One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: Bulluss on April 16, 2007, 09:39:18 AM

Title: Changes for the Bulldogs game
Post by: Bulluss on April 16, 2007, 09:39:18 AM
What changes do you think will be made this week?

Soy Sauce says that Paddy Bowden and Edwards will be coming in  :thumbsup
Title: Re: Changes for the Bulldogs game
Post by: bluey_21 on April 16, 2007, 09:51:38 AM
Edwards has been looking very classy at Coburg, so he would be looked at.
Title: Re: Changes for the Bulldogs game
Post by: letsgetiton! on April 16, 2007, 10:15:59 AM
imo

in paddy, edwards,jon, king

out  gas hyde tuck sugar(jus say he has the flu)

on notice petts raines richo patto
Title: Re: Changes for the Bulldogs game
Post by: Stephanie on April 16, 2007, 11:06:34 AM
I hope sauce is correct, would love to see Edwards in the side. :thumbsup
Title: Re: Changes for the Bulldogs game
Post by: DallasCrane on April 16, 2007, 06:00:24 PM
It's hard to see how they can justify Tuck in the side. Yes he wins some hard ball but what's the use if you blindly kick it to the opposition.

The game this year seems to be very even, and amongst us 'battling' sides, the winner is usually the team that makes the least mistakes.

On those grounds, Tuck should be dropped.

Title: Re: Changes for the Bulldogs game
Post by: mightytiges on April 16, 2007, 08:01:57 PM
If we wanted to send a message about half-hearted efforts not being acceptable then Petts would get dropped after his game against the Pies. I don't see us doing it though being a goalkicker. Rainesy and Howat are terribly out of form. Patto is struggling but I think we'll persist with him as Simmo is still underdone.

Edwards, Paddy and King would be strong chances to come in.
Title: Re: Changes for the Bulldogs game
Post by: Moi on April 16, 2007, 08:09:21 PM
What about the captain, MT?  Why don't the obvious ever come into the equation?
Title: Re: Changes for the Bulldogs game
Post by: letsgetiton! on April 16, 2007, 08:16:45 PM
What about the captain, MT?  Why don't the obvious ever come into the equation?

he did  moi , see my post

Quote
imo

in paddy, edwards,jon, king

out  gas hyde tuck sugar(just say he has the flu)

on notice petts raines richo patto
Title: Re: Changes for the Bulldogs game
Post by: mightytiges on April 16, 2007, 08:23:31 PM
What about the captain, MT?  Why don't the obvious ever come into the equation?

Using the pill: Rainesy > Sugar
Getting the pill: Sugar > Rainsey at the moment.

The main issue at the minute is we as a team are not getting our hands on the footy. 15 Tigers had just 1 kick or less in the last quarter on Friday night. IMO that will be a reason Sugar will be safe for the time being. Same with Richo. We can argue their mistakes are costly but they are at least getting their mits on the ball.
Title: Re: Changes for the Bulldogs game
Post by: 1965 on April 16, 2007, 08:28:18 PM
What about the captain, MT?  Why don't the obvious ever come into the equation?

Using the pill: Rainesy > Sugar
Getting the pill: Sugar > Rainsey at the moment.


Simple get them to mate and we will have the perfect midfielder in 20 years.

 :gotigers
Title: Re: Changes for the Bulldogs game
Post by: mightytiges on April 17, 2007, 10:22:22 PM
A cryptic clue from Plough in EOTT on who will drop out this week?

Quote
We have some players, who played some very good football last year, that you would expect would have natural improvement, but they’re down on form. We’ve got to make decisions on whether we either look for others to replace them from Coburg, or we work with them in the seniors to get them back into form

Howat, Rainesy, Petts and maybe Tuck fit that description. No mention of senior players though  ???.