One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => On the Prowl => Topic started by: WilliamPowell on June 17, 2007, 10:24:24 PM

Title: Who really did say this
Post by: WilliamPowell on June 17, 2007, 10:24:24 PM
You know going through the forum archives can be quite entertaining ;D :thumbsup

Some of these are between 3-6 months old others are nearly 3 years old and after the Wallace thread making a comeback in the last couple of days just couldn't resist.

Which OER posters said these (no finger pointing just a bit of fun folks)

1. But if I were gambler - I'd say Wallace at the moment would be our next coach

2. I am sick of hearing about bloody Sheedy, i hope he resigns so that we can get on with what we want to do and get our own Coach.

If he really wanted to come, he wouldnt have even discussed his coaching contract with the bombers until after the season had finished.

3. I am happy that we no longer will have to anticipate his return as our coach. I am sick of the crap that we go through everytime he is out of contract.

Bring on Wallace

4. This is 1999 all over again. The bombers offer Sheeds a 2 year deal. Sheeds says he wants 3 and plays hard to get with the Dons showing off the I could leave you and coach Richmond card. Essendon after saying definitely no more than 2 years will all of a sudden in the next few days cave in to 3.

Sheedy was a Richmond player but he is a Essendon man. Was as a kid and still is now.


4. Terry Wallace has already been earmarked for the job. Problem is that he WONT come to Tigerland if the board  spills or there are problems , who would.?......

Lets get a good coach now, straighten the ship up and move forward.

5. I wouldn't mind having Wallace as coach and Eade as an assistant. At least we wouldn't be getting recommended the Fletchers of the world.

6. We certainly shafted Adelaide last year with a pretty pooh game plan!
Don't think Terry's quite as stupid as you're making him out to be.

7. big article from caroline as you expect when she is talking about richmond ...

8. Its not looking good Jacko...not good at all.


9. he is not as ox , he is a sheep (in reference to D Schwarz not our own Ox ;D)

10. Depends how much I've had to drink and if we are on the end of a thrashing and if the umps are being w@nkers... so yeah me lol.

11. Meanwhile, in 2007 I see Foley, Tambling, Schulz and Deledio as the big movers. In a less dramatic way, I'm hoping to see JON, Thursfield,Polo, Patto, Casserley and Moore really develop, and for Polak to finally establish himself.



 :thumbsup ;D :thumbsup

 :gotigers :gotigers
Title: Re: Who really did say this
Post by: Fishfinger on June 17, 2007, 10:57:28 PM
10. Moi?
The "lol" looks like a dead giveaway.  :) (Not to mention the tippling and ump abuse  8))
Title: Re: Who really did say this
Post by: Moi on June 17, 2007, 11:28:56 PM
10. Moi?
The "lol" looks like a dead giveaway.  :) (Not to mention the tippling and ump abuse  8))
Not to mention the eloquence of speech!
 :rollin
Title: Re: Who really did say this
Post by: Stephanie on June 18, 2007, 06:19:39 AM
9 is X?
Title: Re: Who really did say this
Post by: WilliamPowell on June 18, 2007, 07:19:00 AM
9 is X?

Correct Steph - it was xXx

10. Moi?
The "lol" looks like a dead giveaway.  :) (Not to mention the tippling and ump abuse  8))

 ;D
Unfortunately no FF - it's not Moi lol  :thumbsup perhaps an apprentice ;)
Title: Re: Who really did say this
Post by: Fishfinger on June 18, 2007, 09:47:53 AM
Hmmm, an apprentice (of eloquent speech  :)).
Steph?
Title: Re: Who really did say this
Post by: Bulluss on June 18, 2007, 11:41:42 AM
No. 10 2JD?
Title: Re: Who really did say this
Post by: mightytiges on June 18, 2007, 12:26:28 PM
I think I'm the first 4. and Jack's the second 4. Hey WP are you trying to confuse us with numbers lately  :rollin.

5. Bull?
Title: Re: Who really did say this
Post by: WilliamPowell on June 18, 2007, 08:19:38 PM
Hmmm, an apprentice (of eloquent speech  :)).
Steph?


 :clapping :clapping

Well done Fish No. 10 is Steph
Title: Re: Who really did say this
Post by: WilliamPowell on June 18, 2007, 08:21:47 PM
I think I'm the first 4. and Jack's the second 4.

Correct MT No. 4 the first is you and No. 4 the 2nd is Jack

Quote

 Hey WP are you trying to confuse us with numbers lately  :rollin.


Don't know about you but I am certainly confusing myself :help :-\ :whistle :P :wallywink

Quote

5. Bull?

Nope
Title: Re: Who really did say this
Post by: mightytiges on June 19, 2007, 10:07:35 PM
 :help  :-\

1. WP
2. X
3. Bull
5. CUB
6. X
7. Jack
8. WP
11. DallasCrane

Title: Re: Who really did say this
Post by: WilliamPowell on June 19, 2007, 10:16:23 PM
:help  :-\


 ;D

Quote

1. WP

 :clapping correct

Quote
2. X

Nope

Quote
3. Bull

 :clapping :clapping :clapping :birthday yep
 ;D

Quote
5. CUB

Nah
Quote
6. X

Nope
Quote
7. Jack
Nope

Quote
8. WP


No not me ;D

Quote
11. DallasCrane

Not Dallas
Title: Re: Who really did say this
Post by: WilliamPowell on June 20, 2007, 10:03:04 PM
bump "d' bump

Want some clues  ;D
Title: Re: Who really did say this
Post by: julzqld on June 21, 2007, 10:45:54 AM
2. blaisee
6. Oxx
9. JohnF
11 Bluey
Title: Re: Who really did say this
Post by: WilliamPowell on June 22, 2007, 09:44:28 AM
2. blaisee
6. Oxx
9. JohnF
11 Bluey

All wrong Julz.

BTW - Steph got number 9 earlier - No. 9 is X

Here's a clue

Numbers 2 & 3 were said by the same person ;)



Title: Re: Who really did say this
Post by: cub on June 22, 2007, 10:01:14 AM
2 & 3 seem a bit moisy
8 bull
Title: Re: Who really did say this
Post by: WilliamPowell on June 22, 2007, 11:21:17 AM
2 & 3 seem a bit moisy
8 bull

Close but no cigar ;D
Title: Re: Who really did say this
Post by: Bulluss on June 22, 2007, 12:21:03 PM
2 & 3 seem a bit moisy
8 bull

Close by no cigar ;D

LMAO @ CUB