One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: one-eyed on May 13, 2012, 02:45:01 PM

Title: Wallace would now have Vickery at pick 20 in a redone 2008 draft
Post by: one-eyed on May 13, 2012, 02:45:01 PM
Hutchy on his TAC Cup Future Stars show got Plough to redo the 2008 draft based on how things have turned out now.

From memory as they just flashed the names 11-20 on the screen (I may have one or two wrong)...

1. Naitanui
2. Hurley
3. Shuey
4. Yarran
5. Hill
6. Hannebery
7. Zaharakis
8. Sidebottom ...... this was our actual pick
9. Sloane
10. Jackson Trengove
11-16 (not in order): Mitch Robinson, Steven Motlop, Liam Anthony, Ballantyne, Rich, Hartlett
17. Beams ..... too low in Hutchy's opinion
18. Redden
19. Shiels
20. Vickery ..... Plough said if this was done last year Ty would've been higher.
21. Watts
Title: Re: Wallace would now have Vickery at pick 20 in a redone 2008 draft
Post by: WA Tiger on May 13, 2012, 02:50:33 PM
Gee Melbourne really stuffed up with Watts didnt they!

So who instead of Vicks could we of had that is playing better?
Title: Re: Wallace would now have Vickery at pick 20 in a redone 2008 draft
Post by: Coach on May 13, 2012, 03:21:20 PM
Gee Melbourne really stuffed up with Watts didnt they!

So who instead of Vicks could we of had that is playing better?

Pretty much everyone that has ever been drafted is in better form the Vicks. Vickery's teammates don't help him out one bit though. Maybe Vickery breaks team rules by making good leads up the corridor instead of leading to the fence :whistle
Title: Re: Wallace would now have Vickery at pick 20 in a redone 2008 draft
Post by: WA Tiger on May 13, 2012, 03:25:06 PM
Gee Melbourne really stuffed up with Watts didnt they!

So who instead of Vicks could we of had that is playing better?

Pretty much everyone that has ever been drafted is in better form the Vicks. Vickery's teammates don't help him out one bit though. Maybe Vickery breaks team rules by making good leads up the corridor instead of leading to the fence :whistle

 :lol
Title: Re: Wallace would now have Vickery at pick 20 in a redone 2008 draft
Post by: Penelope on May 13, 2012, 03:42:09 PM
hardwick said as much after last weeks game. sat down with the midfielders and highlghted the number of times vickery found space and they ignored him.
Title: Re: Wallace would now have Vickery at pick 20 in a redone 2008 draft
Post by: Coach on May 13, 2012, 03:56:50 PM
big Riewoldt was too hard to ignore  :bow
Title: Re: Wallace would now have Vickery at pick 20 in a redone 2008 draft
Post by: Tigermonk on May 13, 2012, 04:36:51 PM
can we stop with the Wallace leatherskin topics, this guy wrecked our club so l dont see why anyone bothers with what he has to say.
Title: Re: Wallace would now have Vickery at pick 20 in a redone 2008 draft
Post by: Smokey on May 13, 2012, 04:38:50 PM
Gee Melbourne really stuffed up with Watts didnt they!

So who instead of Vicks could we of had that is playing better?

Maybe Vickery breaks team rules by making good leads up the corridor instead of leading to the fence :whistle

Yeah, was a bit of that going on yesterday that didn't impress me one bit.  I think that's the biggest difference I see in Jack's games this year - his reluctance to lead like he means it and wants it.  Too many half-behindd attempts and too intent on getting back to a pack situation for the big speccie.  If he gets back on his bike the goals will flow quite quickly again.
Title: Re: Wallace would now have Vickery at pick 20 in a redone 2008 draft
Post by: Tigermonk on May 13, 2012, 04:43:55 PM
Gee Melbourne really stuffed up with Watts didnt they!

So who instead of Vicks could we of had that is playing better?

Maybe Vickery breaks team rules by making good leads up the corridor instead of leading to the fence :whistle

Yeah, was a bit of that going on yesterday that didn't impress me one bit.  I think that's the biggest difference I see in Jack's games this year - his reluctance to lead like he means it and wants it.  Too many half-behindd attempts and too intent on getting back to a pack situation for the big speccie.  If he gets back on his bike the goals will flow quite quickly again.

Dimma will spit it bigtime soon with this lazy footballer
Title: Re: Wallace would now have Vickery at pick 20 in a redone 2008 draft
Post by: Coach on May 13, 2012, 05:20:10 PM
Gee Melbourne really stuffed up with Watts didnt they!

So who instead of Vicks could we of had that is playing better?

Maybe Vickery breaks team rules by making good leads up the corridor instead of leading to the fence :whistle

Yeah, was a bit of that going on yesterday that didn't impress me one bit.  I think that's the biggest difference I see in Jack's games this year - his reluctance to lead like he means it and wants it.  Too many half-behindd attempts and too intent on getting back to a pack situation for the big speccie.  If he gets back on his bike the goals will flow quite quickly again.

Agree. Almost every time we have it going forward Jack is there pointing his finger in the air. Needs to lead more. Needs to help bring other forwards into the game
Title: Re: Wallace would now have Vickery at pick 20 in a redone 2008 draft
Post by: Hellenic Tiger on May 13, 2012, 08:06:41 PM
Me, Tuckerbag on OER have redone the coaches in waiting draft

1. Malthouse
2. Matthews
3. Roos
4. Rodney Eade
5. Neil Craig
6. Bomber Thompson
7. Chocco Williams
daylight

even more daylight

even more daylight

end of draft

rookie coach draft

daylight

pass

even more daylight

pass

even more daylight

pass

Terry Wallace.



                                                                                                                                                                         
Title: Re: Wallace would now have Vickery at pick 20 in a redone 2008 draft
Post by: gerkin greg on May 13, 2012, 08:24:59 PM
You left out Gary Ayres, another Pass, Peter Rohde, another pass, and a hairy malaka
Title: Re: Wallace would now have Vickery at pick 20 in a redone 2008 draft
Post by: Hellenic Tiger on May 13, 2012, 08:26:49 PM
You left out Gary Ayres, another Pass, Peter Rohde, another pass, and a hairy malaka

Hairy Malaka has never coached an AFL side, only overseen a terrible list and turned it into a diabolical one. Coaching hybrid rules is the equivalent to dancing with your sister.
Title: Re: Wallace would now have Vickery at pick 20 in a redone 2008 draft
Post by: gerkin greg on May 13, 2012, 08:27:26 PM
Yet he's still in front of Wallace
Title: Re: Wallace would now have Vickery at pick 20 in a redone 2008 draft
Post by: Coach on May 13, 2012, 10:36:47 PM
You left out Gary Ayres, another Pass, Peter Rohde, another pass, and a hairy malaka

Pete Rohde was offered an interview in 2009. ;)
Title: Re: Wallace would now have Vickery at pick 20 in a redone 2008 draft
Post by: bojangles17 on May 13, 2012, 10:39:23 PM
Gee Melbourne really stuffed up with Watts didnt they!

So who instead of Vicks could we of had that is playing better?

Pretty much everyone that has ever been drafted is in better form the Vicks. Vickery's teammates don't help him out one bit though. Maybe Vickery breaks team rules by making good leads up the corridor instead of leading to the fence :whistle

lol...spot on CD...how often is JR8 leading to the damn boundary line, fair dinkum, could their possibly be any less daylight bw the posts :lol...and to his teammates bloody ignore the lead