Author Topic: Biggest sooky little babies?  (Read 197310 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95583
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1170 on: April 07, 2023, 12:48:03 AM »
Quote from: catscollector
2020 will forever be tainted.
Half the competition couldn't give a sh*t just like most other sporting codes around the world. And I'd say the same thing if Geelong pinched that flag.
17 week season, 16 minute quarters lol, no wonder it'll be the last time in decades your mob win anything.
Quote from: catscollector
Your last flag was won in a bubble. A time when the world couldn't really give a toss about sport. Most teams weren't trying. Games were delayed, shortened, and the finals began in round 19!
lol, that is right around the time when potential finalists are settling their best 22 for the month leading into finals.
2020*
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/geelong-v-richmond-go.1350913/

Offline MintOnLamb

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3470
  • You have to think anyway, so why not think big? DT
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1171 on: April 07, 2023, 06:29:26 AM »
IIRC, the mafia/media was saying at the time something along the lines..

“Whichever team wins the flag this year(2020) in such disruptive conditions it will be the greatest win since the competition started”

I may be wrong but is should have added. “…except Richmond”

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95583
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1172 on: April 13, 2023, 06:42:55 AM »
Quote from: christopher lee
Tom lynch not suspended isn't a shock the bloke is the most protected player in the league
Quote from: cuzzy
Tigers big VFL club of course they win absolutely no surprise
Quote from: Sharon H
Rubbing the Trent Cochin genie.
Quote from: Leigh Wintershoven
3 certainties in life: death, taxes, and Tom Lynch being cleared at the tribunal.
Quote from: daarrrroonnnn
The grubbiest grub to ever grub
Quote from: major tom
No one should be surprised with this decision it is lynch after all
Quote from: Harry
One of the worst, cowardly, snipers, we’ve seen in footy. Cheap shots, dog acts, and intent to hurt players in vulnerable situations.
Can play footy, no doubt. But Lynch is cowardly sniper of the worst kind.
Quote from: Ian HOLLAND
Of course he’s free to play l said he’s a Richmond player and a Victorian one of the protected. a player from any interstate team would have been rubbed out. Who cares if Alex got knocked out we are supposed to be protecting the players. I am so over the MRO, mob of crooks.
Quote from: Rational Carlton Fan
That’s it! I’m officially unfollowing the AFL now! This is beyond a farce. This thug should have been banished for 4+ weeks!! And he’s just gotten 0! The AFL need to have a hard long look at themselves and how they operate because they are losing loyal fans. Goodbye, AFL!
https://twitter.com/FOXFOOTY/status/1645745971744378882

Online Damo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3904
  • Member of famed “Gang Of Four”. Ground the airbus!
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1173 on: April 13, 2023, 11:19:19 AM »
Lmao
Rational Carlton Fan again

That idiot is the gift that keeps giving
He made a habit of popping up in this thread throwing his toys out the cot

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95583
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1174 on: April 14, 2023, 01:11:45 AM »
Quote from: nath :)
Every year it’s “should Richmond steal [insert star player from non vic club here]”. Can they develop their own talent for once? Most of their star players came from trades!
Quote from: Josh
Why don’t the tigers just take all of the Giants list why there’re at it
https://twitter.com/AFL/status/1646045926912589824

Online Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8945
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1175 on: April 14, 2023, 11:17:25 AM »
Better headline.

How about some other teams manage their lists better instead of offering stupid money on back-ended deals that are guaranteed to cause cap pressure and result in a fire sale?

Looking at you GWS, Pies etc

Offline wayne

  • Fame of Hall
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8415
  • In Absentia
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1176 on: April 17, 2023, 10:54:58 AM »
Quote from: nath :)
Every year it’s “should Richmond steal [insert star player from non vic club here]”. Can they develop their own talent for once? Most of their star players came from trades!


 :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95583
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1177 on: April 18, 2023, 10:10:33 PM »
Quote from: AFL
Anthony Caminiti has received a three-match ban for striking.
Quote from: Matt
Yep. Cotchin laid a similar hit in a prelim. Played the next week
Quote from: Sarah 🦢
What about Shai Bolton?! Nothing!
https://twitter.com/AFL/status/1648259278028021760


Pies supporter.
Quote from: Lachie 🇦🇺
Back to irrelevance for another 37 years
https://twitter.com/lachy_33/status/1647900304300740608

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95583
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1178 on: May 02, 2023, 03:34:15 PM »
Quote from: Gazza
Tassie Tigers send Richmond there, They have a Tassie tradition and they only get 25k to Melbourne games these days.
https://twitter.com/gazgeelong

Quote from: Andrew Wu
Winners of seven of the last 10 premierships. Equalisation at work. #AFLTigersSuns

Quote from: outbreezyWC
this stat is only true because the hawks and tigers were able to stockpile 6 flags due to fixturing/GF location advantages
https://twitter.com/wutube/status/1652582449669603330

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95583
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1179 on: May 05, 2023, 04:17:12 PM »
Dogs fan's slightly obsessed.

Quote from: Dylan Thomson
Lmao, watch pure footy. It backs up this. 7 years no hurt no damage, best. Enjoy, it’s OVER 😂 😂
Quote from: Dylan Thomson
Man. It’s over, apologies. Enjoy bottom 6 next 5 years, it’ll be f****** awesome to watch. LESGOOOO
Quote from: Dylan Thomson

https://twitter.com/dthomson42/status/1654326402446143489

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95583
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1180 on: May 13, 2023, 07:09:13 AM »
Quote from: Jhye Clark 13
Richmond are an average side. Auskick footy.

Full side we win by a lot.
Quote from: Finknottle
True, Richmond rely on snaps at goal, scrubbing the ball along the ground and punching it forward. It worked against us because our team balance was shot. Parfitt and Bews were terrible, but there were several not much better. The extra handball to a player under the pump happened with regularity. Sometimes it's better to just kick the ball forward. Two Geelong players competing against each other while one Richmond player waits for the ball to be fumbled out. 3 Geelong backs going for the mark against 1 Richmond forward. 5 Geelong players swarming in the honeypot while 3 Richmond players wait for it to be squeezed out. The video will make for interesting viewing during the week.
Quote from: caitsith01
I'm sick of getting outcoached by that idiot Hardwick. When every long kick goes to an unmarked Tiger then something is way, way off.

That reminded me of the 2020 GF and was most unpleasant.
Quote from: UnitedWarrior93
We won pretty much all the stats, despite playing poorly and kicking for goal poorly. 8 premiership players out, while Richmond played their best game of the year and kicking out of their ass at goal.

Let the media run win the tigers are back lol.
Quote from: cats_09
Being at the game it seemed that majority of the Richmond crowd must have come in after they opened the gates at 3/4 time

The crowd was silent when Richmond ran out at the start of the match, and even during the first half they made noise but nothing crazy

According the board, the attendance was a tad over 58k, and they seemed to finally find their voice in the last - but damn that's got to be disappointing for Richmond with that turnout

They want these Friday night matches and to be taken seriously as a "Big Club", but when you factor in the Geelong crew that would have turned up, less than half of Richmond's reported 100k+ members turned up for a home match at their home ground

One reason I love Geelong & our home games - our fans turn out to support our club, and there's barely a seat to be found regardless of our opponent & when where playing down at KP
Quote from: Jemaine
The crowd of 58k tonight was pathetic, there is no amount of tiger fan crying that should be able to stop them playing at KP next year.

When they do have a whinge, point to this game and ask where the other 50k members were.
Quote from: fpm84
It is an indictment on Richmond that we were alive so late and that their million dollar midfield got thumped in clearances by a VFL side. The Taranto and Hopper deals will haunt them for a long time.
Quote from: kickazz
Geez Richmond's game style means they give away more frees than they get, regularly.

Tonight it was 2:1 in their favour. Every dodgy one seemed to go their way apart from Jezza's dropped mark.

Think we were a bit unlucky there. Umps rarely matter as much as people think. I recon you get one game a year where you can feel a bit aggrieved, hopefully this was it.
Quote from: SleazySimon
Not allowed to touch dusty but hes allowed to push, got it
Quote from: Schmegg
Giving Richmond fans a bone in a year they won’t amount to much will ensure they will be posting rubbish at the pointy end about how they “beat Geelong at their best”.
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/argh-bugger-tigers-by-24.1356691/

Quote from: Jimmy 'Melb City 3-Peat' Fazz
Umpires seem to have forgotten we are in 2023 and not 2019 and that Richmond aren't a contender
Quote from: Jimmy Wheelbarrow
Just like the good old days. Umps cheating like crazy for the
Quote from: Tom McInnes

https://twitter.com/AFL/status/1656992264886063104

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95583
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1181 on: August 11, 2023, 12:19:17 PM »
Bitter Bomber fans  :wallywink.

Quote from: Tony Walton
While you're cleaning out your locker, ask Jobe to come in and collect his Charlie. It's not really yours.
Quote from: Nathan Storer
Should still be in jail for theft.
Quote from: tank for harley @averagedons
dog act winner 2012
Quote from: Ray
Great career Cotch , one of the best your a super star, but u didn't win 2012 brownlow

https://twitter.com/AFL/status/1689426185338695681
https://twitter.com/triplemfooty/status/1689577330195513346

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95583
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1182 on: November 15, 2023, 11:37:59 PM »
Quote from: "Tom Lhinton
Two years ago they were chasing sheep around on pre season camp.

Last year they were building sandcastles in Lorne.

This year they’re passing out in heat chambers.

Lol, the gift that keeps on giving the Tiges. 😂
Quote from: Mat
You know a team is desperate when they try this sort of poo
https://twitter.com/xandermcg9/status/1724705664709341397


Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95583
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1184 on: March 04, 2024, 10:41:13 PM »
Tim Gossage

Wooden spoon: Richmond

https://www.sen.com.au/news/2024/03/04/sens-experts-from-around-the-country-make-their-2024-afl-season-predictions/

Everyone at SEN tipped the Weagles for the spoon except Goosage.