I'm not convinced Buckley is the best candidate for the job. He is the most high profile applicant but this is more to do with his over rated playing capabilities at the most over exposed media friendly club in this city. Buckley may turn out to be a great coach but surely people such as Hardwick and Hinkley, who both have had very positive impacts on their clubs as assistant coaches already, should be considered first.
Often we gets fooled into believing the capabilities of someone as the opinions of a few become blow into the reality of many. The media have all convinced themselves who is the best coach in waiting but what are they using as evidence???
Forget the illusion, we need evidence and proof before we make our choice
Stripes
Evidence and proof?.... Are they not the same thing?.... Anyway
What sort of evidence and proof do we need Stripes?
Maybe we wait until he has coach a couple of premierships first then just ask him to come to Richmond. If you don't think he would be a good coach then i have overated your opinion on this forum.
As for what the media thinks, who cares! Although some have a pretty good understanding of the game of AFL.
As for Hardwick and Hinkley, both have been over looked in the past for senior coaching jobs so they might not be as good as some may think!
This club needs a
TRUE leader and Nathan Buckley is that!