One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: one-eyed on May 12, 2013, 12:42:19 AM

Title: Does Chaplin have anything to worry about from the MRP?
Post by: one-eyed on May 12, 2013, 12:42:19 AM
Ch 7 last night were keen to show a few replays of Chaplin getting Schulz high with his extended arm. Basil Zemplis was saying no doubt the Match Review Panel will take at look at that as they look at everything.
Title: Re: Does Chaplin have anything to worry about from the MRP?
Post by: dwaino on May 12, 2013, 12:52:52 AM
Gee whiz, a bit of a stretch if they sight him. Sarge went in to shepherd and Chaplin stuck an arm up. Was unnecessary but it was soft as.
Title: Re: Does Chaplin have anything to worry about from the MRP?
Post by: Hellenic Tiger on May 12, 2013, 01:02:38 AM
Forceful no.
Reckless not really.
Negligent no.
This is the MRP however and what is safe one week can have the Penang executioner called for duty the next. Let's just wait and see.
Title: Re: Does Chaplin have anything to worry about from the MRP?
Post by: Phil Mrakov on May 12, 2013, 05:55:57 AM
It's Richmond

They'll be frothing out the mouth at the thought of Chappy not playing against the Bummers.

 2 weeks.
Title: Re: Does Chaplin have anything to worry about from the MRP?
Post by: Penelope on May 12, 2013, 07:16:56 AM
it was crude and clumsy (?) prolly worth a stern talking to.

most of the time the MRP are more worried about result rather than intent and i dont thing sarge even felt it.

....but, as with most decisions made by the Awful Football League, who stuffing knows what will happen?
Title: Re: Does Chaplin have anything to worry about from the MRP?
Post by: TigerTimeII on May 12, 2013, 08:19:08 AM
he never connected so really should get off

looked a lot worse than it actually was
Title: Re: Does Chaplin have anything to worry about from the MRP?
Post by: WilliamPowell on May 12, 2013, 09:20:12 AM
It's Schulz's fault, wanted to take Chappy out but didn't know how to  :rollin

It will get looked at and depending on what side the coin comes down will determine his fate  ;D
Title: Re: Does Chaplin have anything to worry about from the MRP?
Post by: Smokey on May 12, 2013, 09:35:51 AM
Ch 7 last night were keen to show a few replays of Chaplin getting Schulz high with his extended arm. Basil Zemplis was saying no doubt the Match Review Panel will take at look at that as they look at everything.

Regardless of the outcome, Basil Zempilas showed himself yesterday to be a fool with some of his commentary.  Was the ring leader in the awful production that was the Ch 7 coverage yesterday.  I have no time for this tosspot whatsoever.
Title: Re: Does Chaplin have anything to worry about from the MRP?
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on May 12, 2013, 10:33:41 AM
Will be viewed but won't be penalized as there was not enough force in the contact IMHO.
Title: Re: Does Chaplin have anything to worry about from the MRP?
Post by: blaisee on May 12, 2013, 10:52:27 AM
insufficient contact
Title: Re: Does Chaplin have anything to worry about from the MRP?
Post by: tigers_of_old_1980 on May 12, 2013, 10:58:51 AM
Nothing in it imo, but the MRP has surprised us in the past.  :(
Title: Re: Does Chaplin have anything to worry about from the MRP?
Post by: Coach on May 13, 2013, 03:55:13 PM
Good to see the double fister show some sort of pig. Even if it was somewhat cowardly
Title: Re: Does Chaplin have anything to worry about from the MRP?
Post by: WilliamPowell on May 13, 2013, 04:34:08 PM
The coin toss came down in our favour

Chaplin's contact to Schulz wasn't even looked at  :rollin

Jay Schulz not so lucky for strking Rance in the first qtr. Got a week but with an early plea and good record he can take a reprimand  ;D

See: http://www.afl.com.au/news/2013-05-13/mrp-statement-round-seven
Title: Re: Does Chaplin have anything to worry about from the MRP?
Post by: mightytiges on May 14, 2013, 02:50:10 AM
The coin toss came down in our favour

Chaplin's contact to Schulz wasn't even looked at  :rollin

Jay Schulz not so lucky for strking Rance in the first qtr. Got a week but with an early plea and good record he can take a reprimand  ;D

See: http://www.afl.com.au/news/2013-05-13/mrp-statement-round-seven
Mark Robinson in his Herald-Sun 'Tackle' column had Tucky being charged for striking  ::) but the MRP didn't look at Tucky's actions either. It wouldn't have mattered anyway with Tucky out injured for weeks.
Title: Re: Does Chaplin have anything to worry about from the MRP?
Post by: tigs2011 on May 14, 2013, 02:29:49 PM
The coin toss came down in our favour

Chaplin's contact to Schulz wasn't even looked at  :rollin

Jay Schulz not so lucky for strking Rance in the first qtr. Got a week but with an early plea and good record he can take a reprimand  ;D

See: http://www.afl.com.au/news/2013-05-13/mrp-statement-round-seven
Mark Robinson in his Herald-Sun 'Tackle' column had Tucky being charged for striking  ::) but the MRP didn't look at Tucky's actions either. It wouldn't have mattered anyway with Tucky out injured for weeks.
Should have punched Redden in the face. Wouldn't have mattered in the grand scheme of things would have been deserving. ;D
Title: Re: Does Chaplin have anything to worry about from the MRP?
Post by: eliminator on May 14, 2013, 02:51:07 PM
The coin toss came down in our favour

Chaplin's contact to Schulz wasn't even looked at  :rollin

Jay Schulz not so lucky for strking Rance in the first qtr. Got a week but with an early plea and good record he can take a reprimand  ;D

See: http://www.afl.com.au/news/2013-05-13/mrp-statement-round-seven

Mark Robinson in his Herald-Sun 'Tackle' column had Tucky being charged for striking  ::) but the MRP didn't look at Tucky's actions either. It wouldn't have mattered anyway with Tucky out injured for weeks.
Should have punched Redden in the face. Wouldn't have mattered in the grand scheme of things would have been deserving. ;

Totally gutless and cheap shot by Redden.
Title: Re: Does Chaplin have anything to worry about from the MRP?
Post by: gerkin greg on May 14, 2013, 03:03:07 PM
you come back on the field you're fair game IMO

play on
Title: Re: Does Chaplin have anything to worry about from the MRP?
Post by: tigs2011 on May 14, 2013, 03:11:27 PM
you come back on the field you're fair game IMO

play on

Agreed. But Tucky should have punched him in the face while he was laughing at him.  ;D
Title: Re: Does Chaplin have anything to worry about from the MRP?
Post by: tigs2011 on May 14, 2013, 03:42:28 PM
Blues BF board is worth a read after Betts copped 5 weeks reduced to 3.  :lol
Title: Re: Does Chaplin have anything to worry about from the MRP?
Post by: WilliamPowell on May 14, 2013, 04:26:01 PM
Blues BF board is worth a read after Betts copped 5 weeks reduced to 3.  :lol

Agree with Betts deserves to be rubbed out

But struth it makes you wonder how they (MRP) come up the reports and penalties that they do

there is just no consistency
Title: Re: Does Chaplin have anything to worry about from the MRP?
Post by: TigerTimeII on May 14, 2013, 06:34:49 PM
The coin toss came down in our favour

Chaplin's contact to Schulz wasn't even looked at  :rollin

Jay Schulz not so lucky for strking Rance in the first qtr. Got a week but with an early plea and good record he can take a reprimand  ;D

See: http://www.afl.com.au/news/2013-05-13/mrp-statement-round-seven

told ya

and westoff should had been reported for faking head high hit to win a free
Title: Re: Does Chaplin have anything to worry about from the MRP?
Post by: WilliamPowell on May 14, 2013, 06:45:44 PM
Kelly from Geelong who copped 2 weeks for what used to be fair bump has had his appeal dismissed

Penalty stands  :gobdrop :gobdrop

RIP the Bump

Thank goodness Scott Turner isn't playing here ads he'd get life under is new pathetic system
Title: Re: Does Chaplin have anything to worry about from the MRP?
Post by: Hellenic Tiger on May 14, 2013, 10:13:33 PM
Kelly from Geelong who copped 2 weeks for what used to be fair bump has had his appeal dismissed

Penalty stands  :gobdrop :gobdrop

RIP the Bump

Thank goodness Scott Turner isn't playing here ads he'd get life under is new pathetic system

What about Lindsay Thomas in round 1. Garbage.
If Nought kid gets off so should the Geelong kid. :wallywink
You can't clear one and suspend the other. :stupid
Title: Re: Does Chaplin have anything to worry about from the MRP?
Post by: Yeahright on May 14, 2013, 11:54:02 PM
He clearly got him high, how's that fair?
Title: Re: Does Chaplin have anything to worry about from the MRP?
Post by: tigs2011 on May 15, 2013, 01:22:39 AM
Goddard said it wasn;t high. So either he didn't get him high or Goddard is a liar. Lying about it should warrant an equal suspension of 2 games.  :shh
Title: Re: Does Chaplin have anything to worry about from the MRP?
Post by: WilliamPowell on May 15, 2013, 07:01:37 AM
Goddard said it wasn;t high. So either he didn't get him high or Goddard is a liar. Lying about it should warrant an equal suspension of 2 games.  :shh

Agree with this  ;D

Thomas got his opponent high, didn't have eyes for the ball only his opponet, was off the ground as well and did more damage but they (MRP) says that's OK because it was a head clash even though at the end of it Thomas' arm is up and away from his bofy

Kelly doesn't raise his arm, is off the ground, doesn't cause any damage even the opponent says that and he cops 2 weeks

Could go on and on case after case that have gone up this season and one minute it's rpeortable the next it's not.

Consistency is the issue here. We don't have any and that's why people are confused and angry

RIP the Bump