One-Eyed Richmond Forum

General => General Discussion => Topic started by: mightytiges on March 01, 2005, 05:00:54 AM

Title: Oscars
Post by: mightytiges on March 01, 2005, 05:00:54 AM: Does anyone know of anyone who watches the whole 4 hours or however long the Oscars are? :help You normally hear who has won during the day anyhow! If I do watch any of it it's flicking on the tele for the last 20 mins when the main awards are handed out.

A female friend of mine mentioned the same type of actress predictably seems to win now - Blanchett, Paltrow, Kidman, Berry.

Congrats to Cate Blanchett on her award as well as not making an overdramatic and long acceptance speech.
Title: Re: Oscars
Post by: the_boy_jake on March 01, 2005, 07:17:01 AM: MT,

Can we please move this discussion to the 'B-grade actors' thread (with any mention of the excellent morgan freeman excepted).

Thanks,

j
Title: Re: Oscars
Post by: cub on March 01, 2005, 07:38:56 AM: Total time watching oscars = 0 - Care factor -1 :sleep
Title: Re: Oscars
Post by: froars on March 01, 2005, 07:45:39 AM: I didn't see it.
I'm a Desperate Housewives fan lol and then i watched Denton interview Fred and Mary!
Title: Re: Oscars
Post by: cub on March 01, 2005, 08:29:45 AM: Now there's something funny - I actually watched about 20 mins of Denton with Fred and Mary - Really strange for me as I am so not into all that stuff but they came accross as quite down to earth people.
Title: Re: Oscars
Post by: froars on March 01, 2005, 08:41:57 AM: Denton does great interviews.
Mary came across as being more royal than Fred lol
Title: Re: Oscars
Post by: julzqld on March 01, 2005, 08:59:05 AM: Good interview and Denton was the best person to do it. Imagine if Rove had done it - what the?

As for the Oscars, I only cared that Cate won. Chris Rock as the MC was enough to put me off. And the new format of presenting awards as people's seats - what the?
Title: Re: Oscars
Post by: Harry on March 01, 2005, 10:26:06 AM: Don't care about the oscars and don't care about the viking royals.

Did I mention that I really don't care?
Title: Re: Oscars
Post by: JohnF on March 01, 2005, 08:52:09 PM: How come all the good actresses like Jenna Jameson, Monica Sweetheart and Anna Nova never win oscars?
Title: Re: Oscars
Post by: Ox on March 01, 2005, 10:46:13 PM: I'd LOVE to give ol' Princess Mary a rodgering.

Total Aussie spunk.

LMAOOO@The Prince going to a small island to find his wife.
Title: Re: Oscars
Post by: Harry on March 02, 2005, 10:35:33 AM: LMAO JohnF. Hollywood never reward pure talent.

LMAO at Ox crowning his jewels.
Title: Re: Oscars
Post by: the_boy_jake on March 02, 2005, 11:46:00 AM: Quote from: Harry Hasselhoff on March 02, 2005, 10:35:33 AM
LMAO JohnF. Hollywood never reward pure talent.

I've got a funny feeling that if they ever did win, the statuette would appear (or dissapear as it were) in their next feature movie :thumbsup
Title: Re: Oscars
Post by: JohnF on March 02, 2005, 08:59:44 PM: Quote from: the_boy_jake on March 02, 2005, 11:46:00 AM
Quote from: Harry Hasselhoff on March 02, 2005, 10:35:33 AM
LMAO JohnF. Hollywood never reward pure talent.

I've got a funny feeling that if they ever did win, the statuette would appear (or dissapear as it were) in their next feature movie :thumbsup

ROFLFLFMAOOOOOOOOOO@an Oscar butt plug
Title: Re: Oscars
Post by: julzqld on March 03, 2005, 08:33:38 AM: Getting back to Princess Mary, she looked lovely at the Red Cross Ball last night.
Title: Re: Oscars
Post by: mightytiges on March 03, 2005, 06:29:11 PM: Quote from: julzqld on March 03, 2005, 08:33:38 AM
Getting back to Princess Mary, she looked lovely at the Red Cross Ball last night.

It's funny how the Danish royals are so popular in Oz and in the media spotlight while with the English ones it's almost a case of don't tell anyone we're here. Not much of a competition in the looks department that's for sure :thumbsup.