One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: WA Tiger on March 30, 2014, 09:32:20 AM

Title: Slow
Post by: WA Tiger on March 30, 2014, 09:32:20 AM
After watching our game, the Sydney/Pies, Crows/Port game, comparatively we look slow and indecisive. I hope it's just round 2 syndrome but we moved the ball much quicker...??
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Dice on March 30, 2014, 07:12:38 PM
What ?

 :cheers
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Phil Mrakov on March 30, 2014, 08:40:33 PM
Get Matt White
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on March 30, 2014, 08:42:56 PM
Get Matt White
Nah. Greg is better! ;D
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Chuck17 on March 30, 2014, 09:42:10 PM
 :huh3
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Andyy on March 30, 2014, 11:18:45 PM
I think we're a quick team, but only when we want/need to be.

Carlton is very quick. I think we played at a purposeful pace because we knew we couldn't outrun them. But I predict you'll see faster football from the Tiges in future rounds.
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: the claw on March 30, 2014, 11:44:52 PM
LOL
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Mr Magic on March 30, 2014, 11:58:36 PM
There's absolutely no doubt that we're not a quick team.

We play a high possession game that can come unstuck when teams play 1 on 1 against us and for that reason we are susceptible on the rebound. Teams can out run us when they have the ball.

Not sure where the speed is going to come from because we desperately require players who can break the lines and shake things up as well as chase hard to win it back or win it at ground level.

I'm usually optimistic but this aspect is very worrying IMO.
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Judge Roughneck on March 31, 2014, 12:35:55 AM
Who are the most slow
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Andyy on March 31, 2014, 12:59:31 AM
Melbourne IMO
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: tigs2011 on March 31, 2014, 01:35:56 AM
Melbourne IMO
When you can't hit a target you will look ridiculously slow.  :lol

We aren't a fast running team. When we are on we move the ball quickly. When we aren't then boy it looks bad. We saw both in the one game on Thursday. Carlton couldn't keep up with our quick ball movement in the first half. Then we were slow and just bombed it long and they were all over us. The day we go for the kill we will beat them by 10-12 goals.
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Lozza on March 31, 2014, 07:26:24 AM
Melbourne IMO
When you can't hit a target you will look ridiculously slow.  :lol

We aren't a fast running team. When we are on we move the ball quickly. When we aren't then boy it looks bad. We saw both in the one game on Thursday. Carlton couldn't keep up with our quick ball movement in the first half. Then we were slow and just bombed it long and they were all over us. The day we go for the kill we will beat them by 10-12 goals.
I think our players should wear blinkers so they can't see the scoreboard. We seem to adjust our game by scores for some reason. I understand why you slow the game down when an opposition team has a run on but you don't do it when you have a run on yourself. It seems a lack footy brains is taking coaching tactics too literally and not using common sense
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: tony_montana on March 31, 2014, 07:43:28 AM
You don't need to be superquick. Geelong were never a 'fast' team when they were winning those premierships they had one or 2 like Varcoe breaking the lines and used them accordingly. Same with the hawks. They were/are however very hardworking and move the ball extremely quickly.
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Mr Magic on March 31, 2014, 08:59:05 AM
they had one or 2 like Varcoe breaking the lines and used them accordingly.

Who are ours who can do that?
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: tigs2011 on March 31, 2014, 10:05:47 AM
You don't need to be superquick. Geelong were never a 'fast' team when they were winning those premierships they had one or 2 like Varcoe breaking the lines and used them accordingly. Same with the hawks. They were/are however very hardworking and move the ball extremely quickly.
1 or 2 is all you need though. Someone to scare the other team. We have zero.  :banghead
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Judge Roughneck on March 31, 2014, 10:39:30 AM
Melbourne IMO

No.

Which Richmond player currently in the side, is the least fast
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: tigs2011 on March 31, 2014, 10:40:47 AM
Melbourne IMO

No.

Which Richmond player currently in the side, is the least fast
Matt Thomas
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Phil Mrakov on March 31, 2014, 11:20:53 AM
Melbourne IMO

No.

Which Richmond player currently in the side, is the least fast

Cotchin
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: gerkin greg on March 31, 2014, 11:25:24 AM
Gordo is quick. Not as quick as Greg, but a much better ball user.
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: tigs2011 on March 31, 2014, 11:26:40 AM
Gordo is quick. Not as quick as Greg, but a much better ball user.
So our VFL team is quick. Doesn't help the AFL team.  ;D
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on March 31, 2014, 11:33:04 AM
Melbourne IMO

No.

Which Richmond player currently in the side, is the least fast
Chaplin.
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: tony_montana on March 31, 2014, 05:56:35 PM
You don't need to be superquick. Geelong were never a 'fast' team when they were winning those premierships they had one or 2 like Varcoe breaking the lines and used them accordingly. Same with the hawks. They were/are however very hardworking and move the ball extremely quickly.
1 or 2 is all you need though. Someone to scare the other team. We have zero.  :banghead

We should utilise Deledio better, he's nigh on the quickest bloke in the game. also, mARTIN IS A LINE BREAKER, DOESNT HAVE INCREDIBLE PACE BUT HIS FIRST 20 METRES(2.90 sec) COUPLED WITH HIS KICKING ALLOWS HIM TO PLAY THAT AT TIMES. (sorry caps cbf re typing)Don't think its that big an issue tbh
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Willy on March 31, 2014, 06:22:02 PM
It is an issue. We are slow all over the ground. We particulalry need pace up forward for forward pressure.
Imagine if we had Stephen Hill/ Isaac Smith getting on the end of it instead of Grigg.
It's a big issue, in my view.
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: tony_montana on March 31, 2014, 06:24:59 PM
It is an issue. We are slow all over the ground. We particulalry need pace up forward for forward pressure.
Imagine if we had Stephen Hill/ Isaac Smith getting on the end of it instead of Grigg.
It's a big issue, in my view.

We finished 5th last year, so wasn't an issue...

If we move the ball quickly like we used to, pace is not an issue imo. Under Wallace we had one of the quickest sides fat lot of good it did.

Sydney only have 1 speed freak and that's Jetta. When the hawks won their first flag they had no one really. Geelong only had Varcoe its not that big a deal if the side is confident and moving the ball quickly and be able to run hard both ways.
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Willy on March 31, 2014, 06:36:10 PM
Hawks had Buddy, Cyril, roughead amogst others in their first flag and even more pace in their second.
Syd also have a bit of pace with Jack, Shaw, Jetta, Maglyn, Malceski

I'm aware that we came fifth last year. Doesn't mean we dont have weaknesses.

IMO we are light on for line breakers and pressure players.
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: tony_montana on March 31, 2014, 06:57:17 PM
Hawks had Buddy, Cyril, roughead amogst others in their first flag and even more pace in their second.
Syd also have a bit of pace with Jack, Shaw, Jetta, Maglyn, Malceski

I'm aware that we came fifth last year. Doesn't mean we dont have weaknesses.

IMO we are light on for line breakers and pressure players.

Sorry Willy don't agree with almost all of that.

I think you misunderstood my point - not saying we don't have weaknesses, just disagree that its as big an issue as its being made out to be. If it was  - I don't think we would have finished 5th and 2 points away from 4th last season.

Roughhead as a fast line breaker? Buddy is many things, a line breaker he isn't. Cyril was a small fwd and not a line breaking mid in their first flag. Their 2nd flag is a different story with Hill, Smith and now Cyril genuine line breakers and release players, but Im pointing out their first to show it can be done.

Jack is a 2 way hard running inside outside machine, never looked at him as a line breaker? Malceski's pace went when he had his knee op several years ago before their flag, McGlynn is a clever half fwd, but he's hardly got elite speed. Shaw is I agree.

I agree we're light on for pressure players and that can instantly improve if everyone ran hard both ways. THAT'S the real issue for mine, not pace.
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Judge Roughneck on March 31, 2014, 07:01:16 PM
Yarren is a god dam line braker
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: (•))(©™ on March 31, 2014, 07:25:45 PM
Lids could do the job......if he had a heart
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Lozza on March 31, 2014, 07:39:03 PM
Lids could do the job......if he had a heart
needs to follow the yellow and black brick road  :lol
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Willy on March 31, 2014, 11:36:21 PM
Fair enough TM. Agree to disagree mate.
Roughy isn't a line breaker per se. But he has real pace and will mow you down if you fudge around in the back half. Buddy is definitely a line breaker in my eyes.
Your right, Jack is not a relaese player but my point is that he has toe and can get to a contest faster than most of our mids.

I just think we looks slow atm. We're lacking players that defenders fret to get goal side of.
Lids doesn't use his pace enough, or maybe our gameplan doesn't liscence him too.
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Dice on April 01, 2014, 09:08:18 AM
Lids could do the job......if he had a heart

Haha ! you still angry that your beloved blues got beaten by the mighty tiges ?
Lids has more heart than anyone who plays for your mob.
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: WA Tiger on April 05, 2014, 07:34:06 AM
Want to see the opposite of us, watch the game again from last night...the Hawks...sheesh!!!! :o
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Lozza on April 05, 2014, 08:19:55 AM
Want to see the opposite of us, watch the game again from last night...the Hawks...sheesh!!!! :o
agreed, showed how you finish a team off with killer instinct, the Hawks just keep attacking. The minute Freo kicked a goal in the same situation we would have started slowing the game down and invited them back into the game.
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Chuck17 on April 05, 2014, 09:05:47 AM
Want to see the opposite of us, watch the game again from last night...the Hawks...sheesh!!!! :o
agreed, showed how you finish a team off with killer instinct, the Hawks just keep attacking. The minute Freo kicked a goal in the same situation we would have started slowing the game down and invited them back into the game.

Agree the Hawks have it all over us, how the poo are we to ever beat them
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: WA Tiger on April 05, 2014, 09:12:15 AM
Want to see the opposite of us, watch the game again from last night...the Hawks...sheesh!!!! :o
agreed, showed how you finish a team off with killer instinct, the Hawks just keep attacking. The minute Freo kicked a goal in the same situation we would have started slowing the game down and invited them back into the game.

Agree the Hawks have it all over us, how the poo are we to ever beat them
Live in the past if you want, wow we have beaten them, they are much quicker this year and so far we seem slower.
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: WA Tiger on April 05, 2014, 02:49:19 PM
Gary Lyon, James Brayshaw and Commetti saying we are slow and have no leg speed....but what do they know, they probably don't see many games.... :whistle :whistle :whistle
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Lozza on April 05, 2014, 04:50:17 PM
After watching the Hawks last night and watching us today we clearly have no pace. This is important to break lines and we simply have no players like this. Note to recruiters, pace pace and more pace otherwise once it's one on one we can't make space whereas the opposition run away from us. The modern style of game uses link runners so until we get some we are going to fall further and further behind the top 8 teams.
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: WA Tiger on April 05, 2014, 04:51:18 PM
After watching the Hawks last night and watching us today we clearly have no pace. This is important to break lines and we simply have no players like this. Note to recruiters, pace pace and more pace otherwise once it's one on one we can't make space whereas the opposition run away from us. The modern style of game uses link runners so until we get some we are going to fall further and further behind the top 8 teams.

 :bow
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Tigershark on April 05, 2014, 04:58:55 PM
Slow in the mind.......... :banghead

Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Rampstar on April 05, 2014, 05:03:14 PM
we are slow as treakle and thats just the fact. When you play with a number of slow paced players like Newman Petterd Grigg etc etc. what do you expect?
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Chuck17 on April 05, 2014, 06:33:25 PM
Want to see the opposite of us, watch the game again from last night...the Hawks...sheesh!!!! :o
agreed, showed how you finish a team off with killer instinct, the Hawks just keep attacking. The minute Freo kicked a goal in the same situation we would have started slowing the game down and invited them back into the game.

Agree the Hawks have it all over us, how the poo are we to ever beat them
Live in the past if you want, wow we have beaten them, they are much quicker this year and so far we seem slower.

What facts do you have to back that up, or are you just pulling poo out of your rectum....again
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Diocletian on April 05, 2014, 07:18:20 PM
Yeah watch us miss the 8 this year but hey if we beat Hawthorn again at least the delusuional "brightsiders" will have their irrelevent little crutch to lean on for yet another year.

Pace is clearly a problem..if you can't see that then clearly you need to lift your eyes and watch the game instead of checking your gay phones every five stuffing seconds for text messages from your idiot mates.
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Mr Magic on April 05, 2014, 07:19:21 PM
Fears realised. :(
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on April 05, 2014, 07:20:58 PM
We need two fast and clever HFFs in the mould of Walters and Ballantyne/ Rioli and Hill.
Tell Blair to go and get them.
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Diocletian on April 05, 2014, 07:27:00 PM
We need two fast and clever HFFs in the mould of Walters and Ballantyne/ Rioli and Hill.
Tell Blair to go and get them.

They need to be delisted first - preferably from a club that finishes below us on the ladder. Moneyball!
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Golfprotiger on April 11, 2014, 09:06:31 PM
X1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000..............
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: TigerLand on April 11, 2014, 09:10:26 PM
Not enough gut running.

Not to the level of the opposition both weeks
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Mr Magic on April 27, 2014, 09:37:08 PM
How many times today were we 2nd to the loose ball again?
How many running bounces where we burnt a Hawk off?

Cement leg Tigers.
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Golfprotiger on April 27, 2014, 09:39:45 PM
Too many times....

I noticed on numerous occasions hawks players 10 meters ahead of our guys in one on one sprints to the pill! Please our best preseason, I'm tired!!
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on April 27, 2014, 09:43:31 PM
Too many times....

I noticed on numerous occasions hawks players 10 meters ahead of our guys in one on one sprints to the pill! Please our best preseason, I'm tired!!
I can't wait till we have our worst preseason! :whistle
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Lozza on April 27, 2014, 09:46:04 PM
Hardwick keeps saying our sideways movement and slow buildup is not part of the gameplan, i simply cannot believe this given over the first 6 weeks we have played this style consistently. The other thing which was noticeable today was that the first instinct of players was to head to the wings. On one occasion Martin had the ball and there were three tigers unmarked in the centre corridor but he chipped out to the wing where the receiver went back from his mark. Immediately all players upfield were marked to which the next kick went to a contest where of course the Hawks accepted the loose ball. This has happened week in week out, sick and tired of Hardwick claiming this is of the players own doing, thats BS. I would prefer the players play on at every opportunity and if caught with the ball then so be it. Simply chipping around until we make the standard skill error resulting in a rebound goal is just cruel to subject us supporters to every week.
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on April 27, 2014, 09:48:52 PM
Hardwick keeps saying our sideways movement and slow buildup is not part of the gameplan, i simply cannot believe this given over the first 6 weeks we have played this style consistently. The other thing which was noticeable today was that the first instinct of players was to head to the wings. On one occasion Martin had the ball and there were three tigers unmarked in the centre corridor but he chipped out to the wing where the receiver went back from his mark. Immediately all players upfield were marked to which the next kick went to a contest where of course the Hawks accepted the loose ball. This has happened week in week out, sick and tired of Hardwick claiming this is of the players own doing, thats BS. I would prefer the players play on at every opportunity and if caught with the ball then so be it. Simply chipping around until we make the standard skill error resulting in a rebound goal is just cruel to subject us supporters to every week.
Made the same comment to a mate at the game.  I also said I wouldn't care if they got caught. Just play on immediately at all cost down the corridor and not to the wings. It couldn't be worse than the slop we are being fed with.
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: tony_montana on April 27, 2014, 09:51:55 PM
How many times today were we 2nd to the loose ball again?
How many running bounces where we burnt a Hawk off?

Cement leg Tigers.

Haven't checked the stats myself but a mate told me we had 2 running bounces for the game, hawks 19. Players just not prepared to take em on
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Mr Magic on April 27, 2014, 10:19:38 PM
How many times today were we 2nd to the loose ball again?
How many running bounces where we burnt a Hawk off?

Cement leg Tigers.

Haven't checked the stats myself but a mate told me we had 2 running bounces for the game, hawks 19. Players just not prepared to take em on

Lack of foot speed and lack of confidence.
Not quick enough hence we chip/handball sideways to someone else until the inevitable turnover.
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: WilliamPowell on April 27, 2014, 10:22:56 PM

Made the same comment to a mate at the game.  I also said I wouldn't care if they got caught. Just play on immediately at all cost down the corridor and not to the wings. It couldn't be worse than the slop we are being fed with.

Funny said the same thing too

Said if we make mistakes taking the game on then I'd live with it. Rather that than then taking what seems likes 5 minutes to move the ball 5 metres and gifting the ball to the opposition
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Diocletian on April 27, 2014, 10:29:15 PM
Should've upgraded Banfumbles.
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Francois Jackson on April 28, 2014, 06:19:13 PM
Just heard Matty White is not even in the top ten runners at Port

Gee wizz what the hell is going on at Punt Road

Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Rampstar on April 28, 2014, 06:29:52 PM
Nothing is happening at Punt Road. Absolutely Nothing.
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: dwaino on April 28, 2014, 06:35:49 PM
On second thought, let's not go to Richmond. It is a silly place.
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Go Richo 12 on May 04, 2014, 06:40:19 PM
 We seemed quicker today. It funny how fast you seem when you take the game on.
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Andyy on May 04, 2014, 06:48:54 PM
And play with some actual balls. Play direct football. Put your opponents under pressure by forcing a contest.
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: tony_montana on May 04, 2014, 08:03:43 PM
When you move the ball quickly and play on you are no longer slow :)
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Lozza on May 04, 2014, 08:08:24 PM
Remove.the turnover kings (Grigg/Chaplin) from the side and the results will follow, without turnovers today we win the game. We must be leading the comp in clangers.
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: tony_montana on August 31, 2014, 01:26:32 PM
Told yas footspeed was overrated okay?  :shh

Players haven't magically become sub 11sec 100 metre runners over the past 9 weeks, so whats changed?

Quick and direct ball movement is and always will be king - sure, elite footspeed can be the icing on the cake but fast ball movement will get you to 90% of the journey.

you're welcome
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Diocletian on August 31, 2014, 03:22:36 PM
Told yas footspeed was overrated okay?  :shh

Players haven't magically become sub 11sec 100 metre runners over the past 9 weeks, so whats changed?

Quick and direct ball movement is and always will be king - sure, elite footspeed can be the icing on the cake but fast ball movement will get you to 90% of the journey.

you're welcome

Maybe so but I'd rather have a few linebreakers than none and you still need legspeed when you haven't got the ball.
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Willy on August 31, 2014, 06:15:23 PM
Quick ball movement and leg speed are two different things. Don't get why people think one can replace the other. Both are important.
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: tony_montana on August 31, 2014, 08:02:20 PM
Quick ball movement and leg speed are two different things. Don't get why people think one can replace the other. Both are important.

Hang on Willy, this discussion earlier in the season was all about our lack of leg speed and how our lack of it was a major contributor to where we were at. I always said that leg speed was over rated and what was more important was the way you move the ball.

Last I checked there was no injection of serious pace in the side at 3-10 so i'd say improving ball movement is pretty much the sole contributor of the two.
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Judge Roughneck on August 31, 2014, 08:06:56 PM
Told yas footspeed was overrated okay?  :shh

Players haven't magically become sub 11sec 100 metre runners over the past 9 weeks, so whats changed?

Quick and direct ball movement is and always will be king - sure, elite footspeed can be the icing on the cake but fast ball movement will get you to 90% of the journey.

you're welcome

Yeah nah

Still reckon there's a spot for a Alen Christiansen or yarren

In the spot of an Anglo Saxon plodder
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: tony_montana on August 31, 2014, 08:14:09 PM
Told yas footspeed was overrated okay?  :shh

Players haven't magically become sub 11sec 100 metre runners over the past 9 weeks, so whats changed?

Quick and direct ball movement is and always will be king - sure, elite footspeed can be the icing on the cake but fast ball movement will get you to 90% of the journey.

you're welcome

Yeah nah

Still reckon there's a spot for a Alen Christiansen or yarren

In the spot of an Anglo Saxon plodder

Of course there is you silly prick - I never said plodders only  - like I said in my bump post - 90% ball movement - elite legspeed is the icing on the cake
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Willy on August 31, 2014, 08:42:50 PM
Quick ball movement and leg speed are two different things. Don't get why people think one can replace the other. Both are important.

Hang on Willy, this discussion earlier in the season was all about our lack of leg speed and how our lack of it was a major contributor to where we were at. I always said that leg speed was over rated and what was more important was the way you move the ball.

Last I checked there was no injection of serious pace in the side at 3-10 so i'd say improving ball movement is pretty much the sole contributor of the two.

I agree that quicker ball movement has been a catalyst for our turnaround.  But that doesn't mean we wouldn't be even better with greater leg speed. My point is that both are important and one cannot mask the other. When Hawthorn are exposed they are exposed through their lack of leg speed in the guts, ie. Geelong's first half on the weekend.
If Cotch had a bit more toe he might have caught Hannebury instead of being resigned to shoving him as he kicked.
Line-breakers are important and we need more of them.
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Stalin on June 21, 2015, 09:46:43 PM
Looked pretty slow last game

More so when a team like wce plays the press high and  with intelligences
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Chuck17 on June 21, 2015, 09:47:45 PM
 :facepalm
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Stalin on June 21, 2015, 09:49:33 PM
:facepalm

Are we one of the quicker sides  :huh

Looked out of options for breaking down the defensive tactics for mine.

Not fast enough to run though itnot skilled enough to kick to the other side
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: WA Tiger on June 21, 2015, 11:48:37 PM
:facepalm

 ;) :lol
Title: Re: Slow
Post by: Stalin on June 22, 2015, 12:29:42 AM
Remove.the turnover kings (Grigg/Chaplin) from the side and the results will follow, without turnovers today we win the game. We must be leading the comp in clangers.

They also happen to be the least fast