Football > Richmond Rant

Drafting tall this year.

(1/5) > >>

evaluator:
With Hall, Gaspar, Kingsley, Bowden, P, gone it should mean 4 blokes drafted 194-196cm, with the potential to play forward and back. And with Knobel and Graham gone it should mean 2-3 blokes over 200cm.  :thumbsup  ;D

not including trades.  ;)

Mopsy:
Why would Graham be gone?

tigersalive:

--- Quote from: Mopsy on June 28, 2007, 09:23:58 AM ---Why would Graham be gone?

--- End quote ---
You can only stay on a list as a rookie for 2 years, then you have to be delisted.

So I think he'll be gone, then re-listed as a rookie again anyway.  :rollin

jezza:
Only problem with that theory is that this draft is supposedly pretty ordinary for KPPs. Rucks we should be able to go a long way to building a long-term ruck division that we've lacked for so long. But talls, there just don't seem to be that many, at least not stand-outs. What talls we get will more likely be later round selections.

What would be nice would be to see another tall on the rookie list. IMO our rookie list should always have:

1 ruckman
1 inside midfielder (ala Foley)
1 KPP (preferably a defender)

and with whatever spots are left Terry can have his athletic flankers or whatever else he desires.

{X}:
dont think the draft will be a huge emphisis this yr

we have a very young  list as it is, we will draft no doubt, but i have a feeling we will trade hard at yrs end and try and add quality and experience to our list

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page