One-Eyed Richmond Forum
Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: one-eyed on June 30, 2013, 09:24:10 PM
-
Ivan, Vlastuin and perhaps Tucky all available next week.
Fire away ...?
-
big O and foley out
maric vlas in
-
big O and foley out
maric vlas in
Your kidding Foley!!! Give me a break...............
-
big O and foley out
maric vlas in
Your kidding Foley!!! Give me a break...............
haha, x has a pathological hatred for Foley and Rance
-
If Marics isnt could do with the rest again may as well play Orren - was pretty decent today
Same goes for the Vlas - keep Arnotts
-
I thought Orren's tap work was good today.
Same with Arnott.
Hard week at selection this week.
-
Maric will have to come back in next week. Orrens done a good job in his two games as a replacement and has given Maric a chance to rest up but Maric is the no 1 and he must play next week. Vlastuin should also come in if he is fit and McBean well he could be an X Factor down the road closer to the finals.
-
mcbean -> aedwards :clapping
-
Save Mcbean for Saturday Sept 28.2013.
-
I thought Orren's tap work was good today.
Same with Arnott.
Hard week at selection this week.
Maric will have to come back in next week. Orrens done a good job in his two games as a replacement and has given Maric a chance to rest up but Maric is the no 1 and he must play next week. Vlastuin should also come in if he is fit and McBean well he could be an X Factor down the road closer to the finals.
Big o was good :thumbsup
A caller on SEN who just called in said he went to a pre match function where Maric was present and he said he'd be resting his groin for the next couple of weeks.
-
If Maric is OK he'll come back in
That will be the only change, can't drop Arnot he was good today
-
If Maric is sore just play the O. He was great tonight.
Same for Vlastuin and Arnot.
Tuck I'd give another vfl week maybe.
-
Think we need to give Matty White a run in the 2s. Been really good sub but can't not be giving him full games. He'll lose his fitness.
-
White is a weapon as the sub.
Role tailor made for him.
Last week Gia was running laps after the game. dont see why white cannot do the same.
-
Not sure of it was mentioned but apparently Thomas is in trouble for North
Great news for us if he gets sighted from the MRP
-
Will get one week for a headbutt the way I saw it.
-
Not sure of it was mentioned but apparently Thomas is in trouble for North
Great news for us if he gets sighted from the MRP
Doubt he'll go. Not much contact at all.
-
Jackson got suspended for a similar headbutt to Campbell Brown. It was high and deliberate. Will draw a few activation points IMO.
-
Think we need to give Matty White a run in the 2s. Been really good sub but can't not be giving him full games. He'll lose his fitness.
That's probably not a bad call Pope, Vlas may come back in for White which leaves Arnott in the team, Big O out for Maric and maybe Batch for Tuck...maybe.
-
Not sure of it was mentioned but apparently Thomas is in trouble for North
Great news for us if he gets sighted from the MRP
Doubt he'll go. Not much contact at all.
Will get at least a week for stupidity
And I think he has priors
-
WP how does it compare to Waites
I think they will go down hard after letting him off in Rd 1.
-
I watched it on the news last night, he is gone, no question, it was intentional, he made contact, there was no staging by his opponent his head was clearly moved back by the force of the impact.
-
WP how does it compare to Waites
I think they will go down hard after letting him off in Rd 1.
Don't think you can compare daniel as Waite appears to be a protective species when it comes to the MRP and round 1 of the season.
With the Thomas one, every camera angle shows he headbutted him, didn't push his head into the Giants kid, clear headbutt. Granted no great force but it was stupid (they'll call it reckless, I'd call it INTENTIONAL) so that should be enough for him to get a week
Bigger concern is Petrie kicked 5 so his confidence will be up and he was the difference between the 2 sides last time
-
Didn't Waite go for a very similar head nudge?
-
Didn't Waite go for a very similar head nudge?
Yeah think he got a week - as I said protected species by the MRP - he never cops decent penalities depsite his list of priors
-
WP how does it compare to Waites
I think they will go down hard after letting him off in Rd 1.
Don't think you can compare daniel as Waite appears to be a protective species when it comes to the MRP and round 1 of the season.
With the Thomas one, every camera angle shows he headbutted him, didn't push his head into the Giants kid, clear headbutt. Granted no great force but it was stupid (they'll call it reckless, I'd call it INTENTIONAL) so that should be enough for him to get a week
Bigger concern is Petrie kicked 5 so his confidence will be up and he was the difference between the 2 sides last time
Chaplin will be the difference this time. Towelled Sookwoldt. Will spank flat track Petrie.
-
In: Tuck
Out: some dud
-
In: hardness, toughness, tackles and accuracy.
Out: cuteness, softness, limp-wristed tackles & inaccuracy.
-
Lindsey Louganis offered 2 weeks for headbutt
-
Lindsey Louganis offered 2 weeks for headbutt
Will challenge on grounds it was a head clash. :shh
-
I liked how you delivered that joke on BigFooty better :shh
-
I liked how you delivered that joke on BigFooty better :shh
I can't even remember what I wrote? :shh :lol
-
Mini-me and I will be in Melb for this game. :)
-
In more good news for the Tigers ;D
============================
Thomas could miss two weeks for headbutt
DateJuly 1, 2013 - 3:24PM
Jesse Hogan
Sports writer for The Age
North Melbourne is set to be without its leading goalkicker, Lindsay Thomas, for the next fortnight after he was offered a two-match suspension for headbutting.
In addition to Thomas the match review panel also offered reprimands to Geelong's Joel Corey and Fremantle's Zac Dawson respectively for minor tripping and striking incidents.
Coleman Medal contender Thomas has been punished by the panel for an incident late in the Kangaroos' match against GWS.
Thomas won a stuff for high contact and Townsend bumped him. The Kangaroos player responded by grappling with his opponent and leaning forcefully into him, pushing his forehead into Townsend's. The Giants player immediately complained about the incident to the presiding umpire, Sam Hay.
The punishment would ordinarily be cut from two matches to one with a guilty plea. That could not occur for Thomas because the Kangaroos forward was saddled with 88.75 carry-over points for a bump that broke the jaw of Melbourne's Daniel Nicholson late last year.
If Thomas accepts the penalty he would miss the Kangaroos' matches against Richmond and Brisbane. If he elected to challenge the panel decision at the tribunal he would risk also missing the round-17 match against Carlton.
Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/thomas-could-miss-two-weeks-for-headbutt-20130701-2p70o.html#ixzz2XlmrMdZH
-
Mini-me and I will be in Melb for this game. :)
:clapping :clapping
We'll have to meet up Julz :thumbsup
-
Don't believe will make any changes unless Maric okay then will bring in. Big O was good as was biscuit. Tough call to drop biscuit for vlas.
-
The Barometer - Round 15
Herald-Sun
July 1, 2013
RICHMOND
ON THE BLOCK: Orren Stephenson is at the mercy of Ivan Maric’s groin soreness despite acquitting himself well against the Saints. Matt Arnot was rock solid on debut and would be stiff to miss.
ON THE CUSP: David Astbury is expected to return while Maric must prove his fitness later in the week. The Tigers blew a three-quarter time lead over reigning VFL premiers Geelong to go down by 20 points. Out-of-favour goal sneak Robin Nahas was among the Tigers best as was Shane Tuck and Ricky Petterd. Nahas boasts a good record (12 goals from six matches) against North and could earn a reprieve, exposing the Kangaroos’ backs for speed.
GILBERT GARDINER’S FORECAST: A top four spot is there if Richmond wants it bad enough. The midfield runs deep. Jack and Tyrone can work in tandem with devastating effect and the back six can hold up under pressure. But the fact remains, Richmond’s yet to knock off a team in its own ‘weight division’. North Melbourne, a team the Tigers have struggled with in recent times, is the prime candidate. Game on!
http://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/the-barometer-whos-hurt-and-whos-in-line-for-selection-in-afl-round-15/story-fndv7pj3-1226672642049
-
Loved the game against St Kilda, Dan Jackson continued to be better than he was worse. Loved McEvoys hit against Arnott where McEvoy nearly knocked himself out. Loved Arnotts game as well. Cotch not looking his usual sparkling self, has been off for a few weeks now, is there a niggling knee injury there?
Big O was adequate and better than I thought he would be.
Matty White was great again and very effective.
Now I want to ask all you footy gurus a question about who is our best match up against the player who single handedly beat us last year...Boomer Harvey. We had no one who could stay with him and he is way too dangerous to let him roam free. I was thinking that Matty White should tag him. He has the speed and maybe the skill to negate Harvey. Any legs to this line of thought from OER Brains trust
-
let cotch go head to head with him
.....or even jacko :rollin
-
Loved the game against St Kilda, Dan Jackson continued to be better than he was worse. Loved McEvoys hit against Arnott where McEvoy nearly knocked himself out. Loved Arnotts game as well. Cotch not looking his usual sparkling self, has been off for a few weeks now, is there a niggling knee injury there?
Big O was adequate and better than I thought he would be.
Matty White was great again and very effective.
Now I want to ask all you footy gurus a question about who is our best match up against the player who single handedly beat us last year...Boomer Harvey. We had no one who could stay with him and he is way too dangerous to let him roam free. I was thinking that Matty White should tag him. He has the speed and maybe the skill to negate Harvey. Any legs to this line of thought from OER Brains trust
Morris for me.. Just doesn't get beaten. Imagine lining up on Morris, you would think 'stuff I'm going to earn every kick and be very sore tomorrow.... And the next day....and the next day.'
-
Loved the game against St Kilda, Dan Jackson continued to be better than he was worse. Loved McEvoys hit against Arnott where McEvoy nearly knocked himself out. Loved Arnotts game as well. Cotch not looking his usual sparkling self, has been off for a few weeks now, is there a niggling knee injury there?
Big O was adequate and better than I thought he would be.
Matty White was great again and very effective.
Now I want to ask all you footy gurus a question about who is our best match up against the player who single handedly beat us last year...Boomer Harvey. We had no one who could stay with him and he is way too dangerous to let him roam free. I was thinking that Matty White should tag him. He has the speed and maybe the skill to negate Harvey. Any legs to this line of thought from OER Brains trust
Morris for me.. Just doesn't get beaten. Imagine lining up on Morris, you would think 'stuff I'm going to earn every kick and be very sore tomorrow.... And the next day....and the next day.'
The Indian looking guy did not like morris close marking :shh
-
Loved the game against St Kilda, Dan Jackson continued to be better than he was worse. Loved McEvoys hit against Arnott where McEvoy nearly knocked himself out. Loved Arnotts game as well. Cotch not looking his usual sparkling self, has been off for a few weeks now, is there a niggling knee injury there?
Big O was adequate and better than I thought he would be.
Matty White was great again and very effective.
Now I want to ask all you footy gurus a question about who is our best match up against the player who single handedly beat us last year...Boomer Harvey. We had no one who could stay with him and he is way too dangerous to let him roam free. I was thinking that Matty White should tag him. He has the speed and maybe the skill to negate Harvey. Any legs to this line of thought from OER Brains trust
I like your idea of White on Boomer as he probably needs a full game anyway and I'd make Newman the sub. I'd love to see newy play forward a lot more too.
I'd rest Maric for the next 2 weeks and give the big O those games then Ivan should be cherry ripe for an assault on the big three.
I wouldn't change anything this week but I'd consider giving King a rest next week to bring in Vlastuin or Tuck.
The most pleasing thing is we don't need to resort to bringing in Nanas.
-
Mini-me and I will be in Melb for this game. :)
:clapping :clapping
We'll have to meet up Julz :thumbsup
Hey WP.
Julzqld ,Mini Me are sitting next to me and my daughter
Aisle 46 :thumbsup
-
let cotch go head to head with him
.....or even jacko :rollin
I would rather have them worry about Cotch running free, bind up Booker with a shut down player. Morris may well be the go but I think Whites speed would help out there, Plus Kingy resting with Tuck floating in mid field and @ CHF ish as he plays very tall and is a good kick for goal....??
-
sit hard on wells and boomer and fill the hole in front of Petrie and it's game over
-
Mini-me and I will be in Melb for this game. :)
:clapping :clapping
We'll have to meet up Julz :thumbsup
Hey WP.
Julzqld ,Mini Me are sitting next to me and my daughter
Aisle 46 :thumbsup
haven't got our tickets yet Jack , taking care of that tonight
-
sit hard on wells and boomer and fill the hole in front of Petrie and it's game over
Jacko to chicken wing Boomer in the first. Get it done Jacko. :clapping
-
critical to subdue Petrie. North have a good midfield as well as a good ruckman in Goldstein. Need to dominate clearances.
-
i post rarely these days
read the garbage thats posted though, lol
-
dont worry jackie ol boy, well lose on soon and normal transmission can resume
-
:wallywink
you know who u r
-
RICHMOND - In the Mix
Nick Vlastuin will probably play after being a late withdrawal against St Kilda with a corked shin while David Astbury (ankle) is expected to be available. The Tigers will test Ivan Maric (groin) throughout the week. Shane Tuck had 31 touches in his VFL return from a shoulder injury on the weekend and Ricky Petterd had 29, Robin Nahas 24 and Sam Lonergan 22, but after the Tigers' 64-point win over the Saints, competition for spots is hot. - Jennifer Phelan
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2013-07-02/afls-in-the-mix-round-15
-
For me,
Out: Batchelor
In: Vlastuin (provided his shin problems are completely gone)
-
dont worry jackie ol boy, well lose on soon and normal transmission can resume
Good point Al, it's a little baffling how when we are winning all posters are poohouse and he doesn't feel the need to post dribble and yet the minute we lose he's like a teenager at a one direction concert, front row and squealing like a stuck pig
-
Got our seats and pre-purchased a parking pass
:gobdrop :gobdrop $32.35 to park the car :gobdrop
-
dont worry jackie ol boy, well lose on soon and normal transmission can resume
Good point Al, it's a little baffling how when we are winning all posters are poohouse and he doesn't feel the need to post dribble and yet the minute we lose he's like a teenager at a one direction concert, front row and squealing like a stuck pig
:lol
-
Got our seats and pre-purchased a parking pass
:gobdrop :gobdrop $32.35 to park the car :gobdrop
Think there will be general admin tickets still available at the gate WP?
-
Got our seats and pre-purchased a parking pass
:gobdrop :gobdrop $32.35 to park the car :gobdrop
Think there will be general admin tickets still available at the gate WP?
No doubt, the crowd size will have nothing to do with N0rt supporters but how many of our army turn up.
Bought seats because we didnt want to sit upon level 3
-
Usually park behind the restaurants at New Quay for $10.00
Short walk to ground :thumbsup
WP, what Aisle you in ?
-
Aisle 3
-
dont worry jackie ol boy, well lose on soon and normal transmission can resume
Good point Al, it's a little baffling how when we are winning all posters are poohouse and he doesn't feel the need to post dribble and yet the minute we lose he's like a teenager at a one direction concert, front row and squealing like a stuck pig
He is not the only one we have a whole front row full of them
-
No Maric again this week.
Vlastuin to be monitored.
Tucky a show this week.
http://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/2013-07-03/maric-to-miss-kangaroos-clash
-
Tuck for Batch or White maybe the only change if we have any at all.
-
which of the roo's forwards do you envisage Tuck lining up on?
-
which of the roo's forwards do you envisage Tuck lining up on?
Don't be silly, its obviously Petrie.
But seriously even you must know he doesn't mean Tuck in the backline although I am curious who he expects to play the 3rd tall back?
-
which of the roo's forwards do you envisage Tuck lining up on?
Don't be silly, its obviously Petrie.
But seriously even you must know he doesn't mean Tuck in the backline although I am curious who he expects to play the 3rd tall back?
Never assume anything
-
which of the roo's forwards do you envisage Tuck lining up on?
Don't be silly, its obviously Petrie.
But seriously even you must know he doesn't mean Tuck in the backline although I am curious who he expects to play the 3rd tall back?
Dead right....it's just al being a smart ass again. Do we need a 3rd tall back?? Wouldn't even be surprised if A Edawards did a bit there just like he did across half back last week...could be anyone though.
-
Stuff me, the Football brains of some on this forum just astound me. If Tuck comes in for Batchelor then I'll leave this forum for good. There is no stuffing way we will replace a KPB with a mid. If and i say "If" we were to drop Batch for another other than another KBP it would most probably be Pettard but even that would be a selection shock in my opinion.
-
dont worry jackie ol boy, well lose on soon and normal transmission can resume
i reckon thats a bit harsh.
jack gets criticised all the time for being negative i suppose me too. so hes cut back the posts like me.
yet generally win lose or draw id say jacks stance has been consistent when commenting on players.
when we win i reckon jck should acknowledge the win more often than he does.but ya know wins dont change player skillset ability smarts etc.
i reckon we all knew weeks ago the real tests were coming.
we have nm a genuine 50/50 game carlton 50/50. we have to play an improved gcs in cairns where we have struggled and we have top 4 sides in freo haw and sydney yet most carry on as if we are already top 6 and likely top 4. theres a real possibility still that we will be in a dog fight just to make it. if we want credability we need to really perform against all those sides mentioned.
imo and i reckon there is some who think the same way, we have problems in defence with talls. problems forweard with talls. and we have ruck problems in short we are brittle structurally.
-
Tuck for Batch or White maybe the only change if we have any at all.
Bring in tuck, so he can amass 40 disposals and put em straight in boomers hands ;D
-
Stuff me, the Football brains of some on this forum just astound me. If Tuck comes in for Batchelor then I'll leave this forum for good. There is no stuffing way we will replace a KPB with a mid. If and i say "If" we were to drop Batch for another other than another KBP it would most probably be Pettard but even that would be a selection shock in my opinion.
:lol
-
which of the roo's forwards do you envisage Tuck lining up on?
Don't be silly, its obviously Petrie.
But seriously even you must know he doesn't mean Tuck in the backline although I am curious who he expects to play the 3rd tall back?
Dead right....it's just al being a smart ass again. Do we need a 3rd tall back?? Wouldn't even be surprised if A Edawards did a bit there just like he did across half back last week...could be anyone though.
LOL. Theres more chance of Tuck being picked to play down back than edwards.
-
Tuck for Batch or White maybe the only change if we have any at all.
Bring in tuck, so he can amass 40 disposals and put em straight in boomers hands ;D
Hahahaha.
Ryan Crowley will be pinching from the stands.
Jako will be pinching on the ground.
Boomer will be having another sook.
-
Batchelor will stay in to play on Aaron Black no smart ar$$ comments there.
Has to be done, been great for Nought this year.
-
there will be no change
-
Tuck for Batch or White maybe the only change if we have any at all.
Bring in tuck, so he can amass 40 disposals and put em straight in boomers hands ;D
That's ok we will just give him another chicken wing, he can cry to the umps about that
-
which of the roo's forwards do you envisage Tuck lining up on?
Don't be silly, its obviously Petrie.
But seriously even you must know he doesn't mean Tuck in the backline although I am curious who he expects to play the 3rd tall back?
Dead right....it's just al being a smart ass again. Do we need a 3rd tall back?? Wouldn't even be surprised if A Edawards did a bit there just like he did across half back last week...could be anyone though.
Probably considering they use 3 tall forwards, or did when I last saw them. A Edwards didn't have a man in the back 50 he was just working his ass off the HF line. Would need another "tall" back
-
Sounds like Tuck will spend another week in the Magoo's. The Petrie
match up will have to wait.... :lol
-
Richmond young gun Nick Vlastuin appears set to return for the Tigers on Saturday.
While ruckman Ivan Maric will miss his second consecutive game with a groin problem, Richmond coach Damien Hardwick expected Vlastuin, who missed the Tigers win over St Kilda with a shin injury but trained with the main group today, to put his hand up for selection.
"He quite possibly could have played last week but being a first year player we sort of took it easy with him," Hardwick said.
"He'll certainly put his hand up. He's a very good player to come back into the side. The unfortunate thing is one of our players has to miss out who played probably well last week."
http://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/teams-collingwood-is-expected-to-name-darren-jolly-while-hawthorns-cyril-rioli-remains-in-contention/story-fndv7pj3-1226674313901
-
Arnott out ? Vlastuin in
-
tough on Arnot but seems most likely
-
watching the interview Arnott understands and accepts that. will just go back to the seconds and continue working hard until the next opportunity arises.
thats the sort of character you want your players to have
-
which of the roo's forwards do you envisage Tuck lining up on?
Don't be silly, its obviously Petrie.
But seriously even you must know he doesn't mean Tuck in the backline although I am curious who he expects to play the 3rd tall back?
Dead right....it's just al being a smart ass again. Do we need a 3rd tall back?? Wouldn't even be surprised if A Edawards did a bit there just like he did across half back last week...could be anyone though.
Interesting now my comments after the Suns game and Hardwicks comments about Edwards down back..... :whistle
-
Was pretty average there
Would rather griffiths height
-
did he play on talls?
-
did he play on talls?
Did the job that he was asked to do, could of done the same against the Roos!!
-
bullplop.
the discussion about the roos was him replacing a tall defender, ie to play on a tall.
morris does his job down back, but he wouldnt line up on KPF.
I think you'll find he played on mid sized forwards, but if you reckon that means he could have curbed one of the tall North forwards that our taller defenders struggled against then good for you.
-
bullplop.
the discussion about the roos was him replacing a tall defender, ie to play on a tall.
morris does his job down back, but he wouldnt line up on KPF.
I think you'll find he played on mid sized forwards, but if you reckon that means he could have curbed one of the tall North forwards that our taller defenders struggled against then good for you.
My discussion was bringing Tuck in for Batch and playing Edwards in the backline, nothing about Edwards playing on a tall defender, they didn't have 6 tall forwards!!!!
Just another example of you not liking it when I make a good call.. :wallywink
-
:lol a good call.
edwards was of the extra men hardwick put back when we had the wind against us. In the last quarter when we didnt need the extra men back he subbed edwards off.
Batchelor had been playing the third tall role, and often was found out due to lack of height,(amonst other things) and subsequently was again against north and their tall forward line,yet you wanted to replace him with a bloke 4cm shorter. so if he wasnt going to play on the third tall for north, who was?
Now when that bloke plays a role acroos half back when we stack the backline kicking into a strong breeze you somehow think it justifies your odd, ill thought out theory to have him replace batchelor against north.
LMAO @ I dont like it when you get a call right. why would i be upset at the law of averages unfolding?
Its a little bit like the 1000 monkeys theory....
The main difference is the monkeys wouldn't proclaim to the world they actually knew what they doing afterwards.
-
:lol a good call.
edwards was of the extra men hardwick put back when we had the wind against us. In the last quarter when we didnt need the extra men back he subbed edwards off.
Batchelor had been playing the third tall role, and often was found out due to lack of height,(amonst other things) and subsequently was again against north and their tall forward line,yet you wanted to replace him with a bloke 4cm shorter. so if he wasnt going to play on the third tall for north, who was?
Now when that bloke plays a role acroos half back when we stack the backline kicking into a strong breeze you somehow think it justifies your odd, ill thought out theory to have him replace batchelor against north.
LMAO @ I dont like it when you get a call right. why would i be upset at the law of averages unfolding?
Its a little bit like the 1000 monkeys theory....
The main difference is the monkeys wouldn't proclaim to the world they actually knew what they doing afterwards.
He took him off because they didn't need another man forward...not back, go read his article.!!
4cm....pft....honestly...4cm, what a load of crock, do you really think the coaching panel give a flying stuff about 4cm....
BTW, the law of averages is working more in my favour than yours lately.. :thumbsup
-
And Batch was dropped to, what's that telling you!! He is playing poo!! Another call I have been making for about 3 weeks.
-
He took him off because they didn't need another man forward...not back, go read his article.!!
so where does that mean he was going to play him that quarter, when kicking with the wind? :lol
yep, batch was dropped, but not for the north game who have a taller/stronger forward setup than GC and where we did not intend to play extra men behind the ball.
Just as well the coaches pay some attention to structure when they make changes, rather than just look to the worst performing player and drop them for anyone performing without giving any thought to structural make up of the team, until someone points out the bleeding obvious to them and then clutching at the nearest curly straw.
As for 4cm, may not be too much but when you are replacing someone who is already a bit short, another 4cm makes a fair difference, or do you actually think playing a 184cm forward as a backman on a 192cm strong marking forward is a good matchup?
-
He took him off because they didn't need another man forward...not back, go read his article.!!
so where does that mean he was going to play him that quarter, when kicking with the wind? :lol
yep, batch was dropped, but not for the north game who have a taller/stronger forward setup than GC and where we did not intend to play extra men behind the ball.
Just as well the coaches pay some attention to structure when they make changes, rather than just look to the worst performing player and drop them for anyone performing without giving any thought to structural make up of the team, until someone points out the bleeding obvious to them and then clutching at the nearest curly straw.
As for 4cm, may not be too much but when you are replacing someone who is already a bit short, another 4cm makes a fair difference, or do you actually think playing a 184cm forward as a backman on a 192cm strong marking forward is a good matchup?
Yes al.. :wallywink :laugh:
-
Why is thread still going? :rollin