Author Topic: Toothless Tigers (Age)  (Read 1485 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95570
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Toothless Tigers (Age)
« on: April 27, 2012, 03:44:11 AM »
Toothless Tigers
Michael Gleeson and Matt Murnane
The Age
April 27, 2012


THEY have one of the most exciting full-forwards in the AFL and one of the most promising centre half-forwards. They should be among the most potent forward lines, but this year the Tigers have been toothless.

The problem is Jack Riewoldt has been missing in action, Tyrone Vickery has been desperately out of form, and back-up forward Brad Miller has offered little, which has created a self-perpetuating cycle for Richmond where the poor form of one exacerbates the problems of the other.

Richmond coach Damien Hardwick yesterday admitted he was troubled by his out-of-form forwards, but also pointed out it had not been a season for any tall forward yet.

''They're not playing to their potential,'' Hardwick said of Riewoldt, Vickery and Miller, admitting he had considered dropping one of the trio already this year. ''The funny thing about it is that the key forwards in general [have been down]. I think the leading goalkicker is on 13 goals this year, which is just over three goals a game.

''So overall there hasn't been a great deal of goals kicked by the key forwards. I think [Josh] Kennedy kicked a bag of seven, but he's on 11 for the year. So I think it's club-wide where key forwards aren't firing. We've got no doubt our guys will come through it, [and] hopefully deliver a blow this week, which would be nice.''

Riewoldt has kicked just six goals in four games after booting 78 and 62 goals in the past two seasons. His scoring accuracy of 40 per cent is the worst of the top 50 goalkickers. He booted 4.3 in the first-round loss to Carlton, but most of his goals came late in the match once the result was known. He took six marks against Melbourne in round three, but just two or three in the other matches.

Riewoldt remains the primary target for Richmond's midfield going inside 50, but his scoreboard output (not just his own scores but his score assists) is down from an average of 24 points a game last year to 18.8 points a game. He is taking fewer marks but has won 16 ground balls inside 50 this season, which is the most of any player, and he ranks sixth for disposals inside 50.

The result of this misfiring forward line has been that last year Richmond ranked third for scores from forward-50 entries; this year it is 14th.

Hardwick remains troubled by the defensive work Riewoldt is doing or, rather, not doing. ''His defensive area of his game is [what] we're probably a little bit concerned about,'' he said.

''The goals will come. I think he kicked … two out on the full. But if he keeps working on the defensive aspects and the intensity of his work-rate, that's where he'll get the results on the scoreboard.

''He can play better. There's no doubt about that.''

In part, Riewoldt's form line is a product of the quality of some of the opponents he has confronted. Ben Reid (Collingwood), James Frawley (Melbourne) and Tom Lonergan (Geelong) are all tailor-made to play against Riewoldt, each of them being taller, quicker and stronger.

He has also been hurt by Vickery's poor form as sides have been able to sag off Vickery in the belief he won't hurt them and concentrate on Riewoldt.

Riewoldt and Vickery both had extensive surgery in the off-season: Riewoldt had five operations but was back in full training by Christmas, while Vickery had shoulder surgery. Some at the club believe Vickery has yet to recover the confidence in his body since the surgery when flying for marks.

Riewoldt has normally played from behind a lot due to the fact he reads the ball better than most defenders and either runs at the pack to mark or he folds back towards goal and catches the defender out.

This year, though, he has been playing from behind more often, yet not been able to exploit his advantage.

Despite his lack of speed, he has a good leap and good hands and so marks over the back of packs rather than body-on-body with an opponent. His opponents have taken to playing him closer and keeping body contact.

Riewoldt has been criticised for poor body language, but that appears a relic of petulance in more recent years which has now made him an easy target for this criticism when his form is down.

''It's pretty hard to dull Jack's confidence on the field. He's fine,'' Hardwick said. ''He knows his form will turn around.''

Hardwick said he contemplated changing the mix in the forward line by dropping one of the tall forwards but had so far resisted the temptation.

''It's something that has come up,'' he said. ''Certain sides are playing three key forwards, some are playing two.

''But the hard thing about us this week is that with the Cox-Naitanui double, it's very hard to play with a smaller forward line when they've got four talls at the other end. So it's probably something that we haven't spoken about this week.''

Richmond has only won one game this year after a taxing early season draw which Hardwick admitted had him ''screaming throughout the night, for the first three nights'', when the AFL released the draw late last year.

''We've just got to make sure we try to get over the top of one of these sides and hopefully this is the week versus West Coast,'' he said.

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/toothless-tigers-20120426-1xo11.html#ixzz1tAZaROzd

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Toothless Tigers (Age)
« Reply #1 on: April 27, 2012, 04:44:07 AM »
FFS wake me up when groundhog day is over ........ :whistle
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline eliminator

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3705
Re: Toothless Tigers (Age)
« Reply #2 on: April 27, 2012, 06:54:43 AM »
Groundhog day was made for richmond supporters. Miller is a stop gap measure. He was only recruited to help out the development of younger players. On a good day he provides structure and can take a contested grab. However his kicking really lets him down. Miller needs to push up the ground, draw opponents and create space for Ty and Jack. Jack and Ty are good on a lead. Jack needs to play himself into form by leading more. I don't care what this article says Jack is good on a lead.

Online Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7591
Re: Toothless Tigers (Age)
« Reply #3 on: April 27, 2012, 07:19:38 AM »
At least its an original headline  ;D
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Toothless Tigers (Age)
« Reply #4 on: April 27, 2012, 07:56:49 AM »
I hope than when hardwick makes decions about whether or not to drop players he is not worrying about what other similar players in the league are doing.

I'm also not sure how the structure of our opponents forward line would affect the structure of our own forward line :huh
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Toothless Tigers (Age)
« Reply #5 on: April 27, 2012, 08:07:23 AM »
I hope than when hardwick makes decions about whether or not to drop players he is not worrying about what other similar players in the league are doing.

I'm also not sure how the structure of our opponents forward line would affect the structure of our own forward line :huh

The last statement is really odd.
We should do what works best for us

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Toothless Tigers (Age)
« Reply #6 on: April 27, 2012, 08:11:08 AM »
I hope than when hardwick makes decions about whether or not to drop players he is not worrying about what other similar players in the league are doing.

I'm also not sure how the structure of our opponents forward line would affect the structure of our own forward line :huh

True.  The only thing I can think of is that if our tall forwards start taking some grabs, they may have to move one of their talks down back thus disrupting their own structures.
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline Darth Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1124
  • Dimmasty RFC!
Re: Toothless Tigers (Age)
« Reply #7 on: April 27, 2012, 11:38:31 AM »
Where is the analysis of the alternatives ?  Griffiths, Post, Elton etc.

Half pregnant article.

Ox

  • Guest
Re: Toothless Tigers (Age)
« Reply #8 on: April 27, 2012, 03:11:33 PM »
It's the truth.

RFC Is comical. Hardy stuffin hah @ the rabble known as the Tigers.

There's hop pint in waiting for the change- it aint coming.

The culture down there died many moons ago and that's it.

Move on. ;D




Offline Willy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5006
  • All up inside ya.
Re: Toothless Tigers (Age)
« Reply #9 on: April 28, 2012, 12:18:44 AM »
Ox, you really know how to make a gal feel wanted.