One-Eyed Richmond Forum
Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: pmac21 on April 22, 2022, 09:42:46 PM
-
Finding it very hard to stomach Jack Higgins playing himself into AA contention when we got Matty Parker & George running around in our forward line.
-
Really? Who cares?
He wanted out. Wasn't prepared to fight to get back into the side.
Better off without him
-
Yep, WP is right. Higgins walked out on us.
I would argue he would be just ordinary like he was in the second half of last year with St Kilda if he was still with us given our poor midfield-forwards connection. This year the Saints' midfield group is far better and working harder applying immense pressure on the opposition while Max King has straightened them up as a team. So St Kilda's forward entries, whether from clearances or tonight more from turnovers, are cleaner into a more open forward line and more predictable to read for their small forwards like Higgins. They're second on the ladder now for a reason and Higgins is benefitting feeding off the workrate of his teammates upfield.
Anyway, we'll see how Tom Brown and Judson Clarke go over their careers who we ultimately both got in return (via future picks) for Higgins before we judge who came out in front.
-
Really? Who cares?
He wanted out. Wasn't prepared to fight to get back into the side.
Better off without him
no we're not.
I was a critic of his at times but he's shown to be fantastic for the Saints. We don't have a decent small forward at the present time so no, we're not better off without him
-
He wanted out? Especially after his brain issues and the support we offered him during that period?
He had ample opportunity with us even after this I’m kinda shocked that he actually wanted to leave us when he was only with us for such a short time.
-
The bloke didn't want to work hard to win a spot even after club backed him.What we get in return for him again ?.
-
Has he won a flag yet, and how many have the saints won again???
-
no we're not.
I was a critic of his at times but he's shown to be fantastic for the Saints. We don't have a decent small forward at the present time so no, we're not better off without him
We are better off.
Don't let good games with St Kilda while they are winning fool you. Where was he last year when their season was going down the toilet
End of the day he wanted out.
We are better off simple because you want players who want to be at your club. Who are prepared to work hard to earn or keep their spot. He's a bloke who said he couldn't understand why he was dropped in 2020. Why he didn't get picked in the 2020 GF side. A bloke who when traded but hadn't played a game for them said he'd always wanted to play with St Kilda and felt he was home :facepalm
Our Club backed him, supported him with his health issues but it wasn't enough. It would appear all he really wanted or believed he was entitled to was free ticket into the side every week.
You're entitled to your opinion
But in my opinion we are much better off without him
-
The kid is a simpleton who got a brain injury.
It's a miracle he's back playing footy let alone being the most dangerous small forward in the game at this minute. He would have kicked 6 against us if he didn't get hurt.
I'm speaking from a purely footy perspective when it comes to who you would want in your side. Jason Castagna or Jack Higgins. stuff me what a difficult choice. And the Saints actually play him forward...:shh
-
Remember Dan butler’s debut season with saints? It’s not like he’s Eddie betts. I’m happy Higgins is getting games and he can showcase his talent but as everyone else said he wanted out and I doubt he’d be lighting it up with our team’s current poor tacking poor defensive work and shoddy inside 50s
-
Nothing wrong with being disappointed with seeing one of our draftees go on to be successful. But that's footy.
What we have been poor tho is recruiting to fill the space that has been left by Lloyd, Higgins and Butler. Absolutely no small forward apart from Judson Clarke who looks a Ayer which is great. Think banking on Aarts and Castagna has been a bit negligent. Lookin forward to seeing Clarke come into the side soon.
-
I’m hoping MRJ develops to be the best small forward this decade
-
Small forwards was our strength but now our weekness , George and arts for Bulter and Higgins ?
-
Nothing wrong with being disappointed with seeing one of our draftees go on to be successful. But that's footy.
What we have been poor tho is recruiting to fill the space that has been left by Lloyd, Higgins and Butler. Absolutely no small forward apart from Judson Clarke who looks a Ayer which is great. Think banking on Aarts and Castagna has been a bit negligent. Lookin forward to seeing Clarke come into the side soon.
Like I said before our list management has been terrible over the last 4 years.
Surely there would have been some cheap finds to fill needs especially in our midfield.
How MRJ isn’t getting regular game time is confusing to me as well. His vfl output is better than others in the seniors.
Love to know our age profile now, especially that middle bracket.
-
I don't think small forward was ever a strength of ours. The one area they prospered was defensive fwd pressure but people have argued right along that that has never been enough and we should have been aiming for more rounded fwds.
Maybe the one we will regret losing is Stengle.Nothing wrong with being disappointed with seeing one of our draftees go on to be successful. But that's footy.
What we have been poor tho is recruiting to fill the space that has been left by Lloyd, Higgins and Butler. Absolutely no small forward apart from Judson Clarke who looks a Ayer which is great. Think banking on Aarts and Castagna has been a bit negligent. Lookin forward to seeing Clarke come into the side soon.
Like I said before our list management has been terrible over the last 4 years.
Surely there would have been some cheap finds to fill needs especially in our midfield.
How MRJ isn’t getting regular game time is confusing to me as well. His vfl output is better than others in the seniors.
Love to know our age profile now, especially that middle bracket.
MRJ Two games last year were two of the most underwhelming games i have seen up there with Samson Ryan.
If he is dominating in the two,s then i agree we need to look at him again. Imo anything would be better than Castagna and Aarts.
The age profile of the list is the following.
Juniors aged 18 - 21. New players we will develop to find out if they are worth persevering with in 3 or 4 seasons time.they mostly need to develop physically as well.
Stack 21y/33g
Sonsie 10y/0g
Ryan 21y/1g
Ross 21y/32g
M Rioli 19y/2g
R/smith 20y/9g
Nyuon 20y/0g
Martyn 20y/3g
Mansell 21y/13g
Dow 20y/10g
Cumberland 21y/0g
Clarke 18y/0g
Brown 18y/og
Banks 19y/0g
Gibcus 19y/3g
Then we have the 22 - 24 yo development players. Basically juniors we have deemed good enough to retain and develop further.
Miller 22y/3g
RC-D 22Y/9g
Colina 22y/0g
Balta 22y/48g
Bolton 23y/71g
Baker 24y/67g
Graham 24y/77g
Then we have the 25-28yo Mature players who are in their prime and mostly fully developed.
Rioli 25y/118g
Castagna 25y/121g
Soldo 25y/39g
Parker 26y/28g
Short 26y/118g
Aarts 27y/38g
Nankervis 27y/102g
Vlastuin 28y/174g
Vets aged 29 plus are
Broad 29y/89g
Caddy 29y/174g
Prestia 29y/176g
Lynch 29y/198g
Pickett 30y/43g
Grimes 30y/193g
Martin 30y/261g
Tarrant 32y/179g
Cotchin 32y/273g
Edwards 33/286g
Riewoldt 33y/308g
-
Aarts at 27, blows me away.
Plenty of list management needed here. The key is timing.
-
MRJ Two games last year were two of the most underwhelming games i have seen up there with Samson Ryan.
Gee 2 kids who have been described as long term prospects. Get given games way before they were ready and despite you harping on about giving kids games you have to complain that they were "most underwhelming"
Seriously, make up your mind! Games into the kids or not? You can't have it both ways. You wonder why posters get frustrated with your posts. :help
-
I agree with Wilbur. You’re quick to lay the boots into others or players but don’t seem to recognise your own failings.
-
MRJ Two games last year were two of the most underwhelming games i have seen up there with Samson Ryan.
Gee 2 kids who have been described as long term prospects. Get given games way before they were ready and despite you harping on about giving kids games you have to complain that they were "most underwhelming"
Seriously, make up your mind! Games into the kids or not? You can't have it both ways. You wonder why posters get frustrated with your posts. :help
Im actually have a good old chuckle at this.
So lets revise what i said. First a bit of honesty his two games were horrid and gifts, for that matter he did little in the two's and he got two games on reputation. If you think im advocating kids at any cost then you gravely mistaken.
The only thing im advocating is when they show a bit play em. Especially in front of blokes who have been around for years and god knows how many games but are still the same.
Play our kids when they show a bit and nearly all have. If we have a chronic weakness in the ones then fmd try a kid.
We are not playing kids except when injury hits thats it mostly. Yet here we are an ageing team who cn only go backwards but cannot find a way to get games into younger players. Dunno what you call that but it smacks of delusion imo.
I can put with losses with trying kids but the same old poo over and over ? that sets us up for long term pain.