One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: one-eyed on October 09, 2007, 03:37:38 AM

Title: Jordan McMahon
Post by: one-eyed on October 09, 2007, 03:37:38 AM
From today's Age

Out-of-contract Bulldog Jordan McMahon could be reunited with former coach Terry Wallace, with Richmond expressing keen interest in him, while Port Adelaide also is believed to be eager to encourage the former South Australian home.

The Dogs are likely to seek a second-round draft pick for McMahon, while the Tigers would leverage their first pick in the pre-season draft in any negotiation.

Link. (http://www.realfooty.com.au/news/news/kangaroos-hunt-for-lions-midfielder-selwood/2007/10/08/1191695823242.html)

--------------

Port Adelaide could snare McMahon
09 October 2007   Herald Sun
Mark Stevens

PORT Adelaide has emerged as a potential new home for Western Bulldogs defender Jordan McMahon.

It is understood the Power yesterday signalled their interest in McMahon, who is out of contract and weighing up his future while overseas.

McMahon, originally from South Australia, had a disappointing season after a shining start.

The Dogs would be happy to retain McMahon, but there is also speculation he could end up at a rival Victorian club.

Link. (http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/footy/common/story_page/0,8033,22553887%255E20322,00.html)
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: {X} on October 09, 2007, 06:09:41 AM
my grandma has come back from th edead and is considering playing afl, and guess what the tigers and miller are interested and will speak to her manager


bloody hell, we are after every single player apparantly lol
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: julzqld on October 09, 2007, 07:44:49 AM
Us and Collingwood
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: wayne on October 09, 2007, 08:35:54 AM
*sigh*

I know it's all speculation at this stage but please not him either.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: DallasCrane on October 09, 2007, 11:29:12 AM
P Bowden is a better footballer that McMahon....he is a better kick under pressure, and he still can't get a game at Richmond, so why oh why would you be interested in McMahon?
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: cub on October 09, 2007, 12:54:46 PM
ATM this is all the offseason krap flying about, interesting to read but water off a ducks back so to say.
Will wait and see what happens, but if what is floating around pans out Wallace and Miller will be well on their way to having their coffins finished come mid 2008.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: mightytiges on October 09, 2007, 06:10:28 PM
If you have the body of a greyhound you'll get picked up by us  :-\.

We better hope this is all a bluff to shake the player tree to get other players we actually want to fall out uncontracted otherwise this trade/draft period will be a total disaster. Of course those who make these ridiculous decisions move on to something else while the Club is left to deal with the consequences  :help.

 
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: cub on October 09, 2007, 06:15:01 PM
If you have the body of a greyhound you'll get picked up by us  :-\.

 

Was saying to a bullies supporter the other day wallace is seeminglee leading us in their direction.
Not a total disaster by any means but needs to be balanced out with some big bodies otherwise  :banghead see what happened to them this year :P
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Bull on October 09, 2007, 06:18:26 PM
We will soon be called the Richmond Muppets soon.

They all have long dangly arms that have no muscle or size.

Id rather see Conners play the role McMahon would if he came over.

Not needed.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: rogerd3 on October 09, 2007, 09:01:01 PM
i think he will be in SA next year.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Passionfruit on October 09, 2007, 09:30:30 PM
We will soon be called the Richmond Muppets soon.

They all have long dangly arms that have no muscle or size.

Id rather see Conners play the role McMahon would if he came over.

Not needed.


Muppets, now where is Aaron Fiora :lol
Jordon McMahon, ::) ::) ::). Could be back to back spoons at this rate, Blake now McMahon ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: bluey_21 on October 09, 2007, 10:04:20 PM
WTF, McMahon is a good footballer who had a poo season like many other doggy players
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: mightytiges on October 09, 2007, 11:39:23 PM
WTF, McMahon is a good footballer who had a poo season like many other doggy players
I agree he's not a bad footballer bluey but he's not the type of player we badly need when we're short of onballers, KPPs and ruckmen. 
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: torch on October 10, 2007, 12:28:23 AM
no
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: one-eyed on October 10, 2007, 01:36:06 AM
Us, Port and Melbourne are interested in McMahon. Port may miss out as McMahon is apparently not so interested in returning to Adelaide.

Link. (http://realfooty.com.au/news/news/dee-back-in-melbourne-but-not-for-long/2007/10/09/1191695909397.html)
Title: 3-way deal: McMahon to Tigers, Schulz to Port, Damon White to Dogs
Post by: one-eyed on October 10, 2007, 03:36:37 AM
Richmond, the Power and the Western Bulldogs could be involved in a three-club trade that results in Jordan McMahon going from the Dogs to the Tigers, Damon White leaving Port Adelaide for the Bulldogs and Schulz crossing to Port.

Miller said Richmond would look at trading Schulz for reasonable compensation.

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22559810-5012432,00.html
Title: Re: 3-way deal: Jordan McMahon to Tigers, Schulz to Port, Damon White to Dogs
Post by: Ramps on October 10, 2007, 06:56:25 AM
Id rather that the club look at what Port have to offer for schulz before we do a 3 way trade ... i dont rate mcmahon- not what we need.
Title: Re: 3-way deal: Jordan McMahon to Tigers, Schulz to Port, Damon White to Dogs
Post by: mightytiges on October 10, 2007, 12:25:40 PM
Id rather that the club look at what Port have to offer for schulz before we do a 3 way trade ... i dont rate mcmahon- not what we need.
Agree Ramps and we are also giving away a KPP for a small.

Not sure what Port would offer that they'd be happy to let go. Victorian Robert Gray had some good cameos in his debut year. I didn't mind the look of their rookie Gavin Grose in the U18s who is a young key defender (192cm, 89kg). We could also ask for a pick but would only get pick 33 at best off Port.

Damon White has done as much as Schulz has and is 2 years older. Not sure why the Dogs wouldn't just do a straight trade with us for McMahon unless picks are involved as well in this 3-way trade.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Tigermonk on October 10, 2007, 06:06:51 PM
If you have the body of a greyhound you'll get picked up by us  :-\.

We better hope this is all a bluff to shake the player tree to get other players we actually want to fall out uncontracted otherwise this trade/draft period will be a total disaster. Of course those who make these ridiculous decisions move on to something else while the Club is left to deal with the consequences  :help.

 

exactly what l been ranting about recently Richmond draft skinny under developed footballers who take years to progress & lose interest cause there not getting anywhere
skinny kids in floppy jumpers  ;D 
Title: Re: 3-way deal: Jordan McMahon to Tigers, Schulz to Port, Damon White to Dogs
Post by: one-eyed on October 10, 2007, 06:35:34 PM
Ch 9 saying McMahon may swap with Port's Damon White. McMahon having a medical with Port. So we may not get McMahon anyway.

The Doggies say McMahon is still a wanted player but know Port and Richmond are interested.
Title: Re: 3-way deal: Jordan McMahon to Tigers, Schulz to Port, Damon White to Dogs
Post by: Ramps on October 10, 2007, 06:37:52 PM
Pick 16 to Richmond Schulz to Port is my info.
Great win for us and good luck to Jay at Port.
He'll be a good player at Port but hes not gonna
be a good player at Richmond.
Title: Re: 3-way deal: Jordan McMahon to Tigers, Schulz to Port, Damon White to Dogs
Post by: Passionfruit on October 10, 2007, 07:14:15 PM
McMahon is crap footballer, you can only pray he doesnt come to punt road , if he does , it will be another spoon on the way.
We want to get rid of duds and replace them with DUDS!
Title: Re: 3-way deal: Jordan McMahon to Tigers, Schulz to Port, Damon White to Dogs
Post by: Ramps on October 10, 2007, 07:41:20 PM
Id just try for a ruckman at this stage and forget the rest. Im happy with our picks although I be happier if we could snare another pick.
Title: Re: 3-way deal: Jordan McMahon to Tigers, Schulz to Port, Damon White to Dogs
Post by: Passionfruit on October 10, 2007, 07:54:35 PM
Id just try for a ruckman at this stage and forget the rest. Im happy with our picks although I be happier if we could snare another pick.

Correct!
Title: Re: 3-way deal: Jordan McMahon to Tigers, Schulz to Port, Damon White to Dogs
Post by: Passionfruit on October 10, 2007, 07:58:40 PM
Reported 1m for 3 years.
We are ratshit if this is true.
We are being run by idiots if this is the case
Title: Re: 3-way deal: Jordan McMahon to Tigers, Schulz to Port, Damon White to Dogs
Post by: Ramps on October 10, 2007, 08:01:22 PM
Your not telling us that we've offered 330k a year to McMahon...surely. >:(
Title: Re: 3-way deal: Jordan McMahon to Tigers, Schulz to Port, Damon White to Dogs
Post by: Passionfruit on October 10, 2007, 08:10:18 PM
Your not telling us that we've offered 330k a year to McMahon...surely. >:(

YEP!
Title: Re: 3-way deal: Jordan McMahon to Tigers, Schulz to Port, Damon White to Dogs
Post by: Ramps on October 10, 2007, 08:13:40 PM
IMHO thats a disgrace.

RFC should walk away from all the crap trades, look for a cheap ruckman like Moran and keep our picks.
Title: Re: 3-way deal: Jordan McMahon to Tigers, Schulz to Port, Damon White to Dogs
Post by: {X} on October 10, 2007, 08:17:23 PM
miller is surely out to kill us if this is correct
Title: Re: 3-way deal: Jordan McMahon to Tigers, Schulz to Port, Damon White to Dogs
Post by: mightytiges on October 10, 2007, 08:24:12 PM
Your not telling us that we've offered 330k a year to McMahon...surely. >:(
:gobdrop

There are so many contradictory reports of trades tonight. Others have got McMahon off to Port and he had a medical tonight. Let's hope 3aw were talking crap like they did last night saying we a strong chance of getting Judd after offering picks 2 & 18 ::).
Title: Dogs want pick 18 for McMahon
Post by: one-eyed on October 11, 2007, 04:26:04 AM
The Dogs want pick 18 from the Tigers or pick 16 from Port for McMahon, not White, so that they can remain in the second round of the draft.

Link. (http://realfooty.com.au/news/news/shaw-might-head-to-brisbane/2007/10/10/1191695990919.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap1)

McMahon will fly to Adelaide today to discuss his future with Port Adelaide officials. Power football manager Peter Rohde coached McMahon at the Dogs and the player has family in Adelaide. It is believed the Power threw up Damon White as a direct swap for McMahon, but the Dogs flatly refused the offer.

If McMahon goes, the Dogs are expecting quality compensation.

Richmond may have to throw up pick No. 18 or No. 19 to get McMahon to Punt Rd.

Link. (http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,22565726-11088,00.html)

Richmond moved a step closer to recruiting out-of-contract Western Bulldogs defender Jordan McMahon by offering him a lucrative three-year contract.

Link. (http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22564873-5012432,00.html)
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: {X} on October 11, 2007, 06:24:39 AM
someone stop this frikken nightmare

if this is miller thinking we are being "active" he is wrong, he is planting a bomb at tigerland and out to destroy us
Title: Re: 3-way deal: Jordan McMahon to Tigers, Schulz to Port, Damon White to Dogs
Post by: Passionfruit on October 11, 2007, 06:32:04 AM
Reported 1m for 3 years.
We are ratpooh if this is true.
We are being run by idiots if this is the case


Looks like its true,as per todays Herald Sun. 1m for 3 years ::)
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Ramps on October 11, 2007, 06:46:33 AM
this is rubbish the Board and the President should VETO all this poo.
Title: Re: 3-way deal: Jordan McMahon to Tigers, Schulz to Port, Damon White to Dogs
Post by: Gordon Bennett on October 11, 2007, 08:03:10 AM
Reported 1m for 3 years.
We are ratpooh if this is true.
We are being run by idiots if this is the case


Looks like its true,as per todays Herald Sun. 1m for 3 years ::)
They said "lucrative". That is not proof that your figure is "true". People should not take what you say as gospel, because your credibility is severely damaged following your many comments about Wallace walking and Sheedy definitely coaching somewhere next year.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: DallasCrane on October 11, 2007, 09:58:22 AM
If the Dogs want to remain in the 2nd round of the draft, they can have our pick 30 that we will get off WCE, not 18.

I would make McMahon's contract conditional on losing his pathetic moustache.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: wayne on October 11, 2007, 10:05:58 AM
If the Dogs want to remain in the 2nd round of the draft, they can have our pick 30 that we will get off WCE, not 18.

I would make McMahon's contract conditional on losing his pathetic moustache.

lol

Careful he might find you and go 'loco'.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: tiga on October 11, 2007, 10:08:37 AM
McMahon isn't as bad as people make out. Last season he had 30 & 22 possies against the premiers and had double figure possies
in every game except for one. I'm not saying that posessions are the only indicator to a players performance but at least he gets his hands
on the pill and his delivery is actually pretty sound. Well a lot better than some of our existing players. Sure he's not a muscle man but he sweeps the backline well and is capable of moving forward to kick goals if need be.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: blaisee on October 11, 2007, 10:20:45 AM
LOL at jack and his football knowledge

Shultz according to jack is the worst player in the afl, but chocco wants him, I reckon chocco knows a bit more about football then you do mate ::)

Mcmahon is one of the best kicks in the afl, we would be lucky to get him'

cant please some fans, complain about a lack of skill, yet still complain when we try and recruit quick skillful players

oh well thankfully rfc make their own decisions are not swayed by disgruntled ex employees with not so "hidden" agendas
 :sleep
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: DallasCrane on October 11, 2007, 10:33:41 AM
Did anyone actually see McMahon in the 2nd half of the season, his kicking was atrocious, his decision making was awful, something is wrong...
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: DallasCrane on October 11, 2007, 10:34:13 AM
If the Dogs want to remain in the 2nd round of the draft, they can have our pick 30 that we will get off WCE, not 18.

I would make McMahon's contract conditional on losing his pathetic moustache.

lol

Careful he might find you and go 'loco'.


Loco?
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Ramps on October 11, 2007, 10:36:28 AM
Did anyone actually see McMahon in the 2nd half of the season, his kicking was atrocious, his decision making was awful, something is wrong...

I did and his disposal last season wasnt the best.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: mjs on October 11, 2007, 11:39:28 AM
Did anyone actually see McMahon in the 2nd half of the season, his kicking was atrocious, his decision making was awful, something is wrong...

I did and his disposal last season wasnt the best.

fwiw I asked a friend who goes to every Bulldogs game what they thought of him

quote " hmm, he runs very fast and kicks poorly"

However three teams want him - Bullies, Port and us - so he has value.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: tigersalive on October 11, 2007, 11:55:25 AM
Did anyone actually see McMahon in the 2nd half of the season, his kicking was atrocious, his decision making was awful, something is wrong...

I did and his disposal last season wasnt the best.

fwiw I asked a friend who goes to every Bulldogs game what they thought of him

quote " hmm, he runs very fast and kicks poorly"

However three teams want him - Bullies, Port and us - so he has value.

Done deal then.  He'll fit right in.   :shh
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: wayne on October 11, 2007, 12:10:35 PM
If the Dogs want to remain in the 2nd round of the draft, they can have our pick 30 that we will get off WCE, not 18.

I would make McMahon's contract conditional on losing his pathetic moustache.

lol

Careful he might find you and go 'loco'.


 

Loco?

His moustache reminds me of a Latino...

Loco
etim. Spanish for "crazy", "insane", "mad".
Ese tío está loco
("That guy's crazy")


 :lol
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: DallasCrane on October 11, 2007, 12:23:00 PM
 :lol

I know a guy who's loco Wayne, I think you know who I'm talking about!
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: mightytiges on October 11, 2007, 02:10:53 PM
Did anyone actually see McMahon in the 2nd half of the season, his kicking was atrocious, his decision making was awful, something is wrong...

I did and his disposal last season wasnt the best.
It didn't help that the doggies had no height up forward to kick to. Opposition sides worked them out by clogging the space in front of Brad Johnson and it left the doggies playing ring-a-rosy handball and short-chipping by foot in the midfield until they turned it over.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: wayne on October 11, 2007, 02:19:45 PM
:lol

I know a guy who's loco Wayne, I think you know who I'm talking about!

I'm going to see him this weekend....  :o
Title: Re: 3-way deal: Jordan McMahon to Tigers, Schulz to Port, Damon White to Dogs
Post by: Passionfruit on October 11, 2007, 05:54:03 PM
Reported 1m for 3 years.
We are ratpooh if this is true.
We are being run by idiots if this is the case


Looks like its true,as per todays Herald Sun. 1m for 3 years ::)
They said "lucrative". That is not proof that your figure is "true". People should not take what you say as gospel, because your credibility is severely damaged following your many comments about Wallace walking and Sheedy definitely coaching somewhere next year.


Gordon, PM me in round 12 next year ;)
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Passionfruit on October 11, 2007, 05:56:09 PM
LOL at jack and his football knowledge

Shultz according to jack is the worst player in the afl, but chocco wants him, I reckon chocco knows a bit more about football then you do mate ::)

Mcmahon is one of the best kicks in the afl, we would be lucky to get him'

cant please some fans, complain about a lack of skill, yet still complain when we try and recruit quick skillful players

oh well thankfully rfc make their own decisions are not swayed by disgruntled ex employees with not so "hidden" agendas
 :sleep


Hey Mate.
Didnt say Schultz was the worst player going around, just said he couldnt play.
The worst 2 are JON and Meyer, they are terrible.
Mate if you cant get a game with the bottom team, what hope do you have, get real
Title: Re: 3-way deal: Jordan McMahon to Tigers, Schulz to Port, Damon White to Dogs
Post by: Ramps on October 11, 2007, 05:58:08 PM
Reported 1m for 3 years.
We are ratpooh if this is true.
We are being run by idiots if this is the case


Looks like its true,as per todays Herald Sun. 1m for 3 years ::)
They said "lucrative". That is not proof that your figure is "true". People should not take what you say as gospel, because your credibility is severely damaged following your many comments about Wallace walking and Sheedy definitely coaching somewhere next year.


Gordon, PM me in round 12 next year ;)


Dont worry Jacko, Gordons after everyone today, we are all alarmists lol, everything will be okay Jacko- Ok because they know what there doing supposedly.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Passionfruit on October 11, 2007, 06:00:08 PM
Hey Gordon, stick to the topic son.
McMahon at $330,000  a year, now how many memebers is that?.
There dreaming. Rather Tiva at $175,000 thanks
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: bluey_21 on October 11, 2007, 09:44:41 PM
Hey Gordon, stick to the topic son.
McMahon at $330,000  a year, now how many memebers is that?.
There dreaming. Rather Tiva at $175,000 thanks

... rather have one player less on our list  :thumbsup
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: one-eyed on October 11, 2007, 09:51:58 PM
5AA radio mentioned that McMahon has told Port that he prefers to be traded to Richmond

http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/showpost.php?p=9154324&postcount=100
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: bluey_21 on October 11, 2007, 09:55:34 PM
5AA radio mentioned that McMahon has told Port that he prefers to be traded to Richmond

http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/showpost.php?p=9154324&postcount=100

please don't go for the quick fix, please
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Passionfruit on October 11, 2007, 10:12:48 PM
5AA radio mentioned that McMahon has told Port that he prefers to be traded to Richmond

http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/showpost.php?p=9154324&postcount=100

please don't go for the quick fix, please

Hey ,it could of been worse than McMahon, Plough might want to re-invent Mark Alvey  again :gobdrop :gobdrop :gobdrop :gobdrop :gobdrop :gobdrop :gobdrop :gobdrop :gobdrop :gobdrop :gobdrop :gobdrop :gobdrop :gobdrop
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Tigermonk on October 11, 2007, 10:20:25 PM
 :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol Quick fix Richmond
there never fixed anything yet there still wooden spooners thats there fix
no money no good players all the poo comes to Tigerland to expand there games tally or finish there careers giving nothing in return
we are every clubs prey
what jackstar said is true if you cant get a game with the wooden spooners your worthless as a player
sad but there the facts  ;D
Title: McMahon picks Tigers over Port (The Age)
Post by: one-eyed on October 12, 2007, 03:31:17 AM
McMahon picks Tigers over Port
Stephen Rielly | October 12, 2007

RICHMOND last night put Jordan McMahon into a yellow and black jumper, with the Western Bulldog defender choosing the Tigers over Port Adelaide for a three-year deal worth almost $1 million.

McMahon, 24, informed the Tigers of his decision in the early evening after earlier visiting Port in his home state.

His decision will give the Dogs Richmond's priority pick, selection 18

http://realfooty.com.au/news/news/mcmahon-picks-tigers-over-port/2007/10/11/1191696082792.html?page=fullpage
Title: Tigers do deal for McMahon (Herald-Sun)
Post by: one-eyed on October 12, 2007, 03:34:23 AM
Tigers do deal for McMahon
12 October 2007   Herald Sun
Mark Stevens

JORDAN McMahon will be re-united with his former coach Terry Wallace after Richmond last night snared the dashing Western Bulldogs defender.

McMahon visited Port Adelaide for talks yesterday, but later decided to cross to Punt Rd on a lucrative three-year deal.

The Dogs will receive pick 19 from the Tigers in return, but minor shuffling of draft places could also be involved today.

McMahon, a ball-carrier with a deadly left foot, will add polish to a Richmond team too often sloppy by foot.

Richmond director of football Greg Miller said McMahon, along with another certain newcomer, West Coast's Mitch Morton, would add to the Tigers' skill level.

"I think with Mitch Morton and Jordan McMahon we've added great kicking ability," he said.

"We see that as an absolutely vital part of the game. I think Richo (Matthew Richardson) and Browny (Nathan Brown) would be pretty pleased with those signings."

McMahon started his career under Wallace at the Bulldogs after being selected at No. 10 in the 2000 draft.

http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/footy/common/story_page/0,8033,22572567%255E19742,00.html
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Ramps on October 12, 2007, 05:16:23 AM
i think we overpaid for mcmahon.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: cub on October 12, 2007, 05:43:44 AM
i think we overpaid for mcmahon.
:yep
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: {X} on October 12, 2007, 07:22:37 AM
the good news is that everytime we have traded with the dogs, we have done well and that ex doggy became a damn good tiger. lets hope jordy can get his kicking radar back and use his pace and skills and become our next "cameron"
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Tigermonk on October 12, 2007, 07:48:57 AM
the good news is that everytime we have traded with the dogs, we have done well and that ex doggy became a damn good tiger. lets hope jordy can get his kicking radar back and use his pace and skills and become our next "cameron"

you better be right otherwise l comming to steal your boat & fish  ;D
might find he had a bad season to get out ala Patrick Bowden is why he nominated Richmond
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: tigersalive on October 12, 2007, 07:52:43 AM
ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGH!

PICK 19!  Are you stuffing kidding me!?    :banghead

What a nightmare.  The kids a squib.

might as well have kept Fizzer Fiora.  :-\

Really not happy atm.

The SAINTS got the Schneiderman with pick 26 and imho . . .


SCHNEIDER>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>McMahon.




I will get over this and welcome him as a tiger but stuff me itsa shocker of a trade.  :(

Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Tigermonk on October 12, 2007, 08:02:51 AM
l'm more than happy to get McMahon

http://www.afana.com/gallery2/v/wb_rich_rnd4_2007/MLB_6919.jpg.html
Title: Re: Tigers do deal for McMahon (Herald-Sun)
Post by: wayne on October 12, 2007, 09:20:34 AM
Tigers do deal for McMahon
12 October 2007   Herald Sun
Mark Stevens

"I think with Mitch Morton and Jordan McMahon we've added great kicking ability," he said.

"We see that as an absolutely vital part of the game. I think Richo (Matthew Richardson) and Browny (Nathan Brown) would be pretty pleased with those signings."


100 metre stab passes from deep in our defence??
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: mightytiges on October 12, 2007, 11:02:42 AM
Doggie supporters have another reason to hate us lol.

Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: wayne on October 12, 2007, 11:04:24 AM
Doggie supporters have another reason to hate us lol.



I work with an exceptionally bitter one  :lol
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: TIGER 03 on October 12, 2007, 11:29:03 AM
please tell me this is a joke. why offer 18 or 19 for morton, why cant we play hardball and offer 35. if they dont take it PSD, and mcmahon, this rubbish he can hit a target is crap. you cant run the ball out of the back line if you have no one to kick it to. one player isnt going to change the way we transfer the ball out the backline. bent over again tiges.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Ramps on October 12, 2007, 11:47:04 AM
McMahon trade is now complete Bulldogs got 19
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: TIGER 03 on October 12, 2007, 11:49:58 AM
its not on the afl website, which for once is updating as it happens. 11:49
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: tigersalive on October 12, 2007, 11:53:41 AM
its not on the afl website, which for once is updating as it happens. 11:49

Yes it is complete.  A done Deal.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: TIGER 03 on October 12, 2007, 12:01:09 PM
my worst nightmare has just come true. im am guttered.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Ox on October 12, 2007, 12:07:54 PM
the good news is that everytime we have traded with the dogs, we have done well and that ex doggy became a damn good tiger. lets hope jordy can get his kicking radar back and use his pace and skills and become our next "cameron"
yeah.Patty Bowdown is great.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Ramps on October 12, 2007, 12:15:52 PM
The McMahon trade seems to me like its a 100% Wallace trade. Danny Meyer was similar in his draft year, Plough was commentating those games and everyone who saw the coverage knew we were taking Meyer. We missed out on Wood. Anyway we have to support the players who come, but a coach ultimately is responsible if hes picking players and theyre not working out.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: harry bosch on October 12, 2007, 12:24:42 PM
Yup , this is just a repeat of his bulldogs recruiting..

If we had any guts his say in recruiting would be drastically reduced.

Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: mightytiges on October 12, 2007, 01:39:43 PM
As someone on BF said the bright side of McMahon coming to Richmond is no more of those Bulldog Peter Jackson ads  ;D
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: tigersalive on October 12, 2007, 02:38:09 PM
I assume Howat will be shown the door since we have yet another one of him, just a grade up.
Title: Jordan McMahon on SEN
Post by: one-eyed on October 12, 2007, 02:54:16 PM
Jordy of SEN:

* Pretty excited. A bit of a change up for him.

* Played with Glenelg so knows the Tigers' theme song. It's black and yellow btw Jordy not Black and Gold  :wallywink.

* Bulldogs are a great club and he had a great 7 years but it was time for a change. So happy to be at Richmond.

* Richmond approached Jordy and showed how exciting things could be in the future and it went from there.

* What he brings to Richmond - he said without being egotistical he'll add a bit excitement, skill and run to the backline. A bit of experience and leadership too to such a young promising list.

* His manager told him to come back early from holidays in Thailand and signed. It wasn't really a shock as he asked for a change.

* Preseason starts in 2 weeks time. About to get a call from our fitness staff as to when it does start.
Title: Jordan a happy Tiger (RFC)
Post by: one-eyed on October 12, 2007, 04:07:32 PM
(http://mm.afl.com.au/Portals/0/images/clubs/tigers/Jordan-McMahon_tnail.jpg)

Jordan a happy Tiger
3:35 PM Fri 12 October, 2007
Tony Greenberg
for richmondfc.com.au

Jordan McMahon was a teenager the last time he played under coach Terry Wallace, back at the Western Bulldogs in 2002.

Five years on, he renews the relationship with Wallace – this time at Richmond and with 114 AFL games under his belt.

“Terry was my original coach and I had a very good relationship with him.  Of course, it will be a totally different relationship now as a 24-year-old and with a lot more experience in the game,” McMahon said.

“I’m very excited about the move and really believe the change will do me good.

“Richmond, I believe, is one of the four powerhouse Victorian clubs of the competition.  There’s a lot of young talent at the Club and that’s one of the reasons I was so keen to get here – to take on a bit of a leadership role and help with their development.

"The Tigers are not far away from hitting their straps and playing some really good football and I’m very much looking forward to being part of it all.”

Richmond regards McMahon as the archetypal modern-day league player and, as such, is a significant inclusion to the senior list.

“What AFL football’s all about now is run and carry, with good disposal.  And, there’s no doubt that Jordan has excellent kicking ability,” said the Tigers’ Director of Football Greg Miller.

“By adding him and Mitch (Morton) to our side, we’re certainly improving the quality of disposal.

“Not only can Jordan play a similar valuable running role to the one Lindsay Gilbee plays in the backline at the Bulldogs, but he’s also able to play up forward.

“He’s a class player and we fought against Port Adelaide for his services and were rapt to get him.”

http://richmondfc.com.au/Season2007/News/NewsArticle/tabid/6301/Default.aspx?newsId=52444
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: tiga on October 12, 2007, 04:38:55 PM
Welcome to Punt Road Jordan.  :thumbsup

Unlike others here I'm thrilled to have him at Richmond.  :clapping
He will improve our run out of the backline no end and cut out the Kane Johnson/Andrew Raines "Half Back Square Dance". :nopity

In the many games I've seen him play he is a very committed footballer with excellent foot skills.
Also you don't play 114 games in a reasonably solid team like the Bulldogs if you are crap.
I reckon he tanked the second half of last season just so he could get away from Rodney "Mr Happy" Eade! I remember a few good swans were about to the bolt before he was replaced by Roos.  :outtahere
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: one-eyed on October 12, 2007, 04:48:50 PM
Apparently had some issues on the homefront to deal with this year according to the Doggies BF forum.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: rogerd3 on October 12, 2007, 05:19:07 PM
good luck to the guy and hope he does well, personally i would have preferred to hang onto the pick.

Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Fishfinger on October 12, 2007, 05:26:20 PM

Hey ,it could of been worse than McMahon, Plough might want to re-invent Mark Alvey  again
He's never tried to re-invent Alvey. That was Sheeds.....and he failed.
Title: Re: Jordan a happy Tiger (RFC)
Post by: Darth Tiger on October 12, 2007, 05:52:39 PM
(http://mm.afl.com.au/Portals/0/images/clubs/tigers/Jordan-McMahon_tnail.jpg)

Jordan a happy Tiger
3:35 PM Fri 12 October, 2007
Tony Greenberg
for richmondfc.com.au
Richmond regards McMahon as the archetypal modern-day league player and, as such, is a significant inclusion to the senior list.

http://richmondfc.com.au/Season2007/News/NewsArticle/tabid/6301/Default.aspx?newsId=52444

So the Minister for official spin is out there already exposing this utter crap.

Geez, the archetypal player FFS.  What is that squib ??

Squibs on the forward line, now squibs down back - Is that what Wallave & Miller provide as list balance ???!!!!

Where was the trade for need ??
Title: Re: Jordan a happy Tiger (RFC)
Post by: Ramps on October 12, 2007, 05:55:04 PM
(http://mm.afl.com.au/Portals/0/images/clubs/tigers/Jordan-McMahon_tnail.jpg)

Jordan a happy Tiger
3:35 PM Fri 12 October, 2007
Tony Greenberg
for richmondfc.com.au
Richmond regards McMahon as the archetypal modern-day league player and, as such, is a significant inclusion to the senior list.

http://richmondfc.com.au/Season2007/News/NewsArticle/tabid/6301/Default.aspx?newsId=52444

So the Minister for official spin is out there already exposing this utter crap.

Geez, the archetypal player FFS.  What is that squib ??

Squibs on the forward line, now squibs down back - Is that what Wallave & Miller provide as list balance ???!!!!

Where was the trade for need ??

we have no needs we are on the way to success in 2011. why cant anybody see the strategy  :D ;D :help
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Passionfruit on October 12, 2007, 06:00:12 PM

Hey ,it could of been worse than McMahon, Plough might want to re-invent Mark Alvey  again
He's never tried to re-invent Alvey. That was Sheeds.....and he failed.

Can tell you Fish that wallace tried desparately to get Alvey to Richmond from Essendon, even promised him
Title: Re: Jordan a happy Tiger (RFC)
Post by: Passionfruit on October 12, 2007, 06:02:46 PM
(http://mm.afl.com.au/Portals/0/images/clubs/tigers/Jordan-McMahon_tnail.jpg)

Jordan a happy Tiger
3:35 PM Fri 12 October, 2007
Tony Greenberg
for richmondfc.com.au
Richmond regards McMahon as the archetypal modern-day league player and, as such, is a significant inclusion to the senior list.

http://richmondfc.com.au/Season2007/News/NewsArticle/tabid/6301/Default.aspx?newsId=52444

So the Minister for official spin is out there already exposing this utter crap.

Geez, the archetypal player FFS.  What is that squib ??

Squibs on the forward line, now squibs down back - Is that what Wallave & Miller provide as list balance ???!!!!

Where was the trade for need ??

McMahon= lightweight who is too easily pushed aside.
Zones off way too much and is hardly accountable
3 years at 1 Million dollars for that :gobdrop
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: {X} on October 12, 2007, 06:07:39 PM
give him a break jack, he hasnt played a game 4 us yet1

and btw, who cares if he is light on, his average tackle count per game is far better than th erfc average per player, so i guess he is more accountable than 95% of out blokes

lets not crucify any new players and welcome them, u never know they may just surprise you.

where is that good old fair go aussie spirit.

he isnt even down yet and many are already kickintg him in th eguts.

we have tivendale and krak and jay and hyde and ....etc in our team to bag, not the new boys who havent even played a game yet
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Francois Jackson on October 12, 2007, 06:14:04 PM
give him a break jack, he hasnt played a game 4 us yet1

and btw, who cares if he is light on, his average tackle count per game is far better than th erfc average per player, so i guess he is more accountable than 95% of out blokes

lets not crucify any new players and welcome them, u never know they may just surprise you.

where is that good old fair go aussie spirit.

he isnt even down yet and many are already kickintg him in th eguts.

we have tivendale and krak and jay and hyde and ....etc in our team to bag, not the new boys who havent even played a game yet


krak, jay, tivendale and hyde. those 4 names are one of many other reasons why we are the laughing stock of the AFL
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Ox on October 12, 2007, 06:17:10 PM
i agree with X
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: mightytiges on October 12, 2007, 06:35:01 PM
The plan must be to push guys like Kingy, Rainesy and Connors into the midfield next year.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: {X} on October 12, 2007, 06:49:40 PM
i agree with X

bloody hell ())(, u cant agree with me, this is not right  :o, i better mark this day down!
 :lol
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Bull on October 12, 2007, 07:10:30 PM
I hope that both Jordy and Mitch do well.

I was fuming this morning when i read we traded both 18 & 19 for these players.

I am happy that we have retained 18 but would have liked to get a pick in the 20's atleast and think we should have offloaded Shultz for the high 20 pick that Port offered.

Hopefully we can entice a decent player in the pre-season draft.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: bluey_21 on October 12, 2007, 07:25:45 PM
adcock in the PSD and couldn't care less we traded those picks away :thumbsup
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: {X} on October 12, 2007, 07:46:19 PM
adcock in the PSD and couldn't care less we traded those picks away :thumbsup

will adcock be in the psd, do u know that 4 sure?
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: bluey_21 on October 12, 2007, 08:39:15 PM
adcock in the PSD and couldn't care less we traded those picks away :thumbsup

will adcock be in the psd, do u know that 4 sure?

he is out of contract i believe and yet to sign and allegedly wants to come back to victoria. therefore PSD is not out of the question, but reckon the lions will sign him up. They know he is a talented kid and will hell bent on keeping him.

We just have to hope that miller gets off his arse and entices Adcock down or that lions up his pay packet which forces brennan into the PSD

Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: {X} on October 12, 2007, 08:47:07 PM
adcock in the PSD and couldn't care less we traded those picks away :thumbsup

will adcock be in the psd, do u know that 4 sure?

he is out of contract i believe and yet to sign and allegedly wants to come back to victoria. therefore PSD is not out of the question, but reckon the lions will sign him up. They know he is a talented kid and will hell bent on keeping him.

We just have to hope that miller gets off his behind and entices Adcock down or that lions up his pay packet which forces brennan into the PSD



well in that case dont send miller to speak to him, so far this trade week, he was unable to bring anyone across to us.

dont be fooled about mitch and jordy, miller had nothing to do with that.

imo, jordy came cos he wanted to play under wallace.

mitch came because he knows we will pick up cale(i bet cale was told weeks ago we would get him, regardless what waffle is said to the media and fans)

every player who was out of contract that miller spoke to re-signed at their existing clubs, its either thay all hate rfc or millers bs is as clear as day now and he couldnt even give away free maccas to the etheopians, let alone sell it to them!
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Passionfruit on October 12, 2007, 09:24:59 PM
give him a break jack, he hasnt played a game 4 us yet1

and btw, who cares if he is light on, his average tackle count per game is far better than th erfc average per player, so i guess he is more accountable than 95% of out blokes

lets not crucify any new players and welcome them, u never know they may just surprise you.

where is that good old fair go aussie spirit.

he isnt even down yet and many are already kickintg him in th eguts.

we have tivendale and krak and jay and hyde and ....etc in our team to bag, not the new boys who havent even played a game yet

Hey, seen enough of him at the dogs.
No thanks.   $1,000,000 for 3 years ::)
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: torch on October 12, 2007, 09:25:37 PM
i am not happy about this trade ...

soft ... weak ... not hard ... = all the same problem ...

richmond don't need players like this ...

once again i hope i am wrong !!!
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: rogerd3 on October 12, 2007, 10:38:27 PM
it aint 1 mill over 3 years. :-X
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: mightytiges on October 12, 2007, 10:45:58 PM
I am happy that we have retained 18 but would have liked to get a pick in the 20's atleast and think we should have offloaded Shultz for the high 20 pick that Port offered.
I think either we were hoping pick 22 would go from the Dogs to Adelaide to Port to us or Port would swap pick 16 with our 18 on top of pick 28.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Passionfruit on October 12, 2007, 10:55:11 PM
it aint 1 mill over 3 years. :-X

Its more! :'(
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: one-eyed on October 15, 2007, 03:38:29 PM
McMahon excited by Punt Rd move
richmondfc.com.au
12:53 PM Mon 15 October, 2007
By Jason Phelan

RICHMOND recruit Jordan McMahon has spoken of his excitement at the fresh slate provided by his move to Punt Road.

The Tigers exchanged pick 19 overall in November’s NAB AFL National Draft for the dashing half-back flanker after the 24-year-old asked the Bulldogs to trade him following a season when he admits to being troubled by off-field issues.

“I’m very, very happy with the move. I was excited basically when I decided to make the move,” McMahon said at his new club on Monday.

“I had a lot of choices and a lot of decisions to make and it was a gut feeling when it came down to Richmond. I was really excited about the move and I’m really pumped about it actually; we’ve got a good future.

“To be honest with you, I think now is the time where I’m either going to play my best football or I’m not and to be honest with you I think a fresh start is where it’s going to happen.”

The South Australian received interest from both Adelaide clubs, with Port Adelaide the keener of the two to secure his services, before deciding to stay in Melbourne and sign a three-year deal with Richmond.

McMahon agreed the lure of going back home to Adelaide had been strong, but cited a strong off-field support structure at Punt Road as a key factor in his decision-making process.

“I had some issues off-field with family and so forth, and I’m not sure it was handled that well back down at the previous club,” he said.

“I spoke to Richmond about what they could do with things and they had the appropriate measures for it as well and they gave me some good options. I took it from there and I thought it was probably appropriate that I do come across.

“I had some issues off field as well and it came to a point where I had a decision to make: is it best to make a fresh start and get into a new environment?

“I think personally for me at that time, it was just time to have a look around and see what was available. Richmond really put a great offer forward. I think it’s a really young list and a really exciting list. I think there’s a lot of improvement within them as well and I think there’s a big future with them.”

McMahon was dropped from the Dogs’ side for round 21, but while he didn’t entirely agree with the move, he maintained it did not have any bearing on his decision to seek a new football home.

“I think you’d have to ask Rocket [Rodney Eade] that,” he replied when quizzed on his omission from the team that lost heavily to Hawthorn. “He dropped me for a reason. Obviously my form wasn’t great at the time and that’s understandable.

“I got brought back in for the last game and played it out, but my mind wasn’t made up at all by then. When the season finished I had to sit down and assess everything.”

McMahon is yet to meet any of his new teammates, but said he was looking forward to taking the field with them under the guidance of Terry Wallace, who oversaw the first two years of his career at Whitten Oval.

“It’s an exciting prospect actually,” he said of playing in front of the Tigers’ strong supporter base.

“The first time I played in front of 80,000 people was the first final I played for the Western Bulldogs.

“[But] I heard that Richmond had the third-highest attendances during the season out of any club in the AFL and, considering the amount of games they won, that’s not a bad effort.”

http://richmondfc.com.au/Season2007/News/NewsArticle/tabid/6301/Default.aspx?newsId=52490
Title: Tigers the family club for McMahon (Herald-Sun)
Post by: one-eyed on October 16, 2007, 04:00:35 AM
Tigers the family club for McMahon
16 October 2007   Herald Sun
Mark Stevens

 JORDAN McMahon has fired a parting shot at the Western Bulldogs, declaring Richmond is better equipped to provide off-field support for players.

McMahon, traded to the Tigers for draft pick No. 19 last week, battled family issues this season after his partner and their young daughter returned to Adelaide.

And McMahon yesterday indicated the Dogs could have done more to help.

"I had some personal issues off-field with family. I'm not sure it was handled that well back down at the previous club," McMahon said.

McMahon said the Tigers' beefed-up welfare and development program was a key factor in his decision to move to Punt Rd.

"There was definitely support (at the Bulldogs). The issue for me was is there something better for me that will help my football?" McMahon said.

"I spoke to Richmond about what they could do and they had appropriate measures.

"They've got in place a really good environment where they've got a lot of support."

Bulldogs coach Rodney Eade was yesterday surprised by McMahon's comments.

"We are comfortable with the support systems we have in place and we are comfortable with the level of support we provided Jordan," Eade said.

"We wish him the best and we'll move on."

McMahon has earned a significant pay rise by crossing to Richmond. It is understood he will earn slightly more than $1 million over three years.

McMahon split with girlfriend, Adelaide model Rebecca McLure, during the season. She returned home with their one-year-old daughter Lila. The 24-year-old's form dropped away and he was banished to VFL affiliate club Werribee as the Dogs' tilt at the finals faded.

"He (Eade) dropped me for a reason. Obviously my form wasn't great at that time. That's understandable," McMahon said.

"I got brought back for the last game and played it out."

McMahon said being dropped to the VFL was when he decided it was best to move on.

"When the season finished I assessed everything," he said.

"I had a lot of choices to make. It was a gut feeling when it came down to Richmond. I'm really pumped about it, actually. There's a good future."

McMahon, recruited from Glenelg, met Port Adelaide officials, but decided against a move home.

After 114 games, McMahon is confident he is ready to play his best football under Terry Wallace, his coach for his first two years at Whitten Oval.

"He's got an attacking style of football he wants to play and I reckon I can fit pretty well into that," McMahon said.

Richmond football director Greg Miller said McMahon would improve the Tigers' skill level. "His disposal is one of the better in the AFL," he said.

But while McMahon's kicking can be deadly when on song, Champion Data stats reveal he can also misfire.

He recorded a kicking efficiency rate of 75.4 per cent last season. Champion Data rates that as below average for a defender.

But what McMahon will definitely provide is rebound. The dashing defender was No. 1 at the Dogs for running bounces last year.

http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/footy/common/story_page/0,8033,22591549%255E19742,00.html
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Tigermonk on October 16, 2007, 06:19:38 PM
exactly what l been ranting about & he aint even pulled the boots on & his mouthing off about his old club
they will target him for sure & give us a belting
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: richmondrules on October 16, 2007, 06:24:46 PM
exactly what l been ranting about & he aint even pulled the boots on & his mouthing off about his old club
they will target him for sure & give us a belting


Well we'd better just belt them first. I don't know about anyone else but I'm just about sick of being the team others can give a belting too at will. As far as I'm concerned it's time for us to be able to say what we like and not worry about other teams taking offence and walloping us. Let them take offence and then let them lose. Time to drop the loser attitude.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: mightytiges on October 16, 2007, 07:45:39 PM
Given we already have Wallace, Browny, Paddy and Gordon Casey, one more Bulldog crossing over to Punt Rd won't really make a difference as far as their fans hating us. For two clubs that supposedly hate each other since 2001, we've had a pretty good relationship at the trade table and in each other's coaching boxes. Apart from Rodney Eade, ex-Tigers Cambo and Leon are the only ones who haven't left Whitten Oval over the past few weeks.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Passionfruit on October 17, 2007, 05:35:48 PM
it aint 1 mill over 3 years. :-X

Its a fact it is!
Title: New Tigers in focus: Jordan McMahon (RFC)
Post by: one-eyed on December 10, 2007, 04:10:58 PM
New Tigers in focus: Jordan McMahon
2:16 PM Mon 10 December, 2007
By Ben Broad
for richmondfc.com.au

Click here (http://javascript:void window.open('http://bigpondvideo.com/afl/42775')) to see how Jordan McMahon has viewed his first few weeks at Punt Rd. Keep an eye out on richmondfc.com.au for more video insights into how fellow recruit Mitch Morton, as well as new draftees Trent Cotchin, Alex Rance and Dean Put, have fitted in at Tigerland.

IF JORDAN McMahon didn't remember Terry Wallace's ways at the Western Bulldogs, it didn't take long for his former coach's methods to come flooding back after arriving at Punt Road.

McMahon, one of the Tigers' key signings during the off-season, is enjoying a solid pre-season in his new colours.

He is eager to make a new start across town after admitting he became a little stale in seven years at the kennel.

However he had to stay as fresh as possible for one of the Tigers' early off-season sessions, one of which McMahon recalled from his earlier days under Wallace.

"There was a session years ago [when at the Bulldogs] when there was a game called 'The Rings'," McMahon said.

"I hadn't done them for a long time and three or four sessions into training with Richmond the rings came back out…they're not a pleasant exercise or drill to do during football."

Now into his eighth summer at AFL level, the 24-year-old considers himself seasoned enough to handle anything fitness staff throws in his direction.

Although he admitted The Rings was not among his favourite drills.

"It's just two rings set up at either end and it's just back and forth, back and forth," McMahon explained.

"There's two teams going from one end to the other with one ball, trying to get it through the ring and it's just continuous.

"Just non-stop and it's actually really gruelling, very taxing."

McMahon is excited by the youth at the Tigers, and said he was surprised to find he was among a group of older players when training resumed.

But he doesn't believe having such a young list is a negative.

"That's the really good thing about them, they're young and they're exciting and I think that makes pre-season a lot more exciting…they're pretty happy to be here," he said.

While the Tigers are setting a cracking pace on the training track, McMahon says a few, in particular, look destined for big things in 2008.

"Nathan Foley can run; he's good at just consistently running, repeating efforts," McMahon said.

"And I reckon Brett Deledio [is flying]. 'Lids' is a pretty solid player at the moment. He's pretty powerful, pretty strong, he's built up a lot and he's quick too, so I think he's a bit of a package at the moment and he could show a lot this year, I reckon."

All things going well, McMahon expects a much-improved Richmond outfit next season.

After a disappointing 2007, the Tigers faithful hope to be singing the famous club song on a more regular basis next year.

And McMahon admits he can't wait to sing the 'Yellow and Black'.

"To be honest with you, there were two things about moving to Richmond [that particularly appealed]," he said.

"My mate said, 'You know it's really great that you've moved because it's good colours and a good club song'.

"That's the one thing nearly every person has said to me: 'You've finally got a team with a good theme song'.

"I played for a Tigers team when I was younger with the same song and I appreciate it. It's a good song."

http://www.richmondfc.com.au/Default.aspx?tabid=6301&newsId=54154
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: richmondrules on December 10, 2007, 05:08:36 PM
Good on you Jordy. Sounds like a nice guy and sounds excited to be with us. I know there has been a bit of discussion about whether we should have used pick 19 on him but I am sure we will all support him 100% in 2008. After all it was not his decision to use the pick.

Good to hear that Lids is impressing. Sounds exciting.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Francois Jackson on December 10, 2007, 07:11:30 PM
u know ive bagged this bloke but one thing that stands out for me is he actually seems happy to play for the tigers. he has a heap of enthusiasm which is really good to see.

Title: Re: Jordan McMahon on SEN
Post by: wayne on April 22, 2010, 09:00:56 AM
Jordy of SEN:

* Richmond approached Jordy and showed how exciting things could be in the future and it went from there.

 :lol

I bet the future didn't show him playing Coburg reserves.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon on SEN
Post by: Ramps on April 22, 2010, 09:02:01 AM
Jordy of SEN:

* Richmond approached Jordy and showed how exciting things could be in the future and it went from there.

 :lol

I bet the future didn't show him playing Coburg reserves.

I deleted my post and created a new thread ... my apologies. Just shows how stuffed we are as a club IMHO.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: TigerLand on April 22, 2010, 09:57:55 AM
If we got rid of Schultz when we should have for pick 16.
We could have drafted Matthew Lobbe the 200cm Ruckman.

If we didn't draft Jordan McMahon we would have Callan Ward.

*shakes head*
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Smokey on April 22, 2010, 10:22:03 AM
And if we hadn't made so many mistakes since 1975 we would have won a lot more premierships.

And if we didn't have the best supporter base in the league we would not be in existence.

And if we don't keep supporting and believing then we might go that way anyway.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: TigerLand on April 22, 2010, 10:37:43 AM
Smoke,

I'm sick of the "If's" and "Buts" aswell.

It's not like we have heaps to talk about at the present.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: TigerTimeII on April 22, 2010, 10:50:54 AM
my grandma has come back from th edead and is considering playing afl, and guess what the tigers and miller are interested and will speak to her manager


bloody hell, we are after every single player apparantly lol

rip nonna

never realised how funny i am lol

maybe not
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Smokey on April 22, 2010, 02:01:00 PM
Smoke,

I'm sick of the "If's" and "Buts" aswell.

It's not like we have heaps to talk about at the present.

Sadly, yes.   :'(
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: jackstar is back again on April 22, 2010, 03:38:17 PM
Welcome to Punt Road Jordan.  :thumbsup

Unlike others here I'm thrilled to have him at Richmond.  :clapping
He will improve our run out of the backline no end and cut out the Kane Johnson/Andrew Raines "Half Back Square Dance". :nopity

In the many games I've seen him play he is a very committed footballer with excellent foot skills.
Also you don't play 114 games in a reasonably solid team like the Bulldogs if you are crap.
I reckon he tanked the second half of last season just so he could get away from Rodney "Mr Happy" Eade! I remember a few good swans were about to the bolt before he was replaced by Roos.  :outtahere


mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: tigersalive on April 22, 2010, 03:56:55 PM
If we are doing this with hindsight I'll be to bring up my post from after the trade.  ;D
 
ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGH!

PICK 19!  Are you effing kidding me!?    :banghead

What a nightmare.  The kids a squib.

might as well have kept Fizzer Fiora.  :-\

Really not happy atm.

The SAINTS got the Schneiderman with pick 26 and imho . . .


SCHNEIDER>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>McMahon.




I will get over this and welcome him as a tiger but eff me itsa shocker of a trade.  :(



I thought I would get over it anyway but even now it poos me to tears.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Tigermonk on April 22, 2010, 05:09:16 PM
3rd year & the DUD has given nothing
another wasted pick 19 traded for a Bozo who was nothing but a 2nd tier VFL player at best when drafted  :rollin
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: jackstar is back again on April 22, 2010, 07:17:45 PM
i think this is all too funny.
I bagged him when he first come here.
He only played 7 games at the dogs the year before he came to us.
most of the nuffers on here were saying give him a go :banghead
Its a disgrace and it doesnt surprise me to see us on the bottom.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: jackstar is back again on April 22, 2010, 07:23:44 PM
LOL at jack and his football knowledge

Shultz according to jack is the worst player in the afl, but chocco wants him, I reckon chocco knows a bit more about football then you do mate ::)

Mcmahon is one of the best kicks in the afl, we would be lucky to get him'

cant please some fans, complain about a lack of skill, yet still complain when we try and recruit quick skillful players

oh well thankfully rfc make their own decisions are not swayed by disgruntled ex employees with not so "hidden" agendas
 :sleep


Well well well, Blaisee, you know your football ::) ::) ::)
Title: Re: 3-way deal: Jordan McMahon to Tigers, Schulz to Port, Damon White to Dogs
Post by: jackstar is back again on April 22, 2010, 07:24:42 PM
McMahon is crap footballer, you can only pray he doesnt come to punt road , if he does , it will be another spoon on the way.
We want to get rid of duds and replace them with DUDS!

This poster was on the money :thumbsup
Title: Re: 3-way deal: Jordan McMahon to Tigers, Schulz to Port, Damon White to Dogs
Post by: jackstar is back again on April 22, 2010, 07:26:22 PM
Reported 1m for 3 years.
We are ratpooh if this is true.
We are being run by idiots if this is the case


Looks like its true,as per todays Herald Sun. 1m for 3 years ::)
They said "lucrative". That is not proof that your figure is "true". People should not take what you say as gospel, because your credibility is severely damaged following your many comments about Wallace walking and Sheedy definitely coaching somewhere next year.

Hey Gordon, was on the ball again in my friend :thumbsup.
Bit wrong about the Sheedy date though, sorry about that
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: jackstar is back again on April 22, 2010, 07:28:59 PM
LOL at jack and his football knowledge

Shultz according to jack is the worst player in the afl, but chocco wants him, I reckon chocco knows a bit more about football then you do mate ::)

Mcmahon is one of the best kicks in the afl, we would be lucky to get him'

cant please some fans, complain about a lack of skill, yet still complain when we try and recruit quick skillful players

oh well thankfully rfc make their own decisions are not swayed by disgruntled ex employees with not so "hidden" agendas
 :sleep


Hey Mate.
Didnt say Schultz was the worst player going around, just said he couldnt play.
The worst 2 are JON and Meyer, they are terrible.
Mate if you cant get a game with the bottom team, what hope do you have, get real




mmmmmmmmmmm  Passionfruit= Jackstar ;)
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: TigerTimeII on April 22, 2010, 07:40:50 PM
i think this is all too funny.
I bagged him when he first come here.
He only played 7 games at the dogs the year before he came to us.
most of the nuffers on here were saying give him a go :banghead
Its a disgrace and it doesnt surprise me to see us on the bottom.


yeo , jack, i was a nuffer, ithought once he was here give him a go, now i wish he would pack his bags and go
i will live and learn
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Hellenic Tiger on April 22, 2010, 07:50:41 PM
Hold tight all, he will be gone at seasons end never to return.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: jackstar is back again on April 22, 2010, 07:53:40 PM
Hold tight all, he will be gone at seasons end never to return.

Mate, shouldnt of been there in the first place.
Mail out of the dogs is that they couldnt beleive that we were so desperate for him.
He also had personal issues with Wallace , which make it more unbelieveable he ended up at Punt Rd :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead
$350,000 a year :banghead
That is why we are where we are, ON THE BOTTOM !
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Infamy on April 22, 2010, 07:58:21 PM
i think this is all too funny.
I bagged him when he first come here.
He only played 7 games at the dogs the year before he came to us.
most of the nuffers on here were saying give him a go :banghead
Its a disgrace and it doesnt surprise me to see us on the bottom.

Most nuffers wanted him huh? Have you actually re-read this thread? Everyone except for maybe 2 or 3 didn't want him.
I know I certainly didn't but wasn't posting on OER at the time, plenty of my posts on other forums saying I didn't though
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: jackstar is back again on April 22, 2010, 08:29:34 PM
i think this is all too funny.
I bagged him when he first come here.
He only played 7 games at the dogs the year before he came to us.
most of the nuffers on here were saying give him a go :banghead
Its a disgrace and it doesnt surprise me to see us on the bottom.

Most nuffers wanted him huh? Have you actually re-read this thread? Everyone except for maybe 2 or 3 didn't want him.
I know I certainly didn't but wasn't posting on OER at the time, plenty of my posts on other forums saying I didn't though

Infamy= internet forum "'groupie"" LOL  Thought so :wallywink :wallywink :wallywink :wallywink :wallywink ;)
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Ox on April 22, 2010, 08:32:26 PM
WGAF?

If not for a puss article from Mike Sheehan this topic would have remained dead and buried.

Yet another swing at a club sworn to falter.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: wayne on May 06, 2010, 08:39:33 PM
David Parkin just mentioned on AFL Teams that Scott Clayton and Jordan McMahon had a lengthy discussion a couple of weeks ago after a VFL game.  :pray
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Infamy on May 06, 2010, 08:42:37 PM
David Parkin just mentioned on AFL Teams that Scott Clayton and Jordan McMahon had a lengthy discussion a couple of weeks ago after a VFL game.  :pray
That would be brilliant, we'd get a draft pick for him out of the AFL's formula
Any way we can arrange to have him with the Richmond B&F?
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: wayne on May 06, 2010, 08:50:52 PM
David Parkin just mentioned on AFL Teams that Scott Clayton and Jordan McMahon had a lengthy discussion a couple of weeks ago after a VFL game.  :pray
That would be brilliant, we'd get a draft pick for him out of the AFL's formula
Any way we can arrange to have him with the Richmond B&F?

Former top ten pick, in his physical prime and an amazing 2010 B&F win after missing the first 7 rounds  ;)  ;D
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: TigerLand on May 06, 2010, 08:57:12 PM
I will give Gold Coast our 3rd rounder to simply take him off our hands
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: wayne on May 06, 2010, 08:58:10 PM
I will give Gold Coast our 3rd rounder to simply take him off our hands

No need to do that!

He's out of contract.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Hellenic Tiger on May 06, 2010, 09:05:40 PM
It's just a gutwrenching decision. McMahon or King to GC.

McMahon just to free up more in the salary cap. :thumbsup
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: TigerLand on July 10, 2010, 10:54:01 PM
With our recent form with Jordans bags already packed I think now he's bags have been shipped and landed a long way away.

Will not play another game with the RFC. Thus should not be playing Coburg Seniors. Play a Contin instead.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Infamy on July 11, 2010, 12:11:56 AM
It's just a gutwrenching decision. McMahon or King to GC.

McMahon just to free up more in the salary cap. :thumbsup
That's a pretty easy decision actually
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Francois Jackson on July 11, 2010, 12:22:30 AM
Jordan who. he can go join fat arse Roberts up north for all i care.

so many positives to discuss tonight and he aint one of them.

this non tackling garbage of a footballer does not belong at our football club. GC can take him for pick 250.

Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: 10 FLAGS on October 11, 2011, 10:16:27 PM
LOL at jack and his football knowledge

Shultz according to jack is the worst player in the afl, but chocco wants him, I reckon chocco knows a bit more about football then you do mate ::)

Mcmahon is one of the best kicks in the afl, we would be lucky to get him'

cant please some fans, complain about a lack of skill, yet still complain when we try and recruit quick skillful players

oh well thankfully rfc make their own decisions are not swayed by disgruntled ex employees with not so "hidden" agendas
 :sleep


Another rip snorter thread this one. I suggest people read it from the beginning and we can all get some laughs. Of course people like me are just pot shot from the cheap seat type supporters. Pity that those of us who arent apologists can see the truth but its the same old songs from the same old supporters who come in here year after year defending the indefensible.  :lol ;D
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: 10 FLAGS on October 11, 2011, 10:18:43 PM
McMahon is one of the best kicks in the AFL and we would be lucky to get him. Mr Blaisee with another pearl of wisdom.

Thanks for the laughs  :lol
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Loui Tufga on October 11, 2011, 10:25:29 PM
McMahon is one of the best kicks in the AFL and we would be lucky to get him. Mr Blaisee with another pearl of wisdom.

Thanks for the laughs  :lol

Hey dipstick, least these guys put there neck on the line, you just wait till it all goes to hell then sit back and take pot shots fyom the cheap seats :wallywink :wallywink
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: 10 FLAGS on October 11, 2011, 10:29:03 PM
McMahon is one of the best kicks in the AFL and we would be lucky to get him. Mr Blaisee with another pearl of wisdom.

Thanks for the laughs  :lol

Hey dipstick, least these guys put there neck on the line, you just wait till it all goes to hell then sit back and take pot shots fyom the cheap seats :wallywink :wallywink

I have made lots of early calls INCLUDING annual player gradings which many agreed with and some others didnt. I also clearly remember before the trade for McMahon that I called for the board to VETO the trade.

People who support everything the club does jumped up and down. Anyway, I have made lots of early calls, many of them correct, some incorrect but I have made them. Some of you just dont like the truth and that is that the club hasnt performed for 3 decades. Thats the facts. Thats the sad reality.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Penelope on October 11, 2011, 10:33:24 PM
eff me ramps, no one is denying the club has been crap for 30 years.

let it go, your only digging deeper
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: 10 FLAGS on October 11, 2011, 10:36:25 PM
eff me ramps, no one is denying the club has been crap for 30 years.

let it go, your only digging deeper

According to you and some others who disagree with my opinion. I have simply said that I feel Richmond supporters deserve better and that I will not just subscribe to the view that I should support everything the club does. That is all.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Yeahright on October 11, 2011, 10:37:02 PM
McMahon is one of the best kicks in the AFL and we would be lucky to get him. Mr Blaisee with another pearl of wisdom.

Thanks for the laughs  :lol

Your a dead set wanker
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: 10 FLAGS on October 11, 2011, 10:38:24 PM
McMahon is one of the best kicks in the AFL and we would be lucky to get him. Mr Blaisee with another pearl of wisdom.

Thanks for the laughs  :lol

Your a dead set wanker

No worries champ  ;D
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Penelope on October 11, 2011, 10:41:05 PM
eff me ramps, no one is denying the club has been crap for 30 years.

let it go, your only digging deeper

According to you and some others who disagree with my opinion. I have simply said that I feel Richmond supporters deserve better and that I will not just subscribe to the view that I should support everything the club does. That is all.

Yet you wont say what that better is?  :huh
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Loui Tufga on October 11, 2011, 10:52:36 PM
McMahon is one of the best kicks in the AFL and we would be lucky to get him. Mr Blaisee with another pearl of wisdom.

Thanks for the laughs  :lol

Hey dipstick, least these guys put there neck on the line, you just wait till it all goes to hell then sit back and take pot shots fyom the cheap seats :wallywink :wallywink
I have made lots of early calls INCLUDING annual player gradings which many agreed with and some others didnt. I also clearly remember before the trade for McMahon that I called for the board to VETO the trade.
People who support everything the club does jumped up and down. Anyway, I have made lots of early calls, many of them correct, some incorrect but I have made them. Some of you just dont like the truth and that is that the club hasnt performed for 3 decades. Thats the facts. Thats the sad reality.

I completely understand where the club is at ATM probally more so than you! Surly for the first time in 30 years you are seeing the club move forward all be it slowly? We have cut our list to the bone the last 2 seasons and are doing what we can to replenish our stocks with kids but this is the problem we are just kids!! It is fact we have a younger side than the gold coast and we have not been given a single concession or hand out by the AFL.
We are behind the 8 ball big time but magic aint going to happen overnight....We are moving forward, dragging up the past at every corner isn't going to help us!
If your happy to dwell on the past then good for you but if I was you I would start seeking help now because the sad truth is we have a few seasons to go yet!!
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: blaisee on October 12, 2011, 09:46:33 AM
McMahon is one of the best kicks in the AFL and we would be lucky to get him. Mr Blaisee with another pearl of wisdom.

Thanks for the laughs  :lol


so the best you can do is pull out a post from 4 years ago about me saying mcmahon was a great kick, well, guess what he was. I take it as a real compliment that you are re-reading my posts from FOUR years ago, unfortunately for you I have to admit I am not going to waste my time going through your old posts because the truth is, you have never ever said anything

meaningful
enlightening
or relevant

The Mcmahaon trade was a bust, we got screwed, get over it, it was 4 years ago, alot of things have changed since then, if you can't see that your either
a) not looking hard enough
b) just incapable of understanding the truth due to a inbuilt bias
c) not smart enough to figure it out

You and jack should run away together and live happily ever after in your deluded state.



Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Francois Jackson on October 12, 2011, 10:39:08 AM
LOL at jack and his football knowledge

Shultz according to jack is the worst player in the afl, but chocco wants him, I reckon chocco knows a bit more about football then you do mate ::)

Mcmahon is one of the best kicks in the afl, we would be lucky to get him'

cant please some fans, complain about a lack of skill, yet still complain when we try and recruit quick skillful players

oh well thankfully rfc make their own decisions are not swayed by disgruntled ex employees with not so "hidden" agendas
 :sleep


Another rip snorter thread this one. I suggest people read it from the beginning and we can all get some laughs. Of course people like me are just pot shot from the cheap seat type supporters. Pity that those of us who arent apologists can see the truth but its the same old songs from the same old supporters who come in here year after year defending the indefensible.  :lol ;D

let it go Ramps. Same old people who cant handle a blunt assessment of our footy club.

Truth hurts and yes the same people wouldve defended Mcmahon to the very end


.
eff me ramps, no one is denying the club has been crap for 30 years.

let it go, your only digging deeper

According to you and some others who disagree with my opinion. I have simply said that I feel Richmond supporters deserve better and that I will not just subscribe to the view that I should support everything the club does. That is all.

Yet you wont say what that better is?  :huh

I know you werent asking me AL but IMO better wouldve been and i stress the draft period is not done yet, but better wouldve been to throw up Foley and a compo pick to get another potential A grade.

The club has moved forward, albeit slowly. Evidence of this is the recruit of Gale, Houli for free and this Morris kid, although time will tell how good he is.

I have always maintained i will wait till the end of the this month until i see who they get rid of but i find it very strange how Jackson and Edwards have not been thrown up. Maybe they have who knows but if we are seriously to move forward it must be without spuds like these guys and more of the Rance, Houli type.

Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Loui Tufga on October 12, 2011, 10:47:14 AM


I know you werent asking me AL but IMO better wouldve been and i stress the draft period is not done yet, but better wouldve been to throw up Foley and a compo pick to get another potential A grade.



Considering Ramps won't answer this question maybe you can, Witch potential A grader should we be chasing with Foley and our priority pick?? Who is on the market that you think we should get??
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Francois Jackson on October 12, 2011, 10:59:07 AM


I know you werent asking me AL but IMO better wouldve been and i stress the draft period is not done yet, but better wouldve been to throw up Foley and a compo pick to get another potential A grade.



Considering Ramps won't answer this question maybe you can, Witch potential A grader should we be chasing with Foley and our priority pick?? Who is on the market that you think we should get??

JOM but thats an easy choice because everyone is after him. Truth is i know what you know but it would be good if we could be hungry and just show a bit of balls. Getting Maric in the PSd is an example i would like to see. Tell Crows to get stuffed and get Maric for free

My point is that Foley, has his flaws but many clubs see him as a B grader. Adding to that our comp and we could snare a very good player. That being said a compo pick next year could also land us a very good player next year also.

As i said i will always wait until 31 Oct to see who we select and more importantly who we hold onto.

Jackson and Edwards should be offered up. Players like this, particulary the former, do nothing to improve our clubs on field success. 5 years in the system and still we live in hope. Ive had enough of hope we need to continue the cull of rubbish.

ive come to the realization that our players are that bad no club is interested in them. We have a lot of work to do
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Loui Tufga on October 12, 2011, 11:22:29 AM
I agree with everything you'v said but the problem is the whole GWS thing :banghead
Every club has made sure there required players have secure contracts for this season to prevent being raped by GWS!! This makes it very hard for us or any club to trade for A grade players because A..The player would really want to come to us in the first place and B...The club there from can and will demand Overs for the player because the still contracted.

It's a real catch 22........ Unfortunately I don't think this season is the season to land a big fish no matter what we offer up ::) ::)

I agree with the Maric thing, we need to hold firm with these pricks, anything more than our 3rd rounder will be a disgrace >:( Surely there is some other hack running around in another league we can get to fill the gap if Maric falls through??
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: 10 FLAGS on October 12, 2011, 12:44:24 PM
McMahon is one of the best kicks in the AFL and we would be lucky to get him. Mr Blaisee with another pearl of wisdom.

Thanks for the laughs  :lol


so the best you can do is pull out a post from 4 years ago about me saying mcmahon was a great kick, well, guess what he was. I take it as a real compliment that you are re-reading my posts from FOUR years ago, unfortunately for you I have to admit I am not going to waste my time going through your old posts because the truth is, you have never ever said anything

meaningful
enlightening
or relevant

The Mcmahaon trade was a bust, we got screwed, get over it, it was 4 years ago, alot of things have changed since then, if you can't see that your either
a) not looking hard enough
b) just incapable of understanding the truth due to a inbuilt bias
c) not smart enough to figure it out

You and jack should run away together and live happily ever after in your deluded state.

It took me all of 20 seconds last night to find these posts. If I wanted I could have put up scores more but I didnt because I didnt want to ruin the forum.

So I will tell you why I did it. I did it because every year you and I have this same debate. Every year you tell me the same thing, every year its the same old song. Your just someone who cant handle the truth. The administration and those who have worked in Richmonds recruiting and football department have failed the supporters. Every year you all want us to pay out for memberships, for tiger fighting funds, for jack dyer foundations and the rest. And in the end - all we ever get as supporters is complete poo. Thats the truth!

I didnt like bringing up  these old posts, but you cant keep rolling out the same old poo year in year out. Just come out and say - Yes we failed. We are sorry. We will do better. Will provide hope to the supporters. We will recruit better players. We will recruit bigger name players. But alas this year is the same.

If you think that everyone should just go along with everything your mistaken. Richmond is a famous and storied football club, we are not Amway.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: jezza on October 12, 2011, 12:47:33 PM
What players we attract during trade week is not a key measure by which I assess our club.
By your standards Brisbane of the last 2 years must be an amazing club because they brought in Fevola, Maguire, Raines and Staker.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: gerkin greg on October 12, 2011, 12:51:02 PM
The reality is no clubs pull in the big names in trade week.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: 10 FLAGS on October 12, 2011, 12:51:54 PM
McMahon is one of the best kicks in the AFL and we would be lucky to get him. Mr Blaisee with another pearl of wisdom.

Thanks for the laughs  :lol


so the best you can do is pull out a post from 4 years ago about me saying mcmahon was a great kick, well, guess what he was. I take it as a real compliment that you are re-reading my posts from FOUR years ago, unfortunately for you I have to admit I am not going to waste my time going through your old posts because the truth is, you have never ever said anything

meaningful
enlightening
or relevant

The Mcmahaon trade was a bust, we got screwed, get over it, it was 4 years ago, alot of things have changed since then, if you can't see that your either
a) not looking hard enough
b) just incapable of understanding the truth due to a inbuilt bias
c) not smart enough to figure it out

You and jack should run away together and live happily ever after in your deluded state.

You have to admit though your posts in this thread and the other one in the New Dawn thread they were absolute rip snorters lol. Anyway - for once, try and do the right thing and just admit where we are at as a club and stop defending the indefensible.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: 10 FLAGS on October 12, 2011, 12:54:06 PM
The reality is no clubs pull in the big names in trade week.

Sorry Gerks but some big names have transferred to other clubs during trade weeks over the years.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Loui Tufga on October 12, 2011, 12:54:52 PM
Anyway - for once, try and do the right thing and just admit where we are at as a club and stop defending the indefensible.

In you opinion Exactly where do you think were at as a club??
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Loui Tufga on October 12, 2011, 12:57:07 PM
The reality is no clubs pull in the big names in trade week.

Sorry Gerks but some big names have transferred to other clubs during trade weeks over the years.

lol....Over the years :lol You and the olden days :banghead I supose you have been listening to SEN on your Wireless ;D

Give us some BIG name A graders that are transferring THIS year?? You really need to stop living in the past......
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: 10 FLAGS on October 12, 2011, 12:58:32 PM
Anyway - for once, try and do the right thing and just admit where we are at as a club and stop defending the indefensible.

In you opinion Exactly where do you think were at as a club??

A hell of a long way from winning a flag. A hell of long way away if we dont get some more A grade talent into the club.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Loui Tufga on October 12, 2011, 01:00:04 PM
Anyway - for once, try and do the right thing and just admit where we are at as a club and stop defending the indefensible.

In you opinion Exactly where do you think were at as a club??

A hell of a long way from winning a flag. A hell of long way away if we dont get some more A grade talent into the club.

 :lol :lol :lol :lol So after two seasons of seeing the Club trying to do something about it you ready to give up??
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: 10 FLAGS on October 12, 2011, 01:02:24 PM
The reality is no clubs pull in the big names in trade week.

Sorry Gerks but some big names have transferred to other clubs during trade weeks over the years.

lol....Over the years :lol You and the olden days :banghead I supose you have been listening to SEN on your Wireless ;D

Give us some BIG name A graders that are transferring THIS year?? You really need to stop living in the past......

You dont have to go back that far to be honest to see A graders like Judd transferring from West Coast to Carlton. Carlton were a rabble. Judd has saved that club from being in the mire, which is were we have been for 3 decades. Josh Kennedy went the other way. Thats just one of recent note. This year, Mitch Clark is someone who is a big name he will get transferred but according to our footy department he cost to much. Trade week hasnt ended yet so we will see how it all ends up on Monday.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: 10 FLAGS on October 12, 2011, 01:04:09 PM
Anyway - for once, try and do the right thing and just admit where we are at as a club and stop defending the indefensible.

In you opinion Exactly where do you think were at as a club??

A hell of a long way from winning a flag. A hell of long way away if we dont get some more A grade talent into the club.

 :lol :lol :lol :lol So after two seasons of seeing the Club trying to do something about it you ready to give up??

Mate every Richmond administration over the last 3 decades has promised to do something about it. This one is breaking there balls to bring Ivan Maric to Punt Road  :lol
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Loui Tufga on October 12, 2011, 01:12:48 PM
Clarke is no where near the Judd mould :lol If we had made a play for Judd we would have had to give up Pick 2 (Cotchin) pick 18 (Rance) and most likely Jack Lid's! Judd has been great for Carlton but he has had support around him IMO getting Judd would have set us back another 10 years.
 
So what your saying is if we don't get Clarke this trade period then we have failed??
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Loui Tufga on October 12, 2011, 01:14:06 PM

Mate every Richmond administration over the last 3 decades has promised to do something about it. This one is breaking there balls to bring Ivan Maric to Punt Road  :lol

So you'v gone from living in the past to predicting the future  :lol :lol You need to be on the board...
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: 10 FLAGS on October 12, 2011, 01:19:02 PM
Clarke is no where near the Judd mould :lol If we had made a play for Judd we would have had to give up Pick 2 (Cotchin) pick 18 (Rance) and most likely Jack Lid's! Judd has been great for Carlton but he has had support around him IMO getting Judd would have set us back another 10 years.
 
So what your saying is if we don't get Clarke this trade period then we have failed??

I was asked to provide the names of big name players who have transferred. I did that. Clarke would be a good get IMHO but alas according to our footy department he costs too much lol. A pass mark for me would be:

Tom Gillies from Geelong
Tom Nicholls from Brisbane
Luke Brown from Norwood as a Pre listed Player

A successful trade period that gives real hope for the future means

a pick in the U17 draft
or a big name player from another club.

Lets be honest I havent set the bar very high because Im not expecting us to do much but as always and as I have said, I will apologise on Monday if they produce a big name player.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: JVT on October 12, 2011, 01:23:33 PM
Clarke is no where near the Judd mould :lol If we had made a play for Judd we would have had to give up Pick 2 (Cotchin) pick 18 (Rance) and most likely Jack Lid's! Judd has been great for Carlton but he has had support around him IMO getting Judd would have set us back another 10 years.
 
So what your saying is if we don't get Clarke this trade period then we have failed??

I was asked to provide the names of big name players who have transferred. I did that. Clarke would be a good get IMHO but alas according to our footy department he costs too much lol. A pass mark for me would be:

Tom Gillies from Geelong
Tom Nicholls from Brisbane
Luke Brown from Norwood as a Pre listed Player

A successful trade period that gives real hope for the future means

a pick in the U17 draft
or a big name player from another club.

Lets be honest I havent set the bar very high because Im not expecting us to do much but as always and as I have said, I will apologise on Monday if they produce a big name player.
The thing is, all that is achievable, but what are you willing to see let go to get this done?

A pick in the U17 draft would cost us Pick 15 + Compo pick + Foley potentially . . . are you ok with that?

Tom Gillies from Geelong, rumour is they want a first rounder, our pick 37 wouldn't cut it.
Nicholls from Brissie, not sure what they would want here.
Apparently GWS very keen on Luke Brown for themselves, so would once again cost us something hefty.

The problem is not that we are not trying to get deals like this done, its the fact we dont have the surplus in talent to get these deals done. As we get better through drafting kids, we will have more surplus and can the approach trade week like Hawthorn do.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Loui Tufga on October 12, 2011, 01:26:14 PM
Clarke is no where near the Judd mould :lol If we had made a play for Judd we would have had to give up Pick 2 (Cotchin) pick 18 (Rance) and most likely Jack Lid's! Judd has been great for Carlton but he has had support around him IMO getting Judd would have set us back another 10 years.
 
So what your saying is if we don't get Clarke this trade period then we have failed??

I was asked to provide the names of big name players who have transferred. I did that. Clarke would be a good get IMHO but alas according to our footy department he costs too much lol. A pass mark for me would be:

Tom Gillies from Geelong
Tom Nicholls from Brisbane
Luke Brown from Norwood as a Pre listed Player

A successful trade period that gives real hope for the future means

a pick in the U17 draft
or a big name player from another club.

Lets be honest I havent set the bar very high because Im not expecting us to do much but as always and as I have said, I will apologise on Monday if they produce a big name player.

O.K what are we going to offer to get these deals done?? I can see us having enough currency to get probably one if not two of those deals done. The U17 draft pick would cost us Foley and our first rounder alone,and that might just get us pick 4, is it worth it??

Gillies is contracted and Geelong has stated he is a required player so there goes our Compo pick for an guy who has struggled to break into a side :-\ :-\

That leaves us with peanuts to pick up the rest with and we still don't end up with the one player that we really need in a ruckman......
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: JVT on October 12, 2011, 01:31:36 PM
Clarke is no where near the Judd mould :lol If we had made a play for Judd we would have had to give up Pick 2 (Cotchin) pick 18 (Rance) and most likely Jack Lid's! Judd has been great for Carlton but he has had support around him IMO getting Judd would have set us back another 10 years.
 
So what your saying is if we don't get Clarke this trade period then we have failed??

I was asked to provide the names of big name players who have transferred. I did that. Clarke would be a good get IMHO but alas according to our footy department he costs too much lol. A pass mark for me would be:

Tom Gillies from Geelong
Tom Nicholls from Brisbane
Luke Brown from Norwood as a Pre listed Player

A successful trade period that gives real hope for the future means

a pick in the U17 draft
or a big name player from another club.

Lets be honest I havent set the bar very high because Im not expecting us to do much but as always and as I have said, I will apologise on Monday if they produce a big name player.

O.K what are we going to offer to get these deals done?? I can see us having enough currency to get probably one if not two of those deals done. The U17 draft pick would cost us Foley and our first rounder alone,and that might just get us pick 4, is it worth it??

Gillies is contracted and Geelong has stated he is a required player so there goes our Compo pick for an guy who has struggled to break into a side :-\ :-\

That leaves us with peanuts to pick up the rest with and we still don't end up with the one player that we really need in a ruckman......
Agreed, as I posted above, we couldn't get all these done as we dont have the surplus in players that clubs want / draft picks to make it happen.

I wonder how many supporters would praise the club as opposed to bash them if they got rid of Foley + Pick 15 (and potentially more) to secure a mini draft pick. That would mean, assuming Maric comes for pick 37, that our first pick in the draft would be #55.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: blaisee on October 12, 2011, 01:32:45 PM
Clarke is no where near the Judd mould :lol If we had made a play for Judd we would have had to give up Pick 2 (Cotchin) pick 18 (Rance) and most likely Jack Lid's! Judd has been great for Carlton but he has had support around him IMO getting Judd would have set us back another 10 years.
 
So what your saying is if we don't get Clarke this trade period then we have failed??

I was asked to provide the names of big name players who have transferred. I did that. Clarke would be a good get IMHO but alas according to our footy department he costs too much lol. A pass mark for me would be:

Tom Gillies from Geelong
Tom Nicholls from BrisbaneLuke Brown from Norwood as a Pre listed Player

A successful trade period that gives real hope for the future means

a pick in the U17 draft
or a big name player from another club.

Lets be honest I havent set the bar very high because Im not expecting us to do much but as always and as I have said, I will apologise on Monday if they produce a big name player.

tom nichols from brisbane? you idiot
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: gerkin greg on October 12, 2011, 01:34:01 PM
The reality is no clubs pull in the big names in trade week.

Sorry Gerks but some big names have transferred to other clubs during trade weeks over the years.

Sorry Ramps but some big names being transferred to one or two clubs once in a blue moon means nearly all clubs, nearly every single year, fail to land a big fish.

FACT  ;D
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: 10 FLAGS on October 12, 2011, 01:58:22 PM
Clarke is no where near the Judd mould :lol If we had made a play for Judd we would have had to give up Pick 2 (Cotchin) pick 18 (Rance) and most likely Jack Lid's! Judd has been great for Carlton but he has had support around him IMO getting Judd would have set us back another 10 years.
 
So what your saying is if we don't get Clarke this trade period then we have failed??

I was asked to provide the names of big name players who have transferred. I did that. Clarke would be a good get IMHO but alas according to our footy department he costs too much lol. A pass mark for me would be:

Tom Gillies from Geelong
Tom Nicholls from BrisbaneLuke Brown from Norwood as a Pre listed Player

A successful trade period that gives real hope for the future means

a pick in the U17 draft
or a big name player from another club.

Lets be honest I havent set the bar very high because Im not expecting us to do much but as always and as I have said, I will apologise on Monday if they produce a big name player.

tom nichols from brisbane? you idiot

I made an error in haste when writing my post, compared to some of your work, my work is genius. Your just someone who refuses to admit that his been wrong for years and continually goes down the same old road- the road to nowhere.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Loui Tufga on October 12, 2011, 02:15:27 PM
I made an error in haste when writing my post, compared to some of your work, my work is genius. Your just someone who refuses to admit that his been wrong for years and continually goes down the same old road- the road to nowhere.

There you go again with the insults...........You never answer the questions fired at you and when it all gets to hard you just shoot back with insults :wallywink :wallywink :wallywink

Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: blaisee on October 12, 2011, 02:17:00 PM
Clarke is no where near the Judd mould :lol If we had made a play for Judd we would have had to give up Pick 2 (Cotchin) pick 18 (Rance) and most likely Jack Lid's! Judd has been great for Carlton but he has had support around him IMO getting Judd would have set us back another 10 years.
 
So what your saying is if we don't get Clarke this trade period then we have failed??

I was asked to provide the names of big name players who have transferred. I did that. Clarke would be a good get IMHO but alas according to our footy department he costs too much lol. A pass mark for me would be:

Tom Gillies from Geelong
Tom Nicholls from BrisbaneLuke Brown from Norwood as a Pre listed Player

A successful trade period that gives real hope for the future means

a pick in the U17 draft
or a big name player from another club.

Lets be honest I havent set the bar very high because Im not expecting us to do much but as always and as I have said, I will apologise on Monday if they produce a big name player.

tom nichols from brisbane? you idiot

I made an error in haste when writing my post, compared to some of your work, my work is genius. Your just someone who refuses to admit that his been wrong for years and continually goes down the same old road- the road to nowhere.

yeah, you are an intellectual giant

You want us to trade for Mitch Clarke, the only problem is that he wants to go home to Perth and last time I checked Richmond was in Victoria   :wallywink
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: 10 FLAGS on October 12, 2011, 02:28:25 PM
I made an error in haste when writing my post, compared to some of your work, my work is genius. Your just someone who refuses to admit that his been wrong for years and continually goes down the same old road- the road to nowhere.

There you go again with the insults...........You never answer the questions fired at you and when it all gets to hard you just shoot back with insults :wallywink :wallywink :wallywink

Sorry Tassie but you lucked out again. No insults anywhere.  ;)
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: 10 FLAGS on October 12, 2011, 02:31:32 PM
Clarke is no where near the Judd mould :lol If we had made a play for Judd we would have had to give up Pick 2 (Cotchin) pick 18 (Rance) and most likely Jack Lid's! Judd has been great for Carlton but he has had support around him IMO getting Judd would have set us back another 10 years.
 
So what your saying is if we don't get Clarke this trade period then we have failed??

I was asked to provide the names of big name players who have transferred. I did that. Clarke would be a good get IMHO but alas according to our footy department he costs too much lol. A pass mark for me would be:

Tom Gillies from Geelong
Tom Nicholls from BrisbaneLuke Brown from Norwood as a Pre listed Player

A successful trade period that gives real hope for the future means

a pick in the U17 draft
or a big name player from another club.

Lets be honest I havent set the bar very high because Im not expecting us to do much but as always and as I have said, I will apologise on Monday if they produce a big name player.

tom nichols from brisbane? you idiot

I made an error in haste when writing my post, compared to some of your work, my work is genius. Your just someone who refuses to admit that his been wrong for years and continually goes down the same old road- the road to nowhere.

yeah, you are an intellectual giant

You want us to trade for Mitch Clarke, the only problem is that he wants to go home to Perth and last time I checked Richmond was in Victoria   :wallywink

I gave a list that you all demanded. A pass = Gillies, Nicholls and Brown. A successful trading period = an u17pick or a big name player.

Now I know your on the hop and your looking to save face Blaisee but seriously just come out and admit that youve been wrong for years, year in year out for years and everyone can move on.  ;D
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: gerkin greg on October 12, 2011, 02:40:34 PM
I miss Jordie. Ripper bloke.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Coach on October 12, 2011, 02:43:00 PM
wasn't valued high enough here.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: blaisee on October 12, 2011, 02:50:39 PM
Clarke is no where near the Judd mould :lol If we had made a play for Judd we would have had to give up Pick 2 (Cotchin) pick 18 (Rance) and most likely Jack Lid's! Judd has been great for Carlton but he has had support around him IMO getting Judd would have set us back another 10 years.
 
So what your saying is if we don't get Clarke this trade period then we have failed??

I was asked to provide the names of big name players who have transferred. I did that. Clarke would be a good get IMHO but alas according to our footy department he costs too much lol. A pass mark for me would be:

Tom Gillies from Geelong
Tom Nicholls from BrisbaneLuke Brown from Norwood as a Pre listed Player

A successful trade period that gives real hope for the future means

a pick in the U17 draft
or a big name player from another club.

Lets be honest I havent set the bar very high because Im not expecting us to do much but as always and as I have said, I will apologise on Monday if they produce a big name player.

tom nichols from brisbane? you idiot

I made an error in haste when writing my post, compared to some of your work, my work is genius. Your just someone who refuses to admit that his been wrong for years and continually goes down the same old road- the road to nowhere.

yeah, you are an intellectual giant

You want us to trade for Mitch Clarke, the only problem is that he wants to go home to Perth and last time I checked Richmond was in Victoria   :wallywink

I gave a list that you all demanded. A pass = Gillies, Nicholls and Brown. A successful trading period = an u17pick or a big name player.

Now I know your on the hop and your looking to save face Blaisee but seriously just come out and admit that youve been wrong for years, year in year out for years and everyone can move on.  ;D

funny you are the sad case that obsessed with me pulling up my posts from 4 years ago to support an argument that you dont even know how to argue

Its flattering and all but really get a life

If we leave it up to you we will get Clarke who wants a trade to western Australia, Nicholss from brisbane when he plays for the suns and Giilles who is contracted for another year.

Is it still school holidays or what?

Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: 10 FLAGS on October 12, 2011, 03:17:16 PM
Clarke is no where near the Judd mould :lol If we had made a play for Judd we would have had to give up Pick 2 (Cotchin) pick 18 (Rance) and most likely Jack Lid's! Judd has been great for Carlton but he has had support around him IMO getting Judd would have set us back another 10 years.
 
So what your saying is if we don't get Clarke this trade period then we have failed??

I was asked to provide the names of big name players who have transferred. I did that. Clarke would be a good get IMHO but alas according to our footy department he costs too much lol. A pass mark for me would be:

Tom Gillies from Geelong
Tom Nicholls from BrisbaneLuke Brown from Norwood as a Pre listed Player

A successful trade period that gives real hope for the future means

a pick in the U17 draft
or a big name player from another club.

Lets be honest I havent set the bar very high because Im not expecting us to do much but as always and as I have said, I will apologise on Monday if they produce a big name player.

tom nichols from brisbane? you idiot

I made an error in haste when writing my post, compared to some of your work, my work is genius. Your just someone who refuses to admit that his been wrong for years and continually goes down the same old road- the road to nowhere.

yeah, you are an intellectual giant

You want us to trade for Mitch Clarke, the only problem is that he wants to go home to Perth and last time I checked Richmond was in Victoria   :wallywink

I gave a list that you all demanded. A pass = Gillies, Nicholls and Brown. A successful trading period = an u17pick or a big name player.

Now I know your on the hop and your looking to save face Blaisee but seriously just come out and admit that youve been wrong for years, year in year out for years and everyone can move on.  ;D

funny you are the sad case that obsessed with me pulling up my posts from 4 years ago to support an argument that you dont even know how to argue

Its flattering and all but really get a life

If we leave it up to you we will get Clarke who wants a trade to western Australia, Nicholss from brisbane when he plays for the suns and Giilles who is contracted for another year.

Is it still school holidays or what?

 :lol Ive argued my case and proven my point beyond any doubt. Its your own words about the so called elites in various threads that has burnt your credibility. Just admit your wrong.

And by the way this year your responses are exactly the same as previous years. Defending the indefensible. Simply Unbelievable.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Tigermonk on October 12, 2011, 03:20:22 PM
Delete this thread ADMIN, McMahon is long finished & this thread should never rise from the ashes again
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: 10 FLAGS on October 12, 2011, 03:21:56 PM
Delete this thread ADMIN, McMahon is long finished & this thread should never rise from the ashes again

No No No Monkey. This thread is a classic. Its hilarious.  :lol
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Tigermonk on October 12, 2011, 03:29:45 PM
l never want to see the name McMahon on this forum again. it haunts me  ::)
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: gerkin greg on October 12, 2011, 04:29:19 PM
Greg Miller is the name that haunts me, not McMahon.

Jordie is a legend. Average player, but the dud trade and over the odds contract was not his making. Poor eff has to carry a can full of Miller's dung around for the rest of his life.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: gerkin greg on October 12, 2011, 04:33:27 PM
Also if Miller had accepted Port's offer that year of pick 28 for Schulz that could have been on-traded to the Dogs and we would have kept pick 19 and Scott Selwood. But he stuffed that up as well.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Penelope on October 12, 2011, 05:45:53 PM
l never want to see the name McMahon on this forum again. it haunts me  ::)
:lol
It's like Herpes. Disappears for as while the pain goes and you forget about it, but then it keeps coming back to haunt you.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Dubstep Dookie on October 12, 2011, 07:01:27 PM
wasn't valued high enough here.

The bloke could genuinely play. He had run, and an under rated left boot.

Not like your edwards, jacksons and your Farmers  :banghead
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Dubstep Dookie on October 12, 2011, 07:03:27 PM
l never want to see the name McMahon on this forum again. it haunts me  ::)
:lol
It's like Herpes. Disappears for as while the pain goes and you forget about it, but then it keeps coming back to haunt you.

One may argue it was worth it  :angel:
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Francois Jackson on October 12, 2011, 08:27:22 PM
wasn't valued high enough here.

The bloke could genuinely play. He had run, and an under rated left boot.

Not like your edwards, jacksons and your Farmers  :banghead

give me a spell. Could play..LMFAO

yeah could tackle like a little boy. Rubbish footballer

Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Jackstar is back again on October 12, 2011, 08:43:54 PM
Anyway - for once, try and do the right thing and just admit where we are at as a club and stop defending the indefensible.

In you opinion Exactly where do you think were at as a club??

A hell of a long way from winning a flag. A hell of long way away if we dont get some more A grade talent into the club.

 :lol :lol :lol :lol So after two seasons of seeing the Club trying to do something about it you ready to give up??

Mate every Richmond administration over the last 3 decades has promised to do something about it. This one is breaking there balls to bring Ivan Maric to Punt Road  :lol

Ivan Maric is overated full stop
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Jackstar is back again on October 12, 2011, 08:46:26 PM
As for Jordan.
The year leading up to drafting him, Terry wanted to tag him each time we played Western Bulldogs.
In Terrys words, he ''was the architect "" of there set ups.
I shook my head in disbelief :banghead
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Smokey on October 12, 2011, 08:53:37 PM
wasn't valued high enough here.

Jordie and Beefcake are like 2 peas in a pod.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: one-eyed on October 12, 2011, 09:43:25 PM
Snip! Leave out the insults ppl!  ::)
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Jackstar is back again on October 12, 2011, 09:58:21 PM
Well I posted something of a serious conversation and clowns turn it in to a slagging match
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: The Big Richo on October 16, 2011, 12:31:43 PM
I agree McMahon was a good player who was well worth the trade and money he got.

He wasn't the hardest player going around but you can't have 22 blokes all fighting for the footy.

Never got a fair chance in my eyes.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Chuck17 on October 16, 2011, 12:36:26 PM
I agree McMahon was a good player who was well worth the trade and money he got.

He wasn't the hardest player going around but you can't have 22 blokes all fighting for the footy.

Never got a fair chance in my eyes.

Yep absolute gun never got the kudo's he deserved for winning us that melbourne game
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Francois Jackson on October 16, 2011, 12:37:39 PM
I agree McMahon was a good player who was well worth the trade and money he got.

He wasn't the hardest player going around but you can't have 22 blokes all fighting for the footy.

Never got a fair chance in my eyes.

you been on the sauce again pal?

Mcmahon was the biggest spud to ever be traded to our club.

Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: one-eyed on October 16, 2011, 10:05:26 PM
Jordie was runner-up in Glenelg's B&F this year.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Danog on October 16, 2011, 11:04:29 PM
I agree McMahon was a good player who was well worth the trade and money he got.

He wasn't the hardest player going around but you can't have 22 blokes all fighting for the footy.

Never got a fair chance in my eyes.

you been on the sauce again pal?

Mcmahon was the biggest spud to ever be traded to our club.
Farmer
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: gerkin greg on October 17, 2011, 08:50:53 AM
Jordie was runner-up in Glenelg's B&F this year.

Good on him. He had 6-7 standout games this year.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Owl on October 17, 2011, 08:58:16 AM
McMahon was a hard bastard, harder than a coffin nail, but some people just couldn't see it because they were too busy screaming insults.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Coach on October 17, 2011, 09:17:01 AM
those meds are turning you into a effing idiot owl.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: The Big Richo on October 30, 2011, 11:08:26 PM
That seems a little inappropriate to me.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: WA Tiger on October 31, 2011, 12:24:20 AM
those meds are turning you into a effing idiot owl.

Cmon Davey no need for this sort of talk..........remember. :thumbsup
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Coach on October 31, 2011, 12:34:05 AM
;D

Love you all.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: one-eyed on April 14, 2023, 12:07:41 AM
The man whose one kick after the siren delivered us Dusty ;D was at Richmond training yesterday.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ftl2SKjaQAAgD8t?format=jpg&name=small) (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ftl2SKaagAAiZC4?format=jpg&name=medium)
https://twitter.com/Richmond_FC/status/1646477230040813570
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Assange Tiger 😎 on April 14, 2023, 12:09:17 AM
Great to see. Should honestly be a life member for that goal
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: the claw on April 14, 2023, 04:46:16 PM
Lol are people suggesting old fine eyes would have taken Scully or trengove in front of him.
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: lamington on April 14, 2023, 05:26:23 PM
Not just Jordy but also Tambling’s goal assist deserves praise in this great chapter of Richmond folklore
Title: Re: Jordan McMahon
Post by: Andyy on April 14, 2023, 05:28:11 PM
Lol are people suggesting old fine eyes would have taken Scully or trengove in front of him.

Everybody probably would have. They were very highly rated. Hence Jordys legacy