One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: one-eyed on October 09, 2006, 04:37:59 PM

Title: Non RFC trade talk
Post by: one-eyed on October 09, 2006, 04:37:59 PM
St Kilda are offering their second round pick #27 for Spida.

Saint supporters are doing their nut on the radio. Threatening not to renew their membership  :lol.
Title: Re: Non RFC trade talk
Post by: Bulluss on October 09, 2006, 05:07:11 PM
Ken Sheldon has denied this, they have enquired about him but no offer at this stage.

Sheldon said they were going hard after J.Johnson
Title: Re: Non RFC trade talk
Post by: mightytiges on October 09, 2006, 05:29:45 PM
Ken Sheldon has denied this, they have enquired about him but no offer at this stage.

Sheldon said they were going hard after J.Johnson

That's almost just as bad. Saints going for pace and youth in the midfield lol. Not having a senior coach is showing.
Title: Re: Non RFC trade talk
Post by: Bulluss on October 09, 2006, 05:52:56 PM
Come on MT, they have to replace Powell, Thompson and Peckett  ;D

Maybe they might take a nibble at Chaffey  :lol
Title: Re: Non RFC trade talk
Post by: mightytiges on October 09, 2006, 06:19:25 PM
Come on MT, they have to replace Powell, Thompson and Peckett  ;D

Maybe they might take a nibble at Chaffey  :lol

 :rollin
Title: Re: Non RFC trade talk
Post by: mightytiges on October 11, 2006, 10:46:47 AM
Fiora might be off to Port. I can't believe anyone would trade for him.
Title: Re: Non RFC trade talk
Post by: tiga on October 11, 2006, 02:05:53 PM
Fiora might be off to Port. I can't believe anyone would trade for him.
Who for?? pick788? :rollin
Title: Re: Non RFC trade talk
Post by: F0551L on October 11, 2006, 03:38:05 PM
Fiora might be off to Port. I can't believe anyone would trade for him.
Who for?? pick788? :rollin

 788 would be to expensive  more like 3 pr of boot laces and a copy of the footy record :lol
Title: Re: Non RFC trade talk
Post by: mightytiges on October 11, 2006, 05:29:29 PM
Fiora might be off to Port. I can't believe anyone would trade for him.
Who for?? pick788? :rollin

 788 would be to expensive  more like 3 pr of boot laces and a copy of the footy record :lol

 :rollin

West Coast should pick Fiora up. I'd bet he would star at their training wearing blindfolds. He doesn't look where he is kicking anyway lol.
Title: Re: Non RFC trade talk
Post by: LondonTiger on October 11, 2006, 05:35:14 PM
Apparently Andy Maher has been spouting off about a BIG NAME player that is likely to be traded, which has not been mentioned in the press.

Sounds like a bit of "look at me, look at me".  More unsubstantiated rubbish on SEN?

Title: Re: Non RFC trade talk
Post by: mightytiges on October 11, 2006, 05:47:31 PM
Apparently Andy Maher has been spouting off about a BIG NAME player that is likely to be traded, which has not been mentioned in the press.

Sounds like a bit of "look at me, look at me".  More unsubstantiated rubbish on SEN?

Bigger than Aker, Tarrant or Everitt?  ???

It must be Miller's Judd for Angus Graham offer   :wallywink  ;D
Title: Re: Non RFC trade talk
Post by: tiga on October 11, 2006, 06:32:14 PM
Apparently Andy Maher has been spouting off about a BIG NAME player that is likely to be traded, which has not been mentioned in the press.

Sounds like a bit of "look at me, look at me".  More unsubstantiated rubbish on SEN?

Bigger than Aker, Tarrant or Everitt?  ???

It must be Miller's Judd for Angus Graham offer   :wallywink  ;D
:rollin  :ROTFL  Another classic quote. MT, you are OER's very own Dennis Cometti.  :rollin
Title: Re: Non RFC trade talk
Post by: LondonTiger on October 11, 2006, 07:52:51 PM
Lets chuck up a few BIG Names

1.  The suspected infighting in Adelaide, Midfielders?
2.  The unhappy CHF at the aints who lost his coach?
3.  A w.a forward who is alledged to dream of returning to his home state?


Could be anyone really. Or No one...
Title: Re: Non RFC trade talk
Post by: Jackstar on October 11, 2006, 08:31:48 PM
Apparently Andy Maher has been spouting off about a BIG NAME player that is likely to be traded, which has not been mentioned in the press.

Sounds like a bit of "look at me, look at me".  More unsubstantiated rubbish on SEN?



I reckon Andy Maher is on the money
Title: Re: Non RFC trade talk
Post by: mightytiges on October 11, 2006, 08:32:47 PM
2.  The unhappy CHF at the aints who lost his coach?

Maybe Browny his mate can twist his arm.
Title: Re: Non RFC trade talk
Post by: LondonTiger on October 11, 2006, 08:34:47 PM
I reckon Andy Maher is on the money


Melbourne club Jackstar?
Title: Re: Non RFC trade talk
Post by: Jackstar on October 11, 2006, 08:35:50 PM
No we dont want ""tissues""
Title: Re: Non RFC trade talk
Post by: Ramps on October 11, 2006, 10:30:20 PM
Well if it is the unhappy player then every club will be after him and we should be as well. Hes the type of player you have to say...you know we have a budget and everything but...

if we could get the polak and 13 for tuck and 26 deal and this supposed superstar is available then our club would be negligent to not chase to get him although in the end it would cost us the 8 and 13 picks.

In the end however if he is available I see the saints getting pick 4 and a player.
Title: Re: Non RFC trade talk
Post by: DallasCrane on October 11, 2006, 10:39:07 PM
I've got more chance of becoming Prime Minister than St Kilda trading Nick Riewoldt.

Andy "look at me" Maher, for sure...
Title: Re: Non RFC trade talk
Post by: mightytiges on October 11, 2006, 11:00:58 PM
Apparently Andy Maher has been spouting off about a BIG NAME player that is likely to be traded, which has not been mentioned in the press.

Sounds like a bit of "look at me, look at me".  More unsubstantiated rubbish on SEN?



I reckon Andy Maher is on the money

Is this related to these silly Macleod and Kerr rumours doing the rounds today?
Title: Re: Non RFC trade talk
Post by: mightytiges on October 12, 2006, 05:29:11 PM
It's rumoured the doggies have offered their 2nd and 4th pick for the Eagles' MacDougal.

Sheesh this trade period is overrating fringe players just because they are tall :help.
Title: Re: Non RFC trade talk
Post by: mightytiges on October 12, 2006, 05:54:52 PM
It's rumoured the doggies have offered their 2nd and 4th pick for the Eagles' MacDougal.

My mistake (and SEN's). Exchange of 2nd and 4th round picks.

Polak should be similarly priced  ::).
Title: Re: Non RFC trade talk
Post by: Ramps on October 12, 2006, 06:41:34 PM
I think the bullies just provided the high price...for our Polak deal. Miller just got another thing to use in the negotiations. Polak aint worth anything more than an exchange of picks in the 2nd and 4rd rounds.
Title: Re: Non RFC trade talk
Post by: mightytiges on October 12, 2006, 10:48:37 PM
Lets chuck up a few BIG Names

1.  The suspected infighting in Adelaide, Midfielders?

Andy Maher might not be talking crap. According to the Herald-Sun tomorrow, the Crows will bring in a counsellor for Macleod and Tyson Edwards' feuding wives. They say Macleod is being pushed further away from the club.
Title: Re: Non RFC trade talk
Post by: Jackstar on October 13, 2006, 06:21:55 AM
Sauce says Gardinier deal already done with Saints earlier this week? Problem was that Ross Lyon wasnt told of what was going on behind the scences?
Title: Re: Non RFC trade talk
Post by: Ramps on October 13, 2006, 10:03:20 AM
AFL needs to do something about trade week its a farce. I believe some level of free agency should be brought in.

each club should be able to sign one junior player prior to the draft

each club should be able to sign one player from another club in a transfer situation with the AFL setting the transfer fee through an independent tribunal.
Title: Re: Non RFC trade talk
Post by: mightytiges on October 13, 2006, 10:53:24 AM
Hudson is the SEN reporter btw...

* Blues and Hawks are finally talking but Thorton still not on the table.

* Blues and Port talking over Russell (a trade for a second round pick?)

* Essendon wants a 2nd round pick for Solomon; Freo only willing to offer a 3rd rounder.
Title: Re: Non RFC trade talk
Post by: mightytiges on October 13, 2006, 11:32:12 AM
According to Anthony Hudson the latest talk at the Dome is the Roos are keen on getting at least one trade done.
Title: Re: Non RFC trade talk
Post by: WilliamPowell on October 13, 2006, 12:29:21 PM
According to Anthony Hudson the latest talk at the Dome is the Roos are keen on getting at least one trade done.

Trade week really wouldn't be complete without North's bumbling trade skills :rollin
Title: Re: Non RFC trade talk
Post by: Ramps on October 13, 2006, 12:44:41 PM
theres still hope we have enough time to offload a couple of our players for picks.