If you dont get it Ill fill you in.
Ask the club and the swans what value they put on conca.
For the Nankervis trade we offered Conca and they rejected it. We then offered pick 47 and the trade was done.
Thanks for that.
An interesting analogy, but I don't think I'd bother asking either the club or the Swans what Conca was worth. Given that they agreed that Nankervis was only worth pick 47 you'd have to question the ability of either club to rate talent on this example.
I'll reiterate my point on Conca. I think he has the ability to be a handy player. Injuries have prevented him showing us what he can do, certainly in recent years. He has certainly had less chance to show us what he could do at AFL level than some of the other players on our list who have been given lots of games over a number of seasons and been found wanting at this level.
So while I get the idea that we would let Conca go if we feel he is injury prone, or if other players have gone past him, I am not sure why people are negative toward him. Richmond made him a pick 6, he didn't.