Author Topic: Changes Vs Melbourne  (Read 3216 times)

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58595
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
« Reply #15 on: July 26, 2009, 09:22:11 PM »
Silvester won't be able to play unless Pettifer goes on the LTIL with Richo coming off it for next week.
That's true FF. You would think Petts going onto the LTIL is a given. SEN saying Silvester will be right for next week.

Nahas - allowed promoted rookie from round 11
Silvester - Richo before and now Petts on LTIL

Retirements (Sugar) can't be used to promote rookies IIRC.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
« Reply #16 on: July 26, 2009, 09:32:12 PM »
Tuckerbag why would you wanna drop Rewoldt ???
you need him in the side to cause his natrualy that bad  ;D

If he plays like he has today then the Dees won't get close to us.
Hence tactical reasons he gets dropped.
Always have had time for Jack. Will be a good player. :thumbsup

Was impressed with Rewoldts game today. Lets hope he can do it again next week

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13303
Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
« Reply #17 on: July 26, 2009, 09:36:36 PM »
Was impressed with Rewoldts game today. Lets hope he can do it again next week

Some might say he has been doing it for three weeks now with goals of 3,3 and 6.

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40272
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
« Reply #18 on: July 26, 2009, 10:22:52 PM »
If there are no injuries there should be no changes  :thumbsup
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Jackstar is back

  • Guest
Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
« Reply #19 on: July 26, 2009, 10:26:35 PM »
If there are no injuries there should be no changes  :thumbsup

Hislop wont play ;)

Offline tigersalive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2772
Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
« Reply #20 on: July 26, 2009, 10:34:34 PM »
If there are no injuries there should be no changes  :thumbsup

Hislop wont play ;)

He'd be bloody sore that's for sure.  Winderlich, who got on well with Hislop at the Dons, had a few good shots at him from what I saw.  :rollin  Was surprised other Dons didn't go after him more though as he would have caused some frustration during his stint at Essendon.
EAT EM ALIVE!

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98065
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Richmond Tigers Chris Newman and Jarrod Silvester in the clear
Jon Ralph | July 28, 2009

RICHMOND has cleared captain Chris Newman and full back Jarrod Silvester of serious injury, but is yet to decide where Matthew Richardson will play this weekend.

The Tigers have a chance to gain some late-season momentum with MCG clashes against Melbourne and Sydney in the next fortnight.

Coach Jade Rawlings will assess Richardson's training form today and later in the week before considering whether he plays in the VFL for Coburg or for Richmond.

Richardson, recovering from a ruptured hamstring tendon, is considered likely to play only the second VFL game of his career, against Box Hill on Saturday.

The club faces several selection quandaries, with leading defender Kelvin Moore available after a fortnight out with a calf injury.

Alex Rance was best afield for Coburg on Saturday, so the Tigers suddenly have a wealth of tall defensive options.

Ruckman Troy Simmonds is also available after recovering from groin issues, but should return in the VFL.

Experienced midfielders Mark Coughlan and Shane Tuck pushed their claims at VFL level on the weekend, but may find it hard to break back into the side.

Football manager Ross Monaghan said the Tigers were in no hurry to make a decision on Richardson.

"We haven't decided anything yet," Monaghan said.

"This is his second full week of training and we fully expect him to play, but we have only just started looking at Melbourne, so it's too early to say."

Newman was hobbling late in the win against Essendon, but Monaghan said he had pulled up extremely well yesterday.

Silvester, who had to be carried off by a pair of Richmond trainers, has been diagnosed with a badly turned ankle but could have returned late in the game.

Key-position tall Graham Polak continues to impress at Coburg, but seems unlikely to win a senior recall this year.

"We are happy with the way he is going, but we will just keep monitoring things," Monaghan said.

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sport/afl/story/0,26576,25844346-19742,00.html

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40272
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
« Reply #22 on: July 28, 2009, 06:50:54 AM »
If there are no injuries there should be no changes  :thumbsup

Hislop wont play ;)

As I said if there are NO injuries there shouldn't be any changes  ;) ;)
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline Infamy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4426
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
« Reply #23 on: July 28, 2009, 11:07:33 AM »
I don't think there is a match up for Silvester in the Melbourne side
I would bring in Rance for him

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
« Reply #24 on: July 28, 2009, 11:20:54 AM »
In Bowden,  ;D  Rance, Tuck, Coughlan = farewell game  ;D

Out Silvester, White, Hislop, Newman.

Offline Infamy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4426
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
« Reply #25 on: July 28, 2009, 11:30:12 AM »
In Bowden,  ;D  Rance, Tuck, Coughlan = farewell game  ;D

Out Silvester, White, Hislop, Newman.
4 changes to a winning side? Suuuurrreee!!

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
« Reply #26 on: July 28, 2009, 11:34:37 AM »
In Bowden,  ;D  Rance, Tuck, Coughlan = farewell game  ;D

Out Silvester, White, Hislop, Newman.
4 changes to a winning side? Suuuurrreee!!

Dont spoil my fun Infamy you little girl   ;D :thumbsup

Con65

  • Guest
Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
« Reply #27 on: July 28, 2009, 12:08:30 PM »
Why do people think Hislop will go out...?

Offline pmac21

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4664
Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
« Reply #28 on: July 28, 2009, 12:47:10 PM »
We must not win this game. Melbourne must not get the priority picks 1&2.  I dont care if we dont get another pick at 18 or thereabouts but WC and Melbourne should be conspired against to ensure they win ?? Interesting to see if they bring anyone back in this week ??
In: Putt, Thomson, JON
Out: Newman, Silvester (Inj), Brown. 

Offline tigersalive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2772
Re: Changes Vs Melbourne
« Reply #29 on: July 28, 2009, 01:40:52 PM »
We must not win this game. Melbourne must not get the priority picks 1&2.  I dont care if we dont get another pick at 18 or thereabouts but WC and Melbourne should be conspired against to ensure they win ?? Interesting to see if they bring anyone back in this week ??
In: Putt, Thomson, JON
Out: Newman, Silvester (Inj), Brown. 

I'm okay with Melbourne getting a Priority pick for 2 reasons.

1. They really are that bad.

2. They deserve one after Carlscum took theirs 2 years ago when Melbourne were clearly in a worse position as a team.




West Coast on the other hand. . . . .    :whistle    :scream
EAT EM ALIVE!