One-Eyed Richmond Forum
Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: Phillip on June 08, 2014, 09:49:51 PM
-
does he get a kick when the game is on the line? was it 3 in the last quarter last week? :lol
-
Did we get an inside 50 in the 3rd qtr?
-
corkhead
-
The whole season has been junk time.
-
This is disgusting, isn't it? Isn't it disgusting?
-
I'm disgusted, come to think of it i'm disgusting. Yeah I'm in a gang.
-
some sort of Wolfgang or germanic wolfpack, if you will...
-
Piece of play right in front of me tonight early 2nd q on our fwd 50 line in the outer; 3 Nth players, 2 Tigers, Jack and Petterd. Now I am not Petterd's biggest fan, far from it, but the 3 North players just played ring a rosy with handball while Petterd was just chasing all 3 of them. In the meantime our esteemed dual Coleman medallist was standing there playing with his balls. I don't care how acclaimed a player you are, or if you are on 700k. If you aren't prepared to put in defensively, f off!
-
I'm disgusted, come to think of it i'm disgusting. Yeah I'm in a gang.
More like a parliament Owl!
-
Seems every week is junk time from 1/4 time I think you're being harsh
-
what is really peeing me off about jacks game is his consistant nudging in the back of his opponent.He's getting done almost every time for it.
Lazy sod ,work your arse off and get the front position like good full forwards have always done
-
Its that time of the game again
comeon Jack, pad those stats you flog
-
I cant blame Jack, its Edwards who will cash in..S EDWARDS.
-
No junk time today, stood up when it counted
-
Could win a coleman
-
Could win a coleman
A real one ?
-
3rd fake one
-
3rd fake one
I'll take it anyway
-
Thought Jack was sensational today.
-
Killed it today. We just need a big CHF with him. Vickery third tall/second ruck.
-
nah, just need vickery to stand up more often
whenever we play 3 genuine talls up forward jack goes missing.
for some reason our forward line with jack as a focal point function best with 2 talls rather than 3
-
Jacks a gun vickery is a Thorpe
-
gay?
-
Not that there's anything wrong with that. :whistle
-
Thought Jack was sensational today.
Played pretty well I thought and did a lot of 'team' acts.
-
Thought Jack was sensational today.
Played pretty well I thought and did a lot of 'team' acts.
x 2
:clapping
-
Thought Jack was sensational today.
Played pretty well I thought and did a lot of 'team' acts.
x 2
:clapping
x3
-
Junk time Shultz
-
Killed it today. We just need a big CHF with him. Vickery third tall/second ruck.
If only we give a McBean, Griffiths, Elton a proper shot ...
FWIW i like Vickery in the ruck. Maric and Jack forward with a 3rd option one of the above
-
I like Jack. He is more of a Gunstan than a Dunstall though.
We need a Roughead to take the pressure off of him. Moving the ball quickly and kicking it long to him didn't hurt on the weekend. Would like to see more of that.
-
Did someone say Kristian Jaksch? :whistle
-
Killed it today. We just need a big CHF with him. Vickery third tall/second ruck.
If only we give a McBean, Griffiths, Elton a proper shot ...
FWIW i like Vickery in the ruck. Maric and Jack forward with a 3rd option one of the above
I recon Griff has had his turn, and unfortunately failed. Agreed though give McBean ago. Surely Dimma would have learnt a leason with Miles- if you give someone who has deserved a game, he might just surprise you.
I'm flying over to Perth for the next game, would really love to see Liam taken over there for his fist game. Really what have we got to loose?
-
I recon Griff has had his turn, and unfortunately failed. Agreed though give McBean ago. Surely Dimma would have learnt a leason with Miles- if you give someone who has deserved a game, he might just surprise you.
I'm flying over to Perth for the next game, would really love to see Liam taken over there for his fist game. Really what have we got to loose?
We've had nothing to lose for a fair chunk of this season BT but sadly Hardwick and his cohorts haven't seen the sense in playing the kids to assess or develop them in any senior role so I doubt that I'll be holding my breathe waiting for his nirvana moment to breakthrough this weekend, especially now that our season is soooo back on track after one good win. :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead
-
Griffiths played back at reserves.He's played back and ruck at times in his few senior games.
He's not been given a game behind McGaune and aEdwards at times. Certainly not been given the "proper" go like a Reece Stanley or Aaron black who have played.
Elton and McBean have got a single game between them.
-
Did someone say Kristian Jaksch? :whistle
I hope it was someone at the club.
-
Killed it today. We just need a big CHF with him. Vickery third tall/second ruck.
If only we give a McBean, Griffiths, Elton a proper shot ...
FWIW i like Vickery in the ruck. Maric and Jack forward with a 3rd option one of the above
I recon Griff has had his turn, and unfortunately failed. Agreed though give McBean ago. Surely Dimma would have learnt a leason with Miles- if you give someone who has deserved a game, he might just surprise you.
I'm flying over to Perth for the next game, would really love to see Liam taken over there for his fist game. Really what have we got to loose?
Looks like Reece Stanley come good
Funny what happens when give the kid a proper shot
-
Griffiths played back at reserves.He's played back and ruck at times in his few senior games.
He's not been given a game behind McGaune and aEdwards at times. Certainly not been given the "proper" go like a Reece Stanley or Aaron black who have played.
Elton and McBean have got a single game between them.
lol griffiths has been given every opportunity. ffs hes played 10 games this yr and failed to take his chances. in previous yrs hes struggled to touch the ball in the reserves or have any sort of impact yet you want him played.
griffiths has never ever been in competition with mcguane or a edwards for a spot. his competition comes from vickery riewoldt and elton. or if he performs the 2nd ruck role his competition is hampson and maybe vickery.
the only person to blame for griffiths not getting a game is griffiths himself. he has in the main been terrible. i would not be surprised in the least to see him either offered around at trade time or delisted.
on stanly he managed just 20 games in his first 3 seasons. he has been more consistent than both griffiths and vickery yet he still has very poor games fairly regularly.
aaron black while he had plenty of injury early actually had to earn a game and poor form has meant he gets dropped.
the difference between these blokes and griffiths is they have performed well and actually earnt a game. they havent been given games on the back of virtually nothing.
-
Griffiths played back at reserves.He's played back and ruck at times in his few senior games.
He's not been given a game behind McGaune and aEdwards at times. Certainly not been given the "proper" go like a Reece Stanley or Aaron black who have played.
Elton and McBean have got a single game between them.
lol griffiths has been given every opportunity. ffs hes played 10 games this yr and failed to take his chances. in previous yrs hes struggled to touch the ball in the reserves or have any sort of impact yet you want him played.
Griffiths hasn't been given every chance. Hes been dropped after very serviceable games. Hes responbed by kicking bags in the VFL. When hes given a chance he has ended up be number one in the afl for contested marks. In previous years hes been played at full back which is non logical.
griffiths has never ever been in competition with mcguane or a edwards for a spot. his competition comes from vickery riewoldt and elton. or if he performs the 2nd ruck role his competition is hampson and maybe vickery.
the only person to blame for griffiths not getting a game is griffiths himself. he has in the main been terrible. i would not be surprised in the least to see him either offered around at trade time or delisted.
Incorrect.
on stanly he managed just 20 games in his first 3 seasons. he has been more consistent than both griffiths and vickery yet he still has very poor games fairly regularly.
aaron black while he had plenty of injury early actually had to earn a game and poor form has meant he gets dropped.
the difference between these blokes and griffiths is they have performed well and actually earnt a game. they havent been given games on the back of virtually nothing.
Stanley has been called the "worst player ever" by some St Kilda fans and yet when given a run of games in the forward line, he has unsurpisingly come good. A luxury which Griff has not been afforded.
Scott claims Aaron Edwards was delisted so Black could have a spot and be developed in the seniors. You are incorrect again, to accommodate high draft pick Black (like Griff) Norf moved on a experienced player (to us), for the long term benifit regardless of short term. And its now paying off it seems.
-
Griffiths has only kicked 6 goals in 4 VFL games this year, Judge. 4,0,1,1 Hardly "bags".
-
The four was on the back of being unreservedly dropped in the opinions of about 80%+ here.
-
The four was on the back of being unreservedly dropped in the opinions of about 80%+ here.
Didn't he get dropped after the Nth game? And I'm pretty sure he had 2 touches in that game.
Not sure where you get your 80% plus people didn't want him dropped. I guess it's from the same person who has been telling you he has been kicking 'bags' in the twos. :lol
Although he was leading the AFL in contested marks at one stage with an average of 2. :lol
Now there's a stat to get excited about. :thumbsup
-
just like those fake coleman medals
-
just like those fake coleman medals
Jack is a star. He has more talent in his little toe than your love child Griff. :cheers
-
just like those fake coleman medals
Jack is a star. He has more talent in his little toe than your love child Griff. :cheers
Yes it is a concern
-
jack is criticized - not kicking enough goals - yet wins coleman
griff is criticized - - not taking enough contested mark - yet #1 contested marks AFL
-
While we're still debating whether Griffiths will make it - Carlisle kicks a lazy 8.....
-
hes been left at ff all year, no? :whistle
-
Thought he had played a bit down back
-
Thought he had played a bit down back
Apparently that ruins players chances of becoming good forwards
-
Thought he had played a bit down back
Apparently that ruins players chances of becoming good forwards
I have heard that rumour
-
Griffiths played back at reserves.He's played back and ruck at times in his few senior games.
He's not been given a game behind McGaune and aEdwards at times. Certainly not been given the "proper" go like a Reece Stanley or Aaron black who have played.
Elton and McBean have got a single game between them.
lol griffiths has been given every opportunity. ffs hes played 10 games this yr and failed to take his chances. in previous yrs hes struggled to touch the ball in the reserves or have any sort of impact yet you want him played.
1/ Griffiths hasn't been given every chance. Hes been dropped after very serviceable games. Hes responbed by kicking bags in the VFL. When hes given a chance he has ended up be number one in the afl for contested marks. In previous years hes been played at full back which is non logical.
griffiths has never ever been in competition with mcguane or a edwards for a spot. his competition comes from vickery riewoldt and elton. or if he performs the 2nd ruck role his competition is hampson and maybe vickery.
the only person to blame for griffiths not getting a game is griffiths himself. he has in the main been terrible. i would not be surprised in the least to see him either offered around at trade time or delisted.
2/ Incorrect.
on stanly he managed just 20 games in his first 3 seasons. he has been more consistent than both griffiths and vickery yet he still has very poor games fairly regularly.
aaron black while he had plenty of injury early actually had to earn a game and poor form has meant he gets dropped.
the difference between these blokes and griffiths is they have performed well and actually earnt a game. they havent been given games on the back of virtually nothing.
3/ Stanley has been called the "worst player ever" by some St Kilda fans and yet when given a run of games in the forward line, he has unsurpisingly come good. A luxury which Griff has not been afforded.
4/ Scott claims Aaron Edwards was delisted so Black could have a spot and be developed in the seniors. You are incorrect again, to accommodate high draft pick Black (like Griff) Norf moved on a experienced player (to us), for the long term benifit regardless of short term. And its now paying off it seems.
[/quote
]oh dear your getting your information from the same place bo is aint ya. explains a lot. lets see now
1/ griffiths has had plenty of opportunities and close to 5 whole yrs to show something and has failed abysmally. but hey you put the duds on a pedastal if you like. most first yr talls are giving more.
and your wrong HES DONE NOTHING IN THE VFL. But i forget players dont have to do much at all for you to announce them stars.
ffs we did offer griffiths around at the end of last yr and there was no takers. yet we gave him one more yr rather than delist him, have given him 10 games in the first 12 or so to show something more than barely average at best, and you moan like a little bitch about no opportunity. please give me a freakin break. you do realise you play on performance. ben griffiths best games this yr have been barely passable.and you wonder why he has got dropped. geez some have the bar set in the basement.
2/ nope its dead right. seems you have no idea about structure and player types. tyrone vickery currently has ben griffiths spot in the side. you know 195cm to 200cm, 95kg to 100 kg are very different types to 184cm and 190cm players like edwards and mcguane.
the only other option comparison and role you can make is ruck/fwd and griffiths is not currently being played as a second ruck/fwd because hes been almost as poor if not worse than shaun hampson. hes in competition with hampson for that role or even vickery. . neither deserve a game. imo vickery as a kpf doesnt either.
3/ well if saints fans are disgruntled with stanley it just goes to show they are harsher judges than the likes of you. stanley has been better IMO THAN BOTH VICKERY AND GRIFFITHS. god knows what they would be saying if they had those two hacks running around.
stanley has gone from terrible to pretty decent and thuis still lacks consistency even this yr. yet his yr is miles in front of anything our boys have shown imo. as i said hes been regularly dropped, even this yr. he played just 20 games in three yrs, but go look for yourself when hes played okay hes dished up far more than ben griffiths has even looked capable of. so hes deserved a go at senior level griffiths has not.
4/ What planet are you on. A Edwards was not delisted by nm. In fact he was going to be retained as back up or depth, he knew he was going to get limited time and agreed to be traded at the eleventh hour.. yes we asked at the eleventh hour and nm traded him to us. geezus son get it right will ya.
-
hes been left at ff all year, no? :whistle
hilarious, are you really that naieve, or are you just plain disingenuous. i reckon your just naieve.
-
Would we consider the following sentence true or false
'Carlise has played the majority of the season in the forward line. Even during poor form and media critics.
-
2/ nope its dead right. seems you have no idea about structure and player types. tyrone vickery currently has ben griffiths spot in the side. you know 195cm to 200cm, 95kg to 100 kg are very different types to 184cm and 190cm players like edwards and mcguane.
the only other option comparison and role you can make is ruck/fwd and griffiths is not currently being played as a second ruck/fwd because hes been almost as poor if not worse than shaun hampson. hes in competition with hampson for that role or even vickery. . neither deserve a game. imo vickery as a kpf doesnt either.
Sorry Claw but the way Edwards and Mcguane played was as third tall and that's what Griffiths is going to play if he does play AFL. I don't think he's in competition with Vickery because Vickery is and will remain our second forward and if another forward comes in they'll be played as 3rd forward.
-
Would we consider the following sentence true or false
'Carlise has played the majority of the season in the forward line. Even during poor form and media critics.
Please tell me you are not putting Carlise and Griff in the same thought patten. One was considered for AA last year and one has played about 3 games that are AFL standard. So leaving a guy in the side that has proven himself a very good AFL player when his form is down is nothing like dropping a guy that had two touches in the last AFL game.
I do respect your 'love Richmond players no matter how bad they really are thing'. I must admit I can no longer do it. I would get rid of about half the list if it were up to me.
We are too soft as a footy club. :cheers
-
Would we consider the following sentence true or false
'Carlise has played the majority of the season in the forward line. Even during poor form and media critics.
Please tell me you are not putting Carlise and Griff in the same thought patten. One was considered for AA last year and one has played about 3 games that are AFL standard. So leaving a guy in the side that has proven himself a very good AFL player when his form is down is nothing like dropping a guy that had two touches in the last AFL game.
I do respect your 'love Richmond players no matter how bad they really are thing'. I must admit I can no longer do it. I would get rid of about half the list if it were up to me.
We are too soft as a footy club. :cheers
Black carlise Griffiths were taken within seven picks of each other in the same draft hence are comparable IMo
Don't worry I am more than capable seeing the shyte output of people playing for richmond jumper. I a merely outlining the truth that black and carlise have been well managed and backed. Where as Griffiths is and has been out the outer due to the favouritism of Aaron Edwards McGaune hampson
-
Claw
I apologise for my memory. Aaron Edwards was not delisted. We traded him for pick 207.
Claw
Vickery 99 afl goals @ 1.2
Your mate Stanley 35 @ 0.7
-
With Jack kicking three in the first quarter against the Swans and not much after, do we need to change thread title to "Out of the blocks early Jack" or soemthing similar?
-
With Jack kicking three in the first quarter against the Swans and not much after, do we need to change thread title to "Out of the blocks early Jack" or soemthing similar?
Premature Ejackulation
-
:lol :lol :lol
:bow :clapping
-
One likes to choke people and give away stupid 50m penalties. Liability if you arks me.