One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: Diocletian on October 06, 2014, 02:10:03 PM

Title: David Armitage
Post by: Diocletian on October 06, 2014, 02:10:03 PM
Apparently trade radio running with a stuff rumour that we're looking to trade pick 11to St. Kilda for David Armitage.....

...normally the first part of that sentence would be enough to dismiss the second part of it out of hand - but..... this is Richmond....
Title: Re: David Armitage
Post by: Judge Roughneck on October 06, 2014, 02:25:41 PM
Slow
Can't kick
But fat


Ticks all the boxes
Title: Re: David Armitage
Post by: Rampstar on October 06, 2014, 02:36:20 PM
Apparently trade radio running with a stuff rumour that we're looking to trade pick 11to St. Kilda for David Armitage.....

...normally the first part of that sentence would be enough to dismiss the second part of it out of hand - but..... this is Richmond....

lol we may as well shut the joint down if they start making trades like that
Title: Re: David Armitage
Post by: Phil Mrakov on October 06, 2014, 02:53:05 PM
Slow
Can't kick
But fat


Ticks all the boxes
Greenwood is fat too
Title: Re: David Armitage
Post by: Judge Roughneck on October 06, 2014, 02:56:05 PM
Armitage > norfwood
Title: Re: David Armitage
Post by: Phil Mrakov on October 06, 2014, 03:01:43 PM
Armitage > norfwood
you reckon Armatage is better than Greenwood
Title: Re: David Armitage
Post by: Judge Roughneck on October 06, 2014, 03:08:55 PM
I don't watch north much cause they boring

But armitage goes alright

Our first pick but, would be rather disturbing result
Title: Re: David Armitage
Post by: pmac21 on October 06, 2014, 03:21:46 PM
Would want there 2nd round pick also. 
Title: Re: David Armitage
Post by: pmac21 on October 06, 2014, 03:22:14 PM
Good player, not great but good.
Title: Re: David Armitage
Post by: one-eyed on October 06, 2014, 03:25:21 PM
St Kilda's Ameet Bains says there's "nothing to discuss" on David Armitage. He is contracted and not going anywhere #NABTradeRadio

https://twitter.com/traderadio
Title: Re: Trade week rumours and innuendo
Post by: georgies31 on October 06, 2014, 03:25:55 PM
If we get him at all let alone pick 11 we a joke.
Title: Re: David Armitage
Post by: georgies31 on October 06, 2014, 03:27:09 PM
St Kilda's Ameet Bains says there's "nothing to discuss" on David Armitage. He is contracted and not going anywhere #NABTradeRadio

https://twitter.com/traderadio

Thanks god only richmond would do something dumb like that.




Edit: Fixed quoting
Title: Re: David Armitage
Post by: tony_montana on October 06, 2014, 04:46:59 PM
Armitage > norfwood
you reckon Armatage is better than Greenwood

Armitage was pick#9, Greenwood pick#32 therefore in JR's reckoning it will always be Armitage>Greenwood
Title: Re: David Armitage
Post by: Judge Roughneck on October 06, 2014, 05:30:15 PM
Armtiga plays week vs. Richmond
Title: Re: David Armitage
Post by: bojangles17 on October 06, 2014, 05:49:29 PM
his value would be something like, our R2 for their R3 and Armo, he s a battler , no better than Matt Thomas  :shh
Title: Re: David Armitage
Post by: Chuck17 on October 06, 2014, 08:15:11 PM
Straight swap for Hampson
Title: Re: David Armitage
Post by: TigerMonk on October 06, 2014, 11:06:34 PM
All strong wind  :lol
Title: Re: David Armitage
Post by: Penelope on October 06, 2014, 11:34:27 PM
face book rumour  :lol

Title: Re: David Armitage
Post by: the claw on October 06, 2014, 11:36:38 PM
ah al and face book. look at me look at me, yep makes sense.
Title: Re: David Armitage
Post by: Diocletian on October 06, 2014, 11:53:30 PM
Why did the mods turn this into a seperate thread?
Title: Re: David Armitage
Post by: dwaino on October 07, 2014, 12:00:30 AM
To make it look like we're doing something this trade period.
Title: Re: David Armitage
Post by: Diocletian on October 07, 2014, 12:10:59 AM
Whoa WP & OER are on the ball don't you worry about that.
Title: Re: David Armitage
Post by: yellowandback on October 07, 2014, 09:23:31 AM
To make it look like we're doing something this trade period.

 :lol
Title: Re: David Armitage
Post by: scjhammo on October 07, 2014, 10:35:27 AM
his contracted till next year seems everyone Richmond are after him, shields danger are all contracted till next year... so itsa all pointless bring it up why would we pay someoneleses contract out.... I remember all the talk last year was we were get hosking Elliott from GWS and if we didn't get him that year he was off contract and he will be coming across 2015 were has that talk gone...
Title: Re: David Armitage
Post by: tony_montana on October 07, 2014, 10:39:48 AM
his contracted till next year seems everyone Richmond are after him, shields danger are all contracted till next year... so itsa all pointless bring it up why would we pay someoneleses contract out.... I remember all the talk last year was we were get hosking Elliott from GWS and if we didn't get him that year he was off contract and he will be coming across 2015 were has that talk gone...

keep the memberships turning over in anticipation  :cheers
Title: Re: David Armitage
Post by: Rampstar on October 08, 2014, 10:18:50 AM
his contracted till next year seems everyone Richmond are after him, shields danger are all contracted till next year... so itsa all pointless bring it up why would we pay someoneleses contract out.... I remember all the talk last year was we were get hosking Elliott from GWS and if we didn't get him that year he was off contract and he will be coming across 2015 were has that talk gone...

keep the memberships turning over in anticipation  :cheers

that's exactly right. I reckon the club puts most of this poo into the media so the supporters have hope and they buy memberships. Then they go and recruit the likes of Hampson and tell us its a good deal  :lol
Title: Re: David Armitage
Post by: RFC_Official on October 08, 2014, 10:51:32 AM
his contracted till next year seems everyone Richmond are after him, shields danger are all contracted till next year... so itsa all pointless bring it up why would we pay someoneleses contract out.... I remember all the talk last year was we were get hosking Elliott from GWS and if we didn't get him that year he was off contract and he will be coming across 2015 were has that talk gone...

keep the memberships turning over in anticipation  :cheers

that's exactly right. I reckon the club puts most of this poo into the media so the supporters have hope and they buy memberships. Then they go and recruit the likes of Hampson and tell us its a good deal  :lol

Link me to where a Richmond official has spoken about Dangerfield, Shiels or Hoskin Elliot and I'll happily agree with you.
Title: Re: David Armitage
Post by: Judge Roughneck on October 08, 2014, 12:06:17 PM
his contracted till next year seems everyone Richmond are after him, shields danger are all contracted till next year... so itsa all pointless bring it up why would we pay someoneleses contract out.... I remember all the talk last year was we were get hosking Elliott from GWS and if we didn't get him that year he was off contract and he will be coming across 2015 were has that talk gone...

keep the memberships turning over in anticipation  :cheers

that's exactly right. I reckon the club puts most of this poo into the media so the supporters have hope and they buy memberships. Then they go and recruit the likes of Hampson and tell us its a good deal  :lol

Link me to where a Richmond official has spoken about Dangerfield, Shiels or Hoskin Elliot and I'll happily agree with you.

Yeah -  we are NAE chasing anyone decent
  :bow
Keep patting your self on the back

Throw the kitchen sink at Christensen FFS
Title: Re: David Armitage
Post by: dwaino on October 08, 2014, 12:48:07 PM
his contracted till next year seems everyone Richmond are after him, shields danger are all contracted till next year... so itsa all pointless bring it up why would we pay someoneleses contract out.... I remember all the talk last year was we were get hosking Elliott from GWS and if we didn't get him that year he was off contract and he will be coming across 2015 were has that talk gone...

keep the memberships turning over in anticipation  :cheers

that's exactly right. I reckon the club puts most of this poo into the media so the supporters have hope and they buy memberships. Then they go and recruit the likes of Hampson and tell us its a good deal  :lol

Link me to where a Richmond official has spoken about Dangerfield, Shiels or Hoskin Elliot and I'll happily agree with you.

Did you draw the short straw to jump on OER again? Surely it is considered among your office as the Chernobyl of the Richmond fan* forums, off limits unless for special purposes and inhabited by mutants that revel in misery.
Title: Re: David Armitage
Post by: Judge Roughneck on October 08, 2014, 12:49:40 PM
Good wildlife but
Title: Re: David Armitage
Post by: 🏅Dooks on October 08, 2014, 12:50:41 PM
The best  :gotigers
Title: Re: David Armitage
Post by: dwaino on October 08, 2014, 12:55:19 PM
Once you're in unfortunately society won't take you back   :-[
Title: Re: David Armitage
Post by: Diocletian on October 08, 2014, 01:02:58 PM
his contracted till next year seems everyone Richmond are after him, shields danger are all contracted till next year... so itsa all pointless bring it up why would we pay someoneleses contract out.... I remember all the talk last year was we were get hosking Elliott from GWS and if we didn't get him that year he was off contract and he will be coming across 2015 were has that talk gone...

keep the memberships turning over in anticipation  :cheers

that's exactly right. I reckon the club puts most of this poo into the media so the supporters have hope and they buy memberships. Then they go and recruit the likes of Hampson and tell us its a good deal  :lol

Link me to where a Richmond official has spoken about Dangerfield, Shiels or Hoskin Elliot and I'll happily agree with you.

Did you draw the short straw to jump on OER again? Surely it is considered among your office as the Chernobyl of the Richmond fan* forums, off limits unless for special purposes and inhabited by mutants that revel in misery.

This place is the Oxford debating society compared to other forums.
Title: Re: David Armitage
Post by: Rampstar on October 08, 2014, 01:06:15 PM
his contracted till next year seems everyone Richmond are after him, shields danger are all contracted till next year... so itsa all pointless bring it up why would we pay someoneleses contract out.... I remember all the talk last year was we were get hosking Elliott from GWS and if we didn't get him that year he was off contract and he will be coming across 2015 were has that talk gone...

keep the memberships turning over in anticipation  :cheers

that's exactly right. I reckon the club puts most of this poo into the media so the supporters have hope and they buy memberships. Then they go and recruit the likes of Hampson and tell us its a good deal  :lol

Link me to where a Richmond official has spoken about Dangerfield, Shiels or Hoskin Elliot and I'll happily agree with you.

Did you draw the short straw to jump on OER again? Surely it is considered among your office as the Chernobyl of the Richmond fan* forums, off limits unless for special purposes and inhabited by mutants that revel in misery.

This place is the Oxford debating society campared to other forums.

that's actually true
Title: Re: David Armitage
Post by: one-eyed on October 08, 2014, 01:21:15 PM
Back to the topic ppl. As we have said multiple times over the years, we don't care what other forums are like.
Title: Re: David Armitage
Post by: Judge Roughneck on October 16, 2014, 11:30:28 AM
john ralph reckons we offered #12 for armitage ...
Title: Re: David Armitage
Post by: taztiger4 on October 16, 2014, 11:31:38 AM
john ralph reckons we offered #12 for armitage ...

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Title: Re: David Armitage
Post by: Tiger Tragic on October 16, 2014, 11:35:07 AM
john ralph reckons we offered #12 for armitage ...

And Saints turned it down?  I guess understandable after getting 19 for Stanley - Armitage would be picks 1, 2 and 3 on that value scale.
Title: Re: David Armitage
Post by: Rampstar on October 16, 2014, 11:37:14 AM
john ralph reckons we offered #12 for armitage ...

its comedy capers at Punt Road again. Armitage is slow as treacle.
Title: Re: David Armitage
Post by: Francois Jackson on October 16, 2014, 11:45:46 AM
john ralph reckons we offered #12 for armitage ...

i dont believe it
Title: Re: David Armitage
Post by: tony_montana on October 16, 2014, 11:47:44 AM
john ralph reckons we offered #12 for armitage ...

And Saints turned it down?  I guess understandable after getting 19 for Stanley - Armitage would be picks 1, 2 and 3 on that value scale.

 :lol
Title: Re: David Armitage
Post by: eliminator on October 16, 2014, 01:50:59 PM
his contracted till next year seems everyone Richmond are after him, shields danger are all contracted till next year... so itsa all pointless bring it up why would we pay someoneleses contract out.... I remember all the talk last year was we were get hosking Elliott from GWS and if we didn't get him that year he was off contract and he will be coming across 2015 were has that talk gone...

Liked the picture you posted of Nero playing the fiddle as Rome burns on another topic but believe a picture of Caligula would have been more appropriate
keep the memberships turning over in anticipation  :cheers

that's exactly right. I reckon the club puts most of this poo into the media so the supporters have hope and they buy memberships. Then they go and recruit the likes of Hampson and tell us its a good deal  :lol

Link me to where a Richmond official has spoken about Dangerfield, Shiels or Hoskin Elliot and I'll happily agree with you.

Did you draw the short straw to jump on OER again? Surely it is considered among your office as the Chernobyl of the Richmond fan* forums, off limits unless for special purposes and inhabited by mutants that revel in misery.

This place is the Oxford debating society compared to other forums.
Title: Re: David Armitage
Post by: one-eyed on October 16, 2014, 02:21:53 PM
john ralph reckons we offered #12 for armitage ...
Thankfully nothing was done.