Author Topic: Liam Baker [merged]  (Read 112639 times)

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19126
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Liam Baker [merged]
« Reply #540 on: April 30, 2024, 11:21:29 PM »
Big Footy's self-proclaimed insider Tiger "two calls right in 12 years" 71 reckons he's staying....so make of that what you will.... :shh
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9736
Re: Liam Baker [merged]
« Reply #541 on: May 01, 2024, 12:15:05 AM »
Rightly or wrongly, I’d feel very very hard done by, by bakes if he left via the preseason draft.

I just can’t see him leaving without securing a trade back for us.

I firmly believe 100% that he would not go by the PSD.

If CCJ wouldn't do it there's no way Bakes would.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 97381
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Liam Baker [merged]
« Reply #542 on: May 01, 2024, 07:18:25 AM »
'I think Richmond fans should get their head around life without Liam Baker."

@RalphyHeraldSun reveals the most likely landing point.

Watch here: https://twitter.com/FOXFOOTY/status/1785243949478678826

----------------------

Liam Baker is towards the top of the priority list for West Australian clubs, with @RalphyHeraldSun revealing the price it would cost to secure the Tigers’ vice-captain in a trade.

https://twitter.com/codeaflau/status/1785255292273598544

Online Knighter

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2717
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Liam Baker [merged]
« Reply #543 on: May 01, 2024, 07:56:08 AM »
Ralph malf clueless as usual. baker is going to Freo

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13936
Re: Liam Baker [merged]
« Reply #544 on: May 01, 2024, 09:10:31 AM »
Ralph has nfi and that other loser "later in the second round is about as funny as it gets.

There is no way on this planet that baker is only worth a late first, or early second. Its around the 10 mark and that is absolutely fair. I just hope he chooses freo.

If its eagles then you hope Clarke shows some loyalty and gets us a fair deal.



Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9736
Re: Liam Baker [merged]
« Reply #545 on: May 01, 2024, 10:09:00 AM »
Dunno if he's worth pick 10 myself but definitely not as late as 20 odd.

For me he's around those mid-teens but really we should be packaging something back to target a top 8 pick.

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13936
Re: Liam Baker [merged]
« Reply #546 on: May 01, 2024, 10:13:40 AM »
Agree with the packaging part, but I couldn't disagree more with the rest. Mid teens will end up being pick 20.

That's crazy talk when I watch treloar, hopper and Schulz roll around.

Pick 10-14 any day of the week. Straight out 12 is fair value.
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9736
Re: Liam Baker [merged]
« Reply #547 on: May 01, 2024, 10:16:56 AM »
Agree with the packaging part, but I couldn't disagree more with the rest. Mid teens will end up being pick 20.

That's crazy talk when I watch treloar, hopper and Schulz roll around.

Pick 10-14 any day of the week. Straight out 12 is fair value.

Yeah that's what I mean - pick should end up mid teens.

Not 15 sliding to 18.

If it was 10-12 sliding to 13-15 I'd say that's about right.

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13936
Re: Liam Baker [merged]
« Reply #548 on: May 01, 2024, 10:40:53 AM »
Agree with the packaging part, but I couldn't disagree more with the rest. Mid teens will end up being pick 20.

That's crazy talk when I watch treloar, hopper and Schulz roll around.

Pick 10-14 any day of the week. Straight out 12 is fair value.

Yeah that's what I mean - pick should end up mid teens.

Not 15 sliding to 18.

If it was 10-12 sliding to 13-15 I'd say that's about right.

fair enough then. Still think its slightly unders.

Treloar was pick 14 and a future second rounder. The Bulldogs sent pick No.14 and a future second-round selection to the Magpies in exchange for Treloar, also receiving picks No.26, No.33 and No.42 in return.

Not sure what that ended up being but its close 10 isnt it?

That is one example. Many more.
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline Simonator

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2856
Re: Liam Baker [merged]
« Reply #549 on: May 01, 2024, 01:03:03 PM »
Will never blame a player for wanting to go home. He’s been a great tiger and what great return we should receive on Baker

Offline yandb

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 744
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Liam Baker [merged]
« Reply #550 on: May 01, 2024, 01:11:59 PM »
Treloar was a salary dump so no comparison. he would have been a pick around 4 or 5 otherwise.

Offline georgies31

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3912
Re: Liam Baker [merged]
« Reply #551 on: May 01, 2024, 01:15:00 PM »
Pick 8 to 14 anything else forget about it. Wouldn't package nothing up 2 time premiership player in his prime and one of our best. Eagles payed 2 first rounds for Kelly and Miles behind Baker.

Offline Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9736
Re: Liam Baker [merged]
« Reply #552 on: May 01, 2024, 01:21:13 PM »
Agree with the packaging part, but I couldn't disagree more with the rest. Mid teens will end up being pick 20.

That's crazy talk when I watch treloar, hopper and Schulz roll around.

Pick 10-14 any day of the week. Straight out 12 is fair value.

Yeah that's what I mean - pick should end up mid teens.

Not 15 sliding to 18.

If it was 10-12 sliding to 13-15 I'd say that's about right.

fair enough then. Still think its slightly unders.

Treloar was pick 14 and a future second rounder. The Bulldogs sent pick No.14 and a future second-round selection to the Magpies in exchange for Treloar, also receiving picks No.26, No.33 and No.42 in return.

Not sure what that ended up being but its close 10 isnt it?

That is one example. Many more.

Their 2nd rounder in 2021 ended up being pick 32.

Once you do the math Collingwood essentially paid 58 points (pick 69) for WB to take treloar off their hands.

Edit: Collingwood paid $1.5mil of Treloar's 5 year contract at WB and saved themselves $3mil over the same period, or $600k/year.

So they traded out minimal draft value for $600k/year.

Offline Simonator

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2856
Re: Liam Baker [merged]
« Reply #553 on: May 01, 2024, 01:49:26 PM »
Pick 8 to 14 anything else forget about it. Wouldn't package nothing up 2 time premiership player in his prime and one of our best. Eagles payed 2 first rounds for Kelly and Miles behind Baker.

I love baker as much as the next guy , but that’s a pretty one eyed take. Kelly nearly won a Brownlow, was in way better form than baker is now.
Also the fact he’s a 2 time premiership player doesn’t mean a great deal. What would we have gotten for Castagna with your logic ?

I think he’s worth a top 15 pick. Wouldn’t be surprised if we got a top 20 and a future second or something

Offline Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7944
Re: Liam Baker [merged]
« Reply #554 on: May 01, 2024, 01:51:13 PM »
Thank god some of you aren’t doing trade week  ;D.
Seriously, we have 2-3 clubs who want him, all have top 10 picks in this years draft.
Admittedly, Freo really need to finish in that 7-12 zone to encourage them to do something stupid but they have West who HAVE to be seen as doing something.
He is a huge pick up as an on field leader - both WA clubs and Crows screaming out for this quality.

These factors lift his currency beyond just what he offers as a player. If we can’t get something inside top 10 as a minimum and probably more then we just aren’t doing our job.

Trades are rarely just about the players playing worth.
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.