General > General Discussion

Wikileaks/Assange [merged]

(1/15) > >>

FNM:
Good - bad - indifferent - dangerous - we have a right to know?
What's your opinion?

I personally have a bet each way on good and but, but think they're treading on dangerous ground.

Their latest caper:

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/world/wikileaks-set-to-release-250000-documents/story-e6frf7lf-1225962494119

SPYING by the US on UN officials and sustained calls of Arab leaders to launch an attack on Iran are among the main revelations in the latest Wikileaks document release.
 The US State Department has a damage limitation exercise underway after the release of some 250,000 cables which reveal secret diplomatic backroom plans and frank assessments of world leaders.

One of the most damaging is a directive issued in Hillary Clinton’s name to US diplomats, ordering forensic details collected on top UN officials, including the secretary-general, Ban Ki-Moon, seeking their passwords and other means of access to their private communications networks.

Another cable quotes a source as saying China’s top political leaders ordered the hacking attacks on Google’s network there, and that it was carried out by government IT experts along with what the New York Times calls "internet outlaws" who have been attacking the online systems of companies from America and other countries since 2002.

Start of sidebar. Skip to end of sidebar.
Related CoverageWikiLeaks website 'under cyber attack'
Herald Sun, 2 hours ago
Wikileaks release set as US rejects talks
Herald Sun, 3 hours ago
US rejects talks with WikiLeaks
The Australian, 7 hours ago
US in spin over new Wikileaks files
Herald Sun, 18 hours ago
Canberra on alert for WikiLeaks
Perth Now, 2 days ago.End of sidebar. Return to start of sidebar.
The documents also contain an allegation of "inappropriate behaviour" by a member of the British royal family.

Australia has not featured in the documents released so far, although Mrs Clinton raised the leak with Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd in a phone call last week.

Tensions with Iran are likely to run high this week, with the cables revealing leaders of other countries in the Middle East urging the US to launch an airstrike to debilitate the rogue nation’s nuclear program.

Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah repeatedly calls in one cable for the US to "cut the head off the snake" and stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.

As was the case with two previous major document releases by Wikileaks, the website provided advance access to a number of media organisations including The New York Times and Britain’s Guardian newspaper ahead of their release, officially scheduled for 8.30am AEDT.

The New York Times reports that the "anticipated disclosure of the cables is already sending shudders through the diplomatic establishment, and could conceivably strain relations with some countries, influencing international affairs in ways that are impossible to predict".

The White House has condemned Wikileaks’ decision to release the files, calling it "dangerous and reckless action".

"By releasing stolen and classified documents, WikiLeaks has put at risk not only the cause of human rights but also the lives and work of these individuals," the White House said.


mightytiges:

--- Quote from: FNM on November 29, 2010, 07:51:15 AM ---Good - bad - indifferent - dangerous - we have a right to know?

--- End quote ---
All of the above depending on what is being leaked. You wouldn't want any military plans leaked that put our soldiers lives at risk. Leaking what Arab leaders think of Iran is dangerous as the Iranian leader is up there with the North Koreans in the loopy stakes and he will use this as propaganda to remain in power :help.

tiger101:
will Arab leaders trust USA with as much now they know whatever they say can be leaked in the future which would possibly strength there enemies. example Iran's leader will use this as propaganda to remain in power and invest more in military and nuclear bombs as FNM has already pointed out.

cub:
Heading for big trouble - heard it here first. :shh

wayne:

--- Quote from: CUB on December 03, 2010, 03:44:48 PM ---Heading for big trouble - heard it here first. :shh

--- End quote ---

Julian?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

Go to full version