« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down

Author Topic: Derickx, McGuane, Post and White???  (Read 3541 times)

Dubstep Dookie

  • Guest
Re: Derickx, McGuane, Post and White???
« Reply #30 on: October 21, 2012, 08:14:40 PM »
Quote from: smokey_58au on October 21, 2012, 06:58:15 PM
Quote from: MADTIGER2010 on October 21, 2012, 04:30:34 PM

We should keep all 4.
Post-should be given 1 year minimum. Reckon he can be one of our best key talls
Derrickx-worth another season. Has only played 2 games remember. At 202cm, he could be handy in the ruck
White-worth another season. Can be pretty good sometimes an messy other times. Needs to become consistent
Mcguane-should be given 1 year minimum. Experience is needed while our young talls develop.

All this coming from a poster who says he wants to make finals next year!   :o

Exactly  :facepalm
Logged

Offline MADTIGER2010

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1335
Re: Derickx, McGuane, Post and White???
« Reply #31 on: October 21, 2012, 08:22:34 PM »
Quote from: smokey_58au on October 21, 2012, 06:58:15 PM
Quote from: MADTIGER2010 on October 21, 2012, 04:30:34 PM

We should keep all 4.
Post-should be given 1 year minimum. Reckon he can be one of our best key talls
Derrickx-worth another season. Has only played 2 games remember. At 202cm, he could be handy in the ruck
White-worth another season. Can be pretty good sometimes an messy other times. Needs to become consistent
Mcguane-should be given 1 year minimum. Experience is needed while our young talls develop.

All this coming from a poster who says he wants to make finals next year!   :o

You saying we won't because I think we should keep those players?
Logged

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: Derickx, McGuane, Post and White???
« Reply #32 on: October 21, 2012, 09:20:30 PM »
Quote from: MADTIGER2010 on October 21, 2012, 08:22:34 PM
Quote from: smokey_58au on October 21, 2012, 06:58:15 PM
Quote from: MADTIGER2010 on October 21, 2012, 04:30:34 PM

We should keep all 4.
Post-should be given 1 year minimum. Reckon he can be one of our best key talls
Derrickx-worth another season. Has only played 2 games remember. At 202cm, he could be handy in the ruck
White-worth another season. Can be pretty good sometimes an messy other times. Needs to become consistent
Mcguane-should be given 1 year minimum. Experience is needed while our young talls develop.

All this coming from a poster who says he wants to make finals next year!   :o

You saying we won't because I think we should keep those players?

It sure won't help.
Logged

Offline Crumden

  • Future Richmond star
  • **
  • Posts: 48
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Derickx, McGuane, Post and White???
« Reply #33 on: October 21, 2012, 09:40:32 PM »
Don't think any of those 4 will have any bearing on whether we play finals. I'd expect them to be bit parts at best.
Logged

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: Derickx, McGuane, Post and White???
« Reply #34 on: October 22, 2012, 01:23:56 AM »
Quote from: smokey_58au on October 21, 2012, 09:20:30 PM
Quote from: MADTIGER2010 on October 21, 2012, 08:22:34 PM
Quote from: smokey_58au on October 21, 2012, 06:58:15 PM
Quote from: MADTIGER2010 on October 21, 2012, 04:30:34 PM

We should keep all 4.
Post-should be given 1 year minimum. Reckon he can be one of our best key talls
Derrickx-worth another season. Has only played 2 games remember. At 202cm, he could be handy in the ruck
White-worth another season. Can be pretty good sometimes an messy other times. Needs to become consistent
Mcguane-should be given 1 year minimum. Experience is needed while our young talls develop.

All this coming from a poster who says he wants to make finals next year!   :o

You saying we won't because I think we should keep those players?

It sure won't help.

 :lol
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
« previous next »