One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => View from the Outer => Topic started by: tdy on July 20, 2012, 07:09:07 PM

Title: Jack Ziebell - Thug or what?
Post by: tdy on July 20, 2012, 07:09:07 PM
Does anybody else think North are a pack of whingers and Jack Ziebell is a thug who did an aerial run through on the carlscum bloke.  I reckon he was lucky to get 4 weeks.

Its been amazing the support for Ziebell "His Eye was on the ball", "Its a man's game"  all the usual rubbish.

His right arm was tucked in, his knee was raised clearly he wasn't only going for the mark.
Title: Re: Jack Ziebell - Thug or what?
Post by: dwaino on July 20, 2012, 07:15:14 PM
Six weeks ago we wouldn't have heard a peep. Ziebell probably wouldn't have even done it. Whenever these nothings string a few wins together, everyone from the club to the players to all 10 supporters come out swinging like they're bigger than the game. Once they lose a few again they'll be back down the ways of irrelevance.
Title: Re: Jack Ziebell - Thug or what?
Post by: Hellenic Tiger on July 20, 2012, 07:20:13 PM
I hate Nought with a passion. A nothing footy club that had no hesitation to give the AFL the med report on Adams but felt aggrieved Carlton gave the AFL Joseph's report.

However if that was a marking contest and Ziebell maks it he is a courageous player.
I honestly thought the kid was hard done by. It was by no means blatant like the Riewoldt one late last year. I thought this was a farce. If Joseph gets up, what happens? No penalty. Accidental. Of course it is.
Rather than looking for players like Judd who bring the game into disrepute Adrian Anderson is the one who should be vilified for bringing the game into disrepute.
Title: Re: Jack Ziebell - Thug or what?
Post by: dwaino on July 20, 2012, 07:32:32 PM

However if that was a marking contest and Ziebell maks it he is a courageous player.
I honestly thought the kid was hard done by. It was by no means blatant like the Riewoldt one late last year. I thought this was a farce. If Joseph gets up, what happens? No penalty. Accidental. Of course it is.

Honestly that was my initial reaction too, Tucker. But then during the week I jumped on Youtube and looked at his hit on Riewoldt in real time, then I looked at his Joseph hit in real time, and then I looked at Wellingham's hit on Simpson in real time. And as dirty as it makes me feel I can understand the AFL's angle. If you impact front on you're asking for trouble. If you leave the ground you're flirting with the devil.

*shrug*
Title: Re: Jack Ziebell - Thug or what?
Post by: tdy on July 20, 2012, 08:19:44 PM
What I don't get is that no one is saying how unrealistic a marking attempt it was.  Which coach teaches players to go for a mark with your good arm tucked in ready for a collision.  The conclusion I make is he wasn't trying to mark it, he was running through the guy on the air.  Seems clear to me it was illegal.
Title: Re: Jack Ziebell - Thug or what?
Post by: Eat_em_Alive on July 20, 2012, 09:13:31 PM
Pack of whingers honestly
Have been listening to them ring up on SEN all week and complain, and actually there have been a number of them ring up and complain about a daniel jacksons tackle on boomer harvey like 3-4 years ago (I don't recall it) that's the extent to which they complain.

I don't care how we win, I just want to rub it in their face... Poor "tough lil aussie battlers" or so they whinge about. Maybe we should whinge and complain about the draw as much as they do

Pathetic club, prostitute club, rabble club. 3 home grounds what a joke. ::)
Title: Re: Jack Ziebell - Thug or what?
Post by: mightytiges on July 20, 2012, 11:04:57 PM
Everyone knew the new interpretation since the start of the year about it being the player who is charging's responsibility to avoid head high contact. IIRC it was a (hospital) handpass that lead to the incident so North couldn't argue Ziebell was going for a marking contest. Like I said in another thread, North fans whinged and cried about Conca's bump in the NAB Cup which was even less of an impact than Ziebell's so karma is sweet :yep.
Title: Re: Jack Ziebell - Thug or what?
Post by: rogerd3 on July 20, 2012, 11:38:59 PM
with a name like Ziebell he should
be ring master in a circus.

then aagain North is run by
a clown.
Title: Re: Jack Ziebell - Thug or what?
Post by: RollsRoyce on July 20, 2012, 11:54:24 PM
Everyone knew the new interpretation since the start of the year about it being the player who is charging's responsibility to avoid head high contact. IIRC it was a (hospital) handpass that lead to the incident so North couldn't argue Ziebell was going for a marking contest. Like I said in another thread, North fans whinged and cried about Conca's bump in the NAB Cup which was even less of an impact than Ziebell's so karma is sweet :yep.

Spot on MT, I haven't forgotten either how they whinged about the Conca bump. Now, when the situation suits them Scott gets on his high horse about how you're taught to go hard at the ball, how it's bad for the game and blah, blah, blah. Sanctimonious hypocrites. No sympathy. I hope we smash ém on Sunday.   
Title: Re: Jack Ziebell - Thug or what?
Post by: Ox on July 21, 2012, 12:14:17 AM
stuff we hate north
Title: Re: Jack Ziebell - Thug or what?
Post by: Eat_em_Alive on July 21, 2012, 01:15:55 AM
stuff we hate north

Hopefully your not sitting near me, ill give em an earful... May even get boomer to climb over the boundary fence and come after me  :shh just joking , but seriously yes we despise nort, nothing, north of anything but. Maybe they can relocate to ballarat and be renamed the " cryle castle kangaroos" they could bring out the animals at halftime and their supporters could feast on the feces with toast.

Jees I'm sick haha
Title: Re: Jack Ziebell - Thug or what?
Post by: Hellenic Tiger on July 21, 2012, 11:55:10 PM
They brought out the elephant onto the ground at Arden St in 1978.

They were a circus then and they are a gypsy circus now.

The Refuse Roos. Playing home games in a country town near you.

Here's their 2013 membership slogan.

If you want excretement then we're your team.

Title: Re: Jack Ziebell - Thug or what?
Post by: Penelope on July 22, 2012, 11:39:49 AM
Everyone knew the new interpretation since the start of the year about it being the player who is charging's responsibility to avoid head high contact. IIRC it was a (hospital) handpass that lead to the incident so North couldn't argue Ziebell was going for a marking contest. Like I said in another thread, North fans whinged and cried about Conca's bump in the NAB Cup which was even less of an impact than Ziebell's so karma is sweet :yep.

Spot on MT, I haven't forgotten either how they whinged about the Conca bump. Now, when the situation suits them Scott gets on his high horse about how you're taught to go hard at the ball, how it's bad for the game and blah, blah, blah. Sanctimonious hypocrites. No sympathy. I hope we smash ém on Sunday.   
i agree fully with you on this rolls, but i would hate to see a richmond bloke get rubbed out like that. he had his eyes on the ball the whole time.
in this case though, its a little bit of what goes around comes around.
Title: Re: Jack Ziebell - Thug or what?
Post by: Judge Roughneck on July 25, 2012, 03:34:24 PM
Due to break his legs soon.
Title: Re: Jack Ziebell - Thug or what?
Post by: charliesmith1921 on August 21, 2012, 09:02:20 PM
Guess you guys are eating your words now with the way North are playing?
Title: Re: Jack Ziebell - Thug or what?
Post by: Loui Tufga on August 21, 2012, 09:04:46 PM
Guess you guys are eating your words now with the way North are playing?

Nup, let's see them continue on with it :lol will go nowhere in the finals :shh
Title: Re: Jack Ziebell - Thug or what?
Post by: Yeahright on August 21, 2012, 09:10:00 PM
Guess you guys are eating your words now with the way North are playing?

Still a thug, better than being a troll though
Title: Re: Jack Ziebell - Thug or what?
Post by: gerkin greg on August 21, 2012, 09:49:04 PM
Ran out of other norf fans to talk to?  :lol
Title: Re: Jack Ziebell - Thug or what?
Post by: charliesmith1921 on August 21, 2012, 09:51:31 PM
I'm concerned we'll lose to Port and could finish as low as 13th. Hate bloody North who don't deserve to do so well. Eating our words is appropriate though after the way we lost our way after everyone talking us up earlier this year.
Title: Re: Jack Ziebell - Thug or what?
Post by: Loui Tufga on August 21, 2012, 10:01:33 PM
I'm concerned we'll lose to Port and could finish as low as 13th. Hate bloody North who don't deserve to do so well. Eating our words is appropriate though after the way we lost our way after everyone talking us up earlier this year.

Really? And who exactly was talking us up? Apart from PNGtiger not to many here expected us to make the finals this year. North on the other hand, has finished 9th now two years running, it was either up or bust for them...
Title: Re: Jack Ziebell - Thug or what?
Post by: charliesmith1921 on August 21, 2012, 10:25:42 PM
Pretty much everyone was talking up the Tigers' march to the finals. Even some Collingwood supporters I knew in late May said that Richmond had changed and was a genuine contender. I knew they were wrong. Same old club culture as we've always had, just waiting for a chance to go off the rails and do silly things like lose to Gold Coast, and for players to play up and get suspended by Benny.

Wish we could do as well as finish 9th. That would be as good a result for us as 1994, 1996, 1998, 2000, 2006 and 2008.
Title: Re: Jack Ziebell - Thug or what?
Post by: dwaino on August 21, 2012, 10:47:28 PM
Stuff 9th. Any other position and we go under the radar. Finish 9th and we won't hear the end of it until end of August 2013. Not that we can finish 9th any more anyway.
Title: Re: Jack Ziebell - Thug or what?
Post by: gerkin greg on August 22, 2012, 09:42:13 AM
Don't know about thug, but he's certainly a plodder who can't kick
Title: Re: Jack Ziebell - Thug or what?
Post by: tdy on May 17, 2013, 10:30:33 PM
Just saw Zeibell leap up into another collision situation with two West Coast players.  He has a tackling problem and he'll get reported more if he doesn't change it.  He keeps leaping up into tackles, maybe he is too short why else would you do it?  Maybe he's just thick.  This time he had the ball but contact was potentially high to the west coast player.
Title: Re: Jack Ziebell - Thug or what?
Post by: Hellenic Tiger on May 17, 2013, 11:44:10 PM
Just another Nought player. Nothing more nothing less.
Just another Nought player who has the character of an old doormat at the back door where the cat sleeps.
Title: Re: Jack Ziebell - Thug or what?
Post by: tigs2011 on May 18, 2013, 02:07:34 AM
Dunno about thug? poo player though?  :yep
Title: Re: Jack Ziebell - Thug or what?
Post by: tdy on May 26, 2013, 10:05:08 PM
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/hammer-time-for-disappointing-roos-20130526-2n5fl.html

The loss may have further fallout, with Jack Ziebell's high bump on Jarryd Lyons during the second quarter likely to be looked at by the match review panel.

Told you he had a tackling problem.
Title: Re: Jack Ziebell - Thug or what?
Post by: tigs2011 on May 27, 2013, 01:09:10 AM
Bye bye stuffwit.  :clapping
Title: Re: Jack Ziebell - Thug or what?
Post by: one-eyed on May 27, 2013, 04:31:00 PM
Ziebell has copped 3 weeks from the MRP


NORTH Melbourne's horror run has continued, with midfielder Jack Ziebell facing a three-match suspension after being cited by the Match Review Panel for a high bump on Adelaide's Jarryd Lyons.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2013-05-27/ziebell-hit-with-bump-ban
Title: Re: Jack Ziebell - Thug or what?
Post by: dwaino on May 27, 2013, 04:34:09 PM
Lol.
Title: Re: Jack Ziebell - Thug or what?
Post by: tigs2011 on May 27, 2013, 04:36:30 PM
Norf will probably win the next 3 now.  :lol
Title: Re: Jack Ziebell - Thug or what?
Post by: dwaino on May 27, 2013, 07:36:43 PM
Sook Robbo sook  :lol