One-Eyed Richmond Forum
Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: WilliamPowell on November 09, 2011, 09:44:56 AM
-
Trio of Tiger signings
richmondfc.com.au 9:16 AM Wed 09 Nov, 2011
Three more promising young players have signed new contracts with Richmond . . .
Matt Dea, Jeromey Webberley and Andrew Browne join fellow youngsters Alex Rance, Dylan Grimes, Reece Conca, Brad Helbig and Jake Batchelor, who have all recently re-committed to the Club.
Dea has signed a two-year deal, while Webberley and Browne have both agreed to one-year deals.
Full article:
http://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/6301/newsid/125935/default.aspx
-
Looking forward to the feedback on this announcement :lol
:rollin
:jump
:eyebrow
:cutetiger
-
:chuck
-
Good work on Browne. Keeping him out of the clutches of GWS.... :rollin
-
:chuck
:chuck :chuck :nope :nope :nope
-
The club see a lot to like about Dea.
Webberely will have to pull the finger out to stay on the list after next year.
Browne would be looking at 10 plus games next year or it may also be his last.
-
can someone please give me the explanation of the word "'promising"" ?
If I were them, I wouldnt take a tattslotto ticket again, as they have just won :birthday
-
Webberley and Browne are depth players, and 1 year contract is all they deserve so good move there. Webbers showed a bit off the sub bench but I dont think we will see him again after 2012 unless he goes up a few gears. No suprises with Browne getting +1 seeing as Derickx needs to come on still.
Dea for mine is interesting, great athlete, but I have serious doubts over his footballing ability. I would have opted only for the +1 here as well, but the club must see something they like.
At the end of the day, I figure all are on very low salaries so wouldn't say this is either good news or bad news :rollin
-
All the deals are correct.
Dea has shown plenty to be given 2 more years and Browne and Webberley's one year deals are also spot on for depth players.
A couple of years ago we gave Graham an idiotic 3 year deal so to see Browne agreeing to terms for only one year pleases me greatly and is realistic.
-
All the deals are correct.
Dea has shown plenty to be given 2 more years and Browne and Webberley's one year deals are also spot on for depth players.
A couple of years ago we gave Graham an idiotic 3 year deal so to see Browne agreeing to terms for only one year pleases me greatly and is realistic.
I agree with you except for on Dea, think he has only shown enough to warrant 1 year, but we will see.
-
:chuck
-
Dea for mine is interesting, great athlete, but I have serious doubts over his footballing ability. I would have opted only for the +1 here as well, but the club must see something they like.
Agree with this 100%
-
:chuck
Geez Gerks on a word diet or did you burn your hands in a recent self appreciation session?? ;D
-
I'm OK with these deals.
Agree with most sentiments on Dea. The club clearly sees something in him, and i reckon i saw a couple of things late in the season too. He's got a great build and appears to be very athletic. Im prepared to back the club's judgment on this one.
-
I'm OK with these deals.
Agree with most sentiments on Dea. The club clearly sees something in him, and i reckon i saw a couple of things late in the season too. He's got a great build and appears to be very athletic. Im prepared to back the club's judgment on this one.
Agreed, I thought he showed some good signs later in the season when given a crack. He was shocking on debut but you could see that nerves and inexperience played a big part in his mistakes.
-
can someone please give me the explanation of the word "'promising"" ?
:lol :lol
gee I don't know Jack ;D
Are you talking about just these 3 or all players :-\ :P ::)
Because if you are talking about all players then in Footy terms I would think that Batchelor would be considered a "promising" player, in that he has shown enough to suggest that he will be along term player for us
Ditto Helbig, Conca, Grimes
;D
-
I'm OK with these deals.
Agree with most sentiments on Dea. The club clearly sees something in him, and i reckon i saw a couple of things late in the season too. He's got a great build and appears to be very athletic. Im prepared to back the club's judgment on this one.
Agreed, I thought he showed some good signs later in the season when given a crack. He was shocking on debut but you could see that nerves and inexperience played a big part in his mistakes.
I'm not sure to be honest, to me he seemed to wonder too far off his opponent and struggle to read the play as it was coming towards him. Athletically he is fine, but big signs to worry over when a ball is coming in and he has gifted his opponent 10 meters.
-
No contract for Lids??
-
No contract for Lids??
He's contracted and locked away for 2012 daniel
-
can someone please give me the explanation of the word "'promising"" ?
:lol :lol
gee I don't know Jack ;D
Are you talking about just these 3 or all players :-\ :P ::)
Because if you are talking about all players then in Footy terms I would think that Batchelor would be considered a "promising" player, in that he has shown enough to suggest that he will be along term player for us
Ditto Helbig, Conca, Grimes
;D
Batchelor=promising
Dea = ??
-
can someone please give me the explanation of the word "'promising"" ?
:lol :lol
gee I don't know Jack ;D
Are you talking about just these 3 or all players :-\ :P ::)
Because if you are talking about all players then in Footy terms I would think that Batchelor would be considered a "promising" player, in that he has shown enough to suggest that he will be along term player for us
Ditto Helbig, Conca, Grimes
;D
Batchelor=promising
Dea = ??
Dea = could be anything :rollin
-
Now now fellas, lets just take this one Dea at a time! :P
-
Batchelor=promising
As long as he doesn't get the wedding jitters and leave Richmond at the altar......
-
Batchelor=promising
Dea = ??
So you are saying you actually know what the term "promising" means even though you asked what it meant
That's a relief :rollin :rollin
-
What does 2 question marks = :help
-
Batchelor=promising
Dea = ??
So you are saying you actually know what the term "promising" means even though you asked what it meant
That's a relief :rollin :rollin
Oh WP, what a wicked web you weave! :rollin Tell me, what's it like inside Jack's head? :lol
-
Oh WP, what a wicked web you weave! :rollin Tell me, what's it like inside Jack's head? :lol
Lonely :rollin
:lol
;D
:birthday :birthday
:thumbsup
:bow
:outtahere :outtahere :outtahere
:cutetiger
:juggle
:eyebrow :eyebrow
-
:lol
you forgot
:banghead
-
Oh WP, what a wicked web you weave! :rollin Tell me, what's it like inside Jack's head? :lol
Lonely :rollin
:lol
;D
:birthday :birthday
:thumbsup
:bow
:outtahere :outtahere :outtahere
:cutetiger
:juggle
:eyebrow :eyebrow
Far from lonely in my head, quiet the opposite actually :stupid
-
Oh WP, what a wicked web you weave! :rollin Tell me, what's it like inside Jack's head? :lol
Lonely :rollin
:lol
;D
:birthday :birthday
:thumbsup
:bow
:outtahere :outtahere :outtahere
:cutetiger
:juggle
:eyebrow :eyebrow
Far from lonely in my head, quiet the opposite actually :stupid
So theres lots of voices in your head?
They tell you to post bad things don't they Jack.
Why do they do it to you Jack. Why. :help
-
great move, avoiding the clutches of GWS with three obvious targets :clapping
-
great move, avoiding the clutches of GWS with three obvious targets :clapping
:lol :lol :lol :jump :jump
-
RFCO, could you please explain the rationale for contract announcements?
Why do some contracts such as these insignificant ones get fanfare, and yet I understand Daniel Jackson was resigned recently yet nothing?
If I am correct it would seem to me that the club is only making announcments that will be popular or at least neutrally received.
Surely the members deserve better communication than that?
-
RFCO, could you please explain the rationale for contract announcements?
Why do some contracts such as these insignificant ones get fanfare, and yet I understand Daniel Jackson was resigned recently yet nothing?
If I am correct it would seem to me that the club is only making announcments that will be popular or at least neutrally received.
Surely the members deserve better communication than that?
Jackson hasn't re signed. The guy rules the multi media airways! If he had resigned we would have heard all about it by now ;D
-
The Club rates Dea much higher than most supporters do so that's why he got 2 years. I would say the jury is still out on him. BrownE and Webbs one-year deals would say they need to show something more next year or they are gone.
-
can someone please give me the explanation of the word "'promising"" ?
Dont be silly Jackstar, everyone knows promising means; Edwards, Patterson, Meyer, Hislop, Polo, Connors, etc....etc...we have and have had so many really promising players!!!!!!
:whistle :whistle ::) ::)
-
You're a promising poster WAT
-
Dont be silly Jackstar, everyone knows promising means; Edwards, Patterson, Meyer, Hislop, Polo, Connors, etc....etc...we have and have had so many really promising players!!!!!!
:whistle :whistle ::) ::)
:clapping
-
You're a promising poster WAT
Thanks Gerks...I might get on here as a mod.....only joking WP and OE, dont get offended... :thumbsup
-
;D
-
great move, avoiding the clutches of GWS with three obvious targets :clapping
:lol :lol :lol :jump :jump
what so funny Jack, you just looked at your bank balance or something :lol
-
Personally I don't think Browne is upto Afl standards but happy to be proven wrong. Agree would have only signed Dea for a year not two.