One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: one-eyed on August 29, 2011, 06:47:33 PM

Title: Tigers not popular with the Umps
Post by: one-eyed on August 29, 2011, 06:47:33 PM
Okay some here may say "tell us something we don't already know" but we've copped the most frees against on average this year...

                        FF     Avg.     FA     Avg.
1. Richmond     394   20.7      428   22.5   
2. Geelong       425   21.3      435   21.8   
3. Essendon     407   20.4      434   21.7   
4. Hawthorn     375   19.7      413   21.7
5. St Kilda        366   19.3      406   21.4   
6. Adelaide       380   20.0      397   20.9   
7. Brisbane       359   18.9      391   20.6   
8. North Melb.   424   22.3      391   20.6   
9. Sydney         376   19.8      384   20.2   
10. Melbourne   349   18.4      370   19.5   
11. Port Adel.    424   22.3      360   18.9   
12. W. Bulldogs 370   19.5      359   18.9   
13. Fremantle    393   20.7      360   18.9
14. Gold Coast   355   18.7      357   18.8
15. West Coast   414   21.8      357   18.8   
16. Collingwood  364   19.2      350   18.4   
17. Carlton         389   19.5      351   17.6

http://finalsiren.com/TeamStatsSummary.asp?SeasonID=2011&Sort=AverageFreesAgainst%20Desc
Title: Re: Tigers not popular with the Umps
Post by: Dubstep Dookie on August 29, 2011, 07:29:17 PM
I effing knew it  >:(
Title: Re: Tigers not popular with the Umps
Post by: Owl on August 31, 2011, 04:18:24 PM
lol and look at the other end of the spectrum
Title: Re: Tigers not popular with the Umps
Post by: TigerTimeII on August 31, 2011, 07:31:45 PM
Edited for avoiding the swear filter by using a foreign language

Totally unacceptable


Title: Re: Tigers not popular with the Umps
Post by: WilliamPowell on August 31, 2011, 07:47:42 PM
Edited for avoiding the swear filter by using a foreign language

Totally unacceptable


First & final warning to everyone, posting things in another language rather than English to avoid the swear filter will not be tolerated

WP & Mr OE
Title: Re: Tigers not popular with the Umps
Post by: TigerTimeII on August 31, 2011, 09:27:33 PM
Edited for avoiding the swear filter by using a foreign language

Totally unacceptable


was the truth but
Title: Re: Tigers not popular with the Umps
Post by: tiger101 on August 31, 2011, 10:17:25 PM
Edited for avoiding the swear filter by using a foreign language

Totally unacceptable


First & final warning to everyone, posting things in another language rather than English to avoid the swear filter will not be tolerated

WP & Mr OE

haha lol can't believe someone tried that.
Title: Re: Tigers not popular with the Umps
Post by: WilliamPowell on August 31, 2011, 10:28:15 PM
was the truth but

Doesn't matter - avoiding the swear filter in Italian is not on
Title: Re: Tigers not popular with the Umps
Post by: Francois Jackson on August 31, 2011, 10:49:36 PM
Edited for avoiding the swear filter by using a foreign language

Totally unacceptable


First & final warning to everyone, posting things in another language rather than English to avoid the swear filter will not be tolerated

WP & Mr OE


come on lighten up, thats a crack up. Bloody hilarious if you ask me.

自负的人,指自认为很聪明,知道所有事的人
Title: Re: Tigers not popular with the Umps
Post by: WilliamPowell on September 01, 2011, 07:08:35 AM
come on lighten up, thats a crack up. Bloody hilarious if you ask me.

自负的人,指自认为很聪明,知道所有事的人

Glad you find it funny daniel but rules are rules especially regarding certain words (as you know)

Conceited? I think not
Title: Re: Tigers not popular with the Umps
Post by: Owl on September 01, 2011, 08:50:20 AM
conjugate the verb!
Title: Re: Tigers not popular with the Umps
Post by: MintOnLamb on September 01, 2011, 03:02:40 PM
Okay some here may say "tell us something we don't already know" but we've copped the most frees against on average this year...

                        FF     Avg.     FA     Avg.
1. Richmond     394   20.7      428   22.5   
2. Geelong       425   21.3      435   21.8   
3. Essendon     407   20.4      434   21.7   
4. Hawthorn     375   19.7      413   21.7
5. St Kilda        366   19.3      406   21.4   
6. Adelaide       380   20.0      397   20.9   
7. Brisbane       359   18.9      391   20.6   
8. North Melb.   424   22.3      391   20.6   
9. Sydney         376   19.8      384   20.2   
10. Melbourne   349   18.4      370   19.5   
11. Port Adel.    424   22.3      360   18.9   
12. W. Bulldogs 370   19.5      359   18.9   
13. Fremantle    393   20.7      360   18.9
14. Gold Coast   355   18.7      357   18.8
15. West Coast   414   21.8      357   18.8   
16. Collingwood  364   19.2      350   18.4   
17. Carlton         389   19.5      351   17.6

http://finalsiren.com/TeamStatsSummary.asp?SeasonID=2011&Sort=AverageFreesAgainst%20Desc
I would also like to know the figure for free kicks given resulting in a direct goal for and Free kicks against resulting in a direct goal against.
I am picking the positions would be very similar.
Another figure would be free kicks paid against Richmond but no other team (eg rushed behind)
Title: Re: Tigers not popular with the Umps
Post by: 2JD on September 01, 2011, 04:12:37 PM
Free kicks resulting in goals against us would be very interesting
Title: Re: Tigers not popular with the Umps
Post by: WilliamPowell on September 01, 2011, 04:44:03 PM
Free kicks resulting in goals against us would be very interesting

Agree with you there 2JD - would be really interesting, think the other week against Melb there may have been 4
Title: Re: Tigers not popular with the Umps
Post by: Owl on September 01, 2011, 07:14:05 PM
Yeah that has been my bitch, and the trend is that they get them all in the first half, we get sweet FA and then they either put their whistles away in the second half or do some harmless square ups to make the books look decent.
Title: Re: Tigers not popular with the Umps
Post by: smasha on September 01, 2011, 07:16:45 PM
LOL AFL had Carlton as their finals mascot.

Now we know why.

Title: Re: Tigers not popular with the Umps
Post by: mightytiges on February 18, 2012, 08:01:16 AM
Only took the first game of the NAB Cup to be ripped off by the little lime green men in particular No.32 who had no idea ::). I counted roughly 4 goals to North from suspect frees with the non-free at our HF line to A.Maric IIRC directly followed by Petrie getting a free in front of their goal for being knocked by a feather the worst :banghead. They are momentum changes and it cost us being 2-0 on the night. It'll probably be a waste of time I know but the Club should make an official complaint before the real stuff starts.
Title: Re: Tigers not popular with the Umps
Post by: RollsRoyce on February 18, 2012, 09:33:54 AM
Only took the first game of the NAB Cup to be ripped off by the little lime green men in particular No.32 who had no idea ::). I counted roughly 4 goals to North from suspect frees with the non-free at our HF line to A.Maric IIRC directly followed by Petrie getting a free in front of their goal for being knocked by a feather the worst :banghead. They are momentum changes and it cost us being 2-0 on the night. It'll probably be a waste of time I know but the Club should make an official complaint before the real stuff starts.

I agree 100%. It was almost as if the players had been in suspended animation since our round  24 clash last year,  then somebody pushed a button to re-set it in motion, and the green maggots just picked up exactly where they left off. Same venue, same team same result. Ripped off.
Title: Re: Tigers not popular with the Umps
Post by: Hellenic Tiger on February 18, 2012, 09:37:57 AM
Umpires cost us the game against those characterless supporterless effs.
Hawthorn as good as they are and as much as they were experimenting yesterday are a very undisciplined side and give away silly frees.
Title: Re: Tigers not popular with the Umps
Post by: Smokey on February 18, 2012, 06:08:30 PM
The free that was paid to Petrie against Rance was an absolute disgrace.   >:(
Title: Re: Tigers not popular with the Umps
Post by: Hellenic Tiger on February 18, 2012, 06:21:22 PM
The free that was paid to Petrie against Rance was an absolute disgrace.   >:(

Yep considering Maric was decapitated in the play prior to Nought taking the ball off us and and then Petrie getting the free kick for air passing him over the shoulder that would not have fluttered a feather.
Title: Re: Tigers not popular with the Umps
Post by: Smokey on February 18, 2012, 06:56:55 PM
The free that was paid to Petrie against Rance was an absolute disgrace.   >:(

Yep considering Maric was decapitated in the play prior to Nought taking the ball off us and and then Petrie getting the free kick for air passing him over the shoulder that would not have fluttered a feather.

It was almost like the maggots were getting desperate to find ways to keep Nort in the game.  And Rance's free was paid for holding - every video replay from every angle showed that to be absolute crap, Petrie was actually the one that 'held' if anyone did.  At no point did Rance grab the jumper (the classic reason) or the body but Petrie did hold Rance's arm for a period.
Title: Re: Tigers not popular with the Umps
Post by: Coach on February 18, 2012, 06:57:55 PM
Good sides can win games when the umpires are poo. I'm more worried about us leaking easy goals like nothing else than crying about umpires.
Title: Re: Tigers not popular with the Umps
Post by: The Big Richo on February 19, 2012, 07:55:35 PM
 :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol
Title: Re: Tigers not popular with the Umps
Post by: WilliamPowell on February 19, 2012, 08:18:21 PM
Only took the first game of the NAB Cup to be ripped off by the little lime green men in particular No.32 who had no idea ::).

Well it is Goldspinks old number explains it when you think about it :rollin
Title: Re: Tigers not popular with the Umps
Post by: Coach on February 19, 2012, 10:38:45 PM
Cut out the head flick, Kayne  >:( :police:
Title: Re: Tigers not popular with the Umps
Post by: smasha on February 19, 2012, 11:44:14 PM
Umpires starting where they left off last year the cheating maggots.


Title: Re: Tigers not popular with the Umps
Post by: dizza on February 20, 2012, 12:47:33 AM
Yeah that has been my bitch, and the trend is that they get them all in the first half, we get sweet FA and then they either put their whistles away in the second half or do some harmless square ups to make the books look decent.

This is what annoys me the most. By the time they start evening up the numbers, the damage is already done. I hate blaming umpires when we're playing poorly, but for goodness sake it'd be nice to have the odd game here or there where the opposition don't get 2 or 3 goals given to them as a freebie.