One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: TigerLand on September 10, 2016, 03:15:13 PM

Title: 8 players with less than 50 games
Post by: TigerLand on September 10, 2016, 03:15:13 PM
Running out in a final for Sydney today. Extraordinary.

Makes our iceberg look like an ice cube.

2017 the year of being angry.
Title: Re: 8 players with less than 50 games
Post by: Stalin on September 10, 2016, 03:19:07 PM
Non-stable but
Title: Re: 8 players with less than 50 games
Post by: 🏅Dooks on September 10, 2016, 04:23:32 PM
Why play finals when we can be stable?
Title: Re: 8 players with less than 50 games
Post by: Chuck17 on September 10, 2016, 04:28:45 PM
They have gone past us
Title: Re: 8 players with less than 50 games
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on September 10, 2016, 04:30:42 PM
They have gone past us
Teams in the NEAFL have gone passed us Chuck.
Title: Re: 8 players with less than 50 games
Post by: Chuck17 on September 10, 2016, 04:33:01 PM
They have gone past us
Teams in the NEAFL have gone passed us Chuck.

Oh well it gives the Whiney bunnies something to carry on about
Title: Re: 8 players with less than 50 games
Post by: naturaldisaster on September 10, 2016, 04:34:00 PM
Let's face it the afl is rigge
I'm not saying we don't have our flaws but the last 10 grand finals have been the same bloody teams with the exception of st kildas rise, a few teams haven't won a flag in 20 plus years while teams like hawthorn go in and out of dominance.

Then the Afl brings in two new teams and gives them the top picks while teams like ourselves we're rebuilding.  That alone shows the afl doesn't give a poo about Richmond
.
Title: Re: 8 players with less than 50 games
Post by: Stalin on September 10, 2016, 04:34:42 PM
How bout mummy tackle on tippet

Good thing we didn't chance mummy ... After all we got the mighty hamspud 
Title: Re: 8 players with less than 50 games
Post by: 🏅Dooks on September 10, 2016, 04:36:06 PM
The swans can have all their flags and good players.

We have stability. They dont.

End of story
Title: Re: 8 players with less than 50 games
Post by: naturaldisaster on September 10, 2016, 04:37:31 PM
The best organisation are stable, however they need to be adaptive to change not unstable
Title: Re: 8 players with less than 50 games
Post by: naturaldisaster on September 10, 2016, 04:39:38 PM
Also I'm not meaning to make excuses by any means but teams like us have to work so much harder when teams like gws  get a flag almost gifted to them and we get nothing it's bs
It is why the comp is so unequal.
Title: Re: 8 players with less than 50 games
Post by: (•))(©™ on September 10, 2016, 04:45:21 PM
The swans can have all their flags and good players.

We have stability. They dont.

End of story

and as far as I can tell, we are only half way through their vision of returning as the top Victorian club by 2020.
Title: Re: 8 players with less than 50 games
Post by: Fluffy Tiger on September 10, 2016, 04:47:00 PM
They have gone past us

They have almost gone past everybody. Surely you could of seen this 4 years ago. If they can convince most to stay on less money than the market will pay then they have several flags in the very near future,  Can't single out the Tigers at fault for this one.
Title: Re: 8 players with less than 50 games
Post by: Stalin on September 10, 2016, 04:50:17 PM
Let's face it the afl is rigge
I'm not saying we don't have our flaws but the last 10 grand finals have been the same bloody teams with the exception of st kildas rise, a few teams haven't won a flag in 20 plus years while teams like hawthorn go in and out of dominance.

Then the Afl brings in two new teams and gives them the top picks while teams like ourselves we're rebuilding.  That alone shows the afl doesn't give a poo about Richmond
.

Correct - but it's still a pretty weak excuse of a club Richmond
Title: Re: 8 players with less than 50 games
Post by: 🏅Dooks on September 10, 2016, 06:44:49 PM
The swans can have all their flags and good players.

We have stability. They dont.

End of story

and as far as I can tell, we are only half way through their vision of returning as the top Victorian club by 2020.

'Richmond - where confused aspirations are tempered by incompetance.
Title: Re: 8 players with less than 50 games
Post by: Diocletian on September 10, 2016, 08:14:47 PM
They have gone past us
Teams in the NEAFL have gone passed us Chuck.

GWS reserves would flog us by 10 goals...
Title: Re: 8 players with less than 50 games
Post by: 🏅Dooks on September 10, 2016, 08:21:05 PM
They have gone past us
Teams in the NEAFL have gone passed us Chuck.

GWS reserves would flog us by 10 goals...

Oh look, theyre a quality side
Title: Re: 8 players with less than 50 games
Post by: Harry on September 10, 2016, 08:21:45 PM
Yeah but the swans didn't boycott mmm.  What's the point of winning flags if you don't have a morale compass.
Title: Re: 8 players with less than 50 games
Post by: tdy on September 10, 2016, 11:12:04 PM
And where do the suns come up in all of this? They were supposed to be playing off for the flag too until Carnival Hunt and his party boy antics influenced the younger ones.