One-Eyed Richmond Forum
Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: TigerLand on July 14, 2010, 07:19:52 PM
-
Sadly I cant see him playing AFL again to try and get a spot on the list. Can he be re-rookied next year?
Disappointing his last AFL game was against Port when we won and was dropped simply to make way for Simmonds goodbye. I still disagree this should have happened when it did.
On one hand I hope he gets another crack but another thinks there isn't much point seeing as he probably isn't apart of our future plans. I do hope he gets 1 more game so he goes out on normal terms instead of a stepping aside for a circus parade.
-
6th oldest player on the list and first year kpp have gone past him
-
not at Richmond in 2011.
:)
-
Really needs to pick up form at Coburg. Bump to the head came at a really bad time for him. Unfortunately definitely at the crossroads.
-
Polak will be delisted.
Polak, McMahon, Morton, Rance, Hislop, Simmonds.Thomson
there is 7 changes at least for end of year.
Polo ?????
-
Polak will be delisted.
Polak, McMahon, Morton, Rance, Hislop, Simmonds.
there is 6 changes at least for end of year.
Polo ?????
Polo & Thomson will go before Hislop & Rance
-
Why will Rance be delisted, I wouldn't think he would have any currency.
Would would you get rid of a young kid for pick 100 or so.
-
Unfortunately for Polly his AFL career is over. There's no sentiment in footy. It can be a cruel game at times. Even before the tram accident his footy future wasn't certain as a fringe player.
Polak will be delisted.
Polak, McMahon, Morton, Rance, Hislop, Simmonds.Thomson
there is 7 changes at least for end of year.
Polo ?????
IMO we'll keep hold of Rance. Even Morton could survive with still 7 weeks to go. Gourdis and Polo added to Jordie, Polak, Hislop, Simmo and Thomson. Roberts is another who may go if he doesn't return. So possibly 8 changes.
-
Why will Rance be delisted, I wouldn't think he would have any currency.
Would would you get rid of a young kid for pick 100 or so.
because he cant get a game, thats why.
Our back 6 is very settled,
So settled that Mcgaune mighten get a game this week either.
Then you have guys like Post who will play either end
-
Why will Rance be delisted, I wouldn't think he would have any currency.
Would would you get rid of a young kid for pick 100 or so.
because he cant get a game, thats why.
Our back 6 is very settled,
So settled that Mcgaune mighten get a game this week either.
Then you have guys like Post who will play either end
Sometimes you need players on your list for depth though too!
-
I still think Rance is good for another year. Many worse players than him on the list.
-
I would think that the fact that Rance is CONTRACTED for 2011 is a good enough reason to say he will not be de-listed
He can be traded but will he be? Doubt it
-
I would think that the fact that Rance is CONTRACTED for 2011 is a good enough reason to say he will not be de-listed
He can be traded but will he be? Doubt it
Agree is certainly a squad player and the next 30 games will determine whether he fits into our best 22.
I personally think he can.
-
I would think that the fact that Rance is CONTRACTED for 2011 is a good enough reason to say he will not be de-listed
He can be traded but will he be? Doubt it
Traded
-
I would be happy to trade Rance, goes hard at it but his disposal is so dodgy
-
I would think any player out of contract would be up for trade before those under contract
-
Its a shame for Polak, I'm still dirty on the club for the Simmonds circus, anyway.
Agree with all that Polak is probably finished.
Delist:
Simmonds, Polak, McMahon, Thompson all delisted.
Maybe Delist:
Hislop, King (playing well)
Trade Table:
Morton
Rance
Polo
Maybe Trade Table:
Jackson
Other than that I don't think there will be any other big changes to the list. Maybe Cousins but I hope he stays.
-
I think the other thing that needs to be considered is what are they planning ot do with the rookies
Are they going to promote any or just re-rookie them
Then, the ones that go up for trade, if they don't get traded what do you with them then? Keep or just de-list
So many questions ;D
-
Its a shame for Polak, I'm still dirty on the club for the Simmonds circus, anyway.
Agree with all that Polak is probably finished.
Delist:
Simmonds, Polak, McMahon, Thompson all delisted.
Maybe Delist:
Hislop, King (playing well)
Trade Table:
Morton
Rance
Polo
Maybe Trade Table:
Jackson
Other than that I don't think there will be any other big changes to the list. Maybe Cousins but I hope he stays.
add Roberts to that list also
King does not deserve to be traded if this form holds up. His biggest tets will come in the next few weeks.
Another brain fade against the Pies goodbye
Since the Saints game where he played on NDS he has played out of his skin most weeks.
I would entertain a trade for Tambling before anyone as your Polo and Rance types are worthless out there.
-
I doubt Hislop will be delisted....wasnt he asked by the club to go have his operation to clean up his hip/knee back in june.
Why would the club ask a player to go be operated on in June if it plans to delist him?
-
I doubt Hislop will be delisted....wasnt he asked by the club to go have his operation to clean up his hip/knee back in june.
Why would the club ask a player to go be operated on in June if it plans to delist him?
Kickbacks :cheers
-
Then, the ones that go up for trade, if they don't get traded what do you with them then? Keep or just de-list
As long as who we offer for trade is not publicised by the club or the player.
I do NOT want to see a similar public show like with Tuck last year, embarassing for all concerned.
-
Hasn't hurt his form this year, a few others may benefit for the same
-
Polak wont survive the cut, Rance may survive 1) because hes still a kid and 2) hes a decent and honest kid according to those who know, and its always good to have those types of players around the place, unless of course he wants to go back to WA and we are interested in a victorian kid who wants to come home! Polaks mid 20s now suffered horrendous injuries in the tram incident. RFC looked after him but we have key backs who are just as good or better. I hope he sticks around in some capacity but it shouldnt be on RFCs senior list.
-
Hasn't hurt his form this year, a few others may benefit for the same
What?
And you judge others for their posting.
-
Polak wont survive the cut, Rance may survive 1) because hes still a kid and 2) hes a decent and honest kid according to those who know, and its always good to have those types of players around the place, unless of course he wants to go back to WA and we are interested in a victorian kid who wants to come home! Polaks mid 20s now suffered horrendous injuries in the tram incident. RFC looked after him but we have key backs who are just as good or better. I hope he sticks around in some capacity but it shouldnt be on RFCs senior list.
Good post Ramps