One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: Golfprotiger on May 27, 2014, 08:20:48 PM

Title: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: Golfprotiger on May 27, 2014, 08:20:48 PM
Could he be useful, if we saved our pennies?
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: Phil Mrakov on May 27, 2014, 08:25:24 PM
Not worth what he wants
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: bojangles17 on May 27, 2014, 08:29:05 PM
Such is their dearth of key defenders batchelor/grimes/helbig would prove tempting  :shh
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: Phil Mrakov on May 27, 2014, 08:33:30 PM
Such is their dearth of key defenders batchelor/grimes/helbig would prove tempting  :shh
would it be a 'shrewd' pickup !
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: Loui Tufga on May 27, 2014, 08:43:45 PM
And what does he want exactly Mrackoff?
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: the claw on May 27, 2014, 08:47:24 PM
Such is their dearth of key defenders batchelor/grimes/helbig would prove tempting  :shh
your  taking the pee arent ya bo. would be great if you actually named a key defender or for that matter a proven solid player at least.

while most have sung camerons praises ive held my tongue on him. i reckon hes exceptionally lazy talented yes. im waiting to see which way this lad goes. reckon his role is not so much as a big kpf but more as a taller  jack gunston just my thinking on him atm.

and no im not calling him a dud i think he will be a pretty decent player if he can get over himself and extract the digit.
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: Chuck17 on May 27, 2014, 08:50:05 PM
Such is their dearth of key defenders batchelor/grimes/helbig would prove tempting  :shh
your  taking the pee arent ya bo. would be great if you actually named a key defender or for that matter a proven solid player at least.

while most have sung camerons praises ive held my tongue on him. i reckon hes exceptionally lazy talented yes. im waiting to see which way this lad goes. reckon his role is not so much as a big kpf but more as a taller  jack gunston just my thinking on him atm.

and no im not calling him a dud i think he will be a pretty decent player if he can get over himself and extract the digit.

I have also highlighted how lazy he is in the past, doesn't hardly put any defensive pressure on and looks to sook it up when things don't go his way
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: Chuck17 on May 27, 2014, 08:51:01 PM
And what does he want exactly Mrackoff?

Media reckons a million per season but I doubt that
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: big tone on May 27, 2014, 09:01:25 PM
Waiting for the same old people to say "we will have him as long as we don't pay overs"
Makes me want to punch someone in the face!  :banghead
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: tony_montana on May 27, 2014, 09:17:11 PM
Him and jack in the same fwd line= premiership contenders
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: bojangles17 on May 27, 2014, 09:25:31 PM
Agreed
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: Phil Mrakov on May 27, 2014, 09:27:57 PM
And what does he want exactly Mrackoff?
squillions
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: Diocletian on May 27, 2014, 09:33:43 PM
Next Carey. Get.
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: big tone on May 27, 2014, 09:41:51 PM
I'd trade Vickory and Griff out to start with. That would free up some cash and we wouldn't have to watch either of those pea hearts again in a Tigers jumper.
Vickory would get us a late first rounder and loose about $350/400k a year and griff would get us a second rounder and loose about $300k a year too.
We would have our first pick also, so surely we could get a deal done.
At the end of the day it might cost us an extra 300k

Also considering we have Elton and McBean in the wings, we could afford to loose those two..

I can only dream
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: Eat_em_Alive on May 27, 2014, 09:45:01 PM
I want..
But at what cost? Contracted till end of next season and media talking him up like hes worth a mil a season?  :-\
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: big tone on May 27, 2014, 09:59:54 PM
I want..
But at what cost? Contracted till end of next season and media talking him up like hes worth a mil a season?  :-\
Potentially he is. That's a chance someone will take and it will pay off IMO.
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: TigerMonk on May 27, 2014, 10:00:05 PM
no thanks, Blood our own players fresh from draft
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: big tone on May 27, 2014, 10:02:37 PM
no thanks, Blood our own players fresh from draft
How has that been going for us?
Our drafting is putrid and our development not much better.
I guess if we all cross our fingers that might help  :thumbsup
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: tiga on May 27, 2014, 10:04:03 PM
Cameron is a bit of a one trick pony that most teams have worked out how to stop. Doesn't respond well to close marking and double teaming.

Our money is better spent elsewhere
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: big tone on May 27, 2014, 10:16:52 PM
Cameron is a bit of a one trick pony that most teams have worked out how to stop. Doesn't respond well to close marking and double teaming.

Our money is better spent elsewhere
He doesn't respond well to "double teaming"  :lol
Who does? Isn't he still about 20 years old?
"One trick pony".. He is anything but.
Not having the greatest season to date but almost won a Coleman Medal last year in his second season.
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: TigerMonk on May 27, 2014, 10:17:20 PM
no thanks, Blood our own players fresh from draft
How has that been going for us?
Our drafting is putrid and our development not much better.
I guess if we all cross our fingers that might help  :thumbsup

cause no-one that we had down there the last 30 years knew how to work with young footballers & take them to the next levels. now if we had some good assistant coaches & a good head coach like we got now. then l see progress in players like Griffiths, Vlossy, Conca, Ellis, Morris, Lennon,  Martin, Cotchin, Deledio, Rewoldt, Rance, Grimes, Astbury, you saying they aint some we blooded including ones l missed 
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: Penelope on May 27, 2014, 10:28:07 PM
Cameron is a bit of a one trick pony that most teams have worked out how to stop. Doesn't respond well to close marking and double teaming.

Our money is better spent elsewhere
He doesn't respond well to "double teaming"  :lol
Who does? Isn't he still about 20 years old?
"One trick pony".. He is anything but.
Not having the greatest season to date but almost won a Coleman Medal last year in his second season.
if our development is not much better than putrid what's the point in paying a 20 year old big money, as we will only stuff him up as a player?
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: big tone on May 27, 2014, 10:34:58 PM
no thanks, Blood our own players fresh from draft
How has that been going for us?
Our drafting is putrid and our development not much better.
I guess if we all cross our fingers that might help  :thumbsup

cause no-one that we had down there the last 30 years knew how to work with young footballers & take them to the next levels. now if we had some good assistant coaches & a good head coach like we got now. then l see progress in players like Griffiths, Vlossy, Conca, Ellis, Morris, Lennon,  Martin, Cotchin, Deledio, Rewoldt, Rance, Grimes, Astbury, you saying they aint some we blooded including ones l missed
Let's be honest here- the only decent players out of that group are first round draft picks- Vlossy, Conca, Ellis, Lennon, Martin, Cotch, Lids, Rewoldt, Rance,
These blokes are going to play good footy wherever they get drafted. Don't kid yourself. I wouldn't give Richmond to much credit for their development.
The others, Griffiths, Morris, Grimes and Astbury are hardly A graders. It's taken Griff and Astbury 4 years to break into the team on a regular basis.
Where is the development of the other 20 odd blokes we drafted with those first rounders??
Even the good sides with great culture need help with getting their list competitive by recruiting stars in. Look at Sydney in the last two years- two bloody stars recruited in.
It's time to keep up Richmond, you are getting left behind. Preying and hoping ain't going to get it done.
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: big tone on May 27, 2014, 10:42:51 PM
Cameron is a bit of a one trick pony that most teams have worked out how to stop. Doesn't respond well to close marking and double teaming.

Our money is better spent elsewhere
He doesn't respond well to "double teaming"  :lol
Who does? Isn't he still about 20 years old?
"One trick pony".. He is anything but.
Not having the greatest season to date but almost won a Coleman Medal last year in his second season.
if our development is not much better than putrid what's the point in paying a 20 year old big money, as we will only stuff him up as a player?
What?
Good players are good players. They will develop wherever they are. It's natural to them.
Development is for players that are not stars when they are drafted.
Do you give Richmond credit for the development of Cotch, Lids and Martin? They would be stars if they were drafted anywhere.
It's one thing to not want Cameron but to say he is a one trick pony at age 20 and he is no good when he is  double teamed is stupid.
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: tony_montana on May 27, 2014, 11:11:19 PM
I want..
But at what cost? Contracted till end of next season and media talking him up like hes worth a mil a season?  :-\
Potentially he is. That's a chance someone will take and it will pay off IMO.

Hes worth it for mine, you build teams around players like him. Given he loves to roam, Jack playing deep and Cameron roaming just fits perfectly for mine. Then you don't have to give 2 poos about whether a Griff or TV will finally 'fingers crossed, please I beg you' step up.

our 1st round pick and TV or Griff for Cameron. They'd laugh at that though unless TV starts showing something in the ruck
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: Judge Roughneck on May 28, 2014, 05:02:10 AM
Fits the bits fish

Doesn't have to play vs rance
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: Beans on May 28, 2014, 09:11:28 AM
no thanks, Blood our own players fresh from draft
How has that been going for us?
Our drafting is putrid and our development not much better.
I guess if we all cross our fingers that might help  :thumbsup

cause no-one that we had down there the last 30 years knew how to work with young footballers & take them to the next levels. now if we had some good assistant coaches & a good head coach like we got now. then l see progress in players like Griffiths, Vlossy, Conca, Ellis, Morris, Lennon,  Martin, Cotchin, Deledio, Rewoldt, Rance, Grimes, Astbury, you saying they aint some we blooded including ones l missed
Let's be honest here- the only decent players out of that group are first round draft picks- Vlossy, Conca, Ellis, Lennon, Martin, Cotch, Lids, Rewoldt, Rance,
These blokes are going to play good footy wherever they get drafted. Don't kid yourself. I wouldn't give Richmond to much credit for their development.
The others, Griffiths, Morris, Grimes and Astbury are hardly A graders. It's taken Griff and Astbury 4 years to break into the team on a regular basis.
Where is the development of the other 20 odd blokes we drafted with those first rounders??
Even the good sides with great culture need help with getting their list competitive by recruiting stars in. Look at Sydney in the last two years- two bloody stars recruited in.
It's time to keep up Richmond, you are getting left behind. Preying and hoping ain't going to get it done.
[/quote
Take the blinkers off Tone. How about Madonna, Grimes and Dea from last week? Two picks in the 40's and a PSD? Astbury not an A grader? Our best defender with some big scalps this year until he went down.
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: Penelope on May 28, 2014, 09:33:28 AM
Cameron is a bit of a one trick pony that most teams have worked out how to stop. Doesn't respond well to close marking and double teaming.

Our money is better spent elsewhere
He doesn't respond well to "double teaming"  :lol
Who does? Isn't he still about 20 years old?
"One trick pony".. He is anything but.
Not having the greatest season to date but almost won a Coleman Medal last year in his second season.
if our development is not much better than putrid what's the point in paying a 20 year old big money, as we will only stuff him up as a player?
What?
Good players are good players. They will develop wherever they are. It's natural to them.
Development is for players that are not stars when they are drafted.
Do you give Richmond credit for the development of Cotch, Lids and Martin? They would be stars if they were drafted anywhere.
It's one thing to not want Cameron but to say he is a one trick pony at age 20 and he is no good when he is  double teamed is stupid.

I did not mention anything about being a one trick pony or when double teamed

On one hand you tell us that our drafting and development is putrid, so therefore we should trade for a first round draft pick that still needs developing, rather than go through the draft and develop our own.  Whats the point of that if we cant develop?

but you then go on to say that a good player will become a good player regardless of development and then list 9 of our first round draft picks from recent times that are good players

So unless you believe we could get cameron without giving up a first round draft pick, you a chasing your tail.
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: cub on May 28, 2014, 11:46:02 AM
We should have the money, chase a big fish for once tigers and show me you're serious like you ask of me over and over again!
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on May 28, 2014, 11:56:07 AM
Dud. Delist (from GWS).  Then come to where all the other duds are.... :gotigers
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: MADTIGER2010 on May 28, 2014, 01:20:18 PM
I don't agree with trying to poach players unless they aren't getting much of a run at the current club.
GWS need him a lot more than us and the game of footy needs him at GWS.
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: Judge Roughneck on May 28, 2014, 01:46:53 PM
Boyd \ Patton \ Cameron is selfish and we should have one
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: tony_montana on May 28, 2014, 02:08:37 PM
Boyd \ Patton \ Cameron is selfish and we should have one

 :yep
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: Diocletian on May 28, 2014, 02:21:29 PM
I don't agree with trying to poach players unless they aren't getting much of a run at the current club.
GWS need him a lot more than us and the game of footy needs him at GWS.

What bollocks....it's exactly that kind of thinking that holds us back.

....and footy doesn't need GWS period. In fact it'd be better off without them.

Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: lamington on May 28, 2014, 02:26:55 PM
Boyd \ Patton \ Cameron is selfish and we should have one

I'd be happy with one of the 3 you just mentioned. Actually maybe not Patton due to injury history.
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: Mr Magic on May 28, 2014, 02:38:14 PM
GWS need him a lot more than us and the game of footy needs him at GWS.

 :facepalm
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: 🏅Dooks on May 28, 2014, 02:47:04 PM
I don't agree with trying to poach players unless they aren't getting much of a run at the current club.
GWS need him a lot more than us and the game of footy needs him at GWS.

 :gobdrop
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on May 28, 2014, 03:01:54 PM
I don't agree with trying to poach players unless they aren't getting much of a run at the current club.
GWS need him a lot more than us and the game of footy needs him at GWS.
:gobdrop :gobdrop :gobdrop :gobdrop :gobdrop :gobdrop :gobdrop
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: Andyy on May 28, 2014, 04:18:53 PM
I want a power forward. Not another 'lean' key forward.
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: Diocletian on May 28, 2014, 04:53:46 PM
I want a power forward. Not another 'lean' key forward.

(http://www.gwsgiants.com.au/staticfile/AFL%20Tenant/GWSGiants/Images/news%20images/BoydGIANTSSLIDER.jpg)

So which one is the "lean" one?
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: Chuck17 on May 28, 2014, 05:10:21 PM
Dunno about lean but they all look at bit special, are trying to look tough?
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: bojangles17 on May 28, 2014, 07:14:48 PM
I don't agree with trying to poach players unless they aren't getting much of a run at the current club.
GWS need him a lot more than us and the game of footy needs him at GWS.
I'm a RFC supporter first second and third, couldn't give a stuff if gws need him, we should craft a bid to get him home , dead set gun , put him in a good environment and he d be even better  :clapping
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: yellowandback on May 28, 2014, 07:47:24 PM
Jono Patton has a hairline like a werewolf, awwwwooooooooooohhhhhhhhh!
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: WA Tiger on May 28, 2014, 08:07:43 PM
I would have Cameron at the club in a heartbeat!
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: Chuck17 on May 28, 2014, 08:09:16 PM
I would have Cameron at the club in a heartbeat!

Straight swap for Shed

Get it done Tiges  :clapping
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: Gigantor on May 28, 2014, 08:23:03 PM
AS always when these things pop up....the good stuff at princess park might be interested
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: Diocletian on May 28, 2014, 08:28:05 PM
Reckon Carlton are in Boyd's ear.....made it clear in every interview before and even just after the draft that he supported them.
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: cub on May 28, 2014, 08:51:42 PM
Mad tiger has to get dumb foty for that post seriously man....?
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: Mr Magic on May 29, 2014, 10:47:18 AM
I would have Cameron at the club in a heartbeat!


Me too. Jack and he in the fwd 50? Yes please.
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: Phil Mrakov on May 29, 2014, 11:31:48 AM
Reckon Carlton are in Boyd's ear.....made it clear in every interview before and even just after the draft that he supported them.
they don't have any cap space
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: Judge Roughneck on May 29, 2014, 11:37:26 AM
How does everyone always have cap space bar us ffs
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: tony_montana on May 29, 2014, 01:37:33 PM
How does everyone always have cap space bar us ffs

Bc they arent afraid to cut players loose and make adjustments on the run to squeeze them in.
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: tigs2011 on May 29, 2014, 01:49:33 PM
How does everyone always have cap space bar us ffs

Bc they arent afraid to cut players loose and make adjustments on the run to squeeze them in.
Spot on  :clapping
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: Diocletian on May 29, 2014, 01:54:34 PM
How does everyone always have cap space bar us ffs

Bc they arent afraid to cut players loose and make adjustments on the run to squeeze them in.

In other words, most other clubs actually have competent list managers.
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: Diocletian on May 29, 2014, 01:56:40 PM
Reckon Carlton are in Boyd's ear.....made it clear in every interview before and even just after the draft that he supported them.
they don't have any cap space

We are talking about Carlton here...
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: tigs2011 on May 29, 2014, 02:02:57 PM
Reckon Carlton are in Boyd's ear.....made it clear in every interview before and even just after the draft that he supported them.
they don't have any cap space

We are talking about Carlton here...
What's a cap?
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: tiga on May 29, 2014, 03:12:13 PM
Cameron is a bit of a one trick pony that most teams have worked out how to stop. Doesn't respond well to close marking and double teaming.

Our money is better spent elsewhere
He doesn't respond well to "double teaming"  :lol
Who does? Isn't he still about 20 years old?
"One trick pony".. He is anything but.
Not having the greatest season to date but almost won a Coleman Medal last year in his second season.
if our development is not much better than putrid what's the point in paying a 20 year old big money, as we will only stuff him up as a player?
What?
Good players are good players. They will develop wherever they are. It's natural to them.
Development is for players that are not stars when they are drafted.
Do you give Richmond credit for the development of Cotch, Lids and Martin? They would be stars if they were drafted anywhere.
It's one thing to not want Cameron but to say he is a one trick pony at age 20 and he is no good when he is  double teamed is stupid.

I did not mention anything about being a one trick pony or when double teamed

On one hand you tell us that our drafting and development is putrid, so therefore we should trade for a first round draft pick that still needs developing, rather than go through the draft and develop our own.  Whats the point of that if we cant develop?

but you then go on to say that a good player will become a good player regardless of development and then list 9 of our first round draft picks from recent times that are good players

So unless you believe we could get cameron without giving up a first round draft pick, you a chasing your tail.

That was me al so I have no idea why the Big Toaster pinned it on you.

BT, to get Cameron out of the game all you have to do is rough him up a bit and he goes missing. Not sure how many games you have seen Cameron play live but I have seen plenty and I can tell you, that last year most clubs gave him too much time and space and allowed him to play his natural game.  This year, opposition teams are right on him and giving him no room to move.

He is very good overhead and judges the flight of the footy really well, but he struggles to get right into heavily contested marking situations unless he can either get a clean leap from behind or wait for scraps off the back of the pack. Last year GWS were kicking over his head whenever possible so he could use his speed in one on one sprints towards the goals which in most cases he won. Drop an extra man back and it kills this type of tactic. Cameron hasn't kicked many goals this way if any this year but last year about 30% of his goals came using this tactic.
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: big tone on May 29, 2014, 06:16:40 PM
Cameron is a bit of a one trick pony that most teams have worked out how to stop. Doesn't respond well to close marking and double teaming.

Our money is better spent elsewhere
He doesn't respond well to "double teaming"  :lol
Who does? Isn't he still about 20 years old?
"One trick pony".. He is anything but.
Not having the greatest season to date but almost won a Coleman Medal last year in his second season.
if our development is not much better than putrid what's the point in paying a 20 year old big money, as we will only stuff him up as a player?
What?
Good players are good players. They will develop wherever they are. It's natural to them.
Development is for players that are not stars when they are drafted.
Do you give Richmond credit for the development of Cotch, Lids and Martin? They would be stars if they were drafted anywhere.
It's one thing to not want Cameron but to say he is a one trick pony at age 20 and he is no good when he is  double teamed is stupid.

I did not mention anything about being a one trick pony or when double teamed

On one hand you tell us that our drafting and development is putrid, so therefore we should trade for a first round draft pick that still needs developing, rather than go through the draft and develop our own.  Whats the point of that if we cant develop?

but you then go on to say that a good player will become a good player regardless of development and then list 9 of our first round draft picks from recent times that are good players

So unless you believe we could get cameron without giving up a first round draft pick, you a chasing your tail.

That was me al so I have no idea why the Big Toaster pinned it on you.

BT, to get Cameron out of the game all you have to do is rough him up a bit and he goes missing. Not sure how many games you have seen Cameron play live but I have seen plenty and I can tell you, that last year most clubs gave him too much time and space and allowed him to play his natural game.  This year, opposition teams are right on him and giving him no room to move.

He is very good overhead and judges the flight of the footy really well, but he struggles to get right into heavily contested marking situations unless he can either get a clean leap from behind or wait for scraps off the back of the pack. Last year GWS were kicking over his head whenever possible so he could use his speed in one on one sprints towards the goals which in most cases he won. Drop an extra man back and it kills this type of tactic. Cameron hasn't kicked many goals this way if any this year but last year about 30% of his goals came using this tactic.
My apologies Al, I thought you were going mad when I read you didn't say that Cameron was a one trick pony. It's tiga that has gone mad!!  :lol :thumbsup
On Cameron, I haven't seen him live much as I go to watch Richmond play most weeks. But I have seen him on TV a fair bit due to watching a friends brother who plays for them. I know it's only an opinion but I think he is a star in the making. And it seems most in the media who have played the game think the same thing. Some even comparing him to The King Wayne Carey who could play a bit. Also saying a 20 year old KPF isn't great when double teamed is a touch hard on the kid. He will get stronger and more experienced and be able to compete a little better for a little longer.
Would love him a Tigerland but I know it won't happen.
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: lamington on May 29, 2014, 06:37:06 PM
We need a KPF who isn't shy in unleashing a torp 70m out.
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: WA Tiger on May 29, 2014, 06:44:11 PM
We need a KPF who isn't shy in unleashing a torp 70m out.

Griff can do that with a drop punt.....but we don't let him..
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: Judge Roughneck on May 29, 2014, 06:52:04 PM
Yep.
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: Penelope on May 30, 2014, 09:15:05 AM
We need a KPF who isn't shy in unleashing a torp 70m out.

Griff can do that with a drop punt.....but we don't let him..
What?
we dont let him? :huh3
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: Judge Roughneck on May 30, 2014, 09:26:57 AM
Griff can kick half the ground

He is instructed to kick ten meters sideways dinky crap instead

Its infuriating
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: Penelope on May 30, 2014, 09:29:01 AM
bollocks
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: MintOnLamb on May 30, 2014, 09:57:38 AM
Nuh
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: Mr Magic on May 30, 2014, 10:04:35 AM
He's probably going to the Swans.
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: lamington on May 30, 2014, 10:40:47 AM
Griff can kick half the ground

He is instructed to kick ten meters sideways dinky crap instead

Its infuriating

Slightly off topic, how about that pass from Martin to Riewoldt? Martin took that kick in the centre of the ground and somehow it made it deep in the forward pocket!
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: Chuck17 on May 30, 2014, 11:29:32 AM
We need a KPF who isn't shy in unleashing a torp 70m out.

Griff can do that with a drop punt.....but we don't let him..
What?
we dont let him? :huh3

It's unbelievable some of the bullstuffingpoo that is posted
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: Judge Roughneck on May 30, 2014, 11:55:52 AM
So Griff can kick 70 - yet often does dinky 5 m side ways kicks

Directly opposed to the coaches orders?
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: Penelope on May 30, 2014, 03:24:03 PM
So Griff can kick 70 - yet often does dinky 5 m side ways kicks

Directly opposed to the coaches orders?

but of course, the only possibilities are that the coaches tell him to only kick long or only to kick short. it has to be one or the other doesnt it ? ::)

if you havnt seen griffiths roost long kicks from half back or take shots on goal from outside 50 then you clearly do not watch games.

If you think that the coaches tell him not to ever kick long, either for a pass or more specifically, for goal (which is what the original stupidity was that started this conversation ) then you are clearly mental.
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: Phillip on May 30, 2014, 04:49:13 PM
We don't let him kick 70m? That's just stupid and incorrect.
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: the claw on May 30, 2014, 06:56:19 PM
Griff can kick half the ground

He is instructed to kick ten meters sideways dinky crap instead

Its infuriating
lol that is golden and taking defending poor players to a new extreme.  id be happy if griffiths could just get the ball so  he can kick it 5 mtrs or 70.
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: Chuck17 on May 30, 2014, 10:33:14 PM
Griff can kick half the ground

He is instructed to kick ten meters sideways dinky crap instead

Its infuriating
lol that is golden and taking defending poor players to a new extreme.  id be happy if griffiths could just get the ball so  he can kick it 5 mtrs or 70.

Good point Claw are the coaches not telling him to get a possession so he can't kick it 5m
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: Penelope on May 31, 2014, 08:20:49 AM
lmao
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: tony_montana on May 31, 2014, 12:10:02 PM
 :lol
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: Willy on May 31, 2014, 11:35:38 PM
GET THIS KID.
CHF.
 would straighten us up big time.
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: the claw on June 01, 2014, 12:14:36 AM
gotta say anyone who thinks we have good tall fwd stocks are kidding themselves.
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: Rampstar on June 01, 2014, 12:16:08 AM
We only have Riewoldt. We have no one else.
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: Diocletian on June 01, 2014, 12:18:01 AM
We only have Riewoldt. We have no one else.

Starting to look that way....
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on June 01, 2014, 10:28:06 AM
It looks that way but the ball movement to the forward line must be the worst in the history of the club.
It would be terrible playing as a KPP for us.......
Title: Re: Jeremy Cameron?
Post by: WA Tiger on June 01, 2014, 10:50:56 AM
gotta say anyone who thinks we have good tall fwd stocks are kidding themselves.

Same as our backline, offers little to nothing. In fact, same as our center, the centerline that was being touted as one of the best in the comp next to the hawks. Who is in there now...Cotch..and ...um.... ::)

We had Cotch, Foley, Arnott, Deledio, Martin.....now Martin is played everywhere except up in the pie stand, Lids has been booted down back again Foley is the sub, Arnott has been sent back to the two's for no reason and Cotch is alone!!!