One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: one-eyed on October 25, 2013, 03:58:51 PM

Title: How did we rate Richmond's trade/free agency period?
Post by: one-eyed on October 25, 2013, 03:58:51 PM
Okay we've had two hours or so plus 3 weeks :boredom  ;D. How did we all rate Richmond's trade/free agency period?


-----------------------------

Trade completed: Shaun Hampson for pick 32

In: Hampson

Out: Pick 32, White (free agent), McGuane (free agent)

-----------------------------


Barrett and the other bloke on the AFL website were surprisingly positive. I believe they gave us a B.

Barrett said Richmond paid slightly overs for Hampson but in the end they got their man which is all you can ask for and he'll be a good pick-up. Over recent years Richmond has recruited well when they knew and targeted what they wanted and got the deal done early.


AFL website's trade period rankings (Barrett and co.):

Carlton     A
St Kilda    A
Coll'wood   A-
Essendon    A-(?) (taking into account they had no picks in the first two rounds)
Hawthorn    B+
Fremantle   B
North       B
Richmond  B(?)
Bulldogs    B-
Geelong     C
West Coast C
Brisbane    C-
GWS         D
Melbourne   D

Missed: Adel, GC, Port, Syd.
Title: Re: How did we rate Richmond's trade/free agency period?
Post by: gerkin greg on October 25, 2013, 04:06:40 PM
If this doesn't get 100% poor yr all delusional
Title: Re: How did we rate Richmond's trade/free agency period?
Post by: tiga on October 25, 2013, 04:25:22 PM
Our biggest coup was re-signing Conc's and Dusty. People seem to forget that. I'm happy with B
Title: Re: How did we rate Richmond's trade/free agency period?
Post by: WilliamPowell on October 25, 2013, 04:25:52 PM
Boring  ;D
Title: Re: How did we rate Richmond's trade/free agency period?
Post by: Dice on October 25, 2013, 04:39:51 PM
GWS and Melbourne get a 'D' ?   I thought they didn't do too badly. GWS added some experience and Melbourne got Tyson.
Title: Re: How did we rate Richmond's trade/free agency period?
Post by: Dice on October 25, 2013, 04:53:36 PM
Pierce Hanley has just fired a ripper parting shot to the boys that left >>

#mummiesboysarehomenow

 :rollin
Title: Re: How did we rate Richmond's trade/free agency period?
Post by: bojangles17 on October 25, 2013, 05:46:39 PM
we played it beautifully, letting fj cut loose with a handful of draft picks continues to build on our warehouse of stars, could not have possibly played it out better :clapping
Title: Re: How did we rate Richmond's trade/free agency period?
Post by: Chuck17 on October 25, 2013, 05:48:09 PM
we played it beautifully, letting fj cut loose with a handful of draft picks continues to build on our warehouse of stars, could not have possibly played it out better :clapping

Exactly BJ why isn't excellent a poll choice ?
Title: Re: How did we rate Richmond's trade/free agency period?
Post by: one-eyed on October 25, 2013, 10:10:13 PM
we played it beautifully, letting fj cut loose with a handful of draft picks continues to build on our warehouse of stars, could not have possibly played it out better :clapping

Exactly BJ why isn't excellent a poll choice ?
I've added "excellent" to the poll choices.
Title: Re: How did we rate Richmond's trade/free agency period?
Post by: one-eyed on October 25, 2013, 10:12:32 PM
Trade bounty: your club's new recruits from the 2013 exchange period

Mark Macgugan, Ashley Browne and Adam McNicol 
afl.com.au
October 25, 2013


RICHMOND

IN
Shaun Hampson
From Carlton Age 25 Height 201cm Weight 104kg Position Ruck/forward Games 63
Official AFL Player Ratings rank 394
What he brings Big men aren't easy to find and, while some queried the price the Tigers paid for Hampson, he should slot in and play an effective dual role for the team as a forward line foil for Jack Riewoldt and ruck support for Ivan Maric. Has shown he is capable of crashing packs and taking contested marks, but needs to do it more consistently. A season uninterrupted by injury would help him do that.

OUT
Free agency/traded: Matt White (Port Adelaide), pick 32 (Carlton)
Retired: Shane Tuck

NAB AFL Draft picks: 12, 50, 68, 86

Analysis: A quiet trade period for the Tigers, who are clearly confident their list is on the right track. There are some delistings to come, with Luke McGuane touted to find a new home in Brisbane, and Robin Nahas facing an uncertain future.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2013-10-25/trade-bounty
Title: Re: How did we rate Richmond's trade/free agency period?
Post by: tigs2011 on October 26, 2013, 01:35:42 AM
At least we didn't use 32 on Everitt.  :lol
Title: Re: How did we rate Richmond's trade/free agency period?
Post by: one-eyed on October 26, 2013, 02:57:51 AM
The Herald-Sun gave us a B- ...


AFL trade month report card - every club rated

    Sam Edmund
    From: Herald Sun
    October 26, 2013


RICHMOND

In: Shaun Hampson

Out: Matt White

Draft picks: 12, 50, 68, 86

Verdict: Put the brakes on after bringing in more than 30 players in three years. Desperately needed to give Ivan Maric support, which comes in the form of Shaun Hampson. Had a look at Giant Dylan Shiel but with nothing to offer and a tight salary cap it never got off the ground. A vanilla exchange period.

Rating: B-

http://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/afl-trade-month-report-card-every-club-rated/story-fnfll94y-1226746839549

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here's The Age's report card as well ....

How your club fared in the free agency and trade period

   By Emma Quayle and Michael Gleeson
     The Age
    October 26, 2013



RICHMOND

The Tigers paid plenty for Shaun Hampson, who couldn't cement a spot in seven years at Carlton. But the fact that the Tigers have recruited well in the last few years inspires confidence, as does the fact they identified Hampson, went after him and got the deal done quickly and easily. Time will tell whether he's the right man. Pick 12 means they'll be picking from the top group in the draft, a group largely com-prised of mid-fielders, and they won't be back until the third round. They were hoping for a compensation pick for White, who had his best season and whose departure robs them of some pace and depth, but that wasn't forthcoming.

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/how-your-club-fared-in-the-free-agency-and-trade-period-20131025-2w773.html
Title: Re: How did we rate Richmond's trade/free agency period?
Post by: Owl on October 26, 2013, 08:39:03 AM
Essendon....el oh el
Title: Re: How did we rate Richmond's trade/free agency period?
Post by: Chuck17 on October 26, 2013, 09:21:45 AM
we played it beautifully, letting fj cut loose with a handful of draft picks continues to build on our warehouse of stars, could not have possibly played it out better :clapping

Exactly BJ why isn't excellent a poll choice ?
I've added "excellent" to the poll choices.

Thanks OE  :thumbsup

For the record BJ and myself are changing our poll votes to excellent/sublime
Title: Re: How did we rate Richmond's trade/free agency period?
Post by: tigs2011 on October 26, 2013, 10:06:05 AM
Lol Sydney A+

Overpaid for Buddy and then lost half a team out the other way.  :clapping
Title: Re: How did we rate Richmond's trade/free agency period?
Post by: Judge Roughneck on October 26, 2013, 11:35:42 AM
Ya but 400+ new membership s over day compared to last season
Title: Re: How did we rate Richmond's trade/free agency period?
Post by: the claw on October 26, 2013, 12:19:07 PM
At least we didn't use 32 on Everitt.  :lol
and yet hes played better footy to date than hampson. i reckon this point is regularly lost in this debate.
hampsons track record is very poor for a bloke whos 26 before the start of next season and is entering yr 8. i dont think anyone can argue hes been a good player and  has the runs on the board.
everitt  is 25 at the start of next season is in yr 8 but at the least is coming of a pretty decent  20 game season something which hampson cant say. hes yet to put a decent season together.

we are keen to put the boots into opposition players who have regularly performed better  but defend to ridiculous levels our own players and the club for taking them.
Title: Re: How did we rate Richmond's trade/free agency period?
Post by: Chuck17 on October 26, 2013, 12:52:39 PM


we are keen to put the boots into opposition players who have regularly performed better  but defend to ridiculous levels our own players and the club for taking them.

It would be worse if we didn't have you to keep us grounded
Title: Re: How did we rate Richmond's trade/free agency period?
Post by: Rampstar on October 26, 2013, 01:32:18 PM
At least we didn't use 32 on Everitt.  :lol
and yet hes played better footy to date than hampson. i reckon this point is regularly lost in this debate.
hampsons track record is very poor for a bloke whos 26 before the start of next season and is entering yr 8. i dont think anyone can argue hes been a good player and  has the runs on the board.
everitt  is 25 at the start of next season is in yr 8 but at the least is coming of a pretty decent  20 game season something which hampson cant say. hes yet to put a decent season together.

we are keen to put the boots into opposition players who have regularly performed better  but defend to ridiculous levels our own players and the club for taking them.

have to agree with claw Everitt has shown a lot more than Hampson has to this stage.
Title: Re: How did we rate Richmond's trade/free agency period?
Post by: Judge Roughneck on October 26, 2013, 01:34:36 PM
yes but we are in more need of a ruck than a average hbf
Title: Re: How did we rate Richmond's trade/free agency period?
Post by: Penelope on October 26, 2013, 07:34:28 PM
minor details, Bentley old chap, minor details.
Title: Re: How did we rate Richmond's trade/free agency period?
Post by: Coach on October 26, 2013, 08:53:14 PM
How is that relevant to Claw's point? I don't think he said we should have traded for Evva.
Title: Re: How did we rate Richmond's trade/free agency period?
Post by: Judge Roughneck on October 26, 2013, 09:21:28 PM
How is that relevant to Claw's point? I don't think he said we should have traded for Evva.

and yet hes played better footy to date than hampson


there is the implication that evirtt being the superior player for us to chase

regardless of the fact we are ok for run of the mill hbfs, yet desperate  prior to the hampson trade to reinforce a weak ruck division.
Title: Re: How did we rate Richmond's trade/free agency period?
Post by: Coach on October 26, 2013, 09:25:36 PM
The stuff is it with you people?


"we are keen to put the boots into opposition players who have regularly performed better  but defend to ridiculous levels our own players and the club for taking them."

^

How does that = "we should have picked Everitt instead of Hampson? That is not even close to what Claw is talking about.

Title: Re: How did we rate Richmond's trade/free agency period?
Post by: tigs2011 on October 27, 2013, 01:02:50 AM
At least we didn't use 32 on Everitt.  :lol
and yet hes played better footy to date than hampson. i reckon this point is regularly lost in this debate.
hampsons track record is very poor for a bloke whos 26 before the start of next season and is entering yr 8. i dont think anyone can argue hes been a good player and  has the runs on the board.
everitt  is 25 at the start of next season is in yr 8 but at the least is coming of a pretty decent  20 game season something which hampson cant say. hes yet to put a decent season together.

we are keen to put the boots into opposition players who have regularly performed better  but defend to ridiculous levels our own players and the club for taking them.
Lol you'd have a 10 page rant if we drafted Everitt. Everitt is at his 3rd bloody club in 7 years FFS. You are keen to pump up every oppo player and put the boots into our own no matter what.  :sleep