One-Eyed Richmond Forum
Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: Diocletian on July 22, 2016, 09:07:39 PM
-
http://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/2016-07-22/forum-questions-answered-by-peggy-oneal
Might just kick back and enjoy this one....(http://www.sherv.net/cm/emoticons/drink/popcorn-and-drink-smiley-emoticon.gif)
-
More fluff from this idiot
To the clubs credit they didn't screen the questions. They were generally all good questions but the answers were all rubbish
-
About 3 decent questions
.
-
I'll leave the logic of picking and choosing forums for now..... They were good enough questions
I have a question for Willy P - you constantly crap on about how people opposing the board know the issues but have no solutions - how the hell is that crap any different?
-
I'll leave the logic of picking and choosing forums for now..... They were good enough questions
I have a question for Willy P - you constantly crap on about how people opposing the board know the issues but have no solutions - how the hell is that crap any different?
I guess at the moment, if both have no solutions, one is at least experienced and the other has no experience running a club. At least this board has wiped off our debt.....
-
Because we have significant football experience on our Board, we have not identified anyone as a Football Director. Tony Free played 133 games for Richmond, captained the Club and was a two-time Best and Fairest winner. Brendon Gale played 244 games, has been an outstanding Chief Executive and is now a member of our Board. Both Tony and Brendon give us significant football experience – quite probably more than the majority of other clubs – and clearly, as CEO, Brendon is responsible for the overall operation of the Club, including the football department.
Lol
Wilderness experience.
-
Disappointing >:( >:( >:(
-
Not really.
What one expects from that lot by now.
-
Earlier this week, questions were sought for President Peggy O'Neal from Richmond supporters on fan forums Punt Road End and BigFooty. Members of the forums decided which ten questions they thought were the most pertinent to answer about the Club at this point in time. Below are the questions, with answers from Richmond President Peggy O'Neal...
-------------
Why wasn't OER included?
Why weren't we asked to join in on the conversation?
Are the members of these forums better supporters than us?
Do we even exist? What the hell is going on here!
-
Not one question about the lack of A grade talent being brought in at FA & trade time after being so vocal about doing so.
How very convenient.
-
I'll leave the logic of picking and choosing forums for now..... They were good enough questions
I have a question for Willy P - you constantly crap on about how people opposing the board know the issues but have no solutions - how the hell is that crap any different?
I guess at the moment, if both have no solutions, one is at least experienced and the other has no experience running a club. At least this board has wiped off our debt.....
This hardly inspires any form of accountability for performance.
Experience doesn't mean much if it can't be used to leverage effective performance, take Tyrone Vickery as exhibit A.
Actually it was the supporters who wiped out the debt (again).
-
Shut up peg
Bla bla bla don't bother to listen to the PR anymore, haven't for a while now.
It's all about what happens out there on game day and it ain't very good!
As usual be there Sunday all the same, may just put in a big one for our bunnies🐯
-
I'm scared.
I'm scared because, every time one of these stuffn imbeciles says anything (and it's always rubbish)
the unaccountability is endorsed, cluelessly by every other proven loser working the club.
What hope is there ?
None.
-
I'm scared.
I'm scared because, every time one of these stuffn imbeciles says anything (and it's always rubbish)
the unaccountability is endorsed, cluelessly by every other proven loser working the club.
What hope is there ?
None.
Accountability is an issue, very little putting haggits on the line by the club for a couple of years because they lack the confidence in each other to make it happen (or so it would seem).
But hey, no one else is better so let's stick with the incumbents....
-
I have a question for Willy P - you constantly crap on about how people opposing the board know the issues but have no solutions - how the hell is that crap any different?
Without being pedantic what I "crap on about" as you put it is all these people who stand (which you conveniently forgot to mention that I've said i have no problem woth) is that they constantly tell us whats wrong but nver present a plan on how they intend to improve things. Never tell us how they can improve sponsorship, what football expertise they have, what their views on governance and how they handle that etc
With the cureent mob despite all their mistakes (of which there are many with that contract extension the biggest blunder) they have a score on the board in a number of areas they are a responsible for driving eg record sponsorship, improved governance, record membership, strategic planning etc.
While i know it pains people to want to give them credit for anything mainly due to the previously mentioned contract blunder this board have actually done a number of things that boards are supposed to do and have done them well.
Does that excuse the recent mistakes? No it doesn't. Does the board need some freash faces? Most probably yes but until someone puts forward a real alternative and that means putting forward something other a list moans and stating what blind Freddie can see then they actually offer us nothing new. Put simply any person who wants a place on that board needs to offer alot more than the stock standard sook fest
-
I have a question for Willy P - you constantly crap on about how people opposing the board know the issues but have no solutions - how the hell is that crap any different?
Without being pedantic what I "crap on about" as you put it is all these people who stand (which you conveniently forgot to mention that I've said i have no problem woth) is that they constantly tell us whats wrong but nver present a plan on how they intend to improve things. Never tell us how they can improve sponsorship, what football expertise they have, what their views on governance and how they handle that etc
With the cureent mob despite all their mistakes (of which there are many with that contract extension the biggest blunder) they have a score on the board in a number of areas they are a responsible for driving eg record sponsorship, improved governance, record membership, strategic planning etc.
While i know it pains people to want to give them credit for anything mainly due to the previously mentioned contract blunder this board have actually done a number of things that boards are supposed to do and have done them well.
Does that excuse the recent mistakes? No it doesn't. Does the board need some freash faces? Most probably yes but until someone puts forward a real alternative and that means putting forward something other a list moans and stating what blind Freddie can see then they actually offer us nothing new. Put simply any person who wants a place on that board needs to offer alot more than the stock standard sook fest
Exactly WP.
I'm continually flabbergasted by posters, who accuse anyone that speaks out on any new push to gain power at the club, to be an apologist or something worse. They refuse to read what the poster is trying to convey.
We all would love for new people who are driven and successful to be on the board as long as they have a clear plan of exactly how they are going to make us great again. Anyone can say "sack all the bums" as they approved Hardwick's extension but ignore anything good they have done for the club.
For example, if a new candidate came in and said he/she had 3 major companies willing to bring in millions of dollars worth of sponsorship if they got elected that would be wonderful. If they said that they have had experience in running sporting organisations successfully would be a plus too. Hell, any major organization would be good. If they outlined ideas they had that could be implemented to bring in money for the club through investments etc would also be a bonus. Even if they outlined the skill set they have that the current board lacks would be great.
However we usually get "I'm rich" and have given a lot of money to the club as the only thing they can say about themselves. Of course there's the obligatory "I want to win a flag soon" line too.
-
Why wasn't OER included?
Why weren't we asked to join in on the conversation?
Are the members of these forums better supporters than us?
Do we even exist? What the hell is going on here!
The same reason RFC_Official doesn't post here. Surely you figured that out :shh
-
Why wasn't OER included?
Why weren't we asked to join in on the conversation?
Are the members of these forums better supporters than us?
Do we even exist? What the hell is going on here!
The same reason RFC_Official doesn't post here. Surely you figured that out :shh
Yeh,people here can articulate the real issues when questioning
That'd scare them away
-
Why wasn't OER included?
Why weren't we asked to join in on the conversation?
Are the members of these forums better supporters than us?
Do we even exist? What the hell is going on here!
The same reason RFC_Official doesn't post here. Surely you figured that out :shh
Yeh,people here can articulate the real issues when questioning
That'd scare them away
:lol if you think so champ
-
the biggest thing wrong with this club aside from hiring a woman to preside over our club, is they look at the past before moving to the future.
I have no doubt dimwit would have been sacked at any other club, but for some stupid reason they look at geelong saving bombers career as the catalyst for the contract extension.
to save face in the public domain they now give coaches more years than they should or deserve to get.
I wish we get pumped by 10 goals plus for the next 5 games and no one turns up. Only then will this dud get the shown the door.
-
A great president leads the club, we are in trouble.
ergo president needs to step down as does the board who appointed her.
We need new list managers and a new coach and a new direction or else it is GAME OVER
-
the biggest thing wrong with this club aside from hiring a woman to preside over our club, is they look at the past before moving to the future.
I have no doubt dimwit would have been sacked at any other club, but for some stupid reason they look at geelong saving bombers career as the catalyst for the contract extension.
to save face in the public domain they now give coaches more years than they should or deserve to get.
I wish we get pumped by 10 goals plus for the next 5 games and no one turns up. Only then will this dud get the shown the door.
Mate, there is no need for this misogynistic bs. There are some fantastic women leading major organisations successfully as there are men. There are some poor ones too. Many presidents have never played footy so it's not a requirement in the job description.
Just stop this ridiculous shyte before you embarrass yourself further. Being a good or bad president has got nothing to do with gender. I am a bloke too. Get yourself out of the 1900's and into the 21st century. Whether Peggy is a good or bad president is one thing. Blaming her performance on her gender is just embarrassing for posters to read. You're better than that. It's just not acceptable.
-
She will be gone at years end
😉
-
Put your house on it, Jak
-
Put your house on it, Jak
You have heard what I have just heard no doubt 😉
-
And I have heard that before :snidegrin
-
And I have heard that before :snidegrin
Ah no
Was only informed tonight 😉
-
Why wasn't OER included?
Why weren't we asked to join in on the conversation?
Are the members of these forums better supporters than us?
Do we even exist? What the hell is going on here!
The same reason RFC_Official doesn't post here. Surely you figured that out :shh
Please enlighten me if you can.
Did we ever get a reason? I don't remember reading the reason why they abandoned us but not the others.
Does anyone know?
-
And I have heard that before :snidegrin
Ah no
Was only informed tonight 😉
Led by a very wealthy benefactor.... :shh
-
And I have heard that before :snidegrin
Ah no
Was only informed tonight 😉
Led by a very wealthy benefactor.... :shh
You are on the money 👍
His son actually 😉
-
And I have heard that before :snidegrin
Ah no
Was only informed tonight 😉
Led by a very wealthy benefactor.... :shh
You are on the money 👍
His son actually 😉
So the more things change at the RFC the more the remain the same then???
-
Why wasn't OER included?
Why weren't we asked to join in on the conversation?
Are the members of these forums better supporters than us?
Do we even exist? What the hell is going on here!
The same reason RFC_Official doesn't post here. Surely you figured that out :shh
Please enlighten me if you can.
Did we ever get a reason? I don't remember reading the reason why they abandoned us but not the others.
Does anyone know?
Oh there was a reason but it was just never posted on here
-
Why wasn't OER included?
Why weren't we asked to join in on the conversation?
Are the members of these forums better supporters than us?
Do we even exist? What the hell is going on here!
The same reason RFC_Official doesn't post here. Surely you figured that out :shh
Please enlighten me if you can.
Did we ever get a reason? I don't remember reading the reason why they abandoned us but not the others.
Does anyone know?
Oh there was a reason but it was just never posted on here
So please tell us the reason
-
Why wasn't OER included?
Why weren't we asked to join in on the conversation?
Are the members of these forums better supporters than us?
Do we even exist? What the hell is going on here!
The same reason RFC_Official doesn't post here. Surely you figured that out :shh
Please enlighten me if you can.
Did we ever get a reason? I don't remember reading the reason why they abandoned us but not the others.
Does anyone know?
Oh there was a reason but it was just never posted on here
So please tell us the reason
I was under the impression you received the same info I did?
-
I was under the impression you received the same info I did?
I have no idea if or what info you received
-
Thre's irony in kismet.
The tosspot bailed on OER because of the direct manner in which posters imposed their truthful opinions. ...and without answering....it disappeared....down the same hole as the club.
Oh well.