B&F? ::)
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Owl on September 18, 2021, 08:12:50 AM
That Twitter is was a portal into every moron in the country I don’t think they left anyone out
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on September 18, 2021, 12:59:16 PM
Once we had open sewers now we have twitter... :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on September 25, 2021, 06:15:42 PM
Ryan Daniels (Perth based footy journo)

Quote from: FootyRhino
The definitive list of best footy songs:

1. @melbournefc
 
2. @GWSGIANTS
 
3. @Richmond_FC (overplayed of late)

4. @NMFCOfficial
 
5. @stkildafc

6. @CarltonFC

7. @sydneyswans
 
8. @CollingwoodFC
 
9. @GeelongCats
 
10. @HawthornFC

#AFL
https://twitter.com/FootyRhino/status/1441599458161037319
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Chuck17 on September 25, 2021, 10:03:56 PM
WTF the Giants

Their song is like a pirate circus
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on September 25, 2021, 10:18:16 PM
The GWS dirge is more suited to the Red Army Choir than a footy club... :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Owl on September 26, 2021, 10:16:07 AM
Pirate circus 🤣
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: cub on September 26, 2021, 03:15:24 PM
The GWS dirge is more suited to the Red Army Choir than a footy club... :shh
Reminds me of that old ‘Moscow’ song
They should be doing that funny Russian squat dance when they sing it
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on September 26, 2021, 07:10:34 PM
Important stat: No matter what happens tonight, Richmond can’t win. #AFLGF

https://twitter.com/sportsbetcomau/status/1441687946046828546
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on September 26, 2021, 11:26:50 PM
No matter what happened last night a Richmond supporter was still going to lift the cup... :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on October 02, 2021, 02:15:08 AM
Quote from: Bill Hartwig
The AFL says compo depends on the length & value of  contract being offered, & then have right of review - which means they can just make it up.
PUB TEST for Mabior Chol at Pick 38. Averages 7  disposals per game, 2 marks per game & 2 tackles a game. Previously delisted.
FAIL!
Quote from: Phil Forsyth
Previously delisted, absolute joke should of been 4th round... (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f926.png)
Quote from: Miguel Sanchez
Shouldn’t the fact Richmond delisted him previously count against the compo they receive?
Quote from: ExclamationMark
Doesn't make sense that Richmond gets end of second round for Chol when Adelaide gets third round for Kelly who's in their best 22
https://twitter.com/cleary_mitch/status/1443830669402984455

Quote from: Handsome B Wonderful
LOL @ AFL corruption. Chol is worth a pack of steak knives
Quote from: john haslam
I Guess a lot of the rules have been designed for some clubs at AFL house in its history its supposed to be an All Australian Competition ha ha ha what a joke its still an expanded VFL DOMAIN wake up AFL
Quote from: Alan O'Callaghan
lol, 30 games in 5 years! The AFL should just scrap the pretence. The rest of us know you lack accountability & integrity.
Quote from: john haslam
Talk sbout favouritsm at Richmond they have the best draft picks in the land and they get compensation for Mabior Chol
What is it Nepotism or stupidity for the whole world to see at AFL HOUSE
OMG SUCH CORRUPTION
https://twitter.com/AFL_House/status/1443828698268909573
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Owl on October 04, 2021, 07:51:34 PM
Omg I cant move my cup around quick enough to catch all these delicious salty tears
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on October 05, 2021, 06:33:20 PM
Quote from: Glen Edwards
Melbourne v Western Bulldogs should Round 1 Thursday night to open the @AFL season. The Grand Finalists from the year before should always kick off the next season. Carlton v Richmond has had its day.
Quote from: dion mccaffrie
Being a national competition perhaps the season could open in another...... oh what was I thinking.
Quote from: Nardinedarling
If the games played in melbourne this season are anything to go by, Richmond will struggle to pull 30,000 anyway
Quote from: Candice
10000% agree with this. And if the VFL don’t want it to be a GF replay at least have the premiership team open the season and unfurl there flag. Regardless who it is.

So so sick of Carlton Richmond every stuffing year. And it’s always the same result.
Quote from: Alli
Totally agree, Carlton and Richmond is no longer a "blockbuster". Two mediocre teams who finished bottom 10. Should be relegated to Sunday 4:40pm timeslot!
https://twitter.com/royslions/status/1444931897981689862
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on October 05, 2021, 08:23:05 PM
R1 is too early for a GF rematch.

Need to space it out, build up to it.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Damo on October 05, 2021, 10:39:44 PM
Grand final rematch should be Anzac Day

Essendon v Collingwood has run its course going off the parameters of half those nuffies
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on October 14, 2021, 05:00:01 PM
Who is the most annoying player in the AFL?

Jack Riewoldt

Jack Riewoldt, what a poster boy for being annoying. Nearing the end of his career, he specialises in jumping on players in the marking contest. A sort of Jack into the pack. The only thing is that he only takes out players and the ball spills free. He doesn’t actually touch it himself.

To top up on this performance, he has developed a vaudeville routine of appealing for a free every time he is in the marking contest. He superbly keeps a straight face. The umpires must bite their lip.

The final trying technique is the invisible hand in the back resulting in falling forward. Opposition backmen are contemplating wearing white gloves so as the umpires can see their hands better.

Jack has been gifted a golden opportunity to annoy the most amount of people. He is a regular on Fox Footy’s AFL 360. Matching his on-field withering looks with spoken hubris does the trick.

“Good luck if you are playing us for the rest of the season.”

And the most annoying thing of all is that Riewoldt still came third in the Coleman.

I don’t think that Jack can claim this crown. He is cheating. Utilising the Edie McGuire technique to increase his irritation. And promptly losing most of his final 2021 games after that outlandish statement – we enjoyed that bit.

I need to apologise to niggly sniper Tom Lynch, push into the ground post-free Trent Cochin, ...

https://www.theroar.com.au/2021/09/20/who-is-the-most-annoying-player-in-the-afl/
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on October 14, 2021, 05:54:22 PM
Wow lol

Sounds like a very salty person
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on November 09, 2021, 05:44:21 AM
In response to Benny Gale's comments yesterday.

Quote from: Neil Stewart
Imagine if he actually DID become CEO.

The only rule changes that would be implemented would be ones that benefit Richmond.
https://twitter.com/NeilStewartWC/status/1457452163274194947
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Owl on November 09, 2021, 09:22:02 AM
Did you see Kane Cornes post in there?  He supports Gale
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on November 10, 2021, 04:09:54 AM
Another response to Benny Gale's comments.

Quote from: floros_69
Poor Richmond won the last 3 out off 5 premierships and still (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f92c.png) winging
https://twitter.com/floros_59/status/1457897420377899012




Did you see Kane Cornes post in there?  He supports Gale
Need to frame this, Owl. The one time Kane Cornes was right  :snidegrin.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Owl on November 11, 2021, 11:32:40 AM
 :snidegrin 
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on November 11, 2021, 12:17:18 PM
Did you see Kane Cornes post in there?  He supports Gale

(https://img1.wsimg.com/isteam/ip/8703076c-13a9-4d6a-9ae7-c9fdcdfcc0c3/45c53cfe-7700-44ae-ae4a-39d38af26986.jpg/:/rs=w:1280)
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on November 12, 2021, 08:43:59 PM
Quote from: Daniel O'Neill
I’m sure Port would love to have more opportunities to play at the G rather than the 2 or so games they get per season. If any team doesn’t need more games at the G though, it’s the Tiges.
https://twitter.com/Dan_Iel78/status/1458922171498053646
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on November 20, 2021, 06:55:56 AM
In response to Brereton saying we'll win the flag next year ...

Quote from: Grant
Lol this bloke has suffered way too many concussions Richmond won’t even make the 8.
https://twitter.com/grant_finlayson/status/1460889270009282561

Quote from: EssEnDoN-Proud Lifer 👍AZ💉💉👍
Going to be tough from 9th
https://twitter.com/KRUDLER62/status/1460896518030827522
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on November 20, 2021, 07:15:13 PM
 They the way they think they are funny.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on November 24, 2021, 08:38:25 PM
Quote from: Glenn Jongebloed
Lol at Richmond having pick 9 #AFLDraft
https://twitter.com/Fearsword/status/1463434948153516036
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Owl on November 24, 2021, 09:54:00 PM
Just look at the clowns feed cyclops he is a certifiable nutter
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on November 24, 2021, 10:26:06 PM
Quote from: Kingy
Good luck to Tom Brown at the Tigers.

The Browns are a cracking family.

Just a pity there wasn't another 16 games for Paul at Geelong.

Ironically, the Tigers used a pick they got from the Cats.
Quote from: Lord McBain
They are a trash club. Just another reason to hate them… they’re not quite hawthorn but they’re getting there
Quote from: Lord McBain
It’s Richmond… that’s not a good home for decent people (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f602.png) (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f602.png)
https://twitter.com/LordMcBain/status/1463464717989527556
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on November 25, 2021, 05:33:57 AM
Geelong forum after we took Tom Brown:

Quote from: rocker_oz33
***** took Brown.
Quote from: Two Planks
Mongrels
Quote from: dazbroncos
Tigers take with pick 17 Tom Brown.

Just to f*** with us.

Early?!?!
Quote from: Turbocat
Friggin Rich take Tom Brown..... so much for those that thought we were getting sucked in because he was a Father Son
Quote from: calder_daddy
Lol

Even more reason to hate the Tuggers
Quote from: petrolium
Brown will eventually be a Cat. Mark my words
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/2021-afl-live-draft-thread-with-a-geelong-slant.1293265/page-9
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on November 25, 2021, 09:57:21 AM

Quote from: petrolium
Brown will eventually be a Cat. Mark my words

We can get a 2nd round pick in 2033 when we trade him to Geelong. Will only be 30 so might be a bit young for them
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Owl on November 25, 2021, 08:40:43 PM
Yeah, they will keep him in the vfl til he matures
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on November 28, 2021, 06:47:52 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FFQN9h5VIAItqWK?format=jpg&name=medium)
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on December 14, 2021, 04:53:23 PM
Eagles fan.

Quote from: Baird
Why is Richmond in the title and not Essendon? Even Carlton I reckon has more fans than Richmond

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/which-club-has-the-biggest-supporter-base-collingwood-richmond-or-west-coast.1239860/page-59#post-73159073
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Owl on December 15, 2021, 07:39:09 PM
lol the bloke at the end sums it up beautifully.  Dunny budgie lol
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on December 26, 2021, 05:22:13 AM
Quote from: cats_09
What was the BS reason why Richmond after winning a premiership couldn't travel down the highway for our home match?

Just curious because current premiers Melbourne & fellow grand finalist Western Bulldogs, both have trips down the highway next season...
Quote from: kickazz
I suppose they figure Richmond at the moment will still pull a bigger crowd. A fews years of mediocrity and a fall off in attendances would see them back at KP - especially if any of Essendon, Collingwood, Carlton become any good.
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/2022-season-fixture-ticketing-info.1294364/page-2
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on December 26, 2021, 07:36:25 PM
Quote from: Big Ben
... there is no possible way anyone can argue Richmond's 'dynasty' was better than ours [Hawthorn].

Richmond 2017-2020 are more comparable to Adelaide 1997-1998, a good but not great team which got it done when it mattered thanks to individual brilliance from Dusty/McLeod on the big stage.

That's not to mention Shane Ellen kicking 5 goals in 1997 from a forward pocket, Jack Graham kicking 3 goals in 2017 while tagging Sloane in the midfield, and some individual brilliance from Houli/Jarman on the biggest stage.

Adelaide's 1999 season and Richmond's 2021 season were both quite similar to each other as well. Adelaide getting flogged twice by North Melbourne in 1999 after beating them in the 1998 grand final and Richmond getting flogged by Geelong twice in 2021 after beating them in the 2020 grand final is the main similarity worth pointing out, along with both premiership defences being neck and neck with one another for the worst premiership defence in recent memory.

Yes, before anyone says it, Hawthorn 2009 and Bulldogs 2017 were both poor premiership defences, but neither were as poor as Adelaide 1999 and Richmond 2021.

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/greatest-dynasty-of-the-21st-century-lions-vs-cats-vs-hawks-vs-tigers.1286802/post-72805904
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on December 30, 2021, 02:08:36 PM
This from a Pies fan in 2014 aged well :rollin.

Quote from: South of the Yarra

The Premiership Droughts of 3 of the alleged 'Big 4' is interesting.
Essendon - 15 years
Carlton- 20 years
Richmond- 35 Years

I would suggest Hawthorn and Geelong have left these minnows from last century for dead.

Nov 6, 2014

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/the-big-4-2015.1079200/post-36011001
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on January 04, 2022, 04:01:29 PM
Why I hate the Richmond Tigers

(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/JI1pW7bixOk/hqdefault.jpg) (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JI1pW7bixOk)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JI1pW7bixOk



Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on January 04, 2022, 04:02:11 PM
Quote from: Bharat Sundaresan
They do inculcate the values of club loyalty very young in Australia, especially when it comes to footy. Had the 5-year-old seated behind me on the flight sing the @Richmond_FC club song on repeat for over an hour #AFL
https://twitter.com/beastieboy07/status/1477220542461595650




Quote from: Kane Cornes
Quote from: captain blood 17
Just saw @Richmond_FC’s fixture. Finally we get to play Port Adelaide at the MCG. @kanecornes must be headless.
I’m happy, easy win for the (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f350.png)
https://twitter.com/kanecornes/status/1468810031025901569
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: MintOnLamb on January 05, 2022, 07:24:07 AM
Why I hate the Richmond Tigers

(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/JI1pW7bixOk/hqdefault.jpg) (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JI1pW7bixOk)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JI1pW7bixOk
What a waste
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on January 15, 2022, 07:54:17 PM
Swans fan ...

Quote from: RUNVS
Richmond have won 3 premierships in 5 years and their fans act like the biggest victims ... They may have won premierships but their fans are well and truly in the mindset of what Richmond used to be. I suppose it is like an abused child, a few years of success for that person doesn't erase the emotional damage inflicted.

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/does-anyone-not-like-the-majority-of-their-own-teams-fanbase.1297355/post-73392953
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on January 19, 2022, 04:07:49 PM
The envy of Bomber fans  :wallywink.

Quote from: Stallion
AFL lovechild
Quote from: Finding Nemo
Still baffles me that a team full of bog average players sprinkled with a few stars manged to win 3 flags
Quote from: Scotty
Helps that for 2 of the flags the other side didn’t show up on GF day.
Quote from: alex.f.94
That top 5 bnf is legit full of plodders. I’m going out on a limb and saying bottom 4
Quote from: Westozziebomber
their midfield is bottom 4 imo

won’t make the 8
Quote from: bidzy
I don’t get all the hype on Richmond in 2022, where all the predictions are that they surge back into the Top 8, some even have them in the Top 4. They will be lucky to make the 8!
Quote from: Sameolds2010
100K d■■■■
Quote from: Captain_Jack
Whereas l don’t believe Jack struggled one bit with being a massive tool. It looked to come quite natural to him.
Quote from: Finding Nemo
Surley we beat them this time they are just about cactus

They won the last 10 or 11 against us sick of losing to these f■■■■. we were on our way to beating them last year then somehow they flicked the switch and we got our arses handed in a 10 mintue burst

What a crock of ■■■■ that was. Tigers legit only played a good 10 minutes of footy in total we had them f■■■■ where we wanted for 3 and a bit qrts
https://discourse.bomberblitz.com/t/season-2022-richmond/24472/45
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on January 30, 2022, 03:08:04 PM
Quote from: Michael
Richmond fans claiming this as their own just like they claim 2020 as a real premiership

*logs off and throws phone over the back fence*
Quote from: Michael
It was bound to happen, just surprised it wasn’t Ralphy

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FKRAzpMaQAE5MDT?format=jpg&name=medium)
Quote from: Clinton Mitchell
Al barracks for Richmond so, apple doesn’t fall too far from the tree
Quote from: Joel Hibble
Of course he does. Only Richmond fans would be so self absorbed to do it.
Quote from: Heidi
Just congratulate her and leave the tiges/dusty out of it? Like, how hard is it?
https://twitter.com/MWL152
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 04, 2022, 02:05:55 PM
(https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/attachments/1643885853388-png.1321380/)

(https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/attachments/1643885860830-png.1321381/)
(https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/attachments/1643885876413-png.1321382/)
(https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/attachments/1643885892831-png.1321383/)
(https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/attachments/1643885918063-png.1321384/)
(https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/attachments/1643885924285-png.1321385/)
(https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/attachments/1643885933614-png.1321386/)
https://twitter.com/AFL/status/1489041998568824835
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Owl on February 05, 2022, 12:01:45 AM
Bitter lil biatches 😂
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on February 06, 2022, 01:55:22 PM
Get on dusty for the brownlow
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 06, 2022, 06:30:08 PM
Pies fan:

Quote from: Taylor Mancal
Why does everyone think Dustin is an immortal (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f602.png) the man played one good season and 3 good games on grand final day (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f602.png) goes missing for half the year every f***** year
Quote from: Taylor Mancal
Coxyyyyyyy the goat, if you don’t think I rate Dustin Martin you’re obviously misunderstanding what I’m saying, he’s a very good footballer and a match winner on his day. But he’s very over rated (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f972.png)
Quote from: Taylor Mancal
(https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f602.png)(https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f602.png)(https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f602.png)(https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f602.png)(https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f602.png)(https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f602.png)(https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f602.png) best player in the league take a f***** breath
Quote from: Taylor Mancal
Definitely taking petracca and Oliver over dusty too now I think about it
https://twitter.com/stopsykO/status/1489510332594753539
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 07, 2022, 04:31:13 AM
Another Pies fan  :wallywink.

Quote from: timokane
memo : hey richmond you are not the premiers Melbourne are

richmond pricks are at it again

i hate richmond

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/the-richmond-pricks-are-at-it-again.1299307/
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 10, 2022, 05:07:39 PM
Norf fans sooking  :snidegrin

Quote from: Teflon Snake
Quote from: AFL
Why Richmond could have 'the recruit of the year'
Criminally ignored in AA teams for several seasons, now Robbie Tarrant becomes the "recruit of the year" when he moves to a club with a large membership. (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f644.png)
Quote from: Teddy van Ramsey
Of course. But we are proud @NMFCOfficial we don’t care.
Quote from: whathisdan
Yep and will get an AA nod too (should've had several), at a different club (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f644.png)
https://twitter.com/SnakeTeflon_AFL/status/1491534450693337089
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 15, 2022, 04:35:12 AM
Quote from: Kristen
Ruin a first date in four words.
Quote from: Georgie Parker
I go for Richmond.
https://twitter.com/georgieparker/status/1493142762170236931
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 01, 2022, 06:51:42 AM
Quote from: DamonC
Rate Dusty very highly but he’s had 4 really great seasons. The very best have had 8 or more
Quote from: Ian Wilton
FFS!! Don't tell me we have to put up with this Dusty s*** all year.....again. Can't we have a photo of some other Richmond player? There are others aren't there?
Quote from: Baxter
Come on @7AFL and @ncb_cfc Dusty isn’t Richmond’s best so how can you label him amongst these two player?
Quote from: daveyboyjr
hes "overrated" because dangerfield has been better than him every single year (even 2017 he was better and that was dustys best season) until 2021. Only reason people think hes a goat is cus he played on one of the best finals team ever while danger played on the worst
https://twitter.com/7AFL/status/1498178403174072320
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 04, 2022, 03:27:54 PM
Bombers fans:

Quote from: Riley Nelson
2022 #AFL Ladder prediction:

1. Melbourne
2. Western Bulldogs
3. Brisbane
4. Geelong
5. Fremantle
6. Port Adelaide
7. Essendon
8. GWS
9. Richmond
10. Sydney
11. Carlton
12. Collingwood
13. West Coast
14. St. Kilda
15. North Melbourne
16. Adelaide
17. Gold Coast
18. Hawthorn
Quote from: Steve Sagar
Richmond in its right place and Carlscum below the Bombers.  A good start.
Quote from: TimothyJ
Any ladder prediction with Tigers at 9th is always off to a good start! (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f923.png)
Quote from: Jonathan Sharp
Richmond 9th lol
Quote from: Dean Armellin
Youve got Richmond in the right position LOL. They are the 9th specialists
Quote from: Riley Nelson
Essendon has a more exciting list than Richmond. Will be dependent on injuries though
https://twitter.com/rileyjnelson13/status/1498478981552959488
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 08, 2022, 08:28:29 AM
A whacky bot and Suns fan.

Quote from: House Divided Bot
A HOUSE DIVIDED
Richmond Tigers / Gold Coast Suns

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FM5ECefXwAEKnsn?format=jpg&name=small)
Quote from: Never Say Die
Nah. Richmond are back to being the Suns' bunnies. Just ask Karmichael Hunt.
https://twitter.com/HouseDividedBot/status/1499210537409957888
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 11, 2022, 04:36:11 AM
In response to Foxsports predicting us to finish 3rd.

Quote from: right clicking nfts
I'd wager Richmond are more likely to finish bottom six than top three
Quote from: Damien Webb
Richmond….. struggle for top 8
Quote from: Shayne Brown
Zero chance Richmond finish top 4.
Quote from: M Kav
Richmond LOL
Quote from: Teflon Snake (vibes)
There's no chance Richmond finish 3rd
https://twitter.com/FOXFOOTY/status/1501770800935804930
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on March 11, 2022, 11:18:45 AM
Well if last year is anything to go by then there's merit to what they're saying.

Good players all a year older, starting the year with key injuries, only Tarrant at 32 added as instantly playable - the draftees will take time, umps absolutely hate us and the rules have been changed to stuff our game style.

I think we'll be lucky to make the top 6 at best, although I have my 20th year of membership this year and am happy to be proven wrong or go watch a belting every fortnight.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 13, 2022, 05:00:59 PM
In response to MMM: "The Tigers line-up is still scary"

Quote from: Tony Gullaci
Is it though?
Quote from: Shimbo
Pretty easy win for Carlton round 1. What a terrible line up . Blues by over 35. Lock it in
Quote from: liam
Toothless tigers
Quote from: floros_59
Yeah until they start having injuries and then they are crap.
https://twitter.com/FootyonNine/status/1502785148315701257
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 19, 2022, 05:05:43 AM
Ch 7's Georgie Parker (Crows fan):

How I imagine Tigers fans were last night realising the dynasty is done.

https://twitter.com/georgieparker/status/1504705190729232385



Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Francois Jackson on March 20, 2022, 08:55:08 AM
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rJ2Te0pC0EM
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on March 20, 2022, 04:35:51 PM
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rJ2Te0pC0EM
"I've waited my whole life to win round 1"

"This is our Grand Final and we've won it"

That's sad :lol.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on March 20, 2022, 06:00:35 PM
Ch 7's Georgie Parker (Crows fan):

How I imagine Tigers fans were last night realising the dynasty is done.

https://twitter.com/georgieparker/status/1504705190729232385

Considering we got 3 flags and a prelim Im pretty happy with my lot in my football supporting life ;D
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on March 21, 2022, 09:24:55 AM
Ch 7's Georgie Parker (Crows fan):

How I imagine Tigers fans were last night realising the dynasty is done.

https://twitter.com/georgieparker/status/1504705190729232385

So they are now admitting it was a dynasty????
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 23, 2022, 05:27:13 AM
More from Georgie Parker ...

Quote from: Georgie Parker
Richmond supporters leaving during the 4th quarter. Oh I’ve missed that. (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f970.png) #AFLBluesTigers
Quote from: Georgie Parker
Just saw someone throw their scarf off the second level at the ground. Lol.
https://twitter.com/georgieparker/status/1504410393523154944
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Damo on March 23, 2022, 08:10:52 AM
Georgie needs to worry about not putting fingers in other hockey players bums before she worries about Richmond supporters leaving early
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: wayne on March 23, 2022, 12:13:33 PM
The salty crow supporter lol

Gets some bites and posts the fishing emoji and thinks she's witty.

Another one we broke from 2017. 
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: camboon on March 23, 2022, 08:16:43 PM
10 year wait to enjoy someone else pain, get a life you silly OLD scrubber.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Jonesracing82 on March 24, 2022, 12:05:24 AM
Parkers obsession with Richmond is becoming embarrassing
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Diocletian on March 24, 2022, 12:56:18 AM
I liked her in A Country Practice.... :shh
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 24, 2022, 03:15:38 AM
Quote from: Georgie Parker
The only thing you’ve ever done wrong, Ash, is support Richmond. But I can look past that.
https://twitter.com/georgieparker/status/1506466838766845954
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 28, 2022, 06:42:39 PM
Quote from: Stephen Williams
Richmond 9th. Order restored to the universe.
https://twitter.com/AFL/status/1508208136317931526

-------------------------------------------------------------------

In response to our win ...

Quote from: Tay
Those umpires calls are not it
Quote from: Jack
umps lol
Quote from: Cherry
The umpires did more than the tigers did
Quote from: Cherry
26 to 18..... Richmond getting more free kicks like usual. But I know as a Richmond supporter you're not very bright
Quote from: Cherry
They say that but every game they have more free kicks than their opposition.
Quote from: Cherry
Honestly I think it's absurd how many Richmond fans don't see the biased
https://twitter.com/AFL/status/1507974899108704258
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on March 28, 2022, 07:02:12 PM
Lol that cherry person wtf
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on April 02, 2022, 07:51:54 PM
Quote from: demondavey
As good as Richmond were in 2020, Port then Geelong soiled themselves in big moments. Can’t help but feel that Geelong and Port were better sides in 2020.
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/has-ken-hinkley-been-found-out.1127827/post-74219796
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on April 15, 2022, 04:25:14 AM
Quote from: AFL

One word for Shai Bolton's potential: "scary"


Quote from: Michael Lyons
Last weekend, Bolton kicks a goal with the same degree of difficulty and from exactly the same position on the ground as Gresham - what's the big deal??
Quote from: Danial Smith
Everytime he is written about about that he does nothing for 2 months
Quote from: Scott Cresswell
Commentators go overboard on this guy he not that good
Quote from: Robert Walsh
Overrated.
Quote from: Chris Seltsiotis
More like overrated...
Quote from: Thomas Draper
Pretender sounds better
Quote from: Brandon Dalglish
Does it once every 6 weeks. Lazy.
https://www.facebook.com/AFL/photos/a.264711586416/10158731010686417
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on April 18, 2022, 06:44:27 AM
Comments about Cotch's fine.

Quote from: ILE p
Not the first time this turd has been looked after. Green would've got 8 weeks
Quote from: John maiden
Another protected species!
Quote from: Annie Wyllie
Protected sniper
Quote from: Frank Saprano
Teflon Trent…
Quote from: Martin Lovatt
Why suspend him now? He’s been sniping for years
Quote from: HoldenMCaulfield
No, really ? (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f644.png) Did Walker get a fine for pushing one of the AFL's little darlings after getting into the way of Cotchin's boot ?
Quote from: ScottyP\.tten
Why? Because he plays for a VFL club.
Quote from: Tim Peck
Challenge it Gil, it's grossly inadequate...
https://twitter.com/superfooty/status/1515637270606274565
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on April 19, 2022, 09:46:49 PM
Quote from: Donkey Magoo He-Haw
So, my kid doesn’t want to do @AFL @AFLAuskick anymore because he is worried that some one will try to kick his legs like Trent Cotchin. I can’t blame him because the AFL says it’s ok. #weflyasone
Quote from: Samuel B
Tex will probably get suspended for saying this. They'll contact Cotchin, apologise, scrap the fine and give him a free car or something.
Quote from: Vasili Tsouvalas
Absolute disgrace. Can’t do this in football but can do it in Aussie rules. Tex is spot on. He would’ve been given 12 months if he did this to Cotchin
Quote from: Lachy Steele
Thats true. Cotchin is a protected species.
Quote from: Nick
Classic Cotchin cheap shot. Worst Brownlow medalist* ever.
Quote from: John Brincat
He’s correct. Cotchin is as dirty as Toby Greene but Teflon coated. How he played in the grand final after the KO of Dylan Shiels remains a slur on the AFL to this day.
Quote from: Jeff Turner
Cotchin a protected beast - has been a sniper for years now and should have missed a GF - Tex is right and of course he will be forgiven, by most
Quote from: Ian Hopper
You are aware that in that grand final the crows out scored Richmond in 2 quarters and only lost by 48 points which is no where near the biggest grand final loss and is less than the bulldogs lost by last year. Get over it. Your club is in rapid decline and so is Cotchin who
https://twitter.com/search?q=Cotchin&src=trend_click&f=live&vertical=trends
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on April 19, 2022, 11:41:38 PM
Triple premiership captain :D

Don't see anyone sooking about Hodge elbowing Swallow in the head.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Damo on April 20, 2022, 01:53:17 AM
Donkey Magoo should be ashamed at how soft the kid is
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on April 20, 2022, 10:14:29 AM
Donkey Magoo should be ashamed at how soft the kid is

lol exactly what I was thinking. But the kid has a donkey for a father so we should cut him some slack
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on April 26, 2022, 05:27:03 AM
Quote from: Ben Hill
Martin coming for Cyril’s most overrated player of all time title
Quote from: Ben Hill
Probably get your eyes off the stats and watch the game boss. He was the reason the won in 2020. There were guys with more influence on the game in 17 and 19
Quote from: Ben Hill
If you were watching you’d know he got most of those stats you’re blowing a load over in junk time when the game was already over. Did he stand out? Sure, he’s Dustin Martin. Was he best on ground three times? No. Only people who think he was are Tiger fans and channel 7 numpties
https://twitter.com/BenHilly94/status/1517760913893638144

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 03, 2022, 06:59:52 PM
Quote from: Neil Stewart
Literally the last three Eagles shots at goal should have had 50s paid, but none were. #AFLEaglesTigers
Quote from: Neil Stewart
And now the Tigers get one to set up a goal, for god knows what. The Eagles get absolutely CRUCIFIED by the umps when playing at home these days. #AFLEaglesTigers
https://twitter.com/NeilStewartWC/with_replies
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 10, 2022, 12:38:26 PM
Poor Neil still struggling with us flogging his Weagles by 109 pts :lol.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FSUfD0JaUAU-jXj?format=jpg&name=large)
https://twitter.com/NeilStewartWC/status/1523629198669389824
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 13, 2022, 07:45:59 PM
Quote from: Rick Montiadis
Absolutely a high contact. The open hand to the throat could easily break the hyoid bone or the trachea . I’ve said it before and I will say it again it’s only a matter of time before we see a tragedy occurring. Victorians are seduced by the thuggery of Dusty Martin
Quote from: Rick Montiadis
If I was Peter Daicos I would feel aggrieved by that tackle on Josh’s throat. That in the real world is an assault. Yet on the football field we celebrate it as a Dustin Martin skill. It’s time the umpires stamped it out. I wonder who will be legally liable if a tragedy occurred
https://twitter.com/RickMontiadis1/status/1524724743965880320
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Damo on May 13, 2022, 08:03:05 PM
Time for Rick to focus on netball
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: lamington on May 13, 2022, 09:49:19 PM
Iim pretty sure it’s on the shoulder?
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 14, 2022, 02:29:20 AM
Where's Kane Cornes?

Quote from: 7AFL
Should Collingwood be allowed to play all of their home games at the MCG?

Quote from: Daniel
They shouldn't be allowed to play there away games at the MCG.
For every away game played at the MCG  should be a home game played else where. Same goes for Richmond.
Quote from: chook roast
So build another stadium. Ridiculuous that 6 teams can have 1 home ground.

https://twitter.com/7AFL/status/1525057337987579904
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 18, 2022, 12:06:18 AM
Carlton supporters :nopity

Quote from: MW
Good one Rohan, I agree, Richmond looks great with all the umpire support through the game with an opposition missing half a team. Plus easy run home, yeh Richmond!!!
Quote from: Craig
[Richmond] Won't play finals
Quote from: Carlton Blues fans
Lynch fined for wrestling but all good on the Saad eye gouge
Quote from: Stephen Wilson
I like a Good Game of Football But the Suck Face Umpires Persercuted Carlton Last Night and gave Richmond Free kicks when they Did'nt deserve them .
Quote from: Fevolenko
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FVX5-y7agAE04Z8?format=jpg&name=large)
Quote from: The Ian PrenderCast
I’d send the message out if and when the game is over: put Shai Bolton in a body bag. #AFLTigersBlues

https://twitter.com/search?q=Carlton&src=typed_query&f=live
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tiger Khosh on June 18, 2022, 01:30:03 AM
Carlton supporters :nopity

Quote from: MW
Good one Rohan, I agree, Richmond looks great with all the umpire support through the game with an opposition missing half a team. Plus easy run home, yeh Richmond!!!
Quote from: Craig
[Richmond] Won't play finals
Quote from: Carlton Blues fans
Lynch fined for wrestling but all good on the Saad eye gouge
Quote from: Stephen Wilson
I like a Good Game of Football But the Suck Face Umpires Persercuted Carlton Last Night and gave Richmond Free kicks when they Did'nt deserve them .
Quote from: Fevolenko
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FVX5-y7agAE04Z8?format=jpg&name=large)
Quote from: The Ian PrenderCast
I’d send the message out if and when the game is over: put Shai Bolton in a body bag. #AFLTigersBlues

https://twitter.com/search?q=Carlton&src=typed_query&f=live

Lol imagine a Carlton supporter posting a pic of a bag of money…….
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 20, 2022, 05:48:59 AM
Quote from: 7AFL
"As soon as he showed it, the first thing that came into my brain was...how many dinosaurs are gonna be saying, 'you can't be doing that.'"

Did you love or hate Shai Bolton's celebration?

Quote from: #JTkrafty
Hate it as he did nothing all night no need to show off on his one good@thing for the night
Quote from: Rhino
No one gives a poo about Richmond you flogs who writes this rubbish there was other games on today
https://twitter.com/7AFL/status/1538435027427532800
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on June 22, 2022, 05:15:10 PM
Blues fans response to RFC twitter posting the Pickett tackle on Cripps.

Quote from: The Ian PrenderCast
I could understand fans trying to turn this into some iconic moment, but the Club itself?!

Bloke gets poo handball, is sold into a cul-de-sac surrounded by three opponents, where he can’t avoid contact and has no one to dispose of the ball to.

It’s a free kick. That’s it.
Carlton twitter page in 2019 posted Silvagni tackle against Essendon
https://twitter.com/CarltonFC/status/1101052521064194050

 :wallywink


Quote from: The Ian PrenderCast
Quote from: Shai
Imagine if ur saviour patty did that to Dustin, yous would all be creaming for days
Well, it’s Dusty, so it wouldn’t have been paid holding the ball.



Quote from: Jack Hardie
Dangerous tackle too? Granted, it was momentum that took him to the ground, but he was picked up and body slammed
Quote from: Ashley Brookes
Lifting someone and slamming them into the ground gets weeks in decent footy associations.
Quote from: Paul Maidment
How was that not a dangerous tackle gets me
Quote from: bluebaby
How was that not a dangerous tackle. 2 actions, dumped him on his back
Quote from: bearmunger
Had no prior, Tackle dangerous, But we are talking Baggers here expected decision
Quote from: Annmarie
High and a spear tackle should have been a free to Crippa.
https://twitter.com/ThePrenderCast/status/1538822162559029253
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on June 22, 2022, 10:01:14 PM
Not a high fend off? Lol
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on July 06, 2022, 04:34:40 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FW51kkiaAAIbEfg?format=jpg&name=large)

Quote from: Neil Stewart
For all the poo Jack Darling cops, he never gets shots at goal from flopping and flailing the way Jack Reiwoldt does. Darling very rarely receives free kicks even when they are blatantly obvious. #AFLTigersEagles
Quote from: Neil Stewart
It’s difficult to tweet fast enough to keep up with all these mysterious free kicks that are swinging the game in Richmond’s favour. #AFLTigersEagles
Quote from: Neil Stewart
Bizarre phantom free kick paid to Bolton to halt the Eagles surge and set up the Reiwoldt shot at goal. The umpires arent even concerned with hiding their bias today. #AFLTigersEagles
Quote from: Neil Stewart
If you discount the scores Richmond have been gifted by bizarre umpiring decisions, the scoreline would be very close. Actually works in West Coast’s favour in terms of staying in the mix for pick 1. #AFLTigersEagles
Quote from: Neil Stewart
Can anyone explain why that last free kick to Daniel Rioli was paid? It wasn’t high or late. He just flung he head back and the ump fell for it. West Coast are being slaughtered by the umpires, even more than usual. #AFLTigersEagles
Quote from: Neil Stewart
Hard to distinguish whether this is just another trademark lackluster first half by West Coast, or if they are simply behind because of the deplorably bad and shamelessly biased umpiring. #AFLTigersEagles
Quote from: Neil Stewart
Not a bad quarter for the Eagles considering (as usual) they are getting absolutely, unequivocally stuffed over by the umpires. #AFLTigersEagles
Quote from: Neil Stewart
Can the Eagles go an entire quarter without being awarded a free kick? #afltigerseagles
Quote from: Neil Stewart
Almost ten minutes of game time and the Eagles yet to receive a free. Richmond’s lone goal resulted after a very iffy free against Rotham. #afltigerseagles
https://twitter.com/NeilStewartWC
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on July 06, 2022, 07:14:23 PM
Neil's long obsession with hating Richmond continues  :lol.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: rogerd3 on July 06, 2022, 07:17:22 PM
Neil's long obsession with hating Richmond continues  :lol.
His mum let him have access to his computer.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: wayne on July 06, 2022, 07:45:07 PM
Neil's long obsession with hating Richmond continues  :lol.

 :lol  :lol

He has forgotten all the umpire love the Eagles get at their home ground
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Owl on July 07, 2022, 01:03:09 AM
Bloody hell, these clowns make me look sane.  At least we have stats backing us up lol
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on July 21, 2022, 04:45:02 AM
Too tough on Toby: Richmond issues please explain to AFL umpires for skipper’s ‘harsh’ treatment in 2022
https://twitter.com/FOXFOOTY/status/1549624512484114432

Quote from: Rexy
Tiger Tears (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f62d.png)
Quote from: Overview
Ooh please... You play with intent to injure or harm and you get your judt rewards. Being getying away with it gor a while. Dimma grab some tissues please (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f60f.png)
Quote from: Tomislav316
Nank is an A grade sniper the mould of Shane Mumford, zero sympathy.
Quote from: Anne Wyllie
Harsh you have to be kidding, he is another version of Mumford and goes in carelessly. Another whinge from Richmond. Boo hoo
Quote from: DardyGrade
Stop doing stupid poo then clown. Pretty easy to go hard at the ball without trying to actually kill someone.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on July 24, 2022, 05:06:39 AM
(https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/attachments/1658578218747-png.1454509/)
https://twitter.com/NeilStewartWC/status/1550457561723568128
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on July 24, 2022, 12:45:55 PM
Despite being low scoring I actually thought the game was good viewing for the most part and well umpired.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on July 26, 2022, 02:16:21 PM
Opposition fans reaction to a fringe player leaving Richmond.

Quote from: TheRacheleShow
exodus. culture. 9th.
Quote from: RooDom
What’s going on at the tigers everyone leaving a sinking ship ..
Quote from: Melon Usk
Gee. Richmond imploding.
https://twitter.com/FOXFOOTY/status/1551750288981106690

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: lamington on July 26, 2022, 05:50:55 PM
stuff Kane lambert retiring with a degenerative hip and Matt Parker a fringe player who isn’t in our best 22 when everyone is fit leaving to go home for family reasons equates to “exodus”

Although the clubs have made some blues in drafting, where I must tip my hat is the club has done extremely well in retaining our A grade stock.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on July 26, 2022, 07:32:04 PM
Plus Caddy. Also cooked/past it lol.

So two 30+ guys retire with injuries, one fringe player gets told he won't get a contract so he moves home. Nekminit the place is communist China
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on July 26, 2022, 08:14:04 PM
Its a changing of the guard. Shedda and Jack are probably next. People want to bring in ready mades, I think we should take our picks to the draft and only bring in free agents that wont cost us draft capital. Another 4 or 5 kids to round off the current crop then hit free agents at the end of next year.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on August 01, 2022, 04:08:35 AM
Quote from: AFL
The Tigers come from behind to win an absolute thriller! 🐯

#AFLTigersLions

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FY-uH2mVQAA307I?format=jpg&name=900x900)

Quote from: champagnesanni
You can’t grab a bloke as he’s taking his kick after taking a mark
Quote from: Rob Lannister
I thought that was more a 50m penalty at the end. Tackles the bloke behind his mark

Old mate was standing and was already well over the mark. Clear 50 champ
Quote from: Grant F
They only won due to having 3 extra players that’s the only way they got two premierships pathetic football club.
Quote from: Jack
Has there been a worse umpired half in the history of the game?
Quote from: Nick Hoggan
Nice win, AFL, secure those Tigers fan base $$$ in the finals. Bottom line must be a bit low...
Quote from: Bec Ross
With the help of the umpires! Well done to all involved! (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f44e.png)
Quote from: Kyle Burnett
So you’re not allowed to stop someone from turning into the corridor or move on the mark. But you’re allowed to step sideways and smother when the player hasn’t moved off their line. The rules committee has wrecked the game.
Quote from: Rob Lannister
Yeah watched it again. Richmond player well over the mark and then tackles. Robbed.
Quote from: Rob Lannister
Gifted their first goal after bloke was done htb and then that goal review
Quote from: Ayden
Disgraceful umpiring. Every other time the ball goes though the goal players can push others to get it through
Quote from: Subloid
Tigers were paying the umpires. There was cash involved no doubt.
Quote from: Grant F
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FY-0R3BUIAUfRsq?format=jpg&name=medium)
Quote from: Ben
Richmond are 9th haha (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f604.png) classic.

https://twitter.com/AFL/status/1553651989027831809

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Rampsation on August 01, 2022, 09:09:58 AM
I almost peeed myself from laughter at the guy who wrote ... they were paying the umpires ... there was cash involved.

It was his use of the phrase "cash involved" thats put me into laughing fits.

Its just the image of some clandestine meeting in a dark alleyway with the cash changing hands lol.

Its taken me 5 minutes to write this post
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on August 02, 2022, 01:52:22 AM
Imagine starting a twitter account just to sook about Richmond  :lol.

Quote from: Areyouserious
Surely Balta gets a fine for this marvellous performance that completely defied the laws of physics? #badumpiring #AFL #AFLTigersLions

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FZCX6_RaAAAv5q8?format=jpg&name=large)
https://twitter.com/Wtfdideyejustc/status/1553909179169280000
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on August 02, 2022, 02:15:34 AM
Lol he sure made the umps see it haha
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: WilliamPowell on August 02, 2022, 09:48:56 AM
Obviously been well coached by Jack R.

 ;D
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on August 03, 2022, 06:48:16 PM
Noah Balta is now a Shooting Stars meme. I will never apologise for these

https://twitter.com/ethanmeldrum_/status/1554419709361106945
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: WilliamPowell on August 03, 2022, 08:11:14 PM
Noah Balta is now a Shooting Stars meme. I will never apologise for these

https://twitter.com/ethanmeldrum_/status/1554419709361106945

Maybe Noah will be able to find Dangerfield out there, somewhere  ;D
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on August 03, 2022, 08:12:21 PM
Lol they are funny let's be honest
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: JP Tiger on August 03, 2022, 08:58:12 PM
Noah Balta is now a Shooting Stars meme. I will never apologise for these

https://twitter.com/ethanmeldrum_/status/1554419709361106945

Maybe Noah will be able to find Dangerfield out there, somewhere  ;D
Yeah, turn left at planet Porkins ...    ;D
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Hard Roar Tiger on August 03, 2022, 09:13:40 PM
Imagine starting a twitter account just to sook about Richmond  :lol.

Quote from: Areyouserious
Surely Balta gets a fine for this marvellous performance that completely defied the laws of physics? #badumpiring #AFL #AFLTigersLions

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FZCX6_RaAAAv5q8?format=jpg&name=large)
https://twitter.com/Wtfdideyejustc/status/1553909179169280000

It looks like he pushed him in the back?
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on August 08, 2022, 05:25:04 AM
Quote from: Andrew White
Quote from: Rational Pies
Why did De Goey get a week for the exact same tackle earlier in the year?
Obvious. De Goey plays for Collingwood and Cotchin plays for Richmond. This is the only difference.
Quote from: Mike Fitzpatrick
Protected species.
Quote from: Jack
Cotchin biggest protected species in the game.
Quote from: Neil Brennan
Any other player, that’s a week. Just ask CJ.
Quote from: Geoff
Of course they have, crutch has his own rule book
Quote from: Chris Rodi
Cotchin is the most protected species in the AFL
Quote from: Eujin ooi
Of course he did. Guy is nearly untouchable with afl
Quote from: Benny
If his name rhymed with Bill Rayes, he would have got 2 weeks for this.
Quote from: skipzlfc
any other player and thats a week
Quote from: Mark
Trent crotchin is a protected species.
Quote from: Daniel Nicholls
Of course they have the filthy little sniper gets away with murder
Quote from: Teflon Snake (vibes)
Death, taxes and the MRO clearing Cotchin.
https://twitter.com/FootyonNine/status/1556203441029976064
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on August 11, 2022, 03:39:33 AM
Quote from: CFCFan
Too late for Cripps to legally change his name to Trent Cotchin?
https://twitter.com/CFCFan789/status/1556949417952849922
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Broadsword on August 11, 2022, 03:56:02 AM
Hard to believe people think the team consistently at the bottom of the free kick differential ladder for 5 seasons are somehow favoured by the umpires. But never let facts get in the way ...
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on August 18, 2022, 11:06:42 PM
Quote from: O
Really 5 years after 1 good year, must be the Rioli name getting the extra 3 years
Quote from: Alpha2
not the way AFL contracts are defined ... don't get too smug Richmond... he could be at North Melbourne in no time... seems contract law is not a thing amongst clubs~~~~~
Quote from: craig gobbie
How do Richmond afford this....?
Quote from: peter
5 years for that spud (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f954.png) (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f602.png)
https://twitter.com/7AFL/status/1560049904269271041
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Assange Tiger 😎 on August 19, 2022, 12:29:28 AM
Too much time on your hands OE. Craig gobbie, alpha, 0 and Peter...:lol
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on August 20, 2022, 11:36:37 PM
Quote from: kevin munro
Settle down everyone. It’s Cotchin, nothing to see here. Richmond are playing finals. You don’t think the AFL are going to do anything abnormal here.
Quote from: Anna Firth
Cotchin is a protected species. Disgusting umpiring #AFLDonsTigers
Quote from: Henry Ross
I have turned off before I smash my TV- I am not a Bomber or Tiger fan but like to see a good game - this was 💩 & the umpiring double 💩 Cotchin has them bluffed + bewildering frees going the Tigers way finished me - Can the finals get professional umpires to run ??
Quote from: NEWERA⚫️🔴⚫️🔴BOMBERS
Who’s more protected….Pendlebury / Cotchin or Selwood??
Quote from: James Rogerson
Soft as butter free… Cotchin and Bolton love playing for cheap.. don’t have hard ball gets in them
Quote from: NEWERA⚫️🔴⚫️🔴BOMBERS
FFS ….we are outclassed but the umpires have just gone after 1/2 time…..f*** you all, it’s our time too shine. Oh and every time Cotchin goes near the ball, give him a free kick
Quote from: Craig Byron
If Ginnivan stays low after getting the ball, then lifts his arm when tackled it’s talked about for weeks, Cotchin does it and it’s not even mentioned.  🙄#AFLDonsTigers
Quote from: Mysie Deacs
If Ginnivan did that he’d be crucified. Cotchin dropped the shoulder low in that tackle and gets a free. NOT A SINGLE WORD from the commentators. #aflbomberstigers
Quote from: Coach✨Craig
Ask Cotchin, the grub. (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f624.png) (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f624.png)
Quote from: Billy
WOW, terribly SOFT freek kick to Sniper Cotchin.   AFL and Umpires ruined our once great game.
https://twitter.com/search?q=Cotchin&src=trend_click&f=live&vertical=trends
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on August 21, 2022, 05:11:05 AM
Quote from: Donslaught9
Richmond sponsored by NIB? Definitely changing my health insurer over the pre-season.
Quote from: efc1robbo
I so badly want Richmond to get out week 1 of the finals. No I want it to be courtesy of the weakest softest free possible
Quote from: barnz
dima has darth sidious vibes
Quote from: abracadraper
Every game vs the tiges is the same

Hard fought contest then umps gifting their fwds to break game open
Quote from: Serenity_Now
■■■■ Richmond. How many ■■■■■■■ times do they just push players over?
Quote from: RedNBlackEyed
On a positive note, the umps still hate us. And Richmond are nowhere near a flag this year.

F*** them both.
Quote from: Heptides
For lynch get free kicks for being looked at?
Quote from: 6_monfries_and_coke
F*** off Reiwoldt. You sook. Just retire you selfish prick you have never been as good as your cousin .
Your keeping a young bloke out of the side cause your so selfish
Quote from: Donslaught9
I want to see Jack Riewoldt tears when he misses an after the siren goal during the finals series that eliminates his club.
Quote from: alex.f.94
Can someone just deck Bolton and Cotchin into oblivion
Quote from: 6_monfries_and_coke
Lynch 0 goals ,so how is laverde getting towelled up? Seriously some people on here are unbelievably stupid
Quote from: James98
I ■■■■■■■ hate Tom lynch
Quote from: donut
Can someone drop lynch ffs
Quote from: Donslaught9
WTF?

Cumberland too.

Seriously? He’ll be playing at Craigieburn in like two years.
Quote from: mcewanc2
To make this fun how old are you now and how old were you when we last beat Richmond?
https://discourse.bomberblitz.com/t/game-day-v-other-sash-round-23-2022/27176/1714
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: julzqld on August 21, 2022, 10:14:15 AM
The comment about Jack not being as good as his cousin - umm 3 premierships and 3 Coleman’s don’t count?
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: WilliamPowell on August 21, 2022, 10:49:51 AM
I like Donslaught9 comment about NIB.

We've been sponsored by them since 2018 and he has just noticed now.

 I thank him for contributing to our sponsorship for the last 5 years 👏👏👏👏
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Damo on August 21, 2022, 11:55:35 AM
The comment about Jack not being as good as his cousin - umm 3 premierships and 3 Coleman’s don’t count?

Regardless, Nick was a freak
It’s hardly an insult even if he isn’t as good

It’s like the famous sledge the pommy cricketer gave Mark Waugh
“That’s true, but at least in the best player in my family”
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on August 23, 2022, 07:28:02 PM
Geelong supporter ringing SEN sayn Lynch goes missing in big games (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f926-200d-2642-fe0f.png). He has a short memory.

https://twitter.com/goonercris/status/1561900853929263105
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Hard Roar Tiger on August 23, 2022, 09:57:47 PM
The comment about Jack not being as good as his cousin - umm 3 premierships and 3 Coleman’s don’t count?

Regardless, Nick was a freak
It’s hardly an insult even if he isn’t as good

It’s like the famous sledge the pommy cricketer gave Mark Waugh
“That’s true, but at least in the best player in my family”

More goals, more flags, more colemans ….. I’d take Jack’s career
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on August 24, 2022, 12:45:08 AM
The comment about Jack not being as good as his cousin - umm 3 premierships and 3 Coleman’s don’t count?

Regardless, Nick was a freak
It’s hardly an insult even if he isn’t as good

It’s like the famous sledge the pommy cricketer gave Mark Waugh
“That’s true, but at least in the best player in my family”

More goals, more flags, more colemans ….. I’d take Jack’s career

With more premierships reckon Nick would take Jack's career
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on August 31, 2022, 05:53:32 AM
Quote from: floros_59
Enough of (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f92c.png) Dusty and Richmond, you would think Richmond is the only club playing finals.
Quote from: floros_59
Lets not make this finals all about Dusty and Richmond.
Quote from: floros_59
Dusty was a great player but he’s cocked, Don’t forget Dusty was a nothing before he became a star.Ginnivan is only 19  tell me what was Dusty like at 19.
Quote from: floros_59
Great more Dusty news! (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f971.png) (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f971.png)
Quote from: floros_59
2022 finals are here and everyone is making it all about Richmond and Dusty, bunch of idiots!!
Quote from: floros_59
Jack [Riewoldt] sure likes talking crap .(https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f923.png) (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f923.png)
https://twitter.com/floros_59/with_replies

Quote from: AFL
A tackle that will be remembered by @Richmond_FC fans for a very long time

Townsend tackle on Crouch in 2017 GF: https://twitter.com/AFL/status/1564391022926303235
Quote from: Dylan C
free kick Crouch
Quote from: BeltwayAussie
This. All the talk about tigers pressure - it came from them not getting any frees called on them regardless of what they did
https://twitter.com/AFL/status/1564391022926303235
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Broadsword on August 31, 2022, 06:57:55 AM
Lol, yeah, Dusty was just an average player before he won THREE NORM SMITH MEDALS.

Who cares how good he was before he won THREE NORM SMITH MEDALS.

Why? Because HE WON THREE NORM SMITH MEDALS!

It's like saying Einstein was still in school before he revolutionized physics. Who the stuff cares?

(It's also definitionally true: before someone is exceptional they are, by definition, unexceptional, which is itself a rather unexceptional thing to say.)
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on August 31, 2022, 09:17:41 AM
Dusty was awesome at 19 lol.

Averaged 20 disposals, 3.5 tackles and 0.5 goals in his debut season.

Even Daicos this year has averaged only higher possessions but less goals and tackles, despite being the best first year player I've seen since...I dunno, Dusty?
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on August 31, 2022, 09:18:07 AM
Also what the heck do they think Townsend should have been penalised for with that tackle? Haha
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: lamington on August 31, 2022, 09:23:52 AM
Dusty was a jet from the very first season! He gave Scott Thompson a don’t argue as a teenager! Not to mention kicking goals!
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on September 02, 2022, 05:58:00 AM
Quote from: Daniel
The problem is though certain umpires are clearly on the pay role of Richmond. The keep the total free kick down but with how many bad calls are made in Richmond's favour and in a scoring area I'd a joke. This was the correct call. Shouldn't of been given a goal.
Quote from: Frederick Shaibani
Sook harder, Hardwick. Lol you've had MORE than your fair share of calls go your way this season!
#freekickrichmond
Quote from: CFC for Life
KARMA
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FblELqIaUAApMvo?format=jpg&name=medium)
Quote from: Cgull
You now know what St.Kilda suffers ever year
https://twitter.com/FOXFOOTY/status/1565345658550497283
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on September 02, 2022, 03:29:49 PM
The Richmond haters have really come out of the woodwork since last night.

Including the editor of the AFL Record, Ashley Browne ::).

Quote from: Ashley Browne
Salty Richmond fans makes for great content doesn’t it?

#AFLFinals
https://twitter.com/hashbrowne/status/1565314306970816512
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on September 02, 2022, 05:05:59 PM
Let them hate F them
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on September 07, 2022, 06:06:27 PM
Quote from: Matt
No other club can do that. Sell out the G against an interstate team #GoPies
https://twitter.com/Mattys123/status/1567054021571248129

(https://www.dictionary.com/e/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Thinking_Face_Emoji-Emoji-Island.png)
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: rogerd3 on September 07, 2022, 08:30:04 PM
Quote from: Matt
No other club can do that. Sell out the G against an interstate team #GoPies
https://twitter.com/Mattys123/status/1567054021571248129

(https://www.dictionary.com/e/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Thinking_Face_Emoji-Emoji-Island.png)

That bloke is your A typical colonwood dill.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on September 09, 2022, 09:20:23 AM
Quote from: millagurnzie1
It won’t get done. Personally I think Taranto doesn’t get to Richmond…I think he’ll have to find somewhere else.

Hopefully the Bombers (https://discourse.bomberblitz.com/images/emoji/twitter/+1.png?v=12)
Quote from: darkknightpheonix
you also have to laugh at the fact the more the afl does to try and even the comp, the more it just ends up favouring the teams that are in their success window.

how can a side that won 3 out of the 4 comps 2 years ago be able to afford 2 highly rated players, and geelong will continue to get highly rated players.

gotta love it.
Quote from: millagurnzie1
Taranto and Hopper ain’t that good…plus they’re basically the same player. They’ll get in each-others way
Quote from: millagurnzie1
They’re not worth what Richmond are going to have to pay (like Essendon with Shiel)
Quote from: Clark_Griswold
I’ve tried to think through which players are now redundant at Richmond…Dow, RCD, Ross, Graham???..I can’t say I’m interested in any of them.
Quote from: Saucy
When are we going to have our time??

When is it Essendon’s time??

https://discourse.bomberblitz.com/t/2022-trade-speculation-part-2/26887/4506
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on October 03, 2022, 06:34:11 PM
Quote from: RayCapogreco
GWS and GC really just preparing players for Richmond
#afltrade
Quote from: Arron ⚓️
We’ll join that party too mate. Corbett, Sharp possibly coming
Quote from: Matt Taylor ⚓
Big difference between top 5 players regularly heading to Vic clubs and VFL players heading west
https://twitter.com/RayJCapo79/status/1576801211726303232
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on October 11, 2022, 05:06:38 PM
Quote from: Jack
how the f*** we didnt get a single player for hopper
Quote from: rickpowell
F*** #JacobHopper, never liked him anyway.
Quote from: Steven
What a joke this is
Quote from: Stakes
GWS deserve to lose players when they fold that easily
Absolute shambles
Quote from: Sebastian Townsend
So Richmond don’t have any picks for the next 5 years lol.
Quote from: Taylor Silver
Can’t wait for the Richmond Geelong 2023 AFL GF… (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f92e.png) #AFLTrade
Quote from: eli8te
Should change the AFL to VFL - Richmond and Geelong here our robbing teams
https://twitter.com/search?q=afltrade
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on December 06, 2022, 06:59:39 PM
(Pies fan)
Quote from: Fadge

Conversely, Richmond are way overhyped and will struggle to make the 8. Yesterday's heroes, who took advantage of the weakest era in the history of the AFL (credit to them for doing so) are done.

(Cats fan)
Quote from: CharacterFirst

Richmond are full of excuses and a very negative culture set by the coach. Theretime is over.

(Cats fan)
Quote from: caveman72

If Dustys not back to his best Tiggers will be out of the 8. Lions will have a betters season regardless of how Dusty plays

(Cats fan)
Quote from: STPer18

Meanwhile the Tigs traded out of multiple drafts for some B-grade GWS off-casts - you'd be crossing everything you don't bundle it for a third straight year - it's now or never.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on December 06, 2022, 08:42:22 PM
Taranto and Hopper B grade lol.

They were mad keen on Hopper until he flipped them the bird!

Love the salt.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: WilliamPowell on December 06, 2022, 09:03:53 PM
Poor Cats fans, they must be worried.

Very worried  :lol
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on December 13, 2022, 08:27:07 PM
Quote from: catscollector
Richmond could afford the luxury of countering and changing how the 'status quo' were playing. There were no teams of genuine quality around to come up with answers.
The one team that showed they could do so was Collingwood. Strangely enough, the same team who tried to stand up to Brisbane during their glory days and Geelong throughout 08-11.

Richmond are not a dynasty at all. They were a great team no different to North Melbourne or Adelaide of the late 90's.

A dynasty is a team who can stand the test of time. Brisbane were playing finals every year from 1998-2004. Geelong played finals every year from 2007-2014. Hawthorn were playing finals every year 2010-2016.

Richmond were up from 2017-2020*. They were back again in 2022 and quickly exited in the opening week (likely never to be seen again for years on end).

Quote from: catscollector
2011 Collingwood would have beaten any one of the Richmond GF teams. They actually had legit taggers and excellent mid sized defenders to curtail the likes of Martin & Bolton.
Superior ruck stocks to anything Richmond faced versus a washed up Mumford or a Rhys Stanley.

Only area they would have struggled was key post. Lynch and Riewoldt would have had their way but at the same time, there's a reason why Collingwood averaged 117 points per game and only 70 points against.

Quote from: rye
the criteria for a dynasty is a 3peat

its true because i said so

do not mention richmond in the same category as brisbane 01-03 or hawthorn 13-15. you are not a dynasty

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/who-will-be-better-in-2023-richmond-or-brisbane.1340024/page-37
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tiger Khosh on December 14, 2022, 02:10:45 AM
Lol that same great feeling dynasty who never once managed to defend their premiership and go back to back? Can debate on and on who would win a hypothetical matchup that could never actually come to pass - I personally always side on the later team as the games constantly evolving with coaching, training, skill set, etc. Dynasties have always been defined as 3 flags in a short period of time, they hate Richmond so much they wanna move the goal posts. Also not sure why he’s saying we were only playing finals from 17-20, i know we were wannabees at this stage but we still made finals 2013-15, missed 16, then 17-20, missed 21 and then 22 again. That’s 8 finals appearances in 10 seasons (with hopefully more to come) and 3 flags.

As far as the cats goes, we had 3 flags in 4 seasons and they had 3 in 5 seasons. We went back to back, they never managed to go back to back. We won all of ours in an 18 team comp while they won theirs in a 16-17 team comp. We also had to put up with being shifted down the draft order due to the concessions that the suns and later the giants got and so the bulk of our premiership players were taken in compromised drafts.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on December 14, 2022, 10:38:36 AM
Would love to see our best dynasty team again Hawks and Lions.

Lions to me were indestructible.

Hawks I don't think had great opposition myself.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on December 26, 2022, 04:05:50 PM
Quote from: RUNVS
Richmond won their premierships in a really weak era. It is why the teams they played in their Grand Finals were up for a season or two at most. They (GWS, Adelaide etc) were not up there because they were good, they were up there because the previous heavyweight teams (Hawthorn, Geelong, Sydney and Fremantle) were all in decline.
Quote from: RUNVS
Richmond's gameplan could be picked apart by good foot skills. A 2013 to 2015 Hawthorn team would have destroyed them as they would have picked apart Richmond and Richmond would not have been able to force that many turnovers.
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/richmond-2017-20-v-hawthorn-2012-15.1342062/
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tiger Khosh on December 26, 2022, 05:08:59 PM
2013-15 Hawthorn struggled with 2013-15 Richmond.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Jonesracing82 on December 26, 2022, 11:45:49 PM
2013-15 Hawthorn struggled with 2013-15 Richmond.
Roles were reversed in 17-20 & they couldn't get near us.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on December 27, 2022, 08:21:53 AM
Nonsense, Geelong has been up continuously.
GWS were for several years also, prelim '17, SF '18, GF '19.

Only the crows fell off the face of the planet and if you ask me that was because of their stupid training camp.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Broadsword on December 27, 2022, 08:39:33 AM
Having opposition supporters hopelessly try to discredit our 3 flags in 4 years is a problem I really wanted to have 5 years ago. It all just serves as a reminder of how brilliant it's been
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: wayne on December 27, 2022, 10:54:13 AM
Geelol were Sham, while we were Secretariat. 2017 QF was the Kentucky Derby, the 2019 PF was the Preakness and the 2020 GF was the Belmont Stakes.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on December 27, 2022, 06:20:08 PM
Quote from: Herne Hammer Hill
When all is said and done, Richmond are really no different to the likes of GWS and GC, a bakelite franchise who weren't even a foundation club.

You Tiggies can tell me that your club has won more flags and while that is true, it's something that Geelong can always change, what can't ever change is that fact that the Tiggies are blow ins to the comp.

As far as the thread goes, wouldn't have beaten 2011 Geelong.
Quote from: Herne Hammer Hill
Allowed to join the league with the mighty University in 1908 after the league had been running since 1897, you can sugar coat if all you like but the fact remains that Richmond are not a foundation club, they are blow ins.
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/richmonds-2017-20-dynasty-would-have-beaten-every-other-premiership-side-of-the-2010s.1341831/page-14
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on December 27, 2022, 07:42:51 PM
Lol damn we've only been in the league 114 years. Blow ins haha
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: MintOnLamb on December 27, 2022, 10:21:52 PM
How many clubs blew in after us??
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: WilliamPowell on December 28, 2022, 08:25:17 AM
How many clubs blew in after us??

2

Footscray and N0rt
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on December 28, 2022, 11:38:13 AM
Plus Eagles, Crows, Dockers, Power, Suns, Giants.

So that's about 8 teams.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Broadsword on December 28, 2022, 12:40:20 PM
Hawthorn?
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on December 28, 2022, 01:18:51 PM
Geelong didn't play in the VFL during some of the war years (1916, 1942-43). So technically they rejoined the comp in 1944 :shh.

We're one of only three clubs that have played in every season since 1908. Carlton & Collingwood the only two to have played every season since the inception of the VFL in 1897.

How many clubs blew in after us??
1925 - Dogs, Haw, North.
1987 - Eagles (Bears also but they merged with Fitzroy)
1991 - Crows
1995 - Freo
1997 - Port
2011 - Suns
2012 - GWS
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Jonesracing82 on December 30, 2022, 12:53:42 AM
So what that GeeLOL fan is actually saying is that while they have been in the comp longer, they still have less flags than "blow in's" like us & hawks?
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Broadsword on December 30, 2022, 02:06:44 PM
I'm guessing said baby isn't a big fan of immigrants either. At the end of the day they're just blow-ins. One of the weirder sooks I've seen.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on December 31, 2022, 12:21:47 AM
Star Tiger recruit Tim Taranto confident in the premiership hunt
https://www.facebook.com/7NEWSMelbourne/videos/547130643965020

Quote from: Ricky Nixon
Tell him he's dreaming
Quote from: Ian Ringrose
Yeah jump ship from the team that drafted you for your own personal glory not a good person
Quote from: Darren Radin
Cause Taranto and Hopper gave GWS such great success...theyre rotation players at best
Quote from: Adam Hankin
taranto and hopper are average players at best. not like your getting petracca and oliver from melbourne.
Quote from: Lenny Leneva
Tigers are cooked to old and slow
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on January 01, 2023, 12:25:56 AM
Taranto and Hopper are rotation players lol
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on January 03, 2023, 10:35:21 PM
Quote from: rhys9483
[Cumberland] just a snippet of richmond’s youth
Quote from: Dontomatios
He's f***** 23 cooked Richmond nuffys
Quote from: sov839
He's 21 wtf are you talking about haha

Quote from: BrisbaneLionsPremiers2023
what about that kick after siren

oh wait LOL

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=woNTvzAR2Ic
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on January 09, 2023, 05:22:04 PM
AFL's facebook page re-posted the last two minutes of last year's Elim Final.

Quote from: Konner Humphrys
Richmond loses Australia wins
Quote from: Sandra Gratten
Can’t be a Season without Richmond having a whinge.
Quote from: Gloria Knowles
What a game seeing Tigers get beat.
Quote from: Lindsay Fels
Oh where from ti.. oh wait they lost (https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/images/emoji.php/v9/tab/1.5/16/1f923.png)
Quote from: Liz Lawrie
Best game ever - I watch the last 2 minutes every night so I go to bed happy!
https://www.facebook.com/AFL/videos/1251971608995454/
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on January 17, 2023, 05:42:47 PM
Quote from: Andy Fossil
There is something wrong with the trade system that Richmond gave up high teen picks for two top 10 draftees as they were the only ones they had. If they went to North, GWS would have demanded a top 10 pick for each
https://twitter.com/1116sen/status/1614796829182287875
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on January 18, 2023, 02:52:54 PM
Quote from: South of the Yarra
We own the Tigers. Always have Always Will. They have just never been able to compete with us head to head
Premierships vs each other Collingwood 4 Richmond 2
Most recent finals win - Collingwood
Richmond haven't beaten Collingwood in a final in 42 years.
Head to Head - Collingwood 120 Richmond 92
Total score against each other Collingwood 2565.2765 Richmond 2411.2587
We own nearly every crowd record they desperately want

A really one sided rivalry due to our dominance over them.
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/collingwood-richmond-is-it-a-one-way-or-two-way-rivalry.1323744/page-11#post-77749039
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on January 18, 2023, 02:58:23 PM
So just need to beat them for the next 28 games and win by 5.5 goals in the process  ;D
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tiger Khosh on January 19, 2023, 12:05:04 AM
Tell old mate that 11 of the pies 15 flags came 87 years or more ago including the 4 against us that apparently make it a 1 sided rivalry. They’ve won 1 more flag in the last 87 years than we have in the last 6………
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: MintOnLamb on January 19, 2023, 05:44:38 AM
Tell old mate that 11 of the pies 15 flags came 87 years or more ago including the 4 against us that apparently make it a 1 sided rivalry. They’ve won 1 more flag in the last 87 years than we have in the last 6………
But remember we are just blow ins…
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on January 22, 2023, 04:20:30 PM
Quote from: timokane
Collingwood have the fame and like aura and like love the feral tag and have embraced it and love kind of like it doesnt matter to them.
Richmond are just pricks and like more in your face when winning but crawl under their rocks when losing.
Collingwood are more honest and like it like doesnt matter what others think about then tigers are like get all upset and sooky if you call them something.
Its like water off a ducks back for the Pies.
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/collingwood-and-richmond-who-has-the-more-feral-supporter-base.1324586/post-77787081
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tiger Khosh on January 22, 2023, 04:31:17 PM
That was a tough read lol
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on January 24, 2023, 01:13:23 AM
That guys full name is Tim Kane Cornes

You know it makes sense
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Broadsword on January 24, 2023, 02:35:45 AM
I've seldom seen such mastery of the simile. It's like nothing I've ever seen before.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on January 24, 2023, 07:25:26 PM
Quote from: RUNVS
Taranto and Hopper are both rather overrated.
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/have-geelong-and-richmond-destroyed-the-sa-clubs.1343732/page-2

Quote from: Jack The GodFather
Let's see how Martin goes when he's 33/34 ... As a forward in a side that was smashed.
Quote from: catscollector
Richmond won't be playing finals by the time he gets to that age.
It's a shame because like all athletes, his averages would have taken a hit in the latter stages of his career.

He probably would have been smart to go to Sydney as they will be playing finals regularly for the next few years and with so many crafty forwards, Martin could have hanged out the back of packs and padded those goals stats.
Quote from: Jack The GodFather
Quote from: catscollector
Martin could have hanged out the back of packs and padded those goals stats.
That's virtually what he does now.
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/if-dustin-martin-wins-a-4th-norm-smith-medal-and-premiership-will-he-be-regarded-as-the-greatest-player-of-all-time.1341391/page-141#post-77801778
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: JP Tiger on January 24, 2023, 07:54:57 PM
I love these sooky la la posts from opposition supporters, especially the Geelong fans who wanted Dusty to go to Sydney to stat pad. 

As if Sydney don't have enough of those types already ...     :P

Irony is when Geelong supporters want players on big bucks to stat pad ...     :P
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on January 25, 2023, 06:45:43 PM
Quote from: Elmer_Judd
The biggest rivalry these days is Richmond vs the Rest/opposition supporters (least on the Internet

Ever since I joined the online community, only Essendon supporters late 90s/early-mid 00s) come close to the sheer insufferable smugness, Petty gloating and childish baiting that Tiger fans have indulged in (not just here but on social media too) in tbe last 5 years

The fact I was happy as a passionate Carlton supporter that Collingwood whipped them in the 2018 prelim final speaks volumes.
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/collingwood-richmond-is-it-a-one-way-or-two-way-rivalry.1323744/post-77800790
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Damo on January 25, 2023, 09:49:42 PM
The fact you are a passionate Carlton supporter does speak volumes
Effwit alert
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on January 30, 2023, 02:41:42 PM
Quote from: Gavin Excell
This is the real nut of it all

Tiger fans hate Geelong because we stole "their" flag.

Echoes of trump

Quote from: Gavin Excell
If we delve deeper into the fragile tiger psyche, the realisation that the industry regards their style as workmanlike and ugly compared to other more highly regarded teams is hard to accept.

The chip on the shoulder inadequacy grows larger each day and manifests itself in threads such as this. Freud would have a field day with Tiger fans

Quote from: Jack the Godfather
Stengle could have made the difference. It makes you wonder how their talent spotters could get it so wrong.

It just goes to show what a decent culture can do for a kid.
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/if-dustin-martin-wins-a-4th-norm-smith-medal-and-premiership-will-he-be-regarded-as-the-greatest-player-of-all-time.1341391/page-153
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Broadsword on January 30, 2023, 03:14:56 PM
Richmond's DNA going back to the 1800s is workmanlike. Nothing could make us prouder I'm sure than to be confirmed as a workmanlike club. We earned every premiership we ever won. (We certainly didn't need a host of rule changes to get it done.)

Not sure what Freud's preoccupations with sexual libido and the Oedipal complex have to do with anything, but stoopid is as stoopid does.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tiger Khosh on January 30, 2023, 06:31:05 PM
Lol Geelong supporters. We beat them on the way to 3 flags including once in the grand final and they think we are the inadequate ones…..
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on January 31, 2023, 09:24:17 PM
Man that is funny. Us worried about being perceived as workman like and playing ugly after 3 premierships playing that way
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 03, 2023, 08:09:14 PM
Quote from: aflcentral
Still crazy this happened three times in a four year period with all of them finals matches

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fn8BCCIaQAAzp5y?format=jpg&name=medium) (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fn8BCCJaMAAcVQq?format=jpg&name=medium) (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fn8BCCJakAIso-L?format=jpg&name=medium)


Quote from: Darren J Ray
Looking forward to when Geelong play their home finals not at the lower ranked opposition's instead. Might be a different story.

Quote from: mattkernahan_
Use to like Richmond when they were humble as the underdogs, they got egos when they started winning tho. Lowkey wished they stayed humble

Quote from: darcyjscott
None of these scoreboards are because of “Richmond” they were all because of “Dustin Martin”

Quote from: jack.treg
2020 Mickey Mouse grand final

Quote from: bbyxnnl
Almost like the Umpires didn’t have any influence at all 👏

Quote from: ksbasset
Tiger fans trying to make themselves relevant again

Quote from: geelong__memes
These matches were played during the Stone Age

Quote from: jibber_d
They still don’t shut up even after 3 years

Quote from: scottmelon
Without Dusty Richmond don't win either the prelim or grand final. Both we wasted chances but he was the only reason they got back into it and won it

https://www.instagram.com/p/CoJ9IFthq9k/?hl=en
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Jonesracing82 on February 04, 2023, 08:10:24 PM
Quote from: Elmer_Judd
The biggest rivalry these days is Richmond vs the Rest/opposition supporters (least on the Internet

Ever since I joined the online community, only Essendon supporters late 90s/early-mid 00s) come close to the sheer insufferable smugness, Petty gloating and childish baiting that Tiger fans have indulged in (not just here but on social media too) in tbe last 5 years

The fact I was happy as a passionate Carlton supporter that Collingwood whipped them in the 2018 prelim final speaks volumes.
Yet another thread about Richmond started by a Cats fan & the thread itself has nothing whatsoever to do with Geelong. They obsessed with us....
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/collingwood-richmond-is-it-a-one-way-or-two-way-rivalry.1323744/post-77800790
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 06, 2023, 01:50:15 AM
Football. You gotta love it!

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FoMqtkWaQAACKca?format=jpg&name=900x900)
https://twitter.com/smwright1965/status/1622187259473846273
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 06, 2023, 12:46:51 PM
Quote from: "Law1770
I love that they still can’t beat the Kangas - Always have been ‘Our Bunny’! (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f602.png) (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f602.png) (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f602.png)
https://twitter.com/Law17701/status/1622406275471671296
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: mightytiges on February 06, 2023, 08:20:52 PM
"I didn't really enjoy watching Richmond anymore, so I changed to Cats."

https://twitter.com/7NewsMelbourne/status/1622503023464546304


Changing teams was a definite no-no when I was that age. Any kid that tried it would cop it from the other kids. No one likes a bandwagoner who jumps off one club and onto the reigning premiers.

#BackInMyDay :oldguy



Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 08, 2023, 09:51:03 PM
(https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/attachments/1675734863703-png.1601672/)
(https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/attachments/1675734902669-png.1601674/)
(https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/attachments/1675734953630-png.1601676/)
(https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/attachments/1675735012674-png.1601678/)
https://www.facebook.com/AFL/posts/pfbid02nipwjL39u8LLjemPCwdEzCNxajoYNVknVTMUstsQih9Bm6Mw7fHa3VcRKPdzLYt6l


(https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/attachments/1675744173426-png.1601779/)
(https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/attachments/1675744188404-png.1601781/)
(https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/attachments/1675744203881-png.1601782/)
(https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/attachments/1675744210574-png.1601783/)
(https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/attachments/1675744226105-png.1601785/)
(https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/attachments/1675744237179-png.1601786/)
https://www.facebook.com/7AFL/posts/pfbid02GZibJAZdHuJ3FF8PgS9kfUgFdAJrN7jKyKWmWVxLXiVfgYSehchE6ixPpm4i8hUNl
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tiger Khosh on February 08, 2023, 11:05:46 PM
Geez social media is such a cesspool.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 12, 2023, 04:12:34 AM
Quote from: Brent King
Kingy , I just couldn’t cope with another Richmond flag . I just can’t bear the thought of it

Quote from: paul panetta
tigers about to be embarrassed in round 1
https://twitter.com/davidking34/status/1624226666859106317
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 12, 2023, 07:29:49 PM
Quote from: Daniel
I doubt the tigers will finish in the 8 this season.
Quote from: WayneMcInerney
Talk me through richmond optimism? They've been awful for 2 years and all their best players (minus Bolton) are well last there best footy #headscratcher
https://twitter.com/kanecornes/status/1624603630589607937
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 13, 2023, 03:01:49 AM
Quote from: Trav 20
But Martin has never had 30 disposals in a final. He's just played that little bit better than his teammates in a few grand finals. A great feat no doubt, but he also happened to be the best player in a team that wasn't chock full of stars, so not completely out of the odds (I know you like those).

It brings me back to the eye test. We marvel at the feats of the greatest who've ever played. High marks, long kicks, skill, speed, toughness and a host of other elements separate the greats from mere mortals. How could the greatest player of all time not be capable of marking on other people's shoulders ? But but goal assists. LOL
Quote from: Trav 20
Richmond fans don't seem to get that Martin isn't physically capable of doing a quarter of the things SNR did for fun.

When I say I've seen heaps of players better than Martin it's never more evident than in a video like this.

Martin is a great player who's had a profound influence on many of the most important games ''he's'' played in, but when it comes to individual feats on a footy field he's nowhere near some of the greats of our game.

Waddling around and kicking some great timely goals in grand finals doesn't suddenly mean you're the greatest player who's laced a boot.
Quote from: Trav 20
The best players in history have been either the competition's best ''coalface'' midfielders or key forwards.

Martin is neither.

Does his body of work in finals elevate him above the best key forwars or mids ? Not even close.
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/if-dustin-martin-wins-a-4th-norm-smith-medal-and-premiership-will-he-be-regarded-as-the-greatest-player-of-all-time.1341391/page-176
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on February 13, 2023, 11:28:20 AM
Non Richmond supporters will not have watched every Richmond game so cannot be certain of Martin's influence, week in week out, in home and away games.

Every Richmond supporter knows how good Martin is and it is a pleasure to have watched him weave his magic...usually right when we need his magic
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 13, 2023, 01:32:51 PM
Quote from: SEN
GREATEST TEAM OF THE 21ST CENTURY!

Starting this Tuesday, we will begin a 32-team bracket to crown the best AFL team since 2000!

You'll be able to vote here on Twitter & on our Insta stories.

Check out the bracket below. Stay tuned!

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FolDVgTaMAAPTO6?format=jpg&name=large)

Quote from: leeroylatham
Certainly won't be any of the Richmond sides lol...weakest premiership teams ever
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 15, 2023, 07:41:38 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fo-kcEbaQAIFnJN?format=jpg&name=medium)

Quote from: Port Adelaide Fan Forever
WHY IS PORT LOSING THIS VOTE (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f621.png) (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f621.png) (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f621.png) (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f621.png) (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/26a1.png) (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/26a1.png)

Quote from: Port Adelaide Fan Forever
I'll just leave this here

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fo-4xw_akAAAK4v?format=jpg&name=small)
https://twitter.com/1116sen/status/1625626077933731848
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tiger Khosh on February 15, 2023, 11:18:08 PM
Oh wow they had a higher %  :clapping
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on February 16, 2023, 10:07:28 AM
They got belted in a prelim lol

Similar season to us in 2018 really. You don't see us bragging about that season...
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tiger Khosh on February 16, 2023, 10:41:28 AM
They got belted in a prelim lol

Similar season to us in 2018 really. You don't see us bragging about that season...

Oh man didn’t even see it was their 02 side, thought it was their 04 side. Why are they even comparing non premiers with premiers? Port finish 3rd, 1st and 1st from 01-03 and their finals record during that time was 2-6 - there’s a reason they were known as chokers until they finally broke through in 04 against a Brisbane side that had to play a home prelim final at the MCG for some reason.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on February 16, 2023, 02:37:41 PM
They got belted in a prelim lol

Similar season to us in 2018 really. You don't see us bragging about that season...

Oh man didn’t even see it was their 02 side, thought it was their 04 side. Why are they even comparing non premiers with premiers? Port finish 3rd, 1st and 1st from 01-03 and their finals record during that time was 2-6 - there’s a reason they were known as chokers until they finally broke through in 04 against a Brisbane side that had to play a home prelim final at the MCG for some reason.

Yep and they were going for their 4th straight so were probably tired, beat up, less fire in the guts.

2002 pffft nobody remembers minor premierships.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 18, 2023, 07:57:29 PM
Quote from: HeraldSun
Dustin Martin is the best AFL player of this century writes Mark Robinson - do you agree?

Quote from: Freo ⚓ Pope
*impact in grand finals. He's been average to poor in five wk 1 finals and was not fully fit in the prelim final loss to Mason Cox.
Quote from: Matt
Martin had a great 3-4 years but has been mostly inconsistent outside of that.
Quote from: Kris D
Would he be as good if the umpires paid free kicks against him every time he fends someone off by making contact with their neck/face/head?
Quote from: major tom
Quote from: TigerKing
Hard to beat 3 norm smiths… the best player in the biggest games!
Only 1 truly deserved
https://twitter.com/heraldsunsport/status/1626669355273715714
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 20, 2023, 06:47:41 PM
Quote from: SEN1116
THE GREATEST AFL TEAM SINCE 2000 TOURNAMENT!

Round 1 Match-Up:
Port Adelaide (2004) versus Richmond (2020)

Who advances to the second round?

Quote from: Joel Greer
Port easily here. It was a proper season after all.
Quote from: JayFry
Hubs don’t count.
Quote from: Port Adelaide Fan Forever
PORT BEAT ONE OF THE BEST DYSTANSTY TEAMS IN HISTORY IN 2004 PORT SHOULD BE WINNING RICHMOND HARDLY WON THE PREMIERSHIP IN 2020
Quote from: Adam Spurling
More a popularity contest than anything. Port 04 poos all over Richmond 2020
https://twitter.com/1116sen/status/1627429772333809664
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on February 21, 2023, 01:02:47 AM
Really?

I reckon Port wasn't a great team in 04.

They beat a dynasty team running out of puff for sure.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on February 21, 2023, 09:21:14 AM
Really?

I reckon Port wasn't a great team in 04.

They beat a dynasty team running out of puff for sure.

They had a player by the name of Hardwick who was destined for greatness. So they have a link to greatness.....sure a tenuous link but a link all the same

You know it makes sense
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 21, 2023, 02:59:40 PM
2nd round match-ups for anyone who cares.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FpcOWWVaUAEULFV?format=jpg&name=large)
https://twitter.com/1116sen/status/1627785982132232200
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 24, 2023, 03:07:56 AM
Quote from: SEN1116
“It’s not fair”: Tigers detail push to end members’ ‘injustice’ at the ‘G.

Quote from: Mark Windram
Lucky you guys always get a home grand final even if you don't deserve it then
Quote from: The All-Father
Richmond peeing and moaning about 'fair' while they're getting home finals against teams that finish well above them (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f602.png)
Quote from: matedwards78
Neither is your home ground hosting the GF every year (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f602.png)
Quote from: Chad Leverington
vic club talking about MCG injustice. lolz taking the pee now
https://twitter.com/1116sen/status/1628590972631240706

Quote from: Hysmic
Hate collingwood but richmond always crying about stadiums
Quote from: David Morfey
Cry me a river try being a non Victorian club that has to travel every second, drama queens
https://twitter.com/superfooty/status/1628661417766445058
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on February 26, 2023, 08:00:47 AM
(https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/attachments/1677293900280-png.1615427/)
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/practice-match-v-collingwood-friday-24th-feb-11-00am-princes-park.1344571/page-44
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 01, 2023, 07:32:20 AM
Quote from: Sttew
Even Martin's 2020 when he won the NS was unspectacular - hardly GOAT material - 15th in the AFLCA, not in the top 5 of the MVP, equal 4th in the Brownlow with Dangerfield, but 16 votes behind the winner, didn't even win Richmond's B&F. And yet because he was BOG in the GF somehow we're expected to accept that made him No.1 in the competition in 2020?? Isaac Smith probably isn't top 50 in the competition but he won the NS
Quote from: Corn Cobbers
He's played well in 3 finals series and badly in 5, that's less than 50%, nothing elite about that.
Quote from: Fadge
Yeah, but there were 'reasons' for Martin's bad performances....

Too young, too old, lack of fitness, personal issues.

We need to completely disregard any sub-par performances and only consider a small subset of a small subset of games (only finals and only when he is fully fit and in the prime age range, and also discount any Qualifying Finals they lost because they're nothing more than glorified home and away games) when assessing him.
Quote from: Corn Cobber
And he did nothing in the 2018 prelim when you blew your once in a millennium chance to get four flags in a row which only the greatest clubs have done

Dusty is a downhill-skier in finals
Quote from: Trav 20
Let's use Ablett Snr as an example. Look at his highlights compared to Martin. Ablett could jump on shoulders, kick longer, he was faster, he hit harder, he could kick more freakish goals, he was just generally more uncanny. People would go to games just to see what he'd do that day. Martin doesn't have that ability. No opposition supporter turns up to a Richmond game because of some freakish show Martin might put on. There's literally nothing Martin could do that Ablett Snr wouldn't do better.

BUT because of 3 games Martin is the best player of all time ? And he wasn't particularly dominant in most of them !!! He just played well.

The blokes nowhere near any conversation for best ever.
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/if-dustin-martin-wins-a-4th-norm-smith-medal-and-premiership-will-he-be-regarded-as-the-greatest-player-of-all-time.1341391/page-220#post-78099842
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 01, 2023, 04:58:49 PM
Quote from: Realistically Confident Collingwood Supporters
A reminder to Richmond supporters where they were in 2011 with a home fixture against Carlton at the Punt Road end of the MCG. Empty seats + getting smashed every game.

Never forget who you once were while we propped you up.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FqGpoYgacAAi-bM?format=jpg&name=4096x4096)
Quote from: Realistically Confident Collingwood Supporters
2012 Vs Hawthorn
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FqGq18aaUAAW9zO?format=jpg&name=large)
Quote from: Realistically Confident Collingwood Supporters
No surprise you fill level 1 punt road end for a Collingwood home game.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FqGrhWXaEAAuEeP?format=jpg&name=large)

Reply from a Tiger supporter.

Quote from: Grinners
Collingwood home game in 2015

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FqGzQf4aIAInnsT?format=jpg&name=large)(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FqGzQf2aMAA2EoD?format=jpg&name=large)
https://twitter.com/RCCSSocial/status/1630771056591122435

 ;D
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Damo on March 01, 2023, 07:15:50 PM
Lmao

Checkmate
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 02, 2023, 04:17:53 AM
Here come the excuses as he keeps getting owned  :lol.

Quote from: Ashan
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FqHbPiTaMAAvZ-q?format=jpg&name=large)
Quote from: Realistically Confident Collingwood Supporters
Let me guess - this was the Freo game on a Friday night when it was 6 degrees and peeing down all day in 2016. Not even i went that night.
https://twitter.com/RCCSSocial/status/1630849010654408705
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 05, 2023, 06:50:41 PM
These are just a fraction of number of the replies from opposition fans about Cotch.

Quote from: Albert Thurgood
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FqXjoc9agAA65N6?format=jpg&name=large)
Quote from: Matthew Marshall
Has always been a cheap shot grub!
Quote from: Corey Burl
‘Clumsiest’ bloke in the league. King of the cheap shot
Quote from: Samuel Cue
New year. Same old grub.
Quote from: Danny Rugs ☘🧀🔴⚪⚫
Mr untouchable. Will probably get gifted another brownlow for this
Quote from: Mitchell Kermath
The umpire will be suspended for paying a free kick against Trent no doubt
Quote from: Scott Patten
Of course not he plays for the Tigers.
Quote from: John.S
Cotchin reporter are you kidding He and the Richmond Football Club are a protected species.   Just like the Tigers are in the jungles 😎
https://twitter.com/FOXFOOTY/status/1631915441777160192
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 06, 2023, 06:51:56 PM
Quote from: It's not my fault, honest! @CatmanForever
He always escapes a ban.  If it was Tom Hawkins or  Tom Stewart, they would have got 2 weeks.
Quote from: Mark 🇦🇺 GFC🏆
Of course he did. In the top 10 dirtiest players and a heavily protected
Quote from: jeremy
Great statement MRO, now the standard for the year. Teflon Cotchin strikes again
Quote from: Nic
The AFL is so corrupt, if that was Toby Greene would have got 3 weeks min. Cotchin gets it nothing to see here, what a joke.
Quote from: David Arthur Scott
Protected Species
Always has been
Always will be apparently
Quote from: Scotty Bremner
Dirty little sniper gets away with it every time
Quote from: Rational Carlton Fan
That’s it. That seals the deal. In all my years of watching AFL i have never seen anything like this disgrace. Goodbye AFL, I will not be watching again until you have fixed your system.
https://twitter.com/FootyonNine/status/1632627266483265537
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: JP Tiger on March 06, 2023, 07:39:11 PM
I loved 'Rational Carlton Fan' being utterly irrational!  I'll bet he gets over it on or around about time for Round 1 ...   *flog ...      :lol
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 09, 2023, 05:32:20 AM
Quote from: Scorched Earth
Taranto for market value? 5.25 mil over 7 years. 😂 timmy along with hopper literally being pushed out because giants need to clear the books.
I can’t recall a single game timmy has torn up and won. Good above average footballer. Not worth the coin. Rankine done more already.

Quote from: Scorched Earth
Trenty. I truly want nothing more in this world to see him out cold in game 299. Im talking eyes rolling back of head kind of out cold. Buddy almost got him last year, but somebody needs to finish the job this year. The biggest sniper in the game.
https://twitter.com/MrLesGrossman_/with_replies

Stay classy Blues fans  ::).
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Broadsword on March 09, 2023, 08:08:03 AM
Man, imagine wishing for someone to get KO'd for your own satisfaction. With what we know about CTE now that's pretty disgusting.

Sounds like a faux tough guy to me.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: MintOnLamb on March 09, 2023, 08:14:40 AM


Quote from: Scorched Earth
Trenty. I truly want nothing more in this world to see him out cold in game 299. Im talking eyes rolling back of head kind of out cold. Buddy almost got him last year, but somebody needs to finish the job this year. The biggest sniper in the game.
https://twitter.com/MrLesGrossman_/with_replies

Stay classy Blues fans  ::).
[/quote]
Seriously what is wrong with people?
Are we trying to be better in this world?
That person should be totally ashamed
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 10, 2023, 08:27:11 PM
Quote from: Dylan
Not really it will be similar for him, Richmond have like 10,000 fans Carlton will have like 80,000 fans. We all know Richmond supporters are just bandwagons

Quote from: jaru
Shouldn’t be [a Tiger home game]
https://twitter.com/delzkiii/status/1634109257930137602
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 11, 2023, 07:42:09 AM
Quote from: Andrew Ivezic
Yeah, smashing up on powerhouses GWS and Adelaide at home, then winning the 15min quarter covid season. Remarkable feats 🙄
Quote from: Anne Wyllie
Give me a break he got Lynch after winning a GF with no trade bans unlike swans with Buddy and now he’s taking GWS players. Of course though the Vic clubs can have everything along with hardly any travelling.
Quote from: Ash
You literally got Tom Lynch for less than he’s worth
Quote from: Ash
Alex Rance was a priority pick
Quote from: Chris
Hawthorn lost buddy to our nearest rival at the time. Then beat them. And we got hurt by the drafts too.
https://twitter.com/SENBreakfast/status/1633938239907332097
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Gracie on March 11, 2023, 10:22:19 PM
It is not something l am overly hung up on. Just would like to win the premiership this year and see what the numpties can come up with as to why we are undeserved 4 time premiership team

It is fun reading the melts
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 12, 2023, 05:15:54 AM
Quote from: Mr Meow
On paper this shapes as reasonable but can we really say 2011 Collingwood was on the same level as 2020 Geelong? Nobody gave Geelong a chance last year. I'd argue the 7 changes in the 2022 side were all crucial in shaping it into a legitimate finals force rather than a team that couldn't hack the real stuff. So yes technically Richmond beat a side that would later become premiers but the consensus is that 2017 Adelaide, 2019 GWS and 2020 Geelong weren't great sides. None of them could cope with Richmond. Whereas in the Geelong triumvirate of premierships Hawthorn and Collingwood stood up, the Bulldogs pushed some much more talented sides to the wire and St Kilda certainly could've nabbed one or two if the ball bounced differently. In a world without Richmond we probably see GWS nab a flag from 7th, Adelaide finally win another premiership (with a worse side than their mid 2000s teams that didn't even make GFs) and universally mocked pretenders Geelong, Port or Brisbane get one. To go with the Doggies fairytale flag from 8th. It's a compliment to say that Richmond were the only strong side in that era who could stand up in finals. 2008-2013 you had multiple teams putting on incredible H&A seasons (18-4 or better) with some underdogs pushing them all the way in finals and even nabbing the odd flag. I just see that as a stronger top 4 collectively.
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/if-dustin-martin-wins-a-4th-norm-smith-medal-and-premiership-will-he-be-regarded-as-the-greatest-player-of-all-time.1341391/page-253#post-78213705
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Broadsword on March 12, 2023, 03:16:03 PM
It is undeniable that had we not won the premierships other teams would have won them. That is so insightful I need to go and sit down while I let that sink in. A pleasure to hear from the sooky babies as usual.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 21, 2023, 03:25:54 PM
When you're such an obsessed opposition fan that you talk about Richmond even when incidents have nothing to do with Richmond or our players :wallywink.

Quote from: Mez Walker
Nothing says Richmond is a protected club more than Pickett not being sent straight to the tribunal. #afl
https://twitter.com/mezmclean/status/1637735795229614080

Quote from: Brett
Going on from your explantion.

Franklin - Superstar

Pickett - Rising star

McAdam - not either

Lucky Cotchin wasn’t one of the offenders he would’ve been given a bonus.
https://twitter.com/BrettCappa/status/1637946815705407488
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 22, 2023, 06:43:02 AM
Quote from: CrowToon
The reality is that the 17 grand final doesn't even make the top 10 list of traumas experienced by a Crows fan since then. It just doesn't register as pain such is our acquired threshold.

Nek minnit ...

Quote from: Go the Guts
Which the top team had to play away from their home, even though they won both of their finals. #VFL
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/afl-2023-round-2-crows-v-tigers-sat-march-25th-4-35pm-aedt-ao.1349358/post-78353926

Quote from: 7AFL
Shane McAdam has been found guilty of rough conduct on Jacob Wehr by the tribunal ❌
Quote from: Matty C
Hey @AFL, what potential for injury was there in this one? (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f914.png)

Shiel and Cotchin collide - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NkFSpClBLqQ

Dylan Shiel could not finish the game after showing signs of delayed concussion.
Quote from: Matty C
Please tell us all how many games Cotchin was given for that one... (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f914.png) (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f595.png)  (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f595.png)
https://twitter.com/cookster17/status/1638094327418351616
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 24, 2023, 08:45:15 PM
Port fans still whinging about a deliberate out of bounds call three years later :wallywink.

Quote from: #since1969 🎹🍐🌻🇺🇦
Remember Hammer getting outed in the Prelim vs Richmond? Cost us a goal & the game… will never forget
https://twitter.com/_Since1969/status/1638873561111855105

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tiger Khosh on March 24, 2023, 08:48:55 PM
Port fans still whinging about a deliberate out of bounds call three years later :wallywink.

Quote from: #since1969 🎹🍐🌻🇺🇦
Remember Hammer getting outed in the Prelim vs Richmond? Cost us a goal & the game… will never forget
https://twitter.com/_Since1969/status/1638873561111855105

As deliberate as it gets. Literally had a team mate either side and put it out right btw the 2.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 25, 2023, 02:14:09 PM
AFL Twitter fanbases ranked. This is definitive.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fr_BmepaMAIcBzs?format=jpg&name=medium)
https://twitter.com/penguinickx/status/1639241659060989955
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 27, 2023, 07:15:43 PM
Quote from: stuartjmcnamara
He’s correct. Richmond’s membership base includes a lot of pets and people that live overseas (probably bots anyway).

Quote from: Kev's Magpies
Let’s be honest you guys wouldn’t have won those flags if you kept Hardwick and if he got sacked you wouldn’t be getting those premierships
https://twitter.com/1116sen/status/1640111886560817153

 :stupid
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: TigerLand on March 27, 2023, 08:53:57 PM
AFL Twitter fanbases ranked. This is definitive.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fr_BmepaMAIcBzs?format=jpg&name=medium)
https://twitter.com/penguinickx/status/1639241659060989955

This really makes me laugh.

Basically let's fire up the 4 biggest fan bases so this post gets the most traction possible lol
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 27, 2023, 10:22:41 PM
Quote from: qldmagpie67
Richmond don’t scare me really
There a slower side and there lazy
There win and draw have flattered them they could ache easily be 0-2
There dependant so dependant on 6 players it can unravel very quick
Lynch can’t kick goals when the ball doesn’t go inside there 50m so there’s the challenge
Win it at the coal face send it deep and pressure them to death
https://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/viewtopic.php?t=91670&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=30

Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Fluffy Tiger on March 27, 2023, 10:34:14 PM
Quote from: qldmagpie67

Win it at the coal face send it deep and pressure them to death
https://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/viewtopic.php?t=91670&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=30

Same game plan to beat any team. Shows how stupid this post is.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on March 28, 2023, 02:38:40 AM
Quote from: qldmagpie67
Richmond don’t scare me really
There a slower side and there lazy
There win and draw have flattered them they could ache easily be 0-2
There dependant so dependant on 6 players it can unravel very quick
Lynch can’t kick goals when the ball doesn’t go inside there 50m so there’s the challenge
Win it at the coal face send it deep and pressure them to death
https://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/viewtopic.php?t=91670&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=30



THEY'RE***

Fmd
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Tiger Khosh on March 28, 2023, 05:32:31 AM
“Lynch can’t kick goals when the ball doesn’t go inside their fwd 50”

Geez what a revolutionary take that is. If only every team knew that to stop the opposition forward from kicking goals, you’ve just got to keep the ball more then 50 metres away from the goal…..
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 28, 2023, 05:34:29 AM
Quote from: Aetos 68
No brainer. He’s 100% spot on. When Richmond miss out on the 8 this year they will go back to having an empty MCG.
Quote from: peter crisp
If there is one side I hate it's Richmond and looking forward to the game Friday
https://twitter.com/1116sen/status/1640111886560817153
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 31, 2023, 12:23:32 AM
Quote from: GRIMLOCK
If it was an Adelaide player doing this to a Richmond player it would be 5/6wks, just like last year Cotchin went studs up and kicked Walker over the boundary. Grub club.
https://twitter.com/AFL/status/1640614950023622656


(https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/attachments/1679989926935-png.1642716/)
https://www.facebook.com/AFL/posts/pfbid02tQn8UCXcH5raGkLuoAXj9p2kQwT1CgkSAdudFQzJS6rJwmX6nzGiLGpcGE1B9DSjl
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on April 07, 2023, 12:48:03 AM
Quote from: catscollector
2020 will forever be tainted.
Half the competition couldn't give a sh*t just like most other sporting codes around the world. And I'd say the same thing if Geelong pinched that flag.
17 week season, 16 minute quarters lol, no wonder it'll be the last time in decades your mob win anything.
Quote from: catscollector
Your last flag was won in a bubble. A time when the world couldn't really give a toss about sport. Most teams weren't trying. Games were delayed, shortened, and the finals began in round 19!
lol, that is right around the time when potential finalists are settling their best 22 for the month leading into finals.
2020*
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/geelong-v-richmond-go.1350913/
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: MintOnLamb on April 07, 2023, 06:29:26 AM
IIRC, the mafia/media was saying at the time something along the lines..

“Whichever team wins the flag this year(2020) in such disruptive conditions it will be the greatest win since the competition started”

I may be wrong but is should have added. “…except Richmond”
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on April 13, 2023, 06:42:55 AM
Quote from: christopher lee
Tom lynch not suspended isn't a shock the bloke is the most protected player in the league
Quote from: cuzzy
Tigers big VFL club of course they win absolutely no surprise
Quote from: Sharon H
Rubbing the Trent Cochin genie.
Quote from: Leigh Wintershoven
3 certainties in life: death, taxes, and Tom Lynch being cleared at the tribunal.
Quote from: daarrrroonnnn
The grubbiest grub to ever grub
Quote from: major tom
No one should be surprised with this decision it is lynch after all
Quote from: Harry
One of the worst, cowardly, snipers, we’ve seen in footy. Cheap shots, dog acts, and intent to hurt players in vulnerable situations.
Can play footy, no doubt. But Lynch is cowardly sniper of the worst kind.
Quote from: Ian HOLLAND
Of course he’s free to play l said he’s a Richmond player and a Victorian one of the protected. a player from any interstate team would have been rubbed out. Who cares if Alex got knocked out we are supposed to be protecting the players. I am so over the MRO, mob of crooks.
Quote from: Rational Carlton Fan
That’s it! I’m officially unfollowing the AFL now! This is beyond a farce. This thug should have been banished for 4+ weeks!! And he’s just gotten 0! The AFL need to have a hard long look at themselves and how they operate because they are losing loyal fans. Goodbye, AFL!
https://twitter.com/FOXFOOTY/status/1645745971744378882
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Damo on April 13, 2023, 11:19:19 AM
Lmao
Rational Carlton Fan again

That idiot is the gift that keeps giving
He made a habit of popping up in this thread throwing his toys out the cot
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on April 14, 2023, 01:11:45 AM
Quote from: nath :)
Every year it’s “should Richmond steal [insert star player from non vic club here]”. Can they develop their own talent for once? Most of their star players came from trades!
Quote from: Josh
Why don’t the tigers just take all of the Giants list why there’re at it
https://twitter.com/AFL/status/1646045926912589824
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: Andyy on April 14, 2023, 11:17:25 AM
Better headline.

How about some other teams manage their lists better instead of offering stupid money on back-ended deals that are guaranteed to cause cap pressure and result in a fire sale?

Looking at you GWS, Pies etc
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: wayne on April 17, 2023, 10:54:58 AM
Quote from: nath :)
Every year it’s “should Richmond steal [insert star player from non vic club here]”. Can they develop their own talent for once? Most of their star players came from trades!


 :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on April 18, 2023, 10:10:33 PM
Quote from: AFL
Anthony Caminiti has received a three-match ban for striking.
Quote from: Matt
Yep. Cotchin laid a similar hit in a prelim. Played the next week
Quote from: Sarah 🦢
What about Shai Bolton?! Nothing!
https://twitter.com/AFL/status/1648259278028021760


Pies supporter.
Quote from: Lachie 🇦🇺
Back to irrelevance for another 37 years
https://twitter.com/lachy_33/status/1647900304300740608
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 02, 2023, 03:34:15 PM
Quote from: Gazza
Tassie Tigers send Richmond there, They have a Tassie tradition and they only get 25k to Melbourne games these days.
https://twitter.com/gazgeelong

Quote from: Andrew Wu
Winners of seven of the last 10 premierships. Equalisation at work. #AFLTigersSuns
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fu8m-izacAUZlee?format=jpg&name=small)
Quote from: outbreezyWC
this stat is only true because the hawks and tigers were able to stockpile 6 flags due to fixturing/GF location advantages
https://twitter.com/wutube/status/1652582449669603330
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 05, 2023, 04:17:12 PM
Dogs fan's slightly obsessed.

Quote from: Dylan Thomson
Lmao, watch pure footy. It backs up this. 7 years no hurt no damage, best. Enjoy, it’s OVER 😂 😂
Quote from: Dylan Thomson
Man. It’s over, apologies. Enjoy bottom 6 next 5 years, it’ll be f****** awesome to watch. LESGOOOO
Quote from: Dylan Thomson
(https://media.tenor.com/UltRXyVaayQAAAAM/judge-judy-its-over.gif)
https://twitter.com/dthomson42/status/1654326402446143489
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on May 13, 2023, 07:09:13 AM
Quote from: Jhye Clark 13
Richmond are an average side. Auskick footy.

Full side we win by a lot.
Quote from: Finknottle
True, Richmond rely on snaps at goal, scrubbing the ball along the ground and punching it forward. It worked against us because our team balance was shot. Parfitt and Bews were terrible, but there were several not much better. The extra handball to a player under the pump happened with regularity. Sometimes it's better to just kick the ball forward. Two Geelong players competing against each other while one Richmond player waits for the ball to be fumbled out. 3 Geelong backs going for the mark against 1 Richmond forward. 5 Geelong players swarming in the honeypot while 3 Richmond players wait for it to be squeezed out. The video will make for interesting viewing during the week.
Quote from: caitsith01
I'm sick of getting outcoached by that idiot Hardwick. When every long kick goes to an unmarked Tiger then something is way, way off.

That reminded me of the 2020 GF and was most unpleasant.
Quote from: UnitedWarrior93
We won pretty much all the stats, despite playing poorly and kicking for goal poorly. 8 premiership players out, while Richmond played their best game of the year and kicking out of their ass at goal.

Let the media run win the tigers are back lol.
Quote from: cats_09
Being at the game it seemed that majority of the Richmond crowd must have come in after they opened the gates at 3/4 time

The crowd was silent when Richmond ran out at the start of the match, and even during the first half they made noise but nothing crazy

According the board, the attendance was a tad over 58k, and they seemed to finally find their voice in the last - but damn that's got to be disappointing for Richmond with that turnout

They want these Friday night matches and to be taken seriously as a "Big Club", but when you factor in the Geelong crew that would have turned up, less than half of Richmond's reported 100k+ members turned up for a home match at their home ground

One reason I love Geelong & our home games - our fans turn out to support our club, and there's barely a seat to be found regardless of our opponent & when where playing down at KP
Quote from: Jemaine
The crowd of 58k tonight was pathetic, there is no amount of tiger fan crying that should be able to stop them playing at KP next year.

When they do have a whinge, point to this game and ask where the other 50k members were.
Quote from: fpm84
It is an indictment on Richmond that we were alive so late and that their million dollar midfield got thumped in clearances by a VFL side. The Taranto and Hopper deals will haunt them for a long time.
Quote from: kickazz
Geez Richmond's game style means they give away more frees than they get, regularly.

Tonight it was 2:1 in their favour. Every dodgy one seemed to go their way apart from Jezza's dropped mark.

Think we were a bit unlucky there. Umps rarely matter as much as people think. I recon you get one game a year where you can feel a bit aggrieved, hopefully this was it.
Quote from: SleazySimon
Not allowed to touch dusty but hes allowed to push, got it
Quote from: Schmegg
Giving Richmond fans a bone in a year they won’t amount to much will ensure they will be posting rubbish at the pointy end about how they “beat Geelong at their best”.
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/argh-bugger-tigers-by-24.1356691/

Quote from: Jimmy 'Melb City 3-Peat' Fazz
Umpires seem to have forgotten we are in 2023 and not 2019 and that Richmond aren't a contender
Quote from: Jimmy Wheelbarrow
Just like the good old days. Umps cheating like crazy for the (https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/svg/1f405.svg)
Quote from: Tom McInnes
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fv7WiLNaMAAeie-?format=jpg&name=small)
https://twitter.com/AFL/status/1656992264886063104
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on August 11, 2023, 12:19:17 PM
Bitter Bomber fans  :wallywink.

Quote from: Tony Walton
While you're cleaning out your locker, ask Jobe to come in and collect his Charlie. It's not really yours.
Quote from: Nathan Storer
Should still be in jail for theft.
Quote from: tank for harley @averagedons
dog act winner 2012
Quote from: Ray
Great career Cotch , one of the best your a super star, but u didn't win 2012 brownlow

https://twitter.com/AFL/status/1689426185338695681
https://twitter.com/triplemfooty/status/1689577330195513346
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on November 15, 2023, 11:37:59 PM
Quote from: "Tom Lhinton
Two years ago they were chasing sheep around on pre season camp.

Last year they were building sandcastles in Lorne.

This year they’re passing out in heat chambers.

Lol, the gift that keeps on giving the Tiges. 😂
Quote from: Mat
You know a team is desperate when they try this sort of poo
https://twitter.com/xandermcg9/status/1724705664709341397
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 03, 2024, 06:16:36 PM
Scott Gullan in the HeraldSun.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GHsmuQlbMAAj2qw?format=jpg&name=small)

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/teams/collingwood/never-been-harder-why-odds-are-against-collingwoods-backtoback-premiership-dream/news-story/8f8404e1c7cfd8c04432b7d0e62b41cf
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: one-eyed on March 04, 2024, 10:41:13 PM
Tim Gossage

Wooden spoon: Richmond

https://www.sen.com.au/news/2024/03/04/sens-experts-from-around-the-country-make-their-2024-afl-season-predictions/

Everyone at SEN tipped the Weagles for the spoon except Goosage.
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: tony_montana on March 04, 2024, 11:39:02 PM
Scott Gullan in the HeraldSun.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GHsmuQlbMAAj2qw?format=jpg&name=small)

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/teams/collingwood/never-been-harder-why-odds-are-against-collingwoods-backtoback-premiership-dream/news-story/8f8404e1c7cfd8c04432b7d0e62b41cf

what a flog, if anything 2020 is the toughest of them all, neutral away ground and fairest fixture you'll ever see in the afl with everyone playing each other once
Title: Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
Post by: georgies31 on March 05, 2024, 03:33:25 PM
Scott Gullan in the HeraldSun.

Not only that closed that myth we won the other 2 because we play so many at the MCG media here nothing but clowns.






(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GHsmuQlbMAAj2qw?format=jpg&name=small)

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/teams/collingwood/never-been-harder-why-odds-are-against-collingwoods-backtoback-premiership-dream/news-story/8f8404e1c7cfd8c04432b7d0e62b41cf

what a flog, if anything 2020 is the toughest of them all, neutral away ground and fairest fixture you'll ever see in the afl with everyone playing each other once