General > Forum Announcements and Feedback

Split from Clarko thread

<< < (2/2)

(•))(©™:
I'm not fussed no it's been explained.

Doesn't mean I agree with the method Tho

WilliamPowell:

--- Quote from: Dookie on February 03, 2017, 06:55:26 PM ---

Ill say this - with respect, if you delete one more thing which falls inside the site rules and which is factual, without amending site rules on posting, then youll have a mutiny.

If theres captains calls on appropriateness which sit outside the rules, post the parameters. How do we know where the line is if you dont know?

Your choice. Please. Be clear with what you expect and communicate like an adult instead of being under prepared and reactive.

Really dissapointing.

--- End quote ---

Suggest you have a read of the 3 strikes policy thread. In particular the bit about crude comments. Think it's pretty clear

Crude comments are not on, that's why the posts were removed. When they go as low as to degrade genders then it isn't a captains call as you put it. It is following what was laid out under the 2 strikes policy

So instead of whacking me, why don't you whack others who took a fair measured post and used it to post degrading comments.

The only thing that I concede was a captain's call was removing Ox's post. But based on the other posts that used it to create gutter talk and where the discussion was heading I removed it

🏅Dooks:

--- Quote from: WilliamPowell on February 03, 2017, 09:48:19 PM ---
--- Quote from: Dookie on February 03, 2017, 06:55:26 PM ---

Ill say this - with respect, if you delete one more thing which falls inside the site rules and which is factual, without amending site rules on posting, then youll have a mutiny.

If theres captains calls on appropriateness which sit outside the rules, post the parameters. How do we know where the line is if you dont know?

Your choice. Please. Be clear with what you expect and communicate like an adult instead of being under prepared and reactive.

Really dissapointing.

--- End quote ---

Suggest you have a read of the 3 strikes policy thread. In particular the bit about crude comments. Think it's pretty clear

Crude comments are not on, that's why the posts were removed. When they go as low as to degrade genders then it isn't a captains call as you put it. It is following what was laid out under the 2 strikes policy

So instead of whacking me, why don't you whack others who took a fair measured post and used it to post degrading comments.

The only thing that I concede was a captain's call was removing Ox's post. But based on the other posts that used it to create gutter talk and where the discussion was heading I removed it

--- End quote ---

Your original post didnt explain or differentiate as this most recent post.

I cant whack what i havent read - ive assumed (perhaps incorrectly) that what i have indeed read was unnesseceraly censored.

I trust each gender is treated with equal levels of responsibility and sensitivity. 

I accept your version in good faith.

Sorry, transparency and open communication is important.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page