At least we didn't use 32 on Everitt.
and yet hes played better footy to date than hampson. i reckon this point is regularly lost in this debate.
hampsons track record is very poor for a bloke whos 26 before the start of next season and is entering yr 8. i dont think anyone can argue hes been a good player and has the runs on the board.
everitt is 25 at the start of next season is in yr 8 but at the least is coming of a pretty decent 20 game season something which hampson cant say. hes yet to put a decent season together.
we are keen to put the boots into opposition players who have regularly performed better but defend to ridiculous levels our own players and the club for taking them.