One-Eyed Richmond Forum

General => General Discussion => Topic started by: Coach on January 21, 2013, 11:34:56 AM

Title: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: Coach on January 21, 2013, 11:34:56 AM
Thoughts on these people? Just had a few at my door. Two girls in their early 20's. Are you polite to them eg listen to what they have to say and take whatever article they give you and say "cheerio"? Or do you tell them to FO? I was polite today. They (well one girl talked, the other was quiet) talked about a world government and some other poo. Then they gave me "The Watchtower". the quiet one was pretty hot but she's probably saving herself for marriage eh? Shame.
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: gerkin greg on January 21, 2013, 11:46:29 AM
Used to get a couple of girls knock once a month with the watchtower, reverse on this one, the one that did all the talking was the hot one. I was always polite. They like to shag a lot before marriage. They haven't been round in a while, probably finished school and traveling.
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: Penelope on January 21, 2013, 11:57:23 AM
havn't had a visit from them for years.

Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: Coach on January 21, 2013, 12:19:24 PM
The mods are ruining this joint. Should call the forum "Last edited by WP/OE"

Used to get a couple of girls knock once a month with the watchtower, reverse on this one, the one that did all the talking was the hot one. I was always polite. They like to shag a lot before marriage. They haven't been round in a while, probably finished school and traveling.

Yeah you told me about this years ago.
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: dwaino on January 21, 2013, 12:32:01 PM
What sort of world government were they banging on about? Zionist Occupation Government? 'New World Order'? Back in the day I used to love debating on intelligent design vs evolution forums and such, so I relished the visits. These days I just try and troll them by asking if God is so omnipotent can He make a square circle, and if so can they tell me what it is, or agree with them and have a happy discussion before telling them I'm in the KKK and they should come along to a meeting, or something. Has been a few moons since I got a visits though.

(http://i1264.photobucket.com/albums/jj489/dwwaino/1B64AF64-A72C-470F-860D-19E04F5B0052-22896-00002D77BC63AC40.jpg)

Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: tiga on January 21, 2013, 12:34:08 PM
What sort of world government were they banging on about? Zionist Occupation Government? 'New World Order'? Back in the day I used to love debating on intelligent design vs evolution forums and such, so I relished the visits. These days I just try and troll them by asking if God is so omnipotent can He make a square circle, and if so can they tell me what it is, or agree with them and have a happy discussion before telling them I'm in the KKK and they should come along to a meeting, or something. Has been a few moons since I got a visits though.

(http://i1264.photobucket.com/albums/jj489/dwwaino/1B64AF64-A72C-470F-860D-19E04F5B0052-22896-00002D77BC63AC40.jpg)

LMFAOOOOOOO!!!! That is frikkin hillarious!  :rollin :lol Laughed so much I did a little mouth vom.
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: tiga on January 21, 2013, 12:38:18 PM
Oh and to gerks re als post, I think he mean't "Kingdom hall" and bag limits referred to hunting quotas. But I could be wrong....Territorians are their own breed.
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: Coach on January 21, 2013, 12:44:35 PM
Gods government bro. He and Geez are hand picking the people to form this world government
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: tiga on January 21, 2013, 12:46:38 PM
Gods government bro. He and Geez are hand picking the people to form this world government

then who picked Gillard and Swan? The Patron saint for Comic relief?
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: dwaino on January 21, 2013, 12:49:23 PM
How is he doing that? Writes them a letter? Tells them in a drug induced state? Picks who fiddles the most kiddies?

Lol just remembered the episode of Black Books when Bernard invited the JHs in because he was finding any excuse not to do his taxes.
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: gerkin greg on January 21, 2013, 12:49:57 PM
Oh and to gerks re als post, I think he mean't "Kingdom hall" and bag limits referred to hunting quotas. But I could be wrong....Territorians are their own breed.

Kingdom hall came out a little different, but i thought hey, it's Darwin ;D
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: Coach on January 21, 2013, 12:51:22 PM
These people are like Bojangles. They say their piece and do nothing to back it up.
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: dwaino on January 21, 2013, 12:54:29 PM
These people are like Bojangles. They say their piece and do nothing to back it up.

Woah they crossed the street to tell you about Rancer?  :shh
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: Coach on January 21, 2013, 12:56:21 PM
These people are like Bojangles. They say their piece and do nothing to back it up.

Woah they crossed the street to tell you about Rancer?  :shh

I crossed the street to tell them about Chappy. :shh
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: tiga on January 21, 2013, 01:07:28 PM
The General section on OER today has to be one of the funniest places on earth.   :rollin I'm having a ball and testing out that guy's outsource technique in the other thread with my superiors. I've got half a dozen Chinese students (who are currently on leave from the iPhone factory) building Active directory OU's and enabling radius authentication based firewall rules whilst I enjoy these entertaining posts.  :thumbsup Deadlines must be kept!  ;D
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: Coach on January 21, 2013, 01:10:53 PM
 (who are currently on leave from the iPhone factory)

:lol
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: Penelope on January 21, 2013, 01:57:02 PM
Oh and to gerks re als post, I think he mean't "Kingdom hall" and bag limits referred to hunting quotas. But I could be wrong....Territorians are their own breed.

Kingdom hall came out a little different, but i thought hey, it's Darwin ;D

They call it what they want, I call it what I want.

You've never heard it called that before?

Yeah, Tiga, you pretty much nailed it. I missed gerks response. i am assuming it is on the cutting room floor?



Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: gerkin greg on January 21, 2013, 02:13:34 PM
yeah mate your franger hanger got the snip
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: Coach on January 21, 2013, 02:28:40 PM
This forum is so stuffing soft it makes Y&B look like a brothel
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: tiga on January 21, 2013, 03:04:11 PM
Oh and to gerks re als post, I think he mean't "Kingdom hall" and bag limits referred to hunting quotas. But I could be wrong....Territorians are their own breed.

Kingdom hall came out a little different, but i thought hey, it's Darwin ;D

They call it what they want, I call it what I want.

You've never heard it called that before?

Yeah, Tiga, you pretty much nailed it. I missed gerks response. i am assuming it is on the cutting room floor?

OER's cutting room floor Webcam as of 21/1/2013 - 3:02pm

(http://centralasiaonline.com/shared/images/2012/04/17/kzgar.jpg)
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: gerkin greg on January 21, 2013, 03:06:48 PM
looks like one of claw's posts hanging off the end
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: tiga on January 21, 2013, 03:17:40 PM
looks like one of claw's posts hanging off the end
:lol :bow :thatsgold
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: Penelope on January 21, 2013, 03:18:50 PM
 :lol
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: dwaino on January 21, 2013, 04:24:50 PM
 :lol :rollin :rollin

Best thread in quite some time still  :thumbsup
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: Ox on January 21, 2013, 04:49:02 PM
Can u be charged if you answer the door to uninvited guests,naked ?
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: tiga on January 21, 2013, 05:22:00 PM
Can u be charged if you answer the door to uninvited guests,naked?

Don't think so Ox, but you could probably ask for a cover charge or at least a 2 drink minimum purchase from the Bar.  ;D



Edit: quote edited
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: dwaino on January 21, 2013, 05:27:56 PM
What if you knock on some strangers door, naked?
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: gerkin greg on January 21, 2013, 05:29:29 PM
"Care to take a look over the Watchtower?"
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: Ox on January 21, 2013, 05:35:31 PM
What if you knock on some strangers door, naked?

50/50
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: tiga on January 22, 2013, 11:54:45 AM
"Care to take a look over the Watchtower?"
So that's what Dylan was referring to when he wrote

"All along the watchtower
Princes kept the view
While all the women came and went
Barefoot servants, too . " ;D
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: Penelope on January 22, 2013, 05:02:22 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tWtv1v-oHZM
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: Ox on January 22, 2013, 05:07:38 PM
perhaps, if i had have said, "Soft-on" ?
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: Coach on January 22, 2013, 05:09:20 PM
Snip snip snip what a joke. but let's turned a blind eye to trolling and racism.
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: WilliamPowell on January 22, 2013, 05:14:23 PM
The rules on "gutter talk", "tiolet humour" and the crude comments are pretty straight forward have been for quite some time

Stick to the topic and there wont be a problem
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: Coach on January 22, 2013, 05:18:04 PM
Is that right, chief? Define 'some time' because I will do some digging if I don't like your answer. It's become clear to me that myself (and others) are being targeted and I don't like it. I think the colour of my skin has something to do with it as well!
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: Penelope on January 22, 2013, 05:31:35 PM
 a link to a youtube clip of col elliott that doesnt even contain swearing gets the arse?
 :huh
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: WilliamPowell on January 22, 2013, 05:39:32 PM
a link to a youtube clip of col elliott that doesnt even contain swearing gets the arse?
 :huh

Al, didn't snip your post that contained the the YouTube clip.

I snipped a post of Coach's and that was it.

Didn't touch yours.
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: Penelope on January 22, 2013, 05:42:59 PM
oh, my mistake,
apologies.


Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: WilliamPowell on January 22, 2013, 05:51:43 PM
Is that right, chief? Define 'some time' because I will do some digging if I don't like your answer. It's become clear to me that myself (and others) are being targeted and I don't like it. I think the colour of my skin has something to do with it as well!

I doubt that you will like whatever answer I give you.

But "some time" is over 3 years; since we received a lot of complaints from long term OERites about the amount of "smut" appearing on the forum. Not that you would care but we have lost a number of quality people from this forum because of it, dare I say it FACT

Regarding your comment about the colour of your skin. I am not sure what you mean here as I have no idea what the colour of your skin is so what's your point exactly
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: WilliamPowell on January 22, 2013, 05:52:14 PM
oh, my mistake,
apologies.

To be honest not sure what happened
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: Penelope on January 22, 2013, 06:07:52 PM
its gone again?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tWtv1v-oHZM

now its back
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: Gigantor on January 22, 2013, 07:14:28 PM
Some of the wit and humour here is just soo funny.there are times i almost fall of my seat.
I understand that people on the net have a certain freedom to express themselves far more openly than maybe in day to day life,However in order for any organisation to function a degree of civility is required.I would imagine all of us here want this place to prosper because the reason we are here ,the RFC will also prosper and that is our ultimate goal.And yes theres also the social aspect of this site too.I would imagine a few friendships have been forged through the pages of this forum.
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: Gigantor on January 22, 2013, 07:17:50 PM
as far as religious groups are concerned they are free to door knock my door as much as they want.But i also have the right as to whether i listen to them.I usually let them make their initial talk and then quietly and nicely inform them i dont have any interest in religion and bid them adieu
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: Coach on January 22, 2013, 08:39:02 PM
Is that right, chief? Define 'some time' because I will do some digging if I don't like your answer. It's become clear to me that myself (and others) are being targeted and I don't like it. I think the colour of my skin has something to do with it as well!

I doubt that you will like whatever answer I give you.

But "some time" is over 3 years; since we received a lot of complaints from long term OERites about the amount of "smut" appearing on the forum. Not that you would care but we have lost a number of quality people from this forum because of it, dare I say it FACT

Regarding your comment about the colour of your skin. I am not sure what you mean here as I have no idea what the colour of your skin is so what's your point exactly

If you're going to say that then you need to produce names. I know of a few people who have left here because of what one certain poster gets away with. How do you know these people left, did they sook up (like you do with every post) and PM you and OE saying they're leaving? Whoa, look at me, I can't go quietly.

Considering I have been here for 4+ years I guess I am not the cause of these complaints, wouldn't you agree, guy? So stop snipping my posts when you let other people (with a different coloured skin to me) get away with similar comments. Just let it ride unless it's too "smutty". You're frustrating a few long term members who are considering their options.

In conclusion, some "smut" (by your sooky, soft definition) isn't allowed but hounding fellow members, abusing them via PM and racism is cool on this forum?

Kind regards,
Dave
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: Coach on January 22, 2013, 08:42:35 PM
Why is it that Bojangles gets to call me "crazy" and asks if I am on crack? Bit extreme when we're only talking footy. That's racist and downright disgusting. I haven't reported him but if I did you still wouldn't do anything about it. You only snip what you like. You only snip the posters you don't like. As I have said to you before, just ban people you don't want on your forum. Then all those long term members (they are????) can come back and you can be very pleased with yourself
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: Loui Tufga on January 22, 2013, 08:52:08 PM
Dookie is a JoHo.....he's out knocking a door near y'all as we speak.
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: WilliamPowell on January 22, 2013, 10:08:53 PM

If you're going to say that then you need to produce names. I know of a few people who have left here because of what one certain poster gets away with. How do you know these people left, did they sook up (like you do with every post) and PM you and OE saying they're leaving? Whoa, look at me, I can't go quietly.

Considering I have been here for 4+ years I guess I am not the cause of these complaints, wouldn't you agree, guy? So stop snipping my posts when you let other people (with a different coloured skin to me) get away with similar comments. Just let it ride unless it's too "smutty". You're frustrating a few long term members who are considering their options.

In conclusion, some "smut" (by your sooky, soft definition) isn't allowed but hounding fellow members, abusing them via PM and racism is cool on this forum?

Kind regards,
Dave

I don't need to "name names" as you put it because it is pretty easy to workout. Have I received PMs from these folks? answer is from some yes but from others no. They have just stopped posting.

As for me "sooking up" as you call it; if that means ensuring that posts that offend women/children or are derogatory towards women/children because of their content are removed then I am happy to put my hand up and say guilty.

Whether you want to accept it or not or like it or not the facts are you wouldn't get away with making the sort "smutty" comments that we remove here in the workplace, you would actually find yourself in massive trouble. So why do it here? It's about respect as someone else pointed out.

If people don't want to post or are "considering their options" that is their choice.

As for your comment about "hounding fellow members, abusing them via PM and racism is cool on this forum?"

We have told you a number of times we don't have access to members PMs so we are not aware of what gets said. However, we have made it very clear if you have problem and supply us with the appropriate proof then we can do something but without any evidence there is little we can do. We have asked you to do this on numerous occasions but you continue to refuse supply any evidence of abuse.

Why is it that Bojangles gets to call me "crazy" and asks if I am on crack? Bit extreme when we're only talking footy. That's racist and downright disgusting

Call me crazy, call me stupid but please explain to me how being called crazy and being asked if you are on "crack" is a racist comment? I seriously don't understand, don't see how it can be deemed racist.




Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: 1965 on January 22, 2013, 10:11:42 PM


Only one thing to say really.

Bring on the footy.

Go Tigers.

 :cheers
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: Coach on January 22, 2013, 10:26:40 PM

If you're going to say that then you need to produce names. I know of a few people who have left here because of what one certain poster gets away with. How do you know these people left, did they sook up (like you do with every post) and PM you and OE saying they're leaving? Whoa, look at me, I can't go quietly.

Considering I have been here for 4+ years I guess I am not the cause of these complaints, wouldn't you agree, guy? So stop snipping my posts when you let other people (with a different coloured skin to me) get away with similar comments. Just let it ride unless it's too "smutty". You're frustrating a few long term members who are considering their options.

In conclusion, some "smut" (by your sooky, soft definition) isn't allowed but hounding fellow members, abusing them via PM and racism is cool on this forum?

Kind regards,
Dave

I don't need to "name names" as you put it because it is pretty easy to workout. Have I received PMs from these folks? answer is from some yes but from others no. They have just stopped posting.

As for me "sooking up" as you call it; if that means ensuring that posts that offend women/children or are derogatory towards women/children because of their content are removed then I am happy to put my hand up and say guilty.

Whether you want to accept it or not or like it or not the facts are you wouldn't get away with making the sort "smutty" comments that we remove here in the workplace, you would actually find yourself in massive trouble. So why do it here? It's about respect as someone else pointed out.

If people don't want to post or are "considering their options" that is their choice.

As for your comment about "hounding fellow members, abusing them via PM and racism is cool on this forum?"

We have told you a number of times we don't have access to members PMs so we are not aware of what gets said. However, we have made it very clear if you have problem and supply us with the appropriate proof then we can do something but without any evidence there is little we can do. We have asked you to do this on numerous occasions but you continue to refuse supply any evidence of abuse.

Why is it that Bojangles gets to call me "crazy" and asks if I am on crack? Bit extreme when we're only talking footy. That's racist and downright disgusting

Call me crazy, call me stupid but please explain to me how being called crazy and being asked if you are on "crack" is a racist comment? I seriously don't understand




Well FMD, Billy who joined in 2007 doesn't post anymore. He hasn't told anyone why but let's blame it on a few posters who we don't like! To the posters who sooked up and left via a PM, good on ya. You're probably reporting "offensive" comments on stuff as I write this.

As for me "sooking up" as you call it; if that means ensuring that posts that offend women/children or are derogatory towards women/children because of their content are removed then I am happy to put my hand up and say guilty.

So it is female posters who are offended? Froars isn't one of them, so who are you referring to? Julz? I posted along side these folks years ago so don't pin it on me, guy. How many children we got on here? How old do you have to be to sign up and how many PMs/emails of complaint have you had from "children"???

Whether you want to accept it or not or like it or not the facts are you wouldn't get away with making the sort "smutty" comments that we remove here in the workplace, you would actually find yourself in massive trouble. So why do it here? It's about respect as someone else pointed out.

Yeah, I would and I do. Because I have hardly written anything too bad on here. I have a laugh with plenty of my workmates and I have said worse than "I'd like to bone the johovahs witness that was at my house". If I have said things terribly offensive, show me the proof.  ;) Obviously I have made some average posts in my time but gee whiz you snip some harmless stuff. If you don't give respect, you don't get respect.


If people don't want to post or are "considering their options" that is their choice.

As for your comment about "hounding fellow members, abusing them via PM and racism is cool on this forum?"

We have told you a number of times we don't have access to members PMs so we are not aware of what gets said. However, we have made it very clear if you have problem and supply us with the appropriate proof then we can do something but without any evidence there is little we can do. We have asked you to do this on numerous occasions but you continue to refuse supply any evidence of abuse.

I have offered you my password many times but you refuse to the offer. You say it's an invasion of privacy yet I'm OFFERING you the opportunity to look at the message I am referring to.


Call me crazy, call me stupid but please explain to me how being called crazy and being asked if you are on "crack" is a racist comment? I seriously don't understand

I won't call you crazy or stupid as true as it might be, I will show you some respect. Why when I am schooling a poster with my searing words of truth do I get accused of being "crazy"? I say Rance isn't better than some of the best defenders of their generation and I am crazy? Why is it that some white stuff feel the need to call a black man "crazy" when he is disagreeing with them? Because I think Darren Glass is better than Rance, Coach must be on crack? Really? If I was a woman would you let that slide? If I was WHITE, would you let that slide? I think not.

Regards,
David
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: gerkin greg on January 22, 2013, 10:32:46 PM


Only one thing to say really.

Bring on the footy.

Go Tigers.

 :cheers

Agree

Coach needs a cold donut
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: WilliamPowell on January 22, 2013, 10:50:16 PM
Coach,

The only person that seems to be trying pin anything on you is YOU

I have tried to explain why things get snipped and it's clear you don't like the answers.

I will repeat we have had over time numerous complaints about the smut, crude comments and gutter talk on the forum. These complaints made specific mention that the comments are offensive in particular towards women and that not appropriate for kids - that's what we were told. Are you suggesting these complaints should have just been ignored?

People also told us that they don't want to and shouldn't have to wade through pages of crap to get to the actual footy discussion.

We have told you we don't want your password but you still have the option of forwarding the messages to us. But you refuse to. If they are so offensive to you surely you would/could/should forward them to us? You have that option available to you but you chose to do nothing but continue to conveniently blame us.

Finally, regarding this racism issue, you still haven't explained how being called crazy is or can be considered a racist comment? I said to you before I have no idea what the colour of your skin is, so why now is this an issue of race being raised?
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: Coach on January 22, 2013, 10:57:41 PM
How do you forward a message? Will do it right now.

Not replying to anything else you have written because you've done a Wallet and ignored everything I have said.
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: one-eyed on January 22, 2013, 11:08:58 PM
Well FMD, Billy who joined in 2007 doesn't post anymore. He hasn't told anyone why but let's blame it on a few posters who we don't like! To the posters who sooked up and left via a PM, good on ya. You're probably reporting "offensive" comments on stuff as I write this.
There are former long-term posters who had been with us since the early days of OER who no longer post. Those that contacted us told us they got tired of wading through threads filled with smut and toilet humour. There are others who still post here who complained also. It wasn't just one or two people 'sooking'. 

I have offered you my password many times but you refuse to the offer. You say it's an invasion of privacy yet I'm OFFERING you the opportunity to look at the message I am referring to.
A cut and paste or better still a 'printscreen' copy of said PM(s) could easily be sent. 

I won't call you crazy or stupid as true as it might be, I will show you some respect. Why when I am schooling a poster with my searing words of truth do I get accused of being "crazy"? I say Rance isn't better than some of the best defenders of their generation and I am crazy? Why is it that some white stuff feel the need to call a black man "crazy" when he is disagreeing with them? Because I think Darren Glass is better than Rance, Coach must be on crack? Really? If I was a woman would you let that slide? If I was WHITE, would you let that slide? I think not.
Got no idea why you're suddenly bringing skin colour into this. None of the mods have ever met you or seen a pic of you nor would know your heritage. Respect isn't falsely making out the mods are selective with editing posts based on race  ::). Apart from the few posters we've had the pleasure of meeting in person, we wouldn't know what anyone else here looks like. 
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: Coach on January 22, 2013, 11:13:56 PM
I like how you selectively reply to parts of my post. It's pretty obvious who I am and what my skin colour is :lol
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: gerkin greg on January 22, 2013, 11:23:20 PM
you off with the cockatoos again coach  :lol

cockatoo by name cockatoo by nature
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: Coach on January 22, 2013, 11:26:17 PM
:lol
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: tiga on January 23, 2013, 10:04:42 AM


Only one thing to say really.

Bring on the footy.

Go Tigers.

 :cheers

Agree

Coach needs a cold donut
gerks, while you are out getting coach a cold donut, can you pick me up one with chocolate sprinkles?  ;D
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: gerkin greg on January 23, 2013, 10:48:47 AM
No, definitely not
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: tiga on January 25, 2013, 09:55:28 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08LG2pf4Yio
Title: Re: Jehovah's Witnesses
Post by: julzqld on February 08, 2013, 08:53:40 PM
So it is female posters who are offended? Froars isn't one of them, so who are you referring to? Julz?

I don't know what this is all about, but glad I haven't been totally forgotten.