One-Eyed Richmond Forum
Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: one-eyed on April 24, 2011, 09:01:21 PM
-
Late in the game Jacko went for a spoil (I think it may have been against Pratt?) and the SEN commentators were saying he might have to sweat on that with the MRP.
What did those who saw the game think? Any worries for Jacko?
-
Absolutely. Stupid by Jacko. No defence.
-
4 weeks IMHO.
-
Will have loading so he could be in trouble
Only thing that may save him is it looked like he barely made any contact
-
Gone. I cant understand his brain fades. Thats just dumb football.
Thugs dont earn respect on the football field and he is turning into one.
Play the fu.ckin game Jackson not go around thumping blokes.
Dimma needs to put the hard line on him, much like Kingy last year
-
Late in the game Jacko went for a spoil (I think it may have been against Pratt?) and the SEN commentators were saying he might have to sweat on that with the MRP.
What did those who saw the game think? Any worries for Jacko?
Lol, honestly OE if you saw it mate this thread would not have been started... :lol :thumbsup
-
The replay on Foxtel looked bad, he lifted his elbow and connected with players head. Will get a few weeks at least :o
-
Gone. I cant understand his brain fades. Thats just dumb football.
what Daniel said
It was DUMB :banghead
-
Late in the game Jacko went for a spoil (I think it may have been against Pratt?) and the SEN commentators were saying he might have to sweat on that with the MRP.
What did those who saw the game think? Any worries for Jacko?
Lol, honestly OE if you saw it mate this thread would not have been started... :lol :thumbsup
LOL I've just seen the replay of it. That's a shocker! :P
The vision of the incident is at 4.25
http://www.richmondfc.com.au/roar%20vision%20archive/tabid/11454/contentid/348064/default.aspx
-
Gone. I cant understand his brain fades. Thats just dumb football.
what Daniel said
It was DUMB :banghead
Yeah but do you know what, he actually tried it at least two times before to other players before he nailed old mate.
-
the only hope is that they dont regard the contact that bad, heck that was said with the campbell brown which was fairly malicious...best he can hope is 2 weeks, hello tucky :shh
-
Damn going to spaz at the footy to see, will sit down and watch the replay. Doesn't sound good and we need this guy in the team :banghead
-
With his bad record meaning no early plea he'll get 4 weeks minimum. High contact and reckless with a raised elbow. He should get 4 just through sheer stupidity. As part of our leadership group he's let the side down via another brain fade. It's not good enough.
-
Gone. I cant understand his brain fades. Thats just dumb football.
what Daniel said
It was DUMB :banghead
To go with some of his woeful disposal ;D
-
for someone so intelligent he is so effing stupid
-
it was thomson i think. elbow to the head . how does it go. deliberate, high contact, high impact and clearly dazed the player he hit. with his record will be lucky to get off with just 4.
-
He is gone - deserves 4 weeks. :banghead He wont get looked after like campbell brown did.
Gone. I cant understand his brain fades. Thats just dumb football.
Thugs dont earn respect on the football field and he is turning into one.
Play the effin game Jackson not go around thumping blokes.
Dimma needs to put the hard line on him, much like Kingy last year
Spot on Daniel.
-
Half the suspension will be due to Jacko's past actions. 3aw said you would normally cop 2 weeks for that but Jacko's apparently got a 50% loading plus 70 points carried over from past reports so he'll end with over 500 activation points which is 5 weeks or 4 weeks with an early plea. He's now getting to the stage where he is spending more of his career out suspended than actually playing thanks to his brain fades.
-
I'd get rid of him at the end of the year. Hes an average player at best anyway.
-
I'd get rid of him at the end of the year. Hes an average player at best anyway.
For a 16 year old or a end of first round pick? ;). Jacko is out of contract this year going by our OER contracts' list.
-
I'd get rid of him at the end of the year. Hes an average player at best anyway.
For a 16 year old or a end of first round pick? ;). Jacko is out of contract this year going by our OER contracts' list.
lucky to get a 3rd roundner IMHO.
-
I'd get rid of him at the end of the year. Hes an average player at best anyway.
For a 16 year old or a end of first round pick? ;). Jacko is out of contract this year going by our OER contracts' list.
lucky to get a 3rd roundner IMHO.
Hey don't knock the goods until after you sell them ;D
Looking at the incident again tonight Jacko almost also elbows Nahas in the head. Can you be reported for stupidly elbowing one of your teammates by mistake? :P.
-
Sorry MT ... we'll start taking the pee after we off load him first to some sucker club like North.
-
Getting rid of someone like Jackson would be detrimental to this young team. Guys like him are the glue that binds them together. He's a clubman and getting rid of him would be a bad idea IMO.
-
Getting rid of someone like Jackson would be detrimental to this young team. Guys like him are the glue that binds them together. He's a clubman and getting rid of him would be a bad idea IMO.
Maybe so but why does the club have to keep him when hes just an average player that does stupid things on the park getting himself suspended for games on end year after year. There comes a time when you just have to say enoughs enough ... irrespective of the issue of how he is considered by his team mates.
-
Rather than trade him how about just send him back to Coburg for a while and see if he gets the message?
-
Getting rid of someone like Jackson would be detrimental to this young team. Guys like him are the glue that binds them together. He's a clubman and getting rid of him would be a bad idea IMO.
You could make a case that as a senior player in the leadership group that having him getting reported/suspended on what appears to be regular basis for things that can only be desribed as stupidity of the highest order is detrimental to this young team as well
But fourtunately for Jacko the coach loves him so he is safe
But I have to say that this time round once he serves his suspension he should have to earn his spot back in the team rather than have it handed to him ala what happened afeter both is suspensions last year ... as for his position in the leadership group I agree with gerk (posted on another thread) they should seriously look at removing him from there
-
Getting rid of someone like Jackson would be detrimental to this young team. Guys like him are the glue that binds them together. He's a clubman and getting rid of him would be a bad idea IMO.
You could make a case that as a senior player in the leadership group that having him getting reported/suspended on what appears to be regular basis for things that can only be desribed as stupidity of the highest order is detrimental to this young team as well
But fourtunately for Jacko the coach loves him so he is safe
But I have to say that this time round once he serves his suspension he should have to earn his spot back in the team rather than have it handed to him ala what happened afeter both is suspensions last year ... as for his position in the leadership group I agree with gerk (posted on another thread) they should seriously look at removing him from there
I remember KB & Hafey recalling the decision to get rid of the Whale. KB recalled that the club lost a great clubman and the rooms were never the same. Hafey regretted the decision.
-
I agree with the call to drop him from the leadership group until he can go for 12 an entire season without getting suspended
-
I agree with the call to drop him from the leadership group until he can go for 12 an entire season without getting suspended
agreed he has value but not whilst suspended, he should be dropped from the leadership group
-
Jackson offered one week ban for elbow
By Tim Clarke
SportsNewsFirst
26 April 2011 02:49PM EST
Debate over the levels of punishment dished out by the AFL match review panel are set to fire up again, after Richmond’s Daniel Jackson was offered a one-week suspension for a flying elbow to the head of Scott Thompson.
Daniel Jackson is facing another AFL suspension
Tigers fans would have been fearing the worst after Jackson, who was banned twice last year, was seen leaving the ground and catching the North Melbourne man on the side of the head during his side’s stirring Easter weekend comeback.
But the Match Review Panel deemed Jackson could cop a one-week penalty with an early guilty plea – which will again give critics ammunition over apparent inconsistencies, given apparently light sentences given to Gold Coast’s Campbell Brown.
http://www.sportsnewsfirst.com.au/articles/2011/04/26/jackson-offered-one-week-ban-for-elbow/
-
Well we always knew the MRP was clueless and lacking any semblence of consistency
Would think this proves it
Luckiest bloke in the AFL this week :yep
-
lmao
-
One lucky lucky lucky boy. Rance must be scratching his head about how he copped more weeks than everybody else.
MRP = NFI! :yep
-
Ridiculous.
Agree with WP, hope he is forced to play at Coburg after the suspension.
-
After watching the footage a few times, yes Jackson clips him, but it didn't look very forceful going by the footage, nothing on the level of Browns elbow on Ward.
1 week with the early guilty plea seems about right to me.
-
I was thinking 3 with 2 for the plea - 1 is a bonus.
-
after watching it after the game, I thought 4 weeks
after watching the replay 3 times since, I reckon he basically missed him, and 1 week is on the money
-
after watching it after the game, I thought 4 weeks
after watching the replay 3 times since, I reckon he basically missed him, and 1 week is on the money
Agree.
-
Very very lucky to escape with one week.
-
Very very lucky to escape with one week.
Yep
His record and carry over points should have meant more
But the MRP are nothing if not consistent in their inconsistency ;D
-
Well at least we dont have to see him turning over the footy against Brisbane- should of copped 4 weeks.
-
well they are consistent , last week they said the impact and any resultant injuries were considered, there was nothing wrong with thompson.,..Good decision :thumbsup
-
What happened to the AFL always crucifies Richmond?
There is no vendetta or conspiracy theory, they just have no stuffing idea.
hope he says thank you when he accepts the one week.
-
What happened to the AFL always crucifies Richmond?
There is no vendetta or conspiracy theory, they just have no effing idea.
hope he says thank you when he accepts the one week.
They did crucify us. If theyd given him 4 weeks like they should have we wouldnt have had to see him turning over the footy over the next month ;D
-
Maybe they are balancing out the over reaction on the Rance suspension
-
Take the 1 week and run
-
They did crucify us. If theyd given him 4 weeks like they should have we wouldnt have had to see him turning over the footy over the next month ;D
:thatsgold :thatsgold
:eyebrow :eyebrow
Vintage Flagman right there ;D
-
Excellent result. :thumbsup
-
They did crucify us. If theyd given him 4 weeks like they should have we wouldnt have had to see him turning over the footy over the next month ;D
:thatsgold :thatsgold
:eyebrow :eyebrow
Vintage Flagman right there ;D
May not be gold if postie gets a game ;D
-
May not be gold if postie gets a game ;D
You're not up to speed GR12
Look at the changes for the Brissie game thread
I've got Post as "IN"
:yep :yep
:eyebrow :eyebrow
:outtahere
-
Post should get a game, we need to change our rucks mix as Bris are strong in that dept
-
Daniel Jackson action a real letdown - David King
Mark Stevens and Jon Ralph
From: Herald Sun
April 27, 2011
FORMER Richmond assistant coach David King said the club would be "savage" on midfielder Daniel Jackson for copping another suspension.
Jackson was offered a one-match ban by the match review panel for a high hit on North Melbourne defender Scott Thompson and has a growing list of priors.
"I think this is really disappointing. He has done this time and time again," King told superfooty.com.au program Front and Square.
"The game was virtually over. There was no need for him to do what he did. It was just a brain snap. I think the club would be really savage on this occurrence."
Jackson is a key part of the Tigers' midfield as a hard-bodied tagger, who can also win plenty of the ball.
"He has put the club back again. They're trying to play that midfield group together ... it's just unacceptable," King said.
Jackson was rubbed out twice last season and was involved in a stuff controversy after criticising the tribunal.
He accepted a two-match ban over a rough-conduct incident involving Fremantle's Hayden Ballantyne.
With no close-up video of the clash available, AFL match review panel chairman Mark Fraser relied on an explanation from umpire Mark Vozzo in imposing the penalty.
Vozzo told Fraser how Jackson ran from the interchange bench to make contact with the unsuspecting Docker, who was calling for the ball.
It came after Jackson was banned for three games for headbutting Hawthorn's Campbell Brown in Round 8.
He was also found guilty of another striking charge on Melbourne skipper James McDonald in Round 4, but escaped suspension.
King, a two-time premiership player at North Melbourne, also questioned its recruitment of similar style in-and-under players.
"I think they need to look at their selection. They need to get some players who can damage the game ... some outside players," King said.
But he remained bullish about the future at North. "This is in a lot of ways the year they had to have."
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/daniel-jackson-action-a-real-letdown-david-king/story-e6frf9jf-1226045251041
-
Relief for Tiger Jackson, but questions remain
Caroline Wilson
April 27, 2011
A SHAMED and repentant Daniel Jackson confronted his senior Richmond teammates on Anzac Day morning and unreservedly apologised for letting them down. It was a miserable way to start his 25th birthday. Both he and his club were fully expecting him to be sidelined for three matches.
Having inexplicably hit North's Scott Thompson in the head with two minutes remaining in Sunday's game, Jackson managed to sour for himself the Tigers' first win for the year and break a 2010 vow to be more disciplined.
Jackson has become a repeat offender in front of the match review panel. Runner-up in the Tigers' best-and-fairest two seasons ago, he made the top 10 last year despite missing five games through suspension and more through injury.
After being sidelined for two matches for rough conduct involving Fremantle's Hayden Ballantyne last year - which also occurred late in the game - Jackson wrote on his stuff page: ''Dan Jackson is sick of playing a pussy sport and so is retiring in favour of playing a real man's sport. Perhaps I'll be better suited to the NRL?''
A member of Richmond's leadership group, Jackson - who has joined the chorus bemoaning intrusion on players' private lives - was forced to remove the comment and apologise or face further AFL penalties. On Monday, he was taken through the Thompson incident before apologising to the leadership group.
The good news for Jackson is he has, surprisingly, been suspended for just one game despite his poor record. No need to check with the Tigers as to whether they planned to appeal. His shoulder to Thompson's head was deemed high, reckless and low impact. The Kangaroos' medical report must have been kind to him.
This is just the latest in a strange series of decisions by the 2011 match review panel. Two nights ago, Carlton's Jarrad Waite said on One HD that his backwards kick aimed between the legs of Tiger Luke McGuane was the ''low point'' of his career, yet the incident did not trouble the panel.
Kicking an opponent in that area was considered taboo in Australian football, and the vision clearly showed how deliberate was Waite's intent. And yet the match review panel cleared him, citing medical evidence.
Waite's escape - and his record is not flash - became more ridiculous in the context of last week's decision to suspend Collingwood's Chris Dawes for a game for unmenacing contact with Tiger Reece Conca. Collingwood had nothing to lose, appealed, and justice prevailed.
Even the AFL felt compelled to subtly intervene when another repeat offender Campbell Brown, now at the Gold Coast, was suspended for only two games for a behind-the-play elbow that hit Callan Ward's face. Football boss Adrian Anderson said he would review penalties for off-the-ball incidents.
So Jackson has been one of the lucky ones. And he has - again - vowed to change his ways. Surely he is now coming close to losing the ''out-of-character'' tag usually applied to him after such clashes.
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/relief-for-tiger-jackson-but-questions-remain-20110426-1dv57.html#ixzz1KdicWGuU
-
I love how Journos rarely ever check there facts.
Pretty sure Jackson hit Balantyne in the second quarter.
And I'm pretty sure an Elbow isn't your shoulder.
Stupid :banghead Frekin :banghead Journos. :banghead :banghead :banghead
-
David King = damaged goods.
No refund, no warranty, no idea.
-
I love how Journos rarely ever check there facts.
Pretty sure Jackson hit Balantyne in the second quarter.
And I'm pretty sure an Elbow isn't your shoulder.
Stupid :banghead Frekin :banghead Journos. :banghead :banghead :banghead
Dont deflect things onto the journos - Jacko is one very lucky bloke and on that point Caro and all other journos are correct
-
I love how Journos rarely ever check there facts.
Pretty sure Jackson hit Balantyne in the second quarter.
And I'm pretty sure an Elbow isn't your shoulder.
Stupid :banghead Frekin :banghead Journos. :banghead :banghead :banghead
Dont deflect things onto the journos - Jacko is one very lucky bloke and on that point Caro and all other journos are correct
Very very true WP. Hate to agree with Caro but her article was spot on.
-
well I am :gobdrop :gobdrop
Jacko & the Club have accpeted the 1 week penalty
I really thought we'd contest it to ensure we played this farcical event out to the end :rollin
-
well I am :gobdrop :gobdrop
Jacko & the Club have accpeted the 1 week penalty
I really thought we'd contest it to ensure we played this farcical event out to the end :rollin
Its an outrage! ;D
-
well I am :gobdrop :gobdrop
Jacko & the Club have accpeted the 1 week penalty
I really thought we'd contest it to ensure we played this farcical event out to the end :rollin
We probably should give Jacko another week off at Coburg so he gets the message that these brain fades that get him suspended let the side down.
-
We probably should give Jacko another week off at Coburg so he gets the message that these brain fades that get him suspended let the side down.
Absolutely - he should not be "gifted" his place in the team back, he should have to earn it simply because of how he has let his team down (again >:()
Sadly I cannot see it happening as Jacko is a Dimma favourite so he will be straight back in
IIRC Dimma was quoted pre-season that Jacko would always get a game in his side
-
should be dropped from the leadership group for the rest of the season - had his warnings last year, this is his third strike
weak as
-
should be dropped from the leadership group for the rest of the season - had his warnings last year, this is his third strike
weak as
Agree GG. Need to send a message to him and the playing group.
-
should be dropped from the leadership group for the rest of the season - had his warnings last year, this is his third strike
weak as
Agree GG. Need to send a message to him and the playing group.
I can't see him voting himself out of the group ;D
Actually best statement he could make is to stand down from it on his accord
-
He could blog about it ::)
-
Out - Leadership group
In - Fremantle
-
I can't see him voting himself out of the group ;D
Actually best statement he could make is to stand down from it on his accord
Agree WP.
-
How good was it when early in the 3rd quarter, Duffield was trying to rough up Cotchin after a Reiwoldt goal and Jackson just grabbed him by the head and threw him off?
-
How good was it when early in the 3rd quarter, Duffield was trying to rough up Cotchin after a Reiwoldt goal and Jackson just grabbed him by the head and threw him off?
Haha I missed this what qtr/time?
-
How good was it when early in the 3rd quarter, Duffield was trying to rough up Cotchin after a Reiwoldt goal and Jackson just grabbed him by the head and threw him off?
it's why I love the bloke. He and King are tough nuts that lead the team in the "we don't take $#it from anyone" club. Teach the young blokes to love the club and the jumper and stick by one another. They are like big brothers to a team of little brothers.
Hardwick would be stupid to take any of those two from the team.
-
How good was it when early in the 3rd quarter, Duffield was trying to rough up Cotchin after a Reiwoldt goal and Jackson just grabbed him by the head and threw him off?
Wouldn't be too good if he had another brainfade and got reported again
Fortunatley he controlled himself this time
-
Was great to see.
Duffield was trying to grind his fist into Cotch's ribs, the dirty little c-bomb. DJ just came in and ripped his head back. He has to be careful tho, for obvious reasons.
It wasn't the only time they went after Cotch. I think it was a directive from Mark Harvey. Freo were clearly frightened by the three dimensional class nuggets that Cotch was firing out of his dot.
-
All Tigers in the clear this week :).
-
after watching it after the game, I thought 4 weeks
after watching the replay 3 times since, I reckon he basically missed him, and 1 week is on the money
at days end,the idiot deserved a smack in the head because he's a Dog.
End story! :cheers