Author Topic: Biggest sooky little babies?  (Read 195726 times)

Online Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8893
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #795 on: May 16, 2021, 09:49:29 AM »
I figured there would be whinging about that goal.

Was clearly a goal IMO.

Umpire couldn't get any closer unless he was chewing the ball.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95385
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #796 on: May 16, 2021, 05:41:05 PM »
Barrett and Cornes this morning on the Sunday Footy Show were sooking about Grimes not being penalised for that one-on-one contest with Toby Greene in the last minute.

Watch here: https://twitter.com/FootyonNine/status/1393720644160864257

When Lloyd replied that Greene wasn't watching the ball, Barrett tried to backtrack and say "oh some umpires would pay that a free against Grimes"  :wallywink.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95385
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #797 on: May 17, 2021, 03:25:52 AM »
Quote from: X-man
I’ll say it before and I’ll say it again. Richmond are the luckiest side in the history of the game.
https://twitter.com/XTweeptweep01/status/1393538911578693634

Quote from: Jack
Breaking: Umps on pay role @ Richmond
Quote from: Jack
GWS vs Umps
Quote from: Jack
The Arc is a joke, no way was that a goal
Quote from: Jack
The Arc is a joke, they go to an umpires call when the umpire got fkin knocked over lmao. Pathetic
Quote from: Jack
Umps get Home in a Classic*
Quote from: Jack
Umps won you another game, what’s new
Quote from: Jack
Why exactly did the Arc go to the umpires call when they have clear footage of it being a non goal, while the umpire got tackled? Obviously rigged in favour of Richmond
Quote from: Jack
Umpires tonight handing Richmond the 4 points


https://twitter.com/kyriegoatving

Quote from: Brad
The ARC needs a serious review. There is no way a goal line decision like that should end in an umpires call.
#AFLTigersGiants
https://twitter.com/Bradcmelb/status/1393541833305640967

Quote from: goyougoodthing
Did Richmond win the flag tonight? The carry on is a bit much yeah? An injury depleted GWS that’s been going pretty ordinary had their measure most of the night and should’ve won. Terrible winners #AFLTigersGiants
https://twitter.com/Cadders3/status/1393555138455896065

Quote from: King Toby
I’ll fight any Richmond supporter that claims they didn’t get extremely lucky tonight #AFLTigersGiants
Quote from: King Toby
We've been robbed
Quote from: King Toby
One of his ‘goals’ was from the front row of the crowd, but that’s cool.
https://twitter.com/dlesk18

Quote from: Neil Stewart
Hardwick is steadily forging a reputation as the least respected triple premiership coach of all time.

His team has been gifted SO MANY advantages, yet he still wants more. Completely detached from reality.
Quote from: Neil Stewart
AFL: In the interests of equalization, we must enforce the soft cap so the big clubs don’t gain an unfair advantage

Also AFL: Hey Richmond, here’s your fixture with eighteen MCG games
https://twitter.com/NeilStewartWC

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17812
  • Proud Gang of Four member #albomustgo
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #798 on: May 17, 2021, 11:25:26 PM »
Meth pipe's running hot in Portaderlaid tonight...



 :shh




"Tradition is not the worship of ashes, but the preservation of fire." 

- Gustav Mahler


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95385
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #799 on: May 18, 2021, 07:29:08 AM »
Like father like son ...

Quote from: Graham Cornes
Sounds a touch precious Dimma. How much more of an advantage would you like?
https://twitter.com/Cornesy12/status/1393767947768786949

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Of course poor ol' obsessed Neil couldn't help himself either  :wallywink.

Quote from: Neil Stewart
Finally, everyone is suddenly noticing the precious, petty and pathetic comments and conduct of Gale and Hardwick.

AFL HQ needs to put its foot down IMMEDIATELY.
https://twitter.com/NeilStewartWC/status/1394282098127605762

Offline lamington

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2800
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #800 on: May 18, 2021, 10:44:49 AM »
Meth pipe's running hot in Portaderlaid tonight...



 :shh

I guess he was asleep during the 2020 GF

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95385
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #801 on: May 19, 2021, 05:49:26 AM »
Quote from: Wally Fradus
Richmond have had home ground advantages too good for too long. Spare a thought for Geelong who have been reamed in recent years, especially WRT finals.
Quote from: Anthony whellum
Life wasn't meant to be easy Dimmer.
Every AFL coach should be preaching to their side.
"Anytime, Anywhere"
Success has gone to Richmond's heads.
They were much more likeable when they were ordinary.
Quote from: Andrew
All of their barracker’s (not supporters) will jump off again when they start to lose games. The microwave sales will also go through the roof!
Quote from: John O'Donoghue
Kornes is right.Tiges are whingers and sooks.
In 2019 Tiges played their last 14 games including the Grand Final at the MCG.
Does that seem fair?
Quote from: Jimmy Mac
100%! So bloody precious. WA clubs travelling every second weekend and poor Dimma can’t handle going to the docklands. Such whingers!
https://twitter.com/FOXFOOTY/status/1394397370046058496


Quote from: The RealJarJar
#afltigersgiants Giants deserved to win that. Tigers looking absolutely crap this year
https://twitter.com/TheRealJarJar2/status/1393540133266198531

Quote from: TheRealJarJar


2 simpletons and a cup. Enjoy your mediocrity
https://twitter.com/TheRealJarJar2/status/1393572818512535559

Quote from: The RealJarJar
No worries. We’ve had 3 of those ourselves (with far superior teams) & sustained success since the mid 80s. Good luck catching up
https://twitter.com/TheRealJarJar2/status/1393563669305315331

Offline wayne

  • Fame of Hall
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8409
  • In Absentia
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #802 on: May 19, 2021, 09:55:52 AM »
I'm guessing RealJarJar is a Borethorn supporter.

They better be ready for some pain, we've won 3 of the last 4, have better kids than the Hawks, and have 6 good picks in this draft.
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do

Offline Tiger Khosh

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3717
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #803 on: May 19, 2021, 12:48:41 PM »
I thought he was talking about the cats as hawks have won 5 in AFL era but then the cats wernt successful in the 80s  :huh

Offline wayne

  • Fame of Hall
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8409
  • In Absentia
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #804 on: May 19, 2021, 02:59:38 PM »
You might be right

EDIT: yep, a Cats fan
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95385
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #805 on: May 20, 2021, 05:48:50 AM »
Quote from: J.Stewart
A goal that should have been a point as went over the line. Dusty gives it away with his “poo that was lucky” smirk. When is the AFL going to stop protecting their favourites :facepalm.
Quote from: J.Stewart
Nah that was a behind for any other player Martin on the other hand
Quote from: J.Stewart
UR WRONG!!! Ur a 1 👁 Tiger & don’t C AFL neutral, I do Tiger. He even mouthed 2 his own “I don’t know if it was”. No change 2 ball direction from his quick kick over the line. I was there. The most protected AFL player in history with this, his high fend off, throws & holding the ball
Quote from: J.Stewart
Watch all of it buddy and it’s a point  :rollin but AFL most protected player in history can only get away with it  ;)
https://twitter.com/DSteward12345/status/1394919692649725953


Quote from: Matt Bottrell
Add to this the biased umpiring in the last 15 minutes of that game and it wasn’t something I wanted to watch. Richmond always get a good run when it matters in games.
Quote from: Lee
Only about four years too late ::)
Quote from: The Weekend Blues
Maybe if Lynch and Riewoldt didn’t stage so often they would get more free kicks
Quote from: SB
Shows the continual weakness of Jack to work hard to get a hard ball. Leaves it up to others to do the hard work! No respect!
Quote from: NewEra Bombers
Then they’re defenders blatantly dive when receiving little to no contact.......but you never report on that
Quote from: Matthew Passmore
Typical of Richmond
Quote from: Anthony
Tom Lynch again. What were we expecting from a thug.
Quote from: LeeLCats
::) AFL’s pampered child just doing their normal thing ...so what is daddy AFL going to do or say now? Nothing?
Quote from: Dave Kelland
Lynch Fined again!! .. didn’t he get fined the most times last year? Bloke needs a seat to actually learn..
Quote from: Damien Simic
Somehow Richmond fans will use the victim card here
Quote from: brodielindrea
how has fox footy just realised richmond are dirty. these man been doin it for 4 years now.
Quote from: Steve Roberts
Forward thugs, pathological Jack and antisocial Tom, fed by a 1% club thug Dusty and coached by the thug with a smile Harddick. When you lose your edge you resort to thuggery, just ask another world champion thug ear biter and rapist Iron Mike
Quote from: jake
Bunch of cheats. Cant wait for Mitch Robinson to show them what real aggression looks like on Friday night instead of throwing out cheap shots like big tough guy Lynch
https://twitter.com/FOXFOOTY/status/1394974231033692161

Offline lamington

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2800
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #806 on: May 20, 2021, 12:35:50 PM »
My favourite is that last comment from Jake. Lol at Mitch Robinson being the embodiment of real hardness

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95385
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #807 on: May 20, 2021, 02:04:38 PM »
Quote from: REALLY
Why does this not get the media attention and response that it deserves.

This is downright ridiculous, sort of tactics you expect in a dirty streetfight, not a professional sport.

Please comment, share, post and shame the mongrels until it causes change.

GWS should take the thugs to court, and also be given the win that was stolen off them
Quote from: Saint
Dirty thugs as usual
Quote from: Chuckachan
The tigers need to play a cleaner brand of footy, otherwise they will further the stereotype that they’re a team of thugs.
Quote from: Anna
Lynch is a thug he should have got 1 match for that unnecessary bump, lucky that kid didn’t have concussion otherwise Lynch would have 4 weeks on the sidelines!
https://www.theroar.com.au/afl/video/thats-overs-tigers-under-fire-for-really-poor-off-ball-hits-on-young-giant-1128054/

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13136
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #808 on: May 20, 2021, 03:21:10 PM »


Quote from: Chuckachan
The tigers need to play a cleaner brand of footy, otherwise they will further the stereotype that they’re a team of thugs.

My chinese brother

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17812
  • Proud Gang of Four member #albomustgo
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #809 on: May 20, 2021, 03:31:15 PM »
  :lol :shh


CGAF if everyone thinks we're thugs (and honestly CGAF if we are) - better than when they all thought we were soft -at the end of the day a club's job is to endear itself to it's own fanbase and impress them not the entire AFL fanbase... :shh
"Tradition is not the worship of ashes, but the preservation of fire." 

- Gustav Mahler


FJ is the only one that makes sense.