One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: one-eyed on May 06, 2012, 02:04:52 AM

Title: Lloyd compares Vickery to Watts and Anthony
Post by: one-eyed on May 06, 2012, 02:04:52 AM
Lloyd in today's Age...

Others struggling to cope due to a lack of strength and competitiveness in the forward 50 are Melbourne's Jack Watts, Richmond's Tyrone Vickery and Fremantle's Jack Anthony. After being subbed off against Carlton, Anthony has been dropped this weekend and may have played his last game for Fremantle, and Melbourne and Richmond are compromising their team structure by having to take Vickery and Watts out of the forward line and invent other roles for them as they have been non-competitive when forward. Watts has also been dropped this weekend and will be in the VFL for a sustained period until he can improve his physical aspects.

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/leading-edge-maybe-not-20120505-1y621.html#ixzz1u0nGRkcL

Missed seeing last week's game Matty?  :huh
Title: Re: Lloyd compares Vickery to Watts and Anthony
Post by: Penelope on May 06, 2012, 06:52:26 AM
When did we compromise our structure and find a different role for vickery rather than the forward/ruck role he has been playing ?

 :huh
Does matty ever have any idea about what he talks about?
Title: Re: Lloyd compares Vickery to Watts and Anthony
Post by: TigerTimeII on May 06, 2012, 09:21:51 AM
what a stuffing idiot
Title: Re: Lloyd compares Vickery to Watts and Anthony
Post by: Hard Roar Tiger on May 06, 2012, 09:35:40 AM
I'd compare Lloydy to Tony Shaw. Despite their inabilty to communicate a simple thought into any kind of insight - they somehow remain employed.
Leeches of the football world because they played for clubs with a large fan base
Title: Re: Lloyd compares Vickery to Watts and Anthony
Post by: gerkin greg on May 06, 2012, 10:01:04 AM
Lloyd is a Limp Sargent
Title: Re: Lloyd compares Vickery to Watts and Anthony
Post by: Phil Mrakov on May 06, 2012, 11:01:35 AM
Lloyd is a grade a tossbag..

Absolutely hates Richmond.
Title: Re: Lloyd compares Vickery to Watts and Anthony
Post by: Phil Mrakov on May 06, 2012, 11:07:58 AM
Just said on the sunday footy show that he thinks the bombers are a top 4 side.

Title: Re: Lloyd compares Vickery to Watts and Anthony
Post by: Tigeritis™©® on May 06, 2012, 01:14:35 PM
Just said on the sunday footy show that he thinks the bombers are a top 4 side.
top four isn't beyond them. Even with suspect players or injuries they have exceeded expectations. What they lack in player depth they make up with sheer determination and a winning belief and a success driven culture. That's already better than what we have at the moment.
Title: Re: Lloyd compares Vickery to Watts and Anthony
Post by: smasha on May 06, 2012, 01:25:41 PM
Full of possum poo Lloyd.

Just hates Richmond with a passion the Veruca Salt player.

Smug bastard wearing a red and black dress.
Title: Re: Lloyd compares Vickery to Watts and Anthony
Post by: Penelope on May 06, 2012, 01:37:55 PM
Just said on the sunday footy show that he thinks the bombers are a top 4 side.
top four isn't beyond them. Even with suspect players or injuries they have exceeded expectations. What they lack in player depth they make up with sheer determination and a winning belief and a success driven culture. That's already better than what we have at the moment.

yet they lost to collingwood after leading with a couple of minutes to go?
Title: Re: Lloyd compares Vickery to Watts and Anthony
Post by: Dubstep Dookie on May 06, 2012, 02:05:00 PM
Pees sitting down does Lloyd
Title: Re: Lloyd compares Vickery to Watts and Anthony
Post by: Phil Mrakov on May 06, 2012, 02:18:54 PM
They have an easy first half draw.. Sure they beat Carlton but I just can't see them having any impact.

They will have a poo second half of the season.

We would have been 4-2 with their draw right now maybe even 5-1.
Title: Re: Lloyd compares Vickery to Watts and Anthony
Post by: Tigeritis™©® on May 06, 2012, 02:22:32 PM
Just said on the sunday footy show that he thinks the bombers are a top 4 side.
top four isn't beyond them. Even with suspect players or injuries they have exceeded expectations. What they lack in player depth they make up with sheer determination and a winning belief and a success driven culture. That's already better than what we have at the moment.

yet they lost to collingwood after leading with a couple of minutes to go?
Yet they sit third on the ladder and thrashed Carlscum. How sweet that would be....   We only dream of beating those cheats.
Winning Culture is the key and very high standards at your club something we haven't got right yet. You think if we had the Anzac game against the pies since '95 we would even have been competative? There's no way.   
Hardwick is doing ok but he and Gale have still a long way to go to change the culture. I reckon it's essential to get losers out ie. Cameron and bring success driven great club people in ie. Balme.
Title: Re: Lloyd compares Vickery to Watts and Anthony
Post by: mightytiges on May 06, 2012, 02:47:17 PM
When did we compromise our structure and find a different role for vickery rather than the forward/ruck role he has been playing ?

 :huh
Does matty ever have any idea about what he talks about?
That would be a no al :yep. Someone needs to remind Matty that Vickery is 200cm and can play forward and ruck.
Title: Re: Lloyd compares Vickery to Watts and Anthony
Post by: Penelope on May 06, 2012, 04:32:47 PM
Just said on the sunday footy show that he thinks the bombers are a top 4 side.
top four isn't beyond them. Even with suspect players or injuries they have exceeded expectations. What they lack in player depth they make up with sheer determination and a winning belief and a success driven culture. That's already better than what we have at the moment.

yet they lost to collingwood after leading with a couple of minutes to go?
Yet they sit third on the ladder and thrashed Carlscum. How sweet that would be....   We only dream of beating those cheats.
Winning Culture is the key and very high standards at your club something we haven't got right yet. You think if we had the Anzac game against the pies since '95 we would even have been competative? There's no way.   
Hardwick is doing ok but he and Gale have still a long way to go to change the culture. I reckon it's essential to get losers out ie. Cameron and bring success driven great club people in ie. Balme.
Perhaps they are just playing better footy at the moment?
but according to you we are a better side and the only reason we have lost to top sides in the last few weeks is because we dont have self belief? never mind that twice we fought back against a very good side who looked like they were going to run away from us, because you dont need self belief to do that?

If we had no self belief we would not have even got close in these games, but you need some idea to understand concepts like that.
Title: Re: Lloyd compares Vickery to Watts and Anthony
Post by: Muscles on May 06, 2012, 05:13:58 PM
Not going well is TV.  Seems keen to avoid the contest.  Is he playing hurt?
Title: Re: Lloyd compares Vickery to Watts and Anthony
Post by: Hellenic Tiger on May 06, 2012, 05:51:12 PM
Thought he showed some good signs last week in getting to the contest and having an appetite for the contest but went backwards again this week.

Is important to structure and will get a game atm regardless until we can get Griffiths or Astbury fit and firing.
Title: Re: Lloyd compares Vickery to Watts and Anthony
Post by: Chuck17 on May 06, 2012, 05:52:33 PM
I compare Lloyd to a turd.
Title: Re: Lloyd compares Vickery to Watts and Anthony
Post by: gerkin greg on May 06, 2012, 06:39:48 PM
Vicks worked to attacking space and was ignored on at least 4 occasions that I counted today

Being ignored by his teammates

Needs bigger hair
Title: Re: Lloyd compares Vickery to Watts and Anthony
Post by: Tigermonk on May 06, 2012, 06:43:32 PM
Not good conditions for the big fella. Would prefer to see him used at FF & moving Rewoldt up the ground to make him work harder instead of sitting at the back waiting for the easy ride.
Title: Re: Lloyd compares Vickery to Watts and Anthony
Post by: Dubstep Dookie on May 06, 2012, 07:54:47 PM
I compare Lloyd to a turd.

The turd wins.
Title: Re: Lloyd compares Vickery to Watts and Anthony
Post by: Coach on May 06, 2012, 10:44:00 PM
Vicks worked to attacking space and was ignored on at least 4 occasions that I counted today

Being ignored by his teammates

Needs bigger hair

Unforgivable pass from Martin early on. Had Vicks by himself 35 out straight in front and what does he do? Kicks it to Riewoldt in the pocket. stuff me. Riewoldt should start clunking them or he should stop stuffing calling for it every time. We kicked it to Richo because he would win nearly every 1-1 he had
Title: Re: Lloyd compares Vickery to Watts and Anthony
Post by: georgies31 on May 06, 2012, 11:17:04 PM
Never says a bad word about the dons.Do I hear Scott Gumbleton anywhere !!!! .
Title: Re: Lloyd compares Vickery to Watts and Anthony
Post by: Loui Tufga on May 06, 2012, 11:18:52 PM
Never says a bad world about the dond .Do I hear Scott Gumbleton anywhere !!!! .

Read back through the thread and you'll read it everywhere :shh
Title: Re: Lloyd compares Vickery to Watts and Anthony
Post by: one-eyed on May 07, 2012, 07:02:35 PM
Lloyd on 3aw called Richmond "irrelevant"  ::).

He started by saying the bottom 7 sides have won just 7 games combined out of a possible 42. They are irrelevant. Healy and Russell then asked "Including Richmond Lloydy?" and Lloyd responded "yes"  ::).

Title: Re: Lloyd compares Vickery to Watts and Anthony
Post by: gerkin greg on May 07, 2012, 07:22:07 PM
Irrelevant? That's a paddling

Played for Essendon? That's a paddling

Harry Highpants? That's a paddling

Dreamtime at the G. That's a paddling
Title: Re: Lloyd compares Vickery to Watts and Anthony
Post by: Hellenic Tiger on May 07, 2012, 07:46:23 PM
Irrelevant? That's a paddling

Played for Essendon? That's a paddling

Harry Highpants? That's a paddling

Dreamtime at the G. That's a paddling

 :lol :rollin :lol


Actually Gerks its

Dreamtime at the G you better believe it that's a paddling.
Title: Re: Lloyd compares Vickery to Watts and Anthony
Post by: Hellenic Tiger on May 07, 2012, 07:47:07 PM
Lloyd on 3aw called Richmond "irrelevant"  ::).

He started by saying the bottom 7 sides have won just 7 games combined out of a possible 42. They are irrelevant. Healy and Russell then asked "Including Richmond Lloydy?" and Lloyd responded "yes"  ::).

Matthew Lloyd is a tossbag. :help
Title: Re: Lloyd compares Vickery to Watts and Anthony
Post by: Ekto on May 07, 2012, 08:25:20 PM
Who is Matthew Lloyd?

Something rings a bell about diving champions but..........

Who is he?
Title: Re: Lloyd compares Vickery to Watts and Anthony
Post by: Phil Mrakov on May 07, 2012, 09:04:10 PM
Lloyd hates us more than Carlton and Collingwood.

stuffen moron.
Title: Re: Lloyd compares Vickery to Watts and Anthony
Post by: Judge Roughneck on May 07, 2012, 09:38:05 PM
Hope he does his hammy jogging to the bar.
Title: Re: Lloyd compares Vickery to Watts and Anthony
Post by: Ekto on May 07, 2012, 10:04:43 PM
 
Quote

Unforgivable pass from Martin early on. Had Vicks by himself 35 out straight in front and what does he do? Kicks it to Riewoldt in the pocket. stuff me. Riewoldt should start clunking them or he should stop stuffing calling for it every time. We kicked it to Richo because he would win nearly every 1-1 he had
Spot on Coach.

Bustin Dustin stuffed this one up.

Do you think he will get dropped for making one decision error?

Nah, he is a top draft pick, too expensive to play at Coburg.

Besides, his neck tattoo might attract too many bikies to see if they can recruit him if he was to be out and about in the public domain at Coburg.