One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: one-eyed on July 20, 2009, 06:27:14 AM

Title: Should there be extra-time played when scores are tied?
Post by: one-eyed on July 20, 2009, 06:27:14 AM
As per thread title - Should there be extra-time played to banish draws?


Jade thinks so.....

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sport/afl/story/0,26576,25805971-19742,00.html
Title: Re: Should there be extra-time played when scores are tied?
Post by: Stripes on July 20, 2009, 01:04:38 PM
I think we should add extra time. It's such a hollow feeling at the end of a game to walk away with a draw. It would make for a far more exciting spectacle if we gave each team 5 additional minutes up each end.
Title: Re: Should there be extra-time played when scores are tied?
Post by: FooffooValve on July 20, 2009, 01:41:58 PM
Not extra time — in the great tradition of backyard football, when scores are tied, it's "next goal wins".


Title: Re: Should there be extra-time played when scores are tied?
Post by: tiga on July 20, 2009, 01:49:13 PM
They introduced the golden point rule into rugby league to avoid deadlocks and its working pretty well so far. You can always moan about a loss and of course cheer for a victory but this draw thing...well as a Denis Pagan once said, "Its like dancing with your sister".  :lol
Title: Re: Should there be extra-time played when scores are tied?
Post by: Infamy on July 20, 2009, 01:52:56 PM
Nope
Leave the game alone, we've had the draw for over 100 years, so why change it now?
Title: Re: Should there be extra-time played when scores are tied?
Post by: tiga on July 20, 2009, 02:31:59 PM
Quote from: Infamy on July 20, 2009, 01:52:56 PM
Nope
Leave the game alone, we've had the draw for over 100 years, so why change it now?

Not sure why you said that considering there have been a multitude of changes to the rules over the past 100 years. The game is evolving and it must continue to evolve in the future. As has been shown, the good rule changes are kept and the bad ones are dumped. Its what keeps us ahead of the other codes.
Title: Re: Should there be extra-time played when scores are tied?
Post by: Go Richo 12 on July 20, 2009, 03:00:47 PM
Wayne Bennett said when they brought it into the NRL," whats wrong with a draw anyway?" If 4 by 30 minutes is not enough to decide a game so be it!
Title: Re: Should there be extra-time played when scores are tied?
Post by: HD on July 20, 2009, 03:23:02 PM
Quote from: Go Richo 12 on July 20, 2009, 03:00:47 PM
Wayne Bennett said when they brought it into the NRL," whats wrong with a draw anyway?" If 4 by 30 minutes is not enough to decide a game so be it!

Exactly right - keep the draw, if you're not good enough to win outright in 120 minutes of football then hard luck. I hate the Golden Point and Penalty Shootout finishes in league and soccer.
Title: Re: Should there be extra-time played when scores are tied?
Post by: nahadaman on July 20, 2009, 03:25:46 PM
Draws a draw, two teams who didnt quite do enough to win but just enough not to lose.
Leave it alone.
Title: Re: Should there be extra-time played when scores are tied?
Post by: Beren on July 20, 2009, 03:33:01 PM
Nope. Not until we have a lift in umpiring standards.
Title: Re: Should there be extra-time played when scores are tied?
Post by: Infamy on July 20, 2009, 05:10:44 PM
Quote from: tiga on July 20, 2009, 02:31:59 PM
Quote from: Infamy on July 20, 2009, 01:52:56 PM
Nope
Leave the game alone, we've had the draw for over 100 years, so why change it now?

Not sure why you said that considering there have been a multitude of changes to the rules over the past 100 years. The game is evolving and it must continue to evolve in the future. As has been shown, the good rule changes are kept and the bad ones are dumped. Its what keeps us ahead of the other codes.
I have just as many issues with every multitude of changes you refer to. The AFL rules committee is far too quick to bring in new rules to stop certain tactics and then find themselves having to bring in new rules to counteract the strategies teams use to exploit the new rules. The game will always naturally evolve, the AFL should butt out and stop screwing around with the rules all the time. It means the umpires can't keep up and it makes the game even more inconsistent as it is already.
Title: Re: Should there be extra-time played when scores are tied?
Post by: bushranger on July 20, 2009, 05:40:49 PM
I say keep the draw.
If it came to sudden death we might lose.
So why not be happy with 2 points rather than none if we had a shoot out.
So keep it that same so we at least get some points for a hard slog.