One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: one-eyed on July 13, 2017, 06:20:06 PM

Title: Richmond has the equal 4th best midfield: Champion Data
Post by: one-eyed on July 13, 2017, 06:20:06 PM
Here it is - the updated Champion Data midfield rankings for season 2017.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DEmJXnCVYAA6GPx.jpg)
https://twitter.com/TheRunHome/status/885389851649908736

https://www.sen.com.au/news/2017/07/13/pies-tumble-dees-soar-in-updated-midfield-rankings/
Title: Re: Richmond has the equal 4th best midfield: Champion Data
Post by: Tigeritis™©® on July 13, 2017, 10:46:46 PM
I dunno about their rating system. I think it's flawed.

Title: Re: Richmond has the equal 4th best midfield: Champion Data
Post by: MintOnLamb on July 14, 2017, 07:38:20 AM
And we were 3 last year!!

If we had Miles in, maybe we would be 3 again?

51% of people agree statistics can be manipulated to prove most things are incorrect 49% of the time
Title: Re: Richmond has the equal 4th best midfield: Champion Data
Post by: wayne on July 14, 2017, 08:31:02 AM
I dunno about their rating system. I think it's flawed.

At the start of the year the Pies were ranked 1
Title: Re: Richmond has the equal 4th best midfield: Champion Data
Post by: tony_montana on July 14, 2017, 12:13:22 PM
I dunno about their rating system. I think it's flawed.

I question a lot of the way CD measure their stats and efficiency.

I've said it before and I'll say it again, the definition for disposal efficiency is the biggest load of bullocks and absolutely gives an erroneous view. If a player kicks it long(over 30metres) to a 1 on 3 contest it should not be classified as an efficient kick. If someone kicks it into space for a teammate to run onto that should not be classified as an inefficient kick, or if some dufus teammate drops an easy mark and the ball gets turned over, itshould not be classified as an inefficient kick. If a player like Bellis kicks it short 20 metres sideways or backwards, when someone was on 45 down the ground is it efficient? Its flawed. Dusty goes for line splitting passes that sometimes dont come off so we have a situation where plebs with nfi question his skill bc his disposal efficiency is at 65% vs some hack defender who passes it sideway and has a rating of 80%+

Like in soccer, they talk about pass completion rates like its an important stat, so you have limited footballers who just go sideways and backwards with a 90%+ completion rate as opposed to the suarez/Messi types who continue to go for the outrageous defence splitting passes but dont always pull it off, then you have couch experts arguing that player x is the best on the planet bc he hits 5-10 metres passes all day long.