Author Topic: Essendon face AFL probe/Players found Guilty by CAS  (Read 555447 times)

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: Essendon face AFL probe
« Reply #375 on: April 26, 2013, 10:19:55 AM »
Pretty disappointed RFC weren't on the gear  :banghead
falling behind the comp again  :banghead :banghead
gale march and co need to go!

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: Essendon face AFL probe
« Reply #376 on: April 26, 2013, 10:23:02 AM »
what's the bet the six players they dump in it will be:

Henry Slattery (delisted)
Mark McVeigh (retired)
Angus Monfries (Port)
Sam Lonergan (RFC)
Kyle Riemers (delisted)
Brent Prismall (delisted)

everyone else was innocent gov  ::)

dwaino

  • Guest
Re: Essendon face AFL probe
« Reply #377 on: April 26, 2013, 11:02:42 AM »
 :lol

With Billy the boot studder the mastermind.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95574
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Essendon face AFL probe
« Reply #378 on: April 27, 2013, 04:21:41 AM »
Essendon Football Club has discovered in its records an invoice for the banned performance-enhancing supplement Hexarelin.

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/essendon-find-bill-for-banned-drug-20130426-2ikou.html#ixzz2Rawx85sA

Offline Eat_em_Alive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4858
Re: Essendon face AFL probe
« Reply #379 on: April 27, 2013, 12:57:10 PM »
Essendon Football Club has discovered in its records an invoice for the banned performance-enhancing supplement Hexarelin.

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/essendon-find-bill-for-banned-drug-20130426-2ikou.html#ixzz2Rawx85sA

 :lol bet they've known about it all along IMV
The anywhere, anytime Tigers.
E A T  E M  A L I V E  M O F O S

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Essendon face AFL probe
« Reply #380 on: April 27, 2013, 01:26:36 PM »
Seriously should already have a penalty against them

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 39044
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Essendon face AFL probe
« Reply #381 on: April 27, 2013, 08:26:51 PM »
Essendon Football Club has discovered in its records an invoice for the banned performance-enhancing supplement Hexarelin.

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/essendon-find-bill-for-banned-drug-20130426-2ikou.html#ixzz2Rawx85sA

Arghh the smoking gun  :bow
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: Essendon face AFL probe
« Reply #382 on: April 27, 2013, 08:28:07 PM »
But apparently no one used it  :lol

Offline yellowandback

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4025
Re: Essendon face AFL probe
« Reply #383 on: April 28, 2013, 08:17:07 PM »
But apparently no one used it  :lol

Stuck the needle in but didn't inject - apparently got Clintons lawyers in to advise them
It's that simple Spud
"I discussed (it) with my three daughters, my wife and my 82-year-old mum, because it has really affected me … If those comments … were made about one of my daughters, it would make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I would not have liked it at all.”

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: Essendon face AFL probe
« Reply #384 on: April 28, 2013, 11:59:27 PM »
But apparently no one used it  :lol

Stuck the needle in but didn't inject - apparently got Clintons lawyers in to advise them

They better hope Heppell burnt his dress

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: Essendon face AFL probe
« Reply #385 on: April 29, 2013, 02:46:40 PM »
But apparently no one used it  :lol

Stuck the needle in but didn't inject - apparently got Clintons lawyers in to advise them

They better hope Heppell burnt his dress
:lol :lol :lol :lol

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Essendon face AFL probe
« Reply #386 on: April 29, 2013, 11:57:08 PM »
 :bluesbros3. The use of AOD-9604, in accordance with the WADAcode, brings with it the standard two-year ban. Areading of the explanatory notes within the WADACode attached to rules 10.5.1 and 10.5.2 indicates thatplayers banned for administering AOD-9604 will havea very hard time getting their penalties overturned asthe notes specify the administration of a prohibitedsubstance by the athlete’s personal physician or trainerwithout disclosure to the athlete does not constitute anacceptable excuse to have a ban overturned

EMERGENCY OVERVIEW
Harmful if swallowed.
Potential Health Effects
The toxicological properties of this material have not been investigated. Use appropriate procedures to prevent opportunities
for direct contact with the skin or eyes and to prevent inhalation. Compound is Non-hazardous,Non-Toxic/Non-Flammable.

 :bluesbros

.

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Essendon face AFL probe
« Reply #387 on: April 30, 2013, 11:46:50 AM »
Apparently the Essendon internal review by Ziggy Switkowski is done and will be made public this week

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: Essendon face AFL probe
« Reply #388 on: April 30, 2013, 12:44:58 PM »
Internal review by a known Essendon sycophant in an attempt to add legitimacy to their pathetic excuse of poor governance as opposed to systematic doping

Good stuff Dons  :thumbsup

Offline wayne

  • Fame of Hall
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8415
  • In Absentia
Re: Essendon face AFL probe
« Reply #389 on: April 30, 2013, 02:37:56 PM »
TAB.com.au have suspended betting....  :shh
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do