One-Eyed Richmond Forum
General => General Discussion => Topic started by: Moi on September 23, 2006, 07:56:53 PM
-
Let's have two interstate teams in their grand final lol
-
Let's have two interstate teams in their grand final lol
:lol
Yeah watch the Sydneysiders have a whinge. Looking good for the Storm so far :thumbsup.
-
Melbourne 6
St George 0
:rollin
-
12-6 at half-time :thumbsup
-
They're coming back ???
What do you guys think of the video umpire and would it fit our game?
Doesn't seem to take up too much time and I would rather see a correct decision than missing out on possibly winning a game because of a blind umpie :wallywink
-
It's over. Storm through to the GF :woohoo
The video ref works in NRL because the play stops anyway whether it's a try or not. In Aussie Rules it would penalise the side kicking-in if it was a point anyway. It's not perfect either. The Storm could easily argue that their disallowed try was a try as the ball went backwards in goal.
You love interstate teams don't you Moi lol ;).
-
You love interstate teams don't you Moi lol ;).
Proud Victorian, MT :bow
stuff the rest lol :lol
-
I usually dont watch rugby but i didnt mind it today. Good win by the storm lets hope they get up next week v broncos
-
Inglis is very good.
-
I really wanted the Storm to win. Now I'm in a dilemma as the Broncos are the local team. Would be a nice farewell for Shane Webke if they win.
-
I still don't fully understand the rules of NRL, but go the Storm! :P
-
Inglis is very good.
With his athleticism, build and smarts he would have been perfect for modern day Aussie Rules.
-
I really wanted the Storm to win. Now I'm in a dilemma as the Broncos are the local team. Would be a nice farewell for Shane Webke if they win.
Get him a nice "sad to see you go" card from the local newsagent instead. Anyway, Storm has a few Qld players - including the Qld and Aust hooker! Go Storm.
-
I reckon a few AFL teams (the tigers included) could learn alot from the way the Storm go about it.
No matter what they stick to their plan, paly ofor one another and play the percentages and as a result they get the results.
Last night even when the score was 12-6 I never for one moment thought "gee the Storm are in trouble here" - in control the entire time.
-
Get on Melbourne Storm. Paying 1.75 on centrebet head to head and 2.10 with a 4.5 start. One of the most dominant seasons in the recent history, and the Broncos are just two weeks on from a humiliating defeat at home to St. George, the side Melbourne so ruthlessly killed off on Saturday night.
-
Without trying to mozz them, the Storm have had the wood over the Broncos since they came into the NRL.
-
Go Storm :thumbsup.
What's the point of having a video ref if it isn't used to show up blantantly wrong decisions like the one against the Storm.
Damn the broncos just got a try :P
-
Bugger lol
Oh well, who cares lol
-
LOL Moi ;D
Bad luck to the Storm. Just weren't good enough on the night. The referring was very one-sided too and the wrong calls all went against the Storm which didn't help.
-
LOL Moi ;D
Bad luck to the Storm. Just weren't good enough on the night. The referring was very one-sided too and the wrong calls all went against the Storm which didn't help.
My ex-boss is a director of Storm so na-na-na-na-na :wallywink
-
Just been listening to the ABC and all they wanted to talk about after the game was the poor refereeing and how it decided the game. Storm players that they spoke to didn't blame the ref but imho the game is flawed because the ref has so much influence on the result - much more than the umpires in AFL.
Storm played below their usual form but there's no doubt that they got the short end of about four critical decisions - first Bronco penalty, Bill Slater getting the ball from Bronco player who lost it under the posts, Storm disallowed try and Bronco player touching ball before it went out on the wing - all wrong decisions according to the ABC, including the Queenslanders on the panel.
-
The Storm made too many mistakes and mistackles compared to the Broncos so that's why the players wouldn't use the refereeing as an excuse but yep mjs the refereeing was biased as anything. Cost the Storm at least 8 points with the penalty to Brisbane and the disallowed try. The commentators on Nine are legends of rugby league and even they were surprised by those three decisions at the time.
-
The Storm made too many mistakes and mistackles compared to the Broncos so that's why the players wouldn't use the refereeing as an excuse but yep mjs the refereeing was biased as anything. Cost the Storm at least 8 points with the penalty to Brisbane and the disallowed try. The commentators on Nine are legends of rugby league and even they were surprised by those three decisions at the time.
Make that 2 penalty goals, and with a converted try to King = 10 points >:(...Not to mention the scrum feed that lead to their 2nd try that should have been a Storm scrum feed for a knock on... or the penalty that Slater should have gotten for being dragged into touch... or the penalties Inglis should have received for being held too long in the tackle...3 times!... :banghead
Too many errors on the refs behalf. Made Goldspink look like a champ...who at half-time yesterday was leading the Norm Smith votes...
-
Just been listening to the ABC and all they wanted to talk about after the game was the poor refereeing and how it decided the game. Storm players that they spoke to didn't blame the ref but imho the game is flawed because the ref has so much influence on the result - much more than the umpires in AFL.
[/quo.te]
Hey MJS.
Either your radio is stuck on the ABC or you are veryb articulate?
Anyway , ABC is for kids. ha
-
The Storm will make a official complaint about the refereeing according to SEN.
-
imho the game is flawed because the ref has so much influence on the result - much more than the umpires in AFL.
You're kidding aren't you?? Ever watched a game that involves Maththew Lloyd and his usual swan dive free kicks?? But of course the umpires always get them right and it has little affect on the result. ???
The ref had as much influence on the game as any regular league or AFL game. It comes with the territory. Its just magnified by the importance of the event. The Bronco's won fair and square. Good luck to them. They deseved the win. :thumbsup
Billy Slater is a cocky primadonna who shows very little respect for the opposition with some of the drivel I've heard come out of his mouth pre-game.
It was good to see him knocked down a peg or two.
-
Tiga
It's just an opinion - and it's this:
League, like Union, is more influenced by the style of the referee than AFL is affected by the style of the umpire. For instance if the referee is over technical he can determine the flow of the game and often the result. Despite the fact that most AFL spectators constantly bitch about umpires they rarely affect the outcome of the game imho.
The referree on Sunday affected the result of that game - and I'm hardly a voice in the wilderness in that opinion. My point is that it's not an uncommon event in League (and Union) compared to AFL.
-
Tiga
It's just an opinion - and it's this:
League, like Union, is more influenced by the style of the referee than AFL is affected by the style of the umpire. For instance if the referee is over technical he can determine the flow of the game and often the result. Despite the fact that most AFL spectators constantly bitch about umpires they rarely affect the outcome of the game imho.
The referree on Sunday affected the result of that game - and I'm hardly a voice in the wilderness in that opinion. My point is that it's not an uncommon event in League (and Union) compared to AFL.
For once mjs. I totally agree.
I will also say that the AFL umpires do a very good job.