One-Eyed Richmond Forum

General => General Discussion => Topic started by: one-eyed on March 22, 2016, 09:49:16 PM

Title: Terrorist attacks
Post by: one-eyed on March 22, 2016, 09:49:16 PM
‘23 people killed’ and 30 injured in Brussels attacks

BRUSSELS has been rocked by multiple explosions at the airport and at least two metro stations.

(http://www.smh.com.au/cqstatic/gnovca/23brussels_web.jpg)

http://www.theage.com.au/world/brussels-airport-blast-several-injured-after-multiple-explosions-rock-belgian-capital-20160322-gnos8q.html
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/world/blasts-rock-brussels-airport-metro-stations/news-story/0ad810d6afad903239307c60873c309d

Title: Re: Terrorist attacks on Brussels
Post by: Stalin on March 23, 2016, 08:18:32 AM
Why get rid of my pos

Soft 

What about western values Wp?

Dare I say u are letting the terrorists win
Title: Re: Terrorist attacks on Brussels
Post by: WilliamPowell on March 23, 2016, 10:00:10 AM
Why get rid of my pos

Soft 

What about western values Wp?

Dare I say u are letting the terrorists win

Firstly i didn't remove anything

So ihave no idea what you are on about,  which is common

But it was probably totally irrelevant to a very sad topic
Title: Re: Terrorist attacks on Brussels
Post by: one-eyed on March 23, 2016, 11:25:18 AM
But it was probably totally irrelevant to a very sad topic
This.
Title: Re: Terrorist attacks on Brussels
Post by: Stalin on April 06, 2016, 08:20:43 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CfTUbjEUMAE6KIj.jpg)
Title: Re: Terrorist attacks on Brussels
Post by: Francois Jackson on April 07, 2016, 07:59:57 AM
Why get rid of my pos

Soft 

What about western values Wp?

Dare I say u are letting the terrorists win

Firstly i didn't remove anything

So ihave no idea what you are on about,  which is common

But it was probably totally irrelevant to a very sad topic

ooh dear
Title: Re: Terrorist attacks on Brussels
Post by: Stalin on April 07, 2016, 08:09:40 AM
You are too,  Mohammad
Title: Re: Terrorist attacks on Brussels
Post by: tony_montana on April 07, 2016, 11:16:36 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CfTUbjEUMAE6KIj.jpg)

pretty obvious I wouldve thought Mr conspiracy theorist.

They have pretty stringentresidency laws, they keep a close watch on all arabs living in Israel, and dont need much to throw them in the slamnmer and throw away the key
Title: Re: Terrorist attacks on Brussels
Post by: Stalin on June 15, 2016, 07:56:59 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CfTUbjEUMAE6KIj.jpg)

pretty obvious I wouldve thought Mr conspiracy theorist.

They have pretty stringentresidency laws, they keep a close watch on all arabs living in Israel, and dont need much to throw them in the slamnmer and throw away the key

The new one in states is false flag as well
Title: Re: Terrorist attacks on Brussels
Post by: Stalin on July 17, 2016, 06:21:40 PM
Where do IS get money and weapons from ?
Title: Re: Terrorist attacks on Brussels
Post by: (•))(©™ on July 17, 2016, 06:25:20 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CfTUbjEUMAE6KIj.jpg)

pretty obvious I wouldve thought Mr conspiracy theorist.

They have pretty stringentresidency laws, they keep a close watch on all arabs living in Israel, and dont need much to throw them in the slamnmer and throw away the key

And ISIS are happy to just let it go...
Title: Re: Terrorist attacks on Brussels
Post by: 🏅Dooks on July 17, 2016, 06:30:00 PM
Why would ISIS attack Europe over Israel?

What is their endgame?
Title: Re: Terrorist attacks on Brussels
Post by: Stalin on July 17, 2016, 07:04:50 PM
---> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2857816/Israel-vents-fury-France-parliament-votes-recognise-Palestine-state.html

Whoops
Title: Re: Terrorist attacks on Brussels
Post by: tony_montana on July 17, 2016, 09:25:54 PM
Why would ISIS attack Europe over Israel?

What is their endgame?

Its gone viral
Title: Re: Terrorist attacks on Brussels
Post by: tony_montana on July 17, 2016, 09:27:15 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CfTUbjEUMAE6KIj.jpg)

pretty obvious I wouldve thought Mr conspiracy theorist.

They have pretty stringentresidency laws, they keep a close watch on all arabs living in Israel, and dont need much to throw them in the slamnmer and throw away the key

And ISIS are happy to just let it go...

the moment they get the opportunity im sure theyll jump at it.
Title: Re: Terrorist attacks on Brussels
Post by: Francois Jackson on July 17, 2016, 09:53:33 PM
WHY have jihadist terrorists made France Europe’s bloodiest battlefield?
Andrew Bolt in the HUN

Simple answer: Because France let in the most Muslims.

This link between immigration policies and terrorism largely explains why the French are the greatest victims of Europe’s jihadists.

It also explains why we are fools not to change our own immigration policies to protect ourselves.

No European Union country has a higher proportion of Muslims than France — up to 10 per cent of its population, or six million people, though statistics are vague, and vary.

Yes, numbers don’t tell the whole story, but they do count.

Another example: Belgium’s capital, Brussels, is Europe’s biggest Islamic city, with 300,000 Muslims, and has paid terribly for it.

It suffered mass murder by jihadists at its airport last March, its police have had two shootouts with terrorist networks, and an Islamist murdered four Jews at its Jewish museum. But it is France where the fiercest frontline runs in this war between Islam and the remnants of European Christendom.

France has the most Muslims, and that is why four people were killed, three of them children, in an Islamist attack on a Jewish day school in Toulouse four years ago.

That is why 20 people were murdered in Paris in last year’s Islamist attacks on the Charlie Hebdo magazine and a kosher supermarket.


The Nice terrorist truck driver Mohamed Lahouaiej-Bouhlel.
That is why 130 more people were murdered in Paris last November in an Islamic State assault on restaurants, a concert hall and a football stadium.

That is why a policeman and his wife were last month murdered by a jihadist outside their home.

That is why 84 people died in last week’s terrorist attack in Nice, when a Tunisian-born man rammed his truck into a crowd celebrating Bastille Day.

That is why there have been dozens of other Islamist attacks and plots, including the beheading last year of a factory manager at Saint-Quentin-Fallavier, and the running down of 21 people by cars driven by jihadists in two attacks the previous year.

This slaughter has forced the French Government to turn parts of France into what looks like a military occupation: 10,000 soldiers have been deployed in the streets, and the country has been under an official state of emergency for eight months now.

“We are in a war,” declared Nicolas Sarkozy, the former French president.

True, the number of Muslims in a country does not tell the full story.

Indeed, by some counts Germany may have even more Muslims than France, after an estimated 600,000 more crossed into the country illegally last year — though Muslims do still make up a smaller proportion of Germany’s bigger population.

Yet, Germany has until now been spared the mass murders suffered by so many other countries. Perhaps this is because many of its Muslims have come from Turkey, a country that is more Westernised and advanced than the North African countries which fed France.

Rescuers evacuate victims near the Bataclan concert hall in Paris last November.
But many of the Muslims who crossed into Germany last year did come from North Africa. Germany’s Justice Ministry said this month it was conducting nearly 120 investigations involving more than 180 terrorism suspects.

Nearly 500 suspected extremists are being monitored.

So for Germany, too, more Muslims means more danger, whereas the situation in, let’s say, Japan, suggests fewer Muslims means less danger.

Japan has strict controls on immigration and its 127 million people include just 100,000 Muslims. Result: zero Islamist attacks.

Contrast that with Australia, which has a population of just 24 million, but 500,000 Muslims. How we’ve paid for leaving our door open.

For a start, the past three successful terror attacks here — the Lindt café siege, the shooting of police accountant Curtis Cheng, and the stabbing of two police in Melbourne — were all carried out by Muslim refugees we had allowed in.

That story is now terribly familiar. For instance, IS’s most influential recruiter in Australia, Mohammad Ali Baryalei, was another Muslim refugee we took in.

Harun Causevic, put under a control order by a Melbourne court last week to prevent terrorism, is from yet another Muslim refugee family.

On it goes. The Islamists jailed for plotting an attack on Sydney’s Holsworthy army base included refugees and men from Muslim immigrant families.

Many of the jailed Benbrika plotters were born overseas. Hate preacher Sheik Taj Din al-Hilali was born in Egypt.

The Jew-hating Sheik Ismael al-Wahwah, head of the radical Hizb ut Tahrir movement in Australia, was born in Jordan.


A police operation in Brussels after the airport attack in March.
Hamdi Alqudsi, found guilty this month by a Sydney court of recruiting jihadists for IS, is a disability pensioner born in Palestine.

In fact, of the 21 men already jailed in Australia for terrorism, 12 were born overseas. Seven more were born here to Lebanese families.

Who let them all in? Why?

How can our politicians excuse running such a dangerous refugee and immigration program?

How can they have imported such trouble that at least two Australian journalists have been forced to move homes after being threatened with death for mocking Islam or reporting on IS?

No person should have to live in such fear in this country. No one should have to risk death for simply speaking their mind — and risk it, worse, at the hands of extremists we actually invited in.

Of course, most Muslims are great citizens and some are widely admired. They hate terrorism. They want peace. All that is true and must always be kept in mind.

But most are troublingly silent when their top Muslim leaders preach hatred, excuse terrorists and blame the West for inviting jihadist attacks.

They even allow our Grand Mufti, Dr Ibrahim Abu Mohammed, to speak in their name when he lists as the “causative factors” of IS’s murder last year of 130 people in Paris not the Islamic faith which inspired the killers, but five alleged anti-Muslim sins of the West, from our “racism” and “Islamophobia” to our foreign policies.

It is much the same story with our most prominent Muslims — including presenters such as The Project’s Waleed Aly — who turn almost every discussion on Islamic terrorism into a criticism of the West.

Take Aly’s explanation when the Islamist son of Afghan immigrants last month killed 49 people at a gay bar in Orlando.

To Aly, this actually showed that our “freedom just kind of ends up consuming itself in a very strange, dark sort of a way”.

It seemed that to Aly the problem was the West’s freedom, not the Islamist hatred of it.

But the time for such sophistry is long gone. The luxury of such vaporous debates is now beyond our capacity to pay. The mathematics is clear: The more Muslims we import, the more danger we are in.

Isn’t the next step now obvious? What will our Prime Minister and Immigration Minister do now to protect us?
Title: Re: Terrorist attacks on Brussels
Post by: mightytiges on July 18, 2016, 04:00:32 AM
Bolt showing he's a simpleton again with his simplistic anti-immigration dog whistling.

Conveniently, Bolt leaves out that all the terrorists that have attacked France in recent times have come from French speaking former French colonies in Africa. French is also an official language of Belgium. There's anti-colonial resentment that is entwined with Islam extremism that doesn't exist elsewhere. France is also still very active in its former African colonies including targeting Islamic extremist groups.

It's no real surprise either that since ISIS has been on the military backfoot and lost a large number of fighters on the ground and half the territory in Syria/Iraq it once held, that it's resorted more and more back to terrorist attacks against soft (civilian) targets and desperately hoping for brainwashed lone-wolfs to carry them out.

Title: Re: Terrorist attacks on Brussels
Post by: 🏅Dooks on July 18, 2016, 06:43:28 AM
Hate almost never defeats hate. How many young muslims would be in danger of being radicalised if there was a ban on muslim immigration?

The only thing that can beat hate is love. 
Title: Re: Terrorist attacks on Brussels
Post by: Stalin on July 18, 2016, 11:12:43 AM
Bolt is good for Saffie slave ownership related topics much else



Hate almost never defeats hate. How many young muslims would be in danger of being radicalised if there was a ban on muslim immigration?

The only thing that can beat hate is love.


That. And , It'd be nice if the seppos stopped giving them sick modified Texas made hardware
Title: Re: Terrorist attacks on Brussels
Post by: Stalin on July 18, 2016, 07:35:38 PM
Why would ISIS attack Europe over Israel?

What is their endgame?

Gen 15: 18


the same day the LORD made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrate
Title: Re: Terrorist attacks
Post by: mightytiges on July 24, 2016, 04:33:14 AM
80 dead and 230 injured in Kabul terrorist attack. ISIS getting more desperate and trying to create a sectarian divide in Afghanistan by targeting Shia Muslims.
Title: Re: Terrorist attacks
Post by: Chuck17 on July 24, 2016, 09:22:00 AM
There isn't and won't be any terrorists attacks in Japan
Title: Re: Terrorist attacks
Post by: Stalin on July 24, 2016, 09:59:53 AM
Cause they banned the jesuits?
Title: Re: Terrorist attacks
Post by: Chuck17 on July 24, 2016, 08:04:55 PM
Banned Islam to a large degree
Title: Re: Terrorist attacks
Post by: Stalin on July 24, 2016, 08:24:05 PM
Refugees too
Title: Re: Terrorist attacks
Post by: Francois Jackson on July 24, 2016, 08:25:38 PM
Refugees too

like the UAE right?
Title: Re: Terrorist attacks
Post by: Diocletian on July 24, 2016, 08:45:58 PM
Islam is not banned....Japan is monocultural (discounting the indigenous Ainu people of Hokkaido) and has never allowed immigration on anything more than a negligible scale.
Title: Re: Terrorist attacks
Post by: Chuck17 on July 24, 2016, 10:00:11 PM
Teaching of Islam is forbidden in Japan
Muslims cannot be citizens of Japan
Title: Re: Terrorist attacks
Post by: Stalin on July 24, 2016, 10:17:28 PM
Champions of human rights the japs
Title: Re: Terrorist attacks
Post by: 🏅Dooks on July 25, 2016, 06:10:24 PM
Champions of human rights the japs

All mammals rights. Very proud of their sparkling whale free seas.

Hows their homeland environmental record?