One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: pmac21 on July 25, 2009, 06:17:50 PM

Title: Changes Vs Melbourne
Post by: pmac21 on July 25, 2009, 06:17:50 PM
Out:  Deledio, Cotchin, Tambling, Cousins, Newman, Reiwoldt, Morton, Jackson, Thursfield.
In: Putt, Gourdis, Raines, JON, Polak, Thomson, Connors, Bowden, Cogs. 
Seriously though Putt and Gourdis should come in for someone. 
Put Pettifer on LTIL promote the Goooo !!
Title: Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
Post by: peggles on July 25, 2009, 06:37:13 PM
hahahah...i wouldn't mind.  tanking is awesome
Title: Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
Post by: Danog on July 25, 2009, 09:47:23 PM
In: Putt, Thomson, Gourdis
Title: Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
Post by: Hellenic Tiger on July 26, 2009, 12:55:47 AM
In JON Pattison Cogs Thompson Hughes Polak (his inclusion will overshadow the list of outs as a feelgood story and thus take heat of the tanking issue )

Out
McGuane  soreness
Morton soreness
Deledio omitted discipline issues
Thursfield omitted
Riewoldt tactical issues

and one of Jackson Tambling or Cuz
Title: Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
Post by: Ramps on July 26, 2009, 08:47:14 AM
tactical issues  ;D
Title: Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
Post by: Tigermonk on July 26, 2009, 12:13:31 PM
Tuckerbag why would you wanna drop Rewoldt ???
you need him in the side to cause his natrualy that bad  ;D
Title: Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
Post by: Hellenic Tiger on July 26, 2009, 04:21:19 PM
Tuckerbag why would you wanna drop Rewoldt ???
you need him in the side to cause his natrualy that bad  ;D

If he plays like he has today then the Dees won't get close to us.
Hence tactical reasons he gets dropped.
Always have had time for Jack. Will be a good player. :thumbsup
Title: Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
Post by: Francois Jackson on July 26, 2009, 04:23:04 PM
Tuckerbag why would you wanna drop Rewoldt ???
you need him in the side to cause his natrualy that bad  ;D

If he plays like he has today then the Dees won't get close to us.
Hence tactical reasons he gets dropped.
Always have had time for Jack. Will be a good player. :thumbsup

yep all he needs is help in the forward line and he will shine

Title: Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
Post by: richmondrules on July 26, 2009, 04:28:45 PM
Can we wait for the end of the current game before talking about chnges for next week?  :-\
Title: Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
Post by: tigersalive on July 26, 2009, 08:25:46 PM
Out: Silvester, King

In: Rance, Tuck
Title: Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
Post by: TFL on July 26, 2009, 08:28:22 PM
Gourdis and Connors are both injured after yesterday.
Title: Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
Post by: mightytiges on July 26, 2009, 08:37:24 PM
Silvester and Hislop went off injured towards the end but not sure how they pulled up. Silvester was running after the siren he was so happy. If the Cat misses then Rance comes in.

So ignoring injury....

Out: Patto
In:  Gus
Title: Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
Post by: Jackstar is back on July 26, 2009, 08:46:49 PM
Out -Hislop (Inj )
In. Richo :gobdrop
Title: Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
Post by: tigersalive on July 26, 2009, 08:47:30 PM
I would drop Silvester regardless of injuries.
Title: Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
Post by: Fishfinger on July 26, 2009, 08:50:54 PM
Silvester won't be able to play unless Pettifer goes on the LTIL with Richo coming off it for next week.
Title: Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
Post by: mightytiges on July 26, 2009, 09:22:11 PM
Silvester won't be able to play unless Pettifer goes on the LTIL with Richo coming off it for next week.
That's true FF. You would think Petts going onto the LTIL is a given. SEN saying Silvester will be right for next week.

Nahas - allowed promoted rookie from round 11
Silvester - Richo before and now Petts on LTIL

Retirements (Sugar) can't be used to promote rookies IIRC.
Title: Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
Post by: Tigermonk on July 26, 2009, 09:32:12 PM
Tuckerbag why would you wanna drop Rewoldt ???
you need him in the side to cause his natrualy that bad  ;D

If he plays like he has today then the Dees won't get close to us.
Hence tactical reasons he gets dropped.
Always have had time for Jack. Will be a good player. :thumbsup

Was impressed with Rewoldts game today. Lets hope he can do it again next week
Title: Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
Post by: Chuck17 on July 26, 2009, 09:36:36 PM
Was impressed with Rewoldts game today. Lets hope he can do it again next week

Some might say he has been doing it for three weeks now with goals of 3,3 and 6.
Title: Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
Post by: WilliamPowell on July 26, 2009, 10:22:52 PM
If there are no injuries there should be no changes  :thumbsup
Title: Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
Post by: Jackstar is back on July 26, 2009, 10:26:35 PM
If there are no injuries there should be no changes  :thumbsup

Hislop wont play ;)
Title: Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
Post by: tigersalive on July 26, 2009, 10:34:34 PM
If there are no injuries there should be no changes  :thumbsup

Hislop wont play ;)

He'd be bloody sore that's for sure.  Winderlich, who got on well with Hislop at the Dons, had a few good shots at him from what I saw.  :rollin  Was surprised other Dons didn't go after him more though as he would have caused some frustration during his stint at Essendon.
Title: Richmond Tigers Chris Newman and Jarrod Silvester in the clear (Herald-Sun)
Post by: one-eyed on July 28, 2009, 04:08:43 AM
Richmond Tigers Chris Newman and Jarrod Silvester in the clear
Jon Ralph | July 28, 2009

RICHMOND has cleared captain Chris Newman and full back Jarrod Silvester of serious injury, but is yet to decide where Matthew Richardson will play this weekend.

The Tigers have a chance to gain some late-season momentum with MCG clashes against Melbourne and Sydney in the next fortnight.

Coach Jade Rawlings will assess Richardson's training form today and later in the week before considering whether he plays in the VFL for Coburg or for Richmond.

Richardson, recovering from a ruptured hamstring tendon, is considered likely to play only the second VFL game of his career, against Box Hill on Saturday.

The club faces several selection quandaries, with leading defender Kelvin Moore available after a fortnight out with a calf injury.

Alex Rance was best afield for Coburg on Saturday, so the Tigers suddenly have a wealth of tall defensive options.

Ruckman Troy Simmonds is also available after recovering from groin issues, but should return in the VFL.

Experienced midfielders Mark Coughlan and Shane Tuck pushed their claims at VFL level on the weekend, but may find it hard to break back into the side.

Football manager Ross Monaghan said the Tigers were in no hurry to make a decision on Richardson.

"We haven't decided anything yet," Monaghan said.

"This is his second full week of training and we fully expect him to play, but we have only just started looking at Melbourne, so it's too early to say."

Newman was hobbling late in the win against Essendon, but Monaghan said he had pulled up extremely well yesterday.

Silvester, who had to be carried off by a pair of Richmond trainers, has been diagnosed with a badly turned ankle but could have returned late in the game.

Key-position tall Graham Polak continues to impress at Coburg, but seems unlikely to win a senior recall this year.

"We are happy with the way he is going, but we will just keep monitoring things," Monaghan said.

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sport/afl/story/0,26576,25844346-19742,00.html
Title: Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
Post by: WilliamPowell on July 28, 2009, 06:50:54 AM
If there are no injuries there should be no changes  :thumbsup

Hislop wont play ;)

As I said if there are NO injuries there shouldn't be any changes  ;) ;)
Title: Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
Post by: Infamy on July 28, 2009, 11:07:33 AM
I don't think there is a match up for Silvester in the Melbourne side
I would bring in Rance for him
Title: Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
Post by: Tigermonk on July 28, 2009, 11:20:54 AM
In Bowden,  ;D  Rance, Tuck, Coughlan = farewell game  ;D

Out Silvester, White, Hislop, Newman.
Title: Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
Post by: Infamy on July 28, 2009, 11:30:12 AM
In Bowden,  ;D  Rance, Tuck, Coughlan = farewell game  ;D

Out Silvester, White, Hislop, Newman.
4 changes to a winning side? Suuuurrreee!!
Title: Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
Post by: Tigermonk on July 28, 2009, 11:34:37 AM
In Bowden,  ;D  Rance, Tuck, Coughlan = farewell game  ;D

Out Silvester, White, Hislop, Newman.
4 changes to a winning side? Suuuurrreee!!

Dont spoil my fun Infamy you little girl   ;D :thumbsup
Title: Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
Post by: Con65 on July 28, 2009, 12:08:30 PM
Why do people think Hislop will go out...?
Title: Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
Post by: pmac21 on July 28, 2009, 12:47:10 PM
We must not win this game. Melbourne must not get the priority picks 1&2.  I dont care if we dont get another pick at 18 or thereabouts but WC and Melbourne should be conspired against to ensure they win ?? Interesting to see if they bring anyone back in this week ??
In: Putt, Thomson, JON
Out: Newman, Silvester (Inj), Brown. 
Title: Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
Post by: tigersalive on July 28, 2009, 01:40:52 PM
We must not win this game. Melbourne must not get the priority picks 1&2.  I dont care if we dont get another pick at 18 or thereabouts but WC and Melbourne should be conspired against to ensure they win ?? Interesting to see if they bring anyone back in this week ??
In: Putt, Thomson, JON
Out: Newman, Silvester (Inj), Brown. 

I'm okay with Melbourne getting a Priority pick for 2 reasons.

1. They really are that bad.

2. They deserve one after Carlscum took theirs 2 years ago when Melbourne were clearly in a worse position as a team.




West Coast on the other hand. . . . .    :whistle    :scream
Title: Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
Post by: tigergirl09 on July 28, 2009, 05:27:51 PM
Tuckerbag why would you wanna drop Rewoldt ???
you need him in the side to cause his natrualy that bad  ;D

LOL good call  :clapping
Title: Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
Post by: Chuck17 on July 28, 2009, 05:30:33 PM
Tuckerbag why would you wanna drop Rewoldt ???
you need him in the side to cause his natrualy that bad  ;D

LOL good call  :clapping

I am glad you could understand that sentence.
Title: Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
Post by: Mopsy on July 28, 2009, 05:34:26 PM
Why do people think Hislop will go out...?
Simple-'because he hasn't got it!'
Title: Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
Post by: bojangles17 on July 28, 2009, 06:16:39 PM
Why do people think Hislop will go out...?
Simple-'because he hasn't got it!'

he's got a decent lot of grunt though he should be persevered with , at 20yo he has upside
Title: Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
Post by: one-eyed on July 28, 2009, 08:51:37 PM
In the mix - AFL site

Richmond
Last weekend saw Shane Tuck, Mark Coughlan and Alex Rance all looking good for Coburg on a shocking day for footy, played in a howling gale, but it could be hard for any of them to force their way back into a winning side. The biggest news is that Matthew Richardson may make his return, although he is most likely to pull on the boots for Coburg this week.

Melbourne
Injuries to Liam Jurrah (ankle) and Kyle Cheney (calf) in Canberra last Sunday could lead to changes. Colin Sylvia should slot straight back into the side after serving a three-match suspension. Jack Grimes (back), Brock McLean (knee) and James Frawley (back) didn't play last round and will face fitness tests. Just three senior-listed players featured in the Casey ones last weekend – Russell Robertson, Jake Spencer and Simon Buckley. Rohan Bail, an emergency against the Swans, could also push up to make his AFL debut.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/81588/default.aspx
Title: Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
Post by: Hes My Hero on July 29, 2009, 05:34:21 PM
Just to remind everyone this game is an early start.
1:10 pm.
Title: Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
Post by: mightytiges on July 30, 2009, 04:41:58 PM
Out: Silvester (inj)
In: Moore
Title: Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
Post by: Danog on July 30, 2009, 04:58:13 PM
Educated guess or confirmed?
Title: Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
Post by: mightytiges on July 30, 2009, 05:03:43 PM
Educated guess or confirmed?
Former  ;)
Title: Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
Post by: tiga on July 30, 2009, 05:04:25 PM
Well Mighty is educated so I guess you could say its confirmed!  :lol
Title: Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
Post by: mightytiges on July 30, 2009, 05:16:28 PM
Well Mighty is educated so I guess you could say its confirmed!  :lol
;D

Tonight will be a squad of 25 so the final 22 won't be known until tomorrow night ........

Edit: forgot to add the wink ;)
Title: Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
Post by: Danog on July 30, 2009, 05:24:54 PM
Looks like it's Rance / Moore in for Silvester