Author Topic: The men clubs would love to have back - Jay Schulz (I.F.)  (Read 5810 times)

Offline Tigeritis™©®

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9380
  • Richmond, Premiers 2017.2019
Re: The men clubs would love to have back - Jay Schulz (I.F.)
« Reply #15 on: April 18, 2012, 09:29:38 PM »
The article is about Shultz....

Second rate player in a second rate team IMO.

Wallace is full of it IMO. Second rate coach also.. He wasn't as good as he thought he was.
The club that keeps giving.

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: The men clubs would love to have back - Jay Schulz (I.F.)
« Reply #16 on: April 18, 2012, 09:37:40 PM »
Schulz had talent but was no doubt poorly developed at our joke of a club during the period he was there and Wallace has to wear a lot of the blame for that. However as usual he just passes the buck.

Offline Willy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5005
  • All up inside ya.
Re: The men clubs would love to have back - Jay Schulz (I.F.)
« Reply #17 on: April 18, 2012, 09:58:11 PM »
I think his workrate has improved since moving to Port as well.

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: The men clubs would love to have back - Jay Schulz (I.F.)
« Reply #18 on: April 18, 2012, 10:03:51 PM »
I think his workrate has improved since moving to Port as well.

Had a massive pre-season when he got over there. Improved his skin folds from 55 to 45 which is interesting for a then 24 year old. Like Wallet said, matured a lot and obviously he's a popular bloke if he's in their leadership group.

Can't believe we had him running around in the VFL if we were planning on trading him.

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: The men clubs would love to have back - Jay Schulz (I.F.)
« Reply #19 on: April 18, 2012, 10:39:52 PM »
He'd be playing the role Miller is now playing.

Craig Cameron is a huffer.

Having kicked 70.26 at an accuracy rate of 72 per cent since joining the Power

Love the Sarge but that's about what JR kicks in 1 year with a stupid haircut. Just sayin.

« Last Edit: April 19, 2012, 03:40:12 AM by one-eyed »

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: The men clubs would love to have back - Jay Schulz (I.F.)
« Reply #20 on: April 18, 2012, 11:17:39 PM »
72 in 35 games, gg.  :thumbsup Thank Geez he came good

The article is about Shultz....

Second rate player in a second rate team IMO.

Wallace is full of it IMO. Second rate coach also.. He wasn't as good as he thought he was.

I find it funny that you can't spell the dudes name right even when his name is in the title. You're such a slapper :clapping
« Last Edit: April 19, 2012, 01:24:38 AM by Coach Davey »

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: The men clubs would love to have back - Jay Schulz (I.F.)
« Reply #21 on: April 18, 2012, 11:20:41 PM »
Wallet shut up.

Schulz a dud player in a dud team.

Him and Richo did not work.

Butcher and Schulz will not work.

Butcher will develop nicely Schulz just takes up space.

Not losing sleep.

Most upset that Maxfield and Ottens left at the time.

Offline Tigeritis™©®

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9380
  • Richmond, Premiers 2017.2019
Re: The men clubs would love to have back - Jay Schulz (I.F.)
« Reply #22 on: April 19, 2012, 11:45:24 AM »
72 in 35 games, gg.  :thumbsup Thank Geez he came good

The article is about Shultz....

Second rate player in a second rate team IMO.

Wallace is full of it IMO. Second rate coach also.. He wasn't as good as he thought he was.

I find it funny that you can't spell the dudes name right even when his name is in the title. You're such a slapper :clapping
are you for real???
The club that keeps giving.

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: The men clubs would love to have back - Jay Schulz (I.F.)
« Reply #23 on: April 19, 2012, 02:25:25 PM »
i wonder how many time wallace actaully sat down and talked to Jay about what he needed to do to improve is game?
Every FU is always someone elses fault with this ahrse clown

i wish he would just STFU so we can forget his 5 disastrous years at the club and move on.

Wallace only talked to the young blokes once every couple months.

The supercoach was busy with tanning trading draft picks and other metrosexual acts

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: The men clubs would love to have back - Jay Schulz (I.F.)
« Reply #24 on: April 19, 2012, 05:16:41 PM »
72 in 35 games, gg.  :thumbsup Thank Geez he came good

The article is about Shultz....

Second rate player in a second rate team IMO.

Wallace is full of it IMO. Second rate coach also.. He wasn't as good as he thought he was.

I find it funny that you can't spell the dudes name right even when his name is in the title. You're such a slapper :clapping
are you for real???

Whoa, don't get mad at me. I'm just telling you what the bible says

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13171
Re: The men clubs would love to have back - Jay Schulz (I.F.)
« Reply #25 on: April 19, 2012, 08:15:49 PM »
I would rather damir Cloke back before lazy jay

Offline Tigeritis™©®

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9380
  • Richmond, Premiers 2017.2019
Re: The men clubs would love to have back - Jay Schulz (I.F.)
« Reply #26 on: April 19, 2012, 08:29:14 PM »
72 in 35 games, gg.  :thumbsup Thank Geez he came good

The article is about Shultz....

Second rate player in a second rate team IMO.

Wallace is full of it IMO. Second rate coach also.. He wasn't as good as he thought he was.

I find it funny that you can't spell the dudes name right even when his name is in the title. You're such a slapper :clapping
are you for real???

Whoa, don't get mad at me. I'm just telling you what the bible says
i'm not mad coach. I just don't have a clue what your talking about. 
The club that keeps giving.

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 57995
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: The men clubs would love to have back - Jay Schulz (I.F.)
« Reply #27 on: April 20, 2012, 01:46:47 AM »
We won by 10 goals so when a footy journo can't bag the present Tigers then go and bring up something irrelevant from the past to bag us  :sleep.

Schulz last year was Port's second highest goalkicker with 31 goals and their best key forward. Gray who is a midsized forward kicked one more (32) and Westhoff kicked 23. No other Port play kicked more than 20 goals. Compare that to our best key forward Riewoldt kicking 62 goals last year, our second highest was Vickery on 39 and three others kicked more than 20 goals - Dusty (33), Nahas (29), King (25). Miller was 7th highest (17) behind Cotch (18 ). So the article is comparing Port's second highest goalkicker last year with Richmond's 7th highest ::) :stupid.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: The men clubs would love to have back - Jay Schulz (I.F.)
« Reply #28 on: April 20, 2012, 03:20:38 AM »
We won by 10 goals so when a footy journo can't bag the present Tigers then go and bring up something irrelevant from the past to bag us  :sleep.

Schulz last year was Port's second highest goalkicker with 31 goals and their best key forward. Gray who is a midsized forward kicked one more (32) and Westhoff kicked 23. No other Port play kicked more than 20 goals. Compare that to our best key forward Riewoldt kicking 62 goals last year, our second highest was Vickery on 39 and three others kicked more than 20 goals - Dusty (33), Nahas (29), King (25). Miller was 7th highest (17) behind Cotch (18 ). So the article is comparing Port's second highest goalkicker last year with Richmond's 7th highest ::) :stupid.

They had injury troubles. Seem to be on the right track at the moment. Look at our second highest goal kicker from 2010....Ben Nason. Port will be right. and I thought Vickery kicked 35, not 40. Schulz has only played 35 games for them and has 70+ goals. You're a moron if you think that's not a damn sight better than what any forward (apart from Jack) we have has produced.

The article wasn't comparing Schulz to anyone. It's about players clubs would like to have back. and if we had a choice then I reckon we'd take Schulz back in a heartbeat. The lad can play. If he had an AFL standard midfield delivering it to him...:outtahere
« Last Edit: April 20, 2012, 04:06:41 AM by one-eyed »

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13171
Re: The men clubs would love to have back - Jay Schulz (I.F.)
« Reply #29 on: April 20, 2012, 07:42:42 AM »
Hes a hack