One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: one-eyed on May 31, 2009, 06:45:37 AM

Title: Luke McGuane cops a reprimand over the Peake incident
Post by: one-eyed on May 31, 2009, 06:45:37 AM

Do you think any Tiger is in trouble with the Match Review Panel over the alleged "contact" with Peake behind the play?

Ch 10 were pointing the finger at Polo but the vision wasn't that clear to tell  ???.

Title: Re: The Peake incident?
Post by: Infamy on May 31, 2009, 09:32:53 AM

Vision on the tv was certainly inconclusive, however they may find more
I thought it may have been Cousins on first view, he was getting a bit fired up at times also
If it was Polo then as they said on the tv, hopefully he can blame the head knock :)

Title: Re: The Peake incident?
Post by: TigerTime on May 31, 2009, 10:01:32 AM

peake is a softie

it was polo, but it was accidental contact lol, polo had his eye on the ball and peake was not in his sight and came from a blind spot lol

good on polo he is a hard nut just like jackson, we need more

Title: Re: The Peake incident?
Post by: wayne on May 31, 2009, 10:04:36 AM

I thought it was McGuane.

Title: Re: The Peake incident?
Post by: Jackstar is back on May 31, 2009, 12:12:52 PM

Polo, think he might in strife
Sad as he actually played excellent in the 3rd quarter

Title: Re: The Peake incident?
Post by: Chuck17 on May 31, 2009, 02:16:39 PM

Shame if he gets rubbed out.

Played a great game and is having quiet a good season.

Title: Luke McGuane cops a reprimand from the MRP
Post by: one-eyed on June 01, 2009, 05:49:30 PM

Luke McGuane, Richmond, has been charged with a Level Two striking offence against Brett Peake, Fremantle, during the second quarter of the Round 10 match between Richmond and Fremantle, played at Subiaco on Saturday May 30, 2009.

In summary, he can accept a reprimand and 93.75 points towards his future record with an early plea.

The incident was assessed as intentional conduct (three points), low impact (one point) and body contact (one point). This is a total of five activation points, resulting in a classification of a Level Two offence, drawing 125 demerit points and a one-match sanction. He has no existing good or bad record. An early plea reduces the sanction by 25 per cent to a reprimand and 93.75 points towards his future record.


Contact between Richmond’s Ben Cousins and Fremantle’s Byron Schammer from the fourth quarter of Saturday’s game was assessed. The panel said that due to the insufficient video evidence available, no further action would be taken.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/78021/default.aspx

Title: Re: Luke McGuane cops a reprimand over the Peake incident
Post by: wayne on June 01, 2009, 08:44:18 PM

Is that the grainy off the ball footage, or the fair bump in general play??

Title: Re: Luke McGuane cops a reprimand over the Peake incident
Post by: one-eyed on June 02, 2009, 02:23:22 PM

Luke has accepted the reprimand.

Title: Re: Luke McGuane cops a reprimand over the Peake incident
Post by: Tigermonk on June 02, 2009, 03:07:38 PM

l thought it was Polo as well  :lol

Title: Re: Luke McGuane cops a reprimand over the Peake incident
Post by: Chuck17 on June 02, 2009, 03:11:32 PM

Onya Lukey good to see a tiger with a bit of Grrrrrr

Title: Re: Luke McGuane cops a reprimand over the Peake incident
Post by: TigerTime on June 02, 2009, 03:19:36 PM

did luke take the fall for polo, i thought it was polo, anyway should have contested it, footage could not prove who it was , just proved that peake is a weak idiot, he fell and sooked at least twice, the first one was a definate legitimate shirt front from mguane where peake fell and squirmed like he was shot in the chest, so mguane must have gone for seconds and make sure of it lol