Author Topic: Coughlan contracted for '08?  (Read 2157 times)

Online torch

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5292
  • 28YrM&8YrMRC 🏆🏆🏆 ‘17, ‘19-‘20; 2 x Attendee 🐯
Re: Coughlan contracted for '08?
« Reply #15 on: October 17, 2007, 10:06:48 PM »
so he should be contracted !!!

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: Coughlan contracted for '08?
« Reply #16 on: October 18, 2007, 01:11:55 PM »
author=Tigermonk link=topic=6091.msg77729#msg77729 date=1192499113]
what it means is that if a player is continuely hampered with injuries that the club should not renew his contract & trade him

Ok, so he’s of no value to us but he’s of value to another Club. :-\

And even though he's spent his career at this Club another club should reap the benefits when he fully recovers.  Which he will.

I take it that's what you mean.

David Rodan made the club look silly this year.  Nothing in comparison to what Cogs could do, given the chance.


[/quote]

yep for Richmond to go forward they need a list of fit & healthy players
not a list with 4 or 5 longterm injured players who hold the club back from progress

Offline tigersalive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2772
Re: Coughlan contracted for '08?
« Reply #17 on: October 18, 2007, 03:17:43 PM »
author=Tigermonk link=topic=6091.msg77729#msg77729 date=1192499113]
what it means is that if a player is continuely hampered with injuries that the club should not renew his contract & trade him

Ok, so he’s of no value to us but he’s of value to another Club. :-\

And even though he's spent his career at this Club another club should reap the benefits when he fully recovers.  Which he will.

I take it that's what you mean.

David Rodan made the club look silly this year.  Nothing in comparison to what Cogs could do, given the chance.



yep for Richmond to go forward they need a list of fit & healthy players
not a list with 4 or 5 longterm injured players who hold the club back from progress
[/quote]

But he isnt TM, he should be fit to go at Round 1.  :thumbsup
EAT EM ALIVE!

Offline Tiger Spirit

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1400
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Coughlan contracted for '08?
« Reply #18 on: October 23, 2007, 06:33:32 PM »
yep for Richmond to go forward they need a list of fit & healthy players
not a list with 4 or 5 longterm injured players who hold the club back from progress

Not sure who those 4 or 5 long term injured players on the list are.  But obviously that’s what has held the Club back till now.

In any case, I’d rather invest time and effort into Cogs and have him in my team any day; on one leg with one arm tied behind his back.  But maybe you’re right TM.  Fit and healthy players is what we need, because what could it say if we had players on our list who had to come back from adversity?

It might say that they have some ticker, resilience and the ability to persist.  Hardly the traits you’d want in a player really and it’s not like resilience and persistence have been associated with RFC teams in recent times, so why ruin the track record now and find out if those traits even exist in players?  Instead we’ll adopt your ‘use and abuse’ mentality.  Much more rewarding and more likely to help build a premiership team than resilience and persistence ever could.

Weren’t the signs from trade week scary enough, without trying to rid the Club of any inside players that may be left on the list, injured or otherwise?
Everything that is done in this world is done by hope.  --Martin Luther

The time you enjoy wasting isn’t wasted time.