just curious about you decide it is the vast majority?
Just answered that question to WP.
You put 60,000 members in a room and the vast majority will say Hardwick needs to go as he is taking us backwards in the past couple of years.
that doesn't answer how you came to the conclusion. it is merely another assumption similar to the first.
So how do you draw this conclusion?
So I take it you are assuming the exact opposite of what I am proposing? That most Richmond supporters think we will win a premiership with Damian Hardwick? Common say it.
How do you come to that half wit conclusion?
Oh I see you have assumed that I make assumptions like yourself, and that there is only two possibilities at that.
You have just dragged yourself into George Bush type stupidity
Seems as you find it easier to come up with simpleton conclusions rather than answer a simple question, here's something to ponder...
what do you call it when one person bags someone else for making an unsupported assumption, then makes the exact opposite unsupported assumption themselves to say the first person was wrong?
I call it debating on a football forum.
So do you or do you not support that we will win a premiership with Damian Hardiwck? In this context, no other possibilities are being debated. Just the issue of whether supporters want him replaced or whether its just a noisy minority causing trouble for what our presidesent considers to be the vast majority of sensible supporters.
If you want your name calling to have any impact, back it up with an opinion on the subject.
LMAO,
In what alternate reality is bagging someone's assumption as being uniformed, then using your own uninformed assumption as proof they are wrong regarded as debating?
name calling? lmao
My opinion is 1 person just as yours is, and i am not presumptuous enough to think that everyone else thinks the same. so it is irrelevant.
The question at hand is what everyone else thinks, which you think you know, but you cant tell us how you know.
Nothing more, nothing less.
