I'm not blaming the umps for the loss as we cost ourselves what should have been a win thanks to poor workrate from our forwards to hold the ball inside 50 and a poor defensive effort from our midfielders.
However I just watched Geischen's 'What's your Decision?' video clip on the AFL site and not one umpiring decision was mentioned from our game. Now given the AFL media blokes asked fans every Monday on twitter to suggest umpiring decisions for Geisch to explain and there were stacks of replies from Tiger supporters all asking about the holding the ball non-decisions, then either the AFL or Geisch has just snubbed all the Tiger supporters which is pretty gutless.
In any case the only thing I took out of the video clip [Rodan incident] is that Geisch and the AFL have now totally flipped 180 degrees the interpretation of 'prior opportunity'. Now you are allowed to run and bounce the ball as far and as long as you like, breaks tackles, and even after that if you are run down and tackled it'll still be called 'play on' if you can dispose of the ball legally in the tackle. Geisch said we want to "protect the ball player". Ah Geisch whatever happened to rewarding the tackler as we've done for 100+ years in the game
. Sorry but Rodan avoiding two tacklers and then getting tackled to the ground by the third one should be automatically holding the ball.
Who was number 23 for the umps?
Umpire No.23 was Robert Findlay.