Author Topic: Which player could we least afford to lose?  (Read 700 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95131
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Which player could we least afford to lose?
« on: December 27, 2017, 12:45:19 AM »
A question asked on the AFL website:

IT'S NO secret that to win a flag you need to have a lot of things go right, but having your best players fit and healthy is perhaps the most important.

But which player at your club can you least afford to lose?


http://www.afl.com.au/news/2017-12-25/fan-survey-the-players-your-club-cant-afford-to-lose

Online MintOnLamb

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3379
  • You have to think anyway, so why not think big? DT
Re: Which player could we least afford to lose?
« Reply #1 on: December 27, 2017, 05:19:57 AM »
I go with Trent, he really led by example, his toughness, work ethic and leadership were exemplary this year.
« Last Edit: December 27, 2017, 07:44:34 AM by MintOnLamb »

Online Damo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3740
  • Member of famed “Gang Of Four”. Ground the airbus!
Re: Which player could we least afford to lose?
« Reply #2 on: December 27, 2017, 06:13:04 AM »
Nank

The backup options aren’t any good

Offline Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7504
Re: Which player could we least afford to lose?
« Reply #3 on: December 27, 2017, 09:29:22 AM »
Nank

The backup options aren’t any good

Agreed. I'd also have Jack in there for the same reasons.
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.